DOCSLIB.ORG

Election Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

2015-2016 Election Report Political Action Committee Political Action Committee A Message from the AGC PAC Co-Chairs GC PAC is the nonpartisan political action committee (PAC) sponsored by AGC of America. It is registered with the U.S. Federal Election ACommission and allows eligible employees of AGC member companies to pool personal, voluntary financial contributions. The contributions are used to support candidates running for elective office who, regardless of party affiliation, understand the construction industry and the specific needs, interests and concerns of AGC member companies and their employees. Chuck Greco During the 2015-2016 election cycle, AGC PAC raised just shy of Linbeck Group LLC $1 million and contributed $943,750 to 212 federal candidates and AGC PAC Co-Chair committees. Of the 202 AGC PAC-backed candidates running on Election Day, 95 percent of them were successfully elected to the 115th Congress! AGC PAC’s ongoing tenacity and resolve in the political arena have made it one of the most recognized and well-respected PACs on Capitol Hill, ranking among the top 100 trade association PACs in the nation — earning it the “Heavy Hitter” status from the Center for Responsive Politics. Al Landes Herzog Contracting Corp. Chuck Greco Al Landes AGC PAC Co-Chair 21 Table of Contents Financial Summary. .................................................. 3 Key Statistics ........................................................... 4 Fundraising by State ........................................... 5 – 6 Disbursements ................................................. 7 – 18 Non-Candidates .................................................. 7 Candidates .................................................. 8 – 18 Criteria for AGC PAC Disbursements hroughout a two-year election cycle, AGC PAC receives hundreds Tof requests to fund campaigns, other PACs, and party committees. With limited resources, AGC PAC must prioritize its disbursements to those entities most supportive of AGC’s legislative priorities. The AGC PAC Board of Trustees, a group which includes 18 individuals from AGC member companies, a chapter executive representative, and the PAC Treasurer, reviews such requests and approves the contributions for disbursement. Trustees use the following evaluation criteria: • Local chapter and member input • Understanding or connection to the construction industry • AGC current and lifetime congressional voting record • Candidate questionnaire and interview (if a first-time candidate) • Legislative strategy • Variable election factors such as demographic profile of the district, fundraising ability, polling data and previous election results • Chapter and individual member support for AGC PAC AGC PAC may contribute up to $5,000 per election (primary, general, or run-off) to a federal candidate’s campaign. It may also contribute up to $5,000 per year to a federal PAC, or up to $15,000 to a national party committee. Contribution amounts vary depending upon the aforementioned criteria. 