New Zealand's Loranthaceous Mistletoes Was Very Limited

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

New Zealand's Loranthaceous Mistletoes Was Very Limited New Zealand’s loranthaceous mistletoes Proceedings of a workshop hosted by Threatened Species Unit, Department of Conservation, Cass, 17 – 20 July 1995 Edited by Peter J. de Lange and David A. Norton Published by Department of Conservation P.O. Box 10-420 Wellington, New Zealand 3 ã June 1997, Department of Conservation ISBN 0-478-01906-8 Cataloguing-in-Publication data New Zealand’s loranthaceous mistletoes : proceedings of a workshop hosted by Threatened Species Unit, Department of Conservation, Cass, 17 –20 July 1995 / edited by Peter J. de Lange and David A. Norton. Wellington, N.Z. : Dept. of Conservation, 1997. 1 v. ; 30 cm. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0478019068 1. Mistletoes- -New Zealand. 2. Loranthaceae. I. De Lange, Peter James. II. Norton, David A. (David Andrew), 1958– III. New Zealand. Threatened Species Unit. 583.940993 20 zbn97-052606 4 Contents INTRODUCTION 7 1. PAST AND PRESENT DISTRIBUTION OF NEW ZEALAND MISTLETOES 9 Historical distribution of New Zealand loranthaceous mistletoes 11 Status of loranthaceous mistletoes in the Northland Conservancy 23 Status of loranthaceous mistletoes in the Auckland Conservancy 27 Status of loranthaceous mistletoes in the Waikato Conservancy 31 Status of loranthaceous mistletoes in the Bay of Plenty Conservancy 35 Status of loranthaceous mistletoes in the Tongariro-Taupo Conservancy 39 Status of loranthaceous mistletoes in the East Coast Conservancy 43 Status of loranthaceous mistletoes in the Wanganui Conservancy 47 Status of loranthaceous mistletoes in the Hawke’s Bay Conservancy 51 Status of loranthaceous mistletoes in the Wellington Conservancy 55 Status of loranthaceous mistletoes in the Nelson-Marlborough Conservancy 59 Past and present distribution of mistletoes on the West Coast 67 Status of loranthaceous mistletoes in the Canterbury Conservancy 71 Mistletoes in Otago 75 Status of loranthaceous mistletoes in the Southland Conservancy 79 2. ECOLOGY OF NEW ZEALAND MISTLETOES 81 An annotated checklist of New Zealand mistletoe (Loranthaceae) hosts 83 Host specificity and spatial distribution patterns of mistletoes 105 Reproductive ecology of the loranthaceous mistletoes of New Zealand 111 Some aspects of reproduction and possum control of five loranthaceous mistletoes in the central North Island and comparisons with South Island studies 115 Mistletoe moths 125 Population biology of Australian mistletoes 133 3. THREATS TO NEW ZEALAND MISTLETOES 139 Evidence for the impacts of possums on mistletoes 141 An assessment of possum (Trichosurus vulpecula) impacts on loranthaceous mistletoes 149 Decline of New Zealand loranthaceous mistletoes — a review of non-possum (Trichosurus vulpecula) threats 155 Discussion of threats to mistletoes 165 5 4. CURRENT STATUS AND MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS 169 Conservation status of New Zealand loranthaceous mistletoes: a comment on the application of IUCN Threatened Plant Committee Red Data Book Categories 171 Discussion on status of mistletoes 179 5. CURRENT MANAGEMENT 181 Mistletoe management, Tongariro-Taupo Conservancy 183 Mistletoe protection and monitoring strategies on the West Coast 187 Monitoring a population of Ileostylus micranthus near Wanganui 193 Propagation of mistletoes in the central North Island 197 Discussion on management techniques 201 6. DEVELOPMENT OF A MISTLETOE STRATEGY 203 Discussion on the development of a mistletoe strategy 205 7. BIBLIOGRAPHY OF NEW ZEALAND MISTLETOES 209 Annotated bibliography for New Zealand viscaceous and loranthaceous mistletoes 211 8. APPENDICIES Appendix 1: Mistletoe workshop programme 223 Appendix 2: Mistletoe workshop attendants 225 6 Introduction The loranthaceous mistletoes of New Zealand have long been recognised as attractive, unusual and valued