DOCSLIB.ORG

Secular Chaos and Its Application to Mercury, Hot Jupiters, And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Secular Chaos and Its Application to Mercury, Hot Jupiters, And Secular chaos and its application to Mercury, hot SPECIAL FEATURE Jupiters, and the organization of planetary systems Yoram Lithwicka,b,1 and Yanqin Wuc aDepartment of Physics and Astronomy and bCenter for Interdisciplinary Exploration and Research in Astrophysics, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208; and cDepartment of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada M5S 3H4 Edited by Adam S. Burrows, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, and accepted by the Editorial Board October 31, 2013 (received for review May 2, 2013) In the inner solar system, the planets’ orbits evolve chaotically, by including the most important MMRs (11).] It is the cause, for driven primarily by secular chaos. Mercury has a particularly cha- example, of Earth’s eccentricity-driven Milankovitch cycle. How- otic orbit and is in danger of being lost within a few billion years. ever, on timescales ≳107 years, the evolution is chaotic (e.g., Fig. Just as secular chaos is reorganizing the solar system today, so it 1), in sharp contrast to the prediction of linear secular theory. has likely helped organize it in the past. We suggest that extra- That appears to be puzzling, given the small eccentricities and solar planetary systems are also organized to a large extent by inclinations in the solar system. secular chaos. A hot Jupiter could be the end state of a secularly However, despite its importance, there has been little theo- chaotic planetary system reminiscent of the solar system. How- retical understanding of how secular chaos works. Conversely, ever, in the case of the hot Jupiter, the innermost planet was chaos driven by MMRs is much better understood. For example, Jupiter (rather than Mercury) sized, and its chaotic evolution was chaos due to MMR overlap explains the Kirkwood gaps in the terminated when it was tidally captured by its star. In this contri- asteroid belt (12), and chaos due to the overlap of three-body bution, we review our recent work elucidating the physics of sec- MMRs accounts for the very weak chaos in the outer solar sys- ular chaos and applying it to Mercury and to hot Jupiters. We also tem (8). Because chaos in the solar system is typically driven by present results comparing the inclinations of hot Jupiters thus pro- overlapping resonances [e.g., see review (13)], one might reason duced with observations. that the secular chaos of the inner solar system is driven by overlapping “secular resonances.” Laskar (14, 15) and Sussman ASTRONOMY planetary dynamics | extrasolar planets and Wisdom (16) identified a number of candidate secular res- onances that might drive chaos in the inner solar system by ex- he question of the stability of the solar system has a long and amining angle combinations that alternately librated and circulated Tillustrious history (e.g., ref. 1). It was finally answered with in their simulations. However, there are an infinite number of such the aid of computer simulations (2–4), which have shown that the angle combinations, and it is not clear which are dynamically im- solar system is “marginally stable”: it is chaotically unstable, but portant—or why (13, 16). on a timescale comparable to its age. In the inner solar system, In ref. 17, we developed the theory for secular chaos, and the planets’ eccentricities (e) and inclinations (i) diffuse in bil- applied it to Mercury, the solar system’s most unstable planet. lions of years, with the two lightest planets, Mercury (Fig. 1) and We demonstrated how the locations and widths of general sec- Mars, experiencing particularly large variations. Mercury may ular resonances can be calculated, and how the overlap of the even be lost from the solar system on a billion-year timescale (5– relevant resonances quantitatively explains Mercury’s chaotic 7). [Chaos is much weaker in the outer solar system than in the orbit. This theory, which we review below, shows why Mercury’s inner (8–10).] However, despite the spectacular success in solv- motion is nonlinear—and chaotic—even though e’s and i’s re- ing solar system stability, fundamental questions remain: What main modest. It also shows that Mercury lies just above the is the theoretical explanation for orbital chaos of the solar sys- threshold for chaotic diffusion. tem? What does the chaotic nature of the solar system teach us A system of just two secularly interacting planets can be cha- about its history and organization? Also, how does this relate to otic if their eccentricities and inclinations are both of order unity