DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix D Methodology of Standardised Acceptance Rates

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix D Methodology of Standardised Acceptance Rates Appendix D: Methodology of Standardised Acceptance Rates Calculation and Administrative Area Geography in the UK and the Analysis of Data by PCT Group for England Chapter 3, on the incidence of new patients, includes Administrative area geography an analysis of standardised acceptance rates in in England and Wales England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland for areas covered by the Registry. The methodology is There are currently 46 unitary authorities in England, described below. This methodology is also used in 34 shire counties and six metropolitan counties. Chapter 4 and in this Appendix for analyses of Greater London forms a unique area type. Shire prevalent patients. counties and metropolitan counties are subdivided into districts; unitary authorities are not subdivided. Only some of the boundaries of Primary Care Greater London is subdivided into the London Trusts (PCTs) and Local Authorities (LAs) in Boroughs and the City of London. England are similar. The Office for National Statistics is in the process of re-aligning the PCT boundaries with those of local authorities and hopes Unitary Authorities to complete this process by 2007. The data in this Table D.1: Unitary Authorities Report uses the PCT & LA boundaries from the 2001 census as the ONS have not issued new popula- Code UA name tion tables for any of the changed boundaries. 00EB Hartlepool 00EC Middlesbrough 00EE Redcar and Cleveland Patients 00EF Stockton-on-Tees 00EH Darlington For acceptance rate analyses, all new cases recorded 00ET Halton by the Registry as accepted on to RRT in each year 00EU Warrington were included. Each patient’s postcode was matched 00EX Blackburn with Darwen to a 2001 Census output area. The analyses use the 00EY Blackpool patient postcode rather than the GP postcode. 00FA Kingston upon Hull, City of 00FB East Riding of Yorkshire 00FC North East Lincolnshire Geography: Unitary 00FD North Lincolnshire Authorities, Counties and other 00FF York areas 00FK Derby 00FN Leicester In contrast to 2002, contiguous ‘county’ areas were 00FP Rutland not derived by merging Unitary Authorities (UAs) 00FY Nottingham with a bordering county. For example, Southampton 00GA Herefordshire, County of UA and Portsmouth UA were kept separate from 00GF Telford and Wrekin Hampshire county. The final areas used were 00GL Stoke-on-Trent Metropolitan counties, Greater London districts, 00HA Bath and North East Somerset Welsh areas, Shire counties, Unitary Authorities, 00HB Bristol, City of Scottish Council areas and Northern Ireland District 00HC North Somerset Council areas – these different types of area are 00HD South Gloucestershire collectively called ‘Local Authority (LA) areas’ here. 00HG Plymouth 00HH Torbay Lists of areas as at 31/12/2000 were taken from 00HN Bournemouth http://www.statistics.gov.uk/geography/geographic 00HP Poole _area_listings/administrative.asp 00HX Swindon 1 The UK Renal Registry The Ninth Annual Report Table D.1: (continued) Table D.2: (continued) Code UA name Code County name 00JA Peterborough 40 Somerset 00KA Luton 41 Staffordshire 00KF Southend-on-Sea 42 Suffolk 00KG Thurrock 43 Surrey 00LC Medway 44 Warwickshire 00MA Bracknell Forest 45 West Sussex 00MB West Berkshire 46 Wiltshire 00MC Reading 47 Worcestershire 00MD Slough 00ME Windsor and Maidenhead Metropolitan counties 00MF Wokingham 00MG Milton Keynes There are six metropolitan counties, all in England 00ML Brighton and Hove and representing heavily built-up areas (other than 00MR Portsmouth Greater London). These are subdivided into metro- 00MS Southampton politan districts. 