DOCSLIB.ORG

Supplementary Materials for Genetics and Material Culture Support

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

1 Supplementary Materials for 2 3 4 Genetics and material culture support repeated expansions into 5 Paleolithic Eurasia from a population hub out of Africa 6 7 8 9 Leonardo Vallini1, Giulia Marciani2, Serena Aneli1, Eugenio Bortolini2, 10 Stefano Benazzi2,3, Telmo Pievani1, Luca Pagani1,4 11 12 1 Department of Biology, University of Padova, Italy 13 2 Department of Cultural Heritage, University of Bologna, Italy 14 3 Department of Human Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, 15 Leipzig, Germany 16 4 Institute of Genomics, University of Tartu, Estonia 17 18 19 20 21 Supplementary Materials include: 22 23 - Supplementary Information 24 Section 1: Material Culture Page 2 25 Section 2: Genetic Dataset Page 11 26 Section 3: qpGraph analyses Page 14 27 Section 4: Paleomaps plotting Page 25 28 29 - Supplementary Figures S1 to S7 30 - Supplementary Tables S1 to S4 1 31 Supplementary Section 1: Material Culture 32 33 Many of the DNA samples discussed in this paper come from sites without stratigraphic association with diagnostic archaeological materials. To 34 overcome this issue, we use layers of sites located in proximity of and coeval to DNA sampling sites (Table S1). 35 Broad DNASample/Proxy Techno- chronological Sample/Site name Country Coordinates References complex range (cal kyr BP) DNASample Vindija M Croatia 46.29 N, 16.07 E ~50 * Leder 2014, Pre-expansion sites in the Levant Ksar_Akil_XXII-XXV IUP Lebanon 33.91 N, 35.64 E ~45-43 2016 Kuhn 2004; Pre-expansion sites in the Levant Üçagizli_F,Fa,Fb-c,G,H,H1-3,I IUP Turkey 35.98 N, 35.96 E ~45-40 Kuhn et al 2009 Boeda, E., Pre-expansion sites in the Levant Umel’Tlel IUP Syria 35.27 N, 38.89 E ~40 Bonilauri, S., 2006 2 Marks, A., Pre-expansion sites in the Levant Boker_Tachtit_layer_4 IUP Israel 30.84 N, 34.78 E ~45-40 Kaufman, D., 1983 DNASample UstIshim IUP* Russia 57.7 N, 71.1 E ~44 * Zwyns et al. Ust_Ishim Kara_Bom_OH_5_OH6 IUP Russia 50.72 N, 85.57 E >45 2012 Derevianko et al. 2013; Ust_Ishim Tolbor-4_layer_4-5-6 IUP Mongolia 49.29 N, 102.97 E ~45-35 Zwyns et al. 2019 Zwyns et al. Ust_Ishim Tolbor-16_layer_6 IUP Mongolia 49.23 N, 102.92 E ~45-40 2019 Zwyns, N., 51.44 N, 108.17 Ust_Ishim Kamenka_A IUP Russia ~45-40 Lbova, L. V, E 2019 DNASample Tianyuan IUP* China 39.66 N, 115.87 E ~40 * 3 Morgan et al Tianyuan Suindonggou_1 IUP China 38.38 N, 106.51 E <41 2014; Boeda et al. 2013 Li et al. 2019; Tianyuan Suindonggou_2 IUP China 38.38 N, 106.51 E <41 Peng et al.2020 DNASample Kostenki14 UP* Russia 51.23 N, 39.3 E ~37 * Sinitsyn and Kostenki14 Kostenki_12_Vokov UP Russia 51.39 N, 39.05 E <40 Hoffecker 2006 Hoffecker et Kostenki14 Kostenki_1 UP Russia 51.39 N, 39.05 E <40 al. 2016 DNASample Oase1 IUP-UP* Romania 45.12 N, 21.9 E ~38 * Tsanova Oase1 Bacho_Kiro_IUP_layer_11 IUP Bulgaria 42.95 N, 25.43 E >45 2009; Hublin et al. 2020 Czech ~41-35 Demidenko Oase1 Ořechov_IV_–_Kabáty IUP ~49.06 N, 16.31 E Republic (underestimate) 2020 4 Czech Richter et al. Oase1 Brno-Bohunice IUP ~49.12 N 16.37 E >45 Republic 2008 Anghelinu Oase1 Românesti-Dumbravita UP Romania 45.49 N, 22.19 E ~45-40 nita 2014; Sitlivy 2012 Anghelinu Oase1 Cosava UP Romania 45.51 N, 22.19 E ~45-40 nita 2014; Sitlivy 2014 Anghelinu Oase1 Tincova UP Romania 45.33 N, 22.9 E ~45-40 nita 2014; Sitlivy 2014 DNASample GoyetQ116-1 UP* Belgium 50.45 N, 5.01 E ~35 * Pirson et al. GoyetQ116-1 Maisières-Canal UP Belgium 50.48 N, 3.98 E <40 2012 Pirson et al. GoyetQ116-1 Spy_Ossiferous_Horizon_2 UP Belgium 50.48 N, 4.67 E <40 2012 5 Dobrovolskay a et al., 2012; DNASample Sunghir UP Russia 56.18 N, 40.50 E ~34 Trinkaus and Buzhilova, 2018 Pitulko et al. DNASample Yana UP Russia 70.72 N, 135.42 E ~31 2017 Khenzykheno va et al., DNASample Mal’ta (MA1) UP Russia 52.9 N, 103.5 E ~24 2019; Lbova, 2019 Tsanova DNASample Bacho_Kiro_IUP_layer_11 IUP Bulgaria 42.95 N, 25.43 E ~45 2009; Hublin et al. 2020 Czech DNASample Zlatý_Kůň S-IUP* 49.37 N, 16.72 E >45 * Republic Adams 2009; Zlatý Kůň Szeleta S Hungary 48.06 N, 20. 37 E ~45-40 Mester 2010 Czech Nejman et al., Zlatý Kůň Pod_Hradem S 49.37 N, 16.72 E ~45-40 Republic 2017 6 Nerudová Czech Zlatý Kůň Moravský_Krumlov_IV S 49.05 N, 16.41 E ~43-42 and Neruda, Republic 2017 Czech Tostevin Zlatý Kůň Stranska_Skala_III-IIIc IUP 49.11 N, 16.40 ~45-40 Republic 2003 Czech Richter et al. Zlatý Kůň Brno-Bohunice IUP ~49.12 N, 16.37 E >45 Republic 2008 36 37 Table S1. Cultural proxies for the ancient genomes analysed in the current work. M: Mousterian; S: Szeletian; IUP: Initial Upper Paleolithic; 38 UP: Upper Paleolithic; * indicates an attribution based on nearby coeval sites, which are specified in the subsequent rows. The coordinates of 39 the sites are taken from the reference articles or from the ROCEEH Out of Africa Database (ROAD) (http://www.roceeh.org). 