Adhesive Contaminants in Secondary Fibre Utilisation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Adhesive Contaminants in Secondary Fibre Utilisation John H. Klungness, Chemical Engineer USDA Forest Service Forest Products Laboratory One Gifford Pinchot Drive Madison, WI 53705-2398 U.S.A. October 1992 Prepared for publication in Proceedings of the Pira Conference Paperboard-the Technology and the Future, Birmingham, West Midlands, UK. 11-12 November 1992 Keywords: Adhesion, adhesives, classification, control systems, hot melts, impurities, lattices, properties, reclaimed fibres, wastepapers. The Forest Products Laboratory is maintained in cooperation with the University of Wisconsin. This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and it is therefore in the public domain and not subject to copyright. ADHESIVE CONTAMINANTS IN SECONDARY FIBRE UTILISATION1 John H. Klungness Chemical Engineer USDA Forest Service Forest Products Laboratory2 One Gifford Pinchot Drive Madison, WI 53705-2398 U.S.A. ABSTRACT A variety of adhesive contaminants (stickies) are encountered in wastepapers. To use wastepaper in paperboard production, stickies must be controlled. The properties and control methods of adhesive contaminants are discussed here. Specifically, control methods include furnish selection, improved pulping and deflaking, welldesigned screening and cleaning systems, and dispersion or additives to detackify or stabilize stickies, or both. The possible application of a new technology for controlling stickies is also discussed. Also, test methods for measuring contaminants in pulps are reviewed. INTRODUCTION To facilitate the use of wastepaper in paperboard production, stickies (sticky contaminants from synthetic adhesives) must be controlled [1]. Large amounts of wastepaper are used in U.S. paperboard manufacture (Table 1), and the amount is projected to increase. The current level of 36 x 106 t of paperboard production per year is projected to reach 40 x 106 t per year in 1995. This is about a 12% increase in production. But this includes an even greater percentage increase in the use of wastepaper from the current 13 x 106 t to 17 x 106 t over the same period, for a 30% increase [2]. Most grades of wastepaper available are used in the production of the various grades of paperboard. 1Portions of this paper are taken directly, by permission, from Progress in Paper Recycling, Vol. No. 1, pp. 54-63, November 1991, and from Materials Interactions Relevant to Recycling Wood- Based Materials, published by Materials Research Society. 2The Forest Products Laboratory is maintained in cooperation with the University of Wisconsin. This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and it is therefore in the public domain and not subject to copyright. 2 CLASSIFICATION AND PROPERTIES OF STICKIES Wastepaper bales usually contain extraneous materials such as sand, glass, staples, nails, inks, coatings, plastic, Styrofoam, wax, ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA), and styrene butadiene rubber (SBR). Particularly troublesome contaminants in wastepaper are stickies which, in their original state, were used as paper adhesives. Inks and coatings can also be a source of stickies. Four primary components of inks are pigment, vehicle, binder, and modifier. Coating formulations contain several ingredients that can be classified as pigments, binders, and additives, such as plasticizers, thickeners, dispersants, dyes, preservatives, and defoamers. Both inks and coatings contain binders that contribute to the stickies problem. Common binders used in inks are hydrocarbon resins and rosin esters; those used in coatings include starch, soya protein, acrylics, and polyvinyl acetate [3,4]. An overview of stickies was presented by Moreland and Scott [5,6]. 3 Stickies can generally be classified into three categories: hot melts, pressure-sensitive adhesives, and lattices. Although wax can be a contaminant, it is not included separately because it is similar to and a main ingredient of most hot melts. Contaminants such as plastics and Styrofoam are also excluded from this discussion because they are not stickies. Hot Melts Hot melts are used in book bindings, case sealings, and moisture barriers. Many boxboards are coated with hot melts to prevent the transport of moisture. They are applied at high temperature and form bonds upon cooling. Three primary components of hot melts are vinyl acetate polymers and copolymers, tackifiers, and waxes. The tackifier improves the wettability of the hot melt, and wax is used as a bulking agent and to adjust the melting point of the hot melt. Tackifiers used in adhesives are summarized in Table 2 [7]. At room temperature, hot melts are solid. They soften at 70°C to 120°C, depending on the amount of waxes and other ingredients. Most hot melts are insoluble in water, acidic, or alkaline solutions but dissolve readily in many organic solvents such as dichloromethane and toluene. The density of hot melts ranges between 900 and 1,000 kg/m3. Pressure-Sensitive Adhesives Pressure-sensitive adhesives (PSA) are primarily used on labels, tapes, and self-sealing envelopes. An important component of PSA is rubber