DOCSLIB.ORG

Maps of Suitable Land for Organic Farming in Kyustendil District

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Maps of Suitable Land for Organic Farming in Kyustendil District Orchards - Group Vineyards - Group 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 µ 5 µ 5 Treclyano Kustendil Bobov Dol Dupnitsa Sapareva banya Boboshevo Nevestino Kocherinovo Rila Altitude (meters) Value High : 2703 µ Low : 339 Vegetables - Group Pastures - Group 2 1 3 2 4 µ 3 µ 5 Suitable land for organic farming of Orchards in Rila municipality 4b 4a 4b 2a 3b 2c 3a 4a 4b 2b 7 4a 3b 6a 7 3b 2a 3b 2a 2a 2a 3a 5a 3b 2a 4a 4b 6a 6a 3b 3b 6b 2c 1 4a 5a 1 7 4a 4b 5a 5b 2c 3b 3a 4a 4b 3b Adaptation of the results of evaluations obtained by the suggested limiting method to ones that are expected by a good parametrical method. (By FAO, through C. Sys at al. 1991) Types / Suitability Evaluation Legend Group scores Very suitable lands. No limitations. Not more 95 100 Orchards - Group 1-S 1 than 4 limitations per level. 85 95 2 2-S2 Moderately suitable lands. 60 85 4 3-S3 Suitable lands with limitations. 40 60 Currently unsuitable but potentially suitable 4-N 25 40 5 1 lands. 01.25 2.5 5 7.5 10 5-N2 Currently and potentially unsuitable lands. 0 25 Kilometers µ Suitable land for organic farming of Pastures in Rila municipality 4b 4a 4b 2a 3b 2c 3a 4a 4b 2b 7 4a 3b 6a 7 3b 2a 3b 2a 2a 2a 3a 5a 3b 2a 4a 4b 6a 6a 3b 3b 6b 2c 1 4a 5a 1 7 4a 4b 5a 5b 2c 3b 3a 4a 4b 3b Adaptation of the results of evaluations obtained by the suggested limiting method to ones that are expected by a good parametrical method. (By FAO, through C. Sys at al. 1991) Types / Suitability Evaluation Legend Group scores Very suitable lands. No limitations. Not more 95 100 Pastures - Group 1-S 1 than 4 limitations per level. 85 95 1 2-S2 Moderately suitable lands. 60 85 2 3-S3 Suitable lands with limitations. 40 60 Currently unsuitable but potentially suitable 4-N 25 40 3 1 lands. 01.25 2.5 5 7.5 10 5-N2 Currently and potentially unsuitable lands. 0 25 Kilometers µ Suitable land for organic farming of Vegetables in Rila municipality 4b 4a 4b 2a 3b 2c 3a 4a 4b 2b 7 4a 3b 6a 7 3b 2a 3b 2a 2a 2a 3a 5a 3b 2a 4a 4b 6a 6a 3b 3b 6b 2c 1 4a 5a 1 7 4a 4b 5a 5b 2c 3b 3a 4a 4b 3b Adaptation of the results of evaluations obtained by the suggested limiting method to ones that are expected by a good parametrical method. (By FAO, through C. Sys at al. 1991) Types / Suitability Evaluation Legend Group scores Very suitable lands. No limitations. Not more 95 100 Vegetable - Group 1-S 1 than 4 limitations per level. 85 95 2 2-S2 Moderately suitable lands. 60 85 4 3-S3 Suitable lands with limitations. 40 60 Currently unsuitable but potentially suitable 4-N 25 40 5 1 lands. 01.25 2.5 5 7.5 10 5-N2 Currently and potentially unsuitable lands. 0 25 Kilometers µ Suitable land for organic farming of Vineyards in Rila municipality 4b 4a 4b 2a 3b 2c 3a 4a 4b 2b 7 4a 3b 6a 7 3b 2a 3b 2a 2a 2a 3a 5a 3b 2a 4a 4b 6a 6a 3b 3b 6b 2c 1 4a 5a 1 7 4a 4b 5a 5b 2c 3b 3a 4a 4b 3b Adaptation of the results of evaluations obtained by the suggested limiting method to ones that are expected by a good parametrical method. (By FAO, through C. Sys at al. 1991) Types / Suitability Evaluation Group scores Very suitable lands. No limitations. Not more 95 100 Legend 1-S 1 than 4 limitations per level. 85 95 Vineyards - Group 2-S2 Moderately suitable lands. 60 85 2 3-S3 Suitable lands with limitations. 