DOCSLIB.ORG

Investigation of the Barrier Effects of a Strategic Fuelbreak on a Population of the Smoky Mouse at Mt Terrible, Victoria

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Investigation of the Barrier Effects of a Strategic Fuelbreak on a Population of the Smoky Mouse at Mt Terrible, Victoria Investigation of the barrier effects of a strategic fuelbreak on a population of the Smoky Mouse at Mt Terrible, Victoria P. W. Menkhorst and P. V. Macak January 2013 Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research Unpublished Internal Report for Fire Branch, Department of Sustainability and Environment Investigation of the barrier effects of a strategic fuelbreak on a population of the Smoky Mouse at Mt Terrible, Victoria Peter Menkhorst and Phoebe Macak Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research 123 Brown Street, Heidelberg, Victoria 3084 January 2013 Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research Department of Sustainability and Environment Heidelberg, Victoria Report produced by: Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research Department of Sustainability and Environment PO Box 137 Heidelberg, Victoria 3084 Phone (03) 9450 8600 Website: www.dse.vic.gov.au/ari © State of Victoria, Department of Sustainability and Environment 2013 This publication is copyright. Apart from fair dealing for the purposes of private study, research, criticism or review as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced, copied, transmitted in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical or graphic) without the prior written permission of the State of Victoria, Department of Sustainability and Environment. All requests and enquiries should be directed to the Customer Service Centre, 136 186 or email [email protected] Citation: Menkhorst, P.W. and Macak, P,V. (2013) Investigation of the barrier effects of a strategic fuelbreak on a population of the Smoky Mouse at Mt Terrible, Victoria. Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research Unpublished Internal Report for Fire Branch, Department of Sustainability and Environment, Heidelberg, Victoria Disclaimer: This publication may be of assistance to you but the State of Victoria and its employees do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence which may arise from you relying on any information in this publication. Accessibility: If you would like to receive this publication in an accessible format, such as large print or audio, please telephone 136 186, or through the National Relay Service (NRS) using a modem or textphone/teletypewriter (TTY) by dialling 1800 555 677, or email [email protected] Front cover photo: The strategic fuelbreak on the northern ridge of Mt Terrible, October 2010 (Peter Menkhorst). Printed by: NMIT Printroom, 77 St Georges Rd, Preston 3072 Contents List of tables and figures ..................................................................................................................vi Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................................... vii Summary ............................................................................................................................................ 1 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 2 1.1 The Issue ................................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 The Smoky Mouse .................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Project Aims ............................................................................................................................. 3 2 Methods .................................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Locating a study population ...................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Study area description ............................................................................................................... 5 2.3 Capture and Marking ................................................................................................................ 7 2.4 Radio-tracking .......................................................................................................................... 8 3 Results .................................................................................................................................... 11 3.1 Trapping .................................................................................................................................. 11 3.2 Radio-tracking ........................................................................................................................ 13 4 Discussion .............................................................................................................................. 16 4.1 Movements revealed by trapping and radio-tracking.............................................................. 16 4.2 Likely impacts of the fuelbreak on population processes ....................................................... 16 4.3 Trapping rates ......................................................................................................................... 17 4.4 Other natural history information gleaned from the study ...................................................... 17 References ........................................................................................................................................ 18 List of tables and figures List of tables Table 1. Field trips conducted during the investigation of the impacts of strategic fuelbreaks on the Smoky Mouse at Mt Terrible. .................................................................................................. 