DOCSLIB.ORG

Reviews How Andrew Jackson Saved the Cherokees

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Reviews How Andrew Jackson Saved the Cherokees v5n4.book Page 443 Friday, June 28, 2002 9:19 PM Reviews How Andrew Jackson Saved the Cherokees Robert V. Remini Andrew Jackson and His Indian Wars Viking 2001 Richard White ecause Americans so often claim to be Indians? American troops are now in the Bal- the democratic conscience of the world, kans to prevent the displacement of entire peo- BAmerican Indian policy has cast a long ples; they once marched into the Southeastern international shadow. One of the darkest parts United States to displace entire peoples. of that shadow has been Indian removal: the Given these claimed parallels between coerced migration in the 1830s and 1840s of tens ethnic cleansing and Indian removal, any of thousands of Indians to open up lands for examination of Indian removal will inevitably American settlers east of the Mississippi River. involve discussions of ethnic cleansing. Indian When criticized by Americans for dispossess- removal is an intellectual mineÕeld, and ing, killing, or exiling a minority population, historians trying to traverse it had better carry modern tyrants and their supporters reÔexively a good map, otherwise they can end up where point to the treatment of Indians by the United they would rather not go. Robert Remini in his States as a precedent and to their critics as discussion of Andrew Jackson’s Indian wars hypocrites. From Adolph Hitler justifying the carries half a map. He probably knows more Nazi campaign for lebensraum to supporters of about Andrew Jackson than any person alive. Slobodan Milosevic’s policy against Bosnians Unfortunately he appears to know as little and Kosovars, proponents of what is now about Indian peoples as most American called ethnic cleansing have cited American historians. His knowledge and ignorance fuse Indian policy to justify their own actions and to to make Andrew Jackson and His Indian Wars a stymie their American critics. Why should disturbingly obtuse book about a man who they listen to a people whose own prosperity is probably inÔicted more pain, suÖering, loss, built on land and resources plundered from and death upon Indian peoples than any Richard White is the Margaret Byrne Professor of American History at Stanford University. 443 v5n4.book Page 444 Friday, June 28, 2002 9:19 PM Richard White American of the nineteenth century. Remini’s assertion that removal saved the This obtuseness does not arise from Southeastern Indians is audacious and dis- Remini’s refusal to acknowledge the suÖering turbing, but that is no reason to dismiss it. If Jackson caused. He places Indian removal at Remini is right and removal did secure the the heart of the horrors Indians experienced. survival of the so-called “Five Civilized Tribes” Remini never diminishes the death and of the Southeast – the Choctaws, Chickasaws, destruction that Jackson brought and never Cherokees, Creeks, and Seminoles – who denies Jackson’s moral culpability. Remini certainly have survived, then he should say so condemns Jackson and his contemporaries for no matter how oÖensive it may be and no their corruption, their racism, their greed, and matter how many unpalatable historical paral- their refusal to accept responsibility for the lels it reveals. The claim, however, gives him the suÖering they inÔicted. What is obtuse is burden of examining Indian lives closely to Remini’s own conclusion. Out of this circus of demonstrate that the peoples in question owe horrors, Remini contends, there came great their survival to removal. He needs to write good: Andrew Jackson “saved the Five Civilized about Indians as carefully and knowledgeably Nations from probable extinction.” It is not as he does about Jackson. hard to imagine the outcry if a German There are Indians galore in Remini’s book, historian oÖered a similar assessment of the but they are clearly the supporting cast. They results of the German search for lebensraum or are the stock Indians of American history – if the survival of the Kosovars and Bosnians as sometimes noble, sometimes murderous, coherent groups were credited to Slobodan usually tragic, and always simple. They are not Milesovic’s ethnic cleansing. people who will get to evaluate the results of Although proclamations of the beneÕcent their own dispossession and exile. They will results of Indian removal have not been not even get the beneÕt of any detailed evalua- much heard since the nineteenth century, tion of their fate. Jackson’s opinions matter