DOCSLIB.ORG

The Genomic History of Southeastern Europe

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Genomic History of Southeastern Europe The Genomic History of Southeastern Europe Supplementary Information Contents: Supplementary Note 1: Archaeological and osteological context of newly reported individuals (pages 1-49) Supplementary Note 2: Phenotypically informative markers in hunter-gatherer populations (pages 50-54) Supplementary Note 3: Admixture graph modeling of the relationship among Neolithic populations (pages 55-58) Supplementary Note 1: Archaeological and osteological context of newly reported individuals. This supplement provides archaeological details for individuals that have genome-wide ancient DNA data reported for the first time in this study. They are organized first by present- day country of origin, and then by site. We also provide a brief note describing the Danube Gorges region and approximate chronologies for the Balkan Peninsula and Ukraine. Austria ................................................................................................................... 3 Kleinhadersdorf Flur Marchleiten (2 individuals) ............................................................................... 3 Asparn (6 individuals) ...................................................................................................................................... 3 Bulgaria .................................................................................................................. 4 Beli Breyag (2 individuals) ............................................................................................................................. 4 Dzhulyunitsa (8 individuals) ......................................................................................................................... 4 Ivanovo (1 individual) ...................................................................................................................................... 6 Krepost (1 individual) ...................................................................................................................................... 6 Malak Preslavets (10 individuals) ............................................................................................................... 6 Mednikarovo (1 individual) ........................................................................................................................... 8 Merichleri – Kairyaka Necropolis (2 individuals) ................................................................................ 8 Ohoden (1 individual) ....................................................................................................................................... 9 Sabrano (1 individual) ...................................................................................................................................... 9 Samovodene (1 individual) ............................................................................................................................ 9 Smyadovo (6 individuals) ............................................................................................................................... 9 Sushina (3 individuals) ................................................................................................................................. 10 Varna I (5 individuals) ................................................................................................................................... 11 Yabalkovo (2 individuals) ............................................................................................................................ 13 Yunatsite (2 individuals) .............................................................................................................................. 14 Croatia ................................................................................................................. 15 Beli Manastir-Popova Zemlja (4 individuals) ...................................................................................... 15 Jazinka Cave (1 individual) .......................................................................................................................... 16 Kargadur (2 individuals) .............................................................................................................................. 16 Osijek (2 individuals) ..................................................................................................................................... 17 Radovanci (1 individual) .............................................................................................................................. 18 Vela Spila (1 individual) ................................................................................................................................ 18 Veliki Vanik (2 individuals) ......................................................................................................................... 18 Vučedol Tell (2 individuals) ........................................................................................................................ 19 Zemunica Cave (3 individuals) .................................................................................................................. 20 France .................................................................................................................. 20 Aven des Iboussières à Malataverne (2 individuals) ....................................................................... 20 Greece .................................................................................................................. 20 Diros, Alepotrypa Cave (4 individuals) .................................................................................................. 20 Franchthi Cave (1 sample) ........................................................................................................................... 21 Italy ...................................................................................................................... 21 Grotta d’Oriente (1 individual) .................................................................................................................. 21 Latvia ................................................................................................................... 22 Zvejnieki (17 individuals) ............................................................................................................................ 22 1 Macedonia ........................................................................................................... 