Bibliography

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Bibliography BIBLIOGRAPHY [Airy, 1834] Airy, G. B. (1834). Gravitation: an elementary explanation of the principal pertur- bations in the solar system. Charles Knight, London. Second edition: Macmillan, London 1884. [Andrewes, 1996] Andrewes, W. J. H., editor (1996). The Quest for Longitude: The Proceedings of the Longitude Symposium, Cambridge, Mass. Collection of Historical Scientific Instruments, Harvard University. [Auwers, 1894] Auwers, A. (1894). Tobias Mayer’s Sternverzeichniss: nach den Beobachtungen auf der Göttinger Sternwarte in den Jahren 1756 bis 1760. Neu bearbeitet von Arthur Auwers. Engelmann, Leipzig. (not seen). [Baasner, 1987] Baasner, R. (1987). Das Lob der Sternkunst: Astronomie in der deutschen Aufk- lärung. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen. [Baily, 1835] Baily, F., editor (1835). An Account of the Revd. John Flamsteed, the first Astronomer- Royal: compiled from his own manuscripts, and other authentic documents, never before pub- lished. London. reprinted Dawson, London, 1966. [Beer and Beer, 1976] Beer, A. and Beer, P., editors (1976). The origins, achievement and influence of the Royal Observatory, Greenwich: 1675–1975. Proceedings of the Symposium held at the National Maritime Museum, Greenwich, 13–18 july 1975. Vistas in Astronomy, Vol. 20. [Bohnenberger, 1795] Bohnenberger, J. (1795). Anleitung zur Geographischen Ortsbestimmung vorzüglich vermittelst des Spiegelsextanten. Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht, Göttingen. Revised by G. A. Jahn, 1852. [Brouwer and Clemence, 1961] Brouwer, D. and Clemence, G. M. (1961). Methods of Celestial Mechanics. Academic Press, New York & London. [Brown, 1896] Brown, E. W. (1896). An Introductory Treatise on the Lunar Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. [Buchwald, 2006] Buchwald, J. Z. (2006). Discrepant Measurements and Experimental Knowledge in the Early Modern Era. Archive for History of Exact Sciences, 60:565–649. [Buchwald and Cohen, 2001] Buchwald, J. Z. and Cohen, I. Bernard, editors (2001). Isaac New- ton’s Natural Philosophy, Dibner Institute studies in the history of science and technology, Cambridge MA. MIT press. [Campbell-Kelly et al., 2003] Campbell-Kelly, M. et al., editors (2003). The History of Mathemat- ical Tables: From Sumer to Spreadsheets. Oxford University Press. [Chandler, 1996] Chandler, B. (1996). Longitude in the Context of Mathematics. In [Andrewes, 1996], pages 34–42. [Chapin, 1978] Chapin, S. L. (1978). Lalande and the Longitude: a little known London Voyage of 1763. Notes & Records of the Royal Society of London, 32:165–180. [Chapman, 1982] Chapman, A. (c1982). Three North Country Astronomers. Richardson, Manch- ester. [Chapront-Touzé and Chapront, 1983] Chapront-Touzé, M. and Chapront, J. (1983). The lunar ephemeris ELP2000. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 124:50–62. [Chauvenet, 1863] Chauvenet, W. (1863). A Manual of Spherical and Practical Astronomy. Lip- pincott & Co., Philadelphia. 2 Vols.; 5th edition 1891. [Clairaut, 1752a] Clairaut, A. C. (1752a). De l’orbite de la lune, en ne négligeant pas les quarrés des quantités de même ordre que les forces perturbatrices. Histoire de l’Académie Royale des Sciences avec les mémoires de mathématique et de physique tirés des registres de cette Académie, (année 1748):421–440. Bibliography 215 [Clairaut, 1752b] Clairaut, A. C. (1752b). Théorie de la lune: déduite du seul principe de l’attraction réciproquement proportionnelle aux quarrés des distances. l’Académie Impériale des Sciences, St. Petersbourg. 