components of our forest flora. Few people will forget the sight of a beech (Nothofagus) forest at the height of summer when the beech mistletoes Alepis and Peraxilla are in full bloom. So spectacular are these flowers, that a small sprig of one of these species, the scarlet mistletoe (Peraxilla colensoi), was selected to grace the front of our former $2 note. This act is the only instance where a nationally listed threatened plant species has been depicted on New Zealand currency. Unfortunately, the reasons behind the choice of flower had little to do with raising public awareness of the need to conserve mistletoes, but rather was a recognition of the flower’s beauty. So it is perhaps today a matter of some irony that at the time of the change to decimal currency, this mistletoe, along with our other Loranthaceae, was a common species, and that now scarlet mistletoe, like the $2 note it once graced, is fast becoming a curiosity of the past. During the 1980s, the decline of our more visible loranthaceous mistletoes became a matter for public concern, culminating in 1985 with the publication of a review article in the popular Forest & Bird journal by Colin Ogle and Peter Wilson entitled “Where have all the mistletoes gone?”. This article prompted widespread national interest in the perceived loss of these showy flowers from the beech forests, and also drew attention to the fact that in many parts of New Zealand the presence of any mistletoe was in itself unusual. The article also prompted a return to researching the biology, anatomy, ecology and physiology of these species, while renewing interest in the possible cause(s) of mistletoe decline, or indeed whether such a decline was really occurring. In 1993 the growing level of interest in the indigenous loranthaceous mistletoes was resulting in problems over the manner in which conservation efforts should be directed, what the research priorities were, and whether they were truly as threatened as the IUCN listings given them by the New Zealand Threatened Plant committee implied. Following on from these wider issues was the need to bring together the wealth of information being gathered on our indigenous mistletoes. The Threatened Species Unit (TSU) of the Department of Conservation was approached to facilitate a workshop to address mistletoe conservation. What resulted was a four day workshop held at the University of Canterbury field station at Cass in July 1995. Invited speakers gave lectures on aspects of mistletoe biology and management, while a breakdown of mistletoe distribution and status was given for each of the Department of Conservation’s 14 conservancies. Discussions followed each session and a plan for a national mistletoe strategy developed. As a result of this gathering it was agreed that the papers presented and accounts given should be published in a proceedings. This publication is the product of this agreement. Both David and I would like to acknowledge the considerable efforts of Suzanne Clegg (formerly of TSU) in helping facilitate the workshop, and Lynette Clelland (S&R editing) for undertaking the final formatting and editing of the following publication. Ian Mackenzie (S&R editing) designed the frontispiece. Peter J. de Lange & David A. Norton (editors) 16 May 1996 7 Part 1 Past and present distribution of New Zealand mistletoes 8 Historical distribution of New Zealand loranthaceous mistletoes Peter J. de Lange Science & Research Division, Department of Conservation, Private Bag 68908, Newton, Auckland David A. Norton Conservation Research Group, School of Forestry, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch Brian P.J. Molloy Research Associate, Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research, Private Bag 69, Lincoln SUMMARY Seven species of loranthaceous mistletoes have been recorded from New Zealand since 1769. These belong to the endemic genera (numbers of accepted species in brackets): Alepis (1), Peraxilla (2), Trilepidea (1) and Tupeia (1). Two other genera, Ileostylus (1) and Muellerina (1) are indigenous to New Zealand, with Ileostylus a near-endemic known elsewhere only from Norfolk Island, while Muellerina celastroides is a possible vagrant from eastern Australia where it is common. 