00MW Isle of Wight Table D.3: Metropolitan counties Code Area name Metropolitan district Shire counties 00BL Greater Manchester Bolton There are 34 shire counties, subdivided into non- 00BM Bury metropolitan districts. 00BN Manchester 00BP Oldham Table D.2: Shire counties 00BQ Rochdale Code County name 00BR Salford 00BS Stockport 09 Bedfordshire 00BT Tameside 11 Buckinghamshire 00BU Trafford 12 Cambridgeshire 00BW Wigan 13 Cheshire 00BX Cheshire & Knowsley 15 Cornwall and Isles of Scilly Merseyside 16 Cumbria 00BY Liverpool 17 Derbyshire 00CA Sefton 18 Devon 00BZ St. Helens 19 Dorset 00CB Wirral 20 Durham 00CC South Yorkshire Barnsley 21 East Sussex 00CE Doncaster 22 Essex 00CF Rotherham 23 Gloucestershire 00CG Sheffield 24 Hampshire 00CH Northumberland, Gateshead 26 Hertfordshire Tyne and Wear 29 Kent 00CJ Newcastle upon Tyne 30 Lancashire 00CK North Tyneside 31 Leicestershire 00CL South Tyneside 32 Lincolnshire 00CM Sunderland 33 Norfolk 00CN West Midlands Birmingham 34 Northamptonshire 00CQ Coventry 35 Northumberland 00CR Dudley 36 North Yorkshire 00CS Sandwell 37 Nottinghamshire 00CT Solihull 38 Oxfordshire 00CU Walsall 39 Shropshire 00CW Wolverhampton 2 Appendix D Methodology of Administrative Area Geography and Data by PCT Group Table D.3: (continued) Welsh Unitary Authorities Code Area name Metropolitan district Table D.5: Welsh Unitary Authorities 00CX West Yorkshire Bradford Code Area name LA name 00CY Calderdale 00PT Bro Taf Cardiff 00CZ Kirklees 00PH Merthyr Tydfil 00DA Leeds 00PF Rhondda; Cynon; Taff 00DB Wakefield 00PD The Vale of Glamorgan 00NQ Dyfed Powys Ceredigion Greater London 00NU Carmarthenshire 00NS Pembrokeshire This is an administrative unit covering the London 00NN Powys metropolis. There are 32 boroughs and also the City 00PL Gwent Blaenau Gwent of London (a City Corporation). 00PK Caerphilly Table D.4: London boroughs 00PP Monmouthshire 00PR Newport Code Area name Borough name 00PM Torfaen 00AA Greater London City of London 00PB Morgannwg Bridgend 00AB Barking and Dagenham 00NZ Neath, Port Talbot 00AC Barnet 00NX Swansea 00AD Bexley 00NE North Wales Conwy 00AE Brent 00NG Denbighshire 00AF Bromley 00NJ Flintshire 00AG Camden 00NC Gwynedd 00AH Croydon 00NA Isle of Anglesey 00AJ Ealing 00NL Wrexham 00AK Enfield 00AL Greenwich 00AM Hackney Scottish Council Areas 00AN Hammersmith and Fulham Table D.6: Scottish Council Areas 00AP Haringey 00AQ Harrow Code Council name 00AR Havering 00QA Aberdeen City 00AS Hillingdon 00QB Aberdeenshire 00AT Hounslow 00QC Angus 00AU Islington 00QD Argyll & Bute 00AW Kensington and Chelsea 00QE Scottish Borders 00AX Kingston upon Thames 00QF Clackmannanshire 00AY Lambeth 00QG West Dunbartonshire 00AZ Lewisham 00QH Dumfries & Galloway 00BA Merton 00QJ Dundee City 00BB Newham 00QK East Ayrshire 00BC Redbridge 00QL East Dunbartonshire 00BD Richmond upon Thames 00QM East Lothian 00BE Southwark 00QN East Renfrewshire 00BF Sutton 00QP Edinburgh, City of 00BG Tower Hamlets 00QQ Falkirk 00BH Waltham Forest 00QR Fife 00BJ Wandsworth 00QS Glasgow City 00BK Westminster 00QT Highland 3 The UK Renal Registry The Ninth Annual Report Table D.6: (continued) Areas included in Registry Code Council name ‘covered’ population 00QU Inverclyde All parts of Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland 00QW Midlothian are covered by the Registry but coverage is not yet 00QX Moray complete for England. The Registry identified all 00QY North Ayrshire areas in England which they estimated to have 00QZ North Lanarkshire complete coverage and analysis was restricted to 00RA Orkney Islands these areas. 