Presentation Slides
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Genpact Looks to a New Era Beyond “General Electric's Provider”
A Horses for Sources Rapid Insight Genpact Looks to a New Era beyond “General Electric’s Provider” Mike Atwood, Horses for Sources Phil Fersht, Horses for Sources In its first industry analyst conference, leading business process outsourcing (BPO) provider Genpact emphasized its business, today, is much broader than supporting General Electric’s back office and primarily delivering finance and accounting (F&A) services. The global service provider surpassed the $1 billion revenue threshold, in 2008 and new opportunities and challenges have emerged to scale and diversify its growing services business. “Tiger” Tyagarajan (Chief Operating Officer) and Bob Pryor (Executive Vice President, responsible for sales, marketing and new business development globally) co-hosted on May 18-19 in Cambridge, MA what Genpact billed as its first analyst and advisor conference. The event was well attended by all the analyst firms and many of the consulting firms which regularly help clients hire BPO firms such as Genpact. The largest of the advisory firms present was EquaTerra, which currently advises on the lion’s share of the BPO business. All and all, it was a good first effort, and more open than many service provider events we have attended in the past. The headline message was that the majority of Genpact’s business is no longer with its former parent GE (currently about 40 percent). In fact, its GE business actually declined last year as a percentage of total revenues. Further, only about one third of its business is now in finance and accounting outsourcing (FAO). As demand in other areas grows, Genpact will continue to verticalize its offerings in areas such as back office processing for financial institutions and healthcare companies, in addition to developing its IT services, and knowledge process outsourcing (KPO))/analytics offerings. -
Cruising the Information Highway: Online Services and Electronic Mail for Physicians and Families John G
Technology Review Cruising the Information Highway: Online Services and Electronic Mail for Physicians and Families John G. Faughnan, MD; David J. Doukas, MD; Mark H. Ebell, MD; and Gary N. Fox, MD Minneapolis, Minnesota; Ann Arbor and Detroit, Michigan; and Toledo, Ohio Commercial online service providers, bulletin board ser indirectly through America Online or directly through vices, and the Internet make up the rapidly expanding specialized access providers. Today’s online services are “information highway.” Physicians and their families destined to evolve into a National Information Infra can use these services for professional and personal com structure that will change the way we work and play. munication, for recreation and commerce, and to obtain Key words. Computers; education; information services; reference information and computer software. Com m er communication; online systems; Internet. cial providers include America Online, CompuServe, GEnie, and MCIMail. Internet access can be obtained ( JFam Pract 1994; 39:365-371) During past year, there has been a deluge of articles information), computer-based communications, and en about the “information highway.” Although they have tertainment. Visionaries imagine this collection becoming included a great deal of exaggeration, there are some the marketplace and the workplace of the nation. In this services of real interest to physicians and their families. article we focus on the latter interpretation of the infor This paper, which is based on the personal experience mation highway. of clinicians who have played and worked with com There are practical medical and nonmedical reasons puter communications for the past several years, pre to explore the online world. America Online (AOL) is one sents the services of current interest, indicates where of the services described in detail. -
Downloads/Dec2018/Harpercollins, Oops
oops 20 Life Lessons from the Fiascoes That Shaped America MARTIN J. SMITH and PATRICK J. KIGER To William Leford Smith,M.J.S whose. dimming eyes still see the humor in almost everything To Beastboy P.and J.K his. momster Good judgment is usually the result of experience. And experience is frequently the result of bad judgment. —An attorney in a lawsuit involving Boston’s John Hancock Tower, after the skyscraper’s windows fell out Some said I couldn’t sing, but no one could say I didn’t sing. —Florence Foster Jenkins, widely recognized as the worst opera diva ever contents Introduction The Joy of Oops ix Lesson #1 READ THE FINE PRINT The Eroto- Utopians of Upstate New York John Humphrey Noyes’s sexually adventurous Perfectionist commune was one of the most successful utopian religious groups in 19th-century Amer- ica. Alas, the devil was in the details. { 1 } Lesson #2 ACCENTUATE THE POSITIVE How Thomas Edison Invented Trash Talk Why would one of America’s iconic inventors publicly electrocute a full- grown carnival elephant? The answer reveals a little- known story of ego, failure, and the moment when America began “going negative.” { 13 } Lesson #3 BEWARE SOLUTIONS THAT CREATE NEW PROBLEMS The Global Underarm Deodorant Disaster Thomas Midgley Jr. was among America’s greatest problem solvers. Unfor- tunately, his landmark “Eureka!” moments had an echo that sounded a lot like “Oops!” { 27 } CONTENTS v Lesson #4 BAD RESULTS TRUMP GOOD INTENTIONS Kudzu: A Most Tangled Tale What began as a well- intentioned effort to stop soil erosion in the American South became a dramatic example of what can happen when you mess with Mother Nature. -