1. INTRODUCTION To determine the historical distribution of all seven indigenous loranthaceous taxa we conducted an extensive search of all New Zealand herbaria (and several overseas institutions). The result is a comprehensive database and associated atlas showing the distribution and extent of loranthaceous decline in New Zealand since 1769 (P.J. de Lange, D.A. Norton & B.P.J. Molloy, unpubl. data). In this paper we summarise some of the main points obtained from our research for this atlas. For convenience we follow the vernaculars suggested by Molloy (1990) e.g., those mistletoes which primarily parasitise beech (Nothofagus) are referred to collectively as “beech mistletoes”, namely Alepis, Peraxilla; while those which are usually associated with seral vegetation and lowland or coastal forest are treated here as “leafy mistletoes”, namely Ileostylus, Muellerina, Trilepidea and Tupeia. de Lange, P.J., Norton, D.A., Molloy, B.P.J. Historical distribution of New Zealand loranthaceous mistletoes. Pp. 11–22 in de Lange, P.J. and Norton, D.A. (Eds) 1997. New Zealand’s loranthaceous mistletoes. Proceedings of a workshop hosted by Threatened Species Unit, Department of Conservation, Cass, 17–20 July 1995. The following notes summarise our understanding of the historical distribution of each of the loranthaceous mistletoe species. Maps showing the distributions derived from herbarium records are appended. 10 2. THE BEECH MISTLETOES Alepis flavida (yellow mistletoe; Fig. 1) This species has been collected from the North and South Islands. In the North Island, it appears to have
Recommended publications
  • Toward a Resolution of Campanulid Phylogeny, with Special Reference to the Placement of Dipsacales
    TAXON 57 (1) • February 2008: 53–65 Winkworth & al. • Campanulid phylogeny MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS Toward a resolution of Campanulid phylogeny, with special reference to the placement of Dipsacales Richard C. Winkworth1,2, Johannes Lundberg3 & Michael J. Donoghue4 1 Departamento de Botânica, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, Caixa Postal 11461–CEP 05422-970, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. [email protected] (author for correspondence) 2 Current address: School of Biology, Chemistry, and Environmental Sciences, University of the South Pacific, Private Bag, Laucala Campus, Suva, Fiji 3 Department of Phanerogamic Botany, The Swedish Museum of Natural History, Box 50007, 104 05 Stockholm, Sweden 4 Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology and Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University, P.O. Box 208106, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8106, U.S.A. Broad-scale phylogenetic analyses of the angiosperms and of the Asteridae have failed to confidently resolve relationships among the major lineages of the campanulid Asteridae (i.e., the euasterid II of APG II, 2003). To address this problem we assembled presently available sequences for a core set of 50 taxa, representing the diver- sity of the four largest lineages (Apiales, Aquifoliales, Asterales, Dipsacales) as well as the smaller “unplaced” groups (e.g., Bruniaceae, Paracryphiaceae, Columelliaceae). We constructed four data matrices for phylogenetic analysis: a chloroplast coding matrix (atpB, matK, ndhF, rbcL), a chloroplast non-coding matrix (rps16 intron, trnT-F region, trnV-atpE IGS), a combined chloroplast dataset (all seven chloroplast regions), and a combined genome matrix (seven chloroplast regions plus 18S and 26S rDNA). Bayesian analyses of these datasets using mixed substitution models produced often well-resolved and supported trees.