00RB Perth & Kinross 00RC Renfrewshire The right hand column indicates whether the area 00RD Shetland Islands has been included in the analyses. This is dependant 00RE South Ayrshire on whether the renal unit in the area is sending data 00RF South Lanarkshire to the Registry and that there are no overlapping 00RG Stirling areas with renal units not yet connected to the 00RH West Lothian Registry. 00RJ Eilean Siar Northern Ireland District Council Areas Table D.7: Northern Ireland District Council Areas Code Council name 95AA Antrim 95BB Ards 95CC Armagh 95DD Ballymena 95EE Ballymoney 95FF Banbridge 95GG Belfast 95HH Carrickfergus 95II Castlereagh 95JJ Coleraine 95KK Cookstown 95LL Craigavon 95MM Derry 95NN Down 95OO Dungannon 95PP Fermanagh 95QQ Larne 95RR Limavady 95SS Lisburn 95TT Magherafelt 95UU Moyle 95VV Newry and Mourne 95WW Newtownabbey 95XX North Down 95YY Omagh 95ZZ Strabane 4 Appendix D Methodology of Administrative Area Geography and Data by PCT Group Table D.8: Renal Registry coverage of England Covered UK area SHA Name Area type Code in 2005? North East County Durham and Darlington Unitary Authority 00EH X Tees Valley Durham Shire County 20 X Hartlepool Unitary Authority 00EB X Middlesbrough Unitary Authority 00EC X Redcar and Cleveland Unitary Authority 00EE X Stockton-on-Tees Unitary Authority 00EF X Northumberland, Gateshead Metropolitan District 00CH X Tyne & Wear Newcastle upon Tyne Metropolitan District 00CJ X North Tyneside Metropolitan District 00CK X Northumberland Shire County 35 X South Tyneside Metropolitan District 00CL X Sunderland Metropolitan District 00CM X North West Cheshire & Merseyside Cheshire Shire County 13 x Halton Unitary Authority 00ET X Knowsley Metropolitan District 00BX X Liverpool Metropolitan District 00BY X Sefton Metropolitan District 00CA X St. Helens Metropolitan District 00BZ X Warrington Unitary Authority 00EU X Wirral Metropolitan District 00CB X Cumbria and Lancashire Blackburn with Darwen Unitary Authority 00EX X Blackpool Unitary Authority 00EY X Cumbria Shire County 16 X Lancashire Shire County 30 X Greater Manchester Bolton Metropolitan District 00BL X Bury Metropolitan District 00BM X Manchester Metropolitan District 00BN x Oldham Metropolitan District 00BP X Rochdale Metropolitan District 00BQ X Salford Metropolitan District 00BR X Stockport Metropolitan District 00BS x Tameside Metropolitan District 00BT x Trafford Metropolitan
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Draft Topic Paper 5: Natural Environment/Biodiversity
    Wiltshire Local Development Framework Working towards a Core Strategy for Wiltshire Draft topic paper 5: Natural environment/biodiversity Wiltshire Core Strategy Consultation June 2011 Wiltshire Council Information about Wiltshire Council services can be made available on request in other languages including BSL and formats such as large print and audio. Please contact the council on 0300 456 0100, by textphone on 01225 712500 or by email on [email protected]. Wiltshire Core Strategy Natural Environment Topic Paper 1 This paper is one of 18 topic papers, listed below, which form part of the evidence base in support of the emerging Wiltshire Core Strategy. These topic papers have been produced in order to present a coordinated view of some of the main evidence that has been considered in drafting the emerging Core Strategy. It is hoped that this will make it easier to understand how we had reached our conclusions. The papers are all available from the council website: Topic Paper TP1: Climate Change TP2: Housing TP3: Settlement Strategy TP4: Rural Issues (signposting paper) TP5: Natural Environment/Biodiversity TP6: Water Management/Flooding TP7: Retail TP8: Economy TP9: Planning Obligations TP10: Built and Historic Environment TP11:Transport TP12: Infrastructure TP13: Green Infrastructure TP14:Site Selection Process TP15:Military Issues TP16:Building Resilient Communities TP17: Housing Requirement Technical Paper TP18: Gypsy and Travellers 2 Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Green Infrastructure