Remini’s point of departure for his surpris- much more than theirs, and Jackson gets the ing destination is quite conventional. Like vast majority of Remini’s attention. many American historians, Remini denies To explain Jackson, Remini needs to explain that American Indian policy was genocidal. Jackson’s initial Indian hating, and so he begins No matter what the results of its actions, the his narrative with what are really a set of United States claimed that it was trying to generic stories in which Jackson is, like the save the lives of Indian peoples and Indians he hates, less an historical Õgure than a eventually to assimilate them, one by one, type. Herman Melville captured and dissected into the American population. But having the Indian hater in The ConÕdence Man. Indian dismissed genocide, Remini never explicitly haters thirsted for revenge for Indian atrocities; confronts the tougher question of whether they existed only to kill Indians; they became Indian removal constituted a form of what white Indians more skilled in woodlore and we now call ethnic cleansing. Although geno- violence than their adversaries. They were cide accomplishes ethnic cleansing – the relentless and merciless. forced removal of a population from its Remini makes Jackson’s hatred of Indians native land – not all ethnic cleansing is seem nearly inevitable, the shared mark of all genocidal. Ethnic cleansers want to get rid of backcountry settlers. There was, however, minority populations, and are hardly nothing inevitable about Indian hating in the solicitous of their welfare, but they do not South Carolina backcountry of Jackson’s necessarily want to kill them. youth. James Merrell’s The Indians’ New World 444 5 G r e e n B a g 2 d 4 4 3 v5n4.book Page 445 Friday, June 28, 2002 9:19 PM How Andrew Jackson Saved the Cherokees gives a far more nuanced account of the world world in which Indian hating was the sole in which Jackson came of age. The Catawbas possible outcome of contact between the races. were an Indian people who lived near the In Remini’s narrative the early mythic Jacksons. They were allies of whites, Õrst the Jackson gradually yields to the historic Jackson, British and then Americans, against other a young man on the make in Tennessee who Indians. There was plenty of violence, conÔict, did hate and distrust Indians. In a 1792 letter to and hatred between Indians and whites in the John McKee, a commissioner sent to make South Carolina backcountry but also enough peace with the Chickamauga branch of the cooperation to indicate possibilities of a Cherokees, Jackson condemned peace talks as grudging accommodation. This was not a “Delusions.” Experience “teaches us that Trea- ties answer No other Purpose than opening an Easy door for the Indian to pass through to Butcher our Citizens.” Citi- zens were innocent victims of barbarous murderers, and the Creeks and Cherokees had failed to abide by existing trea- ties and surrender the “butch- ers who kill our people.” “If they [the murderers] are not given up it is an infringement of the Treaty and a cause of war and the whole Nation ought to be Scurged for the infringe- ment of the Treaty for as the Nation will not give murderers up when demanded it is a[n] acknowledgement of their Consent to the Commission of the Crime therefore all are Equally guilty.” Jackson was not blind. He recognized that invasion of Indian lands and the murder of Indians by whites precipitated the chronic violence along the borders, but this would over time become yet another argument to dis- possess Indians. Since whites Osceola was the most effective opponent of Jackson’s Indian removal program, desired their land – and it leading the Seminoles during the first years of the Second Seminole War until, never occurred to that they as Remini reports, he was “tricked into attending a meeting under a flag of didn’t deserve it – then the only truce to negotiate the release of three captured chiefs. The great chief was seized and interned at Fort Marion in St. Augustine. After a few months he lasting solution was the died on January 31, 1838.” removal of Indians. Green Bag • Summer 2002 445 v5n4.book Page 446 Friday, June 28, 2002 9:19 PM Richard White What Jackson believed as a young man did United States feared both the Spanish, who not always accurately reÔect or have much retained Florida, and the British, who while no inÔuence on actual American Indian policy, longer perched on the American border but as he rose in the world, what he believed maintained ties with various Indian peoples became more important. It still might not