24 Govrlevo (Cerje), Skopje (1 individual) ................................................................................................. 24 Poland .................................................................................................................. 25 Kierzkowo (8 individuals) ........................................................................................................................... 25 Romania ............................................................................................................... 26 Carcea (1 individual) ...................................................................................................................................... 26 Coțatcu (1 individual) .................................................................................................................................... 27 Măgura Buduiasca (Teleor 3) (1 individual) ....................................................................................... 27 Schela Cladovei (4 individuals) ................................................................................................................. 28 Ostrovul Corbului (3 individuals) ............................................................................................................. 28 Urziceni (2 individuals) ................................................................................................................................ 29 Serbia ................................................................................................................... 30 Gomolava (3 individuals) ............................................................................................................................. 30 Hajdučka Vodenica (6 individuals) .......................................................................................................... 31 Lepenski Vir (4 individuals) ........................................................................................................................ 31 Padina (13 individuals) ................................................................................................................................. 33 Saraorci-Jezava (1 individual) .................................................................................................................... 35 Vlasac (17 individuals) .................................................................................................................................. 35 Ukraine ................................................................................................................ 37 Alexandria (1 individual) ............................................................................................................................. 37 Dereivka I (21 individuals) .......................................................................................................................... 37 Ilyatka (3 indviduals) ....................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Between West and East People of the Globular Amphora Culture in Eastern Europe: 2950-2350 Bc
    BETWEEN WEST AND EAST PEOPLE OF THE GLOBULAR AMPHORA CULTURE IN EASTERN EUROPE: 2950-2350 BC Marzena Szmyt V O L U M E 8 • 2010 BALTIC-PONTIC STUDIES 61-809 Poznań (Poland) Św. Marcin 78 Tel. (061) 8536709 ext. 147, Fax (061) 8533373 EDITOR Aleksander Kośko EDITORIAL COMMITEE Sophia S. Berezanskaya (Kiev), Aleksandra Cofta-Broniewska (Poznań), Mikhail Charniauski (Minsk), Lucyna Domańska (Łódź), Viktor I. Klochko (Kiev), Jan Machnik (Kraków), Valentin V. Otroshchenko (Kiev), Petro Tolochko (Kiev) SECRETARY Marzena Szmyt Second Edition ADAM MICKIEWICZ UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE OF EASTERN STUDIES INSTITUTE OF PREHISTORY Poznań 2010 ISBN 83-86094-07-9 (print:1999) ISBN 978-83-86094-15-8 (CD-ROM) ISSN 1231-0344 BETWEEN WEST AND EAST PEOPLE OF THE GLOBULAR AMPHORA CULTURE IN EASTERN EUROPE: 2950-2350 BC Marzena Szmyt Translated by John Comber and Piotr T. Żebrowski V O L U M E 8 • 2010 c Copyright by B-PS and Author All rights reserved Cover Design: Eugeniusz Skorwider Linguistic consultation: John Comber Prepared in Poland Computer typeset by PSO Sp. z o.o. w Poznaniu CONTENTS Editor’s Foreword5 Introduction7 I SPACE. Settlement of the Globular Amphora Culture on the Territory of Eastern Europe 16 I.1 Classification of sources . 16 I.2 Characteristics of complexes of Globular Amphora culture traits . 18 I.2.1 Complexes of class I . 18 I.2.2 Complexes of class II . 34 I.3 Range of complexes of Globular Amphora culture traits . 36 I.4 Spatial distinction between complexes of Globular Amphora culture traits. The eastern group and its indicators . 42 I.5 Spatial relations of the eastern and centralGlobular Amphora culture groups .
    [Show full text]
  • A Research Program on Innovations in Prehistory and Antiquity?
    Special Volume 6 (2016): Space and Knowledge. Topoi Research Group Articles, ed. by Gerd Graßhoff and Michael Meyer, pp. 777–818. Svend Hansen – Jürgen Renn – Florian Klimscha – Jochen Büttner – Barbara Helwing – Sebastian Kruse The Digital Atlas of Innovations: A Research Program on Innovations in Prehistory and Antiquity Edited by Gerd Graßhoff and Michael Meyer, Excellence Cluster Topoi, Berlin eTopoi ISSN 2192-2608 http://journal.topoi.org Except where otherwise noted, content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 Svend Hansen – Jürgen Renn – Florian Klimscha – Jochen Büttner – Barbara Helwing – Sebastian Kruse The Digital Atlas of Innovations: A Research Program on Innovations in Prehistory and Antiquity The authors discuss the simultaneous appearance of technological innovations in three key technologies (metallurgy, wheeled vehicles, weighing systems) in the second half of the 4th millennium. This is done from a source-critical perspective because the innova- tions are discussed with the help of dynamic maps from the Topoi project Digital Atlas of Innovations. Besides indications of diffusion gradients influenced by special research conditions, exceptional waves of innovation can be detected for all three technologies in the discussed period. These waves of innovation cannot, however, be generalized but have to be understood on the basis of the respective technology traditions and lines of devel- opment specific to local areas. Monocentric diffusion theories can be clearly disproven, local technology developments and their converging in certain centrally situated regions have to be assumed instead. Similarly, the transfer of objects and their châine opératoire can only be detected rather infrequently, while the adaptation to local socio-economic and environmental factors can be demonstrated.
