It Can Happen Here a Case Against American Exceptionalism in U.S

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

It Can Happen Here a Case Against American Exceptionalism in U.S It Can Happen Here A Case against American Exceptionalism in U.S. Political Fiction Masterarbeit zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Master of Arts (MA) an der Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz vorgelegt von Julian LAMPLMAYR, BA am Institut für Amerikanistik Begutachter: Univ.-Prof. Dr. Stefan BRANDT, MA Graz, 2020 1 Acknowledgments I would like to thank: first and foremost, my girlfriend Alisa, for her unconditional love and support as well as her unshakable belief in me; my sister Laura, for her kind encouragements and useful tips on the process of writing a master’s thesis; my brother Alexander, for his interest in the topic and thought-provoking views on it; my parents, for their patience; my friends at university and the dormitory for their significant contribution to these formative years in both academic and personal terms, especially Heike and Alina as well as Martina and Gundi; and my supervisor, for his important feedback, drawn from his vast knowledge about American culture. 2 Table of Contents Introduction . 3 1. Sinclair Lewis’s Dystopian Novel It Can’t Happen Here: Speculative Historical Fiction about a Fascist/Totalitarian U.S.A. 8 1.1. Fascist Trends in U.S. History Challenging the Idea of American Exceptionalism . 8 1.2. Fascist Preconditions Shown as Fulfilled during the Interwar Period in the U.S. 12 1.3. The Satirical Portrayal of the Rising Fascist Movement . 18 1.4. The Satirical Representation of the Fascist/Totalitarian Regime . 25 2. Philip Roth’s Alternative History Novel The Plot against America: A Hypothetical Look back at a (Proto-)Fascist Regime in the U.S.A. 31 2.1. “We Were a Happy Family in 1940”: The Portrayal of Jewish Life in the U.S. prior to Lindbergh’s Nomination and Election as U.S. President . 32 2.2. “The Nation’s Savior” versus “Hitler”: The Contrasting Representation of a Controversial U.S. Political Figure . 33 2.3. “They Live in a Dream, and We Live in a Nightmare”: The Contrasting Representation of a Controversial U.S. Presidency . 38 2.4. “The Plot against America”: Conspiracies and Plots as Narrative Devices . 48 3. Robert Penn Warren’s Historiographic Novel All the King’s Men: Antidemocratic Tendencies during the Interwar Period in the U.S.A. 53 3.1. The Motif of the American Dream and Its Corruption . 54 3.2. The Satirical Description of the Personality Cult around an Antidemocratic Leader 55 3.3. Lost Illusions (of Idealism) in American Politics . 60 3.4. Corrupt Politics Corroding Democracy . 65 3.5. The Motif of a Hopeful Future in the Face of a Burdensome Past . 67 Conclusion . 71 Works Cited . 76 3 Introduction It can’t happen here – or can it? The U.S. American author Sinclair Lewis addressed this question in his 1935 novel entitled It Can’t Happen Here. What can (or cannot) happen? Judging from the book’s historic context and subject, Lewis was referring to fascism, authoritarianism and totalitarianism.1 With the rise of these antidemocratic forms of government in parts of Europe and the Soviet Union during the 1920s and ‘30s, Lewis examined this topic in a U.S. American context, including the political system as it was at the time. The background to Lewis’s novel was not only the rise of fascist/totalitarian regimes outside the U.S. but also increasingly antidemocratic and populist tendencies within the country during the 1930s. One upcoming politician who was notorious for his populist demagoguery and totalitarian ambitions was Huey Long, the governor, and later senator, of Louisiana during the late 1920s and early ‘30s. The question of whether fascism/totalitarianism could happen in the U.S. became therefore all the more pressing. But what could be the reason as to why the novel was entitled It Can’t Happen Here rather than Can It Happen Here? or It Can Happen Here (as Lewis goes on to show)? The rationale behind this is alluded to in the book itself, that is, because many people refused to believe that fascism/totalitarianism was possible in the United States. After all, the U.S. was (and still is) arguably the longest-standing democratic country in the world (Desjardins, Hauer). Furthermore, it was (and still is) widely regarded as exceptional concerning its democratic virtues and traditions.2 This widespread idea instilled (and still instills) a false belief in many Americans that fascism/totalitarianism could not spread on American soil. The concept of American exceptionalism has been discussed by many scholars. Seymour Martin Lipset considers the U.S. political system exceptional (i.e. different from all other nations), yet double-edged (as the subtitle of his 1996 scholarly work already indicates). In his view, free democracy in the U.S. necessarily comes with a number of rather negative aspects including 1 In fact, the it is not unequivocally defined in the novel. When the issue of “[i]t can(’t) happen here” is discussed in the book by various characters, they are referring to slightly different things although they all go in the direction of the abovementioned concepts of fascism, etc. 2 The term exceptional in relation to the United States was first used by the historian and political scientist Alexis de Tocqueville in the 1830s. He asserted that “[t]he position of the Americans is therefore quite exceptional, and it may be believed that no democratic people will ever be placed in a similar one” (518). 