that persisted from the days when West always conform to oÓcial policy, but, as Rem- Florida was a British colony. The threat of a ini notes: “On more than one occasion … he European-Indian alliance against the southern would simply ignore government orders United States was both real and potent. It was regarding the Indians and act according to his the national security argument that made own perception of what was the proper course Jackson an early convert to JeÖerson’s idea of of action.” removing the Indians west of the Mississippi. To act on his own authority, however, Remini’s emphasis on national security as Jackson had to be in a position of authority, the heart of Jackson’s conviction that removal and he quickly discovered that by tempera- was necessary is both convincing and original, ment he was happier as a soldier than as a and it strengthens the parallels between Indian politician.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • H. Doc. 108-222
    EIGHTEENTH CONGRESS MARCH 4, 1823, TO MARCH 3, 1825 FIRST SESSION—December 1, 1823, to May 27, 1824 SECOND SESSION—December 6, 1824, to March 3, 1825 VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES—DANIEL D. TOMPKINS, of New York PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE OF THE SENATE—JOHN GAILLARD, 1 of South Carolina SECRETARY OF THE SENATE—CHARLES CUTTS, of New Hampshire SERGEANT AT ARMS OF THE SENATE—MOUNTJOY BAYLY, of Maryland SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES—HENRY CLAY, 2 of Kentucky CLERK OF THE HOUSE—MATTHEW ST. CLAIR CLARKE, 3 of Pennsylvania SERGEANT AT ARMS OF THE HOUSE—THOMAS DUNN, of Maryland; JOHN O. DUNN, 4 of District of Columbia DOORKEEPER OF THE HOUSE—BENJAMIN BIRCH, of Maryland ALABAMA GEORGIA Waller Taylor, Vincennes SENATORS SENATORS REPRESENTATIVES William R. King, Cahaba John Elliott, Sunbury Jonathan Jennings, Charlestown William Kelly, Huntsville Nicholas Ware, 8 Richmond John Test, Brookville REPRESENTATIVES Thomas W. Cobb, 9 Greensboro William Prince, 14 Princeton John McKee, Tuscaloosa REPRESENTATIVES AT LARGE Gabriel Moore, Huntsville Jacob Call, 15 Princeton George W. Owen, Claiborne Joel Abbot, Washington George Cary, Appling CONNECTICUT Thomas W. Cobb, 10 Greensboro KENTUCKY 11 SENATORS Richard H. Wilde, Augusta SENATORS James Lanman, Norwich Alfred Cuthbert, Eatonton Elijah Boardman, 5 Litchfield John Forsyth, Augusta Richard M. Johnson, Great Crossings Henry W. Edwards, 6 New Haven Edward F. Tattnall, Savannah Isham Talbot, Frankfort REPRESENTATIVES AT LARGE Wiley Thompson, Elberton REPRESENTATIVES Noyes Barber, Groton Samuel A. Foote, Cheshire ILLINOIS Richard A. Buckner, Greensburg Ansel Sterling, Sharon SENATORS Henry Clay, Lexington Ebenezer Stoddard, Woodstock Jesse B. Thomas, Edwardsville Robert P. Henry, Hopkinsville Gideon Tomlinson, Fairfield Ninian Edwards, 12 Edwardsville Francis Johnson, Bowling Green Lemuel Whitman, Farmington John McLean, 13 Shawneetown John T.
    [Show full text]
  • The Battle of Horseshoe Bend: Collision of Cultures
    National Park Service Teaching with Historic Places U.S. Department of the Interior The Battle of Horseshoe Bend: Collision of Cultures The Battle of Horseshoe Bend: Collision of Cultures (Horseshoe Bend National Military Park) Today the Tallapoosa River quietly winds its way through east-central Alabama, its banks edged by the remnants of the forest that once covered the Southeast. About halfway down its 270-mile run to the southwest, the river curls back on itself to form a peninsula. The land defined by this "horseshoe bend" covers about 100 wooded acres; a finger of high ground points down its center, and an island stands sentinel on its west side. This tranquil setting belies the violence that cut through Horseshoe Bend on March 27, 1814. On the peninsula stood 1,000 American Indian warriors, members of the tribe European Americans knew as the Creek. These men, along with 350 women and children, had arrived over the previous six months in search of refuge. Many had been part of a series of costly battles during the past year, all fought in an attempt to regain the autonomy the Indians had held before the arrival of European Americans. Surrounding the Creek were forces led by future President Andrew Jackson, then a major general of the Tennessee Militia. The core of his force was 2,600 European American soldiers, most of whom hoped that a victory would open native land to European American settlement. Yet this fight was not simply European American versus American Indian: on Jackson's side were 600 "friendly" Indians, including 100 Creek.
