And Pinyon Conglomerate (Uppermost Cretaceous and Paleocene), Northwestern Wyoming

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

And Pinyon Conglomerate (Uppermost Cretaceous and Paleocene), Northwestern Wyoming Harebell Formation (Upper Cretaceous) and Pinyon Conglomerate (Uppermost Cretaceous and Paleocene), Northwestern Wyoming GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 734-A Prepared in cooperation with the Geological Survey of Wyoming and the Department of Geology of the University of Wyoming Harebell Formation (Upper Cretaceous) and Pinyon Conglomerate (Uppermost Cretaceous and Paleocene), Northwestern Wyoming By J. D. LOVE GEOLOGY OF GOLD-BEARING CONGLOMERATES IN NORTHWESTERN WYOMING GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 734-A Prepared in cooperation with the Geological Survey of Wyoming and the Department of Geology of the University of Wyoming The gold-bearing Harebell Formation and Pinyon Conglomerate contain many cubic miles of quartzite conglomerate from the now-buried Targhee uplift UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1973 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ROGERS C. B. MORTON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. 72-600308 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price: paper cover ?1 domestic postpaid, or 75 cents GPO Bookstore Stock Number 2401-00316 CONTENTS Page Page Abstract _________________________________________ Al Harebell Formation Continued Introduction _____________________________________ 1 Interpretation of depositional environment _____ A32 Purpose of report _____________________________ 1 Pinyon Conglomerate _____________________ 33 History of investigation _______________________ 3 Name and definition ____________________ 33 Acknowledgments _____________________________ 4 Harebell Formation _______________________________ 7 Distribution and thickness ________________ 33 Name and definition ________________ _ 7 Lithology ___________________________ 33 Distribution and thickness _____________________ 7 Stratigraphic and structural relations _______ 41 Lithology ____________________________________ 7 Age and correlation ___________________ 45 Bobcat Member __________________________ 17 Gold occurrences _____________________ 48 Stratigraphic and structural relations __________ 24 Influence of Targhee, Washakie, and Basin Creek Age and correlation ___________________________ 27 Gold occurrences ______________________ 27 uplifts on Pinyon sedimentation __________ 48 Targhee uplift source of quartzite conglomerate Interpretation of depositional environment_____ 52 and gold ____________________________ 27 References cited _________________________ 52 ILLUSTRATIONS FIGURE 1. Geologic map showing outcrops of Pinyon Conglomerate and Harebell Formation, Jackson Hole and page vicinity, Wyoming __________________________________________________ A3 2. Index map showing mountains, basins, and other features surrounding Jackson Hole __________ 4 3. Relief map showing outline of geologic map area and relation of sections of Pinyon Conglomerate and Harebell Formation to regional features _______________________________________ 5 4. Map showing location of sections of Pinyon Conglomerate and Harebell Formation ____________ 7 5. Photograph showing type section of Harebell Formation ______________________________ 8 6. Map showing location of type section of Bobcat Member of Harebell Formation ________________ 9 7. Sections of Pinyon Conglomerate and Harebell Formation ______________________________ 10 8-12. Photographs: 8. Harebell Formation near Whetstone Falls ___________________________________ 16 9. Harebell Formation, East Fork of Pilgrim Creek ______________________________ 20 10. Closeup of conglomerate and sandstone in Harebell Formation _ __________________ 22 11. Conglomerate and sandstone in the Harebell Formation near Mytilus Zone ____________ 23 12. Dinosaur-bearing sandstone overlying conglomerate of the Harebell Formation __________ 24 13. Restored section D-D', southeastern Jackson Hole ___________________________________ 25 14. Block diagram of northwestern Wyoming showing geology at beginning of deposition of Harebell Formation ____________________________________________________ 26 15. Block diagram of northwestern Wyoming during deposition of Harebell Formation _____________ 28 16. Restored section F-F' ______________________________________________________ 30 17. Restored section, northern Yellowstone Park to Jackson Hole______________________-_____ 32 18. Oblique aerial photograph of Pinyon Peak area ________________ ___________________ 34 19. Section E-E' showing relation of Pinyon Conglomerate to type Harebell Formation ___________ 37 20. Photograph