    Wiltshire Local Development Framework Working towards a Core Strategy for Wiltshire Topic paper 11: Green infrastructure Wiltshire Core Strategy Consultation January 2012 Wiltshire Council Information about Wiltshire Council services can be made available on request in other languages including BSL and formats such as large print and audio. Please contact the council on 0300 456 0100, by textphone on 01225 712500 or by email on [email protected]. This paper is one of 16 topic papers, listed below, which form part of the evidence base in support of the emerging Wiltshire Core Strategy. These topic papers have been produced in order to present a coordinated view of some of the main evidence that has been considered in drafting the emerging Core Strategy. It is hoped that this will make it easier to understand how we have reached our conclusions. The papers are all available from the council website: Topic Paper 1: Climate Change Topic Paper 2: Housing Topic Paper 3: Settlement Strategy Topic Paper 4: Rural Signposting Tool Topic Paper 5: Natural Environment Topic Paper 6: Retail Topic Paper 7: Economy Topic Paper 8: Infrastructure and Planning Obligations Topic Paper 9: Built and Historic Environment Topic Paper 10: Transport Topic Paper 11: Green Infrastructure Topic Paper 12: Site Selection Process Topic Paper 13: Military Issues Topic Paper 14: Building Resilient Communities Topic Paper 15: Housing Requirement Technical Paper Topic Paper 16: Gypsy and Travellers Contents 1. Executive summary 1 2. Introduction 2 2.1 What is green infrastructure (GI)? 2 2.2 The benefits of GI 4 2.3 A GI Strategy for Wiltshire 5 2.4 Collaborative working 6 3.
    [Show full text]
  • The Natural History of Wiltshire
    The Natural History of Wiltshire John Aubrey The Natural History of Wiltshire Table of Contents The Natural History of Wiltshire.............................................................................................................................1 John Aubrey...................................................................................................................................................2 EDITOR'S PREFACE....................................................................................................................................5 PREFACE....................................................................................................................................................12 INTRODUCTORY CHAPTER. CHOROGRAPHIA.................................................................................15 CHOROGRAPHIA: LOCAL INFLUENCES. 11.......................................................................................17 EDITOR'S PREFACE..................................................................................................................................21 PREFACE....................................................................................................................................................28 INTRODUCTORY CHAPTER. CHOROGRAPHIA.................................................................................31 CHOROGRAPHIA: LOCAL INFLUENCES. 11.......................................................................................33 CHAPTER I. AIR........................................................................................................................................36