2 AGC PAC Financial Summary Primary 2015General 2016 Total District EndorsedCandidate Candidate Party Incumb. PrimaryElection Election Result Balance from 2013–2014 Cycle $174,408 — $174,408 Receipts: Individual Contributions $425,899 $486,029 $911,928 Federal PACs $2,600 $2,500 $5,100 Interest Income $727 $741 $1,468 Total $429,226 $489,270 $918,496 Disbursements: Candidates, Committees, & PACs $349,500 $594,250 $943,750 Income Taxes $195 $219 $414 Other Disbursements $3,664 ­— $3,664 Total $353,359 $594,469 $947,828 Cash-on-Hand $145,076 3 Key Statistics Primary General District EndorsedCandidate Candidate Party Incumb. PrimaryElection Election Result Fundraising Donors 2015 2016 Cycle FINANCES Presidential Trust Members 16 19 21 ($5,000 Annually) Senatorial Council Members 20 26 34 (minimum of $2,500 Annually) Congressional Caucus Members 136 152 191 (minimum of $1,500 Annually) Grassroots Members 83 90 134 (minimum of $500 Annually) Under $500 228 245 299 Disbursements Supported Candidates 212 202 Winning Candidates Candidates Candidates US Senate Supported Running on During Election Day 27 Election Cycle 23 US House of Representatives 175 95% 169 Running on Election Day Percentage of Candidates 202 Who Won on Election Day 192 Amount Disbursed to: Federal PACs $62,500 National Committees $125,000 US Senate Candidates $177,000 US House Candidates $579,250 4 Fundraising by State TotalPrimary GeneralTotal District EndorsedCandidateState Candidate DonorsParty Incumb.Receipts PrimaryElection DisbursementsElection Difference Result Alabama 23 $23,800 $13,000 $10,800 Alaska 7 $10,450 $10,000 $450 Arizona1 33 $49,203 $19,000 $30,203 Arkansas 3 $7,650 $9,000 ($1,350) California 30 $60,625 $49,500 $11,125 Colorado 9 $10,025 $14,000 ($3,975) Connecticut 2 $1,200 $2,000 ($800) DC 8 $13,300 — $13,300 Delaware 1 $100 — $100 Florida 13 $13,260 $51,500 ($38,240) Georgia 61 $76,163 $42,000 $34,163 Hawaii 19 $8,850 — $8,850 Idaho 1 $100 $12,500 ($12,400) Illinois 23 $40,300 $49,500 ($9,200) Indiana 3 $3,500 $26,500 ($23,000) Iowa 6 $5,900 $9,000 ($3,100) Kansas 33 $12,100 $13,500 ($1,400) Kentucky 24 $5,250 $18,000 ($12,750) Louisiana 12 $16,100 $19,000 ($2,900) Maine 7 $13,600 — $13,600 Maryland 1 $865 $9,500 ($8,635) Massachusetts 2 $2,100 — $2,100 Michigan 9 $16,000 $17,500 ($1,500) Minnesota 5 $10,500 $14,000 ($3,500) Mississippi 3 $3,200 $2,000 $1,200 Missouri 16 $40,245 $25,000 $15,245 Montana 4 $8,000 $3,500 $4,500 Nebraska 5 $3,200 $4,500 ($1,300) 5 Fundraising by State Total PrimaryTotal General DistrictState EndorsedCandidate DonorsCandidate PartyReceipts Incumb. Disbursements PrimaryElection ElectionDifference Result Nevada 25 $8,900 $35,000 ($26,100) New Hampshire 0 — $15,000 ($15,000) New Jersey 3 $2,700 $5,000 ($2,300) New Mexico 6 $11,035 — $11,035 New York 22 $29,050 $40,750 ($11,700) FUNDRAISING North Carolina 12 $15,920 $28,000 ($12,080) North Dakota 8 $30,000 $6,000 $24,000 Ohio 6 $25,100 $44,000 ($18,900) Oklahoma 8 $12,050 $8,500 $3,550 Oregon 17 $32,444 $15,500 $16,944 Pennsylvania 34 $26,750 $58,500 ($31,750) Puerto Rico 0 — — $0 Rhode Island 0 — $1,000 ($1,000) South Carolina 2 $2,500 $6,000 ($3,500) South Dakota 23 $20,400 $8,500 $11,900 Tennessee2 39 $54,111 $12,500 $41,611 Texas 53 $110,556 $39,000 $71,556 Utah 6 $13,000 $2,000 $11,000 Vermont 1 $2,000 — $2,000 Virginia 4 $8,000 $23,500 ($15,500) Washington 21 $20,850 $24,500 ($3,650) West Virginia 1 $3,000 $2,000 $1,000 Wisconsin 4 $5,700 $40,500 ($34,800) Wyoming 3 $3,850 — $3,850 AGC of America Staff 10 $24,655 — $24,655 1. Includes $47,005 from 34 Sundt Construction employees 2. Includes $45,411 from Mississippi Valley Branch — AGC 6 Non-Candidate Disbursements Federal PACs 2015 2016 Bill PAC (Rep. Bill Shuster) — $5,000 Bluegrass Committee (Sen. Mitch McConnell) $5,000 $5,000 Freedom and Security PAC (Rep. John Kline) $2,500 — Fund for a Conservative Future (Sen. Jim Inhofe) $2,500 — Healthcare Freedom Fund (Rep. Phil Roe) $5,000 — More Conservatives PAC (Rep. Patrick McHenry) $2,500 — Nebraska Sandhills PAC (Sen. Deb Fischer) $2,500 — Prosperity Action Inc. (Rep. Paul Ryan) $5,000 $5,000 Republican Main Street Partnership $5,000 $5,000 Together Holding Our Majority PAC (Sen. Thom Tillis) $2,500 — Tuesday Group PAC $5,000 $5,000 Committees 2015 2016 National Republican Congressional Committee — $15,000 National Republican Senatorial Committee $15,000 $15,000 NRSC Targeted State Victory — $25,000 Republican National Committee $15,000 $15,000 Win in 2016 — $25,000 7 Disbursements by Candidate Lifetime Primary General District Endorsed Candidate Party Incumb. Vote Record Election Election Result ALASKA AK-AL Don Young R Yes 76% $2,500 $2,500 Won AK-Sen Lisa Murkowski R Yes 88% $5,0001 $2,500 Won ALABAMA AL-01 Bradley Byrne R Yes 94% $3,500 — Won AL-02 Martha Roby R Yes 87% $5,000 — Won DISBURSEMENTS AL-03 Mike Rogers R Yes 85% $1,000 — Won AL-06 Gary Palmer R Yes 62% $1,000 — Won AL-Sen Richard Shelby R Yes 67% — $2,500 Won arkansas AR-01 Rick Crawford R Yes 92% $1,000 — Won AR-02 French Hill R Yes 100% $1,000 — Won AR-03 Steve Womack R Yes 97% — $1,000 Won AR-04 Bruce Westerman R Yes 92% — $1,000 Won AR-Sen John Boozman R Yes 87% $2,500 $2,500 Won ariZONA AZ-02 Martha McSally R Yes 100% $5,000 $2,500 Won AZ-09 Kyrsten Sinema D Yes 67% — $1,500 Won AZ-Sen John McCain R Yes 68% $5,000 — Won CALIFOrnia CA-01 Doug LaMalfa R Yes 81% $1,500 — Won CA-08 Paul Cook R Yes 93% — $1,000 Won CA-10 Jeff Denham R Yes 97% $5,000 $5,000 Won CA-21 David Valadao R Yes 100% $2,500 $5,000 Won CA-22 Devin Nunes R Yes 87% — $1,000 Won 1. Includes $2,500 contributed in 2012 8 Disbursements by Candidate (Continued) Lifetime Primary General District Endorsed Candidate Party Incumb. Vote Record Election Election Result CA-23 Kevin McCarthy R Yes 86% $5,000 $5,000 Won CA-25 Steve Knight R Yes 100% $1,000 $4,000 Won CA-42 Ken Calvert R Yes 91% $2,500 $2,500 Won CA-45 Mimi Walters R Yes 100% $1,000 $1,500 Won CA-49 Darrell Issa R Yes 83% — $2,500 Won CA-50 Duncan Hunter R Yes 88% $1,000 $1,000 Won CA-52 Denise Gitsham R No — — $1,500 Lost COLOradO CO-03 Scott Tipton R Yes 85% $2,500 — Won CO-04 Ken Buck R Yes 67% $1,500 — Won CO-06 Mike Coffman R Yes 85% $5,000 $5,000 Won COnnecticut CT-02 Joe Courtney D Yes 45% — $1,000 Won CT-05 Elizabeth Esty D Yes 52% $1,000 — Won FLOrida FL-01 Matt Gaetz R No — — $2,000 Won FL-01 Jeff Miller R Yes 76% $2,500 — Retired FL-02 Neal Dunn R No — $2,500 — Won FL-04 Ander Crenshaw R Yes 91% $1,500 — Retired FL-07 John Mica R Yes 89% $2,500 $5,000 Lost FL-16 Vern Buchanan R Yes 91% $1,000 — Won FL-18 Brian Mast R No — — $5,000 Won FL-18 Patrick Murphy D Yes 67% $2,500 — Ran for Sen.
Recommended publications
  • November 2020 Election Results (Results As of November 30, 2020) U.S

