The Word Nigger As Racialized and Non- Racialized: a Foucauldian Discourse Analysis on the N-Word in a Canadian Society

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Word Nigger As Racialized and Non- Racialized: a Foucauldian Discourse Analysis on the N-Word in a Canadian Society 16 Journal of Undergraduate Ethnic Minority Psychology - ISSN 2332-9300 Volume 3, 2017 The Word Nigger as Racialized and Non- Racialized: A Foucauldian Discourse Analysis on the N-Word in a Canadian Society Bukun F. Adegbembo Colleen MacQuarrie, Ph.D. University of Prince Edward Island Abstract The present study addresses the ongoing issues around the reappropriation of the n-word in the Canadian context. It sought to find if, and how easily, slurs and language can change their meaning over time. While some prior studies viewed the n- word as too hateful to ever be used by anyone (Embrick & Henricks, 2013), other authors believed that it should only be used by Blacks (Galinsky, Hugenberg, Groom, & Bodenhausen, 2003), and yet others claimed that it has taken on a new meaning and can be used by anyone in society (Croom, 2013). An article titled Quebec considers removing N-word from 11 place names and its corresponding comments, which were posted on the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation website (http://www.cbc.ca), were used as data for this present study. The current research used Foucauldian Discourse Analysis to investigate both the discourses surrounding the n-word as well as power relations that emerged in those discourses. The two emergent discourses from this study were the Acknowledgement Discourse: Nigger is Racialized, and the Denial Discourse: Nigger is Non-Racialized. The subject positions created from both discourses, which were the privileged and unprivileged, used language in ways that either reinscribed or challenged White privilege. Through the language, word choice and tones used, comments exemplified the complex and complicated nature of the n-word and showed society's inability to come to a consensus on its meaning and use. Keywords: nigger, nigga, n-word, Foucaldian Discourse Analysis INTRODUCTION been transformed into having a less violent definition and into a general term of endearment. The way of spelling the I n his book, Tupac: Resurrection, 1971-1996, Tupac expression nigga versus nigger is usually the way to wrote, “Niggers was the ones on the rope, hanging off the differentiate between the two meanings, with nigga being thing. Niggas is the ones with gold ropes, hanging out at the positive term (Neal, 2013). As Neal (2013) stated, while clubs” (Shakur, Shakur, Hoye, Ali & Einenkel, 2003, p. the term nigger refers to “an embodiment of Black racial 155). This quote highlights the complexity of the word subjects in the pre-20th century South”, the word nigga nigger and its derivative, nigga. The terminology nigger “relates to concepts of [Blackness] as mobile, fluid, was first used to refer negatively to Black people, adaptable, postmodern [and] urban” (p. 557) perpetuating stereotypes that they are intellectually and How can a word come to have opposite definitions, morally inferior, animal-like, undeserving of humanity and and who determines which definition is at work each time other such negative beliefs (Embrick & Henricks, 2013; the word is said? In the following paragraphs, I will explore Croom, 2013). Within the Black community, this word has how a word can be viewed as both a slur and a term of Manuscript received September 2016. 1Bukun Adegbembo is a recent graduate from the University of Prince Edward Island (495 York Point Road Cornwall, PE, Canada C0A 1H4; [email protected]). 2 Colleen MacQuarrie is a Professor in the Department of Psychology at the University of Prince Edward Island (550 University Avenue, Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Canada, C1A, 4P3; [email protected]). 17 Journal of Undergraduate Ethnic Minority Psychology - ISSN 2332-9300 Volume 3, 2017 endearment. In examining this, I will discuss the ideas and Blacks’ use of the terms. By classifying the word thoughts behind language being both productive and ever- nigger, as a slur, we can connect it to the idea of changing. My approach will illustrate the intricacies and reappropriation. Galinsky et al., (2003) defined complexities that restrict the term nigger from having a reappropriation as taking "possession for oneself that which universal definition. I will begin this exploration by first was once possessed by another " (p. 222). Reappropriation discussing the history of the terms nigger and nigga, leading occurs when a stigmatized group purposefully refers to into the reappropriation of the term nigger by Blacks to themselves with the stigmatized label used by those in the understand both the positive and negative effects of the out-group (Galinsky et al., 2003). Galinsky et al. (2003) intra-racial use of a slur. Following this section, I will take a described the 3-step model for reappropriating a word in which an individual self-labels with the slur (step 1), which look into the use of the term nigger by Whites in an attempt leads to collective self-labeling (step 2), and eventually, a to claim that the word is non-racialized and that its