    [Show full text]
  • NEWSLETTER NUMBER 84 JUNE 2006 New Zealand Botanical Society
    NEW ZEALAND BOTANICAL SOCIETY NEWSLETTER NUMBER 84 JUNE 2006 New Zealand Botanical Society President: Anthony Wright Secretary/Treasurer: Ewen Cameron Committee: Bruce Clarkson, Colin Webb, Carol West Address: c/- Canterbury Museum Rolleston Avenue CHRISTCHURCH 8001 Subscriptions The 2006 ordinary and institutional subscriptions are $25 (reduced to $18 if paid by the due date on the subscription invoice). The 2006 student subscription, available to full-time students, is $9 (reduced to $7 if paid by the due date on the subscription invoice). Back issues of the Newsletter are available at $2.50 each from Number 1 (August 1985) to Number 46 (December 1996), $3.00 each from Number 47 (March 1997) to Number 50 (December 1997), and $3.75 each from Number 51 (March 1998) onwards. Since 1986 the Newsletter has appeared quarterly in March, June, September and December. New subscriptions are always welcome and these, together with back issue orders, should be sent to the Secretary/Treasurer (address above). Subscriptions are due by 28th February each year for that calendar year. Existing subscribers are sent an invoice with the December Newsletter for the next years subscription which offers a reduction if this is paid by the due date. If you are in arrears with your subscription a reminder notice comes attached to each issue of the Newsletter. Deadline for next issue The deadline for the September 2006 issue is 25 August 2006 Please post contributions to: Joy Talbot 17 Ford Road Christchurch 8002 Send email contributions to [email protected] or [email protected]. Files are preferably in MS Word (Word XP or earlier) or saved as RTF or ASCII.
    [Show full text]
  • Mccaskill Alpine Garden, Lincoln College : a Collection of High
    McCaskill Alpine Garden Lincoln College A Collection of High Country Native Plants I/ .. ''11: :. I"" j'i, I Joy M. Talbot Pat V. Prendergast Special Publication No.27 Tussock Grasslands & Mountain Lands Institute. McCaskill Alpine Garden Lincoln College A Collection of High Country Native Plants Text: Joy M. Tai bot Illustration & Design: Pat V. Prendergast ISSN 0110-1781 ISBN O- 908584-21-0 Contents _paQ~ Introduction 2 Native Plants 4 Key to the Tussock Grasses 26 Tussock Grasses 27 Family and Genera Names 32 Glossary 34 Map 36 Index 37 References The following sources were consulted in the compilation of this manual. They are recommended for wider reading. Allan, H. H., 1961: Flora of New Zealand, Volume I. Government Printer, Wellington. Mark, A. F. & Adams, N. M., 1973: New Zealand Alpine Plants. A. H. & A. W. Reed, Wellington. Moore, L.B. & Edgar, E., 1970: Flora of New Zealand, Volume II. Government Printer, Wellington. Poole, A. L. & Adams, N. M., 1980: Trees and Shrubs of New Zealand. Government Printer, Wellington. Wilson, H., 1978: Wild Plants of Mount Cook National Park. Field Guide Publication. Acknowledgement Thanks are due to Dr P. A. Williams, Botany Division, DSIR, Lincoln for checking the text and offering co.nstructive criticism. June 1984 Introduction The garden, named after the founding Director of the Tussock Grasslands and Mountain Lands Institute::', is intended to be educational. From the early 1970s, a small garden plot provided a touch of character to the original Institute building, but it was in 1979 that planning began to really make headway. Land­ scape students at the College carried out design projects, ideas were selected and developed by Landscape architecture staff in the Department of Horticul­ ture, Landscape and Parks, and the College approved the proposals.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamics of Even-Aged Nothofagus Truncata and N. Fusca Stands in North Westland, New Zealand
    12 DYNAMICS OF EVEN-AGED NOTHOFAGUS TRUNCATA AND N. FUSCA STANDS IN NORTH WESTLAND, NEW ZEALAND M. C SMALE Forest Research Institute, Private Bag, Rotorua, New Zealand H. VAN OEVEREN Agricultural University, Salverdaplein 11, P.O. Box 9101, 6700 HB, Wageningen, The Netherlands C D. GLEASON* New Zealand Forest Service, P.O. Box 138, Hokitika, New Zealand and M. O. KIMBERLEY Forest Research Institute, Private Bag, Rotorua, New Zealand (Received for publication 30 August, 1985; revision 12 January 1987) ABSTRACT Untended, fully stocked, even-aged stands of Nothofagus truncata (Col.) Ckn. (hard beech) or N. fusca (Hook, f.) Oerst. (red beech) of natural and cultural origin and ranging in age from 20 to 100 years, were sampled using temporary and permanent plots on a range of sites in North Westland, South Island, New Zealand. Changes in stand parameters with age were quantified in order to assess growth of these stands, and thus gain some insight into their silvicultural potential. Stands of each species followed a similar pattern of growth, with rapid early height and basal area increment. Mean top height reached a maximum of c. 27 m by age 100 years. Basal area reached an equilibrium of c. 41 m2/ha in N. truncata and 46 m2/ha in N. fusca as early as age 30 years. Nothofagus truncata stands had, on average, a somewhat lower mean diameter at any given age than N. fusca stands, and maintained higher stockings. Both species attained similar maximum volume of c. 460 m3/ha at age 100 years. Keywords: even-aged stands; stand dynamics; growth; Nothofagus truncata; Nothofagus fusca.