    November 2020 Election Results (Results As of November 30, 2020) U.S

    New York State Congressional Delegation November 2020 Election Results (Results as of November 30, 2020) U.S. Senate 116th Congress (Jan. 2019 - Jan. 2021) 117th Congress (Jan. 2021 - Jan. 2023) Senator Charles Schumer (D) Senator Charles Schumer (D) (Up for re-election in 2022) Senator Kirsten Gillibrand (D) Senator Kirsten Gillibrand (D) (Up for re-election in Jan 2024) U.S. House of Representatives 116th Congress (Jan. 2019 - Jan. 2021) 117th Congress (Jan. 2021 - Jan. 2023) NY – 1 Lee Zeldin (R-Shirley) Lee Zeldin (R-Shirley) NY – 2 Peter King (R-Seaford) (Ret.) Andrew Garbarino (R-Sayville) NY – 3 Thomas Suozzi (D-Glen Cove) Thomas Suozzi (D-Glen Cove) NY – 4 Kathleen Rice (D-Mineola) Kathleen Rice (D-Mineola) NY – 5 Gregory Meeks (D-Far Rockaway) Gregory Meeks (D-Far Rockaway) NY – 6 Grace Meng (D-Queens) Grace Meng (D-Queens) NY – 7 Nydia Velazquez (D-Brooklyn) Nydia Velazquez (D-Brooklyn) NY – 8 Hakeem Jeffries (D-Brooklyn) Hakeem Jeffries (D-Brooklyn) NY – 9 Yvette Clarke (D-Brooklyn) Yvette Clarke (D-Brooklyn) NY – 10 Jerrold Nadler (D-Manhattan) Jerrold Nadler (D-Manhattan) NY – 11 Max Rose (D-Staten Island) Nicole Malliotakis (R-Staten Island) NY – 12 Carolyn Maloney (D-Manhattan) Carolyn Maloney (D-Manhattan) NY – 13 Adriano Espaillat (D-Manhattan) Adriano Espaillat (D-Manhattan) NY – 14 Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-Queens) Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-Queens) NY – 15 Jose Serrano (D-Bronx) (Ret.) Ritchie Torres (D-Bronx) NY – 16 Eliot Engel (D-Bronx) Jamaal Bowman (D-Yonkers) NY – 17 Nita Lowey (D-Harrison) (Ret.) Mondaire
  • 1605026 NY Spotlight Memo

    1605026 NY Spotlight Memo

    ! MEMORANDUM TO: Interested Parties FROM: Alixandria Lapp, Executive Director, House Majority PAC DATE: May 26, 2016 RE: Congressional Democrats Poised for Pick-Ups Across the Empire State With just over a month until New York’s June 28 congressional primaries, and just under six months from the November general election, Democrats are poised for significant pick-ups in congressional districts across the Empire State. This year Democrats are overwhelmingly on offense in New York – with at least six Republican held seats that could be flipped this November. Multiple Republican incumbents and challengers are finding their already-precarious political prospects diminishing even further as they struggle with a damaging party brand, a toxic presidential ticket-mate, and increasingly prove themselves out of touch with their own districts. Bottom line: With New York’s congressional Republicans increasingly vulnerable heading into the fall, Democrats are overwhelmingly on offense and well-positioned to win key districts across the state in 2016. New York Republicans Tied to Toxic Brand As in any presidential year, down-ballot races will be heavily shaped by the top of the ticket. For Republicans, particularly in New York, that’s bad news. Even before the GOP presidential race took shape, New York’s congressional Republicans faced significant structural political challenges. In six competitive Republican-held districts, President Obama either won or came within 1% of winning in 2008 and 2012. Now with Donald Trump as their presidential ticket-mate, down-ballot prospects for New York Republicans are far worse. Earlier this month, a poll by Morning Consult found that nearly half of all Americans would “be less likely to support candidates for public office if they say they back Donald Trump.” And despite Donald Trump’s big win in New York’s presidential primary, there’s no indication that it will translate to success in November.
  • The History of Redistricting in Georgia