    [Show full text]
  • Westminster Parliamentary Constituency Parking Or Street Parking Off-Street Parking Households Parking Or Parking Or Parking Potential Potential Potential
    Households Households Proportion of with off-street without off- households with Total Westminster Parliamentary Constituency parking or street parking off-street parking households parking or parking or parking potential potential potential Makerfield 43,151 37,502 5,649 87% Sefton Central 36,870 31,835 5,035 86% Rother Valley 43,277 37,156 6,121 86% St Helens North 45,216 38,745 6,471 86% Alyn and Deeside 36,961 31,455 5,506 85% Don Valley 44,413 37,454 6,959 84% Stoke-on-Trent South 40,222 33,856 6,366 84% Hemsworth 44,346 37,093 7,253 84% Leigh 47,922 40,023 7,899 84% Cheadle 40,075 33,373 6,702 83% Knowsley 49,055 40,840 8,215 83% Ellesmere Port and Neston 41,209 34,289 6,920 83% South Ribble 43,214 35,946 7,268 83% Wyre and Preston North 41,121 34,181 6,940 83% Doncaster North 44,508 36,929 7,579 83% Delyn 31,517 26,116 5,401 83% Vale of Clwyd 32,766 27,083 5,683 83% Islwyn 33,336 27,431 5,905 82% Caerphilly 38,136 31,371 6,765 82% Bridgend 37,089 30,418 6,671 82% Llanelli 37,886 31,008 6,878 82% Wirral South 32,535 26,623 5,912 82% Aberavon 30,961 25,333 5,628 82% Wirral West 31,312 25,549 5,763 82% East Dunbartonshire 35,778 29,131 6,647 81% Elmet and Rothwell 45,553 37,037 8,516 81% Barnsley East 42,702 34,711 7,991 81% Blackpool North and Cleveleys 38,710 31,423 7,287 81% Redcar 40,869 33,166 7,703 81% Gower 36,618 29,704 6,914 81% St Helens South and Whiston 48,009 38,931 9,078 81% Congleton 46,229 37,449 8,780 81% Mid Derbyshire 38,073 30,812 7,261 81% Scunthorpe 39,213 31,683 7,530 81% Penistone and Stocksbridge 40,347 32,557
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix-D Methodology of Standardised Acceptance Rates
    Appendix D: Methodology of standardised acceptance rates calculation and administrative area geography and Registry population groups in England & Wales Chapter 4, on the incidence of new patients, includes Greater London is subdivided into the London an analysis of standardised acceptance rates in Eng- Boroughs and the City of London. land & Wales for areas covered by the Registry. The methodology is described below. This methodology is also used in Chapter 5 for analysis of prevalent Unitary Authorities patients. Table D.1: Unitary Authorities Code UA name Patients 00EB Hartlepool 00EC Middlesbrough All new cases accepted onto RRT in each year 00EE Redcar and Cleveland recorded by the Registry were included. Each 00EF Stockton-on-Tees patient’s postcode was matched to a 2001 Census 00EH Darlington output area. In 2003 there were only 14 patients 00ET Halton with postcodes that had no match; there was no 00EU Warrington obvious clustering by renal unit. 00EX Blackburn with Darwen 00EY Blackpool Geography: Unitary 00FA Kingston upon Hull, City of Authorities, Counties and other 00FB East Riding of Yorkshire 00FC North East Lincolnshire areas 00FD North Lincolnshire 00FF York In contrast to 2002 contiguous ‘county’ areas were 00FK Derby not derived by merging Unitary Authorities (UAs) 00FN Leicester with a bordering county. For example, Southampton 00FP Rutland UA and Portsmouth UA were kept separate from 00FY Nottingham Hampshire county. The final areas used were Metro- 00GA Herefordshire, County of politan counties, Greater London districts, Welsh 00GF Telford and Wrekin areas, Shire counties and Unitary Authorities – these 00GL Stoke-on-Trent different types of area were called ‘Local Authority 00KF Southend-on-Sea (LA) areas’.