9 Table 2. Details of each Smoky Mouse captured and marked at Mt Terrible, 2010-2011 ............... 12 Table 3. Numbers of detected fuelbreak crossings by radio-collared Smoky Mice. ........................ 14 Table 4. Locations of radio-tagged Smoky Mice during night-time tracking sessions in relation to the daytime nest site used the day before ............................................................................... 14 List of figures Figure 1. Smoky Mouse Pseudomys fumeus trapped at Mt Terrible, May 2010 ............................... 3 Figure 2. Study location ..................................................................................................................... 4 Figure 3. Map of study area showing all trapping grids used, and Smoky Mouse nesting sites ........ 5 Figure 4. Strategic fuelbreak passing through Eucalyptus rubida Montane Dry Woodland at the Mt Terrible study site, May 2010, two years after construction of the fuelbreak .......................... 6 Figure 5. Typical Eucalyptus dives Montane Dry Woodland in the north-western part of the study area, with the Mt Terrible Track visible on the right ............................................................... 6 Figure 6. Smoky Mouse 0-1 showing indentifying ear tattoos ........................................................... 7 Figure 7. Radio collar package used in this study ............................................................................ 10 Figure 8. Smoky Mouse with radio-collar attached ......................................................................... 10 Figure 9. Radio-tracking to locate daytime nesting sites.................................................................. 11 Figure 10. Entrance to Smoky Mouse nest hole, Mt Terrible, October 2011 ................................... 15 vi Acknowledgements This project was commissioned and funded by the Land and Fire Management Branch of DSE. It was overseen by a Project Control Group comprising Aaron van Winden (Chair), Al Beaver, Gordon Friend, Richard Loyn, Stephen Platt, Mario Malovic (Melbourne Water) and John Wright (Parks Victoria). Colleagues Ryan Chick and Jenny Nelson assisted in the identification of Mt Terrible as a suitable study site. Technical assistance in the field and workshop was kindly provided by Ryan Chick, who was instrumental in giving radio-tracking instruction and assistance, and Mike Lindeman (ARI), Rena Gaborov (Wildlife Unlimited), Fiona Freestone and Joe Henderson (volunteers). Nigel Brennan (DSE Woori Yallock) assisted with our understanding of the strategic fuelbreaks project and Emily Borton (DSE Alexandra) provided advice on track conditions. Maps were produced using the DSE Biodiversity Interactive Mapping system. Richard Loyn, Dan Harley, Rodney van der Ree, Lee Harrison and Joanne Ainley provided helpful input into project design and methods. Field work was carried out under Wildlife Research Permit number 10005394 and approval number 10/04 from the Arthur Rylah Institute Animal Ethics Committee. Helpful comments on a draft of this report were provided by Stephen Platt, Richard Loyn, Jenny Nelson and Alan Robley. vii viii Investigation of the barrier effects of a strategic fuelbreak on a population of the Smoky Mouse at Mt Terrible, Victoria Summary Following a series of large bushfires in central Victoria, the Victorian Government initiated the construction of strategic fuelbreaks around Melbourne’s water catchments in 2007. Approval for construction under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act (1999) (EPBC Act) was obtained with the proviso that the completed fuelbreaks be subject to formal assessment of potential impacts on threatened
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Calaby References
    Abbott, I.J. (1974). Natural history of Curtis Island, Bass Strait. 5. Birds, with some notes on mammal trapping. Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania 107: 171–74. General; Rodents; Abbott, I. (1978). Seabird islands No. 56 Michaelmas Island, King George Sound, Western Australia. Corella 2: 26–27. (Records rabbit and Rattus fuscipes). General; Rodents; Lagomorphs; Abbott, I. (1981). Seabird Islands No. 106 Mondrain Island, Archipelago of the Recherche, Western Australia. Corella 5: 60–61. (Records bush-rat and rock-wallaby). General; Rodents; Abbott, I. and Watson, J.R. (1978). The soils, flora, vegetation and vertebrate fauna of Chatham Island, Western Australia. Journal of the Royal Society of Western Australia 60: 65–70. (Only mammal is Rattus fuscipes). General; Rodents; Adams, D.B. (1980). Motivational systems of agonistic behaviour in muroid rodents: a comparative review and neural model. Aggressive Behavior 6: 295–346. Rodents; Ahern, L.D., Brown, P.R., Robertson, P. and Seebeck, J.H. (1985). Application of a taxon priority system to some Victorian vertebrate fauna. Fisheries and Wildlife Service, Victoria, Arthur Rylah Institute of Environmental Research Technical Report No. 32: 1–48. General; Marsupials; Bats; Rodents; Whales; Land Carnivores; Aitken, P. (1968). Observations on Notomys fuscus (Wood Jones) (Muridae-Pseudomyinae) with notes on a new synonym. South Australian Naturalist 43: 37–45. Rodents; Aitken, P.F. (1969). The mammals of the Flinders Ranges. Pp. 255–356 in Corbett, D.W.P. (ed.) The natural history of the Flinders Ranges. Libraries Board of South Australia : Adelaide. (Gives descriptions and notes on the echidna, marsupials, murids, and bats recorded for the Flinders Ranges; also deals with the introduced mammals, including the dingo).
