0315010506 Chattooga River HUC 8 Watershed: Upper Coosa

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

0315010506 Chattooga River HUC 8 Watershed: Upper Coosa Georgia Ecological Services U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service 2/9/2021 HUC 10 Watershed Report HUC 10 Watershed: 0315010506 Chattooga River HUC 8 Watershed: Upper Coosa Counties: Chattooga, Floyd Major Waterbodies (in GA): Chattooga River, Raccoon Creek, Clarks Creek, Hinton Creek, Taliaferro Creek, Lake Tightsqueeze Federal Listed Species: (historic, known occurrence, or likely to occur in the watershed) E - Endangered, T - Threatened, C - Candidate, CCA - Candidate Conservation species, PE - Proposed Endangered, PT - Proposed Threatened, Pet - Petitioned, R - Rare, U - Uncommon, SC - Species of Concern. Upland Combshell (Epioblasma metastriata) US: E; GA: E Historical Occurrence; No surveys necessary, presumed extirpated from Georgia. Southern Acornshell (Epioblasma othcaloogensis) US: E; GA: E Historical Occurrence; No surveys necessary, presumed extirpated from Georgia. Southern Combshell (Epioblasma penita) US: E; GA: E Historical Occurrence; No surveys necessary, presumed extirpated from Georgia. Finelined Pocketbook (Hamiota altilis) US: T; GA: T Historical Occurrence; Survey period: year round, when water temperatures are above 10° C and excluding when stage is increasing or above normal. Alabama Moccasinshell (Medionidus acutissimus) US: T; GA: T Historical Occurrence; Survey period: year round, when water temperatures are above 10° C and excluding when stage is increasing or above normal. Coosa Moccasinshell (Medionidus parvulus) US: E; GA: E Historical Occurrence; Survey period: year round, when water temperatures are above 10° C and excluding when stage is increasing or above normal. Southern Pigtoe (Pleurobema georgianum) US: E; GA: E Historical Occurrence; Survey period: year round, when water temperatures are above 10° C and excluding when stage is increasing or above normal. Updated: 2/9/2021 0315010506 Chattooga River 1 Georgia Ecological Services U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service 2/9/2021 HUC 10 Watershed Report Gray Bat (Myotis grisescens) US: E; GA: E HUC 10 Watershed: Occurrence; Survey period: 15 May - 15 Aug. Northern Long-eared Bat (Myotis septentrionalis) US: T; GA: T Occurrence; habitat model; Survey period: 15 May - 15 Aug. Indiana Bat (Myotis sodalis) US: E; GA: E Potential Range (habitat model); Survey period: 15 May - 15 Aug. Monkeyface Orchid (Platanthera integrilabia) US: T; GA: T Potential Range (county); Survey period: flowering 15 Jul - 31 Aug. Kral's Water-Plantain (Sagittaria secundifolia) US: T; GA: T Potential Range (county); Survey period: 1 May - 30 Sep. Large-flowered Skullcap (Scutellaria montana) US: T; GA: T Occurrence; Survey period: mid May - early Jun. Use of a nearby reference site to more accurately determine local flowering period is recommended. Federal Candidate, Candidate Conservation, or Petitioned Species: (likely or known to occur in the watershed) Cave or close proximity to a cave (Caves) Named cave; At least one cave or an area with 0.25 mi of a cave occurs in this watershed. Coosa Creekshell (Villosa umbrans) US: Pet Occurrence; Survey period: year round, when water temperatures are above 10° C and excluding when stage is increasing or above normal. Green Salamander (Aneides aeneus) US: Pet; GA: R Occurrence; Survey period: 1 Apr - 30 Jun, 01 Oct - 30 Nov. Cherokee Clubtail (Gomphus consanguis) US: Pet; GA: T Occurrence; Survey period: 1 -30 Jun Georgia Aster (Symphyotrichum georgianum) US: CCA; GA: T Occurrence; Survey period: flowering early Sep - early Nov. Use of a nearby reference site to more accurately determine local flowering period is recommended. State Listed or Other At-risk Species: (likely or known to occur in the watershed) Chattooga River Crayfish (Cambarus scotti) GA: T Occurrence; Please consult with GDNR for survey efforts. Updated: 2/9/2021 0315010506 Chattooga River 2 Georgia Ecological Services U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service 2/9/2021 HUC 10 Watershed Report Coldwater Darter (Etheostoma ditrema) GA: E HUC 10 Watershed: Occurrence; Please consult with GDNR for survey efforts. Lined Chub (Hybopsis lineapunctata) GA: R Historical Occurrence; Please consult with GDNR for survey efforts. Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) GA: T Occurrence; Survey period: year-round. Northern Map Turtle (Graptemys geographica) GA: R Occurrence; Please consult with GDNR for survey efforts. Pink Ladyslipper (Cypripedium acaule) GA: U Occurrence; Please consult with GDNR for survey efforts. Cumberland Rose Gentian (Sabatia capitata) GA: R Occurrence; Please consult with GDNR for survey efforts. Royal Catchfly (Silene regia) GA: E Occurrence; Please consult with GDNR for survey efforts. Any of the above species may occur in suitable habitat in this HUC 10 watershed. Survey dates are provided for reference only. Please coordinate with your lead federal agency, Georgia Department of Natural Resources, or USFWS to determine if surveys will help assess project impacts to species of concern. Watershed Specific Concerns: There are federally listed aquatic/wetland and terrestrial species that occur or could occur in this watershed. If the project contains suitable habitat for listed species, please contact your lead federal agency to determine the appropriate next step for those species to inform their NEPA and ESA decisions. Coordination with Georgia Department of Natural Resources may also be helpful in those decisions. Bats/Caves: Please determine if your project will impact caves or cave-like habitats. Microclimates in cave or cave-like habitats can be impacted when drilling or other activities impact karst areas. Please coordinate with our office if your project will impact these habitats or is within 0.5 of these habitats. A 4(d) rule exempts take of Northern Long-eared Bats from the Endangered Species Act's prohibitions, except in areas surrounding known winter hibernacula or summer maternity roosts. Clearing of hardwood trees identified as potential habitat during the winter or when young bats are able to fly (August 1 through May 14) may reduce the risk of take for a project proponent. Our records indicate that there are named caves or areas in the immediate vicinity of a cave in this watershed. These caves could represent maternity habitat for Gray Bats and hibernacula for Gray and Northern Long-eared Bats. Freshwater Aquatics: Please use guidance found in the Riparian Buffer, Streambank, and Stream Channel Protection and Water Quality Protection sections below for projects that may impact populations of this species. Please coordinate any avoidance and minimization efforts for the federally listed species with our office. Bald Eagle: Bald Eagles and their nests are protected from take, including disturbance, under the federal Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. For information about Bald and Golden Eagles see the Service's regional web page: https://www.fws. Updated: 2/9/2021 0315010506 Chattooga River 3 Georgia Ecological Services U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service 2/9/2021 HUC 10 Watershed Report HUCgov/southeast/our-services/permits/eagles/ 10 Watershed: Georgia Rockcress: Georgia Rockcress occurs in shallow soils of rocky slopes/bluffs and river banks, over limestone or granite. This species is identifiable when fruiting, from May to early July. Monkeyface Orchid: This orchid occurs in seeps, springheads, seepy streambanks, or other swampy habitats. Many of the orchid species are highly sought after for ornamental or gardening purposes. Protecting locations of populations of Monkeyface Orchid is important to the recovery of this species. Avoidance of ditching, draining, or filling can help protect the hydrology of orchid habitats. Kral's Water-Plantain: Kral's Water-Plantain occurs in streams with sandstone, rocky shoals, and boulders. This aquatic species is typically found in unpolluted streams with minimal sedimentation. Proper erosion and sedimentation controls should be used in any project in watersheds containing this species. If activities upstream of populations could release large amounts of sedimentation or fine materials into the waterway, methods should be used to protect the plants from burial or smothering. Large-flowered Skullcap: This watershed has known occurrences of Large-flowered Skullcap. This species occurs in hardwood or mix-hardwood forests with a relatively open understory. Any activities in the vicinity of skullcap populations should minimize disturbances that would promote invasive species. Georgia Aster: This watershed is within the range of candidate conservation species Georgia Aster. Georgia Aster can be found in open forests or forest edges and right-of-ways. Use of prescribed fire or mowing in winter or early spring to create or maintain sunny openings, avoiding the use of herbicides, and avoiding clear-cutting and soil disturbance can help protect areas where