2nd enlarged edition: Dessaint, Paris 1765. [Clairaut, 1758] Clairaut, A. C. (1758). Lettre de Monsieur Clairaut a Messieurs les Auteurs du Journal des Sçavans. Journal des Sçavans, pages 67–82. [Cook, 1988] Cook, A. (1988). The Motion of the Moon. Adam Hilger, Bristol. [Cook, 1998] Cook, A. (1998). Edmond Halley: Charting the Heavens and the Seas. Clarendon Press, Oxford. [Cook, 2000] Cook, A. (2000). Success and failure in Newton’s lunar theory. Astronomy & Geo- physics, 41(6):21–25. [Cotter, 1968] Cotter, C. H. (1968). A History of Nautical Astronomy. Hollis & Carter, London. [d’Alembert, 1756] d’Alembert, J. (1754–1756). Recherches sur différens points importans du sys- tème du monde. Chez David l’aîné, Paris. 3 Vols. Faximile reprint: Culture et civilisation, Bruxelles 1966. [d’Alembert, 1780] d’Alembert, J. (1761–1780). Opuscules mathématiques, ou mémoires sur dif- férens sujets de géométrie, de méchanique, d’optique, d’astronomie &c. Chez David l’aîné, Paris. 8 Vols. [Dalen, 1993] Dalen, B. van (1993). Ancient and Medieval Astronomical Tables: mathematical structure and parameter values. PhD thesis, Utrecht University. [Davids, 1985] Davids, C. A. (1985). Zeewezen en Wetenschap: De wetenschap en de ontwikkeling van de navigatietechniek in Nederland tussen 1585 en 1815. De Bataafsche Leeuw, Amster- dam/Dieren. [Delambre, 1806] Delambre, J. B. J. (1806). Tables Astronomiques publiées par le Bureau des Longitudes de France. Première partie. Tables du Soleil par M. Delambre. Tables de la Lune par M. Bürg. Paris. [Delambre, 1827] Delambre, J. B. J. (1827). Histoire de l’Astronomie au dix-huitième Siècle. Bachelier, Parijs. [Eisenhart, 1964] Eisenhart, C. (1964). The Meaning of “Least” In Least Squares. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 54:24–33. [Euler, 1746] Euler, L. (1746). Tabulae astronomicae Solis et Lunae. In Opuscula varii argumenti, volume 1, pages 137–168. Berlin. Reprinted in Opera Omnia II, 23, pp. 1–10. [Euler, 1749a] Euler, L. (1749a). Recherches sur la question des inégalités du mouvement de Sat- urne et de Jupiter (Pièce qui a remporté le prix de l’Académie royale des sciences en 1748 Sur les inégalités du mouvement de Saturne & de Jupiter). Martin, Coignard, and Guerin, Paris. Reprinted in Opera Omnia II, 25, pp. 45–157. [Euler, 1749b] Euler, L. (1749b). Recherches sur le mouvement des corps célestes en général. Mémoires de l’académie des sciences de Berlin, 3:93–143. Reprinted in Opera Omnia II, 25, pp. 1–44. [Euler, 1753] Euler, L. (1753). Theoria motus lunae: exhibens omnes eius inaequalitates. Petropolitanae: Impensis Academiae Imperialis Scientiarum. Reprinted in Opera Omnia II, 23, pp. 64–336. [Euler, 1770a] Euler, L. (1770a). Nouvelle méthode de déterminer les dérangemens dans le mou- vement des corps célestes, causés par leur action mutuelle. Histoire de l’Académie Royale des Sciences et des Belles-Lettres de Berlin, 19:141–179. Reprinted in Opera Omnia II, 26. [Euler, 1770b] Euler, L. (1770b). Réflexions sur les diverses manieres dont on peut représenter le mouvement de la lune. Histoire de l’Académie Royale des Sciences et des Belles-Lettres de Berlin, 19:180–193. Reprinted in Opera Omnia II, 26. [Euler, 1772] Euler, L. (1772). Theoria motuum lunae nova methodo pertractata una cum tabulis astronomicis. Academiae Imperialis Scientiarum, Petropoli. Reprinted in Opera Omnia II, 22. [Farebrother, 1998] Farebrother, R. W. (1998). Fitting Linear Relationships, A History of the Cal- culus of Observations 1750 – 1900. Springer, New York & London. 