    [Show full text]
  • Pottery Technology As a Revealer of Cultural And
    Pottery technology as a revealer of cultural and symbolic shifts: Funerary and ritual practices in the Sion ‘Petit-Chasseur’ megalithic necropolis (3100–1600 BC, Western Switzerland) Eve Derenne, Vincent Ard, Marie Besse To cite this version: Eve Derenne, Vincent Ard, Marie Besse. Pottery technology as a revealer of cultural and symbolic shifts: Funerary and ritual practices in the Sion ‘Petit-Chasseur’ megalithic necropolis (3100–1600 BC, Western Switzerland). Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, Elsevier, 2020, 58, pp.101170. 10.1016/j.jaa.2020.101170. hal-03051558 HAL Id: hal-03051558 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03051558 Submitted on 10 Dec 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 58 (2020) 101170 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Anthropological Archaeology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jaa Pottery technology as a revealer of cultural and symbolic shifts: Funerary and ritual practices in the Sion ‘Petit-Chasseur’ megalithic necropolis T (3100–1600 BC,
    [Show full text]
  • Lepenski Vir - the Prehistoric Energy Efficient Architecture
    Articles Lepenski Vir - the prehistoric energy efficient architecture (The paper is an outline of the presentation at the Danube ASHRAE Chapter Meeting in Timisoara, Romania, 15th April 2016) The prehistoric settlement of Lepenski Vir, which was discovered during the 1960s in Djerdap Gorge on the Serbian side of the Danube River, is well-known for its unusual NENAD B. MILORADOVIĆ architecture and preserved house floors. If B.Mech.Sc, engineer for heat distribution we analyze this architecture in view of the PUC Beogradske elektrane, Belgrade, Serbia set of natural (meteorological, geographical, [email protected] astronomical and vegetal) environmental properties and consider energy consump- questions with place of urban planning and structure tion for heating and air-conditioning needs designing in connection with elements of climate. The for such dwellings, i.e. achieving thermal questions as follows: comfort in those houses, we can conclude that the builders paid particular attention 1. Which is the optimum location and orientation for to energy efficiency in building stock while a building (if any choice is possible)? designing those houses. Remains of the 2. Which are favourable and unfavourable climatic architecture of the prehistoric settlement elements; how can they be adapted to the building of Lepenski Vir, where operations for en- in an optimum manner and vice versa? ergy efficiency improvements are visible 3. How is it possible to improve the microclimate and recognizable, are the remains of an around and inside the building? energy effective architecture. Their houses were energy efficient considering their age, Those questions are in the book about bioclimatic technology and given location, contributing architecture, written by Serbian architect Mila Pucar.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Early and Middle Bronze Age in the Balkans Arthur Bankoff
