FY19 Real Property Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

FY19 Real Property Report The Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office for Administration and Finance Report on the Real Property Owned and Leased by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Published February 15, 2019 Prepared by the Division of Capital Asset Management and Maintenance Carol W. Gladstone, Commissioner This page was intentionally left blank. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction and Report Organization 5 Table 1 Summary of Commonwealth-Owned Real Property by Executive Office 11 Total land acreage, buildings (number and square footage), improvements (number and area) Includes State and Authority-owned buildings Table 2 Summary of Commonwealth-Owned Real Property by County 17 Total land acreage, buildings (number and square footage), improvements (number and area) Includes State and Authority-owned buildings Table 3 Summary of Commonwealth-Owned Real Property by Executive Office and Agency 23 Total land acreage, buildings (number and square footage), improvements (number and area) Includes State and Authority-owned buildings Table 4 Summary of Commonwealth-Owned Real Property by Site and Municipality 85 Total land acreage, buildings (number and square footage), improvements (number and area) Includes State and Authority-owned buildings Table 5 Commonwealth Active Lease Agreements by Municipality 303 Private leases through DCAMM on behalf of state agencies APPENDICES Appendix I Summary of Commonwealth-Owned Real Property by Executive Office 311 Version of Table 1 above but for State-owned only (excludes Authorities) Appendix II County-Owned Buildings Occupied by Sheriffs and the Trial Court 319 Appendix III List of Conservation/Agricultural/Easements Held by the Commonwealth 323 Appendix IV Data Sources 381 Appendix V Glossary of Terms 385 Appendix VI Municipality Associated Counties Index Key 393 3 This page was intentionally left blank. 4 INTRODUCTION The Division of Capital Asset Management and Maintenance (DCAMM) is pleased to publish the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Real Property Report for 2019. The Report includes Commonwealth property, both owned and leased, and improvements at each facility, catalogued in a series of Tables. This report is the product of ongoing updating and refining of data and has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 7C, Section 39. The information contained therein was compiled and analyzed by the Commonwealth Asset Management Information System (“CAMIS”), an enterprise-wide platform overseen by the DCAMM Office of Finance and Administration to manage our land and building portfolio. REPORT ORGANIZATION This report contains five tables which provide different ways of organizing, analyzing and displaying information about property owned and leased by the Commonwealth. TABLE 1: SUMMARY OF COMMONWEALTH-OWNED REAL PROPERTY BY EXECUTIVE OFFICE This table shows groupings of Commonwealth-owned property by Executive Office and User Agency. The table lists the total land area in acres, the total number of buildings and improvements, and the gross square footage of all buildings and improvements for each User Agency and Executive Office. TABLE 2: SUMMARY OF COMMONWEALTH-OWNED REAL PROPERTY BY COUNTY This table shows grouping of Commonwealth-owned property by County and Executive Office. The table lists the total land area in acres, the total number of buildings and improvements, and the gross square footage of buildings and improvements for each Executive Office within each County. TABLE 3: COMMONWEALTH-OWNED REAL PROPERTY BY EXECUTIVE OFFICE AND AGENCY This table shows groupings of Commonwealth-owned property by Executive Office, User Agency and Facility. The facility or site name under each agency is alphabetical by municipality and shows the total land area in acres, the number of buildings and improvements, and gross square footage for each facility. Open land sites will not show structures or gross square feet. TABLE 4: BUILDINGS/IMPROVEMENTS AT EACH STATE FACILITY BY MUNICIPALITY This table provides a detailed list of Commonwealth-owned buildings and improvements at each Commonwealth facility. This table is organized by City and Town, showing alphabetically each State Agency managing a facility or overseeing a site in that municipality. The total acreage for each site is listed, the name of each building/improvement at that site is listed, and the total number of any same type structure (for instance 3 sheds) is listed, as well as the gross square footage of each structure. Open land sites will not show structures or gross square feet. Totals for Commonwealth property in each municipality are shown. This listing is determined by the reporting of all land and buildings/improvements in a city or town by either the User Agency or the Municipality. TABLE 5: ACTIVE LEASE AGREEMENTS This table lists sites occupied by a State Agency, but not owned by the Commonwealth. Table 5 provides the start and end date of the lease agreement, location of the space, and building usable square footage 5 occupied. For more