extrasolar systems? (18–20). In systems with three or more planets, however, there is For well-spaced planets that are not close to strong mean- a less stringent criterion on the minimum eccentricity and inclination motion resonances (MMRs), the orbits evolve on timescales much longer than orbital periods. Hence one may often simplify Significance the problem by orbit-averaging the interplanetary interactions. “ ” The averaged equations are known as the secular equations Planets perturb one another as they orbit their star. These (e.g., ref. 11). To linear order in masses, secular evolution con- perturbations can build up over a long time, leading to in- sists of interactions between rings, which represent the planets stability and chaos, and, ultimately, to dramatic events such as after their masses have been smeared out over an orbit. Secular interplanetary collisions. We focus here on “secular chaos,” evolution dominates the evolution of the terrestrial planets in the which is the chaos that arises in the orbit-averaged equations. solar system (5), and it is natural to suppose that it dominates in We explain how secular chaos works and show that it explains many extrasolar systems as well. This is the type of planetary the chaos of Mercury’s orbit. We also show that secular chaos interaction we focus on in this contribution. could be responsible for the formation of “hot Jupiters,” which One might be tempted by the small eccentricities and incli- are Jupiter-mass planets that orbit very close to their star. Fi- nations in the solar system to simplify further and linearize the nally, we suggest that secular chaos might be important not secular equations, i.e., consider only terms to leading order in only for Mercury and hot Jupiters, but also more generally for eccentricity and inclination. Linear secular theory reduces to organizing a wide variety of extrasolar planetary systems. a simple eigenvalue problem. For N secularly interacting planets, the solution consists of 2N eigenmodes: N for the eccentricity Author contributions: Y.L. and Y.W. wrote the paper. degrees of freedom and another N for the inclination. Each of The authors declare no conflict of interest. the eigenmodes evolves independently of the others (11). Linear This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. A.S.B. is a guest editor invited by the Ed- secular theory provides a satisfactory description of the planets’ itorial Board. orbits on million-year timescales. [Higher accuracy can be achieved 1To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected]. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1308261110 PNAS Early Edition | 1of6 Downloaded by guest on September 30, 2021 1=2 conjugate pair [e.g., the Poincaré variables Γ ≈ mðGMpaÞ e2=2 and γ = − ϖ] and employs the usual Hamilton’s equations for Γ and γ. The same is true for the outer planet. One finds, after writing the resulting equations in terms of complex eccentricities (z ≡ eeiϖ and z′ ≡ e′eiϖ′), pffiffiffiffi pffiffiffiffi ′ d z 2f2n μ′ a′ −βμ′ a′ z 20 = i pffiffiffi pffiffiffi pffiffiffi ; [2] dt z′ a −βμ a μ a z′ 10 qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi 3 where n′ = GMp=a′ , μ = m=Mp,andβ = −f10=ð2f2Þ (for example, 0 β ≈ 5α=4 for small α). The solution to this linear set of equations is a sum of two eigenmodes, each of which has a constant am- plitude and a longitude that precesses uniformly in time. The Fig. 1. Mercury’s chaos in an N-body integration of the solar system. Black theory may be trivially extended to N planets, leading to N eigenm- shows Mercury’s total eccentricity and inclination. Green shows free e and i, odes. It may also be extended to linear order in inclinations, which iΩ which were obtained by filtering out the forcing frequencies of the other leads to a second set of N eigenmodes. The equations for ζ = ie planets in Fourier space. The wander of the green curves demonstrates that are identical to those for z,butwithβ → 1. Mercury’s orbit is chaotic. Adapted from ref. 17. Overlap of Secular Resonances Drives Secular Chaos. The linear equations admit the possibility for a secular resonance, which required for chaos, and the character of secular chaos is more occurs when two eigenfrequencies match. Consider a massless diffusive. This diffusive type of secular chaos promotes equi- particle perturbed by a precessing mode. In anticipation of ap- partition between different secular degrees of freedom. During plication to the solar system, one may think of the test particle as secular chaos, the angular momentum of each planet varies Mercury, and the mode as the one dominated by Jupiter. Eq. 2 chaotically, with the innermost planet being slightly more sus- implies that the particle’s z is governed by the following: ceptible to large variations (21). If enough angular momentum is removed from that planet, its pericenter will approach the star. dz À Á igmt In addition, if that planet resembles Jupiter, tidal interaction = iγ z − eme ; [3] dt with its host star may then remove its orbital energy, turning it into a hot Jupiter. Hot Saturns or hot Neptunes may also be where γ is the particle’s free precession rate, gm is the mode’s produced similarly.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Constructing the Secular Architecture of the Solar System I: the Giant Planets
