DOCSLIB.ORG

Assessment of Natural Resource Conditions in and Adjacent to Acadia National Park, Maine

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Assessment of Natural Resource Conditions in and Adjacent to Acadia National Park, Maine National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Assessment of natural resource conditions in and adjacent to Acadia National Park, Maine Natural Resource Report NPS/NRPC/WRD/NRR—2008/069 ON THE COVER Clockwise, from top left: Maple Spring Bridge, view from Sargent Mountain, ferns near Sieur de Monts Spring, water striders on Hadlock Brook, Cañon Brook near Murray Young trail, sunrise from Schoodic Point in winter, Jesup Path in autumn, Cañon Brook in winter. Center: trail signpost near Cadillac Mountain. All photos: Sarah Nelson or Ken Johnson. Assessment of natural resource conditions in and adjacent to Acadia National Park Natural Resource Report NPS/NRPC/WRD/NRR—2008/069 Peter D. Vaux (1) Sarah J. Nelson (1) Nishi Rajakaruna (2) Glen Mittelhauser (3) Kathleen Bell (4) Blaine Kopp (5) John Peckenham (1) Gordon Longsworth (2) (1) Senator George J. Mitchell Center for Environmental and Watershed Research University of Maine, Orono, Maine 04469 (2) College of the Atlantic, Bar Harbor, Maine 04609 (3) Maine Natural History Observatory, Gouldsboro, Maine 04607 (4) Dept. of Resource Economics and Policy, University of Maine, Orono, Maine 04469 (5) 48 Winthrop St., Hallowell, ME 04347 This report was prepared under Task Order J4506060620 of the North Atlantic Coast Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit (Cooperative Agreement between the National Park Service and University of Maine, 1443CA4520-99-007, amendment #2) November 2008 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado The Natural Resource Publication series addresses natural resource topics that are of interest and applicability to a broad readership in the National Park Service and to others in the management of natural resources, including the scientific community, the public, and the NPS conservation and environmental constituencies. Manuscripts are peer-reviewed to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and is designed and published in a professional manner. Natural Resource Reports are the designated medium for disseminating high priority, current natural resource management information with managerial application. The series targets a general, diverse audience, and may contain NPS policy considerations or address sensitive issues of management applicability. Examples of the diverse array of reports published in this series include vital signs monitoring plans; monitoring protocols; "how to" resource management papers; proceedings of resource management workshops or conferences; annual reports of resource programs or divisions of the Natural Resource Program Center; resource action plans; fact sheets; and regularly-published newsletters. Views, statements, findings, conclusions, recommendations and data in this report are solely those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect views and policies of the U.S. Department of the Interior, NPS. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the National Park Service. Printed copies of reports in these series may be produced in a limited quantity and they are only available as long as the supply lasts. This report is also available from the Water Resources Division of the National Park Service website (http://www.nature.nps.gov/water/wrdpub.cfm) or http://www.nature.nps.gov/publications/NRPM/ on the internet, or by sending a request to the address on the back cover. Please cite this publication as: Vaux, P. D., S. J. Nelson, N. Rajakaruna, G. Mittelhauser, K. Bell, B. Kopp, J. Peckenham, and G. Longsworth. 2008. Assessment of natural resource conditions in and adjacent to Acadia National Park, Maine. Natural Resource Report NPS/NRPC/WRD/NRR—2008/069. National Park Service, Fort Collins, Colorado. NPS D-344, November 2008 ii Contents Figures.......................................................................................................................................... viii Tables ............................................................................................................................................ xii Acronyms and Abbreviations ........................................................................................................ xiii Executive Summary...................................................................................................................... xv Acknowledgements.....................................................................................................................xviii Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Park Description.............................................................................................................................. 3 Size and Location of Park Lands and Conservation Easements ..................................................... 3 Location and Extent of the Upland, Freshwater, Wetland and Marine/Coastal Systems ............... 6 Legislative Background and Management Objectives ................................................................... 9 Human Utilization of Park Resources ............................................................................................. 9 Terrestrial, Freshwater and Coastal/Marine Resources ................................................................ 17 Terrestrial Systems........................................................................................................................ 