showing coal member of Pinyon Conglomerate_____________________________ 38 21. Cross section C-C' north of Mount Leidy _____________________________________ 38 22-32. Photographs: 22. Closeup of Pinyon Conglomerate _________________________________________ 39 23. Big quartzite boulder in Pinyon Conglomerate ________________________________ 40 24. Pinyon Conglomerate on Madison Limestone _________________________________ 41 25. Pinyon Conglomerate on northwest side of Teton Range________________________ 42 26. Contact between Pinyon Conglomerate and Cleverly and Morrison(?) Formations at Mount Sheridan _____________________________________________________ 43 III IV CONTENTS FIGURES 22-32. Photographs Continued Page 27. Pinyon Conglomerate and Harebell Formation on southwest face of Gravel Mountain A 43 28. Angular unconformity between Pinyon Conglomerate and Harebell Formation 45 29. Intertongued sandstone and conglomerate on Purdy Creek 45 30. Pinyon Conglomerate in "Narrows" of South Fork of Fish Creek 46 31. South Fork of Fish Creek 47 32. Pinyon Conglomerate and younger rocks, mouth of Devils Basin Creek 48 33. Cross sections A-A' and B-B', Gravel Ridge and Gravel Peak 49 34. Restored section from the Targhee uplift to Washakie Range __ - ___ - 49 35. Block diagram of northwestern Wyoming and adjacent areas showing geology at beginning of 50 36. Block diagram of northwestern Wyoming and adjacent areas during deposition of Pinyon Conglomerate- 51 52 TABLES Page TABLE 1. Comparison of data for Harebell Formation and Pinyon Conglomerate A14 2. Estimated volumes of unnermost Cretaceous and Paleocene sediments 29 GEOLOGY OF GOLD-BEARING CONGLOMERATES IN NORTHWESTERN WYOMING HAREBELL FORMATION (UPPER CRETACEOUS) AND PINYON CONGLOMERATE (UPPERMOST CRETACEOUS AND PALEOCENE), NORTHWESTERN WYOMING ByJ. D. LOVE ABSTRACT west and northwest of the Teton Range, beneath what is now the Snake River downwarp. The quartzite terrane of Pre- The Harebell Formation of Late Cretaceous age crops out cambrian and possibly Ordovician age in this uplift had an in an area of 265 sq mi (square miles) in Jackson Hole, north­ areal extent of 1,000 sq mi and provided a volume of quart­ western Wyoming, and has a maximum thickness of about zite conglomerate of 135 cu mi (cubic miles) to the Harebell 11,000 feet. The Pinyon Conglomerate of latest Cretaceous Formation and 425 cu mi to the Pinyon Conglomerate. Of and Pal eocene age crops out in an area of 150 sq mi and has this, 40 cu mi of conglomerate in the Harebell Formation and a maximum thickness of about 3,775 feet. Both formations 35 cu mi in the Pinyon are preserved in Jackson Hole. contain thick zones of quartzite conglomerate from the same The climate during deposition of both the Harebell and source; for this reason they are so similar that they have the Pinyon was humid and warm. Large swift rivers flowed frequently been misidentified. No type section or reference east and southeast from the Targhee uplift into Jackson section has previously been designated for either formation. Hole. Deposition was rapid in most places. Marine- or This report summarizes a comparison of differences and brackish-water incursions from the southeast were common similarities of both formations and designates and presents while the Harebell Formation was being deposited but ceased a type section for the Harebell Formation and its con­ prior to deposition of the Pinyon Conglomerate. Volcanism glomeratic Bobcat Member (a new name) and a principal north and possibly northwest of Jackson Hole contributed reference section for the Pinyon Conglomerate. The chief much tuffaceous debris to the Harebell but little or none to differences between the two formations are in color, indura­ the Pinyon. tion, and amount of volcanic debris. The Harebell is olive drab, has the greater induration, and contains abundant volcanic debris, especially in the northern sections. The Pinyon INTRODUCTION is light gray to light brown, has the lesser induration, and contains inconspicuous volcanic debris. A coal member, 50- PURPOSE OF REPORT 140 feet thick, of early Paleocene age, is at the base of the Pinyon in the southeastern part of Jackson Hole. There is no The purpose of this report is to summarize new such coal in the Harebell Formation. data, as well as old but previously unpublished data, Structural relations between the Pinyon and Harebell range on the Harebell Formation and Pinyon Conglomerate from an angular unconformity of nearly 90° west of the Buffalo Fork thrust fault to near parallelism in the Box Creek in northwestern Wyoming as an aid in distinguish­ downwarp. During deposition of the Harebell Formation, even ing them in field mapping. The Harebell Formation in its uppermost part, brackish water repeatedly invaded crops out in an area of about 265 sq mi (square the area. When the youngest strata were deposited, the oldest miles), and the Pinyon Conglomerate crops out in were 11,000 feet below sea level in the Box Creek