    1 The Early and Middle Bronze Age in the Balkans Arthur Bankoff The earlier part of the Bronze Age in temperate southeastern Europe (c. 2200– 1500 B.C.) presents a confusing picture to the unwary archaeologist. Although over the years more publications have appeared in English, German, and French, many basic site reports and syntheses are only fully available in Hungarian, Romanian, Bulgarian, Serbian, or other indigenous languages. Often the names of apparently identical archaeological cultures change with bewildering abandon as one crosses modern national borders or even moves between regions of the same country. This part of the world has a history (beginning in the mid–nineteenth century) of antiquarian collecting and detailed specialist typological studies, especially of ceramics and metal objects, with far less effort expended on the more mundane aspects of prehistoric life. Only since the 1980s have studies become available that incorporate the analysis of plant and animal material from Bronze Age sites, and these are far from the rule. To some extent, this is due to the nature of the archaeological record, that is, the sites and material that have survived from the Early and Middle Bronze Age. With the exception of habitation mounds (tells) and burial mounds (tumuli), both of which have a limited distribution in the earlier part of the Bronze Age, most sites are shallow, close to the modern ground surface, and easily disturbed. Farming and urban development has been more destructive to these sites than to the more deeply buried sites of earlier periods. The typically more dispersed settlement pattern of the Bronze Age in most of this region results in smaller sites, more vulnerable to the vagaries of history than the more concentrated nucleated sites of the later Neolithic or Eneolithic (sometimes called Copper Age) of the fifth and fourth millennia B.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Carda Florida , Backa Palanka
    Telenet Hotels Network | Serbia Carda Florida, Backa Palanka Media Center Backa Palanka Phone: +38164 5558581; +38161 6154768; www.booking-hotels.biz [email protected] Carda Florida, Backa Palanka Dunavska carda Florida je objekat koji se nalazi na 1. 293 kilometru leve obale velike evropske reke. Udaljena je nepun kilometar od magistralnog puta Backa Palanka - Novi Sad, a sam grad Backa Palanka i drzavna granica sa Republikom Hrvatskom su na razdaljini od 4 kilometra. Raspolaze sa 240 mesta za goste, uz veliku mogucnost prosirenja kapaciteta. Ugostiteljska ponuda je orijentisana iskljucivo na riblje specijalitete, uz sluzenje kvalitetnih vina sa fruskogorskog vingorja. Poseduje 3 bungalova po 2 kreveta. Ukupan broj lezajeva je 6. Backa Palanka Serbia page 1 / 9 Backa Palanka is situated on the bank of the river Danube in the southwest of Backa, 40 kilometres far away from Novi Sad. It is located by a relative busy regional road that goes along the south of Backa, from Novi Sad to Ilok.The river Danube is the greatest gift of nature to Backa Palanka. There is the lake Tikvara that stretches on 500 ha. The complex Tikvara that offers different sports, recreation and entertaining contents is built next to the lake. On the territory of the community there is a great number of archaeological, ethnological and cultural monuments among which the most important are the archaeological locality near Celarevo, the so-called "Avarian necropola" and the old house in Nestin, a pearl of Serbian architecture from the first half of the XVIII century. The Castle of Dundjerski, a masterpiece of former glamour, is also situated in Celarevo.