detailed information about a specific lease agreement, please contact the Division of Capital Asset Management and Maintenance, Office of Leasing at (617) 727-8000. KEY FEATURES OF THE REAL PROPERTY REPORT Several enhancements were added to last year’s report format, and these are continued with the 2019 RPR: SEPARATE REPORTING FOR BUILDING VS. IMPROVEMENT DATA Tables 1 – 4 provide detail on the types of assets being reported. Data for vertical and horizontal improvements are reported separately from our major and minor buildings for greater transparency. DATA ON AUTHORITY-OWNED AND COUNTY-OWNED BUILDINGS Buildings owned by the UMass Building Authority (UMBA) and the Mass State College Building Authority (MSCBA) are an important part of the public higher education portfolio in Massachusetts. The RPR includes these buildings in portfolio totals and details found in Tables 1- 4. In Table 4, our most detailed listing of land and buildings, Authority-owned buildings are listed with their respective higher education campus – italicized in the report for easy identification. Appendix I provides a summary of just State-owned assets - excluding the Authority-owned buildings. Appendix II lists county-owned land and buildings that are occupied by various Sheriffs and Trial Court Departments. These buildings and associated land are not included in any other Tables in the report. REPORTING ON CONSERVATION AND AGRICULTURAL RESTRICTIONS, AND EASEMENTS Previous reports have included land with state conservation and agricultural restrictions along with certain easements as part of the Real Property Report “Owned” portfolio. In this year’s report they are separated out of the State-owned portfolio and instead are contained in Appendix III. This reflects formal ownership of these lands remaining with the private party. The Commonwealth owns only certain “development rights” tied to the property. NEW LEASING SUMMARY REPORT Table 5 this year features a new front-page summary of our private leases that aggregates the data by Secretariat. This is followed up by detail on lease agreements by municipality. ONGOING DATA QUALITY IMPROVEMENTS AND INTERIM REPORTING The annual Real Property Report presents a snapshot of a dynamic land and building portfolio. Since the last report was published in February 2018, DCAMM has continued with systematic quality review and technology enhancements for CAMIS reporting. Our work continues this year in partnership with our CAMIS user-agencies who have care and control of state facilities. 6 HOW TO FIND A STATE-OWNED PROPERTY If you know which State Agency manages or occupies a facility - See Appendix V, Glossary of Terms for a helpful explanation of the acronyms for agencies as well as other terms used in this report. Look in Table 1 to find the Executive office and Agency of a property. In Table 3 the same Executive office and Agency will be listed by municipality with all the properties under that agency. Finally, in Table 4 look up the Municipality and buildings/improvements will be listed under all facilities under each agency. For example, to find the Bay State Correctional Center knowing it is managed by DOC, you would find DOC in the Glossary of Terms spelled out as the Department of Correction. Looking up DOC in Table 1 you see DOC listed under the Executive Office of Public Safety. Looking through the section on the Executive Office of Public Safety in Table 3 indicates that the Bay State Correctional Center is located in Norfolk, and that its 18 improvements are located on 25 acres of land. A list of the improvement and building names for this facility is available in Table 4 under the municipality of Norfolk. If you know the city or town where the facility is located, but not the managing agency - See Table 4, Improvements at Each State Facility by Municipality. Table 4 will also show other facilities in the Municipality that are managed by other state agencies. To find out what facilities (sites) are managed by the same Agency statewide - See Table 3, where facility detailed information on Agencies is located. For example, under Environmental Affairs you will see that DCR (the Department of Conservation and Recreation) is the managing agency of the Henry Graf Skating Rink in Newburyport. In this Table you will see all other properties managed by DCR. To find more details about the Henry Graf Skating Rink go to Newburyport in Table 4. Here you’ll see the Skating Rink is 29,614 gross square feet. The Rink together with the other improvements occupies a site of 6.9 acres. To determine the geographic distribution of state-owned property - See Table 2, Summary of Commonwealth-Owned Real Property by County. If you want to compare how the properties are allocated between Executive Offices - See Table 1, Summary of Commonwealth-Owned Real Property by Executive Office. USING THE APPENDICES Appendix IV describes the Data Sources used to prepare this report. See the Glossary of Terms in Appendix V for an explanation of all User Agency Codes as well as any other abbreviations used in this report. This Appendix also defines technical terms used both in collecting data and in generating the report.