4 income inequality and low voter turnouts (13). Nevertheless, Lipset emphasizes the high level of patriotism in the United States, which includes a feeling of superiority – in terms of its social system and as a society in general – vis-à-vis other countries (51, 287-288; see also Paul 14). Deborah L. Madsen connects the notion of American exceptionalism to the United States’ self- image as “a city upon a hill” presenting the country as exemplary and thus as a model to the world (1-2).3 Donald E. Pease contends that American exceptionalism is linked to the United States being “’exempt’ from the laws of historical progress” – put differently, America is not prone to the (negative) developments of other countries (9, my emphasis). Heike Paul views American exceptionalism as the principal paradigm in American studies under which can be found “[a]ll of the myths” connected to American history (13-14), which she goes on to debunk in her 2013 work. Paul ties U.S. patriotism to the purported “exceptionality of American democratic republicanism” (15). As the abovementioned scholars argue, American exceptionalism denotes the widespread feeling of patriotism and superiority among Americans as well as the common belief that their country (including its political system) is not only exemplary but also immune to the (political and social) decline that befell other developed nations, especially during the 20th century. Up until today, one can argue that fascism/totalitarianism with a concomitant downfall of democracy has actually never happened in the U.S., so the latter theory still stands. Nonetheless, some political observers argue that this changed in 2016 with the election of Donald J. Trump as president of the United States (Sunstein).4 At any rate, during Trump’s rise to political power in 2016 and ‘17, there was a sharp increase in the sales of dystopian novels such as Sinclair Lewis’s It Can’t Happen Here, George Orwell’s 1984, Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World and Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451 (Wheeler).5 This rise in the popularity of dystopian novels in the United States around the time of Trump’s election as U.S. president speaks to a concern among the American public about the country’s (political) future, including the fear of real-life scenarios as imagined in the abovementioned novels. 3 The phrase “a city upon a hill” was famously used by John Winthrop in his lecture “A Model of Christian Charity” in 1630 (Brogan 43). 4 This thesis is not primarily concerned with whether the U.S. has become fascist or authoritarian under Trump as this, first, requires expertise in political theory and, second, is a matter of interpretation and therefore contention. 5 According to Claeys, “[d]ystopian novels are imaginary … dire futures” (269-270). 5 For the purpose of this thesis, I will investigate the portrayal of fictional antidemocratic political systems in the United States in U.S. political writing. It is worth mentioning that they do not necessarily need to fall under the category of dystopian fiction as defined by Claeys and other literary scholars. For my study, I have selected texts that take a look at the subject of antidemocratic systems from different temporal perspectives (that is, looking into the future but also into the (recent) past). To wit, the texts are Sinclair Lewis’s It Can’t Happen Here (1935) in addition to Philip Roth’s The Plot against America (2004) and Robert Penn Warren’s All the King’s Men (1946).6 Using a text-centered approach, I will analyze which literary strategies and techniques (including motifs and themes) the authors employ in order to level criticism against the idea of American exceptionalism, especially the notion that the U.S. is exemplary in its social and political system as well as exempt from negative (i.e. antidemocratic) developments. I will argue that the selected novels demonstrate that antidemocratic forms of government are indeed possible in the United States by using points of reference and allusions to parts of American history and culture where antidemocratic tendencies already came to light. These are rather general concepts such as institutional racism and illegitimate use of violence but also more concrete references to, for example, the Ku Klux Klan and political figures such as Huey Long and Charles A.