Recommended publications
  • PARK 0 1 5 Kilometers S Ri South Entrance Road Closed from Early November to Mid-May 0 1 5 Miles G Ra River S Access Sy
    To West Thumb North Fa r ll ve YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK 0 1 5 Kilometers s Ri South Entrance Road closed from early November to mid-May 0 1 5 Miles G ra River s access sy ad Grassy Lake L nch Ro a g Ra Reservoir k lag e F - Lake of Flagg Ranch Information Station R n the Woods to o Road not recommended 1 h a Headwaters Lodge & Cabins at Flagg Ranch s d for trailers or RVs. Trailhead A Closed in winter River G r lade C e access re e v k i R SS ERNE CARIBOU-TARGHEE ILD Glade Creek e r W Trailhead k Rive ITH a Falls n 8mi SM S NATIONAL FOREST 13km H Indian Lake IA JOHN D. ROCKEF ELLER, JR. D E D E J To South Bo C Pinyon Peak Ashton one C o reek MEMORIAL PARKWAY u 9705ft lt er Creek Steamboat eek Cr Mountain 7872ft Survey Peak 9277ft 89 C a n erry re B ek o z 191 i 287 r A C o y B o a t il e eek ey r C C r l e w e O Lizard C k r k Creek e e e re k C k e e r m C ri g il ly P z z ri G Jackson Lake North Bitch Overlook Cre ek GRAND BRIDGER-TETON NATIONAL FOREST N O ANY k B C ee EB Cr TETON WILDERNESS W Moose Arizona Island Arizona 16mi Lake k e 26km e r C S ON TETON NY o A u C t TER h OL C im IDAHO r B ilg it P ch Moose Mountain rk Pacic Creek k WYOMING Fo e Pilgrim e C 10054ft Cr re e Mountain t k s 8274ft Ea c Leeks Marina ci a P MOOSE BASIN NATIONAL Park Boundary Ranger Peak 11355ft Colter Bay Village W A k T e E N e TW RF YO r O ALLS CAN C O Colter Bay CE m A ri N g Grand View Visitor Center il L PARK P A Point KE 4 7586ft Talus Lake Cygnet Two Ocean 2 Pond Eagles Rest Peak ay Lake Trailhead B Swan 11258ft er lt Lake o Rolling Thunder
    [Show full text]
  • Jackson Hole Vacation Planner Vacation Hole Jackson Guide’S Guide Guide’S Globe Addition Guide Guide’S Guide’S Guide Guide’S
    TTypefypefaceace “Skirt” “Skirt” lightlight w weighteight GlobeGlobe Addition Addition Book Spine Book Spine Guide’s Guide’s Guide’s Guide Guide’s Guide Guide Guide Guide’sGuide’s GuideGuide™™ Jackson Hole Vacation Planner Jackson Hole Vacation2016 Planner EDITION 2016 EDITION Typeface “Skirt” light weight Globe Addition Book Spine Guide’s Guide’s Guide Guide Guide’s Guide™ Jackson Hole Vacation Planner 2016 EDITION Welcome! Jackson Hole was recognized as an outdoor paradise by the native Americans that first explored the area thousands of years before the first white mountain men stumbled upon the valley. These lucky first inhabitants were here to hunt, fish, trap and explore the rugged terrain and enjoy the abundance of natural resources. As the early white explorers trapped, hunted and mapped the region, it didn’t take long before word got out and tourism in Jackson Hole was born. Urbanites from the eastern cities made their way to this remote corner of northwest Wyoming to enjoy the impressive vistas and bounty of fish and game in the name of sport. These travelers needed guides to the area and the first trappers stepped in to fill the niche. Over time dude ranches were built to house and feed the guests in addition to roads, trails and passes through the mountains. With time newer outdoor pursuits were being realized including rafting, climbing and skiing. Today Jackson Hole is home to two of the world’s most famous national parks, world class skiing, hiking, fishing, climbing, horseback riding, snowmobiling and wildlife viewing all in a place that has been carefully protected allowing guests today to enjoy the abundance experienced by the earliest explorers.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Natural Areas on National Forest System Lands in Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Utah, and Western Wyoming: a Guidebook for Scientists, Managers, and Educators