Recommended publications
  • Stony Brook Men's Basketball
    STONY BROOK MEN’S BASKETBALL 2017-18 GAME NOTES @STONYBROOKMBB STONYBROOK_MBB /STONYBROOKMBB WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 24, 2018 | 7 p.m. STONY BROOK MEN’S BASKETBALL SCHEDULE/RESULTS GAME 21: COSTELLO ATHLETIC CENTER | LOWELL, MASS. DATE OPPONENT TIME/SCORE NOVEMBER THE MATCHUP 10 vs Maryland^ L, 61-76 14 at UConn # L, 64-72 17 at Ball State # L, 76-87 STONY BROOK SEAWOLVES vs UMASS LOWELL RIVER HAWKS 19 at No. 2 Michigan State # L, 71, 93 @StonyBrookMBB @RiverHawksMBB 22 BROWN W, 77-64 26 BUCKNELL # L, 76-85 29 SHAWNEE STATE W, 101-58 2017-18 QUICK COMPARISON 8-12 (3-3 AE) ..... RECORD .....7-12 (1-5 AE) DECEMBER 2 ST. FRANCIS (PA) W, 85-83 71.6 ...........POINTS PER GAME .......... 74.8 4 at LIU Brooklyn L, 71-75 36.1 ........REBOUNDS PER GAME ....... 31.6 7 at Columbia W, 76-66 12 HOFSTRA L, 81-84 .427 ............ FIELD GOAL PCT. ........... .453 17 at Providence L, 60-62 .350 ...............3-POINT PCT. .............. .340 22 at Rutgers W, 75-73 (ot) 30 Norfolk State L, 68-74 JANUARY STONY BROOK QUICK LOOK UMASS LOWELL QUICK LOOK 3 MAINE* W, 71-70 HEAD COACH: JEFF BOALS (OHIO ‘95) HEAD COACH: PAT DUQUETTE (WILLIAMS ‘93) TH 6 at Hartford* W, 63-61 RECORD AT STONY BROOK: 26-26 (2ND YEAR) RECORD AT UML: 51-86 (5 YEAR) 10 at Albany* L, 65-78 OVERALL RECORD: SAME 13 at Vermont* L, 62-73 OVERALL RECORD: SAME 18 BINGHAMTON* W, 77-66 21 at New Hampshire* L, 51-53 STONY BROOK PROBABLE STARTERS UMASS LOWELL PROBABLE STARTERS 24 at UMass Lowell* 7 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Remediation General Permit Notice of Intent: Silver Lake High School, Kingston, MA: Signature Page, Plans, and Supporting Labora
    S . Signature Requirements : the Notice of Intent must be signed by the operator in accordance with the signatory requirements of 40 CFR Section 122 .22. including the following certification : 1 cert,y tinder penalty of law that thus document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, I certify that the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete . I cert f, that I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and inrprisonnrentfor knowing violations . Facility /Site Name : StIvev L.P kc/ d.. p $e.Loo ~ ~, 1 Operator signature: 1 Title : -,CL ~~ 1 Date: ZS 12-vv b Remediation General Permit -Notice of Intent 21 ~YIS,06 ~r FI UN 41IE xtsDA~ CHECK VALVE HUNG PARTICILATE FILTER AIR/WATER SEPARATOR OIL SCAVENGE LINE KNOCKOUT TANK 2' DISCHARGE PRESSIRE GAUGE (0-3 PSI ) INLET (2' NPT) AIR/OIL SEPARATOR TANK - OIL GAUGE i 55 LOW LEVEL SWITCH 0 AIR COOLED HEAT EXCHANGER 0 0 Tuthill Vacu um Systems EOPX - 100 Im UIL DG No. DRAWN : TM 0 lw/03 B997-A100 :56 A APPROVED : ff4E MA CAD FILE W : 996-452A 9EEI I IF 2 a N o® ®®® ®~ R o 1 1111 F =n 0 0 0 0 0 Horiick Co . inc. y ~u~n~uba.+a 91 Pxpn Pok piK s.w.