Recommended publications
  • The Plot Against America by Philip Roth
    2 Go The Plot Against America by Philip Roth Discussion Questions 1. In what ways does The Plot Against America differ from conventional historical fiction? What effects does Roth achieve by blending personal history, historical fact, and an alternative history? 2. The novel begins "Fear presides over these memories, a perpetual fear" [p. 1]. With this sentence Roth establishes that his story is being told from an adult point of view by an adult narrator who is remembering what befell his family, over sixty years earlier, when he was a boy between the ages of seven and nine. Why else does Roth open the novel this way? What role does fear play throughout the book? 3. How plausible is the alternative history that Roth imagines? How would the world be different if America had not entered the war, or entered it on the side of Germany? 4. When the Roth family plans to go to Washington, young Philip wants to take his stamp collection with him because he fears that, since he did not remove the ten- cent Lindbergh stamp, "a malignant transformation would occur in my absence, causing my unguarded Washingtons to turn into Hitlers, and swastikas to be im- printed on my National Parks" [p. 57]. What does this passage suggest about how the Lindbergh election has affected the boy? Where else does this kind of magical thinking occur in the novel? 5. Herman Roth asserts, "History is everything that happens everywhere. Even here in Newark. Even here on Summit Avenue. Even what happens in this house to an ordinary man --- that’ll be history too someday" [p.
    [Show full text]
  • Philip Roth, Henry Roth and the History of the Jews
    CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture ISSN 1481-4374 Purdue University Press ©Purdue University Volume 16 (2014) Issue 2 Article 9 Philip Roth, Henry Roth and the History of the Jews Timothy Parrish Florida State University Follow this and additional works at: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/clcweb Part of the American Literature Commons, Comparative Literature Commons, Jewish Studies Commons, Modern Literature Commons, and the Other Arts and Humanities Commons Dedicated to the dissemination of scholarly and professional information, Purdue University Press selects, develops, and distributes quality resources in several key subject areas for which its parent university is famous, including business, technology, health, veterinary medicine, and other selected disciplines in the humanities and sciences. CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture, the peer-reviewed, full-text, and open-access learned journal in the humanities and social sciences, publishes new scholarship following tenets of the discipline of comparative literature and the field of cultural studies designated as "comparative cultural studies." Publications in the journal are indexed in the Annual Bibliography of English Language and Literature (Chadwyck-Healey), the Arts and Humanities Citation Index (Thomson Reuters ISI), the Humanities Index (Wilson), Humanities International Complete (EBSCO), the International Bibliography of the Modern Language Association of America, and Scopus (Elsevier). The journal is affiliated with the Purdue University Press monograph series of Books in Comparative Cultural Studies. Contact: <[email protected]> Recommended Citation Parrish, Timothy. "Philip Roth, Henry Roth and the History of the Jews." CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture 16.2 (2014): <https://doi.org/10.7771/1481-4374.2411> This text has been double-blind peer reviewed by 2+1 experts in the field.