40 60 Currently unsuitable but potentially suitable 4-N 25 40 5 1 lands. 01.25 2.5 5 7.5 10 5-N2 Currently and potentially unsuitable lands. 0 25 Kilometers µ Suitable land for organic farming of Orchards in Sapareva banya municipality 3c 6b 1b 2b 3c 7b 1a 6a 4c 3c 1a 7a 2b 3a 6a 4a 3c 2a 3b 2b Adaptation of the results of evaluations obtained 3c by the suggested limiting method to ones that are 5c 4c expected by a good parametrical method. 4b (By FAO, through C. Sys at al. 1991) Legend 4b Types / Suitability Evaluation Orchards - Group Group scores 5b 4c Very suitable lands. No limitations. Not more 95 100 2 1-S 5a 1 than 4 limitations per level. 5d 85 95 3 2-S Moderately suitable lands. 5b 2 60 85 3-S Suitable lands with limitations. 40 60 4 3 Currently unsuitable but potentially suitable 4-N1 25 40 5 lands. 5-N2 Currently and potentially unsuitable lands. 0 25 01 2 4 6 8 Kilometers µ Suitable land for organic farming of Pastures in Sapareva banya municipality 3c 6b 1b 2b 3c 7b 1a 6a 4c 3c 1a 7a 2b 3a 6a 4a 3c 2a 3b 2b Adaptation of the results of evaluations obtained 3c by the suggested limiting method to ones that are 5c 4c expected by a good parametrical method. 4b (By FAO, through C. Sys at al. 1991) 4b Types / Suitability Evaluation Group scores 5b 4c Very suitable lands. No limitations. Not more 95 100 Legend 1-S 5a 1 than 4 limitations per level. 5d 85 95 2-S Moderately suitable lands. Pastures - Group 5b 2 60 85 3-S Suitable lands with limitations. 40 60 1 3 Currently unsuitable but potentially suitable 4-N1 25 40 2 lands. 5-N2 Currently and potentially unsuitable lands. 0 25 01 2 4 6 8 Kilometers µ Suitable land for organic farming of Vegetables in Sapareva banya municipality 3c 6b 1b 2b 3c 7b 1a 6a 4c 3c 1a 7a 2b 3a 6a 4a 3c 2a 3b 2b Adaptation of the results of evaluations obtained 3c by the suggested limiting method to ones that are 5c 4c expected by a good parametrical method. 4b (By FAO, through C. Sys at al. 1991) Legend 4b Types / Suitability Evaluation Vegetable - Group Group scores 5b 4c Very suitable lands. No limitations. Not more 95 100 2 1-S 5a 1 than 4 limitations per level. 5d 85 95 3 2-S Moderately suitable lands. 5b 2 60 85 3-S Suitable lands with limitations. 40 60 4 3 Currently unsuitable but potentially suitable 4-N1 25 40 5 lands. 5-N2 Currently and potentially unsuitable lands. 0 25 01 2 4 6 8 Kilometers µ Suitable land for organic farming of Vineyards in Sapareva banya municipality 3c 6b 1b 2b 3c 7b 1a 6a 4c 3c 1a 7a 2b 3a 6a 4a 3c 2a 3b 2b Adaptation of the results of evaluations obtained 3c by the suggested limiting method to ones that are 5c 4c expected by a good parametrical method. 4b (By FAO, through C. Sys at al. 1991) Legend 4b Types / Suitability Evaluation Vineyards - Group Group scores 5b 4c Very suitable lands. No limitations. Not more 95 100 2 1-S 5a 1 than 4 limitations per level. 5d 85 95 3 2-S Moderately suitable lands. 5b 2 60 85 3-S Suitable lands with limitations. 40 60 4 3 Currently unsuitable but potentially suitable 4-N1 25 40 5 lands. 5-N2 Currently and potentially unsuitable lands. 0 25 01 2 4 6 8 Kilometers µ Suitable land for organic farming of Orchards in Dupnitsa municipality 6c 1c 6c 1a 9b 6b 6a 2b 2b 9a 2a 3c 6a 6b 1b 8 1a 6a6a 1a 6a 6a 9a 6a 1a 1a 4b 3a 7a 3a 3b 3b 5b 5b 7b 4b 5b 5b Adaptation of the results of evaluations obtained 7b 4a 5a by the suggested limiting method to ones that are 5b expected by a good parametrical method. (By FAO, through C. Sys at al. 1991) Types / Suitability Evaluation Legend Group scores Very suitable lands. No limitations. Not more 95 100 Orchards - Group 1-S 1 than 4 limitations per level. 