Banking on Nature 2007

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Banking on Nature 2007 U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service BANKING ON NATURE The Economic Benefits to Local Communities of National Wildlife Refuge Visitation Erin Carver and James Caudill, Ph.D. Division of Economics U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Washington, DC October 2013 Photo courtesy of Nebraska Tourism Table Of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................ i Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 1 Glossary ........................................................................................................................................ 10 Region 1 ........................................................................................................................................ 12 Camas National Wildlife Refuge .......................................................................................... 13 Columbia National Wildlife Refuge ..................................................................................... 16 Conboy Lake National Wildlife Refuge ............................................................................... 19 Dungeness National Wildlife Refuge ................................................................................... 23 Hanford Reach National Monument ..................................................................................... 26 Hart Mountain National Antelope Refuge ............................................................................ 30 Kootenai National Wildlife Refuge ...................................................................................... 34 Little Pend Oreille National Wildlife Refuge ....................................................................... 37 Malheur National Wildlife Refuge ....................................................................................... 40 McNary National Wildlife Refuge ........................................................................................ 43 Nisqually National Wildlife Refuge ..................................................................................... 47 Ridgefield National Wildlife Refuge .................................................................................... 50 Sheldon National Wildlife Refuge ........................................................................................ 54 Steigerwald Lake National Wildlife Refuge ......................................................................... 58 Tualatin River National Wildlife Refuge .............................................................................. 61 Turnbull National Wildlife Refuge ....................................................................................... 64 Willapa National Wildlife Refuge ........................................................................................ 67 Region 2 ........................................................................................................................................ 71 Anahuac National Wildlife Refuge ....................................................................................... 72 Buenos Aires National Wildlife Refuge ............................................................................... 76 Deep Fork National Wildlife Refuge .................................................................................... 80 Hagerman National Wildlife Refuge .................................................................................... 84 Laguna Atascosa National Wildlife Refuge ......................................................................... 88 Las Vegas National Wildlife Refuge .................................................................................... 92 Little River National Wildlife Refuge .................................................................................. 96 McFaddin National Wildlife Refuge .................................................................................. 100 Muleshoe National Wildlife Refuge ................................................................................... 103 Salt Plains National Wildlife Refuge .................................................................................. 107 Trinity River National Wildlife Refuge .............................................................................. 111 Wichita Mountains National Wildlife Refuge .................................................................... 115 Region 3 ...................................................................................................................................... 118 Agassiz National Wildlife Refuge ...................................................................................... 119 Big Oaks National Wildlife Refuge .................................................................................... 123 Crab Orchard National Wildlife Refuge ............................................................................. 127 Cypress Creek National Wildlife Refuge ........................................................................... 131 Horicon National Wildlife Refuge ...................................................................................... 135 Illinois River National Wildlife and Fish Refuges Complex .............................................. 