7 40 1.1 IUP-UP definition 41 42 The definition of a techno-complex is based on the association among specific traits identified 43 and recorded in archaeological assemblages (e.g. typology and technology of stone tools). 44 Depending on the degree of magnification used to define a lithic assemblage, each techno- 45 complex could be seen as more/less similar to others. A broad definition of techno-complexes 46 could be compatible with models of population structure/movement, but this requires a high 47 degree of simplification and the loss of finer-grained differences across the examined sites. 48 On the other hand, a strict definition of a techno-complex could focus on the specificities of 49 each assemblage, hampering the possibility of gaining a more general perspective. Strict 50 definitions of lithic assemblages are in fact more compatible with scenarios of independent 51 development 1. In order to develop a model which considers a wide geographical and 52 chronological scale as the one under consideration in this work, it is crucial to describe the 53 techno-complexes choosing the key criteria that are both able to: i) maintain site-specificity; 54 and ii) identify the general tendencies. The question is how the data are collected and 55 compared and what meaning can be given to them concerning the question of the origin of 56 technical innovations. New technologies could be related to demic movements, cultural 57 diffusion/exchange without implying migration, or parallel convergence, i.e. the same 58 response to common adaptive challenges. Distinguishing homoplasy from homology requires 59 testing a hypothesis on the diversity of cultural traits and understanding it through a 60 comprehensive framework of technological evolution 2–6. 61 The terms Initial Upper Paleolithic, Early Upper Paleolithic and Upper Paleolithic, are 62 commonly used in the scientific literature with different meanings. They could have either a 63 chronological connotation or a technological one, or both of them. This paper refers to the 64 term Initial Upper Paleolithic (IUP) to indicate specific techno-complexes characterised by 65 volumetric blade productions and Levallois reduction sequence 5,7 (Table 2). The term Upper 66 Paleolithic (UP) is used to group the lithic industries characterised by the production of several 67 standardised blades and bladelets often together with ornaments and bone tools (Table 2). 68 The non-Mousterian and non-IUP technologies appeared during the Middle to Upper 69 Palaeolithic transition, comprising Uluzzian 8–13, Châtelperronian 14–16, Szeletian 17–19 and 70 Lincombian-Ranisian-Jermanowician (LRJ) 20–22. 71 8 Definition IUP UP Initial Upper Paleolithic Upper Paleolithic Lithic The IUP is a blade-based Blade and bladelet based industries technology production. usually used in composite tools. The reduction sequences use The broad category of UP includes a direct hard hammer percussion, great diversity of techno-complexes platform faceting, and mostly flat- which share the production of faced or semi-tournant cores. The standardised bladelets and blades with blades and some cores resemble a wide range of technical options (e.g. products of Levallois reduction unidirectional debitage by prismatic sequence 5,7,23. Sites in Siberia core, carinated core, burin-cores, and Mongolia are also among others) and percussion characterised by “burin-cores” for techniques 26–33. producing small blades and the exploitation of the narrow face cores 1,24,25. Emiran 34, Bokerian 35,36, Included Bohunician 37–39, Bachokirian 40. Protoaurignacian and Aurignacian techno- 31,32,41–45, Spitsynian 46,47, Ahmarian 48– complex 50, Early Upper Paleolithic 51,52, Gravettian 53–57. Other In some IUP assemblage is Habitual use (especially in the material documented the use of personal Gravettian) of portable art, graphic evidence ornament and formal bone tools representations, musical instruments, e.g. in Levant 23, Bulgaria, Siberia, and various bone tools 26,61,62. and Mongolia 7,58–60. Impressive burials sites e.g. Sunghir 63. Chronologically, the IUP is a long Chronology phenomenon comprised between The various stages of the UP make approximately 50 kya and 35 kya their appearances approximately 42 (calibrated). Its stratigraphic kya. Their stratigraphic position follows 9 position follows the Middle the IUP, Uluzzian, Szeletian, Paleolithic assemblages and is Chatelperroian, LRS. before UP assemblage 17–19s 5,7. 72 Table S2.
Recommended publications
  • An Early Modern Human from the Pes¸Tera Cu Oase, Romania