85 95 2 2-S2 Moderately suitable lands. 60 85 3 3-S3 Suitable lands with limitations. 40 60 Currently unsuitable but potentially suitable 4-N 25 40 4 1 lands. 01.5 3 6 9 12 5-N2 Currently and potentially unsuitable lands. 0 25 Kilometers 5 µ Suitable land for organic farming of Pastures in Dupnitsa municipality 6c 1c 6c 1a 9b 6b 6a 2b 2b 9a 2a 3c 6a 6b 1b 8 1a 6a6a 1a 6a 6a 9a 6a 1a 1a 4b 3a 7a 3a 3b 3b 5b 5b 7b 4b 5b 5b Adaptation of the results of evaluations obtained 7b 4a 5a by the suggested limiting method to ones that are 5b expected by a good parametrical method. (By FAO, through C. Sys at al. 1991) Types / Suitability Evaluation Group scores Very suitable lands. No limitations. Not more 95 100 Legend 1-S 1 than 4 limitations per level. 85 95 Pastures - Group 2-S2 Moderately suitable lands. 60 85 1 3-S3 Suitable lands with limitations. 40 60 Currently unsuitable but potentially suitable 4-N 25 40 2 1 lands. 01.5 3 6 9 12 5-N2 Currently and potentially unsuitable lands. 0 25 Kilometers 3 µ Suitable land for organic farming of Vegetables in Dupnitsa municipality 6c 1c 6c 1a 9b 6b 6a 2b 2b 9a 2a 3c 6a 6b 1b 8 1a 6a6a 1a 6a 6a 9a 6a 1a 1a 4b 3a 7a 3a 3b 3b 5b 5b 7b 4b 5b 5b Adaptation of the results of evaluations obtained 7b 4a 5a by the suggested limiting method to ones that are 5b expected by a good parametrical method.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Suffocating Grip of Coal
    The Suffocating Grip Of Coal Report on the effects of coal burning on human health november 2013 Contents 1. Summary and key messages 1 2. Coal-fired electricity generation: (no) prospects 3 3. Coal-fired power plants in Bulgaria 5 3.1 Thermal power plants in Bulgaria: overview 6 3.2 Energy production and energy consumption 8 in Bulgaria: plans and reality 4. Air pollution from coal burning in Bulgaria: 12 myths and reality 5. Coal burning: effects on human health 17 5.1 TPP in Bulgaria: impacts on human health 19 5.2 TPP in the Maritsa basin: impacts on human health 23 6. Alternatives 27 7. Conclusions and recommendations 29 #1 Summary and key messages Air pollution is a key cause of a number of diseases in Europe and Bulgaria. This Key messages premature deaths – four times report of Greenpeace Bulgaria on the the death toll of road accidents impact of coal burning on human health Air pollution with sulphur dioxide in Bulgaria in the same year demonstrates the close link between and particulate matter (PM) per human health and the energy policy and generated kilowatt-hour (kWh) of strategy of Bulgaria. electricity in thermal power plants (TPP) in Bulgaria is one of the Reliance on coal and new nuclear highest in Europe. capacities on the part of the Bulgarian These facts, as well as the government is ill-advised from both Most TPP in Bulgaria have installed filters for capturing of current economic crisis, economicly and environmentally sulphur dioxide and nitrogen require a comprehensive wise. Most importantly, it implies an oxides.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Research Division Country Profile: Bulgaria, October 2006
