CENSUS OF 2001

SERIES 31

GOA

PROVISIONAL POPULATION TOTALS

Paper-2 of 2001 RURAL.:.URBAN DISTRIBUTION

P. R. BU'MB Of Indian Administrative Service Director of Census Operations, . CONTENTS

Pages I. STATE HIGHLIGHTS - 2001 CENSUS IX

II. FIGURES AT A GLANCE xi

III. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT XIII

IV. INTRODUCTORY NOTE 1

Rural - Urban Classification 2

Urban Agglomeration 4

V. ANAL YSIS OF RESULTS 7

Rural - Urban Distribution of Population 7

Trends of Urbanization in India 10

Trends of Urbanization in Goa 11

Statutory and Non-Statutory towns 15

Distribution of Urban Population by size class of Towns 16

Rural Population 17

Sex. Ratio 21

Literacy 27

VI. STATEMENTS

1. Rural-Urban Distribution of population, India 7 and States/Union Territories: 2001. , 2. Trend of urbanisation in India. 1901-2001. 11 3. Trend of urbanisation in Goa 1950-2001. 12 4. Trend of urbanisation in the districts of Goa 13 1950-2001. 5. Percentage of urban population in the talukas, 2001. 14 6. Number of Towns in Goa 1991 and 2001. 15 7. Distribution of T owns/Urban Agglomerations and of 16 urban population by size class of Towns in 2001. 8. Progress in rural population, India 1901-2001. 18 9. Progress in rural population, Goa, 1950-2001. 19 10. Progress in rural population in the districts of . 20 Goa, 1950-2001. 11. Sex ratio, India, 1901-2001. 21 12. Sex ratio, Goa, 1900-2001. 22 13. Sex Ratio by residence, 1991-2001. 22 14. Town-wise sex ratio, 2001. 24 15. Sex ratio of child population in the age-group 25 0-6 years 1991 and 2001. 16. Number of literates and illiterates among 27 population aged 7 years and above and their change, India: 1991 and 2001.

17. Number of literates and illiterates in the population 28 aged 7 years and above in the State and Districts of Goa, 1991 and 2001. 18. Literacy rates by residence for the State and 29 districts, 2001. 19,- Literacy rates in the towns of the State, 2001. 30

VII. CHARTS AND MAP'S 33

1. India -: Administrative Divisions - 2001 v 2. Goa - Administrative Divisions - 2001 vii 3. Urban population, 2001. 35 4. Towns/Urban Agglomerations by size-class, 2001. 37 5. Jnter-censal change in urban population, 1991-2001. 39 6. Growth of UA I Class I urban centres, 1991-2001. 41 7. Inter-censal change in rural population, 1991-2001. 43 8. Distribution of rural-urban population in districts-2001. 45 9. Distribution of rural-urban population, 1950-2001. 47 10. Percentage Decadal growth in urban population 47 1950-2001. 11. Distribution of population of UAs/CitieslT own 49 in different size-classes, class I to class VI in different Census years, 1950-2001.

II VIII. TABLES AND APPENDICES 51

1. Population, child population in the age-group 53 0-6 and literates by residence and sex, States, Districts, U.A./CityfTown, 2001. 2. Population, child population in the age-group 56 0-6 and literates by residence and sex, State, District, Taluka etc. 2001. 3. Percentage decadal growth, percentage of 58 child population in the age-group 0-6 by residence and percentage of urban population to total population, State and Districts, 2001. 4. Sex ratio of population and sex ratio of child 59 population in the age-group 0-6, State, District, Taluka etc., 2001. 5. Literacy rate by residence and sex, 60 State, District, Taluka, 2001.

6. Population, percentage decadal growth 61 1991-2001, Sex ratio, literacy by sex, UAs/Cities/Towns by size-class in the State, 2001.

Appendix-1 to Table - 6 - Population, 64 child population in the age-group 0-6 and literates by sex, Independent Cities and T owns arranged in alphabetical order, 2001. Appendix-2 to Table - 6 - List of Towns 66 of 1991 declassified in 2001 and Towns of 1991 merged with other Towns in 2001. 7. Growth of urban population, 1981-2001. 67

III

CENSUS OF INDIA 2001 MAP -1 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY --·r-.' :J6' [ INDIA ADMINISTRATIVE DIVISIONS 2001

Boundary,lntemabonai ___ Qoundary, statefurs ___

KilOMETRES ..l , 00 ·50 0 100 200 300 ~oo 500

I j_ N A I ·r MYANMAR I (BURMA) I 11)0

MAIiARASHTRA BAY OF BENGAL ARA!'At-I ANCHIVI PAACESH 16· ~EA

00;.

Coal 10. (_) I I'" ,. ~ .' N.,..,ndoI11l. (Indl') ~: 12" \ ,.. I. (lndi.) lZ 0 s ~:, B."~n (' 'Y.,. .. II' r,...-S- -:;.~. dY." ANDAMA.'I SEA\ -t:-., " c)

Based upon 8U1vey of India map with the permission of the Surveyor General of India. © Government of India copyright. 2001, The territorial waters of India extend into the sea to a distance of twelve nautical Miles measured from the appropriate base line.

The interstate boundaries between Arunachal Pradesh, Assam and Meghalaya shown on this map are as interpreted from the North-Eastern Areas (Reorganisation) Act, 1971 but have yetta be verified,

MAP-2

15' GOA ADMINISTRATIVE DIVISIONS 2001

45' 45'

Mapuso• IBardez) v).

I \ \ _..... i ~;.~· ... T H \ , G o A " I 30' - ~'; , o 30 I } .(l " (Satan) () .', .. :_" .. \.

-'., o \ Az \ OSanguem j"'-.,,-.j

15' @ 15' A R A B I A N () \:' ._ S E A \ \ I ./ G . 0 A ~ < ~ ; o· 15° STATE CAPITAL ... n QCanacona DISTRICT HEADOUARTERS .. @ SUB·DIVISION HEADQUARTERS ... • TALUKA HEADQUARTERS ...... 0 KILOMETRES 5 0 10 15 II II I I I I

BOUNDARIES: ST,o.TE DISTRICT SUB· DIVISIONAL ...... TALUKA ______Where the name of Taluka differs from its headquarters, the former has been written within brackets

ANJADIP ISLAND ~ • (GOA)

73° 45' EAST OF GREENWICH 15'

Based upon Survey of India map with the permission of the Surveyor General of India. © Government of India copyright. 2001 The territorial waters of India extend into the sea to a distance of twelve nautical miles measured from the appropriate base line

STATE HIGHLIGHTS - 2001 CENSUS

1. About fifty per cent (exactly 49.77 per cent) of the total population of the State live in urban areas.

2. Average size of population of inhabited village is 1946.

3. Average size of population of urban unit is 15,202.

4. Urban Agglomeration has achieved the status of the first city of Goa and is classified as class I town having population of one lakh and above.

5. Mormugao Urban Agglomeration covers 15.65 per cent of the total urban population of the State.

6, Out of 100 persons living in urban areas 57 are living in 14 Municipal council areas in the State,

7. Least urban population is' found in Satari taluka of North 'Goa dfstrict (7913).

8. Highest sex ratio is found iii Salcete taluka rural (1067) of whereas the lowest sex ratio is found in taluka rural (941) of .

9. Among the urban units of the State the highest sex ratio is found in Census Town (1155) of North Goa district and lowest sex ratio is found in Bambolim Census Town (558) als'o located in North Goa district.

10. Net addition in population in the State during the last decade (1991-2001) is 1,74,205 whereas net addition in literates is 2,09,766 ..

11. The most populated taluka is Salcete (2,59,787) of South Goa district and the le~st populated taluka is (43,712) also ofSouth Goa district.

12. The highest rural population of the taluka is found in Salcete (1,08,217) of South Goa district and lowest rural population is found in Canacona (32,012) of the same district.

IX 13. The maximum number of towns are located in North Goa district (27).

14. Among the talukas, the of North Goa district is having the maximum number of towns (11).

15. Both the districts have equal number of Municipal Councils (7).

16. Number of Census Towns are more in North Goa district (20) as compared to South Goa district (10).

17. Among the talukas, Bardez in North Goa is the highly literate taluka (86.49 per cent) where as Canacona in South Goa district is the least literate taluka (67.70 per cent) FIGURES AT A GLANCE

GOA NORTH GOA SOUTH GOA

1. Population 1343998 757407 586591 Persons 685617 388116 297501 Males 658381 369291 289090 Females

2. Decadal Growth rate 1991- 2001 Absolute + 174205 92603 + 81602

Percentage + 14.89 + 13.93 + 16.16

3. Area (Sq. Km.) 3,702 1,736 1,966

4. Density of Population 363 436 298 (per sq, km.)

5. Sex ratio (No. of females 960 951 972 per 1000 males)

6. No. of Literates aged 7 and above. 989362 571861 417501 Persons 544006 315344 228662 Males 445356 256517 1SBa39 Females

7. Literacy rate (%) (excluding population 0-6)

Persons 82.32 84.12 79.98

Males 88.88 90.63 86.58

Females 75.51 77.29 73.22

8. Urban Populati,pn 668,869 340,233 328,636

XI 9. Percentage of Urban Population to the 49.77 44.92 56.02 Total Population

10. Decadal growth rate of Urban Population 1991-2001

Absolute 189117 114629 84486

Percentage + 39.42 + 50.81 + 29.31

11. No. of Villages 359 213 146 Total 347 209 138 Inhabited 8 2 6 Uninhabited 4 2 2 Submerged

12. No. of Towns 44 27 17 Total 14 7 7 Municipal Towns 30 20 10 Census Towns

13. No. of Urban Agglomerations/Towns 38 24 14

14. No. of Urban Agglomerations 3 1 2

xii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

Census count is essentially a cooperative exercise and as such the success of this massive operation was due to the cooperation and the hard work put in by all those involved in this great National Task including the people of Goa who had extended their utmost cooperation by furnishing the requisite information to the Census Enumerators and Supervisors who had called on them during the enumeration period. We would, therefore, like to place on record. our sincere appreciation of the commendable work done by all the administrative hierarchies viz. The District Collectors, Addl. Collectors, Dy. Collectors, Mamlatdars, Joint Mamlatdars, Special Charge Officers (for Military and Naval areas and sea population) and also those who worked as Supervisors and Enumerators.

Since the Census Operations are essentially carried out with the help of State Government, We have great pleasure in placing on record the excellent cooperation and help received from the State Government for the smooth and successful conduct of the Census in the State of Goa. We would like to express our gratitude to Shri. Ashok Nath, I.A.S., former Chief Secretary and Shri Bateshwar Rai, I.A.S., present Chief secretary, Government of Goa for all the assistance rendered to us from time to time. Our special thanks are due to Dr. K.S.R.V.S. Chalam, Director of Planning, Statistics and Evaluation who had readily spared some of his officers/officials to work as Master Trainers for the imparting training to the Supervisors and Enumerators. We are also thankful to Shri. S .. S. Kolvekar, Joint Director of Planning, Statistics & Evaluations who was the Nodal Officer for Census of India 2001 in this State.

The success of the census in terms of cent per cent coverage as also accuracy depends largely on spreading the census message to every nook and corner. It is indeed a matter of great satisfaction that the pUblicity measures undertaken during the census of India 2001 in this State had made the task of the census enumerators and supervisors much easier since most of the people in Goa were aware of the on going census and were eagerly awaiting the arrival of the census enumerators. The Goa Doordarshan Kendra, All India Radio, Press Information Bureau, Directorate of Information of Government of Goa and Press in particular had cooperated with us in full measure in spreading the census message to the people of the State. We had also requested the Archbishop Patriarch in Goa to request all the Parish Priests to announce after the Sunday mass the census message ~nd solicit public cooperation. These measures, inter alia, were very effective particularly in the rural areas. We would I[ke to express our grateful thanks to each' one of them including Panchayats and Municipal Councils for the keen interest they have shown in our publicity campaigns and for all the help rendered to us from time to time.

We are also grateful to Hon'ble Chief Minister of Goa Shri Manohar Parrikar, who requested the people of Goa to extend their fullest cooperation and to provide complete and correct information to the census enumerators through the message .he gave on the eve of the commencement of the census enumeration.

All the officials in Directorate of Census Operations had put in their best efforts and worked very hard to ensure that the Census was carried out

xiii successfully. To all of them our thanks are due. Special thanks to Shri S.P. Desai, the then Deputy Director of Census Operations and Smt. Mala D. Kamat, Assistant Director of Census Operations who worked very hard during the actual census enumeration.

We will be failing in our duty if we do not record our gratitude to Shri. J. K . Banthia of the Indian Administrative Service, Registrar General and Census Commissioner, India and his colleagues for the constant support and valuable guidance at all stages of this massive operations. Our special thanks to Shri S.P. Sharma, Consultant who visited Goa during actual census enumeration and provided on the spot guidance.

xiv INTRODUCTORY NOTE

The Census of India 2001 was conducted during the period from 9th February to 28th February 2001 with the reference date as 00.00 hours of 1st March 2001. To bring the population up-to-date with reference to the census moment and the reference date of 00.00 hours of 1st March 2001, a Revisional Round was undertaken between 1st to 5th March 2001. The Houseless Population was enumerated on the night of 28th February 2001.

The Population Enumeration all over the country (excluding Jammu & Kashmir and certain snow bound areas of Himachal Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh) was completed on 5th March 2001 and the Provisional Population results for the total population, population in age-group 0-6 and literate population by sex for India, States and Union Territories were released on 23rd March 2001 with the publication of Paper-1 of 2001. The Provisional Population Totals for Goa State were released on 4th April, 2001, with the publication of Paper 1 of 2001. These provisional figures were based on quick tabulation of the totals compiled by the enumerators immediately on completion of the field work.

The Paper-1 of 2001 Census for Goa released on 4th April 2001, contained the following information in the form of four tables:

Table-1 Population distribution, percentage decadal growth rate, sex ratio and population density.

Table-2 Percentage decadal variation in population since 1900 for State and Districts.

Table-3 Sex ratio since 1900 for States and Districts.

Table-4 Population in the age-group 0-6, number of literates and literacy rates for State and Districts.

The provisional population totals, population distribution, percentage decadal growth, sex ratio, population density and literacy rate for the country and States and Union Territories are also presented in Paper-1 of 2001.

The present publication is in continuation of Paper-1 and furnishes information on population, population in the age-group 0-6 and literate population by sex down to the taluka and town level with rural and urban break up of data for the talukas. In addition, this paper also presents data relating to urbanization, indicating the number of towns and Urban Agglomerations and the changes that have occurred during the decade 1991-2001, the growth of urban population, the towns and their classification by size class and the differential rate of growth for rural and urban areas. The Paper-2 of 2001 contains the following Tables:-

Table-1 Population, Child population in the age-group 0-6 and literates by residence and sex - State/DistrictlU.A.lCitylTown, 2001. Table-2 Population, Child population in the age-group 0-6 and literates by residence and sex - StatelDistrictlTaluka etc., 2001.

Table-3 Percentage decadal growth, percentage of child population in the age-group 0-6 by residence and percentage of urban population to total population - State and District, 2001.

Table-4 Sex ratio of population and sex ratio of child population in the age­ group 0-6 - State, District - Talukas etc. 2001.

Table-5 Literacy rate by residence and sex, - State/District/Taluka, 2001.

Table-6 Population, percentage decadal growth 1991 - 2001, sex ratio, literacy by sex - U.As, Cities and Towns by size class in the State 2001.

Appendix 1 to Table-6 Population, Child population in the age-group 0-6 and literate by sex - independent cities and towns arranged in alphabetical order 2001.