    An Early Modern Human from the Pes¸Tera Cu Oase, Romania

    An early modern human from the Pes¸tera cu Oase, Romania Erik Trinkaus*†, Oana Moldovan‡,S¸ tefan Milota§, Adrian Bıˆlga˘r¶, Laurent¸iu Sarcina§, Sheela Athreyaʈ, Shara E. Bailey**, Ricardo Rodrigo††, Gherase Mircea§, Thomas Higham‡‡, Christopher Bronk Ramsey‡‡, and Johannes van der Plicht§§ *Department of Anthropology, Campus Box 1114, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130; ‡Institutul de Speologie ‘‘Emil Racovit¸a˘ ,’’ Clinicilor 5, P.O. Box 58, 3400 Cluj, Romania; §Pro Acva Grup, Strada˘Surduc 1, 1900 Timis¸oara, Romania; ¶Strada˘Decebal 1, 1500 Drobeta Turnu Severin, Romania; ʈDepartment of Anthropology, Texas A&M University, College Station TX 77843; **Department of Anthropology, George Washington University, 2110 G Street, Washington, DC 20052; ††Centro Nacional da Arqueologia Na´utica e Subaqua´tica, Instituto Portugueˆs de Arqueologia, Avenida da India 136, 1300 Lisboa, Portugal; ‡‡Research Laboratory for Archaeology and the History of Art, University of Oxford, 6 Keble Road, Oxford OX1 3QJ, United Kingdom; and §§Centrum voor Isotopen Onderzoek, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands Contributed by Erik Trinkaus, August 8, 2003 The 2002 discovery of a robust modern human mandible in the Pes¸tera cu Oase, southwestern Romania, provides evidence of early modern humans in the lower Danubian Corridor. Directly accelerator mass spectrometry radiocarbon (14C)-dated to 34,000– 36,000 14C years B.P., the Oase 1 mandible is the oldest definite early modern human specimen in Europe and provides perspec- tives on the emergence and evolution of early modern humans in the northwestern Old World. The moderately long Oase 1 mandi- ble exhibits a prominent tuber symphyseos and overall proportions that place it close to earlier Upper Paleolithic European specimens.
  • Favorite Caching