    [Show full text]
  • Dieback in New Zealand Nothofagus Forests!
    Pacific Science (1983), vol. 37, no. 4 © 1984 by the University of Hawaii Press. All rights reserved Dieback in New Zealand Nothofagus Forests! J. A. WARDLE 2 and R. B. ALLEN 2 ABSTRACT: Dieback has been observed in New Zealand Nothofagus forests for some time, and a number of causal factors have been recognized. Some understanding of the effects of dieback on forest structure has been gained in a study of events after snowfalls had caused partial damage to an area of mountain beech forest. The results of this study are used to interpret the structure of beech forests elsewhere in New Zealand. Nothofagus FORESTS in New Zealand are branch ofthe Rakaia River in inland Canter­ generally associated with mountain environ­ bury. These forests, which clothe the upper ments and are consequently subjected to valley between 650 m altitude and the sub­ frequent disturbance, often ofclimatic origin. alpine timberline at about 1350 m, cover an The effects of these are usually local and area of 5000-6000 ha. The forest is simple contained, but sometimes a relatively minor monotypic Nothofagus solandri var. cliffort­ event may predispose the forest to damage by ioides (Hook. f.) Poole (mountain beech) and other, often biotic, agents causing extensive there are virtually no other tree species dieback of the forest canopy. As yet, there is (Figure 1). little information on the long-term effect of Two hundred and seventeen permanent 2 canopy dieback on forest structure or on the plots, each 400 m , were established through­ characteristics that make one stand vulner­ out the Harper forests during the 1970-1971 able and another not.
    [Show full text]
  • Scanned Document
    UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL PAULISTA “JÚLIO DE MESQUITA FILHO” unesp INSTITUTO DE BIOCIÊNCIAS – RIO CLARO PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM CIÊNCIAS BIOLÓGICAS (BIOLOGIA VEGETAL) DIFERENCIAÇÃO INTRAESPECÍFICA NA REPRODUÇÃO E INTERAÇÕES PLANTA-POLINIZADOR EM POPULAÇÕES NATURAIS DE TREMBLEYA LANIFLORA (MELASTOMATACEAE) Natalia Costa Soares Tese apresentada ao Instituto de Biociências do Câmpus de Rio Claro, Universidade Estadual Paulista, como parte dos requisitos para obtenção do título de doutor em Ciências Biológicas (Biologia Vegetal). Natalia Costa Soares DIFERENCIAÇÃO INTRAESPECÍFICA NA REPRODUÇÃO E INTERAÇÕES PLANTA-POLINIZADOR EM POPULAÇÕES NATURAIS DE TREMBLEYA LANIFLORA (MELASTOMATACEAE) Tese apresentada ao Instituto de Biociências do Câmpus de Rio Claro, Universidade Estadual Paulista, como parte dos requisitos para obtenção do título de doutor em Ciências Biológicas (Biologia Vegetal). Orientador (a): Prof. Dr. Leonor Patrícia Cerdeira Morellato Co-orientador: Prof. Dr. Marcio Silva Araújo RIO CLARO 2017 581.5 Soares, Natalia Costa S676d Diferenciação intraespecífica na reprodução e interações planta-polinizador em populações naturais de Trembleya laniflora (melastomataceae) / Natalia Costa Soares. - Rio Claro, 2017 134 f. : il., figs., gráfs., tabs., fots. Tese (doutorado) - Universidade Estadual Paulista, Instituto de Biociências de Rio Claro Orientadora: Leonor Patrícia Cerdeira Morellato Coorientador: Marcio Silva Araújo 1. Ecologia vegetal. 2. Interações planta-animal. 3. Interações planta-polinizador. I. Título. Ficha Catalográfica
    [Show full text]
  • Arachnid Ecology in New Zealand, Exploring