    The History of Redistricting in Georgia

    GEORGIA LAW REVIEW(DO NOT DELETE) 11/6/2018 8:33 PM THE HISTORY OF REDISTRICTING IN GEORGIA Charles S. Bullock III* In his memoirs, Chief Justice Earl Warren singled out the redistricting cases as the most significant decisions of his tenure on the Court.1 A review of the changes redistricting introduced in Georgia supports Warren’s assessment. Not only have the obligations to equalize populations across districts and to do so in a racially fair manner transformed the makeup of the state’s collegial bodies, Georgia has provided the setting for multiple cases that have defined the requirements to be met when designing districts. Other than the very first adjustments that occurred in the 1960s, changes in Georgia plans had to secure approval from the federal government pursuant to the Voting Rights Act. Also, the first four decades of the Redistricting Revolution occurred with a Democratic legislature and governor in place. Not surprisingly, the partisans in control of redistricting sought to protect their own and as that became difficult they employed more extreme measures. When in the minority, Republicans had no chance to enact plans on their own. Beginning in the 1980s and peaking a decade later, Republicans joined forces with black Democrats to devise alternatives to the proposals of white Democrats. The biracial, bipartisan coalition never had sufficient numbers to enact its ideas. After striking out in the legislature, African-Americans appealed to the U.S. Attorney General alleging that the plans enacted were less favorable to black interests than alternatives * Charles S. Bullock, III is a University Professor of Public and International Affairs at the University of Georgia where he holds the Richard B.
  • 114TH CONGRESS / First Session Available at Frcaction.Org/Scorecard

    114TH CONGRESS / First Session Available at Frcaction.Org/Scorecard

    FRC ACTION VOTE SCORECARD 114TH CONGRESS / First Session Available at FRCAction.org/scorecard U.S. House of Representatives and U.S. Senate Dear Voter and Friend of the Family, FRC Action presents our Vote Scorecard for the First Session of the 114th Congress. This online Scorecard contains a compilation of significant votes on federal legislation affecting faith, family, and freedom that FRC Action either supported or opposed. These recorded votes span the 2015 calendar year and include the greatest number of pro-life votes in history, after the U.S. House increased its Republican membership and the U.S. Senate was returned to Republican control. The year began with a bipartisan effort in the House to prohibit federal funds from being used to pay for abortion coverage under Obamacare. Congress successfully fought to restrict FDA approval of some forms of embryo-destructive research. The House, once again, passed legislation that would prevent late abortions on 5 month old pain-capable unborn children, and although the Senate was unable to pass the bill due to the 60 vote threshold, for the first time, a majority of Senators voted in favor of the bill. The public release of videos revealing Planned Parenthood’s organ harvesting practices renewed efforts to defund this scandal-ridden organization and redirect funding towards community health centers. In an unprecedented victory, the House and Senate passed a budget reconciliation bill, the Restoring Ameri- cans’ Healthcare Freedom Reconciliation Act, which would have eliminated a significant portion of Planned Parenthood’s funding—roughly 80%— and repealed key provisions of Obamacare.
  • Newly Elected Representatives in the 114Th Congress

    Newly Elected Representatives in the 114Th Congress

    Newly Elected Representatives in the 114th Congress Contents Representative Gary Palmer (Alabama-6) ....................................................................................................... 3 Representative Ruben Gallego (Arizona-7) ...................................................................................................... 4 Representative J. French Hill (Arkansas-2) ...................................................................................................... 5 Representative Bruce Westerman (Arkansas-4) .............................................................................................. 6 Representative Mark DeSaulnier (California-11) ............................................................................................. 7 Representative Steve Knight (California-25) .................................................................................................... 8 Representative Peter Aguilar (California-31) ................................................................................................... 9 Representative Ted Lieu (California-33) ........................................................................................................ 10 Representative Norma Torres (California-35) ................................................................................................ 11 Representative Mimi Walters (California-45) ................................................................................................ 12 Representative Ken Buck (Colorado-4) .........................................................................................................