positive meaning of the word is formed (step 3) (Galinsky historical meaning has transformed. This analysis of the et al., 2003). According to Galinsky et al. (2003), it is term nigger will be followed by an introduction to the possible to reappropriate a stigmatized word because what present study in which I will show that the tethering is classed as a stigma is ever-changing, socially constructed approach to the phrases nigger and nigga continues across and "contextually sensitive” (p. 223). By viewing slurs as the border and into Canada. negotiable, people can better understand the possibility of This paper will use the words, nigger and nigga reappropriating them. interchangeably, rather than using the socially and It follows that "individuals ensuring their own order politically correct phrase, "n-word", in order to reflect the is a form of power" (Foucault, 1994 p. 66). Therefore, the terms’ conversational and controversial use in society. It ability of those within the disadvantaged group to self-label must be noted that the way of spelling the reappropriated in order to ‘ensure their own order’ is seen as a reflection of version of the term nigger, as nigga, is more contained and their power. Jacobs (2011) stated that "to proclaim oneself understood within the hip-hop community but has not yet a nigger is to declare to the disapproving mainstream 'You been as widely recognized in the scholarly world (Neal, can't fire me. I quit' […] To growl that one is a nigga is a 2013; Jacobs, 2011). What this means is that though seductive gesture…that can feel bitterly empowering" (p. scholars have written about the reappropriation of the word 12). nigger, they maintain the spelling as nigger and not nigga. Internalized oppression. Though many authors have This paper will use the term similarly to show both the discussed the creation and redistribution of power in vitriol use and its reappropriated format but will employ the reappropriation, others question whether power is truly created. Such that, self-labelling may be a manifestation of word nigga to stress and reflect when it is being the ideologies of White supremacy instead (hooks, 1989). reappropriated by and amongst Blacks, especially Blacks Due to the negative history of the word, nigger, its intra- who subscribe to the hip-hop subculture. racial use is viewed by some as a type of self-hatred (Embrick & Henricks, 2013). Fanon referred to this LITERATURE REVIEW reproduction of White supremacy and White power ideologies by Blacks as internalized oppression. He wrote Origin: Nigger as a Slur that the pervasive nature of Whiteness as superior not only The terms nigger, Negro and nigga are said to derive subjects Blacks to its ideologies, but also manifests itself from the Latin word niger which means black (Fogle, within how they (Blacks) come to think of themselves and 2013). According to Fogle (2013), the word nigger began their place in society (Fanon & Markmann, 2008). When being used to both psychologically and publicly put down Blacks use the phrase nigga, towards themselves, they slaves, who did not have property, funds, or legal rights in "crystalize [their] group's location" within the racial and the 18th century (Fogle, 2013). Slurs, as defined by Croom social order (Embrick and Henricks, 2013 p. 211). In other (2013), are terms or labels used to derogate certain groups words, some authors saw no difference between the and their members. Slurs represent negative attitudes about terminology nigger (the slur) and nigga (the reappropriated groups and are uttered with the intent to offend the target term); both versions were stigmatized labels regardless of group (Anderson & Lepore, 2011). The phrase, nigger, is a the speaker. slur because it goes beyond being a descriptive term and Whites’ use of the terms. Embrick and Henricks "[imposes] contempt on [Blacks] as an inferior race" (2013) believed that when it came to the word, nigger, there (Easton, 2007, p. 40). Rahman (2012) wrote that the term was no time it could be used positively as they saw it as far nigger carries the stereotype of "moral and intellectual too insular and its history far too tainted to be inferiority” (p. 158) and when used as a label towards a reappropriated. Croom (2014), on the other hand, argued Black person, stigmatizes them as having "subhuman characteristics" (p. 143). against this and believed that "linguistic expressions are open to semantic evolution and renegotiation", (p. 149) Reappropriation regardless of the word or term in question. He stated that we must move to a place where both Whites and Blacks can 18 Journal of Undergraduate Ethnic Minority Psychology - ISSN 2332-9300 Volume 3, 2017 use the term nigger freely, as “linguistic expressions are not society (Madrigal and Tejeda, 2009). By engaging in such a rigidly fixated on points of the past” (Croom, 2014, p. 149). process that allows them to truly evaluate and acknowledge According to the reappropriation model by Galinsky their privilege as opposed to erasing the history of certain et al., (2003), the final step and proof of successful words as a way to present those words as neutral, Whites reappropriation occurs when both the out-group and in- can be effective allies.