216 Bibliography [Flamsteed, 1725] Flamsteed, J. (1725). Historia Coelestis Britannica. H Meere, London. [Forbes, 1966] Forbes, E. G. (1966). Tobias Mayer’s Lunar Tables. Annals of Science, 22:105–116. [Forbes, 1971a] Forbes, E. G. (1971a). The Euler-Mayer correspondence (1751–55) : a new per- spective on eighteenth-century advances in the lunar theory. Macmillan, London. [Forbes, 1971b] Forbes, E. G. (1971b). Tobias Mayer’s new astrolabe (1759): its principles and construction. Annals of Science, 27:109–116. [Forbes, 1971c] Forbes, E. G. (1971c). Tobias Mayer’s opera inedita, the first translation of the Lichtenberg edition of 1775. American Elsevier Publishing Company, Inc, New York. [Forbes, 1972] Forbes, E. G. (1972). The unpublished Writings of Tobias Mayer. Arbeiten aus der niedersächsischen Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Göttingen; Bd. 9–11. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen. 3 Vols., 1: Astronomy and Geometry, 2: 2: Artillery and mechanics, 3: The Theory of the Magnet and its application to terrestrial magnetism. [Forbes, 1974] Forbes, E. G. (1974). Tobias Mayer’s debt to Leonhard Euler. In Actes du XIIIe Congrès International d’Histoire des Sciences, volume 6, pages 295–299. [Forbes, 1975] Forbes, E. G. (1975). Greenwich Observatory, The Royal Observatory at Greenwich and Hertmonceux, 1675–1975, volume 1, Origins and early history (1675–1835). Taylor and Francis, London. [Forbes, 1980] Forbes, E. G. (1980). Tobias Mayer (1723–62) : pioneer of enlightened science in Germany. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen. [Forbes, 1983] Forbes, E. G. (1983). La correspondance astronomique entre Joseph-Nicholas Delisle et Tobias Mayer. Revue d’Histoire des Sciences, 36:113–151. [Forbes and Gapaillard, 1996] Forbes, E. G. and Gapaillard, J. (1996). The astronomical correspon- dence between abbé de Lacaille and Tobias Mayer. Revue d’Histoire des Sciences, 49(4):483– 542. [Forbes and Wilson, 1995] Forbes, E. G. and Wilson, C. A. (1995). The solar tables of Lacaille and the lunar tables of Mayer. In [Wilson and Taton, 1995], chapter 18. [Frisius, 1768] Frisius, P. (1768). De gravitate universali corporum libri tres. Milan. [Gaab, 2001] Gaab, H. (2001). Johann Gabriel Doppelmayr (1677–1750). Beiträge zur As- tronomiegeschichte, Band 4:46–99. [Gautier, 1817] Gautier, A. (1817). Essai historique sur le Problème des Trois Corps. Veuve Courcier, Paris. [Gaythorpe, 1957] Gaythorpe, S. B. (1957). Jeremiah Horrox and his ‘New Theory of the Moon’. The Journal of the British Astronomical Association, 67(4):134–144. [Giorgini et al., 1996] Giorgini,
Recommended publications
  • March-April 2017.Pub
    THE OBSERVER The Newsletter of Central Valley Astronomers of Fresno March-April 2017 NASA and ESA Announce “ “It is part of the na- ture of man to start Seven Earth-like Planets with romance and build Within 40 Light Years of Our to reality.” -Ray Solar System Bradbury, referring to the American manned space program In This Issue Profiles in Astrono- my-Tobias Mayer Amateur astrono- mers Needed for Comet Study Eugene Cernan RIP On February 21, 2017, NASA and ESA, the European Space Agency, jointly announced that a star known as Possible Orion-SLS TRAPPIST-1 had seven Earth-like planets circling it. The Flight in 2019 discovery also appeared in the science magazine Nature The Vilnius Obser- the same day. TRAPPIST-1 is a dwarf star approximately vatory 40 light years from Earth. According to the announce- ment and article, all the planets are rocky, not gaseous, Musk Meets with and some may have atmospheres. The TRAPPIST Trump about Mars (Transiting Planets and Planetesimals Small Telescope) telescope is part of ESA’s La Silla Observatory in Chile, Europa Drilling Mis- was specifically designed to find exoplanets, and saw sion on the Books first light in 2010 . It is named in honor of the Trappist CVA members order of monks. Sound Off Artist’s image from NASA/JPL The Observer-The Newsletter or Central Valley Astronomers Vol 65 Issue 2 March-April 2017 From the editor- Central Valley Astrono- mers of Fresno As written in the What’s New in Space column, things Web address have been happening very quickly in the last few weeks.