  • Bloomberg Politics GOP Unity Tracker

    Bloomberg Politics GOP Unity Tracker Below is a list of who current Republican office-holders, mega-donors, and influential conservatives plan to support in November, as of Bloomberg's latest count on June 7, 2016. Name Unity Status Group State Gov. Robert Bentley Trump supporter Elected Officials Alabama Rep. Bradley Byrne Trump supporter Elected Officials Alabama Rep. Martha Roby Trump supporter Elected Officials Alabama Rep. Mike Rogers Trump supporter Elected Officials Alabama Rep. Robert Aderholt Trump supporter Elected Officials Alabama Sen. Jeff Sessions Trump supporter Elected Officials Alabama Rep. Trent Franks Trump supporter Elected Officials Arizona Rep. Steve Womack Trump supporter Elected Officials Arkansas Rep. Darrell Issa Trump supporter Elected Officials California Rep. Duncan Hunter Trump supporter Elected Officials California Rep. Ken Calvert Trump supporter Elected Officials California Rep. Kevin McCarthy Trump supporter Elected Officials California Rep. Mimi Walters Trump supporter Elected Officials California Rep. Paul Cook Trump supporter Elected Officials California Rep. Tom McClintock Trump supporter Elected Officials California Rep. Doug Lamborn Trump supporter Elected Officials Colorado Rep. Scott Tipton Trump supporter Elected Officials Colorado Gov. Rick Scott Trump supporter Elected Officials Florida Rep. Curt Clawson Trump supporter Elected Officials Florida Rep. Dennis Ross Trump supporter Elected Officials Florida Rep. Jeff Miller Trump supporter Elected Officials Florida Rep. John Mica Trump supporter Elected Officials Florida Rep. Ted Yoho Trump supporter Elected Officials Florida Rep. Vern Buchanan Trump supporter Elected Officials Florida Gov. Nathan Deal Trump supporter Elected Officials Georgia Rep. Austin Scott Trump supporter Elected Officials Georgia Rep. Doug Collins Trump supporter Elected Officials Georgia Rep. Lynn Westmoreland Trump supporter Elected Officials Georgia Rep.
  • Commissioners Meet with Georgia Congressional Delegation to Express Views on Pending Energy Legislation

    Commissioners Meet with Georgia Congressional Delegation to Express Views on Pending Energy Legislation

    Georgia Public Service 244 Washington St S.W. Contact: Bill Edge Atlanta, Georgia 30334 Phone 404-656-2316 Commission Phone: 404-656-4501 www.psc.state.ga.us Toll free: 800-282-5813 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 15-09 NEWS RELEASE Commissioners Meet with Georgia Congressional Delegation to Express Views on Pending Energy Legislation Atlanta, July 23, 2009 – Public Service Commission Chairman Doug Everett along with Commissioners Lauren “Bubba” McDonald, Jr. and Stan Wise traveled to the nation’s Capitol Wednesday to voice their concerns to Georgia’s Congressional Delegation about the pending energy and climate legislation, known as “cap and trade,” which will dramatically increase Georgian’s utility bills in the coming years. “Unless this legislation is modified and revised, Georgians could see their electric utility bills go up by as much as $66 a month by 2020,” said Everett. “Ultimately, we want to find a way to sculpt a bill that has less impact on Georgians,” Commissioner Stan Wise told the delegation members. Commission Vice-Chairman Lauren “Bubba” McDonald, Jr. said, “We were pleased with the reception afforded us by members of Georgia’s Congressional Delegation and will continue working with them through the legislative process.” Among the several key areas of concern brought to the Delegation’s attention: Allocations: Restricting, limiting and auctioning of allocations will increase rates to ratepayers. Delaying the phase out of allocations and beginning the auctions at a later date will give technologies time to develop to meet these requirements, mitigating impacts to customers. Dates and Caps: Requirements in the bill do not match with the timing for development of new technologies.
  • 2019 Political Disbursements Federal Candidates Disbursement Ratio