War of the Currents
An Electric Battle A WebQuest for War of the Currents Introduction At the turn of the twentieth century, the War of the Currents had a clear winner—Tesla and his alternating current. However, direct current survived into the twenty-first century. As recently as 2007, some parts of Manhattan were finally converted to alternating current. The transition from direct current to alternating current begin in the late 1920s but took decades, in part, because the foundation of New York City’s energy grid was build by Edison’s company. Task Your task is to research the everyday devices credited to Edison and Tesla. You will compare these inventor’s influences by creating a script for a 5-min mock “debate” between Edison and Tesla in which they debate their influences on today’s and future technology. Process Use the resources listed in the Resources section to begin your research. The Web sites listed are good starting points, but further Internet research will be necessary. Record your answers to the following questions. 1. What was the relationship between Tesla and Edison prior to the War of the Currents? 2. Both Tesla and Edison were prolific inventors. If the two were competing to obtain the most number of patents filed, who wins and by what margin? 3. Did any of Tesla’s or Edison’s inventions build upon one another or work together to bring about new technology? 4. Could direct current make a comeback? Explain your answer. Write a Script Write a script for a 5-min mock debate between Edison and Tesla, in which each tries to convince the audience that he was the more influential inventor. -
War of Currents
War of Currents In the War of Currents era (sometimes, War of the Currents or Battle of Currents) in the late 1880s, George Westinghouse and Thomas Edison became adversaries due to Edison's promotion of direct current (DC) for electric power distribution over alternating current (AC). Edison's direct-current system generated and distributed electric power at the same voltage as used by the customer's lamps and motors. This meant that the current in transmission was relatively large, and so heavy conductors were required and transmission distances were limited, to about a mile (kilometre); otherwise transmission losses would make the system uneconomical. At the time, no method was practical for changing voltages of DC power. The invention of an efficient transformer allowed high voltage to be used for AC transmission. An AC generating plant could then serve customers at a great distance (tens to hundreds of miles), or could serve more customers within its economical transmission distance. The fewer much larger plants needed for AC would achieve an economy of scale that would lower costs further. The invention of a practical AC motor increased the usefulness of alternating current for powering machinery. Edison's company had invested heavily in DC technology and was vigorously defending its DC based patents. George Westinghouse saw AC as a way to get into the business with his own patented competing system and set up the Westinghouse Electric Company to design and build it. The Westinghouse company also purchased the patents for alternating current devices from inventors in Europe and licensed patents from Nikola Tesla. -
What Is REALLY Driving Digital Transformation EQUIPMENT LEASING and FINANCE ASSOCIATION Panel Members Moderator: John Deane CEO the Alta Group [email protected]
EQUIPMENT LEASING AND FINANCE ASSOCIATION What is REALLY Driving Digital Transformation EQUIPMENT LEASING AND FINANCE ASSOCIATION Panel Members Moderator: John Deane CEO The Alta Group [email protected] Presenters: Jim Ambrose Jeff Berg President, Equipment Finance EVP - North America GE Capital Healthcare Equipment Finance DLL [email protected] [email protected] Tiger Tyagarajan President & CEO Genpact [email protected] EQUIPMENT LEASING AND FINANCE ASSOCIATION Digitization: A definition “Digitization is the use of digital technologies to change a business model and provide new revenue and value- producing opportunities; it is the process of moving to a digital business.” Source: EQUIPMENT LEASING AND FINANCE ASSOCIATION Digitization of Marketing Timeline EQUIPMENT LEASING AND FINANCE ASSOCIATION Digitization Drivers: The 4 C’s Customers Costs Competition Compliance • Increased • Reduce cost to serve • New entrants • Know your expectations • Deliver process • New business customer • Less loyalty improvements models • Anti-money • Digital lifestyle • Drive agility and • Technology laundering flexibility players … • Anti-fraud Apple • Reduce headcount Google • Risk management and OpEx LinkedIn • Capital adequacy Facebook EQUIPMENT LEASING AND FINANCE ASSOCIATION Why Worry? Because if you don’t digitize … then someone else will EQUIPMENT LEASING AND FINANCE ASSOCIATION DLL Express Finance mobile application Financing at your fingertips Jeffrey Berg EVP - North America – DLL Financial Solutions Partner EQUIPMENT -
