Before a Special Tribunal Under the Resource Management Act 1991 In

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Before a Special Tribunal Under the Resource Management Act 1991 In Before a Special Tribunal Under the Resource Management Act 1991 In the matter of an application for a Water Conservation Order for the Ngaruroro River and Clive River Statement of Evidence of Martin John Unwin on behalf of New Zealand Fish and Game Council, Hawke's Bay Fish and Game Council, Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society of New Zealand, Jet Boating New Zealand, Whitewater NZ Incorporated and Ngāti Hori ki Kohupatiki 15 October 2017 Introduction 1 My name is Martin John Unwin. 2 I have been engaged by Fish & Game New Zealand (FGNZ) to assist with their application for a WCO on the Ngaruroro River by characterising the angling values of the Ngaruroro River in a national and regional context. Qualifications and experience 3 I hold the qualification of Master of Science in Physics (with Distinction) from the University of Canterbury. From 2001-2006 I was a member of the Editorial Advisory Board of the New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, published by the Royal Society of New Zealand. 4 I have been employed by the National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research and its predecessor organisations for 41 years. I retired from full-time work in August 2013, and now work part-time from my home in Wanaka. My main research interest was the biology of Chinook salmon in New Zealand waters, a topic on which I have published over thirty papers in thirteen peer-reviewed international scientific journals. 5 A strong secondary interest throughout my career was collecting and analysing data on usage of New Zealand's fishery resources by recreational anglers. I helped design and analyse numerous surveys of recreational fisheries in both marine and freshwater environments, and have authored or co-authored over forty reports on the results. I have presented evidence on how the survey findings characterise the angling values of New Zealand river fisheries to the Environment Court, Special Commissions, and Regional Council hearings considering Water Conservation Order (WCO) applications and regional planning matters on numerous rivers and catchments, including the Mataura, Rangitata, Buller, Hurunui, Waiau, Kawarau, Nevis, and Oreti. 6 While this is not a hearing before the Environment Court, I confirm that I have read the code of conduct for expert witnesses contained in the Environment Court Consolidated Practice Note (2014). I have complied with it when preparing my written statement of evidence and I agree to comply with it when presenting evidence. I confirm that the evidence and the opinions I have expressed in my evidence are within my area of expertise. I have not omitted to consider material facts known to me that might alter or detract from the opinions that I express. Summary of evidence 7 In a report published in 2013 I identified the Ngaruroro River and its headwaters as a nationally important fishery. For North Island anglers seeking a remote 12000434 | 3048593 page 1 fishing experience in an expansive wilderness environment, the Ngaruroro headwaters provide virtually the only such fishery outside the South Island. 8 Two national angling surveys I have conducted on behalf of FGNZ since my 2013 report was published strongly reinforce this conclusion. The first survey, published in 2013, asked respondents to rate their enjoyment of rivers they were familiar with on a 1-5 scale, and to identify their most important attributes. The second survey, published in 2016, estimated total usage of all significant New Zealand lake and river fisheries over the 2014/15 angling season. 9 The 2013 survey yields three quantitative measures which allow each river’s value to be assessed relative to others. These are its mean enjoyment score, which is closely related to the intuitive notion of importance; its location on the Recreational Opportunity Spectrum (ROS), which spans environments ranging from urban and urban fringe to pristine wilderness; and “angling productivity”, which characterises rivers with extensive areas of fishable water and where anglers have a high expectation of catching a fish. 10 The upper Ngaruroro River (defined as the section above the Taruarau confluence) was the 25th most highly valued of 431 New Zealand river fisheries analysed in detail. It ranks ahead of the upper Mataura River and Tongariro River, both of which have an international reputation. Its peers include rivers such as the Manganui-o-te-ao, Nevis, Maruia, and Ahuriri. With the exception of the Tongariro River, all of these rivers are protected by WCOs for their fishery values. 11 The upper Ngarururo fishery scores highly for both ROS character and angling productivity, both of which contribute to its high importance score. However, I believe this score is significantly enhanced by its rarity value in a North Island context, which greatly increases its importance to North Island anglers. 