138 Iowa Wetland Management District ................................................................................... 142 Morris Wetland Management District ................................................................................ 145 Squaw Creek National Wildlife Refuge ............................................................................. 149 i Two Rivers National Wildlife Refuge ................................................................................ 152 Union Slough National Wildlife Refuge............................................................................. 156 Upper Mississippi River National Wildlife & Fish Refuge ................................................ 160 Region 4 ...................................................................................................................................... 165 Alligator River National Wildlife Refuge........................................................................... 166 Arthur R. Marshall Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge ............................................... 169 Cache River National Wildlife Refuge ............................................................................... 173 Chickasaw National Wildlife Refuge ................................................................................. 177 Crystal River National Wildlife Refuge ............................................................................. 181 Egmont Key National Wildlife Refuge............................................................................... 184 Felsenthal National Wildlife Refuge .................................................................................. 188 Hobe Sound National Wildlife Refuge ............................................................................... 191 Lower Hatchie National Wildlife Refuge ........................................................................... 195 Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge ............................................................................. 199 Okefenokee National Wildlife Refuge................................................................................ 203 Pea Island National Wildlife Refuge .................................................................................. 207 Pocosin Lakes National Wildlife Refuge ............................................................................ 210 Santee National Wildlife Refuge ........................................................................................ 213 St. Marks National Wildlife Refuge ................................................................................... 217 Waccamaw National Wildlife Refuge ................................................................................ 220 Region 5 ...................................................................................................................................... 223 Assabet River National Wildlife Refuge ............................................................................ 224 Back Bay National Wildlife Refuge ................................................................................... 227 Blackwater National Wildlife Refuge ................................................................................. 230 Canaan Valley National Wildlife Refuge ........................................................................... 233 Eastern Neck National Wildlife Refuge ............................................................................. 236 Eastern Shore of Virginia National Wildlife Refuge .......................................................... 239 Edwin B. Forsythe National Wildlife Refuge ..................................................................... 242 Great Dismal Swamp National Wildlife Refuge ................................................................ 246 Great Swamp National Wildlife Refuge ............................................................................. 250 John Heinz at Tinicum National Wildlife Refuge .............................................................. 254 Maine Coastal Islands National Wildlife
Recommended publications
  • Glen Lake-Crystal River Watershed Management Plan
    GLEN LAKE-CRYSTAL RIVER WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN December 2002 UPDATED FEBRUARY 2009 Written By: Sarah U’Ren, Matt Heiman, Megan Woller For: Glen Lake Association, Friends of the Crystal River, Leelanau Conservancy ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS GLEN LAKE-CRYSTAL RIVER WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN 2009 Update Prepared By: Sarah U’Ren, The Watershed Center Grand Traverse Bay 2002 Edition Prepared By: Matt Heiman and Megan Woller, Leelanau Conservancy 2002 Edition Contributors: Mike Litch, Glen Lake Association Sarah Litch, Glen Lake Assocation Jerry Powley, Glen Lake Association Ed Ricker, Glen Lake Association Rob Karner, The Leelanau School Mike Sutherland, Friends of the Crystal River Mapping: Leelanau Conservancy Layout: Leelanau Conservancy Financial Contributors: Leelanau Conservancy Glen Lake Association Friends of the Crystal River Many thanks to the Glen Lake-Crystal River Watershed Steering Committee and 2009 Edition Contributors: Steve Christensen, Leelanau County Drain Commissioner; Greg Goudy, Michigan Department of Environmental Quality; Matt Heiman, Leelanau Conservancy; Rob Karner, The Leelanau School and Glen Lake Biologist; Mike and Sarah Litch, Glen Lake Association; Vik Theiss, Friends of the Crystal River; Tom Van Zoeren, Friends of the Crystal River; Matt Wisen, Crystal River Outfitters; Steve Yancho, Sleeping Bear Dunes National Lakeshore GLEN LAKE-CRYSTAL RIVER WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN PARTNERS Glen Lake Association Friends of the Crystal River Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Michigan Department of Natural Resources