Appendix 2 to Table-6 List of towns of 1991 declassified in 2001 and towns of 1991 merged with other towns in 2001.

Table-7 Growth of Urban Population, 1981-2001.

Rural-Urban classification:

It has been a tradition of the Indian Census to present data for rural and urban areas separately. To distinguish between rural and urban areas, the practice was to first decide the urban areas and treat the remaining as the rural area. The urban frame consists of towns and urban agglomerations. The definition of the town as adopted in 1991 Census is retained in 2001 Census and is as follows:

a) All places with a municipality, corporation, cantonment board or notified town area committee etc.

b) All other places which satisfied the following criteria:-

i) a minimum population of 5000.

ii) at least 75 per cent of the male working population engaged in non-agricultural pursuits; and;

iii) a density of population of at least 400 per sq. Km. (1000 per sq. mile).

2 The places which satisfied the criteria as laid down in (a) above are referred to as Statutory Towns since by virtue of statutory notification they are urban and the places which were not Statutory Towns but which satisfied the demographic criteria laid down in (b) above are treated as Non-statutory Towns or Census Towns.

Apart from these, there are some places referred as outgrowth to few towns which have also been treated as urban, as explained later under topic of Urban Agglomeration.

On the basis of the above definition of town, 44 places in Goa have been classified as towns for the purpose of 2001 Census. Of these 44 towns, 14 are Statutory Towns (Municipal towns) and 30 are Non-statutory towns (census towns). These are listed below by Talukas and Districts.

List of Towns in the State - 2001 Census

I District Taluka Town 1 2 3 NORTH GOA Pernem 1. Pernem (MCI) 2. (CT)

Bardez 3. (CT) 4. (CT) 5. (MCI) 6. (CT) 7. (CT) 8. (CT) 9. (CT) 10. Reis-Magos (CT) 11. Penha-de-Franca (CT) 12. Socorro (Serula) (CT) I 13. Aldona (CT) Tiswadi 14. (CT) 15. Panaji (MCI) 16. Calapor (CT) 17. 8ambolim (CT) 18. (CT)

Bicholim 19. (MCI) 20. Carapur (CT) 21. Sanquelim (MCI) 22. Pale (CT)

3 1 3 I ~atari 123. Valpoi (Mel) I Ponda 24. Bandora (CT) I I 25. Queu/a (CT) 26. Ponda (MCI) 27. Curti (CT) SOUTH GOA Mormugao 1. Mormugao (MCI) 2. (CT) 3. Sancoale (CT)

t Salcete 4. Margao (MCI) 5. (CT) 6. (CT) I 7. (CT) 8. (CT) 9. Oavorlim (CT) 10. Sao-jose-de-Areal (CT) 11. (CT) 12. (MCI)

1--.: - 13. -Cacora (MCI) , 14. Quepem (MCI)

Sanguem 15. (CT) 16. (Mel)

Canacona 17. Canacona (MCI)

----

Note:- Towns created after the 1991 Census for the first time have been shown in Italics.

MCI Municipal Council. CT Census Town

All areas which are not urban are - by definition - rural. The basic unit of rural areas is the revenue village which has definite surveyed boundaries. The revenue village may comprise several hamlets but the entire village has been treated as one rural unit

Urban Agglomeration:

The concept of Urban Agglomeration introduced in 1971 Census was retained for the 1981 and 1991 Censuses and also continued for the 2001 Census. According to this concept, an Urban Agglomeration is a continuous urban spread constituting a town and its adjoining urban outgrowths (OGs), or two or more physically contiguous towns together with the continuous and well recognized urban outgrowths, if any, of such towns. In some cases railway

4 colonies, unjversity campus, port areas, military camps, etc. would have come up near a city or statutory town outside its statutory limits but within the revenue limits of a village.' or villages continuous to the Town. Each such individual area by itself may not satisfy the minimum population limit to qualify to be treated as an independent urban unit but may deserve to be clubbed with the towns as a contin.uous urban spread. An Urban Agglomeration may constitute:-

i) a city or a town with a continuous outgrowth being outside the statutory limits but falling within the boundaries of the adjoining village or villages; or ii) two or more adjoining towns with their outgrowths; if any, as in (i) above; or iii) a city and one or more adjoining towns with or without outgrowths all of which form a continuous spread.

There are three Urban Agglomerations in Goa in 1991 Census viz. Panaji, Mormugao and Margao. These three Urban Agglomerations are continued in 2001 Census. The constituent units of these three Urban Agglomerations are as under:-

1. Panaji Urban Agglomeration:

Constituent Units

i) Panaji Mumcipal Council ii) Panelim (Out growth) iii) Morambi-o-grande (Merces) (Out growth) iv) Renovadi (Out growth) v) Morambi-o-Pequeino (Merces) (Out growth) vi) Cujira (Out growth) vii) Murda (Out growth) viii) Chimbel (Census Town) ix) Calapor (Census Town) x) Bambolim (Census Town)

2. Mormugao Urban Agglomeration:

Constituent Units

i) Mormugao Municipal Council ii) Chicalim (Census Town)

3. Margao Urgan Agglomeration: 4. Constituent Units

i) Margao Municipal Council ii) Aquem (Census Town) iii) Navelim (Census Town) It may be mentioned that there is a slight change in the constituent units of the Panaji Urban Agglomeration after the 1991 Census. The two constituent units i.e. Taleigao (CT) and Durgavado (G. G.) have been merged in the jurisdiction of the Panaji Municipal Council after the 1991 Census. It is therefore, these two places which figured in 1991 Census do not appear in the list of constituent units of Panaji Urban Agglomeration for the 2001 Census.

It is also mentioned that, 3 places viz. Jua (North Goa District), Raia and (both of South Goa District), which were treated as Census Towns and included in the urban frame for the 1991 Census are now no longer classified as Census Towns for the urban frame of 2001 Census. This is because they do not satisfy the empirical test, hence they are now included in the rural frame. ANALYSIS OF RESULTS

Rural-Urban Distribution of Population:

The provisional population figures of the Census of India 2001 have revealed that out of the total population 13,43,998 of Goa State, 6,75,129 were residing in rural areas and the remaining 6,68,869 in urban areas. In terms of percentage a little less than 50 per cent, to be exact 49.77 per cent, are urban dwellers and 50.23 per cent are rural dwellers. For the country as a whole of the total population 1,027,015,247 in 2001 Census, 741,660,293 (or 72.22 per cent) persons were enumerated in rural areas and 285.354,954 (or 27.78 per cent) in urban areas. Thus, it may be seen that the percentage of urban dwellers in Goa is quite high as compared to the country's average of about 28 per cent. Statement No. 1 presents rural-urban distribution of population-India. States and Union Territories. 2001.

Statement - 1

Rural - Urban Distribution of Population - India and States/Union Territories: 2001

27281161 263876 I 11325934 33.95 7543083 -- 3782851 -~-~~~ ----- 392690 89.78 -- 35281 -~~- ___ _l_57 409 t~_

7 I 1 2 I 3 I 4 5 6· 7 I T 8479562 4316401-~4163161·-- --~~~EI- 25.59J 5. Uttaranchal ~- R 63093~1l_r-_~143380 3165937 .~ U 2170245 1173021 997224 J T 21082989 11327658 9755331 29.00 I 6. Haryana R 14968850 8017622 6951228 -]I U 6114139 3310036 2804103 --- T 13782976 7570890 6212086 93.01 ! -1 7. Delhi* R 963215 533219 429996 U 12819761 7037671 5782090 T 56473122 29381657 27091465 23.38 8. Rajasthan R 43267678 22394479 20873199 - U 13205444 6987178 6218266 T 166052859 87466301 78586558 20.78 9. Uttar Pradesh R 131540230 69096765 62443465 U 34512629 18369536 16143093

T 82878796 43153964 39724832 10.47-- 10. Bihar R 74199596 38510686 35688910 U 8679200 4643278 4035922 T 540493 288217 252276 11.10 11. Sikkim R 480488 255386 225102 U 60005 32831 27174 T 1091117 573951 517166 Arunachal 12. R 868429 453560 414869 Pradesh U 222688 120391 102297 T 1988636 1041686 946950 17.74 13. Nagaland R 1635815 846651 789164 -~1 I U 352821 195035 157786 T 2388634 1207338 1181296 23.88' -~ 14. Manipur R 1818224 923428 894796 U 570410 283910 286500 T 891058 459783 431275 49.50 15. Mizoram R 450018 233718 216300 U 441040 226065 214975 T 3191168 1636138 1555030 17.02 16. Tripura R 2648074 1359288 1288786 U 543094 276850 266244 T 2306069 1167840 1138229 19.63 17. Meghalaya R 1853457 939803 913654 U 452612 228037 224575 T 26638407 13787799 12850608 12.72 18. Assam R 23248994 11983157 11265837 -- U 3389413 1804642 1584771 I T 80221171 41487694 38733477 28.03 19. West Bengal R 57734690 29606028 28128662 U 22486481 11881666 10604815

8 i--1-T~~~-2-~------~:-3-1---4 i 5 ,~~,--- -6- -T~-7~-1

2 1 ;- i ~;:rk~an~- - ~r-- - -~1~~i~1-~!ig~H t i~!r~ I·.~.~ I ~1. i~ri:sa--- -r~-· --;!~il Jm~!i$~~!1rm ._~~7j I--~------~--- __I __ ~_I-20795956r- 10452426 103435301-20.08 I 11,_,_2__ ~_ I Chhatisgarh B_~+--16620627 8290983 8329644 --;ll-;:: " -t- U, 4175329 2161443 2013886 , ------+--T----T 60385118 31456873 28928245 26.67

I 23 Madhya R I 44282528 22975256 21307272 i I . Pradesh -u--T-- 16102590 8481617 7620973 r-~--- T i - 50596992 26344053 24252-9-3-9-+--3-7-.3-5-j 124. I Gujarat ~---r-----~31697615 16289423 _~ 154081921 ~ l 1 U, 18899377 10054630 8844747 i III T 158059 92478 65581 36.2_E?J i 25. Daman & Diu* R 100740 63576 37164 --~ 'i~------+---~----- U , 57319 28902 28417 I ~ I...... IT 220451 121731 98720' 22.89~ 26 I Dadra & IR I' 169995 91887 \ 78108 J 1I • I Nagar Haveli* Iu , 50456 29844! 20612 I 42.40 r 1 ItT =t -= 96752247 50334270 I 46417977 -_ 127. I B____ 557325S 28443238 27289275

I 1 U 41019734 21891032 19128702 --- i----r---- I T 96752247 50334270 46417977 42.40 I 28. ,I ~nddhra,h .. ~ 55732513 28443238' 27289275 I I ra es U -r--- 41019734 21891032 19128702 __j t~-' -r------T - 52733958 26856343r--258776151-33~~?j 129. I Karn, ataka I ~ 134814100 -: 17618593 1719SSoT_J : + ro-----+==17919858, 9237750 8682108 i r ------IT -, ," 13439~ 685617 f---- 658381 49.771 ' 30. I Goa R -----f---- __§__Z_5129 1_____ 33962§~r----_ 335503 J ! U 668869 345991 322878 I r-----I ~------+-~------+--,------j i LJ 60595 31118 29477 44.47 131. Lakshadweep* LR 33647 17196 __1_6_4_5_1 +---- __----1 I U 26948 13922 13026 ! T 31838619 15468664 16369955 25.97 32. Kerala ~ 23571484 11450785 12120699 J1 Iu 8267135 4017879+---4--24-9-2-5--6--+-----l I liT _62110839 31268654 30842185 43.86 i 33. I Tamil Nadu ~~ I 34869286 17508985 17360301 I

I 1 U 27241553 13759669 13481884 I I - T- 973829 486705 487124 66.57 I Pondicherry* I f3__----L, 325596 163586 1c:--:6_2_0_1,--0-:-+-___---1 L__I _~ ______[L.J ____ 1 648233 i 323119 325114

q i 1 2 3 i Andaman & I--:__1" 35. Nicobar R l Islands* n ,,"

Notes: 1. The total, rural and urban population of India includes the estimated total, rural and urban population of entire Kachchh District, Morvi, Maliya­ Miyana and Wankaner talukas of Rajkot District, Jodiya taluka of Jamnagar District of Gujarat State and estimated total and rural population of entire Kinnaure District of Himanchal Pradesh where population enumeration of Census of India, 2001 could not be conducted due to natural calamities.

2. The figures of total, rural and urban population of Himachal Pradesh State have been arrived at after including the estimated total and rural population of entire Kinnaur District where population enumeration of Census of India, 2001 could not be conducted due to natural calamity.

3. The figures of total, rural and urban population of Gujarat State have been arrived at after including the estimated total, rural and urban population of emire Kachchh District, Morvi, Maliya-Miyana and Wankaner talukas of Rajkot District, Jodiya taluka of Jamnagar District where population enumeration of the Census of India, 2001 could not be conducted due to natural calamity.

The Census of India 2001 has also revealed that Goa with 49.77 per cent urban population occupies the first place among the States of India. However, among all the States and Union Territories, Goa occupies fourth place. The first three places are occupied by the Union Territories of Delhi (93.01 per cent), Chandigarh (89.78 per cent) and Pondicherry (66.57 per cent). Himachal Pradesh with 9.79 per cent is the least urbanized State of our country. It is preceded by Bihar (10.47 percent) Sikkim (11.10 per cent) and Assam (12.72 per cent). In our neighbouring States of Maharashtra and 42.40 per cent and 33.98 per cent respectively of their total population are urban dwellers.

Trend of urbanization in India

It is common knowledge that a large population of our country lives in villages. However, there is a steady increase in the percentage of population living in urban areas in the country. This can be verified from the figures presented in below given statement.

10 Statement -2

Trend of urbanization in India 1901-2001

--Census---I--- Total Urban I Urban Decad~~I;l Year Population Population I Population as Growth of I percentage of I urban I total Population Population I t f9~1 -T---;38~~~,~;r- 25~854,9~=--=-~c&s----1------_-~ L -T91~_?52-,-()93,390 I 25,948,431 10.29 00.36 ] I 1921T-- 251,321,2131 28,091,299 11.18 08.26 ~ f· -l~~~ ... +_. ;~~:~~~:~~~ t·~ ~~:~~~:~~~ 1--- ~;:~~---- i---~:~~ --I f------t------+------t------~---; I 1951 i 361,088,090 62,443,709 I 17.29 I 41.40 ! r~-~~-~ -T=--~~~:~I~:;}+--1~~:~~~:~~~t-~- ~~~~r--t=1~~~ ---1 i;~=f~81_=~_~~==§83, 32 9,09 7 t-159:462,54_7--T----~ __ ?_3.-:}4 - n_~+- --46.14 . -1 _ 1~~1 __+-_f!4.§,302,688 -I--__21L_611 ,01H--- 25.71 I 36.47__ _j 1___ 200 1_j. __ 1 ,027,015,24 7 L __ ~_5_,~54.:.9?·tt=-____1I_.Z_fL__.l___ 31.13 i

Note: 1. As the 1981 Census was not conducted in Assam, the 1981 population figures for India include interpolated figures for Assam.

2. The 1991 Census was not held in Jammu & Kashmir. The 1991 population figures for India include figures for Jammu & Kashmir as projected by the Standing Committee of experts on Population Projections (October, 1989).

It will be seen that the percentage of population residing in urban areas has increased from 10.85 per cent in 1901 to 27.78 per cent in 2001. So far as growth of urban population is concerned, decade 1971-81 has witnessed the highest growth of urban population being 46.14 per cent. In the next decade it has come down to 36.47 per cent and stood at 31.13 per cent during 1991-2001.