    Astronomy & Astrophysics manuscript no. secular c ESO 2018 May 29, 2018 Constructing the secular architecture of the solar system I: The giant planets A. Morbidelli1, R. Brasser1, K. Tsiganis2, R. Gomes3, and H. F. Levison4 1 Dep. Cassiopee, University of Nice - Sophia Antipolis, CNRS, Observatoire de la Cˆote d’Azur; Nice, France 2 Department of Physics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki; Thessaloniki, Greece 3 Observat´orio Nacional; Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil 4 Southwest Research Institute; Boulder, CO, USA submitted: 13 July 2009; accepted: 31 August 2009 ABSTRACT Using numerical simulations, we show that smooth migration of the giant planets through a planetesimal disk leads to an orbital architecture that is inconsistent with the current one: the resulting eccentricities and inclinations of their orbits are too small. The crossing of mutual mean motion resonances by the planets would excite their orbital eccentricities but not their orbital inclinations. Moreover, the amplitudes of the eigenmodes characterising the current secular evolution of the eccentricities of Jupiter and Saturn would not be reproduced correctly; only one eigenmode is excited by resonance-crossing. We show that, at the very least, encounters between Saturn and one of the ice giants (Uranus or Neptune) need to have occurred, in order to reproduce the current secular properties of the giant planets, in particular the amplitude of the two strongest eigenmodes in the eccentricities of Jupiter and Saturn. Key words. Solar System: formation 1. Introduction Snellgrove (2001). The top panel shows the evolution of the semi major axes, where Saturn’ semi-major axis is depicted The formation and evolution of the solar system is a longstand- by the upper curve and that of Jupiter is the lower trajectory.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Trajectory Design for the Transiting Exoplanet
    TRAJECTORY DESIGN FOR THE TRANSITING EXOPLANET SURVEY SATELLITE Donald J. Dichmann(1), Joel J.K. Parker(2), Trevor W. Williams(3), Chad R. Mendelsohn(4) (1,2,3,4)Code 595.0, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, 8800 Greenbelt Road, Greenbelt MD 20771. 301-286-6621. [email protected] Abstract: The Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS) is a National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) mission, scheduled to be launched in 2017. TESS will travel in a highly eccentric orbit around Earth, with initial perigee radius near 17 Earth radii (Re) and apogee radius near 59 Re. The orbit period is near 2:1 resonance with the Moon, with apogee nearly 90 degrees out-of-phase with the Moon, in a configuration that has been shown to be operationally stable. TESS will execute phasing loops followed by a lunar flyby, with a final maneuver to achieve 2:1 resonance with the Moon. The goals of a resonant orbit with long-term stability, short eclipses and limited oscillations of perigee present significant challenges to the trajectory design. To rapidly assess launch opportunities, we adapted the Schematics Window Methodology (SWM76) launch window analysis tool to assess the TESS mission constraints. To understand the long-term dynamics of such a resonant orbit in the Earth-Moon system we employed Dynamical Systems Theory in the Circular Restricted 3-Body Problem (CR3BP). For precise trajectory analysis we use a high-fidelity model and multiple shooting in the General Mission Analysis Tool (GMAT) to optimize the maneuver delta-V and meet mission constraints. Finally we describe how the techniques we have developed can be applied to missions with similar requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • Secular Chaos and Its Application to Mercury, Hot Jupiters, and The