    [Show full text]
  • A Handbook of Double Stars, with a Catalogue of Twelve Hundred
    The original of this bool< is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924064295326 3 1924 064 295 326 Production Note Cornell University Library pro- duced this volume to replace the irreparably deteriorated original. It was scanned using Xerox soft- ware and equipment at 600 dots per inch resolution and com- pressed prior to storage using CCITT Group 4 compression. The digital data were used to create Cornell's replacement volume on paper that meets the ANSI Stand- ard Z39. 48-1984. The production of this volume was supported in part by the Commission on Pres- ervation and Access and the Xerox Corporation. Digital file copy- right by Cornell University Library 1991. HANDBOOK DOUBLE STARS. <-v6f'. — A HANDBOOK OF DOUBLE STARS, WITH A CATALOGUE OF TWELVE HUNDRED DOUBLE STARS AND EXTENSIVE LISTS OF MEASURES. With additional Notes bringing the Measures up to 1879, FOR THE USE OF AMATEURS. EDWD. CROSSLEY, F.R.A.S.; JOSEPH GLEDHILL, F.R.A.S., AND^^iMES Mt^'^I^SON, M.A., F.R.A.S. "The subject has already proved so extensive, and still ptomises so rich a harvest to those who are inclined to be diligent in the pursuit, that I cannot help inviting every lover of astronomy to join with me in observations that must inevitably lead to new discoveries." Sir Wm. Herschel. *' Stellae fixac, quae in ccelo conspiciuntur, sunt aut soles simplices, qualis sol noster, aut systemata ex binis vel interdum pluribus solibus peculiari nexu physico inter se junccis composita.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Introduction
    1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 SUBJECT Three great mathematicians dominate the history of lunar theory in the middle of the 18th century: Leonhard Euler, Alexis Clairaut, and Jean le Rond d’Alembert. Each of them made a lasting contribution to the theory of celestial mechanics and their results had a broader impact than on lunar theory alone. To name but a few examples, Euler codified the trigonometric functions and pioneered the method of variation of orbital constants; Clairaut solved the arduous problem of the motion of the lunar apogee, thereby dealing a decisive blow to the sceptics of Newton’s law of gravitation; and d’Alembert worked out an accurate theory of precession and nutation. But during the second half of the 18th century, the most accurate tables of lunar motion were those of Tobias Mayer; not because he was better at solving the differ- ential equations of motion, but because he was eager to handle large and conflicting data sets in what could nowadays be called a statistical way. He was a true pioneer in the ‘combination of observations’, which comprises the handling of observational data in order to infer from them certain quantitative aspects of the physical reality. His tables of the moon’s motion had an important application in the determination of geographical longitude at sea, by the so-called method of lunar distances. What is known of Mayer’s work on lunar motion? Alfred Gautier, the 19th century astronomer, included a brief analysis of the contents of Mayer’s Theoria Lunae in his essay on the history of the three-body problem.1 Delambre, although full of admiration for Mayer, dedicated only a few lines to it.2 The 20th century research by Eric Forbes, culminating in a biography of Mayer, has brought about something of a Mayer revival.3 Forbes has constructed a unifying picture of the man Mayer and his work, after thorough investigation of correspondence, unpublished treatises and memoirs, and published sources as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Tales from the Nineteenth-Century Archives
    Max Planck Research Library for the History and Development of Knowledge Studies 12 Lorraine Daston: The Accidental Trace and the Science of the Future: Tales from the Nineteenth- Century Archives In: Julia Bärnighausen, Costanza Caraffa, Stefanie Klamm, Franka Schneider, and Petra Wodtke (eds.): Photo-Objects : On the Materiality of Photographs and Photo Archives Online version at http://mprl-series.mpg.de/studies/12/ ISBN 978-3-945561-39-3 First published 2019 by Edition Open Access, Max Planck Institute for the History of Science. Printed and distributed by: PRO BUSINESS digital printing Deutschland GmbH, Berlin http://www.book-on-demand.de/shop/15803 The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available in the Internet at http://dnb.d-nb.de Chapter 4 The Accidental Trace and the Science of the Future: Tales from the Nineteenth­Century Archives Lorraine Daston Introduction: glass and paper forever This glass photographic plate of a small square of the night sky, taken on a clear winter’s night in Potsdam in 1894, is one of the around two million such astrophotographic plates stored in observatories all over the world (Lankford 1984, 29) (see Fig. 1). There are ap­ proximately 600,000 plates at the Harvard College Observatory, 20,000 at the Bologna Uni­ versity Observatory, 80,000 at the Odessa Astronomical Observatory, to give just a few examples (Hudec 1999). The designation of these collections as “archives” is mostly ret­ rospective, but the glass plate pictured here was destined from the outset to be part of an archive: the vast astrophotographic survey of the sky as seen from the earth known as the Carte du Ciel.