    [Show full text]
  • FY2005 Annual Report
    AnnAnnualual ReportReport 20052005 MassachusettsMassachusetts DivisionDivision ofof FisheriesFisheries && WildlifeWildlife Annual Report 2005 Massachusetts Division of fisheries & WilDlife Wayne F. MacCallum Director Jack Buckley Rob Deblinger, Ph.D. Deputy Director Deputy Director Administration Field Operations Table of Contents The Board Reports.............................................................................................4 Fisheries.............................................................................................................8 Wildlife.............................................................................................................17 Landowner Incentive Program .......................................................................29 Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program.........................................31 Information & Education................................................................................37 Hunter Education............................................................................................40 District Reports ...............................................................................................45 Wildlife Lands ..................................................................................................55 Federal Aid Program Administration..............................................................61 Maintenance and Development.......................................................................63 Legislative Report............................................................................................64
    [Show full text]
  • USGS 7.5-Minute Image Map for Naushon Island, Massachusetts
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NAUSHON ISLAND QUADRANGLE U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY MASSACHUSETTS-DUKES CO. O C 7.5-MINUTE SERIES L O O T C IS R 7ES0°52'30" 50' 47'30" 70°45' B K U 3 000m 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 D 44 E 45 46 48 49 50 51 52 53 860 000 FEET 41°30' 41°30' K N U H Y T T U G H IN C S - S O D R R C FO D Y E R B R FE W E N 4595 4595000mN Mount 2 64C0 a00r0y Silver Beach FEET 100 0 0 1 45 0 94 0 1 5 0 4594 50 South Bluff " Elizabeth Islands " Kettle " " " " " Cove " " " " " Rams Head Tarpaulin 4593 H î " î H " " " " " ove " C H " "" " " î î """ î "H " " H " 4593 50 50 Blaney 0 nd 5 Po Naushon Island " " î H " H " H " H " " î " î î " H H " " Hî î î î î " î " Hî H î î H " î H H î " H " î " " î H " H î î " " H " H î " H ove Light î C î in î î ul î H Tarpa H H " H " î H î H H î " H î î H î " " H " H " " H H H "" î H î " " î H î ch H a î e î î B H nt " H H ce î es î r î C H H H " H î î " î " " H " î H " H H 5 " î H " î " î î H î î î H H î H H H H î H H " 0 H î " î î " " " î " " " " î H " H " " î î H î " î H î î " î " H H H " " H î H î " î î " î î H H î î î " H î H H î " H H H î " " î î î î H " H î H H " H " H î î " " î " î H î H " " î î " H î " " H î H î " " î î " " î " H H " î " î " " H " " H î " " " " H " î H H î " î " H H H î H " î H " î " î H H H î î î î " î H 10 î 0 î H " î H H " H î " " î " H î î " " H î H H " " " " " î 45 î " " " î H î H " î î 92 " H î H H H" H " " " H H H H î î " " î H î " î " î " î " H î î H î î î î H î H " " " î " " H " î î H H î " H " î H" H" H î " î H " " H" " " " " î " î î " î H î "" " " î H î " î H " H î " " î
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2018
    Massachusetts Division of Fisheries & Wildlife 2018 Annual Report 147 Annual Report 2018 Massachusetts Division of Fisheries & Wildlife Jack Buckley Director (July 2017–May 2018) Mark S. Tisa, Ph.D., M.B.A. Acting Director (May–June 2018) 149 Table of Contents 2 The Board Reports 6 Fisheries 42 Wildlife 66 Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program 82 Information & Education 95 Archivist 96 Hunter Education 98 District Reports 124 Wildlife Lands 134 Federal Aid 136 Staff and Agency Recognition 137 Personnel Report 140 Financial Report Appendix A Appendix B About the Cover: MassWildlife staff prepare to stock trout at Lake Quinsigamond in Worcester with the help of the public. Photo by Troy Gipps/MassWildlife Back Cover: A cow moose stands in a Massachusetts bog. Photo by Bill Byrne/MassWildlife Printed on Recycled Paper. ELECTRONIC VERSION 1 The Board Reports Joseph S. Larson, Ph.D. Chairperson Overview fective April 30, 2018, and the Board voted the appoint- ment of Deputy Director Mark Tisa as Acting Director, The Massachusetts Fisheries and Wildlife Board con- effective Mr. Buckley’s retirement. The Board -mem sists of seven persons appointed by the Governor to bers expressed their gratitude and admiration to the 5-year terms. By law, the individuals appointed to the outgoing Director for his close involvement in develop- Board are volunteers, receiving no remuneration for ing his staff and his many accomplishments during his their service to the Commonwealth. Five of the sev- tenure, not only as Director but over his many years as en are selected on a regional basis, with one member, Deputy Director in charge of Administration, primarily by statute, representing agricultural interests.