    Secular chaos and its application to Mercury, hot SPECIAL FEATURE Jupiters, and the organization of planetary systems Yoram Lithwicka,b,1 and Yanqin Wuc aDepartment of Physics and Astronomy and bCenter for Interdisciplinary Exploration and Research in Astrophysics, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208; and cDepartment of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada M5S 3H4 Edited by Adam S. Burrows, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, and accepted by the Editorial Board October 31, 2013 (received for review May 2, 2013) In the inner solar system, the planets’ orbits evolve chaotically, by including the most important MMRs (11).] It is the cause, for driven primarily by secular chaos. Mercury has a particularly cha- example, of Earth’s eccentricity-driven Milankovitch cycle. How- otic orbit and is in danger of being lost within a few billion years. ever, on timescales ≳107 years, the evolution is chaotic (e.g., Fig. Just as secular chaos is reorganizing the solar system today, so it 1), in sharp contrast to the prediction of linear secular theory. has likely helped organize it in the past. We suggest that extra- That appears to be puzzling, given the small eccentricities and solar planetary systems are also organized to a large extent by inclinations in the solar system. secular chaos. A hot Jupiter could be the end state of a secularly However, despite its importance, there has been little theo- chaotic planetary system reminiscent of the solar system. How- retical understanding of how secular chaos works. Conversely, ever, in the case of the hot Jupiter, the innermost planet was chaos driven by MMRs is much better understood.
    [Show full text]
  • Estabilidade De Veículos Espaciais Em Ressonância
    sid.inpe.br/mtc-m21c/2018/03.12.13.05-TDI ESTABILIDADE DE VEÍCULOS ESPACIAIS EM RESSONÂNCIA Rubens Antonio Condeles Júnior Tese de Doutorado do Curso de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia e Tecnologia Espaciais/Mecânica Espacial e Controle, orientada pelos Drs. Antonio Fernando Bertachini de Almeida Prado, e Tadashi Yokoyama, aprovada em 06 de abril de 2018. URL do documento original: <http://urlib.net/8JMKD3MGP3W34R/3QMPS3E> INPE São José dos Campos 2018 PUBLICADO POR: Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais - INPE Gabinete do Diretor (GBDIR) Serviço de Informação e Documentação (SESID) Caixa Postal 515 - CEP 12.245-970 São José dos Campos - SP - Brasil Tel.:(012) 3208-6923/6921 E-mail: [email protected] COMISSÃO DO CONSELHO DE EDITORAÇÃO E PRESERVAÇÃO DA PRODUÇÃO INTELECTUAL DO INPE (DE/DIR-544): Presidente: Maria do Carmo de Andrade Nono - Conselho de Pós-Graduação (CPG) Membros: Dr. Plínio Carlos Alvalá - Centro de Ciência do Sistema Terrestre (COCST) Dr. André de Castro Milone - Coordenação-Geral de Ciências Espaciais e Atmosféricas (CGCEA) Dra. Carina de Barros Melo - Coordenação de Laboratórios Associados (COCTE) Dr. Evandro Marconi Rocco - Coordenação-Geral de Engenharia e Tecnologia Espacial (CGETE) Dr. Hermann Johann Heinrich Kux - Coordenação-Geral de Observação da Terra (CGOBT) Dr. Marley Cavalcante de Lima Moscati - Centro de Previsão de Tempo e Estudos Climáticos (CGCPT) Silvia Castro Marcelino - Serviço de Informação e Documentação (SESID) BIBLIOTECA DIGITAL: Dr. Gerald Jean Francis Banon Clayton Martins Pereira - Serviço de Informação
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Resonant Kuiper Belt Objects
    Resonant Kuiper Belt Objects - a Review Renu Malhotra Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA Email: [email protected] Abstract Our understanding of the history of the solar system has undergone a revolution in recent years, owing to new theoretical insights into the origin of Pluto and the discovery of the Kuiper belt and its rich dynamical structure. The emerging picture of dramatic orbital migration of the planets driven by interaction with the primordial Kuiper belt is thought to have produced the final solar system architecture that we live in today. This paper gives a brief summary of this new view of our solar system's history, and reviews the astronomical evidence in the resonant populations of the Kuiper belt. Introduction Lying at the edge of the visible solar system, observational confirmation of the existence of the Kuiper belt came approximately a quarter-century ago with the discovery of the distant minor planet (15760) Albion (formerly 1992 QB1, Jewitt & Luu 1993). With the clarity of hindsight, we now recognize that Pluto was the first discovered member of the Kuiper belt. The current census of the Kuiper belt includes more than 2000 minor planets at heliocentric distances between ~30 au and ~50 au. Their orbital distribution reveals a rich dynamical structure shaped by the gravitational perturbations of the giant planets, particularly Neptune. Theoretical analysis of these structures has revealed a remarkable dynamic history of the solar system. The story is as follows (see Fernandez & Ip 1984, Malhotra 1993, Malhotra 1995, Fernandez & Ip 1996, and many subsequent works).