12 The Taruarau River was the 9th most highly valued of the 431 river fisheries analysed, with the 14th highest ROS score, and the 17th highest angling productivity score. For these reasons alone, it could well serve as the prototype for a high value headwater/wilderness fishery. 13 The results of the 2014/15 national angling survey, together with those of three predecessors conducted since 1994/95, suggest that annual usage of the whole Ngaruroro River has remained relatively stable over this period but that the upper reaches have gained in popularity relative to the lower reaches. The Ngaruroro River consistently ranks among the 50 most heavily fished rivers in New Zealand, with a mean annual usage of 4,230 angler-days. The upper reaches accounted for 58% of annual effort (2,470 angler-days) in 2014/15, compared to 16% (980 angler-days) in 2001/02, and 20-25% (550 angler-days) in 2007/08. 12000434 | 3048593 page 2 14 Anglers from outside the Hawke's Bay region accounted for 38% and 46% of estimated effort on the upper Ngaruroro River and Taruarau River, respectively, during the 2014/15 angling season. This is consistent with results for other FGNZ regions, where the 2014/15 data strongly suggest a general trend towards increasing angler patronage of backcountry and headwater river fisheries throughout New Zealand. Scope of evidence 15 My evidence is based on data from six national angling surveys conducted by FGNZ and its predecessor organisations (the Acclimatisation Societies) over the 35 years from 1980 to 2015. These fall into two groups, with differing objectives. Two surveys, conducted in 1979/1981 and 2013, characterised individual river fisheries in terms of qualitative attributes such as proximity to home, accessibility, scenic beauty, and wilderness character (Teirney et al. 1982, Richardson et al. 1984, Teirney & Richardson 1992, Unwin 2013b). The remaining four surveys, conducted in 1994/95, 2001/02, 2007/08, and 2014/15, estimated annual usage of all New Zealand lakes and rivers by anglers fishing for acclimatised species including brown trout, rainbow trout, and salmon (Unwin & Brown 1998, Unwin & Image 2003, Unwin 2009a, 2016). 16 My conclusions regarding the angling values of the Ngaruroro River are similar to those I presented in an earlier report on its fishery, based on the angler survey information available at the time and prepared as a background paper to accompany FGNZ’s component of an application for a WCO (Unwin 2013a). However, this report was published before results from the 2013 and 2014/15 surveys were available, so is now incomplete in two respects. First, the 2013 river attributes survey (Unwin 2013b) provides a much more robust characterisation of the fishery than was possible in the 2013 report, which was based solely on 30- year-old data from the 1979/81 survey. Second, the 2014/15 survey (Unwin 2016) provides more up to date information on angler usage than was available in 2013. 17 I begin my evidence by summarising the main conclusions from my 2013 report. I follow this with a review of the findings from the 2013 and 2014/15 surveys, focussing on results where the new data significantly extend or modify the conclusions in my 2013 report. Throughout my evidence I keep methodological and analytical detail to a minimum, so as to emphasise the results rather than technicalities. Full details of both surveys, and their predecessors, are available in the technical literature (Unwin 2013b, 2013a and references therein, 2016). 12000434 | 3048593 page 3 Evidence Angler Usage of the Ngaruroro River (from Unwin 2013a) 18 The Ngaruroro River is unusual among North Island rivers in draining a catchment which is highly elevated, receives abundant rainfall, and with land cover dominated by tussock and grassland rather than indigenous or exotic forest. Such catchments are relatively common in the South Island, where they are represented by rivers such as the Wairau, Clarence, Ahuriri, and Nevis, but in the North Island are limited to the upper Ngaruroro and part of the upper Rangitikei. 19 The Ngaruroro River fishery shows considerable longitudinal variation in general character, angler origin, and level of usage. The lower reaches are predominantly fished by anglers from Hawke's Bay, and are valued for proximity to home, ease of access, and large areas of fishable water. By contrast, the upper reaches attract significant numbers of visitors from outside Hawke's Bay, and are characterised by remoteness, high scenic and wilderness value, and large fish. A weakness of the 1979/81 survey was that the “upper reaches” of the Ngaruroro River were not explicitly defined; for the purposes of my 2013 report I interpreted it as referring to the headwaters above Kuripapango. 20 Estimated annual angler usage of the Ngaruroro River was 3,760 angler-days in 1994/95, 6,240 angler-days in 2001/02, and 2,810 angler-days in 2007/08. This is well below usage levels for highly used North Island rivers such as the Tutaekuri, Tukituki, and Rangitikei, but comparable to well-known South Island back country fisheries such as the Buller, Tekapo, and Ahuriri, and ahead of other high profile central North Island rivers such as the Ruakituri, Manganui-o-te-ao, and Whakapapa.