    Favorite Caching

    24 Old Nessebar Tour GC2D1MG by kreo_74 16 Bulgaria Gold TB Hotel GC1GCED by IceFireForce 10 The Abandoned Sea Train Tunnel GC1JDRJ by Nord Wolf / Maintained by IceFireForce 9 Orthodox Mesembria GCXTJD by Islandia Geomatics 8 Top of the Balkans GCQXY4 by freddy 6 Bobby's cache GC1RH4D by bibobg 5 Emona GC1N8P7 by tsetsoradev, Mimi, Kami 5 Cherven Fortress GCZRJW by DarinD and Marcus in Kerry 4 Krushuna Waterfalls GC30R0K by anticuss 4 Krushuna Waterfalls #3 GC30P50 by anticuss & dkgsoft 4 The Balkan Mountains - Cape Emine GC2H2DW by ArnorsErbe 4 Ivanovo Rock Churches GC1YKTB by dkgsoft 4 One afternoon with science GC1QN8C by ludd42 4 Kaliakra Cape GC1MY36 by Tsetsoradev, Mimi, Kami 4 Pirin - Koncheto (The Horse) GC1G3K6 by Veni & Emil 4 Night in the Woods GC1CA2A by Stanislav 3 Creative #1 GC30JWH by anticuss 3 Suhi pech GC2TWH1 by bobi_4 3 The oldest tree in Bulgaria GC2EPGD by jen0andy 3 The Tramways of Sofia GC1FJYJ by IceFireForce 3 Yaila_artcache GC1F2M5 by xoxama 3 The Devetashka Cave GC1C0PY by IceFireForce & Alma 3 Bansko Cache GC17PNC by UMa & Umi 3 Cherni Vrah GCW17J by stm 2 Sveti Vlas - Stara Planina GC31J2T by Hedia 2 Krushuna Waterfalls #2 GC30P4H by anticuss & dkgsoft 2 Sunny beach sand dunes GC304KE by MatoBo 2 Ruse Mystery #5 - Mega Mall Ruse GC2ZAX by anticuss 2 Sv. Konstantin i Elena GC2MYPD by v44 2 Starosel Tracian Cult Complex GC2JDBG by mollov 2 Regina Maria GC2B1VA by amretired 2 Stoilovo waterfall GC28A66 by didorama , tedirama 2 Kukerite GC27GAZ by uzo with kamen_benz and sas 2 Reserve Ropotamo GC264HD by didorama
  • The Aurignacian Viewed from Africa

    The Aurignacian Viewed from Africa

    Aurignacian Genius: Art, Technology and Society of the First Modern Humans in Europe Proceedings of the International Symposium, April 08-10 2013, New York University THE AURIGNACIAN VIEWED FROM AFRICA Christian A. TRYON Introduction 20 The African archeological record of 43-28 ka as a comparison 21 A - The Aurignacian has no direct equivalent in Africa 21 B - Archaic hominins persist in Africa through much of the Late Pleistocene 24 C - High modification symbolic artifacts in Africa and Eurasia 24 Conclusions 26 Acknowledgements 26 References cited 27 To cite this article Tryon C. A. , 2015 - The Aurignacian Viewed from Africa, in White R., Bourrillon R. (eds.) with the collaboration of Bon F., Aurignacian Genius: Art, Technology and Society of the First Modern Humans in Europe, Proceedings of the International Symposium, April 08-10 2013, New York University, P@lethnology, 7, 19-33. http://www.palethnologie.org 19 P@lethnology | 2015 | 19-33 Aurignacian Genius: Art, Technology and Society of the First Modern Humans in Europe Proceedings of the International Symposium, April 08-10 2013, New York University THE AURIGNACIAN VIEWED FROM AFRICA Christian A. TRYON Abstract The Aurignacian technocomplex in Eurasia, dated to ~43-28 ka, has no direct archeological taxonomic equivalent in Africa during the same time interval, which may reflect differences in inter-group communication or differences in archeological definitions currently in use. Extinct hominin taxa are present in both Eurasia and Africa during this interval, but the African archeological record has played little role in discussions of the demographic expansion of Homo sapiens, unlike the Aurignacian. Sites in Eurasia and Africa by 42 ka show the earliest examples of personal ornaments that result from extensive modification of raw materials, a greater investment of time that may reflect increased their use in increasingly diverse and complex social networks.
  • On the Nature of Transitions: the Middle to Upper Palaeolithic and the Neolithic Revolution