    Library of Congress – Federal Research Division Country Profile: Bulgaria, October 2006 COUNTRY PROFILE: BULGARIA October 2006 COUNTRY Formal Name: Republic of Bulgaria (Republika Bŭlgariya). Short Form: Bulgaria. Term for Citizens(s): Bulgarian(s). Capital: Sofia. Click to Enlarge Image Other Major Cities (in order of population): Plovdiv, Varna, Burgas, Ruse, Stara Zagora, Pleven, and Sliven. Independence: Bulgaria recognizes its independence day as September 22, 1908, when the Kingdom of Bulgaria declared its independence from the Ottoman Empire. Public Holidays: Bulgaria celebrates the following national holidays: New Year’s (January 1); National Day (March 3); Orthodox Easter (variable date in April or early May); Labor Day (May 1); St. George’s Day or Army Day (May 6); Education Day (May 24); Unification Day (September 6); Independence Day (September 22); Leaders of the Bulgarian Revival Day (November 1); and Christmas (December 24–26). Flag: The flag of Bulgaria has three equal horizontal stripes of white (top), green, and red. Click to Enlarge Image HISTORICAL BACKGROUND Early Settlement and Empire: According to archaeologists, present-day Bulgaria first attracted human settlement as early as the Neolithic Age, about 5000 B.C. The first known civilization in the region was that of the Thracians, whose culture reached a peak in the sixth century B.C. Because of disunity, in the ensuing centuries Thracian territory was occupied successively by the Greeks, Persians, Macedonians, and Romans. A Thracian kingdom still existed under the Roman Empire until the first century A.D., when Thrace was incorporated into the empire, and Serditsa was established as a trading center on the site of the modern Bulgarian capital, Sofia.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex REPORT for 2019 UNDER the “HEALTH CARE” PRIORITY of the NATIONAL ROMA INTEGRATION STRATEGY of the REPUBLIC of BULGAR
    Annex REPORT FOR 2019 UNDER THE “HEALTH CARE” PRIORITY of the NATIONAL ROMA INTEGRATION STRATEGY OF THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA 2012 - 2020 Operational objective: A national monitoring progress report has been prepared for implementation of Measure 1.1.2. “Performing obstetric and gynaecological examinations with mobile offices in settlements with compact Roma population”. During the period 01.07—20.11.2019, a total of 2,261 prophylactic medical examinations were carried out with the four mobile gynaecological offices to uninsured persons of Roma origin and to persons with difficult access to medical facilities, as 951 women were diagnosed with diseases. The implementation of the activity for each Regional Health Inspectorate is in accordance with an order of the Minister of Health to carry out not less than 500 examinations with each mobile gynaecological office. Financial resources of BGN 12,500 were allocated for each mobile unit, totalling BGN 50,000 for the four units. During the reporting period, the mobile gynecological offices were divided into four areas: Varna (the city of Varna, the village of Kamenar, the town of Ignatievo, the village of Staro Oryahovo, the village of Sindel, the village of Dubravino, the town of Provadia, the town of Devnya, the town of Suvorovo, the village of Chernevo, the town of Valchi Dol); Silistra (Tutrakan Municipality– the town of Tutrakan, the village of Tsar Samuel, the village of Nova Cherna, the village of Staro Selo, the village of Belitsa, the village of Preslavtsi, the village of Tarnovtsi,
    [Show full text]
  • Bulgaria in the European Community Scheme for Greenhouse Gas Emission Allowance Trading