Edison Facts 2021.Indd
Edison Facts Did You Know? ■ Thomas Edison was born on February 11, 1847, in Milan, Ohio. ■ Edison was partially deaf. ■ At age 10, Edison built his first science laboratory in the basement of his family's home. ■ Edison acquired 1,093 U.S. patents for his inventions. He held the record for the most patents until 2015, when he was surpassed by inventor Lowell Wood, who today holds 1,969 U.S. patents. ■ The first invention that Edison tried to sell was an electric vote recorder. ■ The phonograph was Edison's favorite invention. ■ In 1879, Edison invented the first incandescent light bulb. ■ Edison tested over 6,000 vegetable growths (baywood, boxwood, hickory, cedar, flax, bamboo) as filament material in his light bulbs. ■ Edison set up the Pearl Street Central Power Station, the world's first “electric light-power station” in lower Manhattan. ■ Edison's Pearl Street plant powered one square mile of Lower Manhattan, providing service to 59 customers for approximately 24 cents per kilowatt-hour. ■ Edison founded the Edison General Electric Company in 1878 to market his inventions, including the incandescent lamp. In 1892, the company merged with the Thomson-Houston Company to form the General Electric Company. ■ Edison began operation of the first passenger electric railway in the country in Menlo Park, New Jersey. ■ Edison was nicknamed the “Wizard of Menlo Park”. ■ In 1913, Edison introduced the first talking motion pictures. ■ Edison coined the phrase, “Genius is one percent inspiration, 99 percent perspiration.” ■ Edison passed away when he was 84 years old, on Sunday, Learn more about October 18, 1931. -
The Last Days of Night
FEATURE CLE: THE LAST DAYS OF NIGHT CLE Credit: 1.0 Thursday, June 14, 2018 1:25 p.m. - 2:25 p.m. Heritage East and Center Lexington Convention Center Lexington, Kentucky A NOTE CONCERNING THE PROGRAM MATERIALS The materials included in this Kentucky Bar Association Continuing Legal Education handbook are intended to provide current and accurate information about the subject matter covered. No representation or warranty is made concerning the application of the legal or other principles discussed by the instructors to any specific fact situation, nor is any prediction made concerning how any particular judge or jury will interpret or apply such principles. The proper interpretation or application of the principles discussed is a matter for the considered judgment of the individual legal practitioner. The faculty and staff of this Kentucky Bar Association CLE program disclaim liability therefore. Attorneys using these materials, or information otherwise conveyed during the program, in dealing with a specific legal matter have a duty to research original and current sources of authority. Printed by: Evolution Creative Solutions 7107 Shona Drive Cincinnati, Ohio 45237 Kentucky Bar Association TABLE OF CONTENTS The Presenter .................................................................................................................. i The War of the Currents: Examining the History Behind The Last Days of Night .................................................................................................... 1 AC/DC: The Two Currents -
From Cyber-Utopia to Cyber-War. Advocacy Coalitions and the Normative Change in Cyberspace
From Cyber-Utopia to Cyber-War. Normative Change in Cyberspace. Dissertation zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades doctor philosophiae (Dr. phil.) vorgelegt dem Rat der Fakultät für Sozial- und Verhaltenswissenschaften der Friedrich- Schiller-Universität Jena von Matthias Schulze (M.A.) geboren am 28.03.1986 in Weimar 15.03.2017 1 Gutachter 1. Prof. Dr. Rafael Biermann (Friedrich-Schiller Universität Jena) 2. Dr. Myriam Dunn Cavelty (ETH Zürich) 3. Prof. Dr. Georg Ruhrmann (Friedrich-Schiller Universität Jena) Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 08.08.2017 2 Copyright © 2018 by Matthias Schulze. Some Rights reserved. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, PO Box 1866, Mountain View, CA 94042, USA. 3 Table of Contents Table of Contents 4 Acknowledgement 7 Abstract 10 List of Abbreviations 11 List of Tables and Graphics 13 1. Introduction 15 1.1 Puzzle & Research Question 18 1.2 Literature Review 22 1.3 Contributions of the Study 27 1.4 Case Selection: The United States 30 1.5 Structure and Logic of the Argument 32 2. Explaining Normative Change 38 2.1 Norms and Theories of Normative Change 39 2.1.1 Norm Diffusion and Norm Entrepreneurs 41 2.1.2 Critique of Deontological Norms 42 2.1.3 Critique of Diffusion Models 44 2.2 Paradigms and Norm-Change 47 2.2.1 Discursive Struggles between Paradigms 53 2.2.2 Framing 59 2.2.3 Degrees of Change 63 2.2.4 Explaining Change 67 -
General Electric Partners with Leading Investors to Transform Gecis, Its Global Business Processing Operation, Into an Independent Company