    [Show full text]
  • The Long-Term Dynamical Evolution of Planetary Systems
    The Long-Term Dynamical Evolution of Planetary Systems Melvyn B. Davies Lund University Fred C. Adams University of Michigan Philip Armitage University of Colorado, Boulder John Chambers Carnegie Institution of Washington Eric Ford The Pennsylvania State University, University of Florida Alessandro Morbidelli University of Nice Sean N. Raymond University of Bordeaux Dimitri Veras University of Cambridge This chapter concerns the long-term dynamical evolution of planetary systems from both theoretical and observational perspectives. We begin by discussing the planet-planet interactions that take place within our own Solar System. We then describe such interactions in more tightly-packed planetary systems. As planet-planet interactions build up, some systems become dynamically unstable, leading to strong encounters and ultimately either ejections or collisions of planets. After discussing the basic physical processes involved, we consider how these interactions apply to extrasolar planetary systems and explore the constraints provided by observed systems. The presence of a residual planetesimal disc can lead to planetary migration and hence cause instabilities induced by resonance crossing; however, such discs can also stabilise planetary systems. The crowded birth environment of a planetary system can have a significant impact: close encounters and binary companions can act to destabilise systems, or sculpt their properties. In the case of binaries, the Kozai mechanism can place planets on extremely eccentric orbits which may later circularise to produce hot Jupiters. 1. INTRODUCTION views the application of theoretical models to observations of the solar system and extrasolar planetary systems. Currently observed planetary systems have typically Planetary systems evolve due to the exchange of angu- evolved between the time when the last gas in the protoplan- lar momentum and / or energy among multiple planets, be- etary disc was dispersed, and today.
    [Show full text]
  • Orbital Resonances and Chaos in the Solar System
    Solar system Formation and Evolution ASP Conference Series, Vol. 149, 1998 D. Lazzaro et al., eds. ORBITAL RESONANCES AND CHAOS IN THE SOLAR SYSTEM Renu Malhotra Lunar and Planetary Institute 3600 Bay Area Blvd, Houston, TX 77058, USA E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. Long term solar system dynamics is a tale of orbital resonance phe- nomena. Orbital resonances can be the source of both instability and long term stability. This lecture provides an overview, with simple models that elucidate our understanding of orbital resonance phenomena. 1. INTRODUCTION The phenomenon of resonance is a familiar one to everybody from childhood. A very young child is delighted in a playground swing when an older companion drives the swing at its natural frequency and rapidly increases the swing amplitude; the older child accomplishes the same on her own without outside assistance by driving the swing at a frequency twice that of its natural frequency. Resonance phenomena in the Solar system are essentially similar – the driving of a dynamical system by a periodic force at a frequency which is a rational multiple of the natural frequency. In fact, there are many mathematical similarities with the playground analogy, including the fact of nonlinearity of the oscillations, which plays a fundamental role in the long term evolution of orbits in the planetary system. But there is also an important difference: in the playground, the child adjusts her driving frequency to remain in tune – hence in resonance – with the natural frequency which changes with the amplitude of the swing. Such self-tuning is sometimes realized in the Solar system; but it is more often and more generally the case that resonances come-and-go.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1308.3674V2 [Astro-Ph.HE]
    Draft version November 13, 2018 A Preprint typeset using LTEX style emulateapj v. 5/2/11 BLACK HOLE TRIPLE DYNAMICS: BREAKDOWN OF THE ORBIT AVERAGE APPROXIMATION AND IMPLICATIONS FOR GRAVITATIONAL WAVE DETECTIONS Fabio Antoninia, Norman Murraya & Seppo Mikkolab aCanadian Institute for Theoretical Astrophysics, University of Toronto, 60 George St., Toronto, Ontario M5S 3H8, Canada bTuorla Observatory, University of Turku, Vais¨ al¨ antie¨ 20, Piikkio¨ FI-21500, Finland E-mail: [email protected] Draft version November 13, 2018 Abstract Coalescing black hole (BH) binaries forming via dynamical interactions in the dense core of globu- lar clusters (GCs) are expected to be one the brightest and most numerous sources of gravitational wave (GW) radiation, detectable