    NATIONAL ALLOCATION PLAN FOR PARTICIPATION OF BULGARIA IN THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY SCHEME FOR GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSION ALLOWANCE TRADING For the period 2008 - 2012 Sofia, 2007. TABLE OF CONTENTS: DEFINITION...................................................................................ERROR! BOOKMARK NOT DEFINED. ABBREVIATIONS .........................................................................ERROR! BOOKMARK NOT DEFINED. INTRODUCTION...........................................................................ERROR! BOOKMARK NOT DEFINED. CATEGORIES OF ACTIVITIES COVERED BY THE DIRECTIVE. CRITERIA FOR NATIONAL ALLOCATION PLANS...................................................................................................................................9 CATEGORIES OF ACTIVITIES REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 2(1), 3, 4, 14 (1), 28 AND 30 OF THE DIRECTIVE ..................................................................................................................... ERROR! BOOKMARK NOT DEFINED. CRITERIA FOR NATIONAL ALLOCATION PLANS REFERRED TO IN ARTICLES 9, 22 AND 30 OF THE DIRECTIVE 2003/87/ЕС ............................................................................. ERROR! BOOKMARK NOT DEFINED. SUMMARY OF MAIN ALLOCATION PRINCIPLES.............ERROR! BOOKMARK NOT DEFINED. 1. TOTAL QUANTITY OF ALLOWANCES FOR ALLOCATION .......................................................12 1.1 BULGARIA’S COMMITMENTS UNDER THE KYOTO PROTOCOL......... ERROR! BOOKMARK NOT DEFINED. FEASIBILITY OF BULGARIA’S KP COMMITMENT. CALCULATION OF TOTAL EMISSIONS................ERROR!
    [Show full text]
  • Coal Mine Methane Country Profiles, Chapter 5, June 2015
    5 Bulgaria 5.1 Summary of Coal Industry 5.1.1 ROLE OF COAL IN BULGARIA Most of the coal consumed in Bulgaria is used for power production. A substantial portion of its thermal electric power plants, which produce more than one-half of the country’s total production of about 45 billion kilowatts, operate on domestic coal (Steblez, 2000). A reliable supply of higher- quality hard coal is, however, necessary for Bulgaria’s metallurgical industries, and such coal is obtained from as near as Ukraine and as far away as Australia (USDOE, 2004). Bulgaria’s annual coal production and consumption both remained relatively constant from 1990 through 2010, peaking in 2011, and the country is expected to remain a net coal importer (EIA, 2014). Bulgaria’s coal reserves include about 88.7 percent lignite, 10.9 percent brown coal, and 0.4 percent hard coal (Euracoal, 2014). Much of the household coal heating is with briquettes, especially in the vicinity of the state-owned briquette factory, Stara Zagora (see Figure 5-1). About 9 percent of Bulgaria’s coal production is used for making briquettes (USDOE, 2004). Table 5-1. Bulgaria’s Coal Reserves and Production Sub- Anthracite & bituminous & Total Global Rank Indicator Bituminous Lignite (million tonnes) (# and %) (million tonnes) (million tonnes) Estimated Proved Coal Reserves 2.0 2,364 2,366 20 (0.266%) (2011) Annual Coal Production (2012) 0.01 32.51 32.52 22 (0.41 %) Source: EIA (2014) CMM Country Profiles 41 BULGARIA Figure 5-1. Bulgaria’s Coal Fields Source: Euracoal (2014) 5.1.2 STAKEHOLDERS Table 5-2 summarizes key stakeholders in Bulgaria’s coal mine methane (CMM) industry.