Trend of urbanization in Goa

It may be noted that though there were towns in Goa prior to 1950, no separate data on urban population is available. Hence, the pace of urbanization in respect of Goa could be examined for the period between 1950-2001. Figures presented in below given statement indicate the trend of urbanization in Goa.

11 Statement-3

Trend of urbanization in Goa 1950-2001.

In 1950, there were 5 towns or urban localities having a population of 70,931 constituti ng about 13 per cent of the total population of the State. The State's urban population increased to 87,329 or about 15 per cent of the total population when six new towns were added in 1960. During the decade 1960-71 a tremendous increase in the urban population of the State was recorded increasing the population from 87,329 in 1960 to 203,243 in 1971. In all 1,15,914 persons were added in Goa's urban population between the period 1960-71, thereby increasing the percentage of urban dwellers from 14.80 per cent in 1960 to 25.56 per cent in 1971. Even the growth of urban population was at the peak being 132.73 per cent during this period. The sudden increase in the State urban population obviously attributed to the liberation of Goa in 1961, which opened the State's frontiers to the rest of the country and resulted in heavy in-migration of the labour force. Further, the State urban population also increased to a certain extent on account of the formation of the Urban Agglomeration of Panaji and Margao in 1971 Census. A fast rate of urbanization (58.82 per cent) was recorded during the next decade 1971-81 also. In 1991 the urban population increased to 479,752 or at the decadal rate of 48.63 per cent. The proportion of population living in urban areas has shot up from 32.03 in 1981 to 41.01 per cent in 1991. The increase in the urban population during this decade may be attributed also to the fact that the number of towns has more than doubled from 15 in 1981 to 31 in 1991. In 2001, Goa's urban population stood at 668,869. Thus there is a net increase of 189,117 in urban dwellers during the period 1991- 2001. The growth of urban population during this period works out to 39.42 per cent. It is mentioned that, the State has witnessed highest increase (i.e. 189,117) in its urban population during 1991-2001 as compared to earlier decades. This is mainly because the number of towns in the State has increased from 31 in 1991 to 44 in 2001. In fact, in the total increase of 189,117 in urban population between 1991-2001, share of the population of newly created urban localities or towns after the 1991 Census works out to 129,132 or 68.28 per cent.

12 So far as annual exponential growth rate is concerned, it may be noticed that the annual growth rate during 1960-71 was more than four times than that observed during the preceding decade. The decades 1971-81 and 1981-91 registered more or less half of the growth rate recorded during 1960-71. The annual exponential growth rate for the decade 1991-2001 works out to 3.32 per cent which is lower by 0.64 percentage point than the preceding decade.

Trend of urbanization in the districts

Statement given below helps to examine the trend of urbanization in the districts of Goa.

Statement - 4

Trend of urbanization in the districts of Goa 1950-2001. r-~-Name Of I Census I Total I Urban-T Urban Population Decadal I the District year.. po. pulation Population 1as pe rcentage to growth of I total population urban population L______----+---~~ ____ _+~------~-----. ._-_- I 1 I 2 I 3 4 5 6 14.77 -- 17.57 25.74 - Goa 22.11 64.88 North ~- r [i1=1iH~~l--~~1j!~L-~~- ---__ 27.49 54.14 , I 1991 664804 r 225,604.1- __ _ 33.94 44.46 I 50.81 ~o:r-.__757~407~~)jO ,233 44.92-_--_._-- -- ~-I---- I I 062T-~--~ 10.19-· -- uth Goa ~ 19_50 216,574 22 1960 240,330 -:25 879 1 ----10: 7i-----f---~-1 DO~ 336,808 101 1971 -- -,921 3QiB 29385_ 1981 439,728 166 ,615 37.89 63.47 ------~.- ~------~\----~------1991 504,989 254 148 50.33 52.54 , ;;~;.-t--- --~-. -~-~-- 2001 586,591 328~ __ =--56~02 29.31

Out of the two districts, it is observed that, the pace of urbanization is much faster in South Goa District where the percentage of urban dwellers has gone up from 10.19 per cent in 1950 to 56.02 per cent in 2001. Whereas, in North Goa District, it has increased from 14.77 per cent in 1950 to 44.92 per cent in 2001. It may be noted that two of the three major Urban Agglomeration towns i.e. Margao Urban Agglomeration and Mormugao Urban Agglomeration are located in South Goa District. Population of these two Urban Agglomerations (i.e. 199,081) accounts for 29.76 per cent of the total urban population (i.e. 668,869) of the State in 2001. So far as growth of urban population is concerned, South Goa District has recorded a very high growth of 293.85 per cent during the decade 1960-71 as against 64.88 per cent recorded by North Goa District. Even during the next two decades i.e. 1971-81 and 1981-91, the decadal growth rate of urban population

13 was higher in South Goa District as compared to North Goa District. This trend has reversed in the decade 1991-2001 when the decadal growth rate of urban population was higher in North Goa District being 50.81 per cent as against 29.31 per cent in South Goa District.

Analysis of urban population by talukas of the State will provide us an opportunity to identify the talukas which are highly urbanized. The following statement shows the percentage of urban population in the talukas of Goa.

Statement-5

Percentage of urban population in the talukas, 2001.

State/District! Total Urban Urban Population as Taluka Population Population percentage to total population 1 2 3 4 GOA 1,343,998 668,869 49.77 NORTH GOA 757,407 340,233 44.92 Pernem 71,986 9,605 13.34 Bardez 227,010 132,771 58.49 Tiswadi 159,409 104,326 65.45 Bicholim 90,766 37,144 40.92 Satari 58,606 7,913 13.50 Ponda 149,630 48,474 ----32.40 . SOUTH Goa 586,591 328,636 56.02 ! I Mormugao 144,836 120,294 83.06 ! Salcete 259,787 151,570 58.34 Quepem 73,926 33,882 45.83 Sanguem 64,130 10,990 17.14 Canacona 43,912 11,900 27.10

It is evident from the figures presented in the above statement that Mormugao of South Goa District is the highly urbanized taluka in the State. A little over 83 per cent of the taluka total population is living in urban areas. It may be noted that Mormugao Port, a fertilizer factory and many ship-building units as well as small scale industries are located in this taluka. Tiswadi in North Goa occupies the second place with 65.45 per cent of its population living in urban areas. More than 58 per cent of population of Bardez (North Goa District) and Salcete (South Goa District) talukas is living in urban areas. of North Goa District is the least urbanized as only 13.34 per cent of Its population is living in urban areas. It is preceded by Satari (13.50 per cent) of the same district and Sanguem (17.14 per cent) in South Goa District.

14 Statutory and Non-Statutory Towns

For the Census of India 2001, in all 44 towns have been included in the urban frame of the State of Goa. Of these 44 towns, 14 are Statutory ""Fawns under the civic status of Municipal Council and the remaining 30 are Non-statutory or Census Towns under the administrative control of respective Village Panchayats in the State. The following statement shows the number of towns in 1991 and 2001 Censuses in the State.

Statement-6

Number of towns in Goa, 1991 and 2001.

Number of towns in Increase/decrease in the I State I District I number of towns I Taluka 1991 2001 between 1991-2001. 1 2 3 4 GOA 31 44 13 NORTH GOA 18 27 9 Pernem 1 2 1 ~___j Bardez 7 11 4 I Tiswadi 6 5 (-) 1 Bicholim 2 4 2 Satari 1 1 - ~ Ponda 1 4 3 SOUTH GOA 13 17 4 Mormugao 3 3 - Salcete 6 9 3 Quepem 2 2 - Sanguem 1 2 1 Canacona 1 1 -

At the 1991 Census there were 31 towns in Goa. Their number went up to 44 at the 2001 Census. Thus, there was a net increase of 13 towns between the period 1991-2001. Number of towns increased in the North Goa District is more being 9 as compared to 4 in the District of South Goa.

Among the talukas the increase in the number of towns is the highest in Bardez (4), followed by Ponda (3) both of the North Goa District and Salcete (3) of South Goa District. While the number of towns have remained the same in 1991 and 2001 in the talukas of Satari of North Goa District and Mormugao, Quepem and Canacona all of South Goa District, Tiswadi in North Goa District has lost one town in 2001 Census.

15 Distrjbution of urban population by size class of Towns ,

The urban population of Goa is spread over in 3 Urban Agglomerations and 35 Towns. The variation in population size of the Towns and Urban Agglomerations is very great. It is noticed from Table - 6 given in the report, that the population size varies between 4,320 in Parcem Town and 104,689 in Mormugao U.A. (i.e. including Chicalim Town a constituent unit of Mormugao Urban Agglomeration). The population of Mormugao Town (i.e. 97,085) alone constitutes 14.15 per cent of the total urban population of Goa and the population of Mormugao U.A. area is 15.65 per cent of the total urban population of Goa.

In the Census of India, traditionally the Towns are classified into six population size class as under:-

Class I 100,000 and above Class II 50,000 to 99,999 Class III 20,000 to 49,999 Class IV 10,000 to 19,999 Class V 5,000 to 9,999 Class VI Below 5,000

Of the 44 Towns of Goa 9 are components of 3 Urban Agglomerations. The following statement gives the distribution of 35 Towns and 3 Urban Agglomerations by population and other related particulars.

Statement-7

Distribution of Towns/Urban Agglomerations and of urban population by size class of Towns in 2001.

No.of Proportion of Total i Population of Size Class Towns Towns IU.As Population Proportionthe total hr1erag~;population I IU.As. to the total population to of a Town! no. of Towns the total urban U.A.

(------_._-- IU.As population ~ ______~

- 1 2 3 4 5 6 I 1 2.63 104,689 15.65 104,689 II 2 5.26 193,307 28.90 96,654 III 2 5.26 61,520 _- 9.20 30.7m IV 15 39.48 197,682 29.55 13,179 I I V 15 39.48 97,660 _----- 14.60 6,511 I VI 3 7.89 14,01T 4 67 I All 21:1=1 . °1 ~sses I 38 100.00 668,869 100.00_ 17,602

16 It may be mentioned that there was not a single town or Urban Agglomeration having population 100,000 and above in Goa till 1991 Census. It is for the first time in 2001 Census that Mormugao Urban Agglomeration with population 104,689 has been classified as Class I town and thereby has achieved the status of first city in the State. Population of Mormugao Urban Agglomeration constitutes 15.65 per cent of the total urban population of the State. The largest number of towns Le. 15 each belong to Class IV and V i.e. having a population between 5,000 and 19,999.

There are 2 Class II towns, incidentally both are Urban Agglomerations. Panaji U.A with population 98,915 is on the top followed by Margao U.A. with population 94,392.

In Category III also there are 2 towns. However, there is a wide gap between the population of Mapusa (40,122) and the another town i.e. Curchorem­ Cacora (21,398) of this class.

The Class IV Category has 15 towns. Penha - de - Franca (15,375) and other 4 towns are having more than 15,000 inhabitants in each. The population ranges between 12,000 and 15,000 in 4 towns and between 10,000 and 12,000 in 6 towns. Towns of Sancoale, Curti, Bandora, Sanquelim, and Socorro (Serula) have acquired the urban status for the first time in 2001 Census.

Among the 15 Class V towns, (8698) is the most populous and it is closely followed by Candolim (8599) and Sao Jose de Areal (8532). There are five towns having population between 6,000 and 8,000 and 7 towns having population between 5,000 and 6,000. Of the 15 towns in this size class, 7 viz. Sao Jose de Areal, Aldana, Saligao, Colvale, Queula, Goa Velha and Carapur have acquired the urban status for the first time in 2001 Census.

All the 3 towns in the size class VI Category are new towns of 2001 Census. Of these, Varca is the most populous (4859) and it is closely followed by Sanvordem (4832). The population of Parcem town of this class is 4320, the least populated town of the State.

Statement also reveals that the total population of 15 towns (197,682) of size class IV accounts for 29.55 per cent of the total urban population of the State. It is followed by the population of 2 U.As (193,307) of size class II with 28.90 pel cent. The lone U.A. i.e. Mormugao U.A. of Class I accounts for 15.65 per cent of the total urban population of the State. Thus, the towns/U.As of size classes I, II and IV accounts for as much as 74.10 per cent of the total urban population of the State. The towns in the size class III, V and VI accounts for only 25.90 per cent of the total urban population of the State.

Rural Population

According to the Provisional Population Totals of 1,027,015,247 for the country as a whole 741,660,293 persons were enumerated in rural areas in 2001 Census. In terms of percentage a little over 72 per cent were rural dwellers. The corresponding proportion a decade ago i.e. at the 1991 Census was 74 per cent.

17 Thus, there is a decrease of 2 percentage points in the country's rural population between the period 1991-2001. The following statement shows the progress in rural population of our country since 1901.

Statement-8

Progress in rural population, India, 1901-2001.

Rural Population Decadal Census Rural Total Population as percentage to growth of rural Year Population total population population 1 2 3 4 .5 1901 238,396,327 212,541,360 89.15 -- 1911 252,093,390 226,144,959 89.71 6.40 1921 251,321,213 223,229,914 88.82 (-)1;29 1931 278,977,238 245,514,699 88.01 9.98 1941 318,660,580 274,498,389 86.14 11.81 - 1951 361,088,090 298,644,381 82.71 8.80 1961 439,234,271 360,297,668 82.03 20.64 1971 548,159,652 439,045,675 80.09 21.86 1981 683,329,097 523,866,550 77.66 19.32 1991 846,302,688 628,691,676 74.29 20.01 2001 1,027,015,247 741,660,293 72.22 17.97

Source: Table No. 57 of State Profile 1991 - India

It is evident from the figures presented in the above statement that more than 80 per cent of the total population of our country was residing in rural areas till 1971 Census. It was the highest being almost 90 per cent (exactly 89.71 per cent) in 1911. Thereafter, it steadily dedi ned from census to census and stood at 72.22 per cent in 2001 Census. The statement also reveals that, the country has witnessed a considerable variation in the decadal growth of its rural population before independence period. However, in the first decade after independence i.e. 1951-61 the country has witnessed a considerably high growth rate of 20.64 per cent as compared to 8.80 per cent in the earlier decade of 1941-51. The country's rural growth rate was the highest during the decade 1961-71 being 21.86 per cent. It has than slightly decreased to 19.32 per cent in the decade 1971-81 and than increased to 20.01 per cent during the decade 1981-91. The decadal growth of rural population recorded in the last decade i.e. 1991-2001 is the lowest being 17.97 per cent in the censuses of post independence era of our country.

There are 19 States and one in which the percentage of rural population is higher than the country's average of 72.22 per cent. It is also noticed that there are 8 States in India in with more than 80 per cent of their respective population is still living in rural areas. They are Himachal Pradesh (90.21 per cent), Bihar (89.53 per cent), Sikkim (88.90 per cent), Assam (87.28 per cent), Orissa (85.03 per cent), Tripura (82.98 per cent), Nagaland (82.26 per cent) and Meghalaya (80.37 per cent).

18 In our State, of the total population 1,343,998 in 2001 Census, 675,129 or 50.23 per cent persons were residing in 347 inhabited villages. This percentage as compared to country's average of 72.22 per cent, is very low. Statement given below shows the progress of rural population in Goa State. As mentioned earlier, the distribution of rural-urban population is not available for the censuses prior to 1950 and hence, the data presented in the Statement below shows the progress in rural population for the Census year 1950 and onwards.

Statement-9

Progress in Rural Population Goa, 1950-2001.