    USDA United States Department of Agriculture Research Natural Areas on Forest Service National Forest System Lands Rocky Mountain Research Station in Idaho, Montana, Nevada, General Technical Report RMRS-CTR-69 Utah, and Western Wyoming: February 2001 A Guidebook for Scientists, Managers, and E'ducators Angela G. Evenden Melinda Moeur J. Stephen Shelly Shannon F. Kimball Charles A. Wellner Abstract Evenden, Angela G.; Moeur, Melinda; Shelly, J. Stephen; Kimball, Shannon F.; Wellner, Charles A. 2001. Research Natural Areas on National Forest System Lands in Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Utah, and Western Wyoming: A Guidebook for Scientists, Managers, and Educators. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-69. Ogden, UT: U.S. Departmentof Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 84 p. This guidebook is intended to familiarize land resource managers, scientists, educators, and others with Research Natural Areas (RNAs) managed by the USDA Forest Service in the Northern Rocky Mountains and lntermountain West. This guidebook facilitates broader recognitionand use of these valuable natural areas by describing the RNA network, past and current research and monitoring, management, and how to use RNAs. About The Authors Angela G. Evenden is biological inventory and monitoring project leader with the National Park Service -NorthernColorado Plateau Network in Moab, UT. She was formerly the Natural Areas Program Manager for the Rocky Mountain Research Station, Northern Region and lntermountain Region of the USDA Forest Service. Melinda Moeur is Research Forester with the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain ResearchStation in Moscow, ID, and one of four Research Natural Areas Coordinators from the Rocky Mountain Research Station. J. Stephen Shelly is Regional Botanist and Research Natural Areas Coordinator with the USDA Forest Service, Northern Region Headquarters Office in Missoula, MT.
    [Show full text]
  • The Geologic Time Scale Is the Eon
    Exploring Geologic Time Poster Illustrated Teacher's Guide #35-1145 Paper #35-1146 Laminated Background Geologic Time Scale Basics The history of the Earth covers a vast expanse of time, so scientists divide it into smaller sections that are associ- ated with particular events that have occurred in the past.The approximate time range of each time span is shown on the poster.The largest time span of the geologic time scale is the eon. It is an indefinitely long period of time that contains at least two eras. Geologic time is divided into two eons.The more ancient eon is called the Precambrian, and the more recent is the Phanerozoic. Each eon is subdivided into smaller spans called eras.The Precambrian eon is divided from most ancient into the Hadean era, Archean era, and Proterozoic era. See Figure 1. Precambrian Eon Proterozoic Era 2500 - 550 million years ago Archaean Era 3800 - 2500 million years ago Hadean Era 4600 - 3800 million years ago Figure 1. Eras of the Precambrian Eon Single-celled and simple multicelled organisms first developed during the Precambrian eon. There are many fos- sils from this time because the sea-dwelling creatures were trapped in sediments and preserved. The Phanerozoic eon is subdivided into three eras – the Paleozoic era, Mesozoic era, and Cenozoic era. An era is often divided into several smaller time spans called periods. For example, the Paleozoic era is divided into the Cambrian, Ordovician, Silurian, Devonian, Carboniferous,and Permian periods. Paleozoic Era Permian Period 300 - 250 million years ago Carboniferous Period 350 - 300 million years ago Devonian Period 400 - 350 million years ago Silurian Period 450 - 400 million years ago Ordovician Period 500 - 450 million years ago Cambrian Period 550 - 500 million years ago Figure 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 17. Quartzite Gravel Northwest Wyoming
    Chapter 17 Quartzite Gravel of Northwest Wyoming The quartzites of southwest Montana and adjacent Idaho extend eastward into Wyoming1 in a semi-continuous belt, as shown on Figure 16.1 of the previous chapter. This chapter will describe those deposits. Quartzite Gravel Lag John Hergenrather and I have found scattered surficial quartzites from near Interstate 15 in northeastern Idaho, just south of Lima, Montana, eastward to the northern Teton Mountains and over a four-wheel drive pass between Yellowstone and Grand Teton National Parks. These quartzites seem to have mostly formed a thin layer or lag deposit on the surface or were reworked by local mountain glaciation. This lag rep- resents the red hashed area in Figure 16.1. Quartzites on Top of the Northern Teton Mountains Probably the most fascinating quartz- ite location is on top of the northern Teton Mountains! Brent Carter and I took a Figure 17.1. Slightly dipping limestone at the top three day round trip hike to the top of Red of Red Mountain. Mountain in the northern Teton Moun- tains, 10,177 feet (3,102 m) msl!2,3 Red Mountain and Mount Moran (12,605 feet, 3,842 m msl) represent remnants of a flat-topped planation surface.2 Red Mountain is composed of slightly tilted limestones (Figure 17.1), while Mount Moran is composed of granite or gneiss with a 50-foot (15 m) thick cap of Flathead Sandstone on top (see Figure 33.7). The quartzites on top of Red Mountain are mainly a thin lag mixed with angular lime- stone cobbles and boulders (Figure 17.2).