    [Show full text]
  • FOREST DEVELOPMENT PROJECT NATIONAL CAPITAL OBLAST CENTERS DISTRICT CENTERS SELECTED CITIES and TOWNS Kyustendil Kula
    ° ° ° HUNGARY 20 25 30 BULGARIA MOLDOVA CROATIA ROMANIA FOREST DEVELOPMENT PROJECT 45° 45° 0 20 40 60 80 100 BOSNIA AND COMPONENT 3.5: WHERE PROJECT-FUNDED HERZEGOVINA SERBIA Danube KILOMETERS AND Black MONTENEGRO THINNING OPERATIONS WILL BE UNDERTAKEN Sofia Sea This map was produced by the BULGARIA Map Design Unit of The World Bank. Adriatic REGIONAL FORESTRY BOARDS Sea FYR The boundaries, colors, denominations MACEDONIA and any other information shown on ITALY ALBANIA this map do not imply, on the part of SELECTED CITIES AND TOWNS ° ° The World Bank Group, any judgment 40 40 DISTRICT CENTERS ROADS on the legal status of any territory, or GREECE TURKEY OBLAST CENTERS REGIONAL BOUNDARIES any endorsement or acceptance of NATIONAL CAPITAL INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARIES such boundaries. 20° 25° 30° 22° 23° 24° 25° 26° 27° 28° 29° To Bucharest ROMANIA Koshava Oltenita Silistra ° ° 44 Vidin R. Tutrakan 44 Calafat To Zajecar Kula Alfatar Giurgiu SILISTRA To Constanta Danube Lom Rouse Dulovo Corabia Kardam VIDIN Kozloduy R. Islaz Turnu Magurele Todorevo Orekhovo Danube Belogradchik Gigen Zimnicea DOBRICH MIKHAYLOVGRAD Nikopol Todor Ikonomov Belene Jantra RUSE RAZGRAD Svishtov Kaolinovo Dobrich Shabla Gabrovnitsa Iskar R. Razgrad Knezha Dolna Vit R. Samuil Kavarna Tyulenovo Montana Bela Slatina Mitropoliya PLEVEN Byala Sokolovo VRATSA Dolni Pleven R. SHUMEN Balchik Dubnik Levski Novi Pazar SERBIA AND Kamenets Popovo Chiren VELIKO Reka Berkovitsa Bukhovtsi Beli Izvor Cherven Bryag Shumen Devnya Vratsa TURNOVO Turgovishte Mezdra Osâm R. Gorna SHUMEN Provadiya Beloslav Va r n a MONTENEGRO Zlatna Lovech Oryakhovitsa TURGOVISHTE˘ Preslav To Pirot Panega Veliko Turnovo Lyaskovets Omurtag VARNA Stanintsi ° 43° 43 Sevlievo Zlataritsa Kalotina LOVECH Staro Oryakhovo Rosica R.
    [Show full text]
  • The Poverty Mapping Exercise in Bulgaria
    10412-05_Ch05.qxd 8/16/07 2:55 PM Page 90 5 The Poverty Mapping Exercise in Bulgaria BORYANA GOTCHEVA ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS BIHS Bulgaria Integrated Household Survey EU European Union Eurostat Statistical Office of the European Communities IDF Institutional Development Fund Lev lev (plural leva), the Bulgarian currency MLSP Ministry of Labor and Social Policy MTHS multitopic household survey NSI National Statistical Institute OECD Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development SIF Social Investment Fund ulgaria is a well-performing middle-income country that joined the European BUnion (EU) on January 1, 2007. After a difficult transition from central planning that culminated in a severe crisis in 1996–97, the country has made impressive progress toward long-term stability and sustained growth. Macroeconomic stability has been reestablished and maintained through prudent fiscal policies and strict discipline in income policy anchored on the currency board arrangement adopted in 1997. A broad structural reform agenda has contributed to solid economic performance. Continued growth since the 1996–97 crisis has led to poverty reduction and improvements in living standards generally, although deep pockets of poverty persist. Per capita income increased from US$1,200 in 1997 to US$2,740 in 2004 (gross national income, Atlas method). Nonetheless, per capita gross domestic product, at the purchasing power stan- dard in 2003, was only 30 percent of the EU average, so that continued growth and the 90 10412-05_Ch05.qxd 8/16/07 2:55 PM Page 91 THE POVERTY MAPPING EXERCISE IN BULGARIA 91 convergence of living conditions toward EU standards remain a core policy goal.