Recommended publications
  • New Zealand 2019.Pdf
    NEW ZEALAND 2019/20 1 NEW ZEALAND At First Class Holidays we love to travel and we treat your holiday with the same passion and attention to detail as if it were our own. For 23 years, our team have been delivering award-winning service to over one hundred thousand satisfied customers. From the moment you pick up the phone, we share your dream; from the moment you book, we share your anticipation and from that moment you arrive, we share your excitement. We take care of it all. With tailor-made holidays to New Zealand and the South Pacific, you can trust us to plan your journey to perfection. Hobbiton 2 CONTENTS 4-5 What Makes Us Different 106 Fox Glacier 6-7 Introduction to New Zealand 105 & 107 Franz Josef 8-9 Ways to Explore 108-113 Queenstown & Fiordland 10 Your Tailor Made Holiday 108-111 Queenstown 11 Our Travel Ambassador 112 Te Anau 112-113 Milford Sound MULTI ISLAND TOURING 112-113 Doubtful Sound 12-45 Escorted Coach Touring 114-115 Southern Lakes & Mount Cook 46-79 Self Drive, Motorhome & Independent Tours 114-115 Mount Cook 115 Lake Tekapo NORTH ISLAND 115 Wanaka Auckland 82-85 116-117 Dunedin & Stewart Island Bay of Islands 86-87 116-117 Stewart Island Paihia 87 117 Invercargill Coromandel & Pacific Coast 88 116-117 Dunedin 88 Whitianga 88 Tauranga NEW ZEALAND CRUISES 89-91 Central North Island 118 Celebrity Cruises 89-90 Rotorua 119 Silversea Cruises 91 Taupo FIJI & THE COOK ISLANDS 91 Tongariro 121-125 Fiji Islands, Resorts 92-93 Napier & Hawke’s Bay & Sightseeing 94-95 Wellington 126 Fiji Cruising 127-129 Cook Islands &
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Tasman Rotoiti Nelson Lakes Report(PDF, 203
    EPA Report: Verified Source: Pestlink Operational Report for Possum, Ship rat Control in the Rotoiti/Nelson Lakes BfoB 08 Nov 2014 - 08 Dec 2014 8/05/2015 Department of Conservation Nelson Lakes Contents 1. Operation Summary ............................................................................................................. 2 2. Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 TREATMENT AREA ....................................................................................................... 4 2.2 MANAGEMENT HISTORY ........................................................................................... 8 3 Outcomes and Targets ......................................................................................................... 8 3.1 CONSERVATION OUTCOMES ................................................................................... 8 3.2 TARGETS ........................................................................................................................ 8 3.2.1 Result Targets .......................................................................................................... 8 3.2.2 Outcome Targets ..................................................................................................... 9 4 Consultation, Consents & Notifications ............................................................................. 9 4.1 CONSULTATION .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Anglers' Notice for Fish and Game Region
    ANGLERS’ NOTICE FOR FISH AND GAME REGION CONSERVATION ACT 1987 FRESHWATER FISHERIES REGULATIONS 1983 Pursuant to section 26R(3) of the Conservation Act 1987, the Minister of Conservation approves the following Anglers’ Notice, subject to the First and Second Schedules of this Notice, for the following Fish and Game Region: Nelson/Marlborough NOTICE This Notice shall come into force on the 1st day of October 2017. 1. APPLICATION OF THIS NOTICE 1.1 This Anglers’ Notice sets out the conditions under which a current licence holder may fish for sports fish in the area to which the notice relates, being conditions relating to— a.) the size and limit bag for any species of sports fish: b.) any open or closed season in any specified waters in the area, and the sports fish in respect of which they are open or closed: c.) any requirements, restrictions, or prohibitions on fishing tackle, methods, or the use of any gear, equipment, or device: d.) the hours of fishing: e.) the handling, treatment, or disposal of any sports fish. 1.2 This Anglers’ Notice applies to sports fish which include species of trout, salmon and also perch and tench (and rudd in Auckland /Waikato Region only). 