Recommended publications
  • Alternative Spelling and Censorship: the Treatment of Profanities in Virtual Communities Laura-Gabrielle Goudet
    Alternative spelling and censorship: the treatment of profanities in virtual communities Laura-Gabrielle Goudet To cite this version: Laura-Gabrielle Goudet. Alternative spelling and censorship: the treatment of profanities in virtual communities. Aspects of Linguistic Impoliteness, 2013. hal-02119772 HAL Id: hal-02119772 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02119772 Submitted on 4 May 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Alternative spelling and censorship: the treatment of profanities in virtual communities Laura-Gabrielle Goudet Université Paris 13, Sorbonne Paris Cité [email protected] [Author’s version of a paper published in Aspects of Linguistic Impoliteness (2013), Cambridge Scholars Publishing] Introduction Discourse on the internet is characterized by the paradoxical ability of users to write and communicate in alternative ways, with minimal supervision or external regularization—in most, not all communities—while new norms arise and are replaced according to users of virtual communities. On most websites, there is no regulating organ, except the Terms of Service that every registered user has to abide by. The standard version (used on websites like Facebook) includes a clause stipulating that the user should not: “use the Services […] to : upload, post, transmit, share, […] any User content [deemed] harmful, threatening, unlawful, defamatory, infringing, abusive, inflammatory, harassing, vulgar, obscene, […] hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable”.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction: Memories of Slavery
    INTRODUCTION MEMORIES OF SLAVERY On 27 April 1848, the Second Republic abolished slavery in its French overseas colonies thus ending three centuries of African slave trade and forced plantation labor. One hundred fifty years later the government of the Fifth Republic for the first time or- ganized extensive official celebrations to commemorate this historic event. The past was resurrected, invading the present with countless memories—though undoubtedly not the same for the French nation and for the formerly enslaved popula- tions in the overseas départements of Guadeloupe, Martinique, French Guiana, and Reunion.1 The governmental commemorations of April 1998 were varied and all took place in France. President Jacques Chirac gave an opening speech, Prime Minister Lionel Jospin hon- ored the abolitionary fervor of the small village of Champag- ney, various ministers presented plaques commemorating important abolitionary figures and French Caribbean artists were invited for a variety of artistic performances. The over- seas domains also organized their own local commemorative functions including exhibitions, conferences, and theater pro- ductions as well as the inauguration of memorials. In Mar- tinique, for instance, scenes of the slave trade were reenacted with the arrival of a slave vessel, the unloading of slaves, and the reconstitution of a slave market. In Guadeloupe, a flame honoring the memory of the nèg mawon (fugitive slave) passed from township to township during the entire year preceding the 150th anniversary and was returned to its starting point amid celebrations, dances, and traditional music. 2 Catherine Reinhardt The most revealing aspects of the commemoration lie in the articles of major French and French Caribbean newspapers such as Le Monde, Libération, Le Figaro, and France-Antilles writ- ten for the occasion.