General Electric Partners With Leading Investors To Transform Gecis, its Global Business Processing Operation, into an Independent Company Move Will Enable Gecis to Pursue Global Demand for BPO Services Fairfield, Conn. (November 8, 2004) – General Electric today announced it has entered into a definitive agreement with two leading private-investment firms, General Atlantic Partners and Oak Hill Capital Partners, under which the firms will acquire a majority interest in GE Capital International Services (Gecis), GE’s global business- processing operation. Gecis already is one of the largest shared-service providers in the world, employing more than 17,000 professional staff. As a recapitalized, independent company, Gecis will be well positioned to offer its high-quality business-processing services to companies in the Americas, Europe, and Asia, where it already has operations. Gecis will continue to serve GE under a multiyear contract, and Pramod Bhasin will remain as president and chief executive officer, supported by the current Gecis global management team. Approximately 1,000 Gecis employees will remain with GE. The transaction, subject to customary approvals, values Gecis at $800 million. Upon closing, GE will retain a 40 percent stake in Gecis and receive cash proceeds of approximately $500 million, which it plans to use to fund growth initiatives. The parties aim to complete the transaction some time in the next six months. “This transaction allows us to offer our quality business-process services to an expanding roster of leading companies worldwide,” Bhasin said in making today’s announcement. “With accelerated growth, Gecis will provide expanded opportunities for employees and increased value for shareholders. -
Government Regulations of Shechita (Jewish Religious Slaughter) in the Twenty-First Century: Are They Ethical?
J Agric Environ Ethics (2012) 25:747–763 DOI 10.1007/s10806-011-9324-4 ARTICLES Government Regulations of Shechita (Jewish Religious Slaughter) in the Twenty-First Century: Are They Ethical? Ari Z. Zivotofsky Accepted: 1 July 2011 / Published online: 15 July 2011 Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011 Abstract Human beings have engaged in animal husbandry and have slaughtered animals for food for thousands of years. During the majority of that time most societies had no animal welfare regulations that governed the care or slaughter of animals. Judaism is a notable exception in that from its earliest days it has included such rules. Among the Jewish dietary laws is a prohibition to consume meat from an animal that dies in any manner other than through the rigorously defined method of slaughter known as shechita. In recent decades more and more attempts have been initiated by governments around the world to either outright ban or to control and modify the practice of shechita. This paper presents the requisite background about shechita and then analyzes the ethics of some of the recent legislation. The analysis includes a rebuttal of the assertion that shechita is an inhumane method of slaughter. It further presents the consequences on the Jewish community of legislation to impose pre-slaughter stunning and explains why such legislation is unethical. The actual effect of labeling laws is discussed and it is shown why such laws are also un- ethical. Keywords Animal welfare Á Ethics Á Government regulations Á Religious slaughter Á Shechita Introduction Human beings have historically maintained animals for food production, labor, and companionship. -
General Electric Company (“GE” Or “Respondent”)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 Release No. 10899 / December 9, 2020 SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Release No. 90620 / December 9, 2020 ACCOUNTING AND AUDITING ENFORCEMENT Release No. 4194 / December 9, 2020 ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING File No. 3-20165 ORDER INSTITUTING CEASE-AND- In the Matter of DESIST PROCEEDINGS, PURSUANT TO SECTION 8A OF THE SECURITIES ACT GENERAL ELECTRIC OF 1933 AND SECTION 21C OF THE COMPANY, SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, MAKING FINDINGS, AND IMPOSING Respondent. REMEDIAL SANCTIONS AND A CEASE- AND-DESIST ORDER I. The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) deems it appropriate that cease- and-desist proceedings be, and hereby are, instituted pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities Act”) and 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) against General Electric Company (“GE” or “Respondent”). II. In anticipation of the institution of these proceedings, Respondent has submitted an Offer of Settlement (the “Offer”) which the Commission has determined to accept. Solely for the purpose of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf of the Commission, or to which the Commission is a party, and without admitting or denying the findings herein, except as to the Commission’s jurisdiction over it and the subject matter of these proceedings, which are admitted, Respondent consents to the entry of this Order Instituting Cease- and-Desist Proceedings Pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Making Findings, and Imposing a Cease-and-Desist Order (“Order”), as set forth below.