    [Show full text]
  • Pseudomys Fumeus
    National Recovery Plan for the Smoky Mouse Pseudomys fumeus Peter Menkhorst and Linda Broome Prepared by Peter Menkhorst (Department of Sustainability and Environment, Victoria) and Linda Broome (Department of Environment and Climate Change, New South Wales) © State of Victoria Department of Sustainability and Environment 2006 This publication is copyright. No part may be reproduced by any process except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. Authorised by the Victorian Government, 8 Nicholson Street, East Melbourne. ISBN 978-1-74208-712-2 This is a Recovery Plan prepared under the Commonwealth Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999, with the assistance of funding provided by the Australian Government. This Recovery Plan has been developed with the involvement and cooperation of a range of stakeholders, but individual stakeholders have not necessarily committed to undertaking specific actions. The attainment of objectives and the provision of funds may be subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved. Proposed actions may be subject to modification over the life of the plan due to changes in knowledge. Disclaimer This publication may be of assistance to you but the State of Victoria and its employees do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence that may arise from you relying on any information in this publication. Published by the Victorian Government Department of Sustainability and Environment (DSE) Melbourne, 2008 An electronic version of this document is available on the Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts website www.environment.gov.au and on the NSW website www.threatenedspecies.environment.nsw.gov.au.
    [Show full text]
  • Rodents Bibliography
    Calaby’s Rodent Literature Abbott, I.J. (1974). Natural history of Curtis Island, Bass Strait. 5. Birds, with some notes on mammal trapping. Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania 107: 171–74. General; Rodents Abbott, I. (1978). Seabird islands No. 56 Michaelmas Island, King George Sound, Western Australia. Corella 2: 26–27. (Records rabbit and Rattus fuscipes). General; Rodents; Lagomorphs Abbott, I. (1981). Seabird Islands No. 106 Mondrain Island, Archipelago of the Recherche, Western Australia. Corella 5: 60–61. (Records bush-rat and rock-wallaby). General; Rodents Abbott, I. and Watson, J.R. (1978). The soils, flora, vegetation and vertebrate fauna of Chatham Island, Western Australia. Journal of the Royal Society of Western Australia 60: 65–70. (Only mammal is Rattus fuscipes). General; Rodents Adams, D.B. (1980). Motivational systems of agonistic behaviour in muroid rodents: a comparative review and neural model. Aggressive Behavior 6: 295–346. Rodents Ahern, L.D., Brown, P.R., Robertson, P. and Seebeck, J.H. (1985). Application of a taxon priority system to some Victorian vertebrate fauna. Fisheries and Wildlife Service, Victoria, Arthur Rylah Institute of Environmental Research Technical Report No. 32: 1–48. General; Marsupials; Bats; Rodents; Whales; Land Carnivores Aitken, P. (1968). Observations on Notomys fuscus (Wood Jones) (Muridae-Pseudomyinae) with notes on a new synonym. South Australian Naturalist 43: 37–45. Rodents; Aitken, P.F. (1969). The mammals of the Flinders Ranges. Pp. 255–356 in Corbett, D.W.P. (ed.) The natural history of the Flinders Ranges. Libraries Board of South Australia : Adelaide. (Gives descriptions and notes on the echidna, marsupials, murids, and bats recorded for the Flinders Ranges; also deals with the introduced mammals, including the dingo).