elastomer, such as the widely used SBR or styrene-isoprene-styrene block copolymer. A tackifier improves wettability of the adhesive to the substrate, and inorganic oxides are added as fillers. Like hot melts, most PSA are insoluble in water, mild acids, and alkalies. However, they dissolve readily in many organic solvents. The density of PSA ranges from 900 to 1,100 kg/m3 Lattices Lattices are commonly used in foil lamination, heat-seal, and coating applications. They are also used on labels for varnished surfaces. Like PSA, lattices contain a rubbery component (natural or synthetic rubber latex) and a tackifer. They are in a colloidal suspension, and appropriate additives are used to prevent agglomeration. One peculiar property of lattices is that they become sticky at high temperatures (higher than approximately 90°C). Otherwise, their properties are similar to those of PSA. They are insoluble in aqueous media but dissolve readily in organic solvents. 4 5 PROBLEMS CAUSED BY STICKIES When stickies are present in pulps in unacceptable amounts, they cause problems with both paper machine operation and product quality. They deposit on wires, felts, press rolls, and drying cylinders. They prevent good fibre-to-fibre bonding and increase the risk of web breaks on the paper machine, particularly with newsprint and tissue grades [8,9]. Wax or hot melts can form a thin film on linerboards, giving them a slippery surface. Consequently, when the linerboard is wound, a telescoping roll results. Stickies can greatly influence the quality of a product, Hot melts and wax in the middle layer of a multi-ply boxboard can migrate to the top and bottom surfaces when the board is dried. After the board is wound, adjacent layers adhere to each other. The roll is then shipped to a customer who discovers a hole or defect in the board. Stickies also cause problems in high-speed printing and converting operations. CONTROL OF STICKIES There are five approaches to controlling stickies. These are furnish selection, improved pulping and deflaking operations, screening and cleaning, dispersion, and additives. Some of these approaches were discussed by McKinney [10] and Doshi [11]. Furnish Selection One of the easiest ways to avoid stickies problems is to prevent them from entering the mill. Criteria must be established for acceptable and unacceptable wastepaper [12,13,14]. This information should, in turn, be communicated to wastepaper dealers to maintain the quality of incoming paper. Depending on the nature of the furnish, the final product, and specific problems or customer needs, measuring the concentration of stickies and plastics or clay and the brightness, freeness, groundwood content, or fibre length distribution may be desirable. One or more of these indicators of wastepaper quality may be used, depending on the particular circumstances of the mill. Improved Pulping and Deflaking Once the wastepaper is accepted at the mill, it goes to the pulper where, through proper operating conditions and accessory equipment., it is fibrized without significant disintegration of 6 contaminants. Important parameters of this process include stock consistency, temperature, low and high pulping intensities, and configuration of the pulper. Most modem pulpers are equipped with auxiliary equipment to remove contaminants before they are broken down into small pieces. The auxiliary equipment includes a ragger to remove wire and string, a junker for large contaminants, and a secondary pulper. A stream is bled off the secondary pulper and subjected to mild fibrizing. High-density contaminants accumulate in a chamber with a double-valve arrangement while stock is sent back to the pulper or is screened in a rotary screen. Many older pulpers are being retrofitted with these accessories [15]. Another pulper that is gaining popularity, particularly for newsprint deinking, is the drum pulper [16,17,18]. Because of the absence of a high-speed rotor, the drum pulper does not have any cutting action. As a result, many contaminants, like plastics and book bindings, remain virtually intact and are rejected by the associated rotary screen. Recently, steam explosion pulping has been proposed for defibring wastepapers [19,20]. In this pulper, loose wastepapers are subjected to steam at about 2,800 Wa and 200°C. When the pressure is released, the material explodes and defibres. Contaminants, stickies, and inks are also dispersed in this pulper. Long-term performance of the pulp on the paper machine remains to be evaluated. Screening and Cleaning In the screening and cleaning approach, come screens with holes and fine screens with slots are used to remove contaminants, based primarily on their size [21-30]. Holes are generally 1.55 mm wide or larger, although some screens have a 1.38-mm-wide hole. Fine screens have slots with widths ranging from 0.20 to 0.60 mm. As slot size decreases, contaminant removal increases but so does fibre loss [31,32]. Most pressure screens operate with mass reject ratios of 15% to 30%. To minimize fibre loss, second and third screening stages must be utilised.
Recommended publications
  • Production of Sugars, Ethanol and Tannin from Spruce Bark and Recovered Fibres