I Census Total Rural Rural Population Decadal growth Year Population Population as percentage to of Rural total population Population 1 2 3 4 5 1950 547,448 476,517 87.04 -- 1960 589,997 502,668 85.20 5.49 1971 795,120 591,877 74.44 17.75 1981 1,007,749 684,964 67.97 15.73

1991 1,169,793 -_ .. 690,041 58.99 0.74 2001 1,343,998 675,129 50.23 (-)2.16 ~-

It is seen that more than 85 per cent of the total population in 1950 and 1960 were residing in rural areas of the State. However, a steep decrease in the percentage of rural dwellers could be seen in the successive censuses. It has come down 50.23 per cent in the Census of 2001.

If we consider the growth of the rural population during the period 1950- 2001, the rural growth rate tor the State works out to 41.68 per cent as against 145.50 per cent observed in the total population of the State during the same period. Interestingly, the growth of urban population during the period 1950-2001 works out to as high as 843 per cent (exactly 842.99 per cent). This explains the reason for the low growth rate in rural population during the decades after 1950- 60. The rural growth rate was less than a per cent (exactly 0.74 per cent) during the decade 1981-91 and it was (-) 2.16 per cent for the decade 1991-2001. There was decrease of 14,912 persons in the State rural population between the period 1991 and 2001.

The progress in rural population in the Districts of North Goa and South Goa can be examined from the figures presented in the below given statement.

19 Statement-10

Progress in rural population in the districts of Goa, 1950-2001.

I Name of Census Total Rural I Rural De the District Year Population Population Population as gro \ percentage to r , I total population pop 2 3 4 5 .=t==. - - --- Goa 1950 330,874 282,005 85.23 ~Nort~- . I 1960 349,667 288,217 82.43 ----+--I .. 1971 458,312 356,993 77.89 i --1------.------+--.------1981 568,021 411,851 FI·--~--- 1991 664,804 439,200 ~~~~~------}---- ~- 2001 757,407 417,174 55.08 -f rSouth Goa 1950 216,574 194,51?_ 89.81---'- f------~- - ! 1960 240,330 214,451 89.23 -r 1971 336,808 1981 439,728 1991 504,989 /--. m'mJ -ii~I .. T_ .. i 2001 586,591

Of the State's total rural population of 675,129 in 2001 Census North Goa District has accounted for 417,174 while South Goa District has recorded 257,955 persons. The proportions of both these districts are 61.79 per cent and 38.21 per cent respectively. It is seen from the figures presented in the statement the percentage of the total population living in rural areas is considerably higher in the District of North Goa being 55.08 per cent as compared to 43.98 per cent recorded in South Goa District in the 2001 Census. This is true even in the censuses of 1971, 1981 and 1991. It is also seen that the proportion of rural . population in South Goa District has decreased at a much faster rate in the censuses after 1960, as compared to North Goa District.

If we consider the growth of the rural population during the period 1950- 2001, the rural growth rate for North Goa District works out to 47.93 per cent while it is 32.62 per cent in respect of South Goa District. The corresponding rural growth rate for the State as a whole stands at 41.68 per cent. Although, the District of South Goa has recorded relatively lower growth rate, the growth rate for the State and for the District North Goa are fairly good for the period 1950-2001. Whereas, the decade 1991-2001 has recorded a negative growth rate for the State as a wpole being (-) 2.16 per cent and for the North Goa District being (-) 5.02 per cent. The South Goa District has however recorded a positive growth rate of 2.84 per cent in 1991-2001, after recording a negative growth rate of (-) 8.15 per cent in the earlier decade of 1981-91. Declassification of two 1991 Census Towns viz. Cortalim and Raia of this district as villages in 2001 Census has certainly helped to a great extent in the improvement of its rural growth rate for the decade 1991-2001.

20 SEX RATIO

Indian Census has the tradition of bringing out disaggregated information by sex on various aspect of population. The first and foremost is the simple count of males and females. Changes in sex composition largely reflects the underlying socio-economic and cultural patterns of a society in different ways. The sex ratio which is defined as the number of females per 1000 males in the population, is an important social indicator to measure the extent of prevailing equity between males and females in a society at a given point of time. The sex composition of the population is generally affected by the differentials in sex ratio at birth, sex selective migration and differentials in mortality among males and females.

Sex ratio, in our country had always been unfavourable to women. Statement given below presents the trend in sex ratio in India since 1901.

Statement-11

Sex ratio, India: 1901-2001

Census Year Sex ratio ~ >-- (Females per 1000 Males) i 1901 972 !.------1:-::9-:-1-:-1------+-----.-----=9_:__6=4------, f------+------~------i

! 1921 955' ~ --~ I 1931 950 __J i- lEl T ~:~--- _:_ ~ r------i-ii-,-i,------4 rr; _~-~~=J ~======~-====~2_0_0_1-_=__=_-_-_=__=___=__ ___L______93~_~____ ._~ ____ J

* Provisional.

According to the Census of India 2001, the sex ratio stands at 933 for the country as a whole. A gain of 6 points in the sex ratio of 2001 over the 1991 Census sex ratio of 927, is a welcome improvement. The figures presented in the statement reveal that sex ratio at the beginning of the twentieth century was 972 and thereafter showed continuous decline until 1941. In 1951 there was a marginal increase of one point, but thereafter it again dropped for two consecutive decades to reach 930 in 1971 to 934 in 1981. However, the 1991 Census recorded the lowest sex ratio of 927 since 1901.

The trend. in sex ratio in respect of Goa State is quite different than in our country. Right from 1900 until 1960 the State had witnessed a female favouring sex ratio. But, thereafter the sex ratio has swung in favour of males in the subsequent censuses till 2001. The following statement shows the trend in sex ratio in the population of Goa since 1900.

21 Statement-12

Sex ratio, Goa: 1900-2001.

Census Year I -----1~96o------~--r-- i 1910 1108 -----~_____i ~ ______1~9~2~1 __~ i ___~1120 J -r---~- ~ 1931 i 1088 I i 1084 1940 -----'- - I l L 1950 __1128 ____--j I 1960 1066 ~ i 1971 981 ~~ I 1981 975 1991 967 2001 960* ____1

Provisional.

While the period prior to liberation i.e. Prior to 1960, witnessed heavy exodus of local male population to neighbouring states and foreign countries for employment, higher education etc., the post liberation period witnessed in­ migration of labours from the neighbouring states and other parts of the country, which were predominantly males, apart from arresting the out-migration of the local male population. It is also interesting to note that though the sex ratio for Goa has steadily declined over the decades from 981 in 1971 to 960 in 2001, it has been significantly above the country's sex ratio which is 933 in 2001. Among the States and Union Territories only Kerala and the U.T. of Pondicherry had a female favouring sex ratio of 1058 and 1001 respectively in 2001.

Rural-Urban sex ratio:

Statement presented below shows the district and taluka-wise sex ratio separately for rural and urban areas for the Census years 1991 and 2001.

Statement-13

Sex ratio by residence, 1991-2001 iStateiD,strictrfill~-~-~------Census Year -~----l I uka J______~_~ I --; ------~- 1991 , 2001 i F---~----_I_Iot~=-1=RLI@cr=Urban I Total I Rural \ Urban-l iGOA 1 ~:_ =9671 39931 ~9301 59601 6988+-_7933i l~~~;~GO==t~= ~~:~r .:~t_:--}~!l-~~~··-~T~E

" , ~ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 l Bardez 994 1,030 951 955 996 927 I Tiswadi 941 995 913 968 1,012 945 I Bicholim 946 955 918 943 947 936 I Satari 977 980 958 962 962 961 799 ' 937 958 893 I Ponda -- 936 955 I SOUTH GOA 971 1,008 936 I 972-f----- 1,018 937 r I Mormugao 878 970 85 93 1,025 I 868 I Salcete 1,031 1,063 1,00~-t-=J , 19 1,067 986 I Quepem I 967 966 968 973 974 971 1 Sanguem 958 960 948 967 964 978 974-! 986 ' I Canacona I ------'-_ _j__ 941 976 997 921

It is noticed that as in the State the sex ratio in North Goa District has declined in 2001 but, in respect of South Goa District it has marginally improved in 2001.

Among the talukas, Salcete in South Goa District has the female favouring sex ratio being 1019 in 2001. It was 1031 a decade ago. The lowest sex ratio of 893 is recorded in Mormugao taluka of South Goa District. It is important to note that there is a significant improvement in the sex ratio of this taluka from 878 in 1991 to 893 in 2001. The low sex ratio in Mormugao taluka is mainly due to the in-migrant labour employed at Mormugao Port and other major industrial units such as Goa Shipyard, Zuari Alndustries, Defence Institutions etc. Besides Mormugao, other talukas which have improved their sex ratio in 2001 are Tiswadi and Ponda in North Goa and Quepem, Sanguem and Canacona in South Goa District.

Rural-Urban sex ratio indicates that, urban sex ratio is more adverse to females as compared to rural sex ratio. According to the 2001 Census, urban sex ratio of the State is 933 as against rural sex ratio of 988. A marginal improvement of 3 points in urban sex ratio is quite encouraging but fall of 5 points in rural sex ratio during the decade 1991-2001 is disappointing. Among the districts there are 1018 females per 1000 males in rural areas of the South Goa District as against 970 females per 1000 males in rural population of North Goa District. Urban sex ratio is quite low as compared to rural sex rabo in both the districts in 2001. Further, while there is a decline in rural sex ratio in the population of the State as well as North Goa District there is an improvement in rural sex ratio in South Goa District during the decade 1991-2001. Improvement in urban sex ratio in the State as well as in both the districts is an encouraging trend.

Sex ratio is an indication of the employment situation in any particular area as, axiomatically, there is ceteris paribus a migration of labour force from the low employment belt to the high employment belt. Thus, an area having a sex ratio favouring males is supposed to have better employment market than an area having a sex ratio favouring females. The urban sex ratios authenticate well the statement made above. Town-wise sex ratio:

There are 44 towns in the State at the 2001 Census. Of these 14 are Municipal towns and the remaining 30 are Census Towns. It may be quite interesting to study the sex ratio in the towns of Goa. The following statement presents the sex ratio in the towns. The towns are arranged in alphabetical order.

Statement-14

Town-wise sex ratio, Goa, 2001.

Name of the Town Sex ratio 1 i_I______(Females per thousand Males) __ ~_~ ! 1 2 __ ~ __~ I 1. Aldona CT 1,155 ---~ ~~~eb~I~~-=-=--~-__j! .____ 91~ __J 11: 558 -~~-J ndora CT ----t------846 __ ~ ___ ~ __ ~ naulim CT 1,054 __-I r 6. Bicholim MCI i 935 LL_Calangute CT t 864 i 8. Calapor-----. CT 989 I 9. Canacona MCI 921 I 10. Candolim-:-C_T_~ ______~----1 ______9cc-1.:--:9,---- ___ ~Carapur CT 993 r-11-2-. Chicalim-C-T-- 730 ---- r 13. Chimbel CT 976 I 14. Chinchinim CT 1,149 I 15. Colvale CT 821 I 16. Cuncolim MCI 1,049 1 17. Curchorem-Cacora MCI t 952 i 18. Curti CT_____ r= 874 i 19. Davorlim CT I 922

II 20. Goa Velha CT i------883 21. Guirim CT I ---~-9-:--4-7- 2-2-M-apusa MCI I ------:-925 23. Margao MCI 968 f-- I I 24. Mormugao MCI 884 I - I 25. Navelim CT 918 ~_paleCT I 887 I Panaji MCI* I 975 I 28. Penha-de-Franca CT 875 I 29. Parcem CT 963 130. Pernem MCI I 925 ~Ponda MCI______I 930 I 32. Queula CT 933 ------r._+------I 1_33_._Q_u~p_e_f!l_M_CL ___ ---_____j___---- 1,005

.. 24 ~ 1 2 ~Reis¥~_~-g-o-s-~~J=_-_-~------~ 803 _____ ---r_j f--:135.S~S_=_alig-ao CT ___ ~ ____ ~__j--- __9_7_2 ______I 36. sancc:>_~I_e_C_T__~. ______~~~------~-;-~------1 r~~: ~:~~~~m~&------t- ____ 936 13~ SallVordem CT------~-I - 988 c. __~ ___ ----~-----. +------~------___1 i 40. SaQ __jos~_de Areal CT ___+ 950 i 41. Siolim CT 1,096 L~?_:_§~~Qjrol§-e-ru-la-) CI______~ 971 i 43. ~§llpqL_MCI__ -_ ___L 961 i 44_,_y~_rc~g_T L_~__ __1 ,114

* Includes outgrowths.

It may be seen that 7 out of 44 (or about 16 per cent) Towns in the State are having female favouring sex ratio. highest being 1155 in Aldona Census Towr.. Of these 7 Towns 2 are Municipal Towns and 5 are Census Towns. Bambolim (CT) has recorded the lowest sex ratio of 558 preceded by Chicalim CT (730), Reis Magos CT (803), Colvale CT (821) and Bandora CT (846)_

It is important to note that of 7 Towns having female favouring sex ratio, as many as 5 are located in South Goa District and only 2 are in North Goa District. In fact the South Goa District has recorded a better sex ratio (972) as compared to 951 in North Goa District.

Sex ratio among the population of 0-6 years:

It will be quite interesting to examine the sex ratio among the population of 0-6 years in the State. The statement given below presents the data upto the taluka level.

Statement-15

Sex ratio of child population in the age group 0-6 years - 1991 and 2001

I St~~e/DistriCti ~===-=--- T§~I9J_n t~rouPO:6Ye~;n---~-----i i_ _'-:,_~as I-T~~ 1 ~jal IlJr~an l __ T~al T ~aT+ ur~an J

:J~~~~i --_ ___ J~r-____1~~tF-~~ I ~:~ - ~;-r-- ~~~ I~~t~iim --=-1 . - ~~~ t- ~~~ -- ~;; --~~+ -_~;~ I ~ ~;~_ ~£,_(~md_~ _ -- ~57 ____ 965 __ 903 i______giiL~ ___ ~§5_L ____ 903__

25 I 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 SOUTH GOA 961 975 947 934 964 912 Mormugao 954 974 949 902 920 899 Salcete 955 962 948 950 992 922 Quepem 977 992 941 917 932 899 Sanguem 989 1001 866 970 982 914 Canacona 946 951 932 937 922 982

According to the Census of India 2001 the child population in the age­ group 0-6 stood at 1,42,152 in the State. Of these, 68,605 were female children. The sex ratio among children age - group which works out to 933 is considerably low when compared with 960 in the total population of the State. Rural and Urban sex ratio in child population works out to 948 and 919 respectively as against 988 and 933 in the total rural and urban population of the State. Thus, it can be seen that rural sex ratio of child population is much adverse to females than it is in the rural population of the State.

The sex ratio of child population has come down from 964 in 1991 to 933 in 2001 registering a decrease of 31 points. Figures presented in Statement above further reveals that the decrease in urban sex ratio is very sharp being 34 points as compared to 24 points in rural sex ratio.

Decreasing trend in the sex ratio of child population is very much evident in . the total as well as rural and urban population of the district and taluka population of the State. However, some improvement in child sex ratio can be noticed in Salcete rural (from 962 in 1991 to 992 in 2001) and in urban areas of Tiswadi (from 944 to 959), Satari (from 937 to 976), Sanguem (from 866 to 914) and Canacona (from 932 to 982) during the decade 1991 - 2001.

26 LITERACY

Literacy is one ot the important social characteristics on which information is obtained ot every individual in the census. For the purpose of census a person aged seven years and above, who can both read and write with understanding in any language is treated as literate. A person who can only read but cannot write is not literate. In the censuses prior to 1991, children below five years of age were necessarily treated as illiterate.