    [Show full text]
  • An Open Letter to Wiltshire Council Opposing Its Plans for the Future of Wiltshire
    An Open Letter to Wiltshire Council opposing its plans for the future of Wiltshire Address for reply: CPRE Office Lansdowne House Long Street Devizes Wiltshire SN10 1NJ To Mr Andrew Kerr Chief Executive Wiltshire Council County Hall Trowbridge Wilts BA14 8JN. Wiltshire Council’s draft Core Strategy Dear Mr Kerr We the undersigned organisations have studied Wiltshire Council’s draft Core Strategy and have concluded that it does not represent a coherent plan for the future of West and North Wiltshire to 2026 and beyond. Last year we were led to believe that the abolition of regional allocations for building new homes in the county would allow us to decide how much development we wanted in Wiltshire and where we wanted it. Today we find that the massive housing estates and retail parks have not shrunk back from the green field sites where the developers would like to build them. Twenty thousand new homes and something like a square kilometre of industrial estates are planned for North and West Wilts by 2026 – homes and jobs for another 50,000 people. We question fundamentally whether this model of expansion can bring the economic growth the council expects, while also meeting the needs of existing communities in an area where transport, education and health services are already struggling to meet demand. Clearly, past planning policies have not worked, yet the Council’s Core Strategy is proposing more of the same: • More decline of town centres • More characterless car-based suburbia • More traffic, congestion, noise and pollution in both towns and villages • More damage to the natural environment and loss of agricultural land • More overloaded services Rather than reproduce these outdated policies in the blueprint for the next 15 years, we ask the council to think again and give us: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • North Wiltshire CREMATORIUM
    North Wiltshire CREMATORIUM Plot Fees (10 year Lease is Scatter Only, Plot lease price only quoted.) 10 Years* 20 Years 50 Years 80 Years Granite Bench £1,525 £2,290 £4,955 Wooden Bench £1,525 £2,290 Bird Baths / Sundials £700 £1,050 £2,275 Mini Grave £1,050 £2,275 Desk Tablet £1,050 £2,275 POA Above Ground Vaults £1,050 £2,275 POA Garden Memorials £1,050 £2,275 POA Tree £1,950 £2,925 £6,340 POA Family Garden – Small £1,350 £2,025 £4,390 Family Garden – Medium £1,950 £2,925 £6,340 Family Garden – Large POA POA POA Standard Rose Tree £1,300 £1,975 £4.340 Premium positions available at an extra charge. A variety of dedication memorials & plaques can be purchased at an additional cost to place in any of the above positions. Memorials Prices (Starting from...) Granite Bench £725 Wooden Bench £555 Bird Baths / Sundials £590/£945 Mini Grave £1,125 Desk Tablet £645 Above Ground Vaults £925 Garden Memorials £420 Plaque Options (Up to 30 Letters included) 10 Years 20 Years 50 Years Column Plaque £495 £695 £1,240 Wall Plaque £495 £695 £1,240 Shrub Bed Plaque £495 £695 £1,240 Please contact the office for an appointment with a member of our staff. Whereby we can discuss the various options and prices for individual dedicated memorials shown in our brochure. North Wiltshire Crematorium, Swindon Road, Royal Wootton Bassett, Swindon SN4 8ET t 01793 842090 f 01793 842099 e [email protected] www.northwiltshirecrematorium.co.uk North Wiltshire CREMATORIUM Complementary Memorials (Starting from...) Vases £215 Classic Garden Range £205
    [Show full text]
  • Wiltshire College Lackham Hosted by the Wiltsh Re Archaeological and Natura History Soc Ety
    lElrlsnpul ro1 uo!lelcossy ^EoloaErlcry ]Sy{OCOIS W V'Ifr{Vd A8 ofrro3 oNV OlltdnoC --.rf E 'l ;l fulHsI.tlm ro ACO'tOfVHCUV 1V lursnoNt fHI or 30rnc v co rElTs INTRODUCTION 1 SWINDON 41 KENNET 3 WEST W LTSHIRE 45 NORTH WILTSHIBE 12 BIBLIOGFAPHY 65 SAL SBURY 28 Each gazetteer entry has a etter or letters and a number that re ate to the location maps and the index A Nationa Grid Reference s g ven to a d accurate locaton. S tes are listed in the iour W ltshire Districts and Swlndon Unitary Authority (part of historic Wilshire) by civil parish from the west The abbrev at ons Ll, Lll* and Lll reler to a s te's isted bui ding status, and SAIII indlcates a Sched- rrled Ancient l\lonument. NOTE: The lnclusion oi sites in the gazetteer does not lmply publc access. Wheneveryou are in doubt It is always courteous to ask permlsslon to enter a s te. PUBLISHED BY THE ASSOCIATION FOR INDUSTRIAL ARCHAEOLOGY 2OO8 O The editor, the Assoc ation Ior lnduslrlal Archaeology and Wiltshlre Archaeologica and Natural History Society Photographs: WANHS lA Committee, Witshire Build ngs Record and Peter Stanier Maps are based on the Ordnance Suwey map with the permission of Ordnance Survey, on behall ol Her Majesty's Stationary Otfice O Crown Copyright lt'lo 100026772 2008 ASSOCIATIO FOB II{DUSTRIAL ARCHAEOLOGY This book is published to mark the AIA s 2008 Conlerence at Wiltshire College Lackham hosted by the Wiltsh re Archaeological and Natura History Soc ety. The AIA was estab ished in 1973 to promote the study of industrial archaeology and encourage improved standards of recording, research consetuation and publ cat on.