    Production of Sugars, Ethanol and Tannin from Spruce Bark and Recovered Fibres

    IENCE SC • VTT SCIENCE • T S E Production of sugars, ethanol and tannin from N C O H I N spruce bark and recovered fibres S O I V Dissertation L • O S G Valorisation of forest industry-related side- and waste streams in a T 76 Y H • R G biorefinery context could help to reduce dependence on fossil I E L S H 76 E G A resources and introduce new value chains and sources of income I R H C for the forest industry. This thesis examined two abundant and H underutilized biomass streams spruce bark and recovered fibres as biorefinery feedstocks for the production of sugars, ethanol and tannin. Hot water extraction of tannins from spruce bark, steam explosion to reduce the recalcitrance of the feedstock towards hydrolytic Production of sugars, ethanol and tannin from spruce... enzymes, enzymatic hydrolysis of bark carbohydrates and fermentation of released sugars to ethanol were demonstrated and the effect of main process parameters studied. Recovered fibres were fractionated from solid recovered fuel, a standardised combustion fuel composed mainly of packaging waste, and the composition and enzymatic digestibility of the material were determined. The effect of pretreatment, solids loading and the use of surfactants on hydrolysis yield was studied. Selected steps for processing spruce bark and recovered fibres were scaled up from laboratory- to small pilot scale.The results of the work carried out in this thesis indicate that the biorefinery concepts presented for spruce bark and recovered fibres have technical potential for industrial application. Production
  • What Happens to Cellulosic Fibers During Papermaking and Recycling? a Review

    What Happens to Cellulosic Fibers During Papermaking and Recycling? a Review

    PEER-REVIEWED REVIEW ARTICLE ncsu.edu/bioresources WHAT HAPPENS TO CELLULOSIC FIBERS DURING PAPERMAKING AND RECYCLING? A REVIEW Martin A. Hubbe,* Richard A. Venditti, and Orlando J. Rojas Both reversible and irreversible changes take place as cellulosic fibers are manufactured into paper products one or more times. This review considers both physical and chemical changes. It is proposed that by understanding these changes one can make better use of cellulosic fibers at various stages of their life cycles, achieving a broad range of paper performance characteristics. Some of the changes that occur as a result of recycling are inherent to the fibers themselves. Other changes may result from the presence of various contaminants associated with the fibers as a result of manufacturing processes and uses. The former category includes an expected loss of swelling ability and decreased wet-flexibility, especially after kraft fibers are dried. The latter category includes effects of inks, de-inking agents, stickies, and additives used during previous cycles of papermaking. Keywords: Paper recycling, Drying, Deinking, Hornification, Inter-fiber bonding, Refining, Fines, Fiber length, Conformability Contact information: Department of Forest Biomaterials Science and Engineering, Box 8005, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-8005, USA; *Corresponding author: [email protected] INTRODUCTION Cellulosic fibers can change significantly when formed into a wet web of paper and subsequently subjected to such processes as pressing, drying, printing, storage, repulping, and deinking. Some of the changes can be subtle. Often it is possible to substitute recovered fibers in place of virgin fibers used for the production of paper or paperboard. On the other hand, characteristic differences between recycled fibers and virgin fibers (fresh from pulping wood, not recycled) can be expected; many of these can be attributed to drying.
  • Stickies Detection Methods Macro and Micro Detailed Report