    1 Arachnid ecology in New Zealand, exploring 2 unknown and poorly understood factors. 3 James Crofts-Bennett. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 “A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the degree of Master of Science [1] in Botany [2] at the 21 University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand” 22 2020 23 1 24 Index 25 26 Abstract………………………………………………………………………………………5. 27 Chapter 1. Introduction……………………………………………………………………...7. 28 1.1 The importance of spiders………………………………………………………...7. 29 1.2 The influence of habitat structural complexity on spider distribution and 30 abundance…………………………………………………………………………......8. 31 1.3 Invasive rodents in the context of New Zealand Araneae………………………...9. 32 1.4 Thesis structure and aims………………………………………………………..14. 33 Chapter 2. The effect of habitat structural complexity on spider abundance and diversity..15. 34 2.1 Introduction ……………………………………………………………………..15. 35 Figure 2.1: Seasonal deciduous vegetation cover…………………………...16. 36 Figure 2.2: Seasonal deciduous vegetation cover with mistletoe parasites…16. 37 2.2 Methods…………………………………………………………………………17. 38 Figure 2.3: Examples of foliage samples……………………………………18. 39 Table 2.1: Sampling locations, dates and host data…………………………19. 40 2.2.1 Statistical Analyses……………………………………………………………20. 41 2.3 Results…………………………………………………………………………...20. 42 Figure 2.4: Total invertebrates sampled in summer, plotted………………..22. 43 Figure 2.5: Total invertebrates sampled in winter, plotted………………….23. 44 Table 2.2: Paired t-tests of host plant invertebrate populations……………..25. 45 2.4 Discussion……………………………………………………………………….26. 46 Chapter 3. A novel non-kill Araneae trap: test with regards to vegetation type versus 47 location 48 effects………………………………………………………………………………………..28. 49 3.1 Introduction……………………………………………………………………...28.
    [Show full text]
  • 1999 New Zealand Botanical Society
    NEW ZEALAND BOTANICAL SOCIETY NEWSLETTER NUMBER 57 SEPTEMBER 1999 New Zealand Botanical Society President: Jessica Beever Secretary/Treasurer: Anthony Wright Committee: Bruce Clarkson, Colin Webb, Carol West Address: c/- Canterbury Museum Rolleston Avenue CHRISTCHURCH 8001 NEW ZEALAND Subscriptions The I999 ordinary and institutional subs are $18 (reduced to $15 if paid by the due date on the subscription invoice). The 1999 student sub, available to full-time students, is $9 (reduced to $7 if paid by the due date on the subscription invoice). Back issues of the Newsletter are available at $2.50 each from Number 1 (August 1985) to Number 46 (December 1996), $3.00 each from Number 47 (March 1997) to Number 50 (December 1997), and $3.75 each from Number 51 (March 1998) onwards. Since 1986 the Newsletter has appeared quarterly in March, June, September and December. New subscriptions are always welcome and these, together with back issue orders, should be sent to the Secretary/Treasurer (address above). Subscriptions are due by 28 February of each year for that calendar year. Existing subscribers are sent an invoice with the December Newsletter for the next year's subscription which offers a reduction if this is paid by the due date. If you are in arrears with your subscription a reminder notice comes attached to each issue of the Newsletter. Deadline for next issue The deadline for the December 1999 issue (Number 58) is 26 November 1999. Please forward contributions to: Dr Carol J. West, c/- Department of Conservation PO Box 743 Invercargill Contributions may be provided on an IBM compatible floppy disc (Word) or by e-mail to [email protected] Cover Illustration Plagiochila ramosissima with antheridial branches.