    [Show full text]
  • INT CAT CSS BGR 29219 E.Pdf
    ALTERNATIVE REPORT ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE UN CONVENTION AGAINST TORTURE AND OTHER CRUEL, INHUMAN OR DEGRADING TREATMENT OR PUNISHMENT (CONVENTION AGAINST TORTURE) BULGARIA TORTURE AND MISTREATMENT 1 The Bulgarian Helsinki Committee (BHC) was established on 14 July 1992 as an independent non-governmental organisation for the protection of human rights. The objectives of the committee are to promote respect for the human rights of every individual, to stimulate legislative reform to bring Bulgarian legislation in line with international human rights standards, to trigger public debate on human rights issues, to carry out advocacy for the protection of human rights, and to popularise and make widely available human rights instruments. The backbone of the committee's activities is systematic monitoring of the human rights situation in the country. It gives us information on the state and development of human rights domestically and supplies our legal defence programme with cases of human rights violations for litigation before the domestic and international courts. In addition, the committee reports on human rights violations with a special emphasis on the rights of ethnic and religious minorities, refugees and asylum-seekers, rights of the child, protection from torture and ill-treatment, freedom of expression and association, problems of the criminal justice system. BHC offers free legal assistance to victims of human rights abuses. The committee also works in the sphere of human rights education, organises conferences, workshops, public actions and other forms of public activities aimed at bringing the concept of human rights to the attention of the general public. Contact information: BULGARIAN HELSINKI COMMITTEE 7 Varbitsa Street, Sofia 1504, Bulgaria Tel: +3592 943 4876 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.bghelsinki.org Contact person regarding the report: Slavka Kukova, senior researcher, e-mail: [email protected] Sofia, July 2017 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Bulgarian Criminal Code does not criminalize torture.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of the Annual Report of the Work of the Ombudsman
    Summary of the Annual Report of the Work of 2019 the Ombudsman “I promise that the Ombudsman will be where the citizens’ problems are and I will not spare an effort to defend the principle that all human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights!” Assoc.Prof. Diana Kovacheva, Ombudsman of the Republic of Bulgaria March 2020 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 3 Actions and results ......................................................................................................................... 6 Key events and initiatives in 2019 .................................................................................................. 8 2019 in numbers .......................................................................................................................... 15 Chapter One. The Ombudsman Protecting the Citizens’ Rights .................................................... 21 1. Reception desk of the Ombudsman ......................................................................................... 22 2. Consumer rights ....................................................................................................................... 24 3. Social rights .............................................................................................................................. 30 4. Rights of persons with disabilities ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Verkaufspunkte Vignette Bulgarien