    [Show full text]
  • The Struggle Against Choctaw
    “WE ARE CLAY PEOPLE”: THE STRUGGLE AGAINST CHOCTAW COMMUNAL DISSOLUTION, 1801-1861 By Gary Coleman Cheek Jr. A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of Mississippi State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History in the Department of History Mississippi State, Mississippi May 2010 Copyright by Gary Coleman Cheek Jr. 2010 “WE ARE CLAY PEOPLE”: THE STRUGGLE AGAINST CHOCTAW COMMUNAL DISSOLUTION, 1801-1861 By Gary Coleman Cheek Jr. Approved: _________________________________ _________________________________ Anne Marshall Alan I. Marcus Assistant Professor of History Chair and Professor of History (Director of Dissertation) (Committee Member) _________________________________ _________________________________ Evan Peacock Jason K. Phillips Associate Professor of Anthropology Associate Professor of History (Committee Member) (Committee Member) _________________________________ _________________________________ Peter C. Messer Gary L. Myers Associate Professor of History Dean of the College of Arts and Sciences Director of Graduate Studies in the Department of History (Committee Member) Name: Gary Coleman Cheek Jr. Date of Degree: May 1, 2010 Institution: Mississippi State University Major Field: History (Native America) Major Professor: Dr. Anne Marshall Title of Study: “WE ARE CLAY PEOPLE”: THE STRUGGLE AGAINST CHOCTAW COMMUNAL DISSOLUTION, 1801-1861 Pages in Study: 359 Candidate for Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Acculturation has become an integral part of scholarship about Native Americans in the Southeast. Recent studies have focused on trade the eighteenth century and Choctaw entry into the American market economy during the beginning of the nineteenth century. This study analyzes acculturation from 1801 to 1861, carrying the story about cultural change and persistence through the Removal era and to the American Civil War.
    [Show full text]
  • Chief John Ross of Ihe Cherokees As a Historical Figure in an Oklahoma History Class at Northeastern State
    - Copyright 1975 by Gary Evan Moulton All rights reserved. No part of this thesis may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, record- ing, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the author. JOHN ROSS, CHEROKEE CHIEF By GARY EVAN MOULTON N Bachelor of Arts in Education Northeastern State College Tahlequah, Oklahoma 1968 Master of Arts Oklahoma State University Stillwat~r, Oklahoma 1970 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY May, 1974 \ TllE5iS 1q'14-D Meil '1J' c.cp, ~ OKLAHOh\A STATE Ut~IVERS.ITY UiRARY MAY 6 1975 · JOHN ROSS, CHEROKEE CHIEF Thesis Approved: Dean of the Graduate College 907122 ii PREFACE I first became acquainted with Chief John Ross of ihe Cherokees as a historical figure in an Oklahoma history class at Northeastern State College at Tahlequah, Oklahoma, the old capital of the Cherokee Nation. Frequently I walked the very grounds over which Ross had strolled more than a century before. Yet no interest in Ross or Cherokee history was sparked in me. Several years later, Ross as a major research topic was suggested in a graduate seminar. I soon discovered that Ross had no adequate biography and, in fact, that a great deal of his life remained a mystery, especially his private and family life and his personal finances. Indeed, even large questions in his political career remained untreated, disputed, or unanswered.
    [Show full text]
  • 1816 Treaty of Fort Stephens
    1816 Treaty of Fort St. Stephens TREATY WITH THE CHOCTAW, 1816. Oct. 24, 1816. 7 Stat., 152. Proclamation, Dec. 30, 1816 Indian Affairs: Laws and Treaties. Vol. II (Treaties). Compiled and edited by Charles J. Kappler. Washington: Government Printing Office, 1904. Vol. II, Page 137 Vol. II, Page Images 137 Margin Notes: Cession. Consideration. A treaty of cession between the United States of America and the Chactaw nation of Indians. James Madison, president of the United States of America, by general John Coffee, John Rhea, and John M’Keek, esquires, commissioners on the part of the United States, duly authorized for that purpose, on the one part, and the mingoes, leaders, captains, and warriors, of the Chactaw nation, in general council assembled, in behalf of themselves and the whole nation, on the other part, have entered into the following articles, which, when ratified by the president of the United States, with the advice and consent of the senate, shall be obligatory on both parties: ARTICLE I. The Chactaw nation, for the consideration hereafter mentioned, cede to the United States all their title and claim to lands lying east of the following boundary, beginning at the mouth of Ooktibbuha, the Chickasaw boundary, and running from thence down the Tombigby river, until it intersects the northern boundary of a cession made to the United States by the Chactaws, at Mount Dexter, on the 16th November, 1805. ARTICLE II. In consideration of the foregoing cession, the United States engage to pay to the Chactaw nation the sum of six thousand dollars annually, for twenty years; they also agree to pay them in merchandise, to be delivered immediately on signing the present treaty, the sum of ten thousand dollars.