17 Physico-Chemical Environment of Terrestrial Systems ................................................... 17 Biological Resources of Terrestrial Systems .................................................................... 19 Freshwater Systems (Lakes, Streams, Riparian Systems, Wetlands and Groundwater) .............. 33 Physico-Chemical Environment of Freshwater Systems .................................................. 33 Biological Resources of Freshwater Systems ................................................................... 47 Marine / Coastal Systems .............................................................................................................. 56 Physico-Chemical Environment of Marine / Coastal Systems ......................................... 56 Biological Resources of Marine / Coastal Systems .......................................................... 59 Assessment of Threats .................................................................................................................. 64 iii Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 64 Ultraviolet Radiation ..................................................................................................................... 65 Visibility Impairments .................................................................................................................. 67 Ozone ............................................................................................................................................ 67 Atmospheric Ozone Levels ............................................................................................... 67 Ozone Impacts on Terrestrial Vegetation ......................................................................... 70 Atmospheric Deposition (Acidity and Related Chemistry) .......................................................... 71 Atmosphere: Deposition Chemistry .................................................................................. 72 Impacts of Atmospheric Acidity on Terrestrial Systems .................................................. 76 Impacts of Atmospheric Nitrogen on Terrestrial Vegetation ........................................... 76 Impacts of Atmospheric Deposition on Freshwater Systems ........................................... 79 Atmospheric Nitrogen Deposition to Coastal and Marine Systems ................................. 83 Mercury ......................................................................................................................................... 84 Atmospheric Sources ........................................................................................................ 84 Mercury in Terrestrial Systems ......................................................................................... 86 Mercury in Freshwater Systems (Abiotic Components) ................................................... 87 Mercury in Terrestrial and Freshwater Biota .................................................................... 89 Mercury in Marine Systems .............................................................................................. 92 Nutrient Enrichment ...................................................................................................................... 95 Nutrient Enrichment: Terrestrial Systems ........................................................................ 95 Nutrient Enrichment: Lakes and Streams ......................................................................... 95 Nutrient Enrichment: Wetlands and Estuaries .................................................................. 98 Nutrient Enrichment: Other Coastal and Marine Areas .................................................. 103 Microbial Contamination ...........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Populusspp. Family: Salicaceae Aspen
    Populus spp. Family: Salicaceae Aspen Aspen (the genus Populus) is composed of 35 species which contain the cottonwoods and poplars. Species in this group are native to Eurasia/north Africa [25], Central America [2] and North America [8]. All species look alike microscopically. The word populus is the classical Latin name for the poplar tree. Populus grandidentata-American aspen, aspen, bigtooth aspen, Canadian poplar, large poplar, largetooth aspen, large-toothed poplar, poplar, white poplar Populus tremuloides-American aspen, American poplar, aspen, aspen poplar, golden aspen, golden trembling aspen, leaf aspen, mountain aspen, poplar, popple, quaking asp, quaking aspen, quiver-leaf, trembling aspen, trembling poplar, Vancouver aspen, white poplar Distribution Quaking aspen ranges from Alaska through Canada and into the northeastern and western United States. In North America, it occurs as far south as central Mexico at elevations where moisture is adequate and summers are sufficiently cool. The more restricted range of bigtooth aspen includes southern Canada and the northern United States, from the Atlantic coast west to the prairie. The Tree Aspens can reproduce sexually, yielding seeds, or asexually, producing suckers (clones) from their root system. In some cases, a stand could then be composed of only one individual, genetically, and could be many years old and cover 100 acres (40 hectares) or more. Most aspen stands are a mosaic of several clones. Aspen can reach heights of 120 ft (48 m), with a diameter of 4 ft (1.6 m). Aspen trunks can be quite cylindrical, with little taper and few limbs for most of their length. They also can be very crooked or contorted, due to genetic variability.