    [Show full text]
  • My Math Genealogy Graph
    Nilos Kabasilas Elissaeus Judaeus Demetrios Kydones Georgios Plethon Gemistos Manuel Chrysoloras (1380) Basilios Bessarion Guarino da Verona Mystras (1436) (1408) Johannes Argyropoulos Università di Padova (1444) Vittorino da Feltre Marsilio Ficino Cristoforo Landino Università di Padova (1416) Università di Firenze (1462) Theodoros Gazes Ognibene (Omnibonus Leonicenus) Bonisoli da Lonigo Angelo Poliziano Constantinople / Università di Mantova (1433) Università di Mantova Università di Firenze (1477) Heinrich von Langenstein Rudolf Agricola Demetrios Chalcocondyles Scipione Fortiguerra Leo Outers Thomas à Kempis Jacob ben Jehiel Loans Gaetano da Thiene Alessandro Sermoneta Moses Perez Université de Paris (1363) Università degli Studi di Ferrara (1478) Mystras / Accademia Romana (1452) Università di Firenze (1493) Université Catholique de Louvain (1485) Johannes von Gmunden Alexander Hegius Jan Standonck Janus Lascaris Johann (Johannes Kapnion) Reuchlin François Dubois Nicoletto Vernia Pietro Roccabonella Girolamo (Hieronymus Aleander) Aleandro Maarten (Martinus Dorpius) van Dorp Matthaeus Adrianus Jean Tagault Pelope Universität Wien (1406) (1474) Collège Sainte-Barbe / Collège de Montaigu (1474) Università di Padova (1472) Universität Basel / Université de Poitiers (1477) Université de Paris (1516) Università di Padova Università di Padova Università di Padova (1499) Université Catholique de Louvain (1504) Georg von Peuerbach Desiderius Erasmus Jacobus (Jacques Masson) Latomus Marco Musuro Jan (Johannes Campensis) van Campen Jacobus
    [Show full text]
  • Biographical Memoir of Asaph Hall*
    BIOGRAPHICAL MEMOIR ASAPH HALL 1829-1907 GEORGE WILLIAM HILL READ HEI-OIIK THE NATION.\I, ACADEMY OF SCIENCES AI-KH> 2:>, loos (25) 241 BIOGRAPHICAL MEMOIR OF ASAPH HALL* Tn commencing the story of a remarkable man of science, it is necessary to say something of his lineage, in spite of the gener- ally held opinion that the details of genealogy make dry read- ing, f ASAPH HALL undoubtedly descended from John Hall, called of New Haven and Wallingford to distinguish him from the other numerous John Halls of early New England (Savage makes no less than seven before 1660), and who arrived at New Haven shortly after June 4, 1639, as he is one of the after-signers of tlie New Haven Planters' Covenant. His movements before his arrival are in some obscurity. From his son Thomas of Wal- lingford receiving a grant of fifty acres of land from the General Court of the Colony at the session of October, 1698, "In consid- eration of his father's services in the Pequot war," it is inferred that he was a dweller in the colony in 1637. At this date there were only four settlements in Connecticut, and it is supposed that the John Hall of New Haven is identical with a John Hall who appears as the holder of lots in Hartford about 1635. The genealogists arc in dispute in the matter. Mr. Shepard sums up thus: John Hall came with the advance Hooker party, in 1632, or perhaps on the Griffin or the Bird (two vessels whose arrival at Massachusetts Bay is mentioned by Winthrop), September 4, 1633.