    2019 Political Disbursements Federal Candidates Disbursement Ratio

    2019 Political Disbursements Federal Candidates Disbursement Ratio Name Amount Democrat Alabama Sen. Doug Jones (D) $2,500 41% California Rep. Amerish Bera (D) $2,000 59% Rep. Devin Nunes (R) $2,000 Rep. Jimmy Gomez (D) $1,000 Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R) $5,000 Republican Rep. Linda Sanchez (D) $2,000 Rep. Mark Takano (D) $1,000 Rep. Raul Ruiz (D) $2,500 Name Amount Rep. Scott Peters (D) $1,000 Sen. Joyce Krawsiec (R) $1,000 Rep. Ted Lieu (D) $500 Rep. Graig Meyer (D) $500 Delaware Sen. Jim Perry (D) $500 Sen. Christopher Coons (D) $1,000 Rep. Larry Potts (R) $500 Rep. Robert Reives (D) $500 Florida Sen. Gladys Robinson (D) $500 Rep. Greg Steube (R) $1,000 Rep. Wayne Sasser (R) $500 Rep. Stephanie Murphy (D) $2,000 Sen. Mike Woodard (D) $500 Georgia Rep. Mark Meadows (R) $1,000 Rep. Douglas Collins (R) $2,500 Rep. Richard Hudson (R) $5,000 Sen. Thom Tillis (R) $4,000 Hawaii Sen. Mazie Hirono (D) $500 North Dakota Rep. Kelly Armstrong (R) $500 Illinois Rep. Brad Schneider (D) $4,000 Nebraska Rep. Cheri Bustos (D) $2,500 Rep. Adrian Smith (R) $2,500 Rep. Darin LaHood (R) $2,500 Nevada Rep. Mike Bost (R) $2,000 Sen. Jacky Rosen (D) $1,000 Rep. Mike Quigley (D) $1,000 Rep. Robin Kelly (D) $1,000 New Hampshire Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R) $1,000 Rep. Ann McClane Kuster (D) $2,000 Rep. S. Raja Krishnamoorthi (D) $1,000 New York Sen. Tammy Duckworth (D) $1,000 Rep. Elise Stefanik (R) $2,000 Sen.
  • Official List of Members

    Official List of Members

    OFFICIAL LIST OF MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES of the UNITED STATES AND THEIR PLACES OF RESIDENCE ONE HUNDRED SIXTEENTH CONGRESS • DECEMBER 15, 2020 Compiled by CHERYL L. JOHNSON, Clerk of the House of Representatives http://clerk.house.gov Democrats in roman (233); Republicans in italic (195); Independents and Libertarians underlined (2); vacancies (5) CA08, CA50, GA14, NC11, TX04; total 435. The number preceding the name is the Member's district. ALABAMA 1 Bradley Byrne .............................................. Fairhope 2 Martha Roby ................................................ Montgomery 3 Mike Rogers ................................................. Anniston 4 Robert B. Aderholt ....................................... Haleyville 5 Mo Brooks .................................................... Huntsville 6 Gary J. Palmer ............................................ Hoover 7 Terri A. Sewell ............................................. Birmingham ALASKA AT LARGE Don Young .................................................... Fort Yukon ARIZONA 1 Tom O'Halleran ........................................... Sedona 2 Ann Kirkpatrick .......................................... Tucson 3 Raúl M. Grijalva .......................................... Tucson 4 Paul A. Gosar ............................................... Prescott 5 Andy Biggs ................................................... Gilbert 6 David Schweikert ........................................ Fountain Hills 7 Ruben Gallego ............................................
  • Arkansas Civics Exam Study Guide

    Arkansas Civics Exam Study Guide

    Arkansas Civics Exam Study Guide Principles of American Democracy 1. What is the supreme law of the land? Answer: The Constitution 2. What does the Constitution do? Answer: Set up and define the government and protect the basic rights of Americans 3. The idea of self-government is in the first three words of the Constitution. What are these words? Answer: We the People 4. What is an amendment? Answer: A change or addition to the Constitution 5. What do we call the first ten amendments to the Constitution? Answer: The Bill of Rights 6. Which of the following are rights or freedoms from the First Amendment? [Mark all that apply.] Answers: ● Speech ● Religion ● Assembly ● Press ● Petition the government 7. How many amendments does the Constitution have? Answer: 27 8. What did the Declaration of Independence do? Answer: Declare our independence from Great Britain 9. What are the rights declared in the Declaration of Independence? [Mark all that apply.] Answers: ● Life ● Liberty ● Pursuit of happiness 10. What is freedom of religion? Answer: A person can practice any religion, or no religion 11. What is the economic system in the United States? Answer: A capitalist (or market) economy 12. What is the “rule of law”? Answer: The idea that everyone, including leaders, must obey the law System of Government 13. Which of the following are branches of the government? [Mark all that apply.] Answers: ● Legislative ● Executive ● Judicial 14. What stops ​one​ branch of government from becoming too powerful? Answer: Checks and balances 15. Who is in charge of the executive branch? Answer: The President 16.
  • 115Th Congress Roster.Xlsx