    [Show full text]
  • American Beech in Coastal New England: Forest History and Dynamics
    American beech in coastal New England: forest history and dynamics A thesis presented by Posy Elizabeth Busby to The Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Harvard University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Forest Science Harvard Forest Harvard University June 2006 Acknowledgements I am grateful to many people for helping me develop this thesis. First, I would like to thank my advisers: Glenn Motzkin, David Foster, Charlie Canham, and Missy Holbrook. Discussions with David sparked an early interest in exploring the history of Naushon’s beech forests. Missy has been a devoted mentor throughout my undergraduate and graduate education at Harvard, while more recently I have been fortunate to work closely with Charlie on tree ring analyses and other quantitative aspects of this thesis. Over the past few years I have benefited greatly from Glenn’s vast knowledge of the natural history and ecology of the Northeast, and his eagerness to teach and inspire students. I would also like to thank John Burk, Anne Marie Casper, Brian DeGasperis, Elaine Doughty, Paul Elias, Ed Faison, Chris Graham, Brian Hall, Brooks Mathewson, Rob McDonald, Brandon McElroy, Jason McLachlan, Peter Thomas, and Jill Thompson for assisting with field work. Gon and Holly Leon and Ren Davidson graciously welcomed this large crew into their home for a busy week of fieldwork. Additionally, Paul Elias, Gon and Holly, and Bruce Bagley provided valuable historical information and logistical support. Brian Hall provided assistance with GIS mapping, and Bryan Black and Neil Pederson helped with tree ring analysis. Jason McLachlan, David Orwig, and Wyatt Oswald provided comments on an earlier draft of Chapter 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Recommended Time of Year Restrictions (Toys) for Coastal Alteration Projects to Protect Marine Fisheries Resources in Massachusetts
    Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Technical Report TR-47 Recommended Time of Year Restrictions (TOYs) for Coastal Alteration Projects to Protect Marine Fisheries Resources in Massachusetts N. T. Evans, K. H. Ford, B. C. Chase, and J. J. Sheppard Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs Department of Fish and Game Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Technical Report Technical April 2011 Revised January 2015 Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Technical Report Series Managing Editor: Michael P. Armstrong Scientific Editor: Bruce T. Estrella The Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Technical Reports present information and data pertinent to the management, biology and commercial and recreational fisheries of anadromous, estuarine, and marine organisms of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and adjacent waters. The series presents information in a timely fashion that is of limited scope or is useful to a smaller, specific audience and therefore may not be appropriate for national or international journals. Included in this series are data summaries, reports of monitoring programs, and results of studies that are directed at specific management problems. All Reports in the series are available for download in PDF format at: http://www.mass.gov/marinefisheries/publications/technical.htm or hard copies may be obtained from the Annisquam River Marine Fisheries Station, 30 Emerson Ave., Gloucester, MA 01930 USA (978-282-0308). TR-1 McKiernan, D.J., and D.E. Pierce. 1995. The Loligo squid fishery in Nantucket and Vineyard Sound. TR-2 McBride, H.M., and T.B. Hoopes. 2001. 1999 Lobster fishery statistics. TR-3 McKiernan, D.J., R. Johnston, and W.