The ability to read and write with understanding is not ordinarily achieved until one had some SChooling or at least some time to develop these skills. It was decided therefore, at the 1991 census that all children in the age-group 0-6, will be treated as illiterate by detlnition and the population aged seven years and above only is to be classified as literate or illiterate. The same criterion has been retained at the Census of India, 2001, also. It is not mandatory that to be treated as literate, a person should have received any formal education or acquired any minimum educational standard. Literacy status can be acquired through adult literacy classes or by attending any non-formal educational system. Persons who are unfortunately blind and read in Braille are also treated as literates.

In censuses up to 1981, it was customary to work out the literacy rate taking into account the total population. Since literacy rate is more meaningful if the sub-population in age-group 0-6 is excluded from the total population, it was decided in 1991 to use the term literacy rate for the population relating to seven years and above. The same concept has been continued in the present census also.

Statement below shows the number of literates and illiterates in the population of the country aged 7 years and above for the 199~ and 2001 censuses. Statement-16

Number of literates and illiterates among population aged 7 years and above and their Change - India: 1991 and 2001.

1--,_Li_te_r_a_te_s_~_"_lit_e_ra_t_e_s-t- __-p_e_-r_~=-o_n~s-==-t M~-e-s ------i----Fe-~al~_s_---~-_-_.-.. ~

I Lite.rates ! ---=--;~~_-~ -----+--;-~--~~:~-~~:~~=~~~:!~!~~~F· -I*-~f.~f~ I Increase in 2001 203,608,117 107,986,561 I 95,621,556 1 lover 1991 ! Illiterates I 199-1------,------::-3-28,167,28-8 I t---- L_____ 2_00_1____ 296,208,95~ -(~!n~i I ... (~~~:m:m. I Increase in 2001 (-)31,958, 336 1

!over1991_____~ ______L__ I I ______J

Note: Source - Provisional Population Totals India (Statement 25), Pg 106 ..

..,~ _I It is important to note that the total number of illiterates has come down from 328,167,288 in 1991 to 296,208,952 in 2001. Thus, for the first time since independence, there is decline in the absolute number of illiterates during a decade. This is a major shift in improving the literacy status in India. Out of the 203,608,117 added to the literate population during 1991-2001, 107,986,561 were males and 95,621,556 were females. On the other hand during this period the contribution to the total decrease of 31,958,336 among illiterates, is dominated by males (21,445,145) as compared to the females (10,513,191).

Statement below shows the number of literates and illiterates in the population of the State and districts aged 7 years and above for the 1991 and 2001.

Statement-17

Number of literates and illiterates in the population aged 7 years and above in the State and Districts of Goa, 1991 and 2001. f Literateslllliterates Persons Males Females 1 2 3 4 Goa Literates I 1991 779,596 439,034 340.5 62 989,362 544,006 445,3 56 r~~ase 2001 in 2001 209,766 104,972 104,7 94 over 1991 , --+ Illiterates I I~------~------~--~.------~~~.------1991 252,881 1 85,8461 16703sJ'-~ 2001 84 064 .144,~ 212.4 1 68, 1 397 (-)17,782 (-)22,6 Increase in 20011 (-)40, 1 over 1991 _ i -- NORTH Goa Literates ----ilI 1991 457,5541 258,567 1 198,987, 2001 571,861 I 315,344 ! 256,5 ----~---- Increase in 2001 114,307 56,777 57,5 1tl ~~91 _____L.___ ~ ___. ___ ~ I~rn~s i I 1991 I __1 __ 31--'-,5_7_1--+-- ______4_1--"..,_5 7_4-+-1 _____-- __-8-9-, 9-9-7J

2001 I. 107,973 32,610 75,363 Increase in 2001 (-) 23.5981 (-)8,964 (-)14,634 over 1991 I ---- ..L-__ SOUTH GOA _____ .. l 1 Literates I I 1991 322,042 180 ,467 ;.-----141]751 --- ~-- [ -2001 417,501 228 ,662 188,839 I Increase in 2001 95,459 48 ,195 47,264

over 1991 _ _...L_I ______------' ! 1 2 3 4 Illiterates 1991 121,310 44,272 77,038 2001 104,511 35,454 69,057 Increase in 2001 (-)16,799 (-)8,818 (-)7,981 over 1991

It is noticed that out of the 209,766 added to the literate population during 1991-2001 in the State the share of males and females is almost equal being 104,972 (50.04 per cent) and 104,794 (49.96 per cent) respectively. It is quite encouraging to note that females are not behind in the field of literacy in the State. It clearly indicates the high standard of females in the socia-cultural field of the Goan Society. Domination of the females i.e. 22,615 in the total decrease of the number of illiterates i.e. 40,397 indicates the spread of female literacy in the State. Almost identical trend can be noticed in the district population also.

Literacy rate

The rate of literacy in the population aged 7 years and above as revealed by the Census of India 2001 for the State is presented in the Statement given below:- Statement-18

Literacy rate by residence for tRe State and Districts, 2001.

Total Literacy Rate Statel Rural District Persons Males Females Urban 1 2 3 4 5 Total 82.32 88.88 75.51 GOA Rural 79.65 87.69 71.55 Urban 85.03 90.06 79.65 Total 84.12 90.63 77.29 NORTH GOA Rural 82.43 90.31 74.33 Urban 86.20 91.01 81.02 Total 79.98 86.58 73.22 SOUTH GOA Rural 75.12 83.30 67.14 Urban 83.81 89.05 78.23

According to the provisional population of the Census of India 2001, literacy rate among the population 7 years and above worked out to 82.32 per cent. The corresponding rates for the males and females worked out to 88.88 per cent and 75.51 per cent respectively. The State literacy rate at the 1991 Census was 75.51 per cent and among the males and females it was 83.64 per cent and 67.09 per cent respectively. Thus, it may be seen that the State has improved its literacy rate by 6.81 percentage points in 2001 over 1991. The improvement in female literacy rate is little higher being 8.42 percentage points as compared to male literacy rate which is 5.24 percentage points.

29 Among the districts of the State the literacy rate in the North Goa District is higher being 84.12 per cent as compared to 79.98 per cent recorded in South Goa District. Infact, the male and female literacy rates are also higher in North Goa as compared to South Goa.

Rural-urban literacy rate

Almost 80 per cent (to be exact 79.65 per cent) of the total rural population of 7 years and above in the State was recorded literates at the 2001 Census. Rural literacy rate for males and females worked out to 87.69 per cent and 71.55 per cent respectively. Thus, there is a gap of 16.14 percentage points between the male and female literacy rate in rural Goa. Literacy rate among the urban population is obviously higher being 85.03 per cent as compared to rural literacy rate of 79.65 per cent. Literacy rate among the urban males is as high as 90.06 per cent. The corresponding rate for urban females worked out to 79.65 per cent. In other words it can be said that in urban areas of the State 9 out of every 10 males and almost 8 out of every 10 females are literates.

Among the two Districts of the State, North Goa has better literacy rate as compared to South Goa. This is true in respect of rural and urban areas as well as among males and females also. Male literacy rate in total including rural and urban in North Goa which is more than 90 per cent is quite significant.

The gap between the male and female literacy rate in North Goa and South Goa is almost identical being 13.34 and 13.36 percentage points respectively. The corresponding figures in rural areas are also comparable being 15.98 percentage points in North Goa as against 16.16 percentage points in South Goa. The gap between male and female literacy rates in urban areas of North Goa worked out to 9.99 percentage points as against 10.82 percentage points in South Goa District.

Literacy rate in the Towns

It will be quite interesting to examine the literacy of the towns of the State as revealed by the 2001 Census. Statement below presents the literacy rate of each town of Goa. The towns are presented in alphabetical order.

Statement-19

Literacy rates in the towns of the State, 2001. i Litercl-CY rate Name of the Town -- Persons -----,-Males Females 1 2 3 4 ~~- Aldona CT 87.31 93.71 81.87 Aquem CT 80.33" 87.66 72.84 Bambolim CT 90.62 95.03 81.99 ~--'- -~~------

30 - 1 2 3 4 Bandora CT 79.01 85.56 71.15 Benaulim CT 81.88 86.25 77.81 Bicholim MCI 88.80 93.54 83.73 Calangute CT 81.33 86.86 74.87 Calapor CT 89.02 94.18 83.81 Canacona MCI 80.52 86.42 74.06 Candolim CT 83.37 89.49 76.96 Carapur CT 86.34 94.54 78.14 Chicalim CT 90.70 95.00 84.74 Chimbel CT 70.86 78.40 63.18 Chinchinim CT 82.31 85.99 79.19 Colvale CT 79.64 82.01 76.71 Cuncolim Mel 86.46 92.46 80.81 Curchorem-Cacora MCI 83.49 89.62 77.09 Curti CT 81.70 86.28 76.45 Davorlim CT 83.39 88.55 77.76 Goa Velha CT 84.75 89.76 79.04 Guirim CT 79.63 85.33 73.63 Mapusa MCI 86.13 90.27 81.70 Margao MCI 85.41 89.27 81.45 Mormugao MCI 85.06 90.40 79.01 Navelim CT 84.70 89.16 79.82 Pale CT 83.77 91.54 74.95 Panaji Urban* 89.02 93.29 84.66 Panaji MCI 89.39 93.43 85.26 Penha-de-Franca CT 89.46 91.42 87.19 Parcem CT 81.87 90.97 72.57 Pernem MCI 82.29 86.84 77.35 Ponda MCI 91.88 94.69 88.89 Queula CT 87.56 93.04 81.66 Quepem MCI 79.84 86.27 73.55 Reis Magos CT 87.41 91.20 82.62 Saligao CT 89.11 95.10 82.98 Sancoale CT 76.12 84.20 66.33 Sanguem MCI 84.40 91.89 76.85 Sanquelim MCI 86.72 92.96 82.18 Sanvordem CT 81.68 87.81 75.44 Sao Jose de Areal CT 72.31 78.73 65.67 Siolim CT 90.13 96.23 84.60 Socorro (Serula) CT 87.01 90.99 82.93 Valpoi MCI 88.79 94.77 82.57 Varca CT 86.23 90.63 82.36

*Includes Panaji Mel and six outgrowths.

Among the towns Ponda MC; hr.ls recorded the highest literacy rate of 91.88 per cent followed by Chicalim (90.70 per cent), Bambolim (90.62 per cent)

31 and Siolim (90.13 per cent). The lowest literacy rate is recorded by Chimbel being 70.86 per cent, preceded by Sao Jose de Areal (72.31 per cent) and Sancoale (76.12 per cent). Among the Males highest literacy rate is recorded by Siolim being 96.23 per cent followed by Saligao (95.10 per cent), Bambolim (95.03 per cent) and Chicalim (95.00 per cent). In all there are 20 towns with male literacy rate above 90 per cent. The highest literacy rate among the females is recorded by Ponda MCI being 88.89 per cent followed by Penha de Franca (87.19 per cent), Panaji Mel (85.26 per cent), Siolim (84.60 percent) and Chicalim (84.74 per cent). In all there are 20 towns with female literacy above 80 per cent. The lowest female literacy rate is recorded by Chimbel being 63.18 per cent, preceded by Sao Jose de Areal (65.67 per cent) and Sancoale (66.33 per cent).

32 Cl-tARTS AND MAPS

15' GOA URBAN POPULATION - 2001

45' - 45'

30' 30

o Az

.' '.,.( 15' ARABIAN 15' SEA

SOU T H GOA (56.02) .h

PERCENTAGE OF URBAN POPULATION b TO TOTAL POPULATION J 45.01 AND ABOVE --State Average [JJJJJ (49.77) II .4

KILOMETRES 45 1 =-= 1. ,00 AND BELOW 5 0 5 10 15 IIIIII I' I I

BOUNDARIES: STATE DISTRICT SUB· DIVISIONAL ~. TALUKA

45' ANJADIP IIlLAND ~ • 14° (GOA). '"

73° 4S' EAST OF GREENWICH 15'

Based upon S~rvey of India map wl&tt the permission of the Surveyor Genera! of India. © Government of In

15' GOA TOWNS/URBAN AGGLOMERATIONS BY SIZE CLASS - 2001

45'

30 ' 30

..' .' . .. ~oooraA .;; ~ V6_ Sancoale \ Q I 0 Ponda : ••.: ..... ,. ,~ua ...... '1N, D I Az \ Ma.gaoU.A. D '_-',- -

Benaulim - » 15' -.0 A R A B I A N 0 ...._ .. IS' S E A Varca ~ \ Cuncolimo / ,/ s o u ~T H .G o A ",, ~ f, _oJ ..... ,,'

KILOMETRES CLASS III (20000 - 49 999) o 5 O. 5 10 15 I ! II ! I I I I () CLASS IV (10 000 -19 999)

BOUND.A.RIES : ~ CLASS V (5 000 - 9 999) STATE DISTRICT ______o CLASS VI (BELOW 5 000) " . SUB· DIVISIONAL ...... , .. . TALUKA

URBAN CENTRES WITH RED FIRM LINES ARE NEW TOWNS UA URBAN AGGLOMERATION

730 45' EAST OF GREENWICH 15'

Based UIlQn SUlVay of India map wnh the penni ••ion of the Surveyor General 01 Inelia. © Govemment of India copyrigtft, 2001. The territorial waters of India extend into the sea to a distance of t'Netve nautical mile$ mc,t2sured from the aj>p.oprjate base line.

IS' GOA A R A INTERCENSAL CHANGE IN URBAN POPULATION 1991 - 2001 40'

3~' 30

Az

15' A RA B I A N IS' ------'---+----- ._---_._---_._""'-, S E A .------~ ------1

- --_. s--o-~ T -H __~_ G-O-A ==i ~ ______(2931) __. ______. - ~ ~

PERCENTAGE GROWTH IN URBAN ------~--:-----? POPULATION 1991-2001

30.01 AND ABOVE - State Average (3942)

KilOMETRES 8 30.00 AND BELOW

c·

45' 14°

73° 45' EAST OF GREENWICH IS'

Based upon Survey of India map with the permiSSion of the Surveyor General of India © GO\lernmentofln$a~yrjght, 2001. The territorial waters of Jndla extend into tile sea to a distance of twelve nautical miles measured from the appropriate base line

15' GOA -l GROWTH OF UAICLASS I URBAN CENTRES 45' - 1991·2001 - 45'

Mapusa /~, , , I I j , G 0 A \ 30' 30

-',:> o \ I.. Sanguem f"'''''_')

15' Margao UA A R A B I A N ("._ 15' S E A \ " ...... , '-, \ /". "" '\._ .... _,,-) I " '" ../ . " S 0 U ~~lT H G o A '", ~ " _J'" ,,"' ...... \ \1 j \ _ ... -_ .... , I l.,____ " I ., < "l ' \'-" ( ...... ---_.... , ~ \. ... --~ ...... ""' .... ,~,. \) r- PERCENTAGE OF GROWTH OF V .... ,L_ ..... - ... r' POPULATION 1991·2001 1 0' 15° '\ \ .. ~.f mt±3 15.77 ~ Canacona ') rv' .f'4, 'I' l ) KILOMETRES ,.r.c...... ,'. 'v 5 0 10,15 fyoo:.~t ooot:INt~tl:t~t!slt::::=:±=.::jIt:.==. j! Figures in bracket indicates growth rate,

Figures on top of the Circle indicates actual population, DISTRICT ______SUB. DIVISIONAL ' ••. , •.••• , .• , ...• , .. TALUKA • ______

ANJADIP IS~ND~ 45' (GOA) ") 14° ~----~------______j______. ______~ __. __ J______~ 73° AS' EAST OF GREENWICH 74° 0' 15'

Based upon Survey of India map with the permission of the Surveyor General of India © Govemment of India copyright. 2001 The territorial waters of India extend into the sea to a distance of twelve nautical mikts measured from the appropriate base line.