    On the Nature of Transitions: the Middle to Upper Palaeolithic and the Neolithic Revolution

    On the Nature of Transitions: the Middle to Upper Palaeolithic and the Neolithic Revolution The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Bar-Yosef, Ofer. 1998. “On the Nature of Transitions: The Middle to Upper Palaeolithic and the Neolithic Revolution.” Cam. Arch. Jnl 8 (02) (October): 141. Published Version doi:10.1017/S0959774300000986 Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:12211496 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Cambridge Archaeological Journal 8:2 (1998), 141-63 On the Nature of Transitions: the Middle to Upper Palaeolithic and the Neolithic Revolution Ofer Bar-Yosef This article discusses two major revolutions in the history of humankind, namely, the Neolithic and the Middle to Upper Palaeolithic revolutions. The course of the first one is used as a general analogy to study the second, and the older one. This approach puts aside the issue of biological differences among the human fossils, and concentrates solely on the cultural and technological innovations. It also demonstrates that issues that are common- place to the study of the trajisition from foraging to cultivation and animal husbandry can be employed as an overarching model for the study of the transition from the Middle to the Upper Palaeolithic. The advantage of this approach is that it focuses on the core areas where each of these revolutions began, the ensuing dispersals and their geographic contexts.
  • Assessing Relationships Between Human Adaptive Responses and Ecology Via Eco-Cultural Niche Modeling William E

    Assessing Relationships Between Human Adaptive Responses and Ecology Via Eco-Cultural Niche Modeling William E

    Assessing relationships between human adaptive responses and ecology via eco-cultural niche modeling William E. Banks To cite this version: William E. Banks. Assessing relationships between human adaptive responses and ecology via eco- cultural niche modeling. Archaeology and Prehistory. Universite Bordeaux 1, 2013. hal-01840898 HAL Id: hal-01840898 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01840898 Submitted on 11 Nov 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Thèse d'Habilitation à Diriger des Recherches Université de Bordeaux 1 William E. BANKS UMR 5199 PACEA – De la Préhistoire à l'Actuel : Culture, Environnement et Anthropologie Assessing Relationships between Human Adaptive Responses and Ecology via Eco-Cultural Niche Modeling Soutenue le 14 novembre 2013 devant un jury composé de: Michel CRUCIFIX, Chargé de Cours à l'Université catholique de Louvain, Belgique Francesco D'ERRICO, Directeur de Recherche au CRNS, Talence Jacques JAUBERT, Professeur à l'Université de Bordeaux 1, Talence Rémy PETIT, Directeur de Recherche à l'INRA, Cestas Pierre SEPULCHRE, Chargé de Recherche au CNRS, Gif-sur-Yvette Jean-Denis VIGNE, Directeur de Recherche au CNRS, Paris Table of Contents Summary of Past Research Introduction ..................................................................................................................
  • The Discovery of an in Situ Neanderthal Remain in the Bawa Yawan Rockshelter, West- Central Zagros Mountains, Kermanshah

    The Discovery of an in Situ Neanderthal Remain in the Bawa Yawan Rockshelter, West- Central Zagros Mountains, Kermanshah