    [Show full text]
  • T Ro U T Sto C K E D Wat E Rs
    2021 MASSACHUSETTS TROUT STOCKED WATERS WESTERN DISTRICT Daily stocking updates can be viewed at Mass.gov/Trout. All listed waters are stocked in the spring. Bold waters are stocked in spring and fall. ADAMS: Dry Brook, Hoosic River FLORIDA: Cold River, Deerfield River, North Pond ALFORD: Green River GOSHEN: Stones Brook, Swift River,Upper Highland Lake ASHFIELD: Ashfield Pond, Clesson Brook, South River, Swift River, Upper Branch GRANVILLE: Hubbard River BECKET: Greenwater Pond, Walker Brook, West GREAT BARRINGTON: Green River, Mansfield Pond, Branch Westfield River, Yokum Brook West Brook, Williams River BLANDFORD: Potash Brook HANCOCK: Berry Pond, Kinderhook Creek BUCKLAND: Clesson Brook, Deerfield River HAWLEY: Chickley River CHARLEMONT: Chickley River, Cold River, Deerfield HINSDALE: East Branch Housatonic River, Plunkett River, Pelham Brook Reservoir, Windsor Brook CHESHIRE: Dry Brook, Hoosic River, South Brook HUNTINGTON: Little River, Littleville Lake, Middle Branch Westfield River, Norwich Pond, West Branch CHESTER: Littleville Lake, Middle Branch Westfield Westfield River, Westfield River River, Walker Brook, West Branch Westfield River LANESBOROUGH: Pontoosuc Lake, Town Brook CHESTERFIELD: West Branch Brook, Westfield River LEE: Beartown Brook, Goose Pond Brook, CLARKSBURG: Hudson Brook, North Branch Hoosic Greenwater Brook, Hop Brook, Housatonic River, River Laurel Lake, West Brook CUMMINGTON: Mill Brook, Swift River, Westfield LENOX: Yokun Brook Brook, Westfield River MIDDLEFIELD: Factory Brook, Middle Branch DALTON: East
    [Show full text]
  • Body of Report
    Streamflow Measurements, Basin Characteristics, and Streamflow Statistics for Low-Flow Partial-Record Stations Operated in Massachusetts from 1989 Through 1996 By Kernell G. Ries, III Abstract length; mean basin slope; area of surficial stratified drift; area of wetlands; area of water bodies; and A network of 148 low-flow partial-record mean, maximum, and minimum basin elevation. stations was operated on streams in Massachusetts Station descriptions and calculated streamflow during the summers of 1989 through 1996. statistics are also included in the report for the 50 Streamflow measurements (including historical continuous gaging stations used in correlations measurements), measured basin characteristics, with the low-flow partial-record stations. and estimated streamflow statistics are provided in the report for each low-flow partial-record station. Also included for each station are location infor- INTRODUCTION mation, streamflow-gaging stations for which flows were correlated to those at the low-flow Streamflow statistics are useful for design and operation of reservoirs for water supply and partial-record station, years of operation, and hydroelectric generation, sewage-treatment facilities, remarks indicating human influences of stream- commercial and industrial facilities, agriculture, flows at the station. Three or four streamflow mea- maintenance of streamflows for fisheries and wildlife, surements were made each year for three years and recreational users. These statistics provide during times of low flow to obtain nine or ten mea- indications of reliability of water resources, especially surements for each station. Measured flows at the during times when water conservation practices are low-flow partial-record stations were correlated most likely to be needed to protect instream flow and with same-day mean flows at a nearby gaging other uses.
    [Show full text]
  • Binghamton University Athletics
    2014-15 BINGHAMTON SCHEDULE/RESULTS 2014-15 BEARCAT BASKETBALL NOTES OVERALL: 5-25 AMERICA EAST: 4-11 HOME: 4-9 • AWAY: 1-14 • NEUTRAL: 0-2 NOVEMBER 1 Sat. MANSFIELD (exhib.) W 66-60 7 Fri. OSWEGO ST. (exhib.) W 75-74 BINGHAMTON 14 Fri. !@ Notre Dame (ESPN3) L 39-82 17 Mon. !@ Providence (Fox Sports 1) L 45-66 19 Wed. HARTWICK W 82-51 GAME 31 22 Sat. ! Manhattan (ESPN3) L 63-78 Saturday, Feb. 28, 2015 - 2 p.m. 23 Sun. ! Navy (ESPN3) L 68-70 25 Tue. @ Army L 54-80 Events Center, Vestal, N.Y. 29 Sat. CORNELL L 54-68 DECEMBER 3 Wed. @ Boston University L 65-77 6 Sat. PENN L 70-79 BINGHAMTON BINGHAMTON UMBC 8 Mon. CALDWELL L 52-63 BEARCATS RETRIEVERS 11 Thu. @ Colgate L 44-65 vs. 14 Sun. @ Boston College (ESPN 3) L 49-63 LAST TIME OUT LAST TIME OUT 20 Sat. ST. BONAVENTURE L 51-69 L, 64-52 at Stony Brook (2/21) UMBC L, 67-49 vs. Albany (2/25) 22 Mon. @ Mt. St. Mary’s L 68-69 30 Tue. BUFFALO L 50-76 JANUARY LEADERS SERIES HISTORY LEADERS 2 Fri. *@ UMass Lowell L 40-50 PPG Binghamton leads 14-12 PPG 7 Wed. *@ Hartford L 59-69 10 Sat. *MAINE W 65-46 W. Rodriguez 11.3 C. Joyce, 13.3 RPG 14 Wed. *@ Albany (ESPN 3) L 58-73 RPG LAST MEETING 17 Sat. *NEW HAMPSHIRE (ot) L 66-73 W. Rodriguez, 5.3 C. Joyce, 5.7 19 Mon. *@ Vermont L 44-64 Binghamton 68, UMBC 56 (1-28-15) APG 25 Sun.