    [Show full text]
  • Catholics & Cremation
    Interim Signature Solution Interim Signature Solution (continued from previous panel) Answers in glory and our bodies and souls will be reunited Cremation(continued from previous panel) Ad resurgendum to your Answers but will be remade on that last day, sharing the in glory and our bodies andcum souls Christo will be reunited Cremation Ad resurgendum Glory of the Risen Christ. in the but will be remade on that last day, sharing the cum Christo to your Because of this, it is inconsistent with this belief Glory of the Risen Christ. in the questions… The rules that govern cremation after death for Catholic To Rise to scatter the cremated remains of our deceased Because of this, it is inconsistent with this belief To Rise the Catholic Church are actually not changing! questions… The rules that govern cremation after death for With Christ Catholic (into the air, on the ground, or in bodies of water) Church to scatter the cremated remains of our deceased Since 1963 the Church has allowed cremation the Catholic Church are actually not changing! or to divide them, or to keep them in homes. (into the air, on the ground, or in bodies of water) Church With Christ and since early 1997 it has allowed a funeral Since 1963 the Church has allowed cremation or to divide them, or to keep them in homes. liturgy in the presence of cremated remains. and since early 1997 it has allowed a funeral Recently, the Vatican’s Congregation for the Why are they The Instruction notes that “when, for legitimate Even with these options, the Church has always What should be liturgy in the presence of cremated remains.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham E-Theses
    Durham E-Theses Neolithic and chalcolithic cultures in Turkish Thrace Erdogu, Burcin How to cite: Erdogu, Burcin (2001) Neolithic and chalcolithic cultures in Turkish Thrace, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/3994/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk NEOLITHIC AND CHALCOLITHIC CULTURES IN TURKISH THRACE Burcin Erdogu Thesis Submitted for Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be published without his prior written consent and information derived from it should be acknowledged. University of Durham Department of Archaeology 2001 Burcin Erdogu PhD Thesis NeoHthic and ChalcoHthic Cultures in Turkish Thrace ABSTRACT The subject of this thesis are the NeoHthic and ChalcoHthic cultures in Turkish Thrace. Turkish Thrace acts as a land bridge between the Balkans and Anatolia.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphology of Modern Arrowhead Tips on Human Skin Analog*
    J Forensic Sci, January 2018, Vol. 63, No. 1 doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.13502 PAPER Available online at: onlinelibrary.wiley.com PATHOLOGY/BIOLOGY LokMan Sung,1,2 M.D.; Kilak Kesha,3 M.D.; Jeffrey Hudson,4,5 M.D.; Kelly Root,1 and Leigh Hlavaty,1,2 M.D. Morphology of Modern Arrowhead Tips on Human Skin Analog* ABSTRACT: Archery has experienced a recent resurgence in participation and has seen increases in archery range attendance and in chil- dren and young adults seeking archery lessons. Popular literature and movies prominently feature protagonists well versed in this form of weap- onry. Periodic homicide cases in the United States involving bows are reported, and despite this and the current interest in the field, there are no manuscripts published on a large series of arrow wounds. This experiment utilizes a broad selection of modern arrowheads to create wounds for comparison. While general appearances mimicked the arrowhead shape, details such as the presence of abrasions were greatly influenced by the design of the arrowhead tip. Additionally, in the absence of projectiles or available history, arrowhead injuries can mimic other instruments causing penetrating wounds. A published resource on arrowhead injuries would allow differentiation of causes of injury by forensic scientists. KEYWORDS: forensic science, forensic pathology, compound bow, arrow, broadhead, morphology Archery, defined as the art, practice, and skill of shooting arrows While investigations into the penetrating ability of arrows with a bow, is indelibly entwined in human history. Accounts of have been published (5), this article is the first large-scale study the bow and arrow can be chronicled throughout human civiliza- evaluating the cutaneous morphology of modern broadhead tion from its origins as a primary hunting tool, migration to utiliza- arrow tip injuries in a controlled environment.
    [Show full text]
  • The Importance of Protected Natural Areas
    http://proceedings.lumenpublishing.com/ojs/index.php/lumenproceedings International Conference « Global interferences of knowledge society », November 16-17th, 2018, Targoviste, Romania Global Interferences of Knowledge Society The Importance of Protected Natural Areas Constantin POPESCU, Maria-Luiza HRESTIC https://doi.org/10.18662/lumproc.137 How to cite: Popescu, C., & Hrestic, M.-L. (2019). The Importance of Protected Natural Areas. In M. Negreponti Delivanis (ed.), International Conference «Global interferences of knowledge society», November 16-17th, 2018, Targoviste, Romania (pp. 201-212). Iasi, Romania: LUMEN Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.18662/lumproc.137 © The Authors, LUMEN Conference Center & LUMEN Proceedings. Selection and peer-review under responsibility of the Organizing Committee of the conference International Conference « Global interferences of knowledge society », November 16-17th, 2018, Targoviste, Romania The Importance of Protected Natural Areas Constantin POPESCU1, Maria-Luiza HRESTIC2* Abstract Economic relationships lead to the determination of behavior towards resources, including those related to biodiversity. Economic relationships lead to the determination of behavior towards resources, including those related to biodiversity. Human interventions are not negative only by making maximum use of biological resources, but also through activities that do not directly target these categories. The main ways humans contribute to the degradation of biodiversity are: modification and destruction of habitats, voluntary and involuntary transfer of species, overexploitation in all areas, starting with resources. The purpose of this research is to highlight the importance of protected areas in the world, as well as in Romania, highlighting economic activities that help to preserve and protect nature and the natural environment, activities that are included in management plans for sustainable development.