    [Show full text]
  • Philip Roth by Erica Wagner for the Financial Times It Was Towards The
    Philip Roth by Erica Wagner for the Financial Times It was towards the end of our hour-long conversation that Philip Roth asked me what I made of one of the characters in his novel The Humbling. It was 2009, the year his penultimate book was published, the first year of Barack Obama’s presidency. I had flown to New York on a day’s notice to meet with Roth in a bland conference room in the office of his agent, Andrew Wylie. I was glad I hadn’t had more warning; less time to worry about how this encounter with prickly titan of American letters would go. The protagonist of The Humbling is an actor, Simon Axler, sliding into despair as he ages. Drawn to suicide, he checks himself into a psychiatric hospital where he encounters a woman, Sybil Van Buren, who asks Axler to kill her husband -- he’s been abusing their daughter. Axler’s encounter with Van Buren is a strange subplot in this peculiar, unsatisfying novel that doesn’t rank among Roth’s best work. But he noticed that in the course of our talk I hadn’t mentioned her at all. Why was that? I didn’t know what to make of her, I said. I thought her story, her connection with Axler, was going to go in a different direction; I was puzzled by what Roth had done. The moment I said this it was as if I was suddenly observing myself from a great height. Philip Roth is sitting across from me, and I am telling him I don’t like what he’s done.
    [Show full text]
  • Philip Roth and the Great American Nightmare
    urrents Philip Roth and the Great American Nightmare amuel . reedman n 1959, very early in his literary career, Philip Roth wrote a short story I entitled “Eli, the Fanatic.” At the outset of the tale, nothing is fanatical about Eli, except his desire to fit in. He has ridden a law degree and the wave of postwar prosperity from working-class Newark into a leafy suburb up the slope of the Watchung Hills—the sort of suburb, the reader understands, that had barred Jews with restrictive covenants on home sales until the rev- elation of the Holocaust discredited the formal structures of American anti- Semitism. Even so, Eli feels that his station there is vulnerable. So when two survivors, one of them Hasidic, open a yeshiva out of a ramshackle home in what is supposed to be a residential neighborhood, Eli fears that their oddity will undermine his fragile new niche. He instructs the men in the importance of obeying zoning laws, and, when that doesn’t work, gives the Hasid one of his own business suits so that, at the very least, the stranger won’t attract quite so many stares as he walks down Main Street. In a final plot twist, the Hasid leaves a set of his own black garb on Eli’s porch. Eli, inexplicably drawn to it, puts on the clothes, whereupon he is committed to a lunatic asylum. Nothing in Roth’s vast oeuvre serves as a more appropriate companion volume to his latest novel, e Plot Against America, than does “Eli, the Fa- natic.” While his new book functions as tragedy (or at least near-tragedy), and the short story as farce, and while one is grand in its historical sweep / • and the other narrowly cast, both works of fiction examine the anxiety of the American Jew: e fear that every hard-won advancement, every material and social comfort—indeed, every sign of genuine acceptance in this overwhelmingly Christian nation—can be wiped away with shocking suddenness.
    [Show full text]
  • A Humoristic and Satirical Perspective to Jewish Classes in Goodbye, Colombus by Philip Roth Philip Roth'un Goodbye, Columbus
    İNSAN VE TOPLUM BİLİMLERİ ARAŞTIRMALARI DERGİSİ Cilt: 5, Sayı: 8, 2016 Sayfa: 3246-3258 A Humoristic and Satirical Perspective to Jewish Classes in Goodbye, Colombus By Philip Roth1 Faruk KALAY Yrd. Doç. Dr. MŞU, Eğitim Fakültesi [email protected] Abstract Philip Roth having Jewish ethnicity is a distinguished and famous writer in American literature. In his first novella Goodbye, Colombus, containing five other short stories, there are numbers of Jewish characters from all classes. This diversity enables the author make a good humor and flippancy in the lower and upper classes or between each other. Neil Klugman who is both narrator and protagonist of the novella living in working class neighborhood falls in love with Brenda Patimkin, a college student from a wealthy family. Roth from Klugman’s point of view satirizes and humors Jews and their relationships between themselves and Gentiles. The author manages to lampoon his society and himself as a Jew of New Jersey. In this study, Roth’s first novella written in 1959, Goodbye, Colombus will be argued in terms of satirical and humoristic characteristics. Anahtar Kelimeler: Yahudi, Sınıf, Colombus, Hiciv, Neil Klugman, Philip Roth, Nükte Philip Roth’un Goodbye, Columbus Eserinde Yahudi Sınıflarına Nükteli ve Hicivli Bir Bakış Öz Yahudi bir kimliğe sahip olan Philip Roth Amerikan edebiyatında önemli ve saygın bir yazardır. İçinde beş farklı kısa hikâye barındıran ilk kısa romanı Goodbye, Columbus’da tüm sınıflardan Yahudi karakterler barınmaktadır. Bu farklılık yazara alt ve üst sınıflarda veya her iki sınıf arasında iyi nükteyi ve hicvi mümkün kılar. İşçi sınıfı bir çevrede yaşayan kısa romanın hem anlatıcısı hem de başkahramanı olan Neil Klugman zengin bir aileden gelen üniversite öğrencisi Brenda Patimkin’e âşık olur.