    [Show full text]
  • A Topical Index to the Main Articles in Mercury Magazine (1972 – 2019) Compiled by Andrew Fraknoi (U
    A Topical Index to the Main Articles in Mercury Magazine (1972 – 2019) Compiled by Andrew Fraknoi (U. of San Francisco) [Mar. 9, 2020] Note: This index, organized by subject matter, only covers the longer articles in the Astronomical Society of the Pacific’s popular-level magazine; it omits news notes, regular columns, Society doings, etc. Within each subject category, articles are listed in chronological order starting with the most recent one. Table of Contents Impacts Amateur Astronomy Infra-red Astronomy Archaeoastronomy Interdisciplinary Topics Asteroids Interstellar Matter Astrobiology Jupiter Astronomers Lab Activities Astronomy: General Light in Astronomy Binary Stars Light Pollution Black Holes Mars Comets Mercury Cosmic Rays Meteors and Meteorites Cosmology Moon Distances in Astronomy Nebulae Earth Neptune Eclipses Neutrinos Education in Astronomy Particle Physics & Astronomy Exoplanets Photography in Astronomy Galaxies Pluto Galaxy (The Milky Way) Pseudo-science (Debunking) Gamma-ray Astronomy Public Outreach Gravitational Lenses Pulsars and Neutron Stars Gravitational Waves Quasars and Active Galaxies History of Astronomy Radio Astronomy Humor in Astronomy Relativity and Astronomy 1 Saturn Sun SETI Supernovae & Remnants Sky Phenomena Telescopes & Observatories Societal Issues in Astronomy Ultra-violet Astronomy Solar System (General) Uranus Space Exploration Variable Stars Star Clusters Venus Stars & Stellar Evolution X-ray Astronomy _______________________________________________________________________ Amateur Astronomy Hostetter, D. Sidewalk Astronomy: Bridge to the Universe, 2013 Winter, p. 18. Fienberg, R. & Arion, D. Three Years after the International Year of Astronomy: An Update on the Galileoscope Project, 2012 Autumn, p. 22. Simmons, M. Sharing Astronomy with the World [on Astronomers without Borders], 2008 Spring, p. 14. Williams, L. Inspiration, Frame by Frame: Astro-photographer Robert Gendler, 2004 Nov/Dec, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Sirius Brightest Diamond in the Night Sky Jay B
    Sirius Brightest Diamond in the Night Sky Jay B. Holberg Sirius Brightest Diamond in the Night Sky Published in association with 4y Sprringei i Praxis Publishing Chichester, UK Dr Jay B. Holberg Senior Research Scientist Lunar and Planetary Laboratory University of Arizona Tucson Arizona U.S.A. SPRINGER-PRAXIS BOOKS IN POPULAR ASTRONOMY SUBJECT ADVISORY EDITOR: John Mason B.Sc, M.Sc, Ph.D. ISBN 10: 0-387-48941-X Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York ISBN 13: 978-0-387-48941-4 Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York Springer is part of Springer-Science + Business Media (springer.com) Library of Congress Control Number: 2006938990 Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of research or private study, or criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, this publication may only be reproduced, stored or transmitted, in any form or by any means, with the prior permission in writing of the publishers, or in the case of reprographic reproduction in accordance with the terms of licences issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside those terms should be sent to the publishers. © Praxis Publishing Ltd, Chichester, UK, 2007 Printed in Germany The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. Cover design: Jim Wilkie Project management: Originator Publishing Services,
    [Show full text]
  • Leonhard Euler's Early Lunar Theories 1725–1752
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by RERO DOC Digital Library Arch. Hist. Exact Sci. (2013) 67:235–303 DOI 10.1007/s00407-012-0112-y Leonhard Euler’s early lunar theories 1725–1752 Part 1: first approaches, 1725–1730 Andreas Verdun Received: 9 October 2012 / Published online: 2 December 2012 © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013 Abstract Leonhard Euler (1707–1783) published two lunar theories in 1753 and 1772. He also published lunar tables in 1745, 1746, and—anonymously—in 1750. There are notebook records, unpublished manuscripts, and manuscript fragments by Euler reflecting the development of his lunar theories between about 1725 until about 1752. These documents might be used to reconstruct Euler’s theory on which he based his calculations of those lunar tables and to analyze the development of his lunar theories within this time span. The results of this analysis will be published here in three parts representing three stages of Euler’s research on this topic: First approaches (about 1725–1730), developing the methods (about 1730–1744), and the breakthrough (about 1744–1752). In this part, I analyze Euler’s manuscripts and, predominantly, Euler’s records of his first two notebooks written between 1725 and 1730. I found that his early theoretical approach is coined by his development of analytical (rational) mechanics of punctiform bodies moved by central forces. He tried to describe the Moon’s motion in terms of two simultaneously acting centripetal forces, Huygens’ centrifugal theorem, and associated osculating radii. In memoriam Emil A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Creation of Color in Eighteenth-Century Europe: Number, O