    [Show full text]
  • Crystal River Restoration Riparian Restoration Plan & Ecological Integrity Assessment Garfield County, Colorado
    CRYSTAL RIVER RESTORATION RIPARIAN RESTORATION PLAN & ECOLOGICAL INTEGRITY ASSESSMENT GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO CRYSTAL RIVER RESTORATION| RIVERFRONT PARK GARFIELD COUNTY. COLORADO AUGUST 2018 Prepared for: The Town of Carbondale Prepared by: DHM Design Corp. and River Restoration 311 Main Street, Suite 102, Carbondale, Colorado 81623 November 2018 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................1 2.0 Methods ..............................................................................................................................................................2 2.1 Site Survey ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 2.2 Channel Stability Assessment ................................................................................................................................................................. 2 2.3 Ecological Integrity Assessment for Colorado Wetlands ............................................................................................................... 2 2.3.1 Existing Conditions Analysis .................................................................................................................................................................... 2 2.3.2 Post-Restoration Assessment .................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Beautiful Glen Arbor Township Has Been Produced by Scanning the Original Paper Edition Published in 1977 (Second Printing; 1983)
    eBook published February 2003 Courtesy of manitoupassage.com eBook Editor’s Notes This transcription of Beautiful Glen Arbor Township has been produced by scanning the original paper edition published in 1977 (second printing; 1983). Printed pages were converted to editable form by optical character recognition (OCR) software, then carefully proofread to correct OCR errors. Obvious spelling, grammar and typographical errors occurring in the original printed edition have also been corrected. The quality of photos and other illustrations in this edition is limited to what could be achieved by scanning the printed versions. Where possible, bitmap graphics have been enhanced using graphics processing software. This eBook version is otherwise a faithful copy of the original printed edition. yyyyy Copyright: No copyright notice appears in this publication. This eBook edition has been created for free distribution. Beautiful Glen Arbor Township Facts, Fantasy & Fotos by Robert Dwight Rader and the GLEN ARBOR HISTORY GROUP Leelanau County, Michigan – 1977 Second Printing – 1983 VILLAGE PRESS (COVER PICTURE: View of Glen Lake taken from Miller’s Hill with Lake Michigan in the distance, the village of Glen Arbor hidden in the trees.) Fisher Mill prologue This book came about as a spin-off of Glen Arbor’s Bicentennial celebration. Gathering infor- mation about historical landmarks for county recognition, locating photos and relics for the mini- museum, tape recording the memories of senior citizens, we re-discovered a vivid past. Many younger members of the community were fasci- nated too. Glen Arbor Township never grew to the greatness of Ann Arbor, or to the fame of other “Glens” and “Harbors” in Michigan.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 Current Conditions
    CHAPTER 3 CURRENT CONDITIONS This chapter presents information on the characteristics of land, natural features and buildings in Glen Arbor Township. It is based in part on the General Characteristics section in the 1984 Plan, but contains updates and additional information. Land Overview Glen Arbor Township consists of a total area of land and inland lakes, rivers and streams of approximately 39 square miles (22,607 acres). Of this, South Manitou Island is 5,286 acres and rests about 6 miles from the closest mainland point and for most people is accessed by ferry from Leland. The Sleeping Bear Dunes National Lakeshore accounts for 75 percent of the area, (and includes South Manitou Island) and Big and Little Glen Lakes another 17 percent. The privately owned land area of the Township amounts to only about 3,800 acres (almost six square miles). The characteristics that are most representative of the Township include the waterfronts of Glen Lake and Lake Michigan, the Sleeping Bear Dunes, the Crystal River, high hills and steep hillsides and the extensive tree vegetation. These natural features have influenced the major land use patterns in the Township. Residential development is most evident around the Glen Lakes, Fisher Lakes, Lake Michigan, and on high hills, while Glen Arbor village, the Homestead and the Leelanau School are the only concentrations of development. As elsewhere, residential development is attracted to the waterfront for the visual beauty, recreation and serenity associated with it. Glen Arbor Township Future Land Use Plan March 2013 3-1 Land Use by Property Class Map 3-1 show land use by the classifications used by the Michigan MCL in 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Glen Lake - Crystal River Hydrologic Assessment Leelanau County, Michigan