    Stickies Detection Methods Macro and Micro Detailed Report

    FINAL REPORT January 31, 2003 CONTAINERBOARD GROUP AMERICAN FOREST & PAPER ASSOCIATION Project Title: Evaluation of Various Adhesive Contaminant Analysis Methods for the Use in Old Corrugated Container Recycling Plants Names of Principal Investigators: Richard A. Venditti and Hou-min Chang Institution: North Carolina State University tel. (919) 515-6185 Dept. of Wood and Paper Science fax. (919) 515-6302 Raleigh NC 27695-8005 email: [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS Page: Executive Summary 2 Introduction 3 Literature Review 4 Materials and Methods 5 Stickies Test Methods: Macro Stickies Tests 5 Stickies Test Methods: Micro Stickies Tests 8 Materials for Testing 10 Results and Discussion 12 Macro-stickies Results 12 Micro-stickies Results 17 Evaluations of Stream-lined Tests 21 Estimates of Time and Labor Necessary for the Various 22 Stickies Test Methods. Evaluation of Stickies Removal Across a Water Clarifier 24 Overall Stickies Test Methods Recommendations for 25 Various Applications in an OCC Recycle Mill Conclusions 29 Figures 30 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This project involves critically evaluating different test methods for their ability to detect stickies contaminants in old corrugated container (OCC) recycling plants. Tests were broadly classified as either macro or micro stickies test methods based on standard industrial terms. The macro stickies test methods evaluated were a bleaching and dyeing of handsheets, Port Townsend Method 1 (involves dyeing handsheets with black dye followed by image analysis), Port Townsend Method 2 (involves dyeing lab-screened rejects on filter pads with black dye followed by image analysis), Tappi Method 277 (involves pressing lab- screened rejects against a white coated material that transfers to stickies followed by image analysis), and a deposition method in which stickies are deposited onto a sample of a paper machine wire.
  • Adhesive Contaminants (Stickies) and Methods for Removal

    Adhesive Contaminants (Stickies) and Methods for Removal

    257 ADHESIVE CONTAMINANTS (STICKIES) AND METHODS FOR REMOVAL JOHN H. KLUNGNESS* AND MAHENDHA R. DOSHI** *USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, WI 53705 **D~shi & Associates Inc.. Marathon Engineers/Architects/Planners, Inc. Appleton, WI ABSTRACT A variety of adhesive contaminants (“stickies”) are encountered in wastepapers. They are broadly classified as hot melts, pressure-sensitive adhesives, and lattices. Their properties and control methods are discussed. Specifically, control methods include furnish selection, improved pulping end deflaking. well-designed screening end cleaning systems, and dispersion end additives to detackify or stabilize stickies, or both. A new technology is also discussed regarding it’s possible application for controlling stickie contaminants. Test methods for measuring stickies are also reviewed. INTRODUCTION Large amounts of wastepaper are generated every day in the United States and interest in its reuse has increased steadily due to environmental concerns and improved economics. In 1990, for example, 28.9 million tons of wastepaper were collected for recycling. By 1995, that amount is expected to increase to almost 40 million tons with a collection rate of almost 40% [1]. To facilitate the use of secondary fibers, sticky contaminants, or "stickies,” must be controlled [2]. CLASSIFICATION AND PROPERTIES OF STICKIES Wastepaper bales usually contain extraneous materials such as sand, glass, staples, nails, inks, coatings, plastic, styrofoam, wax, EVA (ethylene vinyl acetate), SBR (styrene butadiene rubber), etc. A particularly troublesome contaminant in wastepaper is “stickies” which, in their original state, were used as paper adhesives. Inks end coatings can also be a source of stickies. Four primary components of inks include pigment, vehicle, binder, and modifier.
  • Enzymatic Stickies Control in MOW, OCC, and ONP Furnishes