    [Show full text]
  • Island Rule and Bone Metabolism in Fossil Murines from Timor
    Island rule and bone metabolism in fossil murines from Timor Miszkiewicz, JJ, Louys, J, Beck, RMD, Mahoney, P, Aplin, K and O’Connor, S http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biolinnean/blz197 Title Island rule and bone metabolism in fossil murines from Timor Authors Miszkiewicz, JJ, Louys, J, Beck, RMD, Mahoney, P, Aplin, K and O’Connor, S Type Article URL This version is available at: http://usir.salford.ac.uk/id/eprint/56252/ Published Date 2020 USIR is a digital collection of the research output of the University of Salford. Where copyright permits, full text material held in the repository is made freely available online and can be read, downloaded and copied for non-commercial private study or research purposes. Please check the manuscript for any further copyright restrictions. For more information, including our policy and submission procedure, please contact the Repository Team at: [email protected]. Page 1 of 47 Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 1 2 3 Island rule and bone metabolism in fossil murines from Timor 4 5 6 7 1* 2 3 4 ** 8 Justyna J. Miszkiewicz , Julien Louys , Robin M. D. Beck , Patrick Mahoney , Ken Aplin , 9 Sue O’Connor5,6 10 11 12 13 1School of Archaeology and Anthropology, College of Arts and Social Sciences, Australian 14 National University, 0200 Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia 15 16 17 2Australian Research Centre for Human Evolution, Environmental Futures Research Institute, 18 Griffith University, 4111 Brisbane, Queensland, Australia 19 20 21 3School of Environment Forand Life PeerSciences,
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology and Conservation Status of the Brush-Tailed Rabbit-Rat Conilurus Penicillatus
    Ecology and conservation status of the brush-tailed rabbit-rat Conilurus penicillatus Ronald Stuart Craig Firth B. Sc. (Hons) (Monash) Faculty of Education, Health and Science Charles Darwin University A thesis submitted to satisfy the requirements of a degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Science) ii Declaration I hereby declare that the work herein, submitted as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Science) at Charles Darwin University is the result of my own investigations, and all references to ideas and work of other researchers have been specifically acknowledged. I hereby certify that the work embodied in this thesis has not already been accepted in substance for any degree, and is not being currently submitted in candidature for any other degree. Ronald Stuart Craig Firth / / iii Acknowledgements Firstly I would like to thank my supervisors John Woinarski and Richard Noske, in particular John Woinarski for envisaging the project but first and foremost for his outstanding intellectual input for which I could not have done without and of course for also editing many drafts; Richard Noske for his help with all the administrative goings on associated with a PhD, for editing drafts and the occasional tasty cake. Charles Darwin University provided me with a scholarship and some project funding. Additional funding to conduct the research was also provided by the CRC for Tropical Savannas Management, the Biodiversity Conservation Division, Department of Natural Resources Environment and the Arts and Australian Geographic. Many
    [Show full text]
  • An Overdue Break up of the Rodent Genus Pseudomys Into Subgenera As Well As the Formal Naming of Four New Species
    30 Australasian Journal of Herpetology Australasian Journal of Herpetology 49:30-41. Published 6 August 2020. ISSN 1836-5698 (Print) ISSN 1836-5779 (Online) An overdue break up of the rodent genus Pseudomys into subgenera as well as the formal naming of four new species. LSIDURN:LSID:ZOOBANK.ORG:PUB:627AB9F7-5AD1-4A44-8BBE-E245C4A3A441 RAYMOND T. HOSER LSIDurn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:F9D74EB5-CFB5-49A0-8C7C-9F993B8504AE 488 Park Road, Park Orchards, Victoria, 3134, Australia. Phone: +61 3 9812 3322 Fax: 9812 3355 E-mail: snakeman (at) snakeman.com.au Received 1 May 2020, Accepted 8 July 2020, Published 6 August 2020. ABSTRACT An audit of all previously named species and synonyms within the putative genus of Australian mice Pseudomys (including genera phylogenetically included within Pseudomys in recent studies) found a number of distinctive and divergent species groups. Some of these groups have been treated by past authors as separate genera (e.g. Notomys Lesson, 1842) and others as subgenera (e.g. Thetomys Thomas, 1910). Other groups have been recognized (e.g. as done by Ford 2006), but remain unnamed. This paper assessed the current genus-level classification of all species and assigned them to species groups. Due to the relatively recent radiation and divergence of most species groups being around the five million year mark (Smissen 2017), the appropriate level of division was found to be subgenera. As a result, eleven subgenera are recognized, with five formally named for the first time in accordance with the rules of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (Ride et al. 1999).