this species occurs. Trout Stream: This watershed contains streams designated as Primary or Secondary Trout Streams by the State of Georgia. These streams support native and introduced trout populations. Maintenance of cold water temperatures, preservation of vegetated stream buffers, and strict sediment and erosion control are critical for these streams. Priority Watershed: This watershed has been identified as a moderately significant high priority watershed for aquatic species. This indicates that the watershed contains important populations of high priority aquatic species or is an important watershed for aquatic organisms. For more information, please see the following fact sheet: https://www.fws.gov/athens/transportation/pdfs/SWAP_Priority_Watershed_fact_sheet_2017.pdf Species
Recommended publications
  • Environmental Report (ER) (TVA 2003) in Conjunction with Its Application for Renewal of the BFN Ols, As Provided for by the Following NRC Regulations
    Biological Assessment Browns Ferry Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal Review Limestone County, Alabama October 2004 Docket Numbers 50-259, 50-260, and 50-296 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Rockville, Maryland Biological Assessment of the Potential Effects on Endangered or Threatened Species from the Proposed License Renewal for the Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant 1.0 Introduction The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) licenses the operation of domestic nuclear power plants in accordance with the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and NRC implementing regulations. The Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) operates Browns Ferry Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1, 2, and 3 (BFN) pursuant to NRC operating license (OL) numbers DPR-33, DPR-52, DPR-68, which expire on December 20, 2013, June 28, 2014, and July 2, 2016, respectively. TVA has prepared an Environmental Report (ER) (TVA 2003) in conjunction with its application for renewal of the BFN OLs, as provided for by the following NRC regulations: C Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 54, “Requirements for Renewal of Operating Licenses for Nuclear Power Plants,” Section 54.23, Contents of application - environmental information (10 CFR 54.23). C Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 51, “Environmental Protection Regulations for Domestic Licensing and Related Regulatory Functions,” Section 51.53, Postconstruction environmental reports, Subsection 51.53(c), Operating license renewal stage (10 CFR 51.53(c)). The renewed OLs would allow up to 20 additional years of plant operation beyond the current licensed operating term. No major refurbishment or replacement of important systems, structures, or components are expected during the 20-year BFN license renewal term.
    [Show full text]
  • September 24, 2018
    September 24, 2018 Sent via Federal eRulemaking Portal to: http://www.regulations.gov Docket Nos. FWS-HQ-ES-2018-0006 FWS-HQ-ES-2018-0007 FWS-HQ-ES-2018-0009 Bridget Fahey Chief, Division of Conservation and Classification U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 5275 Leesburg Pike, MS: ES Falls Church, VA 22041-3808 [email protected] Craig Aubrey Chief, Division of Environmental Review Ecological Services Program U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 5275 Leesburg Pike, MS: ES Falls Church, VA 22041 [email protected] Samuel D. Rauch, III National Marine Fisheries Service Office of Protected Resources 1315 East-West Highway Silver Spring, MD 20910 [email protected] Re: Proposed Revisions of Endangered Species Act Regulations Dear Mr. Aubrey, Ms. Fahey, and Mr. Rauch: The Southern Environmental Law Center (“SELC”) submits the following comments in opposition to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s and National Marine Fisheries Service’s proposed revisions to the Endangered Species Act’s implementing regulations.1 We submit these comments on behalf of 57 organizations working to protect the natural resources of the 1 Revision of the Regulations for Prohibitions to Threatened Wildlife and Plants, 83 Fed. Reg. 35,174 (proposed July 25, 2018) (to be codified at 50 C.F.R. pt. 17); Revision of Regulations for Interagency Cooperation, 83 Fed. Reg. 35,178 (proposed July 25, 2018) (to be codified at 50 C.F.R. pt. 402); Revision of the Regulations for Listing Species and Designating Critical Habitat, 83 Fed. Reg. 35,193 (proposed July 25, 2018) (to be codified at 50 C.F.R.