    PLOS ONE RESEARCH ARTICLE The discovery of an in situ Neanderthal remain in the Bawa Yawan Rockshelter, West- Central Zagros Mountains, Kermanshah 1,2,3 4,5 5,6 1,2 Saman Heydari-GuranID *, Stefano Benazzi , Sahra Talamo , Elham Ghasidian , Nemat Hariri2,7, Gregorio Oxilia4, Samran Asiabani3,8, Faramarz Azizi3, Rahmat Naderi3, 9 5,10 11 11 Reza SafaieradID , Jean-Jacques Hublin , Robert A. Foley , Marta M. Lahr 1 Stiftung Neanderthal Museum, Mettmann, Germany, 2 Department of Prehistoric Archaeology University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany, 3 DiyarMehr Centre for Palaeolithic Research, Kermanshah, Iran, 4 Department of Cultural Heritage, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy, 5 Department of Human Evolution, a1111111111 Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany, 6 Department of Chemistry G. a1111111111 Ciamician, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy, 7 Department of Archaeology, a1111111111 University of Mohaghegh Ardabili University, Ardabil, Iran, 8 Department of Architecture, Faculty of Art and a1111111111 Architecture, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran, 9 Department of Physical Geography, University of a1111111111 Tehran, Tehran, Iran, 10 Collège de France, 11 Place Marcelin Berthelot, Paris, France, 11 Leverhulme Centre for Human Evolutionary Studies, Department of Archaeology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom * [email protected] OPEN ACCESS Citation: Heydari-Guran S, Benazzi S, Talamo S, Abstract Ghasidian E, Hariri N, Oxilia G, et al. (2021) The discovery of an in situ Neanderthal remain in the Neanderthal extinction has been a matter of debate for many years. New discoveries, better Bawa Yawan Rockshelter, West-Central Zagros chronologies and genomic evidence have done much to clarify some of the issues.
  • Initial Upper Paleolithic Bladelet Production: Bladelets in Moravian Bohunician Produkce Čepelek V Iniciálním Mladém Paleolitu: Čepelky V Moravském Bohunicienu

    Initial Upper Paleolithic Bladelet Production: Bladelets in Moravian Bohunician Produkce Čepelek V Iniciálním Mladém Paleolitu: Čepelky V Moravském Bohunicienu

    Přehled výzkumů 61/1, 2020 X 21–29 Initial Upper Paleolithic bladelet production: Bladelets in Moravian Bohunician Produkce čepelek v iniciálním mladém paleolitu: čepelky v moravském bohunicienu – Yuri E. Demidenko*, Petr Škrdla, Tereza Rychtaříková – “What about the bladelets?” J. Tixier, 1987 (Williams, Bergman 2010, 117) Introduction KEYWORDS: The “bladelet issue” continues to be central to continuing discussions on the recognition of various Early Upper Palaeo- Initial Upper Palaeolithic – Bohunician – bladelets – Boker Tachtit – lithic (UP) techno-complexes and industry types in the Levant, Kara-Bom – Ořechov especially concerning the identifi cation of the so-called true Au- rignacian in the region (for the latest discussions, see Williams, Bergman 2010; Demidenko, Hauck 2017; Goring-Morris, ABSTRACT Belfer-Cohen 2018). The present paper touches on the bladelet issue for the chronologically earlier Initial UP techno-complexes Bladelets are a common Upper Palaeolithic technological category, often in Eurasia (Fig. 1) and particularly its Central European Bohu- described as a proxy for the Early Upper Palaeolithic. However, bladelet pro- nician “representative”. duction has already been documented within preceding Initial Upper Palae- Nowadays it can be surely said that the bladelet issue is in- olithic techno-complexes, e.g. at Boker Tachtit (Negev Desert, Israel) and deed one of the most discussed subjects in Eurasian Palaeolithic Kara-Bom (Altai Republic, Russian Federation). Only isolated bladelets have Archaeology (e.g. Le Brun-Ricalens et al. eds. 2005). From our been reported from the Central European Bohunician. However, a recently point of view, this is mostly due to the recognition of the impor- discovered and excavated site, Ořechov IV – Kabáty has yielded a large series tant role of bladelets in the hunting projectile weaponry of UP (over 1,000 items) of micro-blades and bladelets, documenting a higher de- humans.
  • Complex Projectile Technology and Homo Sapiens Dispersal Into Western Eurasia