IS' I I I GOA ... fI.. H A R 4 "'. .~ oS INTERCENS~L CHANGE IN RURAL r:4 .. ' POPULATION 1991 - 2001 4S'f- {:: :t._. h .r-" . . . . ,V'"':-. '1 - 45' I'~~/.·: .. ::: .. ::: ...... " ...... '" .. ~ . : : : : : : : : : : : : :,.. : ~.'~ :l!:' : :-':., .0 :::::~:'.:::::::~ "-. J:':t_£:.'=', .\•• "•••• ii i'~l~Ir~ErFJrJ·.· ;•.• \ 3~' f-- L#:~l -. ,,~,,: -....••..•...•••• if - 30 c-J : ...... , ...... ' . "'.' ...... '/"'.( 1\. ~~~; .. : : .. : : : : : : : : : : .' :,::': : -.: '. : : : : :/,{I I I I I ~ ,'" ...... '";""r - - '" 1 I I I I oj ...... , \.: I I I I ,( "'-- n../') .,. "" _...... , , . . . ./' I I I I I I I 'j ') II'--'~' L-;~~"'-C--'\ ...... , .I I 1 I , I 1 I . ( -'J I I I. I ,I 1'." ...•...'-:~I I I I I I I I:

Q -~ -I, /".1,,1, '1\, ••:,,: .' : : : : : : : :,: I ' I I I I I 1.1 I I I 1 1:'1'-' -= , '~II { 1 ' I I I ~ "\ N : : : : '.) \ P I I I ,I I 1 : I II 'I \ Az ,,1'1 I I I 1I 1\-:: :C': : (I I I, I I I I 'I I I I:' I I ' ( _I I I I \"':"""':-::'(r1l11Ijlll I 'II II,' I I 1 I 1 I "(' --. .',' 1 I I 1 .) I I I I I I I I I' I I\., .. )1 I I 'I I I I I I, ;-J.."'-. I I 1 1 \ I '\'..:.( I \ 1 \ 1 \ I \ ..1' 15'1-' A 'R A B I A N 1 \ 1 1 I 'I I I I I 1 I., I ~ I III\. I I I 1 I I 1 I ,I I I ; I I 1 I I I '1'-' SEA I I 1 1 1 I, r I 1.1 I'! I I I 1 I I '\ 1 1 , I 1 I j I 'I I I I:i I I 1 I 'I J ~ 1 ill ' 1 1'1 I I 1 i\ + I ,I 1 \ I \ "\ \' " \ ,\ I I 1/' I 1 I. ,r! ,I I, I I, I I , ~, 1,1. 1 I l I I ; I I I , 1 I.Y 1 1 ('

ANJADIP ISlJ\ND 45' ~. ~ -140 (GOA) ",' t 1 I I ______L- __-L ______J 73° 45' EAST OF GREENWICH IS'

Based upon Survey of India map with the permission of the Surv:yor General of India © Government of India copynght, 2001. The territorial waters of India extend Into the sea lo·a distance of twel .... e nautical miles measured from the appropriate base line.

DISTRIBUTION OF RURAL - URBAN POPULATION IN DISTRICTS 2001

~ Rura l 500,000 El Urban

400,000

U) ..c .::x:. CO _J 300,000 .c- c .0._. CO :::J 200,000 a. 0 0...

100,000

o North Goa South Goa

...

DISTRIBUTION OF RURAL - URBAN POPULATION 1950 TO 2001

iii Total 1400000 (/) o Rural ..c 1200000 ~ ~ Urban to _j 1000000 .~ c 800000 .0 600000 --C1l :::J 0.. 400000 o a.. 200000 o ·1·9.50 1960 1971 1981 1991 2001 Census Years

PERCENTAGE OECADAL GROWTH IN URBAN POPULATION 1950-2001

140

120

100 Q} Ol ...... co 80 c Q) (.) '- 60 (l) a.. 40

2Q ... 0 - a ~ ~ ~ ~ co t- oo m a m (J) 0 ..-m ..-m ..- ""I I J I ~ a 0 ..- ..- -or- LO ill t- Q) .- (J') 0) (j) '-{ g? m ...- ..- -or- T"" -or-

No. of Towns

~ ~ ,_\. ,_\. ,_\. ,_\. c_ . o ,_\. N W ~ ~ m ~ ro ID 0 ~ N W ~ ~ ,...tn ..,__ I

_, tr ,_, c: ~ ...... I"'+- ID ._ 0 _. U1 ,_, 0 < OJ- 0 < (J) ::s :5 tJ) ...,0 .-+ '1'l 0 0 -s::0"0 D,) - (IJ Do) en e. 0 < ::l -_. 0 :l -h C_. »c: ~.., en-... (1) ...... n :l ,....._. .-+ ('t) 0 en (1) -.. ~ tan ~ C ::s~ en tn ~ :s W .., C fA ..... "'" ..,)" ~ co """'I (J1 CD C ::s P+ I N en_. 0 N 0 (t) ~

N 0 o Q) o - ,_\. en tA co ...en

•

TABLES AND APPENDICES

_ ...~ '~~T I---r--~-~~~ .. U)'M (0 (I) M ...... (!) 0 N (!) (!) 0 0 co : I II) U) (0 - M N .... I'- 0) I'- 0 ~ ..- co co I'- C't") I ro N M ...... U) U) U) en I'-~T:~('t") ..- I'- 0 0 0 co co co II) II) (0 ..... co ..,.- ...- ..- N N N E ...- en U) M ~ ~ N ~ ~ ...... (]) "I\t N N LL "I\t N N ...... I I , ~---- -. (/) U) U) "it N N (!) L() L() 0) (]) 0 co V v co ..- co 0 M ...... "it (0 co L() co 0) C't") I'- < '- - or- CD ...... M N ..,.- V N (!) N N . ...c 0) co "I:t "I:t ..... 0 ..... N .c -(!) E U) M M M N C (]) I U) ._ I LL - (I)~ -- -0 Q ...... II) N N U) ..... 0 0 co ...... - co I.{) ...... I'- ~ U) Eo ...... ::J (I) "I\t co U) (0 0 (!) I.{) ...... co co ~ N co (l)N U) v v :t::: .. roo - co II) co T"'"!t-- "it N N ~ N ~ C't") N co V V ::J '- ro M II) ...... 0 .... co N -c: c.. :2: ...... M M "it N .... "C~ o I c: 0 c.. - ~I­ U N II) ...... C"') M 0 0) co C'0 0 C'0 0) co N (!) N w_ II) en II) ..... "it M 0 ('t") ..- C't") I'- V CD -q- ..- N T'" N U) 0 U) I.{) 0) I.{) I.{) ...... 0) ...c (/) co U) v v CD co '>. :r: g I'- N en N ..... N V ..- U 1,_ ..... "it M O;!: Q) "I\t CD ...... 0.(.) 0.. T'" ::s- C't") 0« (]) T'" M co ...... "it 0 0) ...... 0) 0) 0) I'- C'0 co 0,::J co 0 ...... en co 0 V ..- 0) I- 0::: ::J I- :::> :::> :::> :::> :::> :::> :::> :::> :::> :::> .!! ::s 0. u~(])-C o .:; ...... -£ z- s: N I - - a.. .- co '+-'_ 0 U l- I- I- U l- I- l- I- I- UcnoUI- ~ U U U ~ U U U U U

«- :::> ...... (/) -u ..- ·c « 2 g ...... 0 ::J E co (/) c ro 0 E E ~ (/) s: ~ (]) CtJ; g 0 :2: 00 (J) E ::J E ""0 I ·c .Q: (/) -I- :J:I .....c ~ ~ c.. co c 1-1 (]) 0 0 ro ::J ro (])- - co ro 'm ...... >- « tl! Q.. ~ C/) () ~ <.9 (/) U U cr...... ro ...... - 0 0 C/)U ~ Z i 0 L{) I'-- L{) L{) I'-- (J) CD CD (J) 0 L{) ("t') (J) CD L{) 0 N ("t') 0 ("t') 0 L{) 0 N N CD (J) (J) Q') ...... 0 CD ..- L{) ("t') CD CD 0 ("t') ..- CD I.{) (J) l"- N CD I'-- I.{) 00 00 I'-- I'-- C") N ("t') I'-- N N (J) ""'"("t') 00 L{) ""'"(J) I'-- 0 ...... I.{) ("t') N""'" I.{) ...... ""'" ("t') N ...... It) ("t') CD N ...... ""'" ...... ("t') ...... CD ""'" M ""'" ""'" ""'" ""'" N N ""'" ""'"

...... ("t') ("t') ("t') 0 00 ,.._ CD 00 0 ("t') ("t') 00 CD N ...... 00 (J) I'-- ("t') 0 (J) I'- 00 ("t') I.{) I.{) 00 ,.._ CD I.{) ...... ("t') I'-- I'-- ...... 0 ("t') N ("t') (J) ("t') L{) ...... 00 ..- ""'" ""'" N I'-- ("t') CO 0 I'-- N""'" 00 N ""'" ("t') N 0 0 ("t') ...--- ("t')""'" I'-- N CD N CD N ("t') N ..... (J) I.{) ""'" N I.{) ("t') N""'" I.{) N I'-- L{) ...--- ""'" ""It ""'" ""'" ""'" ""'" ""'" ""'" ""'" N N

...... 00 ...... (J) 00 0 (J) C") I.{) 00 (J) ("t') N (J) (J) 00 00 I.{) I.{) 00 N 00 I'-- 00 0 ..- N 0 I'-- N 00 ,.._ 00 I.{) I'-- ("t') I'-- ("t') I'-- 0 I'-- I.{) I.{) 0 N N 0 (J) 0 (J) 0 CD ...... N""'" N,.._ N ...... CD I'-- CD (J) I.{) ..- ("t') ..- I"- C'0 I.{) C'0 ...... N l"- I.{) ...... 00 CD""'" ,.._ I'-- CD I'-- ""'" ...... ;:t (J) 00 ""'" (J) ""'" I.{) ""'" ...... ""'" ""'" .;:t ""'" ""'" ""'" ""'" ..-""'"

C'0 (J) CD I'-- I'-- C'0 00 CD It) I.{) N N CD ..- 0 (J) I'-- I'-- (J) (J) I'-- C'0 00 N CD I.{) ..- I'-- N (J) 00 00 00 ""It N CD I.{) I'-- ..- C'0 I.{) C'0 (J) I'-- I'-- V ..- C'0 00 CD I'-- L{) N I'-- N I.{) NI~ 00 N CD ..- N I.{) N N CD N 00 I'-- (J) ""'" ('t') N

0 N C'0 I.{) 00 0 CD ,.._ I'-- CD I'-- N N CD N ('t') .;:t 0 .;:t 00 I"- 00 CD CD CD L{) (J) I'-- ...- CD 0 0 It) I'-- (J) I'-- C'0 I.{) C'0 ..- 0 C'0 I.{) C'0 V (J) 00 00 I'-- L{) N I'-- C'0""'" CD I.{) C'0 ..... 00 .;:t I'-- ..- ("t') CD N N CD N (J) 00 It) ""'"('t') N ""'"

C'0 ..- (J) N ...... - 00 N N N 00 (J) 00 C'0 CD ...... 0 ..- (J) C'0 I.{) 0 CD 00 N ...- I'-- CD 0 ...... I.{) 00 (J) 0 0 0 V I.{) CD ...... I'-- ..- I'-- ..- 0 L{) 00 I'-- I.{) I.{) 0 I.{) I.{) CD N (J) I.{) ..... I'-- I'-- ...... N ...... CD ...... I.{) I.{) N CO CD I'-- ...... 0 ...... CD ""'"L{) ...- ..- ""'" ..- ..-

CD ..- I'-- CD 00 0 00 N N 0 CD ..- 00 00 I'-- N CD 0 CD I'-- ..- ...... - CD I'-- ..- 00 0 I.{) ...... I'-- 00 It) N V 0 CD 0 0 (J) I.{) ..- 00 0 C'0 N C'0 N (J) ...- 0 C'0 N CD V 00 CD ..... (J) 0 L{) 0 C'0 I.{) ""'"C'0 CD 00 0') I.{) CD CD I.{) 0 CD I'-- L{) C'0 I'-- N I.{) C'0 N CO I.{) V 0') ...- N I.{) ..- N L{) N 00 CD "'lIt ""'"C'0 N

0') 0 C'0 I'-- CD ...... I.{) M C'0 V V 0 00 V V 00 CD C'0 C'0 V C'0 ...... t- 0') CD C'0 0 I'-- 00 ("t') N CD,.._ CD V 00 C'0 I.{) 00 C'0 I.{) 0') v ..- t- V N CD I"- ..- ..- 0') I'-- CD I'-- 0 ""'"0 0 C'0 I'-- CD 0 N I.{) ('t') CD 0') V 00 CD 00 ..- ""'"0') I.{) 00 I.{) N I'-- N I.{) V ('t') 0 CD I.{) 0') ...- N I.{) C'0 N CD N (J) CD It) C'0 N

I.{) ...... 0 C'0 V ...... C'0 CD It) ("t') 0 I.{) 00 CD ..- CD N N C'0 (J) ..- V N 00 0 I'-- l"- N ...... C'0 0') ...... 0 ..... 00 (J) 00 0') CD 0') N ..- ..- N ..- ...... CD L{) 00 I'-- C'0 ..- ("t') 0') C'0 ...... (J) I'-- Q') 0') I'-- I'-- ...... 0 I.{) ...... I'-- C'0 00 C'0 V N .q- CD 0 V I.{) 0 CD V I.{) ..- l"- I.{) CO ..- (J) 00 ..- N ...- I.{) ...... I.{) I.{) N I.{) I'-- ('t') ...... - Q') ...... CD I.{) ...... - ..- ......

C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C n:l n:l n:l n:l n:l n:l n:l n:l n:l n:l n:l n:l n:l n:l n:l n:l n:l n:l n:l n:l n:l n:l n:l n:l C'0 ..0,_ ..0,_ ..0,_ ..0,_ ..0,_ ..0,_ ..0,_ ..0,_ ..0,_ ..0,_ ..0,_ ..0,_ ..0,_ ..0,_ ..0,_ ..0,_ ..0,_ ..0,_ ..0,_ ..0,_ ..0,_ ..0,_ ..0,_ ..0,_ ::::> ::::> ::::> ::::> ::::> ::::> ::::> ::::> ::::> ::::> ::> ::> ::::> ::> ::::> ::> ::> ::::> ::::> ::::> ::::> ::::> ::::> ::::>

N - - t- t- t- O t- O 0 t- t- O t- t- t- t- t- t- t- O (.) 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ (.) (.) ~ (.) (.) (.) (.) (.) (.) (.)