    [Show full text]
  • “America First”: Fear, Memory Activism, and Everyday Life in Philip Roth's
    “America First”: Fear, Memory Activism, and Everyday Life in Philip Roth’s The Plot Against America1 LIAO Pei-chen National Cheng Kung University Memory disturbs and frightens people. —Li Youcheng, Jiyi [Memory] Fear presides over these memories, a perpetual fear. —Philip Roth, The Plot Against America Introduction Philip Roth’s The Plot Against America is an alternate-history novel, in which Charles Lindbergh defeats Franklin Roosevelt in the 1940 election and becomes the thirty-third American president. In Roth’s novel, the fictionalized Lindbergh echoes his historical counterpart, an aviation hero and a Nazi sympathizer, who was well-known for his speech, “Who Are the War Agitators?,” to the America First Committee in September, 1941. In the novel’s alternative world, the Lindbergh administration strikes a deal with Germany to keep the U.S. out of WWII and starts the widespread persecution of Jews on various levels. In the name of greater assimilation, the Office of American * This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology under Grant MOST 105- 2628-H-006-002-MY3. A Chinese article bearing a similar title has appeared in Xue yu tu er yin yu xin (Through Hearts and Minds) (ed. Wang Zhiming, Xiong Tinghui & Zhang Jinzhong [Taipei: Bookman, 2018]), but here I do more than simply translate that article into English. I restructure, substantially revise and expand it, add one new section, and sharpen the argument by incorporating alternate history and affect studies into this essay. This essay has benefitted a lot from the three anonymous reviewers’ comments and suggestions. Received: June 25, 2018/Accepted: December 17, 2018 Sun Yat-sen Journal of Humanities, no.46 (Jan.
    [Show full text]
  • Philip Roth: the Plot Against America
    Literary Encyclopedia: head Roth, Philip: The Plot Against America (2004) Derek Parker Royal (Western Illinois University) Genre: Novel. Country: United States. In many ways, The Plot Against America stands out as an anomaly within Philip Roth’s oeuvre, if not in substance, then at least in the degree to which he uses his various narrative devices. For instance, Roth has written alternate (or at least speculative) histories before, such as in The Ghost Writer (1979) or the story I’ve Always Wanted You to Admire My Fasting’; or, Looking at Kafka (1973), but never outside of the realm of a character’s imaginings. He has taken on very contemporary political issues beforemost notably his scathing rendering of Richard Nixon in Our Gang (1971)but not without the distancing mask of satire. And perhaps most significantly, The Plot Against America is one of the few works of fiction to be narrated or focalized through the perspective of a young boy. Not since the 1950s (e.g., The Conversion of the Jews in Goodbye, Columbus and Five Short Stories or uncollected stories such as The Day It Snowed) has he chosen to write through the eyes of anyone younger than a college-bound teenager. It is this choice of a younger narrative voice, one unsure of the political levity of his times, that gives the novel its poignancy and a sense of historical urgency. Yet in other ways, The Plot Against America is representative of what the novelist has been doing over the past fifteen years. As he did in the American Trilogy (American Pastoral, 1997; I Married a Communist, 1998; and The Human Stain, 2000), Roth once again turns to twentieth-century American history as his narrative backdrop.