    [Show full text]
  • John Mckee Barr Is a Professor of History at Lone Star College— Kingwood in North Houston, Texas
    CONTRIBUTORS TO THIS ISSUE John McKee Barr is a Professor of History at Lone Star College— Kingwood in North Houston, Texas. He is the author of Loathing Lincoln: An American Tradition from the Civil War to the Present (LSU Press, 2014), which won the Jules and Frances Landry Award from that press. A portion of the book, critiquing Lerone Bennett’s work on Lincoln, appeared in the Winter 2014 Journal of the Abraham Lin- coln Association. Daniel Feller is Professor of History, Distinguished Professor in the Humanities, and Editor/Director of The Papers of Andrew Jackson at the University of Tennessee in Knoxville. Danielle C. Forand is studying American Studies and political science at Christopher Newport University in Newport News, Vir- ginia. In 2019 she worked in U.S. senator Mark Warner’s office in Washington, D.C. M. Keith Harris teaches history at a private high school in Los Angeles and contributes regularly to his website, TheRogueHisto- rian.com. He received his Ph.D. from the University of Virginia and is author of Across the Bloody Chasm: The Culture of Commemoration among Civil War Veterans (LSU Press, 2014). He is currently at work on a book about the 1915 silent film The Birth of a Nation. Glenn W. LaFantasie is the Richard Frockt Family Professor of History and a Professor of History at Western Kentucky University. He is at work on a major study with the tentative title Our Union to Restore: Abraham Lincoln, Ulysses S. Grant, and the Transformation of the United States, under contract with Oxford University Press.
    [Show full text]
  • The Destruction of Muskogee Autonomy Before the Creek War by Adam Oliver
    The Destruction of Muskogee Autonomy Before the Creek War by Adam Oliver By the early 1800s, factionalism within the Creek Nation and a deep dependence on European goods, particularly gunpowder, had already weakened the Muskogee way of life beyond rectification. Although construction of the invasive Federal Road can be viewed as the end of Creek Nation’s autonomy outside of white dominance, the European trade tether was an earlier, more powerful tool of control. The loose confederate ties that allowed it to volley conflicting white powers (England, U.S., France, and Spain) off of each other destroyed the possibility of an autonomous Creek Nation outside of the United States. The internal weakness of the Muskogees perhaps began long before a U.S. presence on the eastern seaboard. Instead of a road, we can look to the gun. The gun did not necessarily change the war style or discipline of the Creeks. However, because of gunpowder, this powerful Nation was unable to rely on its own goods and products such as furs, to support trade. Guns, bullets, and gunpowder were domestic tools that rapidly changed the social and political structure of Creek society. These goods destroyed the Muskogee way of life more effectively and far earlier than any road cut through the Old Southwest. These tools were not produced by the Muskogee but could not be abandoned, either. The buckskin trade of the Southeast had expanded so much that the men in villages were forced to travel farther from their traditional hunting grounds in order to bring in greater quantities to trade for gunpowder, munitions, and rum.