    [Show full text]
  • Changes in the Freshwater Mussel Assemblage in the East Fork Tombigbee River, Mississippi: 1988–2011
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by The University of North Carolina at Greensboro CHANGES IN THE FRESHWATER MUSSEL ASSEMBLAGE IN THE EAST FORK TOMBIGBEE RIVER, MISSISSIPPI: 1988–2011 A Thesis by BYRON A. HAMSTEAD Submitted to the Graduate School at Appalachian State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE August 2013 Department of Biology CHANGES IN THE FRESHWATER MUSSEL ASSEMBLAGE IN THE EAST FORK TOMBIGBEE RIVER, MISSISSIPPI: 1988–2011 A Thesis by BYRON A. HAMSTEAD August 2013 APPROVED BY: Dr. Michael M. Gangloff Chairperson, Thesis Committee Dr. Robert P. Creed Member, Thesis Committee Dr. Mike D. Madritch Member, Thesis Committee Dr. Sue L. Edwards Chairperson, Department of Biology Edelma D. Huntley Dean, Cratis Williams Graduate School Copyright by Byron Hamstead 2013 All Rights Reserved Abstract CHANGES IN THE FRESHWATER MUSSEL ASSEMBLAGE IN THE EAST FORK TOMBIGBEE RIVER, MISSISSIPPI: 1988–2011 Byron Hamstead B.A., Appalachian State University M.A., Appalachian State University Chairperson: Michael Gangloff The Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway is among the largest and most expensive environmental engineering projects of the 20th century. The waterway accommodates barge navigation between the Tennessee River drainage and Mobile River Basin through a series of locks, dams, canals, and dredged and diverted streams. These alterations have destroyed much riverine habitat and fragmented remaining aquatic habitats resulting in isolated freshwater mussel populations in patches of streams like the East Fork Tombigbee River, where 42 species were historically known. The first post-waterway mussel surveys in 1987 and 1988 reported 31 taxa (including 2 federally-listed species).
    [Show full text]
  • Nitrogen Pollution Is Linked to US Listed Species Declines
    Overview Articles Nitrogen Pollution Is Linked to US Listed Species Declines DANIEL L. HERNÁNDEZ, DENA M. VALLANO, ERIKA S. ZAVALETA, ZDRAVKA TZANKOVA, JAE R. PASARI, STUART WEISS, PAUL C. SELMANTS, AND CORINNE MOROZUMI Downloaded from Nitrogen (N) pollution is increasingly recognized as a threat to biodiversity. However, our understanding of how N is affecting vulnerable species across taxa and broad spatial scales is limited. We surveyed approximately 1400 species in the continental United States listed as candidate, threatened, or endangered under the US Endangered Species Act (ESA) to assess the extent of recognized N-pollution effects on biodiversity in both terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. We found 78 federally listed species recognized as affected by N pollution. To illustrate the complexity of tracing N impacts on listed species, we describe an interdisciplinary case study that addressed the threat of N pollution to California Bay http://bioscience.oxfordjournals.org/ Area serpentine grasslands. We demonstrate that N pollution has affected threatened species via multiple pathways and argue that existing legal and policy regulations can be applied to address the biodiversity consequences of N pollution in conjunction with scientific evidence tracing N impact pathways. Keywords: biodiversity, endangered species, eutrophication, nitrogen deposition iodiversity loss is a major environmental challenge, 1979, and 1982; the CAA was passed in 1963, with subse- Bwith a growing number of recognized drivers that quent amendments passed
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 69, No. 55/Monday, March 22, 2004/Notices
    13326 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 55 / Monday, March 22, 2004 / Notices (Dermochelys coriacea) while (Percina aurolineata), Conasauga Anthony’s river snail (Athernia administrating the State stranding logperch (Percina jenkinsi), snail darter anthonyi) while conducting dredging program, conducting presence and (Percina tanasi), flatwoods salamander and presence or absence surveys. The absence studies, and managing the (Ambystoma cingulatum), fat threeridge proposed activities would occur in population. The proposed activities (Amblema neislerii), purple Jackson County, Alabama. would occur in the State of Alabama. bankclimber (Elliptoideus sloatianus), Dated: March 10, 2004. Injured or sick sea turtles would be upland combshell (Epioblasma Sam D. Hamilton, transported to facilities in Florida, metastriata), southern acornshell Mississippi, or Louisiana. (Epioblasma othcaloogensis), southern Regional Director. Applicant: Curtis S. Garriock, Pittsboro, combshell (Epioblasma penita), fine- [FR Doc. 04–6331 Filed 3–19–04; 8:45 am] North Carolina, TE083020–0. lined pocketbook (Lampsilis altilis), BILLING CODE 4310–55–P The applicant requests authorization Orange-nacre mucket (Lampsilis to take (capture and release) Saint perovalis), shinyrayed pocketbook Francis’ Satyr (Neonympha mitchellii (Lampsilis subangulata), Alabama DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR francisci) while conducting presence moccasinshell (Medionidus Fish and Wildlife Service and absence studies and population acutissimus), Coosa moccasinshell inventories. The activities would