    [Show full text]
  • The Plot Against America by Philip Roth About the Book…
    The Plot Against America By Philip Roth About the book…. Set in Newark, New Jersey, in the early 1940s, The Plot Against America tells the story of what it was like for the Roth family and Jews across the country when the isolationist aviation hero Charles Lindbergh was elected president of the United States. Roth's richly imagined novel begins in 1940, with the landslide election of Lindbergh, who blamed the Jews for pushing America toward war with Nazi Germany. Lindbergh's admiration of Hitler and his openly anti-Semitic speeches cause increasing turmoil in the Roth household, and in nine-year-old Philip, as political events at home and abroad overtake their daily lives. Alvin, the orphaned nephew the family has taken in, runs away to Canada to fight the Nazis. Sandy, Philip's older brother, ascribes his parents' fears to paranoia and embraces Lindbergh's Just Folks program, which sends him and other Jewish children to live in the "heartland" for a summer. Philip's mother, Bess, wants the family to flee to Canada before it is too late to escape. But his fiercely idealistic father, Herman, refuses to abandon the country where he was born and raised as an American. Overwhelmed by the tensions around him, Philip tries to run away. "I wanted nothing to do with history," he says. "I wanted to be a boy on the smallest scale possible. I wanted to be an orphan." But history will not let go, and as America is whipped into a deadly frenzy by demagogues, the Roths and Jews everywhere begin to expect the worst.
    [Show full text]
  • Kvarterakademisk
    kvarter Volume 17. Spring 2018 • on the web akademiskacademic quarter “Memoir” as Counter-Narrative Reimagining the Self in Roth’s The Plot Against America Howard Sklar is University Lecturer in the Department of Languages at the University of Helsinki. In his research, he has focused prima- rily on American literature, with emphases in narrative ethics, narrative sympathy, and the representation of intellectual disa- bility in fiction. He is the author of The Art of Sympathy in Fiction: Forms of Ethical and Emotional Persuasion (John Benjamins), among other works. “To be a Jew is to be set apart from other men, it is also to be set apart from oneself.” Albert Memmi, Portrait of a Jew (1962, 59). Abstract Philip Roth’s 2004 novel The Plot Against America famously imagi- nes what America might have been like had the aviator Charles Lindbergh, a Nazi sympathizer, won the 1940 election for Presi- dent of the United States. That alternate history is focalized through the experiences of Roth as a young boy – or those that the author- as-character has conceived within this radically altered world, with the real-world Holocaust as backdrop. By identifying a gen- uine counter-historical potentiality – one that is grounded in actual anti-Semitic insecurities that prevailed at the time, even in the relatively tranquil American context – Roth’s counter-narrative reimagines his actual past by redefining the significance of his identity as a Jew. At the same time, rather than presenting a por- trait of “the American Jewish experience” of the period by concep- tualizing Jews and Jewish experience monolithically, Roth man- ages to embrace the complexities and ambiguities of his search for Volume 17 23 “Memoir” as Counter-Narrative kvarter Howard Sklar akademiskacademic quarter self-definition, of which his Jewishness remains an enigmatic but essential part.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography for the Study of Phillip Roth's Works
    CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture ISSN 1481-4374 Purdue University Press ©Purdue University Volume 16 (2014) Issue 2 Article 14 Bibliography for the Study of Phillip Roth's Works Gustavo Sánchez-Canales Autónoma University Madrid Victoria Aarons Trinity University Follow this and additional works at: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/clcweb Part of the American Studies Commons, Comparative Literature Commons, Education Commons, European Languages and Societies Commons, Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Commons, Other Arts and Humanities Commons, Other Film and Media Studies Commons, Reading and Language Commons, Rhetoric and Composition Commons, Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons, Television Commons, and the Theatre and Performance Studies Commons Dedicated to the dissemination of scholarly and professional information, Purdue University Press selects, develops, and distributes quality resources in several key subject areas for which its parent university is famous, including business, technology, health, veterinary medicine, and other selected disciplines in the humanities and sciences. CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture, the peer-reviewed, full-text, and open-access learned journal in the humanities and social sciences, publishes new scholarship following tenets of the discipline of comparative literature and the field of cultural studies designated as "comparative cultural studies." Publications in the journal are indexed in the Annual Bibliography of English Language and Literature (Chadwyck-Healey), the Arts and Humanities Citation Index (Thomson Reuters ISI), the Humanities Index (Wilson), Humanities International Complete (EBSCO), the International Bibliography of the Modern Language Association of America, and Scopus (Elsevier). The journal is affiliated with the Purdue University Press monograph series of Books in Comparative Cultural Studies. Contact: <[email protected]> Recommended Citation Sánchez-Canales, Gustavo; and Aarons, Victoria.