    Enzymatic Stickies Control in MOW, OCC, and ONP Furnishes

    James W. Fitzhenry Philip M. Hoekstra Dan Glover Senior Development Specialist Development Group Manager Project Manager Buckman Laboratories Buckman Laboratories Buckman Laboratories 1256 N. Mclean Blvd. 1256 N. Mclean Blvd 1256 N. Mclean Blvd Memphis, TN 38108 Memphis, TN 38108 Memphis, TN 38108 . Abstract Stickies remain as one of the major obstacles in the manufacture of quality paper using recycled fiber sources such as OCC, MOW, and ONP. A combination of proper water clarification, effective screening and cleaning practices, and low impact repulping will allow for the mechanical removal of a majority of stickies. However, stickie contaminants often remain in the process even after peak mechanical efficiencies for stickies removal are attained. The chemical control of stickies is the next tool for a papermaker's use. Some new effective tools in this arena are enzymes. Enzymes are gaining wider acceptance in the pulp and paper industry for a variety of applications such as pulp mill and paper machine boilouts, deposit control by dispersion of accumulated slime, pitch control, drainage assistance as well as other uses. A recent area of research involves using enzymes for the control of stickies. This paper describes laboratory work done in the search for an enzyme that will act on stickies. Evidence of action on stickies could be shown if the enzyme reduced either the size or the number of stickies. Laboratory data has provided this evidence. We will discuss work done on a number of different furnishes, and the effect of enzymes in reduction of stickies. Introduction Secondary fiber contaminants are a major issue in most recycled mills throughout the U.S., as the amount of recycled fibers such as mixed office waste (MOW), old corrugated containers (OCC), and old newsprint (ONP) used per ton of paper produced increases across the country (1).
  • Size Distribution Analysis of Microstickies Treated by Enzyme Mixtures in Papermaking Whitewater YANAN TANG, BO LI, SHENGFANG GENG, CARL HOUTMAN, and SHUBIN WU

    Size Distribution Analysis of Microstickies Treated by Enzyme Mixtures in Papermaking Whitewater YANAN TANG, BO LI, SHENGFANG GENG, CARL HOUTMAN, and SHUBIN WU

    PEER-REVIEWED RECYCLING Size distribution analysis of microstickies treated by enzyme mixtures in papermaking whitewater YANAN TANG, BO LI, SHENGFANG GENG, CARL HOUTMAN, AND SHUBIN WU ABSTRACT: Microstickies present a formidable challenge for papermakers. Many strategies have been explored to control them. Enzyme treatment is a promising technology, but the mechanism of its action has not been deter- mined, thus inhibiting further application of this new technology. This study investigated characteristics and size dis- tributions of microstickies treated by esterase-cellulase mixtures. Determination of particle size and number was accomplished using a modified flow cytometer, which combined streaming capillary flow, laser-based particle size analysis and fluorescent dye tracing. The results showed that treatment of samples with enzyme mixtures induced size reduction of the larger microstickies. This effect was most dramatic for 1:1 ratios of esterase to cellulase. The treated particles were more stable than untreated ones. The smaller microstickies treated with some ratios of ester- ase and cellulase tended to aggregate over time. The behaviors of microstickies treated by enzyme mixtures were only slightly affected by temperature and shearing action. The surface physicochemical characteristics of these par- ticles indicated that changes of these basic properties affected the whole whitewater system and resulted in a new equilibrium among all the particles. Application: This work provides a new method for controlling microstickies and could serve as a valuable refer- ence for the future application of enzymes in papermaking. he annual global production and consumption of and flotation [20,21]. Removal of the smaller stickies (70%– Tpaper and paperboard have recently reached almost 90% of stickies) is challenging [8].
  • Paper Recycling Technology Detailed Part 3