1.3 Perch and tench (and rudd in Auckland /Waikato Region only) are also classed as coarse fish in this Notice. 1.4 Within coarse fishing waters (as defined in this Notice) special provisions enable the use of coarse fishing methods that would otherwise be prohibited. 1.5 Outside of coarse fishing waters a current licence holder may fish for coarse fish wherever sports fishing is permitted, subject to the general provisions in this Notice that apply for that region.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydroelectricity Or Wild Rivers? Climate Change Versus Natural Heritage
    1 Hydroelectricity or wild rivers? Climate change versus natural heritage May 2012 2 Acknowledgements The Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment would like to express her gratitude to those who assisted with the research and preparation of this report, with special thanks to her staff who worked so tirelessly to bring it to completion. Photography Cover: Mike Walen - Aratiatia Rapids This document may be copied provided that the source is acknowledged. This report and other publications by the Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment are available at: www.pce.parliament.nz 3 Contents Contents 2 1 Introduction 7 3 1.1 The purpose of this report 8 1.2 Structure of report 9 1.3 What this report does not cover 9 2 Harnessing the power of water – hydroelectricity in New Zealand 11 2.1 Early hydroelectricity 13 2.2 The big dam era 15 2.3 Hydroelectricity in the twenty-first century 21 3 Wild and scenic rivers - a short history 23 3.1 Rivers were first protected in national parks 24 3.2 Legislation to protect wild and scenic rivers 25 3.3 Developing a national inventory 26 3.4 Water bodies of national importance 28 4 How wild and scenic rivers are protected 29 4.1 Protecting rivers using water conservation orders 29 4.2 Protecting rivers through conservation land 37 5 The electricity or the river – how the choice is made 43 5.1 Obtaining resource consents 44 5.2 Getting agreement to build on conservation land 47 6 Environment versus environment 49 6.1 What are the environmental benefits? 49 6.2 Comparing the two – a different approach
    [Show full text]
  • 2018/19 Collection
    BOUTIQUE ACCOMMODATION & EXPERIENCES IN NEW ZEALAND 2018/19 COLLECTION greenjourneys.co.nz ABOUT US About Green Journeys The Green Collection Green Journeys showcases the best New Zealand boutique accommodation & activities. We are a tourism industry marketing group dedicated to making it easier for you to create personalised itineraries which include a high standard of accommodation, hand- picked small group guided activities & private tours. Our brochure & website provide information to the travel trade & independent travellers, helping you find the best experiences & places to stay across a wide range of superb New Zealand destinations. All accommodation & activities can be booked direct via the links to their websites, through our recommended travel agents, or, for the travel trade, through most New Zealand inbound tour operators. www.greenjourneys.co.nz CONTENTS Contents Green Journeys Resources The Collection & Itineraries 1-2 Website 3 Travel Trade Tools 4 North Island Collection North Island Map 5 Northland 5-6 Auckland 5-8 The Coromandel 9-10 Bay of Plenty 10 Rotorua 11-13 Lake Taupo 13-14 Ruapehu 15 Hawkes Bay 16-17 Wellington 17-19 South Island Collection South Island Map 21 Canterbury 21-24, 33 & 39-40 Marlborough 24-27 Nelson Tasman 27-30 West Coast 30-36 Lake Wanaka 36-38 Waitaki 40-41 Dunedin 41-42 Central Otago 43-44 Queenstown 44-46 Fiordland 46-48 Southland 48-49 Getting Around Private Tours North Island 20 Private Tours South Island 50 Self-drive New Zealand 51 THE COLLECTION & ITINERARIES The Collection Our Collection has been hand-picked for the independent traveller who wants to experience luxury accommodations with stunning views, taste fresh local produce & spend time with hosts & guides passionate about their local area.