    Verkaufspunkte Vignette Bulgarien AKZ Nr. Name Straße PLZ + Ort 16 15 255 PETROL-Station Lomsko Chaussee 226 1000 Sofia 16 15 256 PETROL-Station Pencho Slaveykov Street, Serdika Residential Area 1000 Sofia 16 15 258 PETROL-Station Konstantin Velichkov Boulevard 1000 Sofia 16 15 259 PETROL-Station Lyulin Residential Area 5 1000 Sofia 16 15 260 PETROL-Station Exit to Dragoman 1000 Sofia 16 15 261 PETROL-Station Iliensko Chaussee 1000 Sofia 16 15 262 PETROL-Station Bozhur Motel, Ringroad 1000 Sofia 16 15 263 PETROL-Station Iztok Motel, Ringroad 1000 Sofia 16 15 264 PETROL-Station Yordan Iliev Street 3, Maldost Residential Area 1000 Sofia 16 15 265 PETROL-Station Tzar Boris III Boulevard 17, Pavlovo District 1000 Sofia 16 15 268 PETROL-Station Nikola Vaptsarov Boulevard 4 1000 Sofia 16 15 269 PETROL-Station Dragomansko Chaussee, Milevo Hanche 1000 Sofia 16 15 270 PETROL-Station Gorublyane District 1000 Sofia 16 15 271 PETROL-Station Botevgradsko Chaussee, Ringroad, Vrazhdebna Distri 1000 Sofia 16 15 272 PETROL-Station Dianabad District, Vasil Kalchev District 1000 Sofia 16 15 273 PETROL-Station 2 Mladost Residential Area 1000 Sofia 16 15 274 PETROL-Station Bulina livada Street, Gevgeliiski District 1000 Sofia 16 15 275 PETROL-Station M. Kusevich Street 1, Kransna Polyana District 1000 Sofia 16 15 276 PETROL-Station Obelya Residential Area 1000 Sofia 16 15 277 PETROL-Station 1st Balgarska Street, Orlandovtsi District 1000 Sofia 16 15 278 PETROL-Station Lomsko Chaussee, Ringroad 1000 Sofia 16 15 279 PETROL-Station Asen Yordanov Street, Junction
    [Show full text]
  • Kyustendil District
    Kyustendil District Treklyano > Population (2015) 126,992 > Area (sq. km) 3,051.5 KYUSTENDIL Bobov dol SAPAREVA BANYA > Number of settlements 183 NEVESTINO DUPNITSA > Share of urban population (%) 69.1 BOBOSHEVO RILA KOCHERINOVO Overview lthough living conditions and social inclusion have deteriorate. The educational system has been successful in gradually been improving, salaries in the district have enrolling a great part of those subject to compulsory edu- Astayed low, while a considerable part of total households’ cation, though quality of education has been relatively low. incomes was generated by pensions. In 2015, unemploy- There has been a certain shortage of specialist doctors in ment fell and employment rose for the first time after the the district but the number of hospital beds is sufficient and crisis; both indicators, however, were still below the national the share of health-insured persons is high. Kyustendil has average levels. Kyustendil is among the districts which have received the second lowest rating after Sofia (capital city) for attracted least FDI so far and whose municipalities have uti- security and justice because of high crime rates, slow justice lized the least amount of EU funds. The rate of local taxes administration, and low crime clearance rate. In the “Envi- and fees was among the lowest in the country, yet, the ab- ronment” category, the district is characterized by good sence of transparency of local administrations has made the connectivity to public sewerage systems and wastewater district less attractive in comparison with others. treatment plants on one hand, and, by strongly polluted air, As a result of the unfavorable demographic tendencies, the on the other.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulgaria 2020 SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS
    Voluntary National Review SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS Bulgaria 2020 SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS 1. End poverty in all its forms everywhere 2. End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition, and promote sustainable agriculture 3. Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages 4. Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all 5. Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls 6. Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all 7. Ensure access to a!ordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all 8. Promote sustained, inclusive and sustainable economic growth, full and productive employment and decent work for all 9. Build resilient infrastructure, promote inclusive and sustainable industrialization, and foster innovation 10. Reduce inequality within and among countries 11. Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient, and sustainable 12. Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns 13. Take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts 14. Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources for sustainable development 15. Protect, restore and promote sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, sustainably manage forests, combat deserti"cation, and halt and reverse land degradation and halt biodiversity loss 16. Promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all and build e!ective, accountable and inclusive institutions
    [Show full text]