    [Show full text]
  • Recovery Plan for Five Tombigbee River Mussels
    Recovery Plan for Five Tombigbee River Mussels Curtus’ Pearly Mussel (Pleurobema curtuni Marshall’s Pearly Mussel (Pleurobema niarshalli Judge Tait’s Mussel (Pleurobema taitianum Penitent Mussel (Epioblasma penita Stirrup Shell (Ouadrula stapes ) Five Tombigbee River Mussels Recovery Plan Prepared by James H. Stewart U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Jackson, Mississippi for Southeast Region U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Atlanta, Georgia Approved: Re~onalDirector,~U.S. Fish and ‘.L.i~dlife Service Date: November 14, 1989 Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions which are believed to be required to recover and/or protect the listed species. Plans are prepared by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, sometimes with the assistance of recovery teams, contractors, State agencies, and others. Objectives will only be attained and funds expended contingent upon appropriations, priorities, and other budgetary constraints. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views nor the official positions or approvals of any individuals or agencies, other than the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, involved in the plan formulation. They represent the official position of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service only after they have been signed by the Regional Director or Director as aDDroved. Approved recovery plans are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in species’ status, and the completion of recovery tasks. Literature citation should read as follows: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1989. Five Tombigbee River Mussels Recovery Plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Atlanta, Georgia. 18 pp. Additional copies may be purchased from: Fish and Wildlife Reference Service 5430 Grosvenor Lane, Suite 110 Bethesda, Maryland 20814 301/492-6403 or 1/800/582-3421 The fee for the plan varies depending on the number of pages of the plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Resource Inventory and Assessment Cahaba River National Wildlife Refuge Bibb County, Alabama
    Water Resource Inventory and Assessment Cahaba River National Wildlife Refuge Bibb County, Alabama U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region Atlanta, Georgia December 2013 Water Resource Inventory and Assessment Cahaba River National Wildlife Refuge Bibb County, Alabama Theresa A. Thom U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Inventory and Monitoring Network Savannah Coastal Refuge Complex, 694 Beech Hill Lane Hardeeville, SC 29927 Rebecca E. Burns Atkins North America, Inc. 5200 Seventy Seven Center Drive, Suite 500 Charlotte, NC 28217 John Faustini U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Southeast Region 1875 Century Blvd., Suite 200 Atlanta, GA 30345 Kirsten J. Hunt Atkins North America, Inc. 1616 East Millbrook Road, Suite 310 Raleigh, NC 27609 December 2013 U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Please cite this publication as: Thom, T.A., R.E. Burns, J. Faustini and K.J. Hunt. 2013. Water Resource Inventory and Assessment (WRIA): Cahaba River National Wildlife Refuge, Bibb County, Alabama, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Southeast Region. Atlanta, Georgia. 102 pp. + appendices. COVER PHOTO: View of the Cahaba River, the heart of Cahaba River National Wildlife Refuge, 2012. Photo credit: Theresa Thom / USFWS. Used by permission. ii Acknowledgements This work was completed in part through contract PO# F11PD00794 between the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Atkins North America, Inc. Information for this report was compiled through coordination with multiple state and federal partners and non‐governmental agencies, including the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), Alabama Department of Environmental Management (ADEM), the Cahaba River Society (ADEM), the Geological Survey of Alabama (GSA), The Nature Conservancy (TNC), the Alabama Aquatic Biodiversity Center (AABC), and the Alabama Innovation Engine.