    [Show full text]
  • The Geology of the Oamaru District, North Otago," and Written by Professor James Park, of Otago University, Dunedin
    IJ bd Ml' '^^. ''i^o. ^ > h- '^3:ai\ 4^ # NEW ZEALAND. Pepavfm«?nt M fc\ of "3Rine&. GEOIjOaiCAL SIJUVBY BRA:N^CH[. (P. G. MORGAN, Director). BULLETIN No. 20 (New Series). ho THE GEOLOGY OF THE OAMARU DISTRICT NORTH OTAGO (EASTERN OTAGO DIVISION). BY JAMES PARK, F.G.S., Dean of the Mining Faculty, Otago University, Dunedin. ISSUED UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF THE HON. W. D. S. MaoDONALD, MINISTER OF MINES. WELLINGTON. BY AUTHORITY : MARCUS P. MARKS, GOVERNMENT PRINTER. 1918. Dlvisiorv , Otogo LccrvADist. , Oarruxru, District, Eastei-rvOta^o vet . accoTTLpany BxMetxrv mZO P.G.MORGAN. DIRECTOR. GEOLOGICAL MAP — :Bvlleti-rb2l°E0. Table Top Hill JSTcJ Oamaru Creek ' . ^ Landon Creek C 8 '8753 p P G MORGAN Section alon g Line EF, Papakaio and Oamaru Survey Districts. - DIRECTOR — ical — Reference to Geolo i^ Colours. A wamoa Sync/ine RECENT AND Branch of Waiareka Creek YOUNGER PLEISTOCENE River gravels, forming river flats and low terraces 800' Oamaru Creek Grant Stream OLDER PLEISTOCENE High level gravels The Sea AWAM AN Blue marine clays and sandy shell beds Section alon g Line CD. Awamoko and Oamaru Survey Districts. HUrCHINSONIAN Greensands and gleuconitic sandstones Deborah (= Hutchinson's Quarry) Limestone Awamoa Syncline OTOTARAN Deborah (^Mineral) Tuffs Waiareka Anticline Ui Z Oamaru Stone _ Kaiarero Creek Kakanui River Cape Wan brow O Waiareka Creek Main South M o WAIAREKAN Waiareka tuffs and minor lava flows. (pillow lavas).-- Awamoa Creek Main Trunk RIy. NG SEIdersl/e blue clays, micaceous sandstones, quartzose^ A PARAN with lignite seam.- The Sea igrits and conglomerates S 11 Section alon g Line AB, Oamaru Survey District.
    [Show full text]
  • Scanned Using Fujitsu 6670 Scanner and Scandall Pro Ver 1.7
    1487 1970/223 THE FRESHWATER FISHERIES REGULATIONS (SOUTH CANTERBURY AND WAITAKI VALLEY) MODIFICATION NOTICE 1970 PURSUANT to the Fisheries Act 1908 and the Freshwater Fisheries Regulations 1951, and, in relation to clause 4 (e) hereof, on the written application of the South Canterbury Acclimatisation Society and the Waitaki Valley Acclimatisation Society, the Minister of Marine hereby gives the following notice. NOTICE 1. Title-This notice may be cited as the Freshwater Fisheries Regulations (South Canterbury and Waitaki Valley) Modification Notice 1970. 2. Commencement-This notice shall come into force on the day after the date of its notification in the Gazette. 3. Application-This notice shall be in force only within the South Canterbury and Wa~taki Valley Acclimatisation Districts (including Lakes Aviemore and Benmore where it shall apply except as modified by the Fisheries Experimental Waters (Lakes Aviemore and Benmore) Regulations 1969*). 4. Modification of regulations-The Freshwater Fisheries Regulations 1951 t are hereby modified as follows: Limit Bag (a) No person shall on anyone day take or kill- (i) In the South Canterbury Acclimatisation District, more than 15 acclimatised fish (being trout or salmon), of which not more than 4 may be salmon and not more than 12 may be trout, of which trout not more than 4 may be taken from Lakes Alexandrina and McGregor, including their tributaries, and not more than 8 may be taken from any other lake or lakes, including their tributaries, or from rivers and their tributaries, west of Burke's Pass: (ii) In the Waitaki Valley Acclimatisation District, more than 10 acclimatised fish (being trout or salmon), of which not more than 4 may be salmon and not more than 8 may be trout: *S.R.