    Paper Recycling Technology Detailed Part 3

    Lecture Refining of Recovered Fibers Several Slides Courtesy of Dr. Med Byrd. What is Refining? Refining is a physical treatment performed on pulp fibers to improve their papermaking characteristics It is essential to the production of strong, smooth, useful paper Several Slides Courtesy of Dr. Med Byrd. Why do we need refining? Increasing bonding area by: Collapsing hollow cell walls into flat ribbons Fraying the fiber surface – “fibrillation” Making the fibers more flexible and conformable, delaminating the wall Cutting some of the longer fibers into smaller lengths to help formation Courtesy of M. Hubbe Refining The effects of refining on freeness, density, tear index, and tensile index in virgin bleached kraft pulps Secondary Fibers, Tappi Fiber Structure Thin primary wall (P), which is delicate and easily removed Secondary wall has three layers S1 – thin and not easily wetted S2 – 70-85% of total mass; easily wetted and swollen S3 - thin, waxy, warty Secondary Fibers, Tappi Fiber Structure Refining damages and removes the Primary and S1 wall layers, exposing the S2 layer Once the S2 layer is exposed and swollen, mechanical action causes the layer to delaminate and collapse Mechanical action also fibrillates the surface, cuts some fibers, and makes them less stiff and more Photomicrograph showing a refined fiber conformable with fibrillation on the surface Refining: Subprocesses The Refining Action The mechanical action required for proper refining is not a simple brushing, cutting, grinding or pounding Rather,
  • Chemical Characterization and Enzymatic Control of Stickies in Kraft Paper Production

    Chemical Characterization and Enzymatic Control of Stickies in Kraft Paper Production

    polymers Article Chemical Characterization and Enzymatic Control of Stickies in Kraft Paper Production Lourdes Ballinas-Casarrubias 1, Guillermo González-Sánchez 2, Salvador Eguiarte-Franco 1, Tania Siqueiros-Cendón 1 , Sergio Flores-Gallardo 2 , Eduardo Duarte Villa 3, Miguel de Dios Hernandez 3, Beatriz Rocha-Gutiérrez 1 and Quintín Rascón-Cruz 1,* 1 Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, Circuito Universitario s/n, Campus Universitario No. 2, Chihuahua C.P. 31125, Mexico; [email protected] (L.B.-C.); [email protected] (S.E.-F.); [email protected] (T.S.-C.); [email protected] (B.R.-G.) 2 Centro de Investigación en Materiales Avanzados, S.C. Laboratorio Nacional de Nanotecnología, Miguel de Cervantes No. 120, Chihuahua C.P. 31109, Mexico; [email protected] (G.G.-S.); sergio.fl[email protected] (S.F.-G.) 3 Grupo COPAMEX, Ave. de la Juventud no. 280, San Nicolás de los Garza C.P. 66450, Mexico; [email protected] (E.D.V.); [email protected] (M.d.D.H.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 30 October 2019; Accepted: 12 December 2019; Published: 20 January 2020 Abstract: Paper recycling has increased in recent years. A principal consequence of this process is the problem of addressing some polymeric components known as stickies. A deep characterization of stickies sampled over one year in a recycled paper industry in México was performed. Based on their chemical structure, an enzymatic assay was performed using lipases. Compounds found in stickies by Fourier-transform infrared spectrometry were poly (butyl-acrylate), dioctyl phthalate, poly (vinyl-acetate), and poly (vinyl-acrylate).
  • Tackiness Reducing of the Stickies Surfaces by Inorganic Agents and Organic Polymers