    [Show full text]
  • A Revised List of the Freshwater Mussels (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Unionida) of the United States and Canada
    Freshwater Mollusk Biology and Conservation 20:33–58, 2017 Ó Freshwater Mollusk Conservation Society 2017 REGULAR ARTICLE A REVISED LIST OF THE FRESHWATER MUSSELS (MOLLUSCA: BIVALVIA: UNIONIDA) OF THE UNITED STATES AND CANADA James D. Williams1*, Arthur E. Bogan2, Robert S. Butler3,4,KevinS.Cummings5, Jeffrey T. Garner6,JohnL.Harris7,NathanA.Johnson8, and G. Thomas Watters9 1 Florida Museum of Natural History, Museum Road and Newell Drive, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA 2 North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences, MSC 1626, Raleigh, NC 27699 USA 3 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 212 Mills Gap Road, Asheville, NC 28803 USA 4 Retired. 5 Illinois Natural History Survey, 607 East Peabody Drive, Champaign, IL 61820 USA 6 Alabama Division of Wildlife and Freshwater Fisheries, 350 County Road 275, Florence, AL 35633 USA 7 Department of Biological Sciences, Arkansas State University, State University, AR 71753 USA 8 U.S. Geological Survey, Wetland and Aquatic Research Center, 7920 NW 71st Street, Gainesville, FL 32653 USA 9 Museum of Biological Diversity, The Ohio State University, 1315 Kinnear Road, Columbus, OH 43212 USA ABSTRACT We present a revised list of freshwater mussels (order Unionida, families Margaritiferidae and Unionidae) of the United States and Canada, incorporating changes in nomenclature and systematic taxonomy since publication of the most recent checklist in 1998. We recognize a total of 298 species in 55 genera in the families Margaritiferidae (one genus, five species) and Unionidae (54 genera, 293 species). We propose one change in the Margaritiferidae: the placement of the formerly monotypic genus Cumberlandia in the synonymy of Margaritifera. In the Unionidae, we recognize three new genera, elevate four genera from synonymy, and place three previously recognized genera in synonymy.
    [Show full text]
  • UPLAND COMBSHELL Scientific Name: Epioblasma Metastriata
    Upland combshell (Epioblasma metastriata) female, 46 mm (1¾ inches). Coosa River, Alabama. Photo by Jason Wisniewski, GA DNR. Specimen provided by the Auburn University Museum courtesy of Dr. Brian Helms. Common Name: UPLAND COMBSHELL Scientific Name: Epioblasma metastriata Conrad Other Commonly Used Names: none Previously Used Scientific Names: none Family: Unionidae Rarity Ranks: GH/SX State Legal Status: Endangered Federal Legal Status: Endangered Description: Shell profile is sub-triangular to trapezoidal with a maximum length of approximately 60 mm (2.4 inches). Umbo positioned slightly anteriorly to middle of valves. Females exhibit extrapallial swelling near the posterior portion of the shell while males tend to be more rounded to ventrally straight. The periostracum is yellowish-brown and often has thin, broken green rays. Pseudocardinal teeth are double in left valve and two short, curved lateral teeth are present in left valve. Umbo cavity typically shallow. Nacre color typically white. Similar Species: Southern combshell (Epioblasma penita). The upland combshell can be distinguished from the southern combshell by the former having a more broadly rounded extrapallial swelling near the posterior margin of the shell. The upland combshell rarely exceeds 60 mm where as the southern combshell can attain lengths of over 70 mm. Habitat: The preferred habitat for this species is poorly documented. However, it has been collected from medium to large rivers with moderate current and gravel or sand substrates. Diet: The diets of unionids are poorly understood but are believed to consist of algae and/or bacteria. Some studies suggest that diets may change throughout the life of a unionid with juveniles collecting organic materials from the substrate though pedal feeding and then developing the ability to filter feed during adulthood.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is the Evidence That Invasive Species Are a Significant Contributor to the Decline Or Loss of Threatened Species? Philip D