    115Th Congress Roster.Xlsx

    State-District 114th Congress 115th Congress 114th Congress Alabama R D AL-01 Bradley Byrne (R) Bradley Byrne (R) 248 187 AL-02 Martha Roby (R) Martha Roby (R) AL-03 Mike Rogers (R) Mike Rogers (R) 115th Congress AL-04 Robert Aderholt (R) Robert Aderholt (R) R D AL-05 Mo Brooks (R) Mo Brooks (R) 239 192 AL-06 Gary Palmer (R) Gary Palmer (R) AL-07 Terri Sewell (D) Terri Sewell (D) Alaska At-Large Don Young (R) Don Young (R) Arizona AZ-01 Ann Kirkpatrick (D) Tom O'Halleran (D) AZ-02 Martha McSally (R) Martha McSally (R) AZ-03 Raúl Grijalva (D) Raúl Grijalva (D) AZ-04 Paul Gosar (R) Paul Gosar (R) AZ-05 Matt Salmon (R) Matt Salmon (R) AZ-06 David Schweikert (R) David Schweikert (R) AZ-07 Ruben Gallego (D) Ruben Gallego (D) AZ-08 Trent Franks (R) Trent Franks (R) AZ-09 Kyrsten Sinema (D) Kyrsten Sinema (D) Arkansas AR-01 Rick Crawford (R) Rick Crawford (R) AR-02 French Hill (R) French Hill (R) AR-03 Steve Womack (R) Steve Womack (R) AR-04 Bruce Westerman (R) Bruce Westerman (R) California CA-01 Doug LaMalfa (R) Doug LaMalfa (R) CA-02 Jared Huffman (D) Jared Huffman (D) CA-03 John Garamendi (D) John Garamendi (D) CA-04 Tom McClintock (R) Tom McClintock (R) CA-05 Mike Thompson (D) Mike Thompson (D) CA-06 Doris Matsui (D) Doris Matsui (D) CA-07 Ami Bera (D) Ami Bera (D) (undecided) CA-08 Paul Cook (R) Paul Cook (R) CA-09 Jerry McNerney (D) Jerry McNerney (D) CA-10 Jeff Denham (R) Jeff Denham (R) CA-11 Mark DeSaulnier (D) Mark DeSaulnier (D) CA-12 Nancy Pelosi (D) Nancy Pelosi (D) CA-13 Barbara Lee (D) Barbara Lee (D) CA-14 Jackie Speier (D) Jackie
  • Georgia: Individual State Report

    Georgia: Individual State Report

    ACA IMPLEMENTATION RESEARCH NETWORK GEORGIA: INDIVIDUAL STATE REPORT State-Level Field Network Study of the Implementation of the Affordable Care Act December 2015 Rockefeller Institute of Government State University of New York The Brookings Institution The Public Policy Research Arm of the Fels Institute of Government State University of New York University of Pennsylvania 411 State Street Albany, NY 12203-1003 (518) 443-5522 www.rockinst.org ACA Implementation Research Network Georgia: Individual State Report Field Research Associates Michael J. Rich, Professor of Political Science and Environmental Sciences, Emory University [email protected], (404) 727-7449 Michael J. Rich is professor of political science and environmental studies at Emory University. He is the author of Collaborative Governance for Urban Revitalization (with Robert Stoker) and Federal Policymaking and the Poor, and several publications on feder- alism and a variety of urban public policy topics, including community development, housing and homelessness, crime, and economic development. His current research focuses on community building, neighborhood revitalization, and local poverty reduc- tion strategies, particularly concerning issues relating to cross-sector collaboration and the revitalization of urban communities. He was the founding executive director of Emory’s Center for Community Partnerships and served in that role from 2000-15. Dr. Rich received his Ph.D. in political science from Northwestern University and has held research appointments at the Brookings Institution and the U.S. Department of Hous- ing and Urban Development. He previously taught at Brown University, where he served as director of the Policy Analysis Laboratory, and was the founding executive director of The Providence Plan, a collaborative city-state-university initiative to revi- talize the city of Providence and its neighborhoods.