    Tackiness Reducing of the Stickies Surfaces by Inorganic Agents and Organic Polymers

    WOOD RESEARCH 63 (6): 2018 1013-1020 TACKINESS REDUCING OF THE STICKIES SURFACES BY INORGANIC AGENTS AND ORGANIC POLYMERS Vladimir Kuna, Jozef Balbercak, Andrej Pazitny, Albert Russ, Stefan Bohacek Pulp and Paper Research Institute Bratislava, Slovak Republic Vladimir Ihnat Slovak Forest Products Research Institute Bratislava, Slovak Republic (Received April 2018) ABSTRACT This paper present the results of application of inorganic minerals and organic polymers for elimination of sticky impurities "macrostickies" in the processing of recovered paper. The impact of individual agents has been monitored on different species of suspensions. On the dark suspension of recycled fibres VL5 with a brightness 53% ISO and an ash content of 17.6%, and the suspension VL1 with a brightness 64% ISO and an ash content of 29.4%. From inorganic minerals, the highest efficiency was achieved in the elimination of macrostickies using bentonite Hydrocol OT. At a dose of 5 kg bentonite.t-1 b.d. recycled fibres efficiency of 65.1% for suspension VL5 and 58.7% for VL1 was achieved. The highest performance of the Acefloc 2550 was achieved from the polymers. When applied to the VL5 suspension, the macrostickies were reduced by 57.1%, and when applied to the VL1 suspension, the macrostickies content dropped by 56.5%. KEYWORDS: Macrostickies, organic polymers, inorganic fillers, average particle size, montmorillonite. INTRODUCTION Increasing the recycling of paper also increases the content of impurities and undesirable substances in the recovered paper (Kuňa et al. 2016), thereby deteriorating its quality. There are various sources and types of impurities in the recovered paper (Holik 2000). These are various microbiological impurities, insoluble impurities such as adhesives, resins, fillers, wet strength agents, and soluble colloidal materials such as coatings, latexes, which combine a variety of sticky impurities called micro and macrostickies.
  • Enzymatic Removal of Stickie Contaminants

    Enzymatic Removal of Stickie Contaminants

    ENZYMATIC REMOVAL OF STICKIE binders, and high lignin-containing fibers are some sources CONTAMINANTS of stickies that appear during reprocessing wastepapers. Postal stamps, address labels, post-it notes, and self-seal Marguerite S. Sykes John H. Klungness envelopes are among the most common sources of PSAs in Forest Products Technologist Chemical Engineer office papers. The use of PSAs is increasing rapidly; corre- Freya Tan Said Abubakr spondingly, the stickie problem is escalating. Chemical Engineer Supervisory Chemical Engineer USDA Forest Service USDA Forest Service 1 Stickies precipitate on process equipment, redeposit on pulp Forest Products Laboratory Forest Products Laboratory fibers, or pass into process water, only to agglomerate unex- Madison, WI 53705-2398 Madison, WI 53705-2398 pectedly and deposit when least desired or expected. In all cases, stickies contaminate pulp, cause mill shut-downs as a result of fouling of machinery, and cause breaks in the paper ABSTRACT during papermaking or printing. Control of stickies is a costly mill problem (4) that is growing to epidemic propor- tions. Problems associated with stickies are limiting the use Stickie contaminants are a costly problem for both recyclers of recycled fiber now that there is little competitive of market pulp and the papermakers using it. Increased use of economic edge over using virgin fiber. pressure sensitive adhesives (PSAs) has compounded this problem in recycled furnishes. Preliminary laboratory ex- Contaminants, including stickies, are removed most effec- periments using commercially available enzyme preparations tively when they are large enough to be screened out of pulp at the ambient pH of the paper furnish (neutral pH range) slurries, have a density suitable for removal in cleaners, or have resulted in a significant reduction of all residual con- are hydrophobic enough and of the appropriate size to be taminants, including stickies.
  • Us 2019 / 0177913 A1