    [Show full text]
  • Peraxilla Colensoi
    Peraxilla colensoi COMMON NAME Scarlet mistletoe, korukoru, pirita, roeroe SYNONYMS Elytranthe colensoi (Hook.f.) Engl. Loranthus colensoi Hook. f. FAMILY Loranthaceae AUTHORITY Peraxilla colensoi (Hook.f.) Tiegh. FLORA CATEGORY Vascular – Native ENDEMIC TAXON Yes ENDEMIC GENUS Yes Peraxilla colensoi, Catlins. Photographer: John Barkla ENDEMIC FAMILY No STRUCTURAL CLASS Trees & Shrubs - Dicotyledons NVS CODE PERCOL CHROMOSOME NUMBER 2n= 24 CURRENT CONSERVATION STATUS 2012 | At Risk – Declining | Qualifiers: CD PREVIOUS CONSERVATION STATUSES 2009 | At Risk – Declining | Qualifiers: CD 2004 | Gradual Decline BRIEF DESCRIPTION Fleshy shrub to 3m wide growing on outer branches of beech trees with glossy green fleshy paired leaves and masses of red tubular flowers. Leaves to 8cm long, smooth with a red edge. Flowers to 2.5cm long. Fallen petals litter forest floor under plants. Fruit yellow. Photographer: Brian Molloy DISTRIBUTION North and South Island, but common only in southern parts of the South Island. HABITAT A parasite mainly found in silver beech forest but has been recorded on 16 host species (9 exotic) in New Zealand including red beech and black beech. Tui (Prosthemadera novaeseelandiae) and bellbird (Anthonis melanura) disperse this species in the North Island. FEATURES A shrub up to 3 m across. It parasitises further out on branches of its host than Peraxilla tetrapetala. The veins on leaves are hardly evident and only the midrib is conspicuous. Leaf tips are never notched and the leaves themselves are large and never blistered. The leaves sit in pairs on opposite sides of the stem and are thick and have a leathery texture. Leaf margins are usually smooth with red slightly rough margins.
    [Show full text]
  • Explosive New Zealand Mistletoe Example, 4 of 7 Flowers on Sheet AK103910)
    SCIENTIFIC CORRESPONDENCE pattern, as do herbarium sheets (for Explosive New Zealand mistletoe example, 4 of 7 flowers on sheet AK103910). Trilepidea almost certainly SIR- Many flowers of the mistletoe arium sheets show an even more special­ had more complex explosive flowers than Peraxilla tetrapetala (Loranthaceae) in New ized explosive mechanism than in Peraxilla. Peraxilla. Such specialization may have Zealand open from the bottom (f in the We discovered explosive flower opening rendered Trilepidea more sensitive to figure) rather than the top (d); Kuijtl called in both endemic New Zealand Peraxilla reduced bird densities due to introduced this an "unsolved mystery ... we cannot species when we noted that flower buds mammalian predators, contributing to its even guess at the meaning of this bizarre bagged for hand pollination almost never rapid and puzzling5 decline. performance." Here we report that flower opened (3/394 for P. tetrapetala, 1/82 for P. Explosive flower opening is well known buds of P. tetrapetala and P. colensoi open colensoi). The petals remained fused at the in other mistletoes6, including many of from the top only when twisted by top, while eventually undergoing abscis­ the 230 species in Africa3, and a few a bird, a form of 'explosive' flower open­ sion from their base (fin the figure). Field species in India7, Java, New Guinea and ing common in Africa but previously observations of unbagged flowers revealed South America1•6. However, this is the unknown in Australasia. Kuijt's "bizarre that they were opened by two native first report from Australasia. The New performance" is simply the consequence of honeyeaters (Meliphagidae ): tuis (Pros­ Zealand flora generally displays few flowers not being visited by birds.