    [Show full text]
  • Friday 18 October 2019 Duration: 9.03Am-3.28Pm Morning Tea: 10.35Am-10.57Am Lunch: 12.35Pm-1.30Pm
    New Zealand Geographic Board Ngā Pou Taunaha o Aotearoa (NZGB) MINUTES Venue: Pōhutukawa and Nikau meeting rooms Level 7, Radio New Zealand House 155 The Terrace Wellington Friday 18 October 2019 Duration: 9.03am-3.28pm Morning tea: 10.35am-10.57am Lunch: 12.35pm-1.30pm NOTE: All information recorded in these Minutes relating to Treaty of Waitangi settlement place name proposals is confidential and is not available to the general public. Some of the information may become available after Deeds of Settlement are signed. General 1. Karakia | Welcome Matanuku Mahuika opened the hui with a karakia. Obituaries Matanuku Mahuika acknowledged the recent passing of Lee Smith of Ngāti Kahungunu and noted the assistance as a te reo Māori translator that Lee Smith had given to the NZGB at various times. The Chairperson acknowledged the recent passing of Tahu Potiki, former Chief Executive of Te Rūnanga o Ngāi Tahu. Welcome The Chairperson welcomed everyone to the hui. He welcomed observer Philip Green from Te Arawhiti and advised that other representatives from Te Arawhiti would join the meeting when agenda item 11 ‘Treaty advice’ and item 9 ‘Standard for Crown Protected Area names’ are discussed. He also welcomed Daniel Wainwright, on secondment as the NZGB’s Advisor responsible for Treaty Names, and other members of the NZGB Secretariat. The Chairperson congratulated Adrienne Staples on her reappointment to Wellington Regional Council. The Chairperson noted that Paulette Tamati-Elliffe would be late arriving due to flight disruption. 2. Present | Apologies NZGB members (9) Anselm Haanen, Chairperson Surveyor-General, Land Information New Zealand (LINZ) Adam Greenland National Hydrographer, LINZ David Barnes Federated Mountain Clubs of New Zealand Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Waitaki/Canterbury Basin
    GEOSCIENCES 09 Annual Conference Oamaru, NZ FIELD TRIP 11 WAITAKI/CANTERBURY BASIN Sunday 22 November to Monday 23 November Leader: Ewan Fordyce Geology Dept, University of Otago BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCE: Fordyce, E. (2009). Waitaki/Canterbury Basin. In: Turnbull, I.M. (ed.). Field Trip Guides, Geosciences 09 Conference, Oamaru, New Zealand. Geological Society of New Zealand Miscellaneous Publication 128B. 23 p. Introduction , Trip 11: Waitaki/Canterbury Basin Day 1 : short stop at Vanished World Centre [see also mid-conference trip #7]; Wharekuri Creek (Oligocene near-basin margin = a shoreline nearby in "drowned" NZ); Corbies Creek/Backyards (basement - Kaihikuan fossiliferous Triassic marine); Hakataramea Valley (Paleogene nonmarine to marine, including richly fossiliferous Oligocene, and Quaternary block faulting); Waihao Valley (if time permits - Eocene large forams and other warm-water fossils and/or Oligocene unconformities). Night in Waimate. Day 2 : Otaio Gorge (Paleogene-early Miocene nonmarine-marine sequence); Squires Farm (Oligocene unconformity); Makikihi (Plio-Pleistocene shallow marine to nonmarine fossiliferous strata); Elephant Hill Stream (Early Miocene; start of Neogene basin infill). Which localities are visited will depend on weather, time taken at early stops, and farm/quarry activities which normally don’t prevent access - but may occasionally. The guide draws on some material from earlier guides (Fordyce & Maxwell 2003, and others cited). Graphics, photos, and field observations, are by Ewan Fordyce unless indicated.
    [Show full text]
  • Tongariro Northern Circuit Brochure
    TONGARIRO NORTHERN CIRCUIT Duration: 3 – 4 days Great Walks season: Distance: 45 km (loop) 20 October 2017 – 30 April 2018 TONGARIRO ELEVATION PROFILE & TRACK GUIDE Oturere NORTHERN 1800 m 26 bunks 7 campsites CIRCUIT 1600 m Mangatepopo 20 bunks 7 campsites 1400 m From alpine herbfields to forests, Whakapapa Village and tranquil lakes to desert-like 1200 m plateaux, you’ll journey through 1100 m a landscape of stark contrasts 9.4 km / 4 hr 12 km / 5 hr with amazing views at every turn in this dual World Heritage site. Winding its way past Mount Tongariro and Mount Ngauruhoe, you will be dazzled on this circuit by dramatic volcanic landscapes and New Zealand’s rich geological and ancestral past. To the north is Lake Taupo, to the east the rugged Kaimanawa Day 1: Whakapapa Village Day 2: Mangatepopo Hut to range. On a clear day you may to Mangatepopo Hut Oturere Hut even catch a glimpse of Mount Taranaki on the west coast. 4 hours, 9.4 km 5 hours, 12 km The Tongariro Northern Circuit can be Your journey begins by making You join the popular Tongariro Alpine your way across the eroded Crossing on the second day, crossing walked in either direction. The track is plains of the Tongariro volcanic remnants of lava flows and climbing well marked and signposted, but some complex, a series of explosion steeply up Te Arawhata to the expansive sections may be steep, rough or muddy. craters and volcanic cones and Red Crater. Here you’ll be dazzled by This guide describes a 4-day clockwise peaks.