(» 0 "'0 C_ c n:l . (» - :::J- n:l ,_t9 t9 u C) 0> . m- I - 0-0(» . C 0'0 ___ 0 ,_n:l -2 0.._... , --- 0..0 (l) "'0 C)- LL ._- 6- , ..ow -C) n:l ._ w C"O ...... (» E (» ' ~ :§ E > ..o(»- 0 "'0 Io,._ - ::> (» n:l 0 0 ,_ ._E ::S: , E (i) (» :ro- ,_ ~(» E u ~ e C"O .- :::J ~ c c n:l ,_ n:l - C"O n:l Io,._ :::J ..0 c (» - 0 0 0 n:l t:: 0 '0 :ro- rn o~ ,_ (» -n:l "'0 ~ ""S ..r::. 0 0- ::J n:l ,_ ,_ 0.. ..0 -0 "'0 (.) ..r::. ~ 0.. (» E 0.. 0:::: C"O (l) ~ t:: .- c 0.. :2:- o~ :§' :::J rn E t:: c 1:: 0 u C"O C"O n:l rn ..r::. n:l ...-.. ...-.. 0 C"O :::J 0 :::J ~ '_cu (.) ...-.. '-' ~- rn n:l (/) "'( () (/) > (.) ~ (!) (.) co > 0.. C 0.. (.) co en 0 0.. I~ cu >- .- .- ...-.. ...-.. £l. n:l ..0 -> - > U "'0 , J -- (J) N r--. CD V N (J) "t- "- 00 CO I'- 0 (J) L{) I'- N L{) L{) CO "- 00 M CO It) e CO N ('f) 'o:t (J) I'- CO ...- ...- CO V (J) V (J) 0 ('f) ...... I'- N CO CD M 00 V 0 M 0 <.0 L{) ...... (J) L{) ('f) L{) ...- 0 ...- "- (J) I'- ...- CO CO 0 'o:t ..- N V M 00 ('f) ...- ('f) ...- ('f) N ...- "- N V N I.() ('f) -ex) -r--. - M ('f) M N N ..q- ex) ~ ...- ('f) 00 en ('f) ...- L{) 0 00 0 (J) ..q- L{) I'- ('f) 00 (J) V CD r--. ex) "t- I.() <.0 ...- N 0 0 N ..q- V ..q- 0 (J) CO N ...- N ('f) N ...- CD CD (J) "t- ('f) I'- N e CO L{) (J) 00 00 ..q- (J) 00 <.0 l{) "- L{) ..q- 00 ..- CO ..q- M It) ...- ('f) CO CO ...- ..q- ...- ('f) ...-- ..q- N ...- 00 N V N <.0 V N en M ~ ..q- M (V') N - CD It) e L{) L{) ...... e 0 (J) ..- I'- 00 (J) V ...- ...... N 00 V <.0 N 0 It) ..q- N ('f) 00 L{) ,... 0 I'- (J) L{) l{) 0 l{) (J) 0 N ...-- <.0 ...-- 0 0 -It) ex) CD ~ N ...- N M ...- V L{) ...... 0 N ..q- 00 <.0 00 N ..q- <.0 "- ...-- r--. N ..q- en,... ('f) <.0 0 "t-,... ()) 00 ('f) ...... ('f) 00 l{) ('f) l{) ..q- CO L{) N 00 t- ..q- ...... -- LO ...-- ...- . -..q- - N ..q- N N CO ...... - ('f) ~ 0 ('f) ...- (J) N ...- (J) V ('f) 00 <.0 <.0 <.0 ('f) (J) t- N ~ (J) L{) ('f) ~ I'- <.0 ...- ('f) V L{) (J) 00 ...... 0 I'- 0 ...- 0 CD It) It) ...- ('f) 0 e 0 <.0 ('f) ..q- N <.0 V N ...- ('f) <.0 ('f) I'- <.0 en M r--. It) LO ...- It) V ...- -M en -- () It) 0 It) CD N ..q- 00 e I'- LO 00 L{) (J) 00 ...... V N V ..q- N N V ro CO CO 0 N (J) ('f) (J) It) N (J) N ()) l{) <.0 00 ...... (J) ...... <.0 ('f) ...... - ;t: N 00 M N r-..:.. ..q- 0 ~ V <.0 ('f) ..q- N <.0 LO N N ('f) I'- ('f) I'- <.0 M ..q- (J) CD L{) ...-- It) V ..- c M - -- c ~ en N r--. ,...~ (J) LO ...- ~ ...... 00 (J) ..q- ...- (J) <.0 00 L{) N 0 00 00 I'- 0 r--. It) N ,... CO 00 ('f) en ()) L{) ('f) ('f) 0 ...- 00 L{) <.0 00 ..q- ('f) 00 ...- ..c ...... It) ex) r--. (J) I'- ...-- ~ V ('f) CO ()) LO ('f) 0 LO ..q- <.0 ..q- <.0 ..q- N ..q- t- CD "t- O N e CO ...- ...-- ...- N ...- ...- ...-- en CD N M "t- ...- "t- c CD CD O CD ..q- N ('f) (J) N CD V ...- ...- <.0 ...-- ..- 0 ..- I'- V I'- ...- N V .0 trl (J) r--. ,...CD LO 0 N en CO I'- CO ...- CO V I'- 0 ('f) ('f) L{) <.0 ...- 0 If) 0 en LO N ...-,.._ N LO N V N L{) N 0 V ..q- 0 N I'- ...- ...... (]) CO (J) 0 CO CO L{) ('f) CD CO L{) N L{) N L{) ..q- N 0 ('f) <.0 ('f) 00 L{) > -It) ~ ~ ('f) CO -M V ...- ro N ..c -- (]) (J) N ,... N LO ('f) CD ()) ('f) v ,.._ CO N N ...-- ...- V I'- N <.0 CO 0 M CD N ('f) (J) 00 en N ..q- N -.;t (J) 00 00 ('f) <.0 N N ,.._ ('f) (J) E -It) ex) CD en L{) ('f) V e CO I'- L{) ()) N <.0 N V 0'> ...- N N I'- ..- ...... L{) r--. r--. en It) ...- ..q- 00 CO ()) L{) N -.;t N L{) ..q- N 0 ('f) <.0 ('f) I'- <.0 ...... (J) N CD It) L{) ~ (V') ...- en N ...... i.t= - (]) It) - L{) ..q- L{) (V') L{) ('f) (J) ('f) ..q- (V') CD en N V N N 00 00 00 0 en It) M CO 00 0 0 en (J) ...- 00 <.0 L{) N L{) C") m L{) 00 ('f) ..q- 0 ..c...... -It) (J) CD CD 0 <.0 CO M (V') 0 (J) ...- 00 (J) ('f) 00 ('f) ...-- -.;t 0 00 0'> ...... V CD t- CO ~ ,.._ ,.._ L{) ~ CO ...-- V 0 V 0 00 V ...- <.0 N ,.._ L{) ...-- It) N e (J) ...-- en ,.._ ..- ...- ..- N ...- ...-- ...-- 0 CO "t- '+- It) N M en en::::J c:: c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c -ca ca ell ell ell ell ell ell ell ell ell ell ell ell <0 ell ell ell ell ell ell (]) ('f) .5 .... .e ..0 ..0 ..0 ..0 ..0 ..0 ..0 ..0 ..0 ..0 ..0 ..0 ..0 ..0 ..0 ..0 ..0 ..0 (.) 0 ::::s ...... -e ...... I-- 0:: ::J :::> :::> :::> :::> :::> :::> :::> :::> :::> :::> :::> ::> :::> :::> :::> :::> :::> :::> :::> "I"-" m m - "I"-" N - 0 ...... 0 I-- I-- 0 l- I-- l- I- l- I- I- 0 0 I- 0 0 (]) ¢:! I ::2! 0 0 ::2! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ::2! ::2! ::2! 0 ::2! ::2! ro "'0 (]) ell ...... -C\:l ..... ro 0 (]) e? (.) ...... "'( ell () I 0 2 .r; I-- 0 .r::. C\:l ell <0 Q) C\:l C\:l C\:l ::J ell ::J ::J ell E C/) § C/) C/) ::J .... ::2! 0 E' ::2! z "'( co ~ a 0 en a 0 0 0 0 0 ..- ca ..- ..- ..- U) ::2 ell :0 ::2 ell ..0 (.) I ~I c L~m

I

N I W ..J aJ« I-

I ('f) 00 ..- co ('f) 0> a 0> 0""" a I'­ I'- ..- L() co a co L() 00 co a co ('f) I'- <.0 00""" co L() N a I'- ('f) co I'- 0 ('f) N I'- N L() ",,"N""" <.0 ('f) ('f) ,.- """ <.0

c o N <.0 <.0 0'> ..- co :z:; O>v",," ('f) N ..­ m 0..-0> ,.- N 0'> <.0 I'- co ::l ('f)I'- ('f)N """ a. ..- """ <.0 o a...

co 0'> 0> <.0 ..- L() 0'> ('f) <.0 <.0 N """ 0> N <.0 00 00 a a co N <.0 N """ 0'> ('f) I'- c O>"-CO <.0 """ a ('f) <.0 ..- o ,..,... N-1I L() co ..- N 0'> 0'> l[) V o C"0 I'- (/) ,. J ':..:f I'- <.0 I'- <.0 L() l[) 0 0'> l[) ('f) ..- ..- a...W ,.-('f)<.O<.o

oftI o E m N ca "'Om ..c: Q)~ Q)~ m~ ftI "'O:::s..... ~ E ::l _ (/)~ _::l o o Q) m m ca ._ ca o z a... I- 001- 1-1- r-- --~~--+-4-~--+-~~--+--~-~~+--+--~+--+-~~--+-~~--+-~~--+--+--~+--+~ L() ..- N U') 00 ...- i"­ V~O

i"- 00 0> o <.D 0> ..- i"­ ON 00 N ~ v 00 o ,.- 0> ~..::t 00 ...-- 00 N ..::t i"- N 0> 000 00 N LO ...- LO LO

00 U') ..- 0> N ..::t ..-- ~ o LO LO <.D <.D U') 00 <.D 00 N N <.D N LO i"- C') N N ..-- N ..- ..- ..-

...- U') <.D i"-i"-O 0> U') ~ 00 ..-- i"­ LO 0> <.D I'- N LO CD i"- 00 0> 00 ..-­ 00 LO N LO 0 LO LO N ~ N ..- ..-

c: c: _ c: _ c: (ij(ijro ro ro ro mro ...... 0 cammm o ~ .._ O:s-e o:s-eo:s-e I-~:::> 1-0:::::::> 1-0:::::::>1-0:::::::>

o ro "'o ro E c: (.!) 0> E Q) ro o ._ ro ro ro .c: ~ ro Q) ro u ro .._~ a.~ ~~ -o~ E~ O>~ ro~ ro ~ c: ~ :::s .._ ~ Q) ~ c:_ c: ~ -_ro ro o ro -o 0- ~- ro ro roro (/)1- a.. I- en ~~ a~ (/)1- 01- I"- ' , N ' , N ' , Q) c: I"- (J) C> 0> c: 0 (J) (0 m m +=i ..-+ l!) ...... 0 m '" """" Q) c: '-_ C> """" u Q)::J:::J ...- r::: e.._ c.. Q) Q) 0 0 :'2 a.. Q_ (/)~ Q)O "'0 c: >oN o .c .... +=i CD .2: m ot;I ... a.'- ::::J C l!) l!) I"­ N (J) N 0"0 N C') ... r::: C') N """" C> C;»cu C> C> C> ..- ...- ...­ Q) Q) ...- ...- ...- ..- ...- ...- 0> .... CU,5 Q)CJ) ;1 ._r::: 0r::: r:::+=i o CU +=i"5 .!!a. ::::J 0 C') N ...­ M a. a. (J) C> CO I 0- C') l!) C> a.,5 ...-,l!) W "00 + + .....J =~ .cO m U .... ..!!! ....CU a.::::J c: 0 ~a. ... r::: a.,aQ) CU c: - ... o i~ +=im o 0 :::J ... Q) c.. 0>0> o Ci,5 a.. "Or::: CU Q) UQ) ...U "0 [ Q)"O O>r::: ,5cu r::: Q) (J --c: ...Q) ...... m m .0m a. o :::J ..... 1-0:::::::> ...... ;::o (i) cu m (5 o o <9 <9 .c .c -.....Q) m -e ...... m o o :::Jo C/) <9 z C/) (0 en 1.0 ...q en en 00 (0 ('I') N en N en ...q N ~ N en 0 1.0 ~ f'-.. 0 ~ en N en ~ 00 I 00 00 00 en 0 en en en en en en en en en en a. c :::J ctI 0 ..c.._ f'-.. 0: :::J I

CD ctI~ 0 Q) ..c 00 f'-.. ('I') (0 0 N ~ 1.0 ...q 0 N N N N C...... q ('I') 0 N ('I') ('I') 1.0 (0 (0 N en ('I') 00 N :::::I c en en en en en en en en en en en en en en 0 .- '- c ctI.._ C) 0 (0 :.+:; :::J ctI Q) a::: C) ns 9-0 Q) a. J: "'0 ('I') N N (0 en (0 ...q ('I') ...q N 0 f'-.. 0 f'-.. .-- ('I') c:: ..c ('I') ('I') 0 ~ ...q N 1.0 ...q ('I') 0 1.0 ...- f'-.. - u en en en en en en en en en en en en en en c:: '4- 0 ,2 or" _.ctI -0 0 1.0 nso :.+:; 0 "5N .._CCl .... c.ns X O~ Q) c.:::::I (/) -.::t "Cns I J: _ = .... ('I') 0 N f'-.. 1.0 (0 ...- ('I') f'-.. 00 (0 ...- 00 ...- W u_ ('I') ('I') ...q N ...q ('I') (0 en ('I') (0 00 f'-.. f'-.. N ..J u en en en en en en en 00 en 00 en en en en o 'i:: . c al CCl -o 0 ...q « ..c.._ I- - ~a :::J '-_ c >< Q) 0 Q)- :;::::; 0.5 CCl "CCI) -:::J ...- (0 N f'-.. N CO 1.0 f'-.. ...q ...q f'-.. I a. 00 0 00 c:: 0 00 f'-.. ...q en ...- ...q (0 1.0 ~ N (0 f'-.. (0 en ns a. en en en en 0 en en en 0 0 0 en en en c:: ...- ~ ...- ~ 0 CCl .._ctI :.-:; ('I') ns -0 :::J '4-- a::: :::::I 0 c. 0 0 :;::::; C. .._ctI 0 X 0 ...- ...- 1.0 00 ('I') N f'-.. N ('I') en ('I') f'-.. (0 - Q) (0 1.0 ...q 1.0 (0 V (0 ('I') f'-.. 0> ~ f'-.. (0 f'-.. 0 (/) 0> en 0> 0> en 0> 0> 0> 0> CO 0 0> 0> 0> :.-:; ..-- ns '- _.CO >< 0 N Q) I- CI)

CCl CCl ~ ctI ~ CO ~ CCl ctI :::J :::J _. ctI ctI ~ (ij ctI ~ :::J -U .::tt:. .::tt:. :::J ctI .::tt:. :::J ctI .::tt:. ctI .0;: :::J :::J .::tt:. I- :::J CCl ..-- :::J CO .::tt:. :::J CCl l- I- (/) ctI ctI CO CCl I- :::J - ctI 0 ctI I- - l- I- ctI 0 l- CCl (5 0 I- CCl I- E c (.9 .- E l- (.9 Q) E Q) 0 E N "'0 .- :::J~ _. Q) (.) -ctl Q) Q) .;:: ctI Q).::tt:. ..c ctI 0 "'0 ..c_. E Q) a. ctI ctI t:::: .._c "'0.._ :l: ..c ctI :::J .._ 0 Q) ~ c: -ctI-:::J u C c: _ctI 0 0 Q) ctI oo -CCl 0 0 0 CO :::J CO CO (/)1- (.9 Z a.. m I- m (/) a.. (j) 2 (j) a (j) t) oT- 0 N C'G oX :lI C'!l I-

--u 'I::-..... tJ) C -.....CI> .....C'!l Il) CI) I I >< W Q) _J tJ) CD "0 t: <{ C'G ..... Q) (.) t: Q) "C tn ~ >. ..c tJ) .....Q) C'G '- >. u C'G '- Q) ~ _J

o N ~NCO (J) a..