    [Show full text]
  • Smoky Mouse Pseudomys Fumeus
    Action Statement FloraFlora and and Fauna Fauna Guarantee Guarantee Act Act 1988 1988 No. No. ### 196 Smoky Mouse Pseudomys fumeus Description and distribution The Smoky Mouse Pseudomys fumeus is a small native rodent about 2-3 times the size of the introduced House Mouse. Its fur is pale smoky grey above and whitish below. The tail is long, narrow, flexible and sparsely furred. The tail colour is pale pinkish grey with a narrow dark stripe along its upper surface. The ears and feet are flesh-coloured with sparse white hair. Total length varies from 180 mm to 250 mm with the tail accounting for more than half of this. The ears are 18-22 mm long and the hind feet 25-29 mm. Adult weight varies widely, from 25 g to 86 g. Animals from The Grampians and Otway Range in western Victoria tend to be larger and darker than Smoky Mouse (Pseudomys fumeus) those from east of Melbourne (Menkhorst and (Photo: DSE/McCann) Knight 2001, Menkhorst and Seebeck unpublished data). Victorian records of the Smoky Mouse fall into five distinct Victorian biogeographic regions: Greater Grampians, Otway Ranges, Highlands (both northern and southern falls), Victorian Alps and East Gippsland Lowlands. It is not certain that the species persists in all of these regions, as recent targeted surveys have failed to detect it in the East Gippsland Lowlands and the Otway Ranges (Menkhorst and Homan unpublished). Habitat The precise habitat requirements of the Smoky Mouse are far from clear. A wide range of vegetation communities are occupied, from damp coastal heath to sub-alpine heath.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Cite Complete Issue More Information About This Article
    Therya ISSN: 2007-3364 Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste Woinarski, John C. Z.; Burbidge, Andrew A.; Harrison, Peter L. A review of the conservation status of Australian mammals Therya, vol. 6, no. 1, January-April, 2015, pp. 155-166 Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste DOI: 10.12933/therya-15-237 Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=402336276010 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System Redalyc More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America and the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Project academic non-profit, developed under the open access initiative THERYA, 2015, Vol. 6 (1): 155-166 DOI: 10.12933/therya-15-237, ISSN 2007-3364 Una revisión del estado de conservación de los mamíferos australianos A review of the conservation status of Australian mammals John C. Z. Woinarski1*, Andrew A. Burbidge2, and Peter L. Harrison3 1National Environmental Research Program North Australia and Threatened Species Recovery Hub of the National Environmental Science Programme, Charles Darwin University, NT 0909. Australia. E-mail: [email protected] (JCZW) 2Western Australian Wildlife Research Centre, Department of Parks and Wildlife, PO Box 51, Wanneroo, WA 6946, Australia. E-mail: [email protected] (AAB) 3Marine Ecology Research Centre, School of Environment, Science and Engineering, Southern Cross University, PO Box 157, Lismore, NSW 2480, Australia. E-mail: [email protected] (PLH) *Corresponding author Introduction: This paper provides a summary of results from a recent comprehensive review of the conservation status of all Australian land and marine mammal species and subspecies.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Methods S1
    1 Validation methods for trophic niche models 2 3 To assign links between nodes (species), we used trophic niche-space models (e.g., [1]). 4 Each of these models has two quantile regressions that define the prey-size range a 5 predator of a given size is predicted to consume. Species whose body mass is within the 6 range of a predator’s prey size, as identified by the trophic niche-space model, are predicted 7 to be prey, while those outside the range are predicted not to be eaten. 8 9 The broad taxonomy of a predator helps to predict predation interactions [2]. To optimize 10 our trophic niche-space model, we therefore tested whether including taxonomic class of 11 predators improved the fit of quantile regressions. Using trophic (to identify which species 12 were predators), body mass, and taxonomic data, we fitted and compared five quantile 13 regression models (including a null model) to the GloBI data. In each model, we log10- 14 transformed the dependent variable prey body mass, and included for the independent 15 variables different combinations of log10-transformed predator body mass, predator class, 16 and the interaction between these variables (Supplementary Table S4). We log10- 17 transformed both predator and prey body mass to linearize the relationship between these 18 variables. We fit the five quantile regressions to the upper and lower 5% of prey body mass, 19 and compared model fits using the Bayesian information criterion (BIC). The predator body 20 mass*predator class model fit the 95th quantile data best, whereas the predator body mass 21 + predator class model fit the 5th quantile data marginally better than the aforementioned 22 interaction model (Supplementary Figure S2, Supplementary Table S4).