    Invasive Species Systematic Review, March 2015 What is the evidence that invasive species are a significant contributor to the decline or loss of threatened species? Philip D. Roberts, Hilda Diaz-Soltero, David J. Hemming, Martin J. Parr, Richard H. Shaw, Nicola Wakefield, Holly J. Wright, Arne B.R. Witt www.cabi.org KNOWLEDGE FOR LIFE Contents Contents .................................................................................................................................. 1 Abstract .................................................................................................................................... 3 Keywords ................................................................................................................................. 4 Definitions ................................................................................................................................ 4 Background .............................................................................................................................. 5 Objective of the review ............................................................................................................ 7 The primary review question: ....................................................................................... 7 Secondary question 1: ................................................................................................. 7 Secondary question 2: ................................................................................................. 7 Methods
    [Show full text]
  • Tentacle Newsletter of the IUCN Species Survival Commission Mollusc Specialist Group ISSN 0958-5079
    Tentacle Newsletter of the IUCN Species Survival Commission Mollusc Specialist Group ISSN 0958-5079 No. 8 July 1998 EDITORIAL The Tokyo Metropolitan Government has shelved its plan to build an airport on the Ogasawaran island of Anijima (see the article by Kiyonori Tomiyama and Takahiro Asami later in this issue of Tentacle). This is a Tentacle as widely as possible, given our limited major conservation success story, and is especially resources. I would therefore encourage anyone with a important for the endemic land snail fauna of the island. concern about molluscs to send me an article, however The international pressure brought to bear on the Tokyo short. It doesn’t take long to pen a paragraph or two. Government came about only as a result of the publicis- Don’t wait until I put out a request for new material; I ing of the issue through the internet and in newsletters really don’t wish to have to beg and plead! Send me and other vehicles, like Tentacle (see issues 6 and 7). The something now, and it will be included in the next issue. committed people who instigated this publicity cam- Again, to reiterate (see editorial in Tentacle 7), I would paign should be proud of their success. But as Drs. like to see articles from all over the world, and in partic- Tomiyama and Asami note, vigilance remains necessary, ular I would like to see more on “Marine Matters”. Don’t as the final decision on the location of the new airport be shy! I make only very minor editorial changes to arti- has not been decided.
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia Ecological Services U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service 2/9/2021 HUC 10 Watershed Report
    Georgia Ecological Services U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service 2/9/2021 HUC 10 Watershed Report HUC 10 Watershed: 0315010306 Lower Oostanaula River HUC 8 Watershed: Oostanaula Counties: Bartow, Chattooga, Floyd, Gordon Major Waterbodies (in GA): Oostanaula River, Woodward Creek, Little Dry Creek, Big Dry Creek, Lovejoy Creek, Dozier Creek, Lake Conasauga Federal Listed Species: (historic, known occurrence, or likely to occur in the watershed) E - Endangered, T - Threatened, C - Candidate, CCA - Candidate Conservation species, PE - Proposed Endangered, PT - Proposed Threatened, Pet - Petitioned, R - Rare, U - Uncommon, SC - Species of Concern. Trispot Darter (Etheostoma trisella) US: T; GA: E Occurrence; Survey period: 1 May - 30 Nov (only when water temperatures are above 10°C). Upland Combshell (Epioblasma metastriata) US: E; GA: E Critical Habitat; No surveys necessary, presumed extirpated from Georgia. Southern Acornshell (Epioblasma othcaloogensis) US: E; GA: E Critical Habitat; No surveys necessary, presumed extirpated from Georgia. Southern Combshell (Epioblasma penita) US: E; GA: E Historical Occurrence; No surveys necessary, presumed extirpated from Georgia. Finelined Pocketbook (Hamiota altilis) US: T; GA: T Critical Habitat; Survey period: year round, when water temperatures are above 10° C and excluding when stage is increasing or above normal. Alabama Moccasinshell (Medionidus acutissimus) US: T; GA: T Critical Habitat; Survey period: year round, when water temperatures are above 10° C and excluding when stage is increasing or above normal. Coosa Moccasinshell (Medionidus parvulus) US: E; GA: E Critical Habitat; Survey period: year round, when water temperatures are above 10° C and excluding when stage is increasing or above normal. Updated: 2/9/2021 0315010306 Lower Oostanaula River 1 Georgia Ecological Services U.S.
    [Show full text]