    [Show full text]
  • Nelson Lakes National Park in New Zealand
    Nelson Lakes National Park in New Zealand Lake Angelus, Nelson lakes national park, New Zealand Snow-capped rocky terrains, glacial lakes with insanely deep visibilty, alpine forests, and numerous crystal clear streams of icy freshwater are a part of the Nelson Lakes National Park. The alluring and secluded lakes – Rotoiti and Rotoroa – are an ideal getaways for travelers. Massive glaciers and several glacial landforms add to the magnificence of the National Park. History To preserve the ideology of native communities and precious habitats, Nelson Lakes National Park was established in 1956. As per Maori mythology, Nelson lakes were created by their chief Rakaihaitu. It is believed that he dug holes in the ground only with his ko (digging stick), which led to the formation of Lake Rotoiti and Lake Rotoroa. Activities in Nelson Lakes National Park Recreational activities such as boating, kayaking, camping, tramping, rafting, mountain biking, and ice skating are popular among the visitors. Hiking – From 30-minute walks to long hikes for 4-7 days, there are trails for every category of hikers. A walk through the spectacular landscape of the park is thrilling. You discover small cabins and huts near the tracks. Angelus Hut Tracks & Routes, Lake Rotoiti Short Walks, Travers-Sabine Circuit are widely preferred by the hikers. Birdwatching – Honeydew Beech Forest spreads over the lower regions of the park. Birdwatchers can look forward to spot Bellbirds, Fantails, Heron, Morepork, and Kaka as they saunter along. Exploring Wildlife – The Nelson Lakes National Park is home to a wide variety of wildlife including Red Deer, Chamois, and Hare.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Threatened Fauna in Nelson Lakes Area
    A history of threatened fauna in Nelson Lakes area SEPTEMBER 2009 A history of threatened fauna in Nelson Lakes area Kate Steffens and Paul Gasson 2009 Published by Department of Conservation Private Bag 5 Nelson, New Zealand Publ.info. © Copyright, New Zealand Department of Conservation Occasional Publication No. 81 ISSN 0113-3853 (print), 1178-4113 (online) ISBN 978-0-478-14678-3 (print), 978-0-478-14679-0 (online) Photo: Black-billed gulls nesting on the upper Wairau riverbed. Photo: Kate Steffens CONTENTS 1. Introduction 7 2. Great spotted kiwi (Apteryx haastii) 10 2.1 Status 10 2.2 Review of knowledge 10 2.2.1 North-eastern zone 10 2.2.2 Murchison zone 11 2.2.3 Southern Mountains zone 12 2.3 Trends in abundance and distribution 13 2.4 Threats 13 2.5 Information needs 13 2.6 Recommended management 14 3. Blue duck (Hymenolaimus malachorhynchos) 15 3.1 Status 15 3.2 Review of knowledge 15 3.2.1 North-eastern zone 15 3.2.2 Murchison zone 16 3.2.3 Southern Mountains zone 17 3.3 Trends in abundance and distribution 19 3.4 Threats 20 3.5 Information needs 20 3.6 Recommended management 20 4. New Zealand falcon (Falco novaeseelandiae) 21 4.1 Status 21 4.2 Review of knowledge 21 4.2.1 North-eastern zone 21 4.2.2 Murchison zone 22 4.2.3 Southern Mountains zone 22 4.3 Trends in abundance and distribution 22 4.4 Threats 23 4.5 Information needs 23 4.6 Recommended management 23 5.
    [Show full text]