    [Show full text]
  • Willows of Interior Alaska
    1 Willows of Interior Alaska Dominique M. Collet US Fish and Wildlife Service 2004 2 Willows of Interior Alaska Acknowledgements The development of this willow guide has been made possible thanks to funding from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service- Yukon Flats National Wildlife Refuge - order 70181-12-M692. Funding for printing was made available through a collaborative partnership of Natural Resources, U.S. Army Alaska, Department of Defense; Pacific North- west Research Station, U.S. Forest Service, Department of Agriculture; National Park Service, and Fairbanks Fish and Wildlife Field Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Department of the Interior; and Bonanza Creek Long Term Ecological Research Program, University of Alaska Fairbanks. The data for the distribution maps were provided by George Argus, Al Batten, Garry Davies, Rob deVelice, and Carolyn Parker. Carol Griswold, George Argus, Les Viereck and Delia Person provided much improvement to the manuscript by their careful editing and suggestions. I want to thank Delia Person, of the Yukon Flats National Wildlife Refuge, for initiating and following through with the development and printing of this guide. Most of all, I am especially grateful to Pamela Houston whose support made the writing of this guide possible. Any errors or omissions are solely the responsibility of the author. Disclaimer This publication is designed to provide accurate information on willows from interior Alaska. If expert knowledge is required, services of an experienced botanist should be sought. Contents
    [Show full text]
  • A Walk in the Park and Silver Maple, with the Best Features of Each
    11. Autumn Blaze Maple (Acer x Freemanii) 16. Northern Red Oak (Quercus rubra ) Memorial Tree. This tree is a hybrid cross of red Similar in size to the white oak but has leaves A Walk in the Park and silver maple, with the best features of each. that have 5-11 lobes with pointed tips Freeman maple cultivars typically grow fast and tapered from a broad base. Acorn is 1 inch Nature’s Canopy at have deeply lobed leaves with good structural long, with shallow cup and bitter taste. A Maple Street Park stability, and great fall color (like the red maple). It tree can produce 1,500 acorns annually. Bark grows well in challenging urban conditions. is smooth on young trees, has unbroken Essex Junction, Vermont vertical ridges on older ones. It needs lots of 12. White Pine (Pinus strobus ) A stately tree that is sunlight and is competitive on sandy soils. the only pine in the East with 5 needles in each Not a common city tree because it is difficult bundle. It reaches heights of 140 ft. and lives up to to grow successfully from a seedling. Wildlife 20 years. In pre-revolutionary times they were the love it because of the nutrients its acorns used for ship masts. It is often split into multiple provide. Red oak is a key host of gypsy stems high up due to the feeding of the terminal moths. bud by the white pine weevil ( Pissodes strobe ). Trees with this form are called cabbage pines. 17. Paper Birch (Betula papyrifera ) A pioneer 13.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Common Native Plants the Diversity of Acadia National Park Is Refl Ected in Its Plant Life; More Than 1,100 Plant Species Are Found Here
    National Park Service Acadia U.S. Department of the Interior Acadia National Park Checklist of Common Native Plants The diversity of Acadia National Park is refl ected in its plant life; more than 1,100 plant species are found here. This checklist groups the park’s most common plants into the communities where they are typically found. The plant’s growth form is indicated by “t” for trees and “s” for shrubs. To identify unfamiliar plants, consult a fi eld guide or visit the Wild Gardens of Acadia at Sieur de Monts Spring, where more than 400 plants are labeled and displayed in their habitats. All plants within Acadia National Park are protected. Please help protect the park’s fragile beauty by leaving plants in the condition that you fi nd them. Deciduous Woods ash, white t Fraxinus americana maple, mountain t Acer spicatum aspen, big-toothed t Populus grandidentata maple, red t Acer rubrum aspen, trembling t Populus tremuloides maple, striped t Acer pensylvanicum aster, large-leaved Aster macrophyllus maple, sugar t Acer saccharum beech, American t Fagus grandifolia mayfl ower, Canada Maianthemum canadense birch, paper t Betula papyrifera oak, red t Quercus rubra birch, yellow t Betula alleghaniesis pine, white t Pinus strobus blueberry, low sweet s Vaccinium angustifolium pyrola, round-leaved Pyrola americana bunchberry Cornus canadensis sarsaparilla, wild Aralia nudicaulis bush-honeysuckle s Diervilla lonicera saxifrage, early Saxifraga virginiensis cherry, pin t Prunus pensylvanica shadbush or serviceberry s,t Amelanchier spp. cherry, choke t Prunus virginiana Solomon’s seal, false Maianthemum racemosum elder, red-berried or s Sambucus racemosa ssp.