    [Show full text]
  • “Ain't Gonna Worry No More”: Depictions of the American South In
    “Ain’t Gonna Worry No More”: Depictions of the American South in Randy Newman’s Good Old Boys Kate Coleman, B.A. Submitted in partial requirement for Special Honors in the Department of English The University of Texas at Austin May 2017 _____________________________________________________ Professor Coleman Hutchison Department of English Supervising Faculty _____________________________________________________ Professor Matthew Valentine Plan II Honors Second Reader Abstract Randy Newman’s album Good Old Boys (1974) is a southern concept album. Newman employs several narrators on the album in order to explore multiple perspectives and elements that illuminate southern identity. Newman’s observations result in a view of the South as disenfranchised, defeated not only by their regional prejudice and own mistakes, but by moral hypocrisy and abandonment from the rest of the United States. In implicating the rest of the country, Newman indicates that the struggles highlighted in the South and southern identity are not simply a result of regional dynamics, but indicative of larger American dynamics. What’s more, many of Newman’s observations and commentary withstand the test of time, and maintain relevance to political and social dynamics still present today. In providing biographical, historical, social, and musical context, as well as close-reading the album, the thesis not only explores Newman’s methods, but argues for his larger goals. Through analyzing and engaging with reviews of the album, both contemporary and modern, this thesis establishes Good Old Boys’ lasting relevance and legacy. i For my father, who not only taught me how to listen, but encouraged me to speak. ii Acknowledgements Never thought I’d make it, but I always do somehow.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Language, Ideology, and Identity in a High School Sorority Sara Lide University of South Carolina - Columbia
    University of South Carolina Scholar Commons Theses and Dissertations 12-15-2014 Southern Language, Ideology, and Identity in a High School Sorority Sara Lide University of South Carolina - Columbia Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd Part of the Linguistics Commons Recommended Citation Lide, S.(2014). Southern Language, Ideology, and Identity in a High School Sorority. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/3034 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you by Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Southern Language, Ideology, and Identity in a High School Sorority by Sara Lide Bachelor of Arts Rice University, 2006 Master of Arts Lancaster University, 2007 Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics College of Arts and Sciences University of South Carolina 2014 Accepted by: Elaine Chun, Major Professor Tracey Weldon, Committee Member Jennifer Reynolds, Committee Member Christine Mallinson, Committee Member Lacy Ford, Vice Provost and Dean of Graduate Studies © Copyright by Sara Lide, 2014 All Rights Reserved. ii Acknowledgements I cannot possibly acknowledge everyone who has helped me through this long process, and I could certainly not do so adequately. Instead, I offer these few words of gratitude. I am thankful for my committee, Jennifer Reynolds, Tracey Weldon, Christine Mallinson, and especially my advisor, Elaine Chun, and for their guidance, advice, and encouragement along the way. My weekly meetings with Julia McKinney and Sandra Keller helped me in so many ways: thank you for the intellectual and moral support that extended far outside the bounds of those meetings.
    [Show full text]
  • Slut Pride: the Reappropriation Attempt by Slutwalk
    Quercus: Linfield Journal of Undergraduate Research Volume 2 Article 3 2016 Slut Pride: The Reappropriation Attempt by SlutWalk Siena C. Noe Linfield College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.linfield.edu/quercus Recommended Citation Noe, Siena C. (2016) "Slut Pride: The Reappropriation Attempt by SlutWalk," Quercus: Linfield Journal of Undergraduate Research: Vol. 2 , Article 3. Available at: https://digitalcommons.linfield.edu/quercus/vol2/iss1/3 This Article is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It is brought to you for free via open access, courtesy of DigitalCommons@Linfield, with permission from the rights-holder(s). Your use of this Article must comply with the Terms of Use for material posted in DigitalCommons@Linfield, or with other stated terms (such as a Creative Commons license) indicated in the record and/or on the work itself. For more information, or if you have questions about permitted uses, please contact [email protected]. Slut Pride: The Reappropriation Attempt by SlutWalk Acknowledgements Thanks to Brenda DeVore Marshall for her perpetual patience, guidance, and enthusiasm. This article is available in Quercus: Linfield Journal of Undergraduate Research: https://digitalcommons.linfield.edu/ quercus/vol2/iss1/3 Noe: Slut Pride SLUT PRIDE: THE REAPPROPRIATION ATTEMPT BY SLUTWALK A slew of scantily clad women marching through the streets shouting obscenities like “Slut, slut! Ho, ho! Yes means yes! No means no!” may seem a little unusual especially if the women are known to hold “respectable” positions and lead otherwise “respectable” lives. So what exactly is going on? The first SlutWalk took place in Toronto, Ontario, Canada in 2011, its idea conceived from feminist ideology and ignited by a comment made by Toronto Police officer, Constable Michael Sanguinetti.