    [Show full text]
  • Yellowstone National Park Geologic Resource Evaluation Scoping
    Geologic Resource Evaluation Scoping Summary Yellowstone National Park This document summarizes the results of a geologic resource evaluation scoping session that was held at Yellowstone National Park on May 16–17, 2005. The NPS Geologic Resources Division (GRD) organized this scoping session in order to view and discuss the park’s geologic resources, address the status of geologic maps and digitizing, and assess resource management issues and needs. In addition to GRD staff, participants included park staff and cooperators from the U.S. Geological Survey and Colorado State University (table 1). Table 1. Participants of Yellowstone’s GRE Scoping Session Name Affiliation Phone E-Mail Bob Volcanologist, USGS–Menlo Park 650-329-5201 [email protected] Christiansen Geologist/GRE Program GIS Lead, NPS Tim Connors 303-969-2093 [email protected] Geologic Resources Division Data Stewardship Coordinator, Greater Rob Daley 406-994-4124 [email protected] Yellowstone Network Supervisory Geologist, Yellowstone Hank Heasler 307-344-2441 [email protected] National Park Geologist, NPS Geologic Resources Bruce Heise 303-969-2017 [email protected] Division Cheryl Geologist, Yellowstone National Park 307-344-2208 [email protected] Jaworowski Katie Geologist/Senior Research Associate, 970-586-7243 [email protected] KellerLynn Colorado State University Branch Chief, NPS Geologic Resources Carol McCoy 303-969-2096 [email protected] Division Ken Pierce Surficial Geologist, USGS–Bozeman 406-994-5085 [email protected] Supervisory GIS Specialist, Yellowstone Anne Rodman 307-344-7381 [email protected] National Park Shannon GIS Specialist, Yellowstone National Park 307-344-7381 [email protected] Savage Monday, May 16, involved a welcome to Yellowstone National Park and an introduction to the Geologic Resource Evaluation (GRE) Program, including status of reports and digital maps.
    [Show full text]
  • Uncorking the Bottle: What Triggered the Paleocene/Eocene Thermal Maximum Methane Release? Miriame
    PALEOCEANOGRAPHY, VOL. 16, NO. 6, PAGES 549-562, DECEMBER 2001 Uncorking the bottle: What triggered the Paleocene/Eocene thermal maximum methane release? MiriamE. Katz,• BenjaminS. Cramer,Gregory S. Mountain,2 Samuel Katz, 3 and KennethG. Miller,1,2 Abstract. The Paleocene/Eocenethermal maximum (PETM) was a time of rapid global warming in both marine and continentalrealms that has been attributed to a massivemethane (CH4) releasefrom marine gas hydrate reservoirs. Previously proposedmechanisms for thismethane release rely on a changein deepwatersource region(s) to increasewater temperatures rapidly enoughto trigger the massivethermal dissociationof gas hydratereservoirs beneath the seafloor.To establish constraintson thermaldissociation, we modelheat flow throughthe sedimentcolumn and showthe effectof the temperature changeon the gashydrate stability zone throughtime. In addition,we provideseismic evidence tied to boreholedata for methanerelease along portions of the U.S. continentalslope; the releasesites are proximalto a buriedMesozoic reef front. Our modelresults, release site locations, published isotopic records, and oceancirculation models neither confirm nor refute thermaldissociation as the triggerfor the PETM methanerelease. In the absenceof definitiveevidence to confirmthermal dissociation,we investigatean altemativehypothesis in which continentalslope failure resulted in a catastrophicmethane release.Seismic and isotopic evidence indicates that Antarctic source deepwater circulation and seafloor erosion caused slope retreatalong
    [Show full text]
  • Clay Minerals at the Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum: Interpretations, Limits, and Perspectives
    minerals Review Clay Minerals at the Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum: Interpretations, Limits, and Perspectives Fabio Tateo Istituto di Geoscienze e Georisorse, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (IGG-CNR) Padova, c/o Dipartimento di Geoscienze, Università di Padova, Via Gradenigo 6, I-35131 Padova, Italy; [email protected] Received: 20 October 2020; Accepted: 26 November 2020; Published: 30 November 2020 Abstract: The Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM) was an “extreme” episode of environmental stress that affected the Earth in the past, and it has numerous affinities concerning the rapid increase in the greenhouse effect. It has left several biological, compositional, and sedimentary facies footprints in sedimentary records. Clay minerals are frequently used to decipher