Prospects for Provisional Arrangements in the West Philippine Sea Post- Arbitration
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Prospects for Provisional Arrangements in the West Philippine Sea Post- Arbitration Mary Fides A. Quintos The United Nations-Nippon Foundation Fellowship Programme 2015-2016 DISCLAIMER The views expressed herein are of the author’s alone and do not reflect the official position of the Foreign Service Institute, the Department of Foreign Affairs, the Government of the Philippines, the United Nations Division of Ocean Affairs and Law of the Sea, or the Australian National Centre for Ocean Resources and Security of the University of Wollongong. 1 Abstract The arbitration case between the Philippines and China over the West Philippine Sea seeks to clarify the geographical extent of the dispute by requesting the Tribunal to rule on the validity of China’s nine-dash line, and determine the legal status of specific features including the maritime zones that they can generate. Without resolving the issue of sovereignty and maritime delimitation, this paper argues that the Philippines and China will still have to eventually make an effort to enter into negotiations for provisional arrangements in the West Philippine Sea pending the reaching of a final agreement in accordance with their obligation under Articles 74/83 paragraph 3 of the Law of the Sea Convention. With the main objective of presenting possible courses of action post-arbitration, this paper reviewed relevant case studies on provisional arrangements of a practical nature, and the scope of unilateralism in other areas where there are maritime and territorial disputes. Drawing lessons from these cases and from the issues and challenges of previous co-operation arrangements in the South China Sea, this paper presented possible options for provisional arrangements in the West Philippine Sea with regard to living and non-living resources, maritime security, marine environment protection, seismic survey, and marine scientific research. This study also took into consideration post arbitration scenarios that include the areas of overlapping maritime claims being limited to the territorial sea generated by the disputed features; and if the areas of overlap are beyond 12 nm as a result of the features being entitled to a full effect and if the nine-dash line is considered a valid claim. 2 Acknowledgments My sincerest gratitude to all the officers and staff of the United Nations Division for Ocean Affairs and the Law of the Sea, especially to Ms Valentina Germani and Ms Simone Dempsey for their unrelenting support and motivation all throughout the fellowship programme. Many thanks also to The Nippon Foundation of Japan for its generosity and for providing this opportunity. I am greatly indebted to my supervisor, Professor Stuart Kaye, Director of Australian National Centre for Ocean Resources and Security, for his invaluable help and guidance in the drafting of this paper. Many thanks also to Ms Myree Mitchell for the assistance she has provided during the academic part of my fellowship. I also like to thank the Foreign Service Institute for allowing me to go after my dreams. Special thanks to my family, friends, and colleagues who have always been so encouraging. I am also very grateful for finding love and friendship in New York and Australia. 3 Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 6 1.1 Objectives and Scope .......................................................................................................................... 8 1.2 Overview of the Paper ........................................................................................................................ 9 1.3 Background and Context ..................................................................................................................... 9 Overlapping maritime zones ................................................................................................................. 9 Territorial disputes .............................................................................................................................. 10 Historic Rights Claims .......................................................................................................................... 12 Conflicting Exercise of Sovereignty and Sovereign Rights .................................................................. 14 The South China Sea Arbitration ......................................................................................................... 17 Chapter 1 Provisional Arrangements in Disputed Waters: History and Interpretation of the Law ............................ 21 I. Legislative History ........................................................................................................................... 23 II. Interpretation of the Provision ....................................................................................................... 26 Arrangements and Agreements .......................................................................................................... 27 Provisional Arrangements and Provisional Measures ........................................................................ 29 Two Distinct Obligations ..................................................................................................................... 32 Without Prejudice to Final Delimitation ............................................................................................. 35 Chapter 2 Case Studies on Cooperative and Unilateral Activities in Disputed Waters ............................................... 37 I. Provisional Arrangements of a Practical Nature ............................................................................. 37 United Kingdom – Argentina ............................................................................................................... 40 Iran – Sharjah (UAE) ............................................................................................................................ 43 Japan – USSR ....................................................................................................................................... 45 Japan – South Korea ............................................................................................................................ 47 The case of the Caribbean Sea ............................................................................................................ 49 Japan – Taiwan .................................................................................................................................... 51 II. Unilateral Actions Jeopardising/ Hampering Final Agreement ....................................................... 53 Chapter 3 Provisional Arrangements in the South China Sea: Issues and Challenges ................................................ 60 I. The practice of provisional arrangements of a practical nature in the South China Sea ............... 60 Joint Oceanographic and Marine Scientific Research Expedition (JOMSRE) ...................................... 60 4 Joint Marine Seismic Undertaking (JMSU) .......................................................................................... 63 II. Issues and Challenges ..................................................................................................................... 66 Chapter 4 Prospects for Provisional Arrangements in the South China Sea Post- Arbitration ................................... 73 I. Areas of overlapping maritime claims limited to the territorial sea surrounding the disputed features ................................................................................................................................................... 77 II. Areas of overlapping maritime claims beyond 12 nm .................................................................... 82 Fisheries .............................................................................................................................................. 84 Oil and gas resources .......................................................................................................................... 86 Marine Environment Protection ......................................................................................................... 89 Maritime Security................................................................................................................................ 91 Seismic Survey and Marine Scientific Research .................................................................................. 92 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................................... 94 5 Introduction The South China Sea has been the object of overlapping claims by several parties including the Philippines and China. The Philippines’ exclusive economic zone overlaps with China’s historical nine-dash line. Some insular features in the South China Sea that are being claimed by both parties also lie within or just outside the Philippine’s exclusive economic zone. The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (LOSC) stipulates various courses of action that states can utilize to manage or settle disputes. In areas of overlapping maritime claims, Articles 74 and 83 provide that states can choose to agree on the delimitation of their maritime zones, enter into provisional arrangements of a practical nature pending agreements,