    [Show full text]
  • A Queer Liberation Movement? a Qualitative Content Analysis of Queer Liberation Organizations, Investigating Whether They Are Building a Separate Social Movement
    Portland State University PDXScholar Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses Summer 8-13-2015 A Queer Liberation Movement? A Qualitative Content Analysis of Queer Liberation Organizations, Investigating Whether They are Building a Separate Social Movement Joseph Nicholas DeFilippis Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Studies Commons, and the Social Work Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation DeFilippis, Joseph Nicholas, "A Queer Liberation Movement? A Qualitative Content Analysis of Queer Liberation Organizations, Investigating Whether They are Building a Separate Social Movement" (2015). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 2466. https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.2464 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. A Queer Liberation Movement? A Qualitative Content Analysis of Queer Liberation Organizations, Investigating Whether They are Building a Separate Social Movement by Joseph Nicholas DeFilippis A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Social Work and Social Research Dissertation Committee: Ben Anderson-Nathe, Chair Laura Nissen Stephanie Wahab Sally McWilliams Portland State University 2015 © 2015 Joseph Nicholas DeFilippis i Abstract In the last forty years, U.S. national and statewide LGBT organizations, in pursuit of “equality” through a limited and focused agenda, have made remarkably swift progress moving that agenda forward.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconceptualizing the Debate Over Linguistic Reclamation Robin Brontsema University of Colorado at Boulder
    Brontsema: A Queer Revolution A Queer Revolution: Reconceptualizing the Debate Over Linguistic Reclamation Robin Brontsema University of Colorado at Boulder The debate over linguistic reclamation, the appropriation of a pejorative epithet by its target(s), is generally conceived of as a simple binary of support and opposition. I offer an alternative conceptualization that shows both the complex contrasts and commonalities within the debate. Specifically, I identify three perspectives: (1) that the term is inseparable from its pejoration and therefore its reclamation is opposed; (2) that it is separable from its pejoration and therefore its reclamation is supported; and (3) that it is inseparable from its pejoration and therefore its reclamation is supported. Additionally, by examining different goals within and across reclamations, I demonstrate the difficulty of assigning a fixed outcome of success or failure. Although the term queer serves as the primary case study, the terms black, nigger, cunt, and dyke supplement and expand the discussion from a specific study of queer to linguistic reclamation in general. 1. Introduction Hate speech intended to disable its target simultaneously enables its very resistance; its injurious power is the same fuel that feeds the fire of its counter-appropriation. Laying claim to the forbidden, the word as weapon is taken up and taken back by those it seeks to shackle—a self-emancipation that defies hegemonic linguistic ownership and the (ab)use of power. Linguistic reclamation, also known as linguistic resignification or reappropriation, refers to the appropriation of a pejorative epithet by its target(s). The linguist Melinda Yuen-Ching Chen offers the following definition: “The term ‘reclaiming’ refers to an array of theoretical and conventional interpretations of both linguistic and non-linguistic collective acts in which a derogatory sign or signifier is consciously employed by the ‘original’ target of the derogation, often in a positive or oppositional sense” (1998:130).