    [Show full text]
  • Štýřice III (Koněvova St. Or Vídeňská St.) – an Epigravettian Site in Brno (Czech Republic)
    Volume V ● Issue 1/2014 ● Pages 7–18 INTERDISCIPLINARIA ARCHAEOLOGICA NATURAL SCIENCES IN ARCHAEOLOGY homepage: http://www.iansa.eu V/1/2014 Štýřice III (Koněvova St. or Vídeňská St.) – an Epigravettian Site in Brno (Czech Republic) Zdeňka Nerudováa*, Petr Nerudaa aAnthropos Institute, Moravian Museum, Zelný trh 6, Brno 659 37, Czech Republic ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT: Article history: The paper summarises the results of Palaeolithic research in Vídeňská (former Koněvova) Street in the Received: 1 August 2014 city of Brno. After the first small-scale excavations carried by K. Valoch in 1972, primarily rescue ex- Accepted: 16 September 2014 cavations in recent years (2009–2014) have revealed the extent and intensity of the Palaeolithic settle- ment. The specific features of the locality are represented by imported raw materials, a high frequency Key words: of burins compared to other tools and a predominance of Mammuthus primigenius among the faunal Moravia remains. The settlement was earlier classified as Epigravettian which is confirmed by new radiocarbon Svratka River dating. Based on the knowledge obtained in the immediate neighbourhood of the locality, it became Epigravettian apparent that this convenient area near the river repeatedly attracted people to build settlements in these subsistence strategies places, in all probability specialised groups of hunters. Despite the climatically unfavourable final part of the LGT period (after a definition by Markova et al. 2013), within which the settlement at Brno- -Štýřice III falls based on radiocarbon dating and malacofauna, we can take into consideration a denser settlement strategy than is usually assumed in the broader context of the Middle Danube Region.
    [Show full text]
  • VA Form 40-1330, Claim for Standard Government Headstone Or Marker
    GENERAL INFORMATION SHEET CLAIM FOR STANDARD GOVERNMENT HEADSTONE OR MARKER RESPONDENT BURDEN - Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 15 minutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. VA cannot conduct or sponsor a collection of information unless it has a valid OMB number. Your response (per OMB guidance) is voluntary, however, your response is required to obtain benefits. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden to the VA Clearance Officer (005R1B), 810 Vermont Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20420. Please DO NOT send claims for benefits to this address. PRIVACY ACT - VA considers the responses you submit confidential (38 U.S.C. 5701). VA may only disclose this information outside the VA if the disclosure is authorized under the Privacy Act, including the routine uses identified in the VA system of records, 48VA40B, published in the Federal Register. VA considers the requested information relevant and necessary to determine maximum benefits under the law. BENEFIT PROVIDED a. BURIAL HEADSTONE OR MARKER Only for Veterans who died on or after November 1, 1990 - Furnished for the grave of any eligible deceased Veteran and provided for placement in private and local government cemeteries regardless of whether or not the grave is marked with a privately-purchased headstone or marker. Only for Veterans who died before November 1, 1990 - Furnished for the UNMARKED GRAVE of any eligible deceased Veteran.
    [Show full text]