environmental effects because they represent their source areas, essentially in terms of climatic conditions and of transport mechanisms (a more or less fast travel, from the bedrocks to the final site of recovery). Clay mineral variations at the PETM have been studied by several authors in terms of climatic and provenance indicators, but also as tracers of more complicated interplay among different factors requiring integrated interpretation (facies sorting, marine circulation, wind transport, early diagenesis, etc.). Clay minerals were also believed to play a role in the recovery of pre-episode climatic conditions after the PETM exordium, by becoming a sink of atmospheric CO2 that is considered a necessary step to switch off the greenhouse hyperthermal effect. This review aims to consider the use of clay minerals made by different authors to study the effects of the PETM and their possible role as effective (simple) proxy tools for environmental reconstructions.
    [Show full text]
  • Lakamie Basin, Wyoming
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, DIRECTOR BULLETIN 364 GEOLOGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES OF THE LAKAMIE BASIN, WYOMING A PRELIMINARY REPORT BY N. H. DARTON AND C. E. SIEBENTHAL WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1909 CONTENTS. Page. Introduction............................................................. 7 Geography ............................................................... 8 Configuration........................................................ 8 Drainage ............................................................ 9 Climate ............................................................. 9 Temperature...................................................... 9 Precipitation..................................................... 10 Geology ................................................................. 11 Stratigraphy.......................................................... 11 General relations........................../....................... .11 Carboniferous system............................................. 13 Casper formation......................... .................... 13. General character........................................ 13 Thickness ............................................... 13 Local features............................................ 14 Erosion and weathering of limestone slopes ................ 18 Paleontology and age..................................... 19 Correlation .............................................. 20 Forelle limestone............................................
    [Show full text]
  • An Inventory of Trilobites from National Park Service Areas
    Sullivan, R.M. and Lucas, S.G., eds., 2016, Fossil Record 5. New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin 74. 179 AN INVENTORY OF TRILOBITES FROM NATIONAL PARK SERVICE AREAS MEGAN R. NORR¹, VINCENT L. SANTUCCI1 and JUSTIN S. TWEET2 1National Park Service. 1201 Eye Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20005; -email: [email protected]; 2Tweet Paleo-Consulting. 9149 79th St. S. Cottage Grove. MN 55016; Abstract—Trilobites represent an extinct group of Paleozoic marine invertebrate fossils that have great scientific interest and public appeal. Trilobites exhibit wide taxonomic diversity and are contained within nine orders of the Class Trilobita. A wealth of scientific literature exists regarding trilobites, their morphology, biostratigraphy, indicators of paleoenvironments, behavior, and other research themes. An inventory of National Park Service areas reveals that fossilized remains of trilobites are documented from within at least 33 NPS units, including Death Valley National Park, Grand Canyon National Park, Yellowstone National Park, and Yukon-Charley Rivers National Preserve. More than 120 trilobite hototype specimens are known from National Park Service areas. INTRODUCTION Of the 262 National Park Service areas identified with paleontological resources, 33 of those units have documented trilobite fossils (Fig. 1). More than 120 holotype specimens of trilobites have been found within National Park Service (NPS) units. Once thriving during the Paleozoic Era (between ~520 and 250 million years ago) and becoming extinct at the end of the Permian Period, trilobites were prone to fossilization due to their hard exoskeletons and the sedimentary marine environments they inhabited. While parks such as Death Valley National Park and Yukon-Charley Rivers National Preserve have reported a great abundance of fossilized trilobites, many other national parks also contain a diverse trilobite fauna.