    [Show full text]
  • H-Diplo Roundtable, Vol. XI, No. 2
    2009 h-diplo Roundtable Editors: Thomas Maddux and Diane Labrosse H-Diplo Roundtable Review Roundtable Web Editor: George Fujii www.h-net.org/~diplo/roundtables Introduction by Thomas Maddux Volume XI, No. 2 (2009) Reviewers: Andrew Cayton, James G. Cusick, James E. 10 September 2009 Lewis, Jr., William E. Weeks J.C.A. Stagg. Borderlines in Borderlands: James Madison and the Spanish-American Frontier, 1776-1821. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2009. 320 pp. (cloth; $50.00). ISBN: 978- 0300139051. Stable URL: http://www.h-net.org/~diplo/roundtables/PDF/Roundtable-XI-2.pdf Contents Introduction by Thomas Maddux, California State University, Northridge.............................. 2 Review by Andrew Cayton, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio .................................................... 8 Review by James G. Cusick, University of Florida ................................................................... 12 Review by James E. Lewis, Jr., Kalamazzo College .................................................................. 15 Review by William E. Weeks, University of California at San Diego ....................................... 19 Response by J.C.A. Stagg, University of Virginia ..................................................................... 23 Copyright © 2009 H-Net: Humanities and Social Sciences Online. H-Net permits the redistribution and reprinting of this work for non-profit, educational purposes, with full and accurate attribution to the author(s), web location, date of publication, H-Diplo, and H-Net: Humanities & Social Sciences Online. For other uses, contact the H-Diplo editorial staff at [email protected]. H-Diplo Roundtable Reviews, Vol. XI, No. 2 (2009) Introduction by Thomas Maddux, California State University, Northridge ll historians look forward into the contemporary period of their study and most also look back with hindsight to evaluate the consequences of their subject whether it be A an individual leader, an international conference, bilateral relations or a diplomatic/military engagement.
    [Show full text]
  • Witness: ,James Gadsden, Secretary, William Cocke, . ,John Rhea, Malcum Mcgee, James Colbert, Interpreter
    TREATY WITH THE CHOCTAW, 1816. 187 Horoyeahoummar, his x mark, [L. S.] Hopoyeahoummar, jr., hisxmark, [L. s.l Immouklusharhopoyea, his X Immouklusharhopyea, his x mark, ( L. s. mark, (L. S,] James Colbert, his x mark, (L. s. Hopoyeahoullarter, his x mark, (L. S,] Coweamarthtar, his x mark, [L. s. Tushkarhopoyea, his x mark, [L. S.] Illachouwarhopoyea, his x mark, [L. s. Witness: ,James Gadsden, secretary, William Cocke, . ,John Rhea, Malcum McGee, James Colbert, interpreter. TREATY WITH THE CHOCTAW, 1816 . .-· .A. treaty of cess-vm beflween the United States of America and the Oct. 24. 1816. Ohactaw nat-ion of Indians. -7-Sta-t-.,-1r,-2_--- Proclamation, Dec. 30 1816 JAMES MADISON, president of the United State~ of America, by gen- ' " eral John Coffee, John Rhea, and J oho M'Kee, esquires, commissioners on the part of the United States_, duly authorized for that {>Urpose, on the one part, and the mingoes, leaders, captains, and wan-1ors, of the Chactaw nation, in general council assembled, in behalf of themselves and the whole nation, on the other part, have entered into the fol1owing articles, which, when ratified by the president of the United States, with. the advice and consent of the senate, shall be obligatory on both parties: ART. 1. The Chactaw nation, for the consideration hereafter men- CessiOJJ. tioned, cede to the United Staoos all theirtitleandclaim to lands lying east of the following boundary, be~inning at the mouth of Ooktibbuha, the Chickasaw bounclary, and runnmg from thence down the Tombigby river, until it intersects the northern boundary of a cession made to the United States by the Chactaws, at Mount Dexter, on the 16th November, 1805.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Historical Quarterly, Vol. 9, Issue 1
    Florida Historical Quarterly Volume 9 Issue 1 Florida Historical Quarterly, Vol 9, Issue Article 1 1 2020 Florida Historical Quarterly, Vol. 9, Issue 1 Florida Historical Society [email protected] Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/fhq University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Full Issue is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Florida Historical Quarterly by an authorized editor of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Recommended Citation Society, Florida Historical (2020) "Florida Historical Quarterly, Vol. 9, Issue 1," Florida Historical Quarterly: Vol. 9 : Iss. 1 , Article 1. Available at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/fhq/vol9/iss1/1 Society: Florida Historical Quarterly, Vol. 9, Issue 1 Published by STARS, 2020 1 Florida Historical Quarterly, Vol. 9 [2020], Iss. 1, Art. 1 https://stars.library.ucf.edu/fhq/vol9/iss1/1 2 Society: Florida Historical Quarterly, Vol. 9, Issue 1 VOLUME IX JULY, 1930 NUMBER 1 The QUARTERLY Periodical of THE FLORIDA HISTORICAL SOCIETY JULIEN C. YONGE, Editor EMMA ROCHELLE PORTER Pensacola Assistant Editor, Jacksonville CONTENTS United States Troops in Spanish East Florida, 1812- 1813 T. FREDERICK DAVIS East Florida in the American Revolution, 1775-1778 EDGAR LEGARE PENNINGTON Bernard Romans’s Map of Florida Engraved by Paul Revere, and Other Early Maps in the Library of The Florida Historical Society A. F. HARLEY Book Review : Loyalists in East Florida, 1774 to 1785, By Wilbur H. Siebert KATHRYN T. ABBEY New Members Donations. SUBSCRIPTION TWO DOLLARS. SINGLE COPIES FIFTY CENTS.