    [Show full text]
  • Women's Basketball 2013-14
    UMassWOMEN’S BASKETBALL Lowell 2013-14 Overall AE UMass Lowell at Yale 2013-14 Schedule Record Record Date Opponent Tuesday, November, 12 2013 • 7:00 p.m. November Sat. 9 PROVIDENCE 109, UML 74 0-1 0-0 New Haven, Conn. Tue. 12 at Yale 7:00 Last Time Out: The River Hawks had three players in Sat. 16 HOLY CROSS 2:00 double-figures, but it wasn’t enough as UMass Lowell fell Sat. 23 at St. Francis, NY 2:00 109-74 to Providence Saturday afternoon at Costello Athletic Tue. 26 at Oklahoma State 7:00 Center. Sophomore Melissa Frase led with 16 points, while Wed. 27 at Nebraska 8:00 freshman Nicole Hayner and junior Shannon Samuels had December 15 and 14 points respectively. Sophomore Lindsey Doucette Sun. 1 *at Vermont 2:00 grabbed 11 rebounds. Wed. 4 at Old Dominion 11:00 Sat. 7 at Seton Hall 2:00 Tue. 10 at Rhode Island 7:00 Lots of New Faces: Sun. 15 at Central Connecticut 1:00 The River Hawks welcome nine freshmen and two junior Fri. 20 at Bryant 11:00 transfers this season. They will join five returning players January from last season. Thu. 7 *BINGHAMTON 7:00 Sat. 11 *at UMBC 1:00 Scouting the River Hawks: Mon. 13 MOUNT IDA 6:00 UMass Lowell has a virtually new squad, with 11 newcom- Wed. 16 *ALBANY 7:00 ers and five veterans. Back from last season is sophomore Sat. 18 *at Stony Brook 4:00 forward Lindsey Doucette (4.8 ppg) and sophomore guard Mon.
    [Show full text]
  • Methods for Estimating Low-Flow Statistics for Massachusetts Streams
    U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Methods for Estimating Low-Flow Statistics for Massachusetts Streams By KERNELL G. RIES, III and PAUL J. FRIESZ Water-Resources Investigations Report 00-4135 Prepared in cooperation with the MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, OFFICE OF WATER RESOURCES Northborough, Massachusetts 2000 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles G. Groat, Director The use of trade or product names in this report is for identification purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey. For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: Chief, Massachusetts–Rhode Island District U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Information Services Water Resources Division Box 25286 10 Bearfoot Road Denver, CO 80225-0286 Northborough, MA 01532 or through our web site at http://ma.water.usgs.gov Methods for Estimating Low-Flow Statistics for Massachusetts Streams By Kernell G. Ries, III, and Paul J. Friesz Abstract Regression equations were developed to estimate the natural, long-term 99-, 98-, 95-, 90-, 85-, 80-, Methods and computer software are 75-, 70-, 60-, and 50-percent duration flows; the described in this report for determining flow- 7-day, 2-year and the 7-day, 10-year low flows; duration, low-flow frequency statistics, and August and the August median flow for ungaged sites in median flows. These low-flow statistics can be Massachusetts. Streamflow statistics and basin estimated for unregulated streams in Mass- characteristics for 87 to 133 streamgaging achusetts using different methods depending on stations and low-flow partial-record stations whether the location of interest is at a stream- were used to develop the equations.
    [Show full text]