oell (9 ..c...... ::;:) o (j) Q) LO Q) Q)...--..q Q) ~~~~ ~ ~ C> ro ~ ~ ~Ot--- ~ Q)~~O ~ o ~ Q) E Q) 0> 0> 'V ~ ~'VLO~ 'V ~ LO ()) t--- t--- t--- t--- 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 u.. ~r------'r-~----4---~--+--~_+--r---~~--+-~_+----4---+-----+-~~ ~ CD t--- 0 0 'V ~Q)~~ CD 'V LO 00 >. ()) o t--- 'V C> LO OO~'V~ C> ~ 000> (.) CO o o 00 LO 0 ~~~~ t--- 00 ,.._,.._ ...-- 0> 0> (J) Q) 0> 0> Q) 0> Q) ~ ~ t--- Q) Q) 0> 1!Sr----e-----r~--~--~--oo--~oo-+~--rC>~--r-~---+~~-~-+Q)--rQ)-4--~--4-~~I--~--+~--~~~ I 0 c>..q ..q C> t--- C> C> C> ~ ~ 0 t--- LO 10 I ~ I ~ 0> LO LO LOLOC> ~ t---Q)Q)t--- 0 £:' ~ ~I;;: >< '-'I ..... V. cu I ~ 00 00 00 00 0> 00 00 00 00 00 0> • - t/) >­ ~ 0> ...-- .c L{) 00 00 0> §1i ~ 0> 0 >- , I ...-- 0't'"" --.;------i---....., ~O ,.._ t--- ...- L{) ,.._ 00 ~ ~ cuO CD CD CD 0 ~ CO 'V L() .'t:! N ~ L{) 0> L{) 00 L() 0 ,.._ T"- I ~, ~~~..q ~ ~ ,0 :;:in;o cu + + + + + ' ~ ns_ + I..CI) >< CI> Cl>.r:: Q) 00 00 ~ t/)_ 00,.._ o CD 0> CO o L() L{) ~r::: CD 00 ...-- E ~ 0'- ()) Ot/) ~ Nt/) u.. ~ ~.!! e~------~4-----~--~~+_~_4--+_--_+~~+_~_4----~_+----+__r~ (.0 010 o ~ t--- "'_~IJ') Q) ~'V'V IJ') CD 'V 00 0> IJ') ~ ~ IJ') 00 I 0lCl> CO - Q) 0'> 0'> IJ') ~ OO,.._ ~ t--- ~ 0 ~ L{) ~ ~ ~N .r:: ._ ::J CO L{) L{) LO L{) ~ ..q 00 0 L{) 0> ~ ~ W ~ ..q LO L{)LO 0> IJ')~~ ..J c.. ~~ o ~ OJ 0.0 ~~------~~----~---+_4_~~_+--_4--~~+_+_--~-+--_+~--- I..t/) L() L() 0 L() ~ ~ « e 0'> 0> 'V CD 00 CD ...­ ~O>OO~ 0'> ~ ~ 0> ..... Olr::: CD 00 00 0 CD ,.._ L{) o ...-- ~ rn 00 CDOCD 0> t--- t--- ~ o m~ ...... qt---t--­ 00 0> 00 L{) ~ ...... -- "CO ()) 00 CD o 0'> 0> CD L() ns­ a... ~ O"'C CD i CI> r::: "Cns CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO Q) t/) ...... 000 o 000 o o 0 ~ ~I (.) OlQ) .;:: (9(.9(9 (9(9(.9(9 (.9 (9 (9 (.9(.9 SE (i) ~ ..c ..c:. ..c ..c ..c:...... +oJ ...... c ..c ..c ..c ..c ..c ..c r:::O ::J ::J ::J 1:::1:::1:::1::: 1::: 1::: 1::: 1:::1::: Q) - o 000 0 o o 0 o 0 o t/) 000 m­ rn ."t:: rno CO o ..- rol(Ol(") N (0 0 0 -v ..-- N N 0> (")''''--Iro N ro-v(")..--vrol"-roOL()I"-(,,)..--oro...... N ..-(O..-(Oo>ro..-O>o)O(o('I')OI"-..­ ro o>rorol"-rororol"-I"-rororoo>roro

L() N ('I') OO>-VOL()L()-VL()(O..-(oN(o...---V N L() (") (") -v (0 -v 1"-) (") I"- 0 -v N (") N 0> I"- l() 0> ()) 0) o>orororoo>rooroo>o>o>O())O -.r- ~ ~ ~ l"­ N -v 0) + 1("') ro I'- IN 0....-0'> I'-L{)....-I'-N ...... ("')("')('1') L{) N ..q ro O..--L[)mm..-m..--mroO'>romromm o ..-- 0'> 0'>,~I ..- ..-- ..-- ..-- 1 ~ ..q ....- ro ..q ("') I'­ I I I ~ I o I : I ro m 0'> m 0'> CO ro : I ..-- L{) 0 L{) ("') N L{) ("') ...- N ..-- ..-- ("') N + I + + +1+ +1 + 1 i I r---- (J) ..q- ("') ro 0 ro ...- m I'- ..q N I'- m ....- I'- ro 0 ..-- ro I'- I'- ...- l"- I'- <0 m CO ('I') CO ('I') <0 ("') ("') L{) ..q- CO ..c ..q- ro ...- 0 ro I'- 0 ("') 0 <0 I'- ..q <0 L{) <0 L{) 0 L{) ..q ..-- <0 I'- ("') ..q- ..q- ("') ("') ("') ("') ("') N N N N N N N I'- NNN o ..q w~I~1 c:: o N c:: I 3: ..-- I <0 L{) ..-- N L{) N N ("') ..q ..q- <0 <0 ..-- ..q- <0 L{) 0 CO ..- ..-- o O>~ ro N ro ro ("') I'- I'- ("') N N ..-- 0 N I'- I'- ..q ("') m ('I') 0 ..c 0>0'> ....- ro ..q- N 0 N N m ..-- 0 eo 0 ro ro <0 I'- 0'> N ..q NI (J) ..-- 0'> L() 0 ..q- V ..q- ..q- ("') ("') N ("') ("') N ("') N N N N <0 N N N ,_ ..-- L() I c:: Q) .Ec:: I Q) (/) (/) ..0 (/) c:: 0, eo m N ("') ("') ..-- 0 ro <0 ("') L() N ..-- V L{) ..-- m N 0 Q) ro 3: <0 m 0> L{) ....- ("') I'- N L!) 0 L!) I'- L!) ..-- ("') eo ..- L{) ('I') N > (.) 0 L() ("') ("') ("') L{) ..q- ("') ro ("') ..q- <0 CO 0> 0 ..- I'- V V N 0 ro ro Q) ...... I'- eo eo ro I'- I'- <0 <0 <0 L() L() L() L{) L{) L() L() V ..q- VIV ..c ..-- N Q) 0'> Q) 'w ..c E ...... '+=, ro ...... ,_ 0 CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO ro ro ro ro ro CO ,_(J) o (/) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (/) (9 (9 (9 (9 (9(9 (9(9(9 (9(9(91(91(9 (9 (9 (9 (9 i+= -c:: ro Q) 0- ("') .- (.) ..c ..c ..c ..c ..c..c ..c..c..c ..c ..c ..c ..c ..c ...... I ...... c..cl..cl..c+-' ...... ~ ...... , ..c...., ...... ::::;): ,_ ,_ ::::;): ,_ ,__ "- '-- '- L.. ,_ ,_ ...... ro Q) '- t ::::;): '- ::::;): ::::;): ,_ - N 0 0 0 0 o 0 000 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ::::::'i ._ Z Z C/) Z C/)Z ZIZ Z Z Z Z C/) C/) Z .E Q.(/) (/) o (J) ::::;): _Q...c...... (/) C o 0 l- I- I- 0 1-1- 1-1-1-1-1- 0 l- I- l- Q) Q) ...... N ...... C) r 0 0 0 ~ 00 01~0 00000 ~ 0 0 0 :I~I~ o ..-- ~ .~ - 1--- - 0'> ..c"C r--r--- 0'> ~ (5 1 o (.) ,_ .._ (.) ...... _ Q) C)ro 0 ¢::: - ...... 0 ro ro ::::::'i 0 "C (/) 0 .- L() ill c::"C 0> ...... Q) Q) I C ro o~ 0'> Q) I ,_ 0'> ctl I ro ,_ ,_ 0 - 1 ..c (.) 0'> I ...... 2 3: I ~ ...- I (J) (/) c:: 0 <:;( I C c:: I (J) 0 Q) , Q) 3: Q) Q) 0 (J) __J ..c Q) "0 E E -t:: "'- 12 o 1-..0 L{) Q) lctl Q) I I- ~ E til C (J) ctl~::::SE --- CO ..c 0 ~ - Q.. Q) >- "E 121 "("- -N (J) (J) >~ 0 .s;; '0 (.) E ~ ~ I ~ ctl ::::s ctl ~ C (J) :3:: "C Q. ·c 0 c Q) g; Q) 0 ctl ,_ (J) C ctl ~ (J) (J) 0 C .- "0 .QJ 0 C ::::;):- ro (3 ro 3: c:: W ctl ro ..c C/) ro -0 ~ rol- ro (.9<:;( co 6C>O& ctl I­ 'm 0 C/) > 0 a.. C/) 0 01- (I) OL{) a::: --..- .--.- >- ~ ~I o ..- > .:; "> -.:; x :~ :~,'x S< -("') --. Z >:::.. -- - -> - - -x 'x --I >- - '-'I'-, )("r'"" Q)O tn O >oN .0 CI).... tn"C Q) .... -0 n:!_ ... CtI .2:!u =:i:i "CCI) 1::.0 CD n:! CtI J:

I COo.1_ W OCtl ...J 0.1::::l._ al ...O"C CI) « tno) I- I I:: Q) CtI c 0 tn .... o l- n:! ... -..::; Q) C'G ro "Il""" .r:.tn I - I:: >< ._I:: 03= C 1:: .... .-0 "C Z -I:: W ~C'G Q. ::l tn Q. O._o.CI) « o..~ "C<"'> =-..s:::::1:: u Q) ~"C I:: I:: ._o CI)c.. CUCl) -"C ::l I:: 0.- 0 a.. I - Oc '+- 3: Q)r­o 0 E ro Z 00 ..... NO ..... LOCOCD(J)LOI'-t--LOCDLO(J)O 00 (J)t--(J)LOO('t)CO('t)(J)CO(J) ..... t--N(J)...­ «:tCD ('t)t--t--(J)...-COOOOCOLO('t)...-t--I'-(J) COLO ..-..-CO..-«:tNN«:tN(\")..-N«:t('l')N..- N

('t)CDN('t)CO(J)NCOCDCO('t)('t) CO('t) «:t(J)LO(J)CON COCOCDLO(J) ..... CO('t)I'-('t)N('t)OCOOO(J)LO...-CO ..... CD N ~ t-- ..- N CO N CD1«:tIN ~ ('t) LO N ..... V LO ..... N

- --- r------r--~-~~~-~-r-- ~ OCDCOV ..... LOCOVCO ..... t--OONO(J) CD (J) ..... CD COv(J)I'-COt--COLOLOOLO N(J)Nt-- ..... NO('t)CONLO ..... LOLON

t--(J)OONCO('t)CO(J)OOCDONOO..-N..-OOCD('t)..-CO...­ (J)COLO(J)O..-('t)Ot--COVNCD('t)COLOLOCO..-I'-COO ~""'(J)('t)LOt--LO""'LOOO ..... «:t(J)V"-CDNLOO(J)O(J)LO '-000..- CD..- ..-..- N..-..-..- ...-

or- t-­ ('t)t--N«:tO"-O...-.....-CO""'­ ('t) LO t--('t)N('t)..-OI'-(J).....-t--CO CD' N OOt--..-O«:t'<;J"O('t)OCOLO N CD ('t)NI'-('t)LON ..... LOLO('t)N I

I-- --t en No'o~l~o~~O'O~o~I~I~OO,~~:~'~:O·~[ ..c _:~co~~oo~~o~ooo~~oooo~o j o l.- ....e> o:::J CIJ Q) I I "0 ::::I (.) C

CO 0 CO CO 22Zo.. ~--~---.----~--~ o C} ..... o o N s:::: tn s:::: ~ o I--... :ro-:ro­ (1) c: c: ro 1.'0 ..s:::: c..c...... o ..s::::.... 'j '"0 c: (l) 0 '0 (1) 2' +::; ...- 0') (l) ro 0') ...... El ~ ::JO') ex) "I : : CD (1) E ..... W Q) L_____~"'- -~~~t-~~~~-+~~~~~~~~~ ....J Q) m ..... « o I u.~-:::O').~ 2 :5 .~ en ...... °~ : : ... ~ - (/)00"- I- tn s:::: ------~--+--+----~~-+-~~~~+-~~-- o ~ l- o I-- I '0 ~ ~ N (l) o.2l I '0 I s:::: E- (!) (l) : : [I co >< ..... o C o i- r-~: ~ I ~. ~-----l- Z N W s:::: 0.. 0.. '0 (1) I I I « !E t;--rf ~ ~ ~ tn tn ~- i I co .... I U (1) '0 ~ (l) ::> 'o::t I Q) .....Q) o i ,~~i~'O~_~~:5_-+I-+~~~'~+~~_:~--+1_~ ___ j - 1 tn '"0..... s:::: £1.'0 ~ ::J 0 OC) .s (/) ~I ~ M, I~ I l~ -....o (l)u~-~~-~+-~-- ---~~--~ tn o u~(l)c: ..- I ....J :~ ~ £ ::: c: 0') IN ~ ~ o~ ~ ° ~ '0 .8 .- ~ i ° I ° 1- rl--:5--~-----t-I-t----+-1----+-----~+c

~ ~ 1"-1 ~ ~ 1 LlI __~______j._L~ ___: _ ___j______O:::_i ___ -=o:_____1 o lO N

or- N 0r- 0'> O ('I") or- or- N N I'- N ~ + or- + + + or- cO .- 0 eN 3:~ N 00> +-' 0> Q)....- £Q)_ "0 o ro f/) U f/) Q) ro"O -Q) U..r:. Q)+-' N_ o lO I'- <0 1...­ ·w 0 'l'"" o o ..- o lor- +-' or- ..- Q) U o N o ..r:.Q) o co +-'0.. N 0'> ..- ...- I ..- o f/) 'l'"" +-' Q) CO C)"­ 0') C C 'l'"" "Ef/) r:: o ::J U f/) o U c ..... ';j ro Q) I ns ...... 0 W :::l ::J _J a. 00; tIl o c "00'> a. o Q)...- « :.+::i I- r:: ro ..- ~ C ns 0'> o .- .c ::J 0'> 3:"0 ... 0.. ..- :::l o C C ,(L Q) ro o Q)or­ - .00'> .r:: 0'> N Q)O'> <0 0'> <0 <0 >"7 i 1'- 0> N ~ N roor­ o ..­ lO 0'> N ('I") ..r:. ... ..- N ('I") ('I") ..- (!) N cO'> I 0"­ :.+::iQ) 1-----+---+--+---+---1--+--+--+---+-+--+---+--1----+--+----1 ro"O -ro ::J U 0..Q) 8.."0 -Q) O..r:. Q)::: 10 0 "- ..r:.t5 ~~ o f/) c,~ -ro ._c f/) f/) C ::J Q) f/) y c "- Q)

f/) 20 Q) .-c ..- Q)OO 'l'"" - ~ - - > > ..r:.0> ro f/) f/) f/) 1-"- If/) f/) f/) o ro ro UJ !O o I­ I~ il o Z