    [Show full text]
  • Grant Village Area Map
    Yellowstone – Grant Village & West Thumb Area GRANT VILLAGE AREA MAP Page 1 of 18 Yellowstone – Grant Village & West Thumb Area Grant Village to Old Faithful Road Map Page 2 of 18 Yellowstone – Grant Village & West Thumb Area Grant Village to Lake Vicinity Road Map Page 3 of 18 Yellowstone – Grant Village & West Thumb Area Grant Village to the South Entrance Road Map Page 4 of 18 Yellowstone – Grant Village & West Thumb Area Day Hikes Near Grant Village & West Thumb Begin your hike by stopping at a ranger station or visitor center for information. Trail conditions may change suddenly and unexpectedly. Bear activity, rain or snow storms, high water, and fires may temporarily close trails. West Thumb Geyser Basin Trail Stroll through a geyser basin of colorful hot springs and dormant lakeshore geysers situated on the scenic shores of Yellowstone Lake. Trails and boardwalks are handicapped accessible with assistance. Trailhead: West Thumb Geyser Basin, 1/4 mile east of West Thumb Junction Distance: 3/8 mile (1 km) roundtrip Level of Difficulty: Easy; boardwalk trail with slight grade as trail descends to and climbs up from the lake shore Yellowstone Lake Overlook Trail Hike to a high mountain meadow for a commanding view of the West Thumb of Yellowstone Lake and the Absaroka Mountains. Trailhead: Trailhead sign at entrance to West Thumb Geyser Basin parking area Distance: 2 miles (3 km) roundtrip Level of Difficulty: Moderate; mostly level terrain with a moderately strenuous 400-foot elevation gain near the overlook. Shoshone Lake Trail (via DeLacy Creek) Hike along a forest's edge and through open meadows to the shores of Yellowstone's largest backcountry lake.
    [Show full text]
  • High Resolution Adobe PDF
    N " 111°20'0"W 111°0'0"W 0 ' " 0 Red Butte " Henderson Peak 4 Prospect Peak S ° E 500 Temple Peak " W 3 " Thunder Mountain 3 3 4 d 21 R " " 3 0 y 0 w S DRIGGS BATES 1 E 600 GARNS MOUNTAIN W 600 S H TEMPLE PEAK HAWLEY GULCH W S 625 S S Piney Peak Red Mountain " " W 675 S 700 S W W 700 S E W Liars Peak S 0 E 0 7 Squirrel Mountain 5 7 " 4 5 5 3 5 S " Chicken Peak 0 S Natl S W 800 S Fo Wheaton Mountain Victor re " st D W !( eve " lop R S oa W ta d W 900 S 20 W Hwy 31 te 6 1 H R 3 0 w d Rocky Peak 0 0 S y W 95 y 2 3 w W 3 " W S H 1000 S 0 S 0 0 W Hwy 31 0 33 1 RQ Moose S Rd VICTOR FOURTH OF JULY PEAK STOUTS MOUNTAIN WHEATON MOUNTAIN HEISE SE d Stouts Mountain R k Rd " e lat e e F r Antelop C e Na n tl i Fo P re Fourth of July Peak P st Deve Oliver Peak in lop R e oa " C d " S r 2 w ee T A R G H E E N F 5 a k 0 n B V en R a ch d lle Rd y H w y Ross Peak d R Thompson Peak " k e re " C d ney R i a Atkinson Peak r R e 31 " b RQ h g u a r Swan Valley T !( n Palisades Peak L Little Palisades Peak o d " r R Creek u Rainey PA" LISADES PEAK b N n THOMBPalSdyO MNo uPnEtaAinK Upper Palisades Lake e SWAN VALLEY " l I r CONANT VALLEY o w POINT LOOKOUT t Little Baldy Mountain i S n " R G d d R 7 7 N 0 ¤£26 d a o I R S Windy Peak w p a lo n " Sheep Mountain e V " v a e ll M t D ey es H Ln or w rk F y Pa l O at N " d Sheep Creek Peak R Elkhorn Peak k Y e re " C p e e W h S Red Peak Rd N " ek " re ar C Needle Peak 0 e ek ' B re Elk C " 0 Big 2 ° 3 4 MOUNT BAIRD PALISADES DAM RED RIDGE COMMISSARY RIDGE CASTLE ROCK U S H Paul Peak w " y 2 6 d k R ree C A R I
    [Show full text]