by the upcoming generation of ground based laser interferometers. Favorable conditions for merger are initiated by the Kozai resonance in which the gravitational in- teraction with a third distant object, typically another BH, induces quasi-periodic variations of the inner BH binary eccentricity. In this paper we perform high precision 3-body simulations of the long term evolution of hierarchical BH triples and investigate the conditions that lead to the merging of the BH binary and the way it might become an observable source of GW radiation. We find that the secular orbit average treatment, adopted in previous works, does not reliably describe the dynamics of these systems if the binary is orbited by the outer BH on a highly inclined orbit with a periapsis distance less than 10 times the inner binary semi-major axis. During the high eccentricity phase of a Kozai cycle the∼ torque due to the outer BH can drive the binary to extremely large eccentricities in a fraction of the binary’s orbital period.
    [Show full text]
  • Three-Body Capture of Irregular Satellites: Application to Jupiter
    Icarus 208 (2010) 824–836 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Icarus journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/icarus Three-body capture of irregular satellites: Application to Jupiter Catherine M. Philpott a,*, Douglas P. Hamilton a, Craig B. Agnor b a Department of Astronomy, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742-2421, USA b Astronomy Unit, School of Mathematical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London E14NS, UK article info abstract Article history: We investigate a new theory of the origin of the irregular satellites of the giant planets: capture of one Received 19 October 2009 member of a 100-km binary asteroid after tidal disruption. The energy loss from disruption is sufficient Revised 24 March 2010 for capture, but it cannot deliver the bodies directly to the observed orbits of the irregular satellites. Accepted 26 March 2010 Instead, the long-lived capture orbits subsequently evolve inward due to interactions with a tenuous cir- Available online 7 April 2010 cumplanetary gas disk. We focus on the capture by Jupiter, which, due to its large mass, provides a stringent test of our model. Keywords: We investigate the possible fates of disrupted bodies, the differences between prograde and retrograde Irregular satellites captures, and the effects of Callisto on captured objects. We make an impulse approximation and discuss Jupiter, Satellites Planetary dynamics how it allows us to generalize capture results from equal-mass binaries to binaries with arbitrary mass Satellites, Dynamics ratios. Jupiter We find that at Jupiter, binaries offer an increase of a factor of 10 in the capture rate of 100-km objects as compared to single bodies, for objects separated by tens of radii that approach the planet on relatively low-energy trajectories.
    [Show full text]
  • Basic Notations
    Appendix A Basic Notations In this Appendix, the basic notations for the mathematical operators and astronom- ical and physical quantities used throughout the book are given. Note that only the most frequently used quantities are mentioned; besides, overlapping symbol definitions and deviations from the basically adopted notations are possible, when appropriate. Mathematical Quantities and Operators kxk is the length (norm) of vector x x y is the scalar product of vectors x and y rr is the gradient operator in the direction of vector r f f ; gg is the Poisson bracket of functions f and g K.m/ or K.k/ (where m D k2) is the complete elliptic integral of the first kind with modulus k E.m/ or E.k/ is the complete elliptic integral of the second kind F.˛; m/ is the incomplete elliptic integral of the first kind E.˛; m/ is the incomplete elliptic integral of the second kind ƒ0 is Heuman’s Lambda function Pi is the Legendre polynomial of degree i x0 is the initial value of a variable x Coordinates and Frames x, y, z are the Cartesian (orthogonal) coordinates r, , ˛ are the spherical coordinates (radial distance, longitude, and latitude) © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017 171 I. I. Shevchenko, The Lidov-Kozai Effect – Applications in Exoplanet Research and Dynamical Astronomy, Astrophysics and Space Science Library 441, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-43522-0 172 A Basic Notations In the three-body problem: r1 is the position vector of body 1 relative to body 0 r2 is the position vector of body 2 relative to the center of mass of the inner
    [Show full text]
  • How Does the Lidov–Kozai Mechanism Protect Quadrantids Meteoroid Stream from Close Encounters with Jupiter?