    [Show full text]
  • Genotoxic and Antigenotoxic Effects of Fucus Vesiculosus Extract on Cultured Human Lymphocytes Using the Chromosome Aberration and Comet Assays
    Genetics and Molecular Biology, 30, 1, 105-111 (2007) Copyright by the Brazilian Society of Genetics. Printed in Brazil www.sbg.org.br Research Article Genotoxic and antigenotoxic effects of Fucus vesiculosus extract on cultured human lymphocytes using the chromosome aberration and Comet assays Cleide Leite-Silva1, Cássia Lima Silva Gusmão1, Catarina Satie Takahashi1,2 1Departamento de Genética, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil. 2Departamento de Biologia, Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil. Abstract The brown seaweed Fucus vesiculosus (Fucales, Fucaceae) was screened for its protective activity using doxo- rubicin-induced DNA damage in human lymphocytes. In this study, we assessed the genotoxic and antigenotoxic potential of three different concentrations (0.25, 0.5 and 1.0 mg mL-1)ofF. vesiculosus aqueous extract using the chromosome aberration and Comet assays. Treatment of human lymphocyte cultures with 0.25, 0.5 and 1.0 mg mL-1 F. vesiculosus aqueous extract had no effect on the chromosome aberration frequency or on the extent of DNA dam- age detected by the Comet assay. The antigenotoxic effects of the extract were tested in human lymphocyte cultures treated with 15 μgmL-1 of doxorubicin, either alone or combined with the different concentrations of the extract, which was added to the cultures before, simultaneously with or after the doxorubicin. Only when lymphocytes were pre-treated with extract there was a reduction in doxorubicin-induced chromosome aberrations and DNA damage as detected by the Comet assay.
    [Show full text]
  • Polychlorinated Biphenyls and Organochlorine Pesticide Concentrations in Whole Body Mummichog and Banded Killifish from the Anacostia River Watershed: 2018-2019
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Polychlorinated Biphenyls and Organochlorine Pesticide Concentrations in Whole Body Mummichog and Banded Killifish from the Anacostia River Watershed: 2018-2019 CBFO-C-20-01 Left: Mummichog, female (L), male (R); Right: Banded killifish, left two are males, right two are females. Photos: Fred Pinkney, USFWS U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Chesapeake Bay Field Office June 2020 Polychlorinated Biphenyls and Organochlorine Pesticide Concentrations in Whole Body Mummichog and Banded Killifish from the Anacostia River Watershed: 2018-2019 CBFO-C20-01 Prepared by Alfred E. Pinkney U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Chesapeake Bay Field Office Annapolis, MD and Elgin S. Perry Statistical Consultant Colonial Beach, VA Prepared for Dev Murali Government of the District of Columbia Department of Energy and Environment Washington, DC June 2020 ABSTRACT In 2018 and 2019, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Chesapeake Bay Field Office (CBFO) monitored polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) and organochlorine (OC) pesticide concentrations in whole body samples of forage fish. Fish were collected along the mainstem Anacostia River, Kingman Lake, five major tributaries, and (as a reference) a section of the Potomac River. Mummichog (Fundulus heteroclitus; referred to as MC in this report) and banded killifish (F. diaphanus BK) were chosen because of their high site fidelity and widespread presence in the watersheds. The objectives are to: 1) establish a pre-remedial baseline of these contaminants in fish from the Anacostia mainstem and major tributaries, Kingman Lake, and the Potomac River; 2) compare total PCB, total chlordane, and total DDT among sampling locations; and 3) interpret patterns in PCB homologs.
    [Show full text]
  • Winter 2016 Volume 21 No
    Fall/Winter 2016 Volume 21 No. 3 A Magazine about Acadia National Park and Surrounding Communities Friends of Acadia Journal Fall/Winter 2016 1 President’s Message FOA AT 30 hen a handful of volunteers And the impact of this work extends at Acadia National Park and beyond Acadia: this fall I attended a Wforward-looking park staff to- conference at the Grand Canyon, where gether founded Friends of Acadia in 1986, I heard how several other friends groups their goal was to provide more opportuni- from around the country are modeling ties for citizens to give back to this beloved their efforts after FOA’s best practices place that gave them so much. Many were and historic successes. Closer to home, avid hikers willing to help with trail up- community members in northern Maine keep. Others were concerned about dwin- have already reached out to FOA for tips dling park funding coming from Washing- as they contemplate a friends group for the ton. Those living in the surrounding towns newly-established Katahdin Woods and shared a desire to help a large federal agen- Waters National Monument. cy better understand and work with our As the brilliant fall colors seemed to small Maine communities. hang on longer than ever at Acadia this These visionaries may or may not year, I enjoyed a late-October morning on have predicted the challenges and the Precipice Trail. The young peregrine opportunities facing Acadia at the dawn FOA falcons had fledged, and the re-opened trail of its second century—such as climate featured a few new rungs and hand-holds change, transportation planning, cruise and partners whom we hope will remain made possible by a generous FOA donor.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mystery of the Banded Killifish Fundulus Diaphanus Population Explosion: Where Did They All Come From?