    [Show full text]
  • History and Fear in Philip Roth's the Plot Against
    “THE CURSE NEVER FELL UPON OUR NATION TILL NOW”: HISTORY AND FEAR IN PHILIP ROTH’S THE PLOT AGAINST AMERICA by MICHAEL LYNN BRITTAIN Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Arlington in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS IN ENGLISH THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON MAY 2006 Copyright © by Michael Lynn Brittain 2006 All Rights Reserved ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my committee chairperson, Dr. Laurie Porter, for her guidance, patience, and insight in this endeavor. Dr. Porter spent many hours working with me on this project, and I am eternally grateful for her encouragement and counsel. I would also like to thank my other committee members, Dr. Tim Morris and Dr. Ken Roemer, for providing helpful suggestions and guidance with my research. I also want to offer special thanks to Dr. Emory Estes for his unending encouragement and inspiration. I have the utmost respect for all of these professors. I must also thank my wonderful wife, Rhonda, for her encouragement, patience, and love. Her support and enthusiasm have been a constant throughout my academic career, and I could not have done any of this without her. She is my hero. I must also offer special thanks to my family and friends who have stood by me as I pursue my dreams. I am a very blessed man. April 17, 2006 iii ABSTRACT “THE CURSE NEVER FELL UPON OUR NATION TILL NOW”: HISTORY AND FEAR IN PHILIP ROTH’S THE PLOT AGAINST AMERICA Publication No.
    [Show full text]
  • Philip Roth/Nathan Zuckerman/Philip Roth Written/Written/Unwritten" (2015)
    Bard College Bard Digital Commons Senior Projects Spring 2015 Bard Undergraduate Senior Projects Spring 2015 Philip Roth/Nathan Zuckerman/Philip Roth Written/Written/ Unwritten Grayson Gibbs Bard College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.bard.edu/senproj_s2015 Part of the Literature in English, North America, Ethnic and Cultural Minority Commons This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Recommended Citation Gibbs, Grayson, "Philip Roth/Nathan Zuckerman/Philip Roth Written/Written/Unwritten" (2015). Senior Projects Spring 2015. 80. https://digitalcommons.bard.edu/senproj_s2015/80 This Open Access work is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been provided to you by Bard College's Stevenson Library with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this work in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights- holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/or on the work itself. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Introduction “…and the likeness to him was wonderful.” - Book 23, line 106-7. p. 475. The Iliad. Translated by Richmond Lattimore. “Think of the ventriloquist. He speaks so that his voice appears to proceed fom someone at a distance fom himself. But if he weren’t in your line of vision you’d get no pleasure fom his art at al. His art consists of being present and absent; he’s most himself by simultaneously being someone else, neither of whom he “is” once the curtain is down.
    [Show full text]