    GLEN LAKE - CRYSTAL RIVER HYDROLOGIC ASSESSMENT LEELANAU COUNTY, MICHIGAN Prepared for Leelanau County Circuit Court - Technical Committee National Park Service Leelanau County Drain Commissioner Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Crystal River Preservation Association Glen Lake Association Prepared by Hope Croskey, P.E. Gary F. Croskey, P.E., LLC Steve Miller, P.E., MTO, LLC November 2009 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We thank the following Technical Committee representatives for their support in completing this hydrologic assessment of the Glen Lake and Crystal River Hydrology. Steve Yancho, National Park Service Steve Christenson, Leelanau County Drain Commissioner Mike Stifler, Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) Vik Theiss, Crystal River Preservation Association Jim Dutmers, Glen Lake Association (GLA) John Kassarjin, GLA Water Level Committee In addition, we have enjoyed and appreciated the assistance of Marlio Lesmez, MDEQ Hydrologic Studies Unit Chief for his review of the groundwater watershed delineation; Bill Klein, Michigan State University Northwest Michigan Horticulture Research Station, for his dedication to collecting pan evaporation data; and Vik Theiss for his time in providing exceedingly large volumes of documentation, records, and data needed for completion of this project. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures .............................................................................................................................................. iii List of Tables ..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Here to Enlighten
    Glen Arbor Sun Here to Enlighten You June 3, 2021 Volume XXVI, Issue V Covering Leelanau County Events, Characters, Businesses and the Arts www.GlenArbor.com FREE! Livelys expand farm, launch Backyard Burdickville campground By Norm Wheeler there are 50 shares spoken for! CSA, or Com- Sun editor munity Supported Agriculture, is a common model on small farms that connects the farmer The scent of cinnamon suffuses the and customer in a unique way. Customers buy air. Is this a spice shop? A tea emporium? “shares” of a farm’s harvest in advance and then Nope, it’s Jane Lively’s hoop house shed receive a portion of the crops as they’re har- for sprouting seedlings at the Lively vested. This model provides farmers important Farm off Bow Road above Burdickville. early-season capital and a guaranteed market Dozens of plastic pots line the shelves, for their produce. all sprinkled with the red spice that kills But Jane’s ambition doesn’t stop there. Her any bacteria in the soil, thus enhancing flowers and produce are also sold at the Em- germination. It’s just one more sign of pire Farmer’s Market on Saturdays in summer, the phenomenal growth occurring within and at the Grow Benzie Market on Mondays. the Lively family’s many new business Plus, Jane has an initiative to help feed “10 ventures that include the Lively Farm, or more” local migrant families. “We are still the Backyard Burdickville Campground, raising funds for these community supported and the next LivelyLands weekend music shares,” Jane explains.
    [Show full text]
  • Winetrail Kicked Off by a Unique (Optional) Walk Or Run Through the Vineyards
    Maps • Guide • Events Annual Wine Events SMALL PLATES August 18, 2016 Progressive dinner of gourmet tapas facebook.com/leelanauwine and wine in the vineyards & tasting rooms. Leelanau Peninsula HARVEST STOMPEDE twitter.com/lpwines September 10 & 11, 2016 Cheers to harvest! Enjoy wine and food pairings Saturday, June 25, 2016 instagram.com/lpwines/ WineTrail kicked off by a unique (optional) walk or run through the vineyards. Free Leelanau Wine Phone App lpwines.com/app/ THE HUNT FOR THE REDS OF OCTOBER October 2016 Discover great red wines with featured pours weekdays during the month benefiting the American Red Cross. TOAST THE SEASON November 5 & 6, 12 & 13, 2016 Celebrate Leelanau-style during this holiday tradition of food, wine and gifts. SIPS & SOUPS January 21, 2017 Warm up with delicious pairings of wine and soup, benefiting Leelanau food banks. TASTE THE PASSION February 11 & 12, 2017 Indulge in wine paired with sweet and savory fare, where chocolate is the main course. SIPS, CHIPS & DIPS March 18, 2017 Enjoy fun and casual wine tasting paired with complimentary everyday snacks. Join the Traverse City Wine & Art Festival SPRING SIP & SAVOR to celebrate wine, food, art and May 6 & 7, 2017 culture of northern Michigan. Explore local wine and food pairings and Indulge in local flavors with wines and win big in the Sip o’ de Mayo Hat Contest. foods grown in the region. Chat with Leelanau Peninsula Wine Trail winemakers with fun wine experiences. 10781 East Cherry Bend Road, Studio 1 Experience Leelanau Peninsula And, be inspired by magnificent fine art. Traverse City, Michigan 49684 (231) 642-5550 | [email protected] | www.lpwines.com www.lpwines.com traversecitywinefestival.com Cover photography by Tony Demin Welcome to the Leelanau Peninsula Wine Region Leelanau Peninsula is a paradise for vacationers and residents alike.