    [Show full text]
  • Academy Name LA Area Parliamentary Constituency St
    Academy Name LA area Parliamentary Constituency St Joseph's Catholic Primary School Hampshire Aldershot Aldridge School - A Science College Walsall Aldridge-Brownhills Shire Oak Academy Walsall Aldridge-Brownhills Altrincham College of Arts Trafford Altrincham and Sale West Altrincham Grammar School for Boys Trafford Altrincham and Sale West Ashton-on-Mersey School Trafford Altrincham and Sale West Elmridge Primary School Trafford Altrincham and Sale West Loreto Grammar School Trafford Altrincham and Sale West Heanor Gate Science College Derbyshire Amber Valley Kirkby College Nottinghamshire Ashfield Homewood School and Sixth Form Centre Kent Ashford The Norton Knatchbull School Kent Ashford Towers School and Sixth Form Centre Kent Ashford Fairfield High School for Girls Tameside Ashton-under-Lyne Aylesbury High School Buckinghamshire Aylesbury Sir Henry Floyd Grammar School Buckinghamshire Aylesbury Dashwood Primary Academy Oxfordshire Banbury Royston Parkside Primary School Barnsley Barnsley Central All Saints Academy Darfield Barnsley Barnsley East Oakhill Primary School Barnsley Barnsley East Upperwood Academy Barnsley Barnsley East The Billericay School Essex Basildon and Billericay Dove House School Hampshire Basingstoke The Costello School Hampshire Basingstoke Hayesfield Girls School Bath and North East Somerset Bath Oldfield School Bath and North East Somerset Bath Ralph Allen School Bath and North East Somerset Bath Batley Girls' High School - Visual Arts College Kirklees Batley and Spen Batley Grammar School Kirklees Batley
    [Show full text]
  • The Distribution and Status of the Polecat (Mustela Putorius) in Britain 2014-2015
    The Distribution and Status of the Polecat (Mustela putorius) in Britain 2014-2015 Elizabeth Croose 2016 1 Contents 1 Acknowledgements 3.4.2.4 South-east England 16 3.4.2.5 East of England 17 2 Summary 3.4.2.6 Northern England 17 3.4.3 Scotland 18 3 19 1. Introduction 3.5 Defining ‘Polecat Purity Zones’ 3.5.1 Changes in ‘Polecat Purity Zones’ since the 2004-2006 survey 20 1.1 Introduction to the polecat 3 3.6 Carcass collection 21 1.2 History in Britain 3 1.3 Previous distribution surveys 4 4 22 1.4 Survey aims 4. Discussion 22 5 4.1 Distributional change since the 2004-2006 survey 2. Methods 4.2 Reasons for polecat range expansion 23 2.1 Record collection 5 4.3 Prospects and threats to future recovery 24 2.2 Publicity 5 4.3.1 Prospects for future recovery 24 2.3 Record verification 6 4.3.2 Potential threats to future recovery 24 2.4 Carcass collection 6 4.3.2.1 Trapping mortality 24 4.3.2.2 Secondary rodenticide poisoning 25 7 4.3.2.3 Status of the rabbit population 25 3. Results 4.3.2.4 Hybridisation between polecats and ferrets 25 3.1 Record collection 7 4.4 The status of the polecat elsewhere in Europe 27 3.2 Origins of records 7 4.5 Recommendations for future work 27 3.2.1 Road casualties 8 4.5.1 Monitoring polecats 27 3.2.2 Live sightings 9 4.5.2 Investigating threats to polecats 27 3.2.3 Live trapped 9 4.5.3 Raising awareness and promoting understanding 27 3.2.4 Dead (other) 11 4.5.4 Improving confidence in polecat records 28 3.2.5 Camera trap 11 3.3 Seasonal patterns 12 3.4 Distribution of records 13 28 5.