    Complex Projectile Technology and Homo Sapiens Dispersal Into Western Eurasia

    Complex Projectile Technology and Homo sapiens Dispersal into Western Eurasia JOHN J. SHEA Department of Anthropology and Turkana Basin Institute, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794-4364, USA; [email protected] MATTHEW L. SISK Interdepartmental Doctoral Program in Anthropological Science, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794-4364, USA; [email protected] ABSTRACT This paper proposes that complex projectile weaponry was a key strategic innovation driving Late Pleistocene human dispersal into western Eurasia after 50 Ka. It argues that complex projectile weapons of the kind used by ethnographic hunter-gatherers, such as the bow and arrow, and spearthrower and dart, enabled Homo sapiens to overcome obstacles that constrained previous human dispersal from Africa to temperate western Eurasia. In the East Mediterranean Levant, the only permanent land bridge between Africa and Eurasia, stone and bone projectile armatures like those used in the complex weapon systems of recent humans appear abruptly ca 45–35 Ka in early Upper Paleolithic contexts associated with Homo sapiens fossils. Such artifacts are absent from Middle Paleolithic contexts associated with Homo sapiens and Neandertals. Hypotheses concerning the indigenous vs. exogenous origins of complex projectile weaponry in the Levant are reviewed. Current evidence favors the hypothesis that complex projectile technology developed as an aid to ecological niche broadening strategies among African popu- lations between 50–100 Ka. It most likely spread to western Eurasia along with dispersing Homo sapiens popula- tions. Neandertals did not routinely deploy projectile weapons as subsistence aids. This puzzling gap in their otherwise impressive record for survival in some of the harshest environments ever occupied by primates may reflect energetic constraints and time-budgeting factors associated with complex technology.
  • Patterns of Late Quaternary Megafaunal Extinctions in Europe and Northern Asia

    Patterns of Late Quaternary Megafaunal Extinctions in Europe and Northern Asia

    Cour. Forsch.-Inst. Senckenberg | 259 | 287 – 297 | 2 Figs | Frankfurt a. M., 13. 12. 2007 Patterns of Late Quaternary megafaunal extinctions in Europe and northern Asia With 2 figs Anthony J. STUART & Adrian M. LISTER A b s t r a c t This paper summarizes the results so far of our ‘Late Quaternary Megafaunal Extinctions’ project, focussing on an assessment of latest available dates for selected target species from Europe and northern Asia. Our approach is to directly radiocarbon-date material of extinct megafauna to construct their spatio-temporal histories, and to seek correlations with the environmental and archaeological records with the aim of estab- lishing the cause or causes of extinction. So far we have focussed on Mammuthus primigenius, Coelodonta antiquitatis, and Megaloceros giganteus, and are accumulating data on Panthera leo/spelaea, Crocuta crocuta and Ursus spelaeus. Attempts to date Palaeoloxodon antiquus and Stephanorhinus hemitoechus (from southern Europe) were largely unsuccessful. The pattern of inferred terminal dates is staggered, with extinctions occurring over ca. 30 millennia, with some species previously thought extinct in the Late Pleistocene – M. primigenius and M. giganteus – surviving well into the Holocene. All species show dramatic range shifts in response to climatic/vegeta- tional changes, especially the beginning of the Last Glacial Maximum, Late Glacial Interstadial, Allerød, Younger Dryas and Holocene, and there was a general trend of progressive range reduction and fragmenta- tion prior to final extinction. With the possible exceptions of P. antiquus, S. hemitoechus and Homo nean- derthalensis, extinctions do not correlate with the appearance of modern humans. However, although most of the observed patterns can be attributed to environmental changes, some features – especially failures to recolonize – suggest human involvement.
  • Étude De La Faune Des Niveaux Gravettiens De La Grotte Kozarnika (Bulgarie Du Nord) : Résultats Préliminaires

    Étude De La Faune Des Niveaux Gravettiens De La Grotte Kozarnika (Bulgarie Du Nord) : Résultats Préliminaires

    Étude de la faune des niveaux gravettiens de la grotte Kozarnika (Bulgarie du Nord) : Résultats préliminaires. Jean-Luc Guadelli, Françoise Delpech, Aleta Guadelli, Viviana Miteva To cite this version: Jean-Luc Guadelli, Françoise Delpech, Aleta Guadelli, Viviana Miteva. Étude de la faune des niveaux gravettiens de la grotte Kozarnika (Bulgarie du Nord) : Résultats préliminaires.. Archeologia Bulgar- ica, of Archaeologia Bulgarica, 1999, III/2, pp.1-14. halshs-00133990 HAL Id: halshs-00133990 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00133990 Submitted on 10 Mar 2007 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. 1 ÉTUDE DE LA FAUNE DES NIVEAUX GRAVETTIENS DE LA GROTTE KOZARNIKA (BULGARIE DU NORD) : RESULTATS PRELIMINAIRES. Jean-Luc Guadelli, Françoise Delpech, Aleta Guadelli, Viviana Miteva Résumé : La grotte Kozarnika, située dans le Nord-Ouest de la Bulgarie près de la plaine danubienne, à environ 3 kms du village d’Orechets (district de Belogradtchik) et à quelques 30 kms de la frontière serbe. Cette cavité fait l’objet de campagne de fouilles depuis 3 ans par une équipe bulgaro-française dirigée par N. Sirakov (BAN) et J.-L. Guadelli (CNRS). Les dépôts, reconnus jusqu’à présent sur 6,80 m de profondeur, couvrent les 800 derniers millénaires et la séquence chronoculturelle renferme de la base au sommet : une industrie pour le moment non déterminée datée d’environ 780.000 ans, du Paléolithique moyen, du Paléolithique supérieur archaïque, du Gravettien, de l’Épigravettien et des niveaux post- paléolithiques.
  • The Compositional Integrity of the Aurignacian