    The Mystery of the Banded KillifishFundulus ( diaphanus) Population Explosion: Where Did They All Come from? Philip W. Willink, Jeremy S. Tiemann, Joshua L. Sherwood, Eric R. Larson, Abe Otten, Brian Zimmerman 3 American Currents Vol. 44, No. 4 THE MYSTERY OF THE BANDED KILLIFISH FUNDULUS DIAPHANUS POPULATION EXPLOSION: WHERE DID THEY ALL COME FROM? Philip W. Willink, Jeremy S. Tiemann, Joshua L. Sherwood, La Grange Park, IL Illinois Natural History Survey Illinois Natural History Survey Eric R. Larson, Abe Otten, Brian Zimmerman University of Illinois at Scott Community The Ohio State University Urbana-Champaign College Stream and River Ecology Lab Banded Killifish Fundulus diaphanus are no strangers to NAN- and have not been seen since, they were only known from a hand- FAers. Over the past several years, there have been multiple arti- ful of inland lakes in the far northeastern corner the state (Fig. 1). cles in American Currents covering their distribution (Hatch 2015; Even there, population numbers were low. Schmidt 2016a, 2018; Olson and Schmidt 2018; Li 2019), stocking So it was with great excitement that in the early 2000s Illinois to restore populations (Bland 2013; Schmidt 2014), and appear- ichthyologists started to find more and more presumed Western ance in a hatchery (Schmidt 2016b). Their range extends from the Banded Killifish in Lake Michigan (Willink et al. 2018). They Canadian Maritime provinces south along the Atlantic coast to were even showing up in downtown Chicago (Willink 2011). It the Carolinas, as well as westward through the Great Lakes region was hoped that this range expansion was evidence of an uncom- to the upper Mississippi watershed.
    [Show full text]
  • Acadia Activities Brochure
    Acadia Mt Desert Island, Maine Samuel E. Lux June 2019 edition planyourvisit/conditions.htm or by searching http://www.mdislander.- Hiking com, the local newspaper, for “precipice trail”. Neither is reliably The hiking in Acadia is, to my mind, up-to-date. The Harbor Walk in Bar the best in America. The approxi- Harbor and the walk along Otter mately 135 miles of trails are beauti- Point (Ocean trail) are both very fully marked and maintained. Many beautiful and very easy. Another have granite steps, or iron ladders or short, easy hike is to Beech Cliffs railings to help negotiate difficult/ from the top of Beech mountain. dangerous spots. They range from road. Only 0.3 mile and great views. flat to straight up. And you get the Kids also love the short walk to the Fig. 1. View of Sand Beach from best views with the least work of any rocky coast and myriad tide pools on part way up Beehive trail trail system anywhere. Beehive to the Wonderland trail. Couch potatoes Gorham mountain and Cadillac can drive to the top of Cadillac Cliffs, then walk back along shore mountain, the highest point in the (Ocean trail), Precipice (appropriately park. Views are worth it. named), and the Jordan Cliffs trail Excellent Circle Hikes followed by a walk back down South Ridge of Penobscot mountain trail are Beehive-Gorham-Ocean Drive my favorites, but there are dozens of Park at Sand Beach on the Park Loop great ones, at least 50 overall. For Road. Do this hike early in the day kids over 6 to 7 years the Beehive trail before the crowds arrive.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2012
    Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2012 Edited by Laura E. Gadd, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program Office of Conservation, Planning, and Community Affairs N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources 1601 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1601 Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2012 Edited by Laura E. Gadd, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program Office of Conservation, Planning, and Community Affairs N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources 1601 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1601 www.ncnhp.org NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM LIST OF THE RARE PLANTS OF NORTH CAROLINA 2012 Edition Edited by Laura E. Gadd, Botanist and John Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Office of Conservation, Planning, and Community Affairs Department of Environment and Natural Resources, 1601 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1601 www.ncnhp.org Table of Contents LIST FORMAT ......................................................................................................................................................................... 