    [Show full text]
  • (Public Pack)Item 3: Revised Appendices Agenda Supplement
    Public Document Pack Agenda Supplement Meeting: County Council Time: 10.00 am Date: 10 March 2016 Venue: Council Chamber, County Hall, Colliton Park, Dorchester, DT1 1XJ Debbie Ward Contact: Lee Gallagher, Democratic Services Manager Chief Executive County Hall, Dorchester, DT1 1XJ 01305 224191 - Date of Publication: [email protected] Wednesday, 2 March 2016 3. Exploring Options for the Future of Local Government in 1 - 6 Bournemouth, Dorset and Poole To receive revised appendices to the report by the Chief Executive. This page is intentionally left blank Agenda Item 3 Appendix 1 Learning from Other Council Mergers Case Study: Wiltshire In December 2007 the government announced that five county areas would become unitary in 2009 – Wiltshire, Cornwall, Shropshire, Northumberland and Durham. The Wiltshire merger is cited as one of the most successful unitary initiatives in the UK, achieved on time and under budget, and gaining a glowing report from DCLG. It is the successor authority to Wiltshire County Council (1889–2009) and four district councils— Kennet, North Wiltshire, Salisbury, and West Wiltshire—all of which had been created in 1973 and were abolished in 2009 when Wiltshire Council was created. Wiltshire has a population of c. 435,000 who are represented by 98 Councillors (majority Conservative). In December 2007, the Government approved a bid from Wiltshire County Council for a unitary council to take over the responsibilities for all local government services in those areas in Wiltshire currently served by four district councils and the county council. A Statutory Instrument was subsequently approved by Parliament on 25 February 2008, establishing a new Wiltshire unitary authority from 1 April 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • The Statistical Bias Against Unitary Counties
    THE STATISTICAL BIAS AGAINST UNITARY COUNTIES How local government reorganisation has hidden deprivation and threatens to strip authorities of funding Steve Fothergill and Tony Gore Centre for Regional Economic and Social Research Sheffield Hallam University Final report October 2011 This report has been funded by Durham County Council. An additional input of Prof Fothergill’s time was provided by the Industrial Communities Alliance, the all-party association of local authorities in Britain’s industrial areas. 1 Contents Summary 1. PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF THE REPORT The nature of the problem The report 2. THE AVAILABILITY OF STATISTICS The authorities affected by reorganisation Review of published data Data availability: some conclusions 3. THE IMPACT ON THE MEASUREMENT OF DISADVANTAGE A working method Indices of Deprivation DWP benefits data The impact: an assessment 4. A SPECIAL CASE? The counter-argument The scale of the new unitary counties Why size matters Special case: an assessment 5. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS An unintended by-product of reorganisation Recommendations 2 Summary The reorganisation of local government in parts of England in 2009 has created a statistical anomaly. Whereas data for 36 former district councils is now being discontinued, figures continue to be produced for 201 districts within the surviving two-tier counties. This threatens to hide deprivation in the new unitary counties and, in turn, to erode the likelihood that some of these unitary counties will benefit from funding streams that target areas of disadvantage. This could develop into a major, on-going problem. It would be astonishing if, in the long run, statistics for local disadvantage did not continue to guide policy and funding even though current area-based initiatives are being run down.
    [Show full text]