    Us 2019 / 0177913 A1

    US 20190177913A1 ( 19) United States (12 ) Patent Application Publication ( 10) Pub . No. : US 2019 /0177913 A1 Basilio et al. ( 43 ) Pub . Date : Jun . 13 , 2019 ( 54 ) REMOVAL OF STICKIES IN THE 2) U . S . CI. RECYCLING OF PAPER AND PAPERBOARD CPC . .. .. .. .. D21C 5 /022 ( 2013 .01 ) ; D214 1 /00 ( 2013. 01 ); D21H 11/ 14 ( 2013 .01 ) (71 ) Applicant: Thiele Kaolin Company, Sandersville , GA (US ) (72 ) Inventors : Cesar I . Basilio , Milledgeville , GA (57 ) ABSTRACT (US ) ; Steven W . Sheppard , Sandersville , GA (US ) Removal of stickies from waste paper and paperboard is obtained with the use of a modified kaolin -based stickies (21 ) Appl. No. : 15 /834 , 497 removal composition . The modified kaolin - based stickies ( 22) Filed : Dec . 7 , 2017 removal composition is produced by modifying the kaolin clay, separating the modified kaolin clay from the non Publication Classification reactive kaolin clay, and then adding a nonionic surfactant to (51 ) Int. Ci. the modified kaolin -based particles . Removal of stickies is D21C 5 / 02 ( 2006 .01 ) improved by the use of this modified kaolin -based stickies D21H 11/ 14 (2006 . 01) removal composition during the recycling of the waste paper D21 ) 1 / 00 ( 2006 . 01 ) and paperboard . US 2019 /0177913 A1 Jun . 13 , 2019 REMOVAL OF STICKIES IN THE ies control in which stickies are removed from the product RECYCLING OF PAPER AND PAPERBOARD would be a superior solution than those presented in the prior art, because such a method would not involve the use of TECHNICAL FIELD additional chemicals, polymers, dispersants or other addi [ 0001] The present invention relates to the removal of tives , at an additional production cost , and would provide a stickies from waste paper and paperboard .
  • TAPPI Standards: Regulations and Style Guidelines

    TAPPI Standards: Regulations and Style Guidelines

    TAPPI Standards: Regulations and Style Guidelines REVISED January 2018 1 Preface This manual contains the TAPPI regulations and style guidelines for TAPPI Standards. The regulations and guidelines are developed and approved by the Quality and Standards Management Committee with the advice and consent of the TAPPI Board of Directors. NOTE: Throughout this manual, “Standards” used alone as a noun refers to ALL categories of Standards. For specific types, the word “Standard” is used as an adjective, e.g., “Standard Test Method,” “Standard Specification,” “Standard Glossary,” or “Standard Guideline.” If you are a Working Group Chairman preparing a Standard or reviewing an existing Standard, you will find the following important information in this manual: • How to write a Standard Test Method using proper terminology and format (Section 7) • How to write TAPPI Standard Specifications, Glossaries, and Guidelines using proper terminology and format (Section 8) • What requirements exist for precision statements in Official and Provisional Test Methods (Sections 4.1.1.1, 4.1.1.2, 6.4.5, 7.4.17). • Use of a checklist to make sure that all required sections have been included in a Standard draft (Appendix 4). • How Working Group Chairman, Working Groups, and Standard-Specific Interest Groups fit into the process of preparing a Standard (Section 6.3, 6.4.1, 6.4.2, 6.4.3, 6.4.4, 6.4.6, 6.4.7). • How the balloting process works (Sections 6.4.6, 6.4.7, 6.4.8, 6.4.9) • How to resolve comments and negative votes (Sections 9.5, 9.6, 9.7) NOTE: This document covers only the regulations for TAPPI Standards, which may include Test Methods or other types of Standards as defined in these regulations.