    [Show full text]
  • Trump, the KKK, and the Versatility of White Supremacy Rhetoric
    Journal of Contemporary Rhetoric, Vol. 8, No.1/2, 2018, pp. 44-56. Trump, the KKK, and the Versatility of White Supremacy Rhetoric James Chase Sanchez This article theorizes the use of rhetorical versatility as a language tool for white supremacists in the age of Donald Trump, specifically referring to the ways Trump and the KKK speak to their various audiences through textual winks and polysemy. After demonstrating the recent rise of white supremacist groups in this country, rhetorical versatility is explored as way for rhetors to camouflage and signal their ideological viewpoints, which ultimately leads to an analysis of key terms and ideas that both the KKK and Trump utilize in the public sphere: “patriotism,” “heritage,” and “security.” Diving into the specific uses of these terms, this article pinpoints the textual winks that have con- structed a civic version of white supremacy over the last few years. Ultimately, this analysis not only builds a theory of rhetorical versatility but also argues that we need more scholarship on the tacit forms of white supremacy. Keywords: white supremacy, Donald Trump, KKK, rhetorical versatility, textual winks, rhetorical climates On Memorial Day weekend in 2017, residents of Texas City, Texas, a small town in Galveston County, found odd pieces of mail in their front yards—flyers from a local Ku Klux Klan (KKK) group. The white supremacist propaganda1 was placed inside small plastic bags and weighted down with Twizzlers and Kit-Kat bars. The actual flyers contained different slogans and text, rhet- oric seeking to recruit new members to the Loyal White Knights’s KKK chapter.
    [Show full text]
  • Slurs, Stereotypes, and In-Equality: a Critical Review of “How Epithets and Stereotypes Are Racially Unequal”
    Language Sciences xxx (2014) 1–16 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Language Sciences journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/langsci Slurs, stereotypes, and in-equality: a critical review of “How Epithets and Stereotypes are Racially Unequal” Adam M. Croom* Department of Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania, 619 Williams Hall, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States Department of Philosophy, University of Pennsylvania, 433 Cohen Hall, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States article info abstract Article history: Are racial slurs always offensive and are racial stereotypes always negative? How, if at all, Available online xxx are racial slurs and stereotypes different and unequal for members of different races? Questions like these and others about slurs and stereotypes have been the focus of much Keywords: research and hot debate lately, and in a recent article Embrick and Henricks (2013) aimed Slurs to address some of the aforementioned questions by investigating the use of racial slurs Stereotypes and stereotypes in the workplace. Embrick and Henricks (2013) drew upon the empirical Re-appropriation data they collected at a baked goods company in the southwestern United States to argue Semantics exclude minorities but Pragmatics that racial slurs and stereotypes function as symbolic resources that Philosophy of language not whites from opportunities or resources and that racial slurs and stereotypes are necessarily considered as negative or derogatory irrespective of their particular context of use (pp. 197–202). They thus proposed an account of slurs and stereotypes that supports the context-insensitive position of Fitten (1993) and Hedger (2013) yet challenges the context- sensitive position of Kennedy (2002) and Croom (2011).
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf Matias, C
    . “And Our Feelings Just Don’t Feel It Anymore”: Re-Feeling Whiteness, Resistance, and Emotionality Inclusion Cheryl E. Matias, Ph.D. University of Colorado, Denver Social Equity andSocial Equity Abstract To effectively deliver racially just projects, we must theoretically understand from where emotional resistance to them stems, why this resistance is regularly expressed, and what role it plays in stifling antiracism. This theoretical interpretative paper examines how emotional investment in whiteness recycles normative behaviors of white resistance and unveils how it painfully reinforce the supremacy of whiteness. Using a black feminist approach to emotionality and an atrix Center for the of the Advancement for atrix Center interdisciplinary approach to critical whiteness studies and critical race he M he theory, this paper begins with positing how the emotions of white T resistance are rooted in the shame of revealing a repressed childhood and racial abuse. The concern is twofold. First, what happens to the child, now grown, when confronted with moments that reveal this repressed traumatic past? Second, how do these emotional outbursts, regardless of whether they are intentional or malicious, continue to silence, racially microaggress, and ultimately hurt people of color? Methodologically, this paper employs counterstorytelling to illustrate how these emotional behaviors force an interconnected process of pain—one that gets Privilege Conference Privilege erroneously projected onto people of color rather than therapeutically onto the self. When whites refuse to project their racial shame onto White people of color they emotionally invest in a therapy out of whiteness. he he Assistant Professor ournal of T Urban Community Teacher Education and Educational Foundations Understanding & Dismantling Privilege School of Education and Human Development The Official J The Official Understanding and Dismantling Privilege Matias: “And Our Feelings…” “It’s not about race anymore!” she composure of the class.