    [Show full text]
  • Glen Lake, Leelanau County, Michigan
    Michigan Dept. of Natural Resources and Environment 2010-100 Status of the Fishery Resource Report Page 1 Glen Lake Chain (Glen, Little Glen, Big Fisher, Little Fisher, and Tucker Lakes) Leelanau County (T29N, R14W/15W, Multiple Sections) Heather Seites, Mark Tonello, and Todd Kalish Environment The Glen Lake watershed is located in Leelanau County, Michigan, in the northwest Lower Peninsula. This watershed drains approximately 46 square miles of land or 29,721 acres (U'Ren et al. 2009). Within this watershed there are five distinct basins; Little Glen Lake (1,450 acres),Glen Lake (4,865 acres), Big Fisher Lake (42 acres), Little Fisher Lake, and Tucker Lake (15 acres) (Figure 1). For the purpose of this report, Big Fisher and Little Fisher Lakes will be collectively referred to as Fisher Lake. Additionally there are two small ponds in the watershed, Day Mill Pond and Brooks Lake. Day Mill Pond (7 acres) is located on the northwestern shore of Little Glen Lake and drains into the lake through a small stream, while Brooks Lake (10 acres) flows in through a small creek on the eastern shore of Glen Lake. The primary inlet to the Glen Lake system is Hatlem Creek, which flows into the southern end of Glen Lake near the intersection of County Roads 616 and 675. The primary outlet to the Glen Lake system is the Crystal River, which discharges into Sleeping Bear Bay on Lake Michigan. Little Glen Lake and Hatlem Creek both drain into Glen Lake, which itself drains into Big Fisher Lake then Little Fisher Lake before finally flowing into the Crystal River.
    [Show full text]
  • National Water Summary Wetland Resources: Michigan
    National Water Summary-Wetland Resources 231 Michigan Wetland Resources Wtlands cover about 15 percent of Michigan. They are ecologi­ There is no current ( 1993) estimate of statewide wetland acre­ cally and economically valuable to the State. Wetlands provide shore­ age in each of the systems. However, the Michigan Department of line protection as well as temporary flood storage. Wetlands pro­ Natural Resources has inventoried land cover and land use; the re­ tect water quality by removing excess nutrients and sediments from sult is the Michigan Resource Inventory System (MIRIS). Wetland surface and ground water. Michigan's wetlands, such as Tobico classifications were developed specifically for this inventory sys­ Marsh shown in figure I, provide important wildlife habitat and have tem. Classes of wetlands under this scheme are lowland conifers, a significant role in maintaining a high level of biological diversity. 1.826,402 acres; lowland hardwoods, 2,484,430 acres; wooded Most freshwater fi sh depend on wetlands at some stage in their life wetland, 263,684 acres (palustrine forested wetlands under the cycle. Birds use wetlands as migratory resting places, fo r breeding Coward in and others L1 979] classification system); shrub/scrub wet­ and feeding grounds, and as cover from predators. Wetlands, such land, I, 186,150 acres (palustrine scrub-shrub wetlands); aquatic­ as those in Seney National Wildlife Refuge, are a preferred habitat bed wetland, 60,863 acres (rooted and floating vascul ar aquatic-bed for muskrat, beaver, otter, mink, and raccoon. Some rare or threat­ wetlands); emergent wetland, 4 I 9,061 acres (persistent- and non­ ened animals rely on wetl ands, and 9 1 of 238 plant species listed as persistent-emergent wetlands; and unvegetated flats, 3,926 acres threatened or endangered by the State grow in wetland habitats (unconsolidated-shore wetlands).