    The Compositional Integrity of the Aurignacian

    MUNIBE (Antropologia-Arkeologia) 57 Homenaje a Jesús Altuna 107-118 SAN SEBASTIAN 2005 ISSN 1132-2217 The Compositional Integrity of the Aurignacian La integridad composicional del Auriñaciense KEY WORDS: Aurignacian, lithic typology, lithic technology, organic technology, west Eurasia. PALABRAS CLAVE: Auriñaciense, tipología lítica, tecnología lítica, tecnología orgánica, Eurasia occidental. Geoffrey A. CLARK* Julien RIEL-SALVATORE* ABSTRACT For the Aurignacian to have heuristic validity, it must share a number of defining characteristics that co-occur systematically across space and time. To test its compositional integrity, we examine data from 52 levels identified as Aurignacian by their excavators. Classical indicators of the French Aurignacian are reviewed and used to contextualize data from other regions, allowing us to assess whether or not the Aurignacian can be considered a single, coherent archaeological entity. RESUMEN Para tener validez heurística, el Auriñaciense tiene que compartir características que co-ocurren sistemáticamente a través del espacio y tiempo. Para evaluar su integridad composicional, examinamos aquí los datos procedentes de 52 niveles identificados como ‘Auriñaciense’ por sus excavadores. Se repasan los indicadores ‘clásicos’ del Auriñaciense francés para contextualizar los datos procedentes de otras regio- nes con el objetivo de examinar si el Auriñaciense puede considerarse una sola coherente entidad arqueológica. LABURPENA Baliozkotasun heuristikoa izateko, Aurignac aldiak espazioan eta denboran zehar sistematikoki batera gertatzen diren ezaugarriak partekatu behar ditu. Haren osaketa osotasuna ebaluatzeko, beren hondeatzaileek ‘Aurignac aldikotzat” identifikaturiko 52 mailetatik ateratako datuak aztertzen ditugu hemen. Aurignac aldi frantziarraren adierazle “klasikoak” berrikusten dira beste hainbat eskualdetatik lorturiko datuak bere testuinguruan jartzeko Aurignac aldia entitate arkeologiko bakar eta koherentetzat jo daitekeen aztertzea helburu.
  • Bulgaria Eco Tours and Village Life

    Bulgaria Eco Tours and Village Life

    BULGARIA ECO TOURS AND VILLAGE LIFE www.bulgariatravel.org Unique facts about Bulgaria INTRODUCTION To get to know Bulgaria, one has to dive into its authenticity, to taste the product of its nature, to backpack across the country and to gather bouquets of memories and impressions. The variety of The treasure of Bulgarian nature is well preserved Bulgarian nature offers abundant opportunities for engaging outdoor in the national conservation parks. The climate and activities – one can hike around the many eco trails in the National diverse landscape across the country are combined Parks and preservation areas, observe rare animal and bird species or in a unique way. This is one of the many reasons for visit caves and landmarks. the country to have such an animal and plant diversity. Bulgaria has a dense net of eco trails. There are new routes constantly Many rare, endangered and endemic species live in the marked across the mountains, which makes many places of interest Bulgarian conservation parks. Through the territory and landmarks more accessible. of the country passes Via Pontica – the route of the migratory birds from Europe to Africa. The eco-friendly outdoor activities are easily combined with the opportunity to enjoy rural and alternative tours. One can get acquainted with the authentic Bulgarian folklore and can stay in a traditional vintage village house in the regions of Rila, Pirin, The Rodopi For those who love nature, Bulgaria is the Mountains, Strandzha, Stara Planina (the Balkan Range), the Upper place to be. You can appreciate the full Thracian valley, the Danube and the Black Sea Coast regions.