The Center for Comparative Immigration Studies CCIS University of California, San Diego Population Politics: Benjamin Franklin and the Peopling of North America By Alan Houston University of California, San Diego Working Paper 88 December 2003 “Population Politics: Benjamin Franklin and the Peopling of North America” Alan Houston Department of Political Science University of California, San Diego La Jolla, CA 92093-0521
[email protected] ℡ 858/534-2951 Presented at the Center for Comparative Immigration Studies Research Seminar 2 December 2003 Draft Not for citation without permission “People are indeed the essential of commerce, and the more people the more trade; the more trade, the more money; the more money, the more strength; and the more strength, the greater the nation…All temporal felicities, I mean national, spring from the number of people.” Daniel Defoe Benjamin Franklin’s Observations Concerning the Increase of Mankind (1751) is a landmark in the history of modern demography, accurately predicting the relative and absolute rates of growth for Great Britain and North America into the middle of the nineteenth century. It is also a milestone in the history of immigration. Lamenting the “swarm” of German immigrants who threatened to make Pennsylvania “a Colony of Aliens,” Franklin called for policies designed to protect and increase the number of English settlers. These two dimensions of Franklin’s argument have been treated in relative isolation. Demographers have marveled at Franklin’s predictions, and identified the premise of his argument—that population grows up to, but cannot exceed, the limits of subsistence—as an important precursor to Malthus.1 Historians of immigration and ethnicity, by contrast, have condemned Franklin’s nativism, and assigned him an important role in the development of assimilationist and exclusionary policies in North America.2 There is a kernel of truth to each of these interpretations: Franklin was an 1 James H.