    The Creation of Color in 18th-Century Europe Number, Order, Form Sarah Lowengard Number, Order, Form Color Systems and Systematization Assume that it is possible to determine the number of colors in the world. Ignore, for the moment, certain philosophical and physiological questions—for example, whether a color exists if it cannot be seen and if the number of colors must be different for each person because it is a unique product of the physics and biology of the eye. While these considerations are important in themselves, they are, for our purposes, tangential. If we can agree that the number of colors is finite and determinable, then what is that number, and how is it calculated? How do the answers to these questions aid the work of colorists, whether scientists, manufacturers, experimenters, or the unaffiliated curious? Assume also that there is some primordial physical form for colors, one that conveys critical information to the viewer at a glance. What should this be? What should it tell? How should it be created? How, exactly, will this critical information aid and reflect the development of the practices and theories of color? Finally, accept that the relationship among coloring materials is such that specific mixtures of certain colors yield specific other colors. There must be, then, some small number of colors from which all others are made. What is that number, and what are those colors? I have begun upon a great undertaking. The arrangement of my fossils and making a catalogue for them. As a Potter I make clays my first article, after which stones vitrifiable will follow, but I cannot draw the line betwixt clays and some of the stones.
    [Show full text]
  • Milestones in the History of Thematic Cartography, Statistical Graphics, and Data Visualization∗
    Milestones in the history of thematic cartography, statistical graphics, and data visualization∗ Michael Friendly October 16, 2008 1 Introduction The only new thing in the world is the history you don’t know. Harry S Truman, quoted by David McCulloch in Truman The graphic portrayal of quantitative information has deep roots. These roots reach into histories of thematic cartography, statistical graphics, and data visualization, which are intertwined with each other. They also connect with the rise of statistical thinking up through the 19th century, and developments in technology into the 20th century. From above ground, we can see the current fruit; we must look below to see its pedigree and germination. There certainly have been many new things in the world of visualization; but unless you know its history, everything might seem novel. A brief overview The earliest seeds arose in geometric diagrams and in the making of maps to aid in navigation and explo- ration. By the 16th century, techniques and instruments for precise observation and measurement of physical quantities were well-developed— the beginnings of the husbandry of visualization. The 17th century saw great new growth in theory and the dawn of practice— the rise of analytic geometry, theories of errors of measurement, the birth of probability theory, and the beginnings of demographic statistics and “political arithmetic”. Over the 18th and 19th centuries, numbers pertaining to people—social, moral, medical, and economic statistics began to be gathered in large and periodic series; moreover, the usefulness of these bod- ies of data for planning, for governmental response, and as a subject worth of study in its own right, began to be recognized.
    [Show full text]
  • Method for Determining the Longitude of Places by Observing Occultations of Fixed Stars by the Moon*
    Synopsis of Leonhard Euler's 1749 paper: METHOD FOR DETERMINING THE LONGITUDE OF PLACES BY OBSERVING OCCULTATIONS OF FIXED STARS BY THE MOON* By Jennifer Grabowski, Jeffrey Meyer, and Erik Tou Carthage College, June 2009 1. History of the problem Navigation has been important in traveling as well as safety. For example, in 1707, a British fleet made an error on their longitude findings that sent them in the wrong direction where four of the five ships were destroyed and nearly two thousand soldiers lost their lives. This problem may have been avoided if the sailors had an accurate method of finding longitude. In 1714, the British Parliament passed the Longitude Act, which offered £20,000 to anyone who could calculate longitude to within a half degree. Since one degree of longitude can be as much as 69 miles, even a fraction of a degree comes out to a significant distance. Therefore, the required method would need to be very accurate. In the late 1720s, a self-educated British watchmaker named John Harrison set out to construct a sea clock which could keep accurate enough time to calculate longitude. Harrison succeeded in constructing a sea clock in 1735 which was deserving of the £20,000 prize. However, he was very critical of his machine even though everyone else, including the royal board of longitude, was very impressed. The sextant was then invented by a couple of inventors during the same time period. A sextant had incorporated a longer measuring arc as well as a telescope. These additional pieces enabled the device to measure distances during the day from the moon to the sun and from the moon to the stars at night.
    [Show full text]