    [Show full text]
  • EELANEWS Spring 2015 Learning Outside the Classroom Life Skills in Action LIFE SKILLS EDUCATION a Recent Leelanau by KRISTIE MCCAW Grad’S Testimonial
    EELANEWS Spring 2015 Learning outside the classroom Life skills in action LIFE SKILLS EDUCATION A recent Leelanau BY KRISTIE MCCAW grad’s testimonial college preparatory boarding school an integrated life skills program which BY J.D. FRILEY is, as its name suggests, a place to addresses support of students’ needs in a A prepare students for college. Of course comprehensive wellness model which is At The Leelanau School, we work with the academic success is a major part of designed to be developmentally appro- “whole student” and connect all aspects that preparedness, but another equally priate and effective for our students’ lives of a student’s life to help them succeed. important part is the development of both now and in their futures! We spend countless hours during study life skills. These are the skills that will For each student at The Leelanau hall reinforcing why & how to use a planner, and tactfully share (whenever allow success in college, and beyond, School, life skills are taught through necessary) how better hygiene can to happen. The skills that are essen- everything they do. On an individual increase social acceptance. Sometimes tial to building, navigating, and living level, students complete a residential these lessons take months or years to successful and meaningful lives. Taking life curriculum, which focuses on the sink in and many relapses often occur. personal responsibility, learning to development of executive function, Internalization (making habit) only comes manage emotions, developing social including time management, organi- from consistency and it can take a variety awareness, and practicing personal zation, self-care, problem solving, and of attempts to find ways these lessons will wellness are examples of life skills that conflict resolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Master Plan 3-1-2013
    Glen Arbor Township FUTURE LAND USE PLAN Prepared Under the Direction of the Glen Arbor Township Planning and Zoning Commission By the Planning & Zoning Center, Inc. 715 N. Cedar Street Lansing, MI 48906-5206 517/886-0555 Ph. 517/886-0564 Fax www.pzcenter.com Adopted by the Glen Arbor Township Planning and Zoning Commission on February 1, 2005 Adopted by the Glen Arbor Township Board on February 15, 2005 GLEN ARBOR TOWNSHIP PLANNING and ZONING COMMISSION Lance Roman, Chairman Terry Gretzema, Vice-Chairman Kent Kelly, Township Trustee Joel Drake Jim Seeburger Lois Saltsman Frank Wilcox William S. Olson Bob Hawley, Zoning Administrator PLANNING & ZONING CENTER, INC. ASSOCIATES Mark A. Wyckoff, FAICP, President John Warbach, Ph.D., Principal David Struck, Associate Planner Carolyn A. Freebury, Vice President GLEN ARBOR TOWNSHIP PLANNING and ZONING COMMISSION Master Plan Update March 2013 Lance Roman, Chairman John Peppler, Vice-Chairman Kent Kelly, Township Trustee Fred Missad Paul Walters Lois Saltsman William Stege Bob Hawley, Zoning Administrator TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1: Introduction & Regional Setting ................................................................... 1-1 Introduction......................................................................................................................... 1-1 Plan and Relationship to Zoning......................................................................................... 1-3 Public Input........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Leelanau School Head of School Opportunity Statement
    The Leelanau School Head of School Opportunity Statement The Leelanau School seeks an experienced educational leader who will embrace the school’s mission and can create and implement plans for a successful future. The Leelanau School was founded in 1929 in Glen Arbor, Michigan by Skipper and Cora Beals and Major and Helen Huey. Leelanau is known for its project-based, experiential learning strategies for bright, college bound students. These hands-on learning strategies are ideal for students with ADHD or executive function challenges and for students who want to build their confidence, learning Mission Statement: skills and awareness. Well ahead of its time, The Leelanau The Leelanau School ignites a passion School has stayed true to the philosophy for the past 88 for learning in a boarding school years that “doing a lesson” greatly enhances learning. where students thrive by engaging The Leelanau School’s wooded 42-acre campus sits on academically and by celebrating the shore of Lake Michigan and is adjacent to National everyone’s unique learning styles in Park lands providing exceptional support for Leelanau’s a culture of acceptance, leading to approach to student engagement and learning through successful and meaningful lives in curricular, co-curricular and recreational activities. college and beyond. Educational Philosophy: The Leelanau School uses multi-sensory, experiential, and strength-based methodologies that make rigorous academics attainable. Students gain awareness of their personal learning styles, build skills and strategies to maximize their learning potential and grow into confident, independent young adults. Supportive relationships are formed to establish trust and create a safe environment where students can take educational risks.
    [Show full text]