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous Plant Naming and Experimentation Reveal a Plant–Insect Relationship in New Zealand Forests
    Received: 23 February 2020 Revised: 10 August 2020 Accepted: 25 August 2020 DOI: 10.1111/csp2.282 CONTRIBUTED PAPER Indigenous plant naming and experimentation reveal a plant–insect relationship in New Zealand forests Priscilla M. Wehi1,2 | Gretchen Brownstein2 | Mary Morgan-Richards1 1School of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Palmerston North, Abstract New Zealand Drawing from both Indigenous and “Western” scientific knowledge offers the 2Manaaki Whenua Landcare Research, opportunity to better incorporate ecological systems knowledge into conserva- Dunedin, New Zealand tion science. Here, we demonstrate a “two-eyed” approach that weaves Indige- Correspondence nous ecological knowledge (IK) with experimental data to provide detailed and Priscilla M. Wehi, Manaaki Whenua comprehensive information about regional plant–insect interactions in Landcare Research, 764 Cumberland New Zealand forests. We first examined Maori names for a common forest Street, Dunedin 9053, New Zealand. Email: [email protected], tree, Carpodetus serratus, that suggest a close species interaction between an [email protected] herbivorous, hole-dwelling insect, and host trees. We detected consistent – Funding information regional variation in both Maori names for C. serratus and the plant insect Foundation for Research, Science and relationship that reflect Hemideina spp. abundances, mediated by the presence Technology; Royal Society of New Zealand of a wood-boring moth species. We found that in regions with moths C. serratus trees are home to more weta than adjacent forest species and that these weta readily ate C. serratus leaves, fruits and seeds. These findings con- firm that a joint IK—experimental approach can stimulate new hypotheses and reveal spatially important ecological patterns.
    [Show full text]
  • Breeding Systems and Reproduction of Indigenous Shrubs in Fragmented
    Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the permission of the Author. Breeding systems and reproduction of indigenous shrubs in fragmented ecosystems A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy III Plant Ecology at Massey University by Merilyn F Merrett .. � ... : -- �. � Massey University Palrnerston North, New Zealand 2006 Abstract Sixteen native shrub species with various breeding systems and pollination syndromes were investigated in geographically separated populations to determine breeding systems, reproductive success, population structure, and habitat characteristics. Of the sixteen species, seven are hermaphroditic, seven dioecious, and two gynodioecious. Two of the dioecious species are cryptically dioecious, producing what appear to be perfect, hermaphroditic flowers,but that functionas either male or female. One of the study species, Raukauaanomalus, was thought to be dioecious, but proved to be hermaphroditic. Teucridium parvifolium, was thought to be hermaphroditic, but some populations are gynodioecious. There was variation in self-compatibility among the fo ur AIseuosmia species; two are self-compatible and two are self-incompatible. Self­ incompatibility was consistent amongst individuals only in A. quercifolia at both study sites, whereas individuals in A. macrophylia ranged from highly self-incompatible to self-compatible amongst fo ur study sites. The remainder of the hermaphroditic study species are self-compatible. Five of the species appear to have dual pollination syndromes, e.g., bird-moth, wind-insect, wind-animal. High levels of pollen limitation were identified in three species at fo ur of the 34 study sites.
    [Show full text]