    [Show full text]
  • Black Country Music(S) and The
    Jost Hendrik Cornelius Burfeind Wilhelmplatz 6 24116 Kiel E-Mail: [email protected] Telefon: 01520–2667189 Matrikelnummer: 1014350 “THAT BLACK SPECK SOUND JUST LIKE A REDNECK”: BLACK COUNTRY MUSIC(S) AND THE (RE-)MAKING OF RACE AND GENRE MASTERARBEIT im Fach „English and American Literatures, Cultures, and Media” mit dem Abschlussziel Master of Arts der Philosophischen Fakultät der Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel vorgelegt von Hendrik Burfeind Erstgutachter: Prof. Dr. Christian Huck Zweitgutachter: Dr. Dennis Büscher-Ulbrich Kiel im April 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction 1 2. Theoretical Framework 2.1 Race, Racialization, and Ideology 8 2.2 Genre and Crossover 10 2.3 Articulation and Genre 15 2.4 On Hijacks, Covers, and Versions 16 3. “Just Out of Reach”: Locating the Soul/Country Binary 3.1 The South and the Geography of Genre(s) 19 3.2 Richard Nixon, “Okie from Muskogee,” and the Politics of Country Music 22 3.3 The ‘Segregation of Sound’ and the ‘Common Stock’ 25 3.4 Charting Success; Or, the Segregation of Sound, Continued 28 4. Analysis, Pt. 1: Rhythm and Country 4.1 “I’ve Always Been Country”: The Making of an Alternative Tradition 31 4.2 Country Music and the Birth of Soul 35 4.3 The Impossibility of Black Country 37 4.4 Modern Sounds and the Same Old Song 39 4.5 Interlude: Race and Genre in the Early 1960s 44 4.6 Country-Soul Flourishes 46 5. Analysis, Pt. 2: Country-Soul 5.1 “Country Music Now Interracial” 48 5.2 Crossover at the Outskirts of Town 50 5.3 Introducing Soul Country 53 5.4 “The Chokin’ Kind” Explores New Territory 57 5.5 “Blacks Sing Country Music” 60 5.6 “Wherever You Go, It’s Simon Country” 64 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Being an Active Bystander Additional Resources for Educating Yourself and Others
    BEING AN ACTIVE BYSTANDER ADDITIONAL RESOURCES FOR EDUCATING YOURSELF AND OTHERS THE KIRWAN INSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF RACE & ETHNICITY | 2017 At the Kirwan Institute, we know that education is vital to challenging racism and all forms of oppression. Addressing everyday bias is a form of educating, as it can open up conversation regarding topics that are often considered taboo or uncomfortable. We invite everyone to educate themselves continually on issues of race, racism, and how to effectively work toward racial equity. To that end, the Kirwan Institute has compiled this list of educational resources that individuals and communities can use to educate themselves and those around them. These educational resources largely focus on the ways in which bias emerges in everyday situations and conversations and how we can speak out in response to bias. These resources are drawn mainly from popular sources and include videos, articles, blogs, and more in order to increase accessibility that may not be present in traditional academic sources. They address a myriad of topics and touch on many different aspects of social identity and marginalization. While this resource list is far from comprehensive, it can be used as a starting point as we strive to not only work against racism but also work toward racial justice and equity. General Resources “Guidelines for Inclusive Language” o https://www.education.tas.gov.au/documentcentre/Documents/Guidelines-for- Inclusive-Language.pdf “Stop Being So Attached!: A Beginner’s Guide on Problematic Language”
    [Show full text]