    EPSC Abstracts Vol. 14, EPSC2020-551, 2020 https://doi.org/10.5194/epsc2020-551 Europlanet Science Congress 2020 © Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. How does the Lidov–Kozai mechanism protect Quadrantids meteoroid stream from close encounters with Jupiter? Georgy E. Sambarov1, Tatyana Yu. Galushina2, and Olga M. Syusina1,2 1Tomsk State University, Research Institute of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, Russian Federation ([email protected]) 2Tomsk State University, Russian Federation ([email protected]) The dynamical evolution of simulated meteoroid stream of the Quadrantids ejected from the parent body of the asteroid (196256) 2003 EH1 expects possible scenario for resonant motion. We found a peculiar behavior for this stream. Here, we show that the orbits of some ejected particles are strongly affected by the Lidov–Kozai mechanism that protects them from close encounters with Jupiter. Lack of close encounters with Jupiter leads to a rather smooth growth in the parameter MEGNO (Mean Exponential Growth factor of Nearby Orbits) and the behavior imply the stable motion of simulation particles of the Quadrantids meteoroid stream. A rather smooth path with nearly constant semi-major axis is obtained due to lack of close encounters with Jupiter. The coupled oscillation of the three orbital parameters, e, i, and ω, for stable ejected particles is observed. However, close encounters with Jupiter are not treated by the Kozai formalism and can transfer particles away from the Kozai trajectories for unstable ejected particles over time. Other ejected particles have chaotic motion from simulations of the orbit of meteoroids are not affected by the Lidov – Kozai mechanism.
    [Show full text]
  • The Long-Term Dynamical Evolution of Planetary Systems
    The Long-Term Dynamical Evolution of Planetary Systems Melvyn B. Davies Lund University Fred C. Adams University of Michigan Philip Armitage University of Colorado, Boulder John Chambers Carnegie Institution of Washington Eric Ford The Pennsylvania State University, University of Florida Alessandro Morbidelli University of Nice Sean N. Raymond University of Bordeaux Dimitri Veras University of Cambridge This chapter concerns the long-term dynamical evolution of planetary systems from both theoretical and observational perspectives. We begin by discussing the planet-planet interactions that take place within our own Solar System. We then describe such interactions in more tightly-packed planetary systems. As planet-planet interactions build up, some systems become dynamically unstable, leading to strong encounters and ultimately either ejections or collisions of planets. After discussing the basic physical processes involved, we consider how these interactions apply to extrasolar planetary systems and explore the constraints provided by observed systems. The presence of a residual planetesimal disc can lead to planetary migration and hence cause instabilities induced by resonance crossing; however, such discs can also stabilise planetary systems. The crowded birth environment of a planetary system can have a significant impact: close encounters and binary companions can act to destabilise systems, or sculpt their properties. In the case of binaries, the Kozai mechanism can place planets on extremely eccentric orbits which may later circularise to produce hot Jupiters. arXiv:1311.6816v1 [astro-ph.EP] 26 Nov 2013 1. INTRODUCTION views the application of theoretical models to observations of the solar system and extrasolar planetary systems. Currently observed planetary systems have typically Planetary systems evolve due to the exchange of angu- evolved between the time when the last gas in the protoplan- lar momentum and / or energy among multiple planets, be- etary disc was dispersed, and today.
    [Show full text]