    [Show full text]
  • The Smoky Mouse
    ACTION PLAN No. 23 Second Edition The Smoky Mouse Pseudomys fumeus was declared an endangered species on 6 January 1998 (Determination DI1998-7, DI1998-192) in accordance with section 38 of the Nature Conservation Act 1980. Section 40 of the Act requires the Conservator of Flora and Fauna to prepare an Action Plan in response to each declaration. This is the Action Plan for the: Smoky Mouse Pseudomys fumeus Preamble The status of the Smoky Mouse in the ACT remains unchanged since the first edition of this Action Plan. The species is known from The Nature Conservation Act 1980 establishes the ACT from two capture records and a the ACT Flora and Fauna Committee with probable hair sample, all obtained prior to responsibilities for assessing the conservation 1994. Subsequent surveys have not detected status of ACT flora and fauna and the the species and its continued presence in the ecological significance of potentially ACT is uncertain. threatening processes. Where the Committee believes that a species or ecological community is threatened with extinction or a process is an ecological threat, it is required to Table 1 Criteria satisfied advise the responsible Minister and 1.2 Species is observed, estimated, inferred recommend that a declaration be made or suspected to be at risk of premature accordingly. extinction in the ACT region in the near future, as demonstrated by one or more Flora and Fauna Committee assessments are of: made on nature conservation grounds only and in a regional context. They are guided by 1.2.6 Extremely small population. criteria set out in its publication Threatened Species and Communities in the ACT: criteria for assessment, July 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey Guidelines for Australia's Threatened Mammals
    Survey guidelines for Australia’s threatened mammals Guidelines for detecting mammals listed as threatened under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 Acknowledgements This report updates and expands on a draft report prepared in June 2004 by Cate McElroy. Sandy Ingleby and Jayne Tipping directed, proof-read and helped to write the 2004 report. Joanne Stokes and Shaun Barclay provided technical assistance in the preparation of the 2004 report. The 2004 report was reviewed by Martin Schulz and Robert Close and the individual species profiles were reviewed by Martin Schulz (small and arboreal mammals), Robert Close (medium-sized mammals and rock wallabies), Chris Belcher (quolls and wombats) and Sandy Ingleby (bridled nailtail and spectacled hare wallaby). Additional species profiles were prepared for the updated (2010) report by Martin Schulz and reviewed by Robert Close. Updates to the information contained in the 2004 report were prepared by Martin Schulz, Lisa McCaffrey, Mark Semeniuk, Dejan Stejanovic, Rachel Blakey and Glenn Muir. Glenn Muir co-ordinated the project team and reviewed the final report. In preparing these standards, a large number of experts have provided a wealth of experience, and in some cases unpublished results, so that all listed non-flying mammal species could be adequately considered. These include, in particular, Barbara Triggs for providing a list of EPBC Act listed species that can be distinguished from hair samples, Joe Benshemesh (NT DIPE, Alice Springs) for the marsupial mole species, Jody Gates (SA DEH, Kangaroo Island) for the Kangaroo Island dunnart, David Paull (UNE) for the Pilliga mouse, Chris Dickman (University of Sydney) for the mulgara and the ampurta, Peter Canty (SA DEH) for the kowari, Tony Friend (WA DEC, Albany) for the numbat, Peter Banks (UNSW) for an unpublished manuscript relating to the quokka, Shaun Barclay (UNSW) for the greater stick-nest rat, Jenny Nelson (Vic.
    [Show full text]
  • NATIVE MICE and RATS BILL BREED and FRED FORD NATIVE MICE and RATS Photos Courtesy Jiri Lochman,Transparencies Lochman
    AUSTRALIAN NATURAL HISTORY SERIES AUSTRALIAN NATURAL HISTORY SERIES NATIVE MICE AND RATS BILL BREED AND FRED FORD BILL BREED AND RATS MICE NATIVE NATIVE MICE AND RATS Photos courtesy Jiri Lochman,Transparencies Lochman Australia’s native rodents are the most ecologically diverse family of Australian mammals. There are about 60 living species – all within the subfamily Murinae – representing around 25 per cent of all species of Australian mammals.They range in size from the very small delicate mouse to the highly specialised, arid-adapted hopping mouse, the large tree rat and the carnivorous water rat. Native Mice and Rats describes the evolution and ecology of this much-neglected group of animals. It details the diversity of their reproductive biology, their dietary adaptations and social behaviour. The book also includes information on rodent parasites and diseases, and concludes by outlining the changes in distribution of the various species since the arrival of Europeans as well as current conservation programs. Bill Breed is an Associate Professor at The University of Adelaide. He has focused his research on the reproductive biology of Australian native mammals, in particular native rodents and dasyurid marsupials. Recently he has extended his studies to include rodents of Asia and Africa. Fred Ford has trapped and studied native rats and mice across much of northern Australia and south-eastern New South Wales. He currently works for the CSIRO Australian National Wildlife Collection. BILL BREED AND FRED FORD NATIVE MICE AND RATS Native Mice 4thpp.indd i 15/11/07 2:22:35 PM Native Mice 4thpp.indd ii 15/11/07 2:22:36 PM AUSTRALIAN NATURAL HISTORY SERIES NATIVE MICE AND RATS BILL BREED AND FRED FORD Native Mice 4thpp.indd iii 15/11/07 2:22:37 PM © Bill Breed and Fred Ford 2007 All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]