3 NORTH CAROLINA RARE PLANT LIST ......................................................................................................................... 10 NORTH CAROLINA PLANT WATCH LIST ..................................................................................................................... 71 Watch Category
    [Show full text]
  • Sediment Properties of Pantai Punggur
    SEDIMENT PROPERTIES OF PANTAI PUNGGUR 1ZARINA MD ALI, 2LAI WAI TAN, 3SYED MOHD MOHARJIR SYED TAHAR, 4AYU FADILLAH ABD HAKIMD Department of Water and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, 86400 Batu Pahat, Johor E-mail: [email protected] Abstract- Pantai Punggur or Punggur beach is one of the critically eroded locations identified along the south-west coast of Peninsular Malaysia. Before erosion mitigation is proposed, initial investigations including the determination of sediment properties along the shore should be made. In this study, pantai Punggur has been found to be a very mild-sloped mud flat with slope between 1:400 and 1:1000. From the soil samples collected along the shoreline in 2012 and 2013, Punggur beach is classified as having marine-clay sand with 75.83% to 122.63% moisture content and 2.2% to 11.2% organic content. Along the landward limit of the nearshore zone, the sediment consisted of well-graded sand while along the seaward limit, the sediment consisted of marine clay. Specific gravity for the sand is found to be between 1.1 and 1.85, while for the marine clay is 2.62. Based on Stokes’ equation, the settling velocities obtained for sand samples are between 0.020 m/s and 1.197 m/s, and for clay samples are between 7.15 107 m/s to 3.23 105 m/s. Keywords- Erosion; marine clay sand; Punggur; sediment properties I. INTRODUCTION Tampok (Ahmad, 2009). Malaysia coastline faces problems of over-fishing, Due to the wind shield by the Sumatera, the west coast pollution, coral reef destruction, deforestation, and of Peninsular Malaysia is characterized by mud flat erosion, among others.
    [Show full text]
  • Esox Lucius) Ecological Risk Screening Summary
    Northern Pike (Esox lucius) Ecological Risk Screening Summary U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, February 2019 Web Version, 8/26/2019 Photo: Ryan Hagerty/USFWS. Public Domain – Government Work. Available: https://digitalmedia.fws.gov/digital/collection/natdiglib/id/26990/rec/22. (February 1, 2019). 1 Native Range and Status in the United States Native Range From Froese and Pauly (2019a): “Circumpolar in fresh water. North America: Atlantic, Arctic, Pacific, Great Lakes, and Mississippi River basins from Labrador to Alaska and south to Pennsylvania and Nebraska, USA [Page and Burr 2011]. Eurasia: Caspian, Black, Baltic, White, Barents, Arctic, North and Aral Seas and Atlantic basins, southwest to Adour drainage; Mediterranean basin in Rhône drainage and northern Italy. Widely distributed in central Asia and Siberia easward [sic] to Anadyr drainage (Bering Sea basin). Historically absent from Iberian Peninsula, Mediterranean France, central Italy, southern and western Greece, eastern Adriatic basin, Iceland, western Norway and northern Scotland.” Froese and Pauly (2019a) list Esox lucius as native in Armenia, Azerbaijan, China, Georgia, Iran, Kazakhstan, Mongolia, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Albania, Austria, Belgium, Bosnia Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Macedonia, Moldova, Monaco, 1 Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, Ukraine, Canada, and the United States (including Alaska). From Froese and Pauly (2019a): “Occurs in Erqishi river and Ulungur lake [in China].” “Known from the Selenge drainage [in Mongolia] [Kottelat 2006].” “[In Turkey:] Known from the European Black Sea watersheds, Anatolian Black Sea watersheds, Central and Western Anatolian lake watersheds, and Gulf watersheds (Firat Nehri, Dicle Nehri).
    [Show full text]