    [Show full text]
  • Annals of Augusta County, Virginia
    r AMALS OF AUGUSTA -UNTY , YIRGIUIA by Jos, A, Y/addell 9^5-591 ANNALS Augusta County, Virginia JOS. A. WADDELL. SUPPLKIVIENT. J. W. RANDOLPH & ENGLISH, Publishers, RICHMOND, VA. 1888. PRKKACK. The chief object of this Supplement is to preserve some ac- count of many pioneer settlers of Augusta county and their immediate descendants. It would be impossible, within any reasonable limits, to include the existing generation, and hence the names of living persons are generally omitted. The writer regrets that he cannot present here sketches of other ancient and worthy families, such as the Andersons, Christians, Hamiltons, Kerrs, McPheeterses, Millers, Pattersons, Pilsons, Walkers, etc. The genealogies of several of the oldest and most distinguished families— Lewis, Preston, Houston, etc. —are omitted, because they are given fully in other publications. For much valuable assistance the writer is indebted to Jacob Fuller, Esq. , Librarian of Washington and Lee University, and especially to Miss Alice Trimble, of New Vienna, Ohio. J. A. W. Staunton, Va., March, 1888. 166310 CONTKNTS. Early Records of Orange County Court 381 The Rev. John Craig and His Times 388 Gabriel Jones, the King's Attorney 392 The Campbells . , , 396 The Bordens, McDowells and McClungs 398 The Browns 400 Mrs. Floyd's Narrative 401 The Floyds 404 The Logans 404 Colonel William Flipming 406 The Estills 407 Colonel William Whitley 408 The Moffetts 408 The Aliens 410 The Trimbles 411 Fort Defiance 413 The Smiths 413 The Harrisons, of Rockingham 415 The Alexanders and Wilsons 416 The Raid upon the Wilson Family 417 The Robertsons 420 Treaties with Indians 421 The McKees 422 The Crawfords.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume XVI October, 1937 Number 2
    Florida Historical Quarterly Volume 16 Issue 2 Florida Historical Quarterly, Vol 16, Article 1 Issue 2 1937 Florida Historical Quarterly, Vol. 16, Issue 2 Florida Historical Society [email protected] Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/fhq University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Full Issue is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Florida Historical Quarterly by an authorized editor of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Recommended Citation Society, Florida Historical (1937) "Florida Historical Quarterly, Vol. 16, Issue 2," Florida Historical Quarterly: Vol. 16 : Iss. 2 , Article 1. Available at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/fhq/vol16/iss2/1 Society: Florida Historical Quarterly, Vol. 16, Issue 2 Volume XVI October, 1937 Number 2 The FLORIDA HISTORICAL QUARTERLY CONTENTS Events at Prospect Bluff on the Apalachicola River, 1808-1818 Mark F. Boyd The St. Joseph Convention (continued) F. W. Hoskins The St. Augustine Historical Restoration Eleanor Beeson A Union Catalog of Floridiana Alfred Masbrouck Comments on the Delgado Papers John R. Swanton The Panton, Leslie Papers: John McKee to James Innerarity, 1811 Notes The Florida Historical Society: The library fund Report of the librarian The annual meeting List of members Published quarterly by THE FLORIDA HISTORICAL SOCIETY Rose Building, Tallahassee SUBSCRIPTION TWO DOLLARS. SINGLE COPIES FIFTY CENTS. (Copyright. 1937, by the Florida Historical Society. Entered second-class matter November 13, 1933 at the post office Florida. under the Act of August 24, 1912.) Published by STARS, 1937 1 Florida Historical Quarterly, Vol.
    [Show full text]