DOCSLIB.ORG

Regenerative Construction and Operation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

COST Action CA16114 RESTORE: REthinking Sustainability TOwards a Regenerative Economy, Working Group Three Publication: REGENERATIVE CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION Regenerative Construction and Operation Bridging the gap between design and construction, following a Life Cycle Approach consisting of practical approaches for procurement, construction, Regenerative Construction operation and future life. This publication is the summary of COST Action RESTORE Working Group Three activities and and Operation investigates the implementation in the building sector of the theoretical regenerative concepts and the Bridging the gap between design and construction, design approaches developed by the Working Groups One and Two. following a Life Cycle Approach consisting of The main question Working Group Three faced, is how a building can be built, operated and maintained in a regenerative manner. Barriers can undercut a paradigm shift from the “business as practical approaches for procurement, construction, usual” to a regenerative economy, making the realisation of regenerative projects diffi cult. The need operation and future life. for robust strategies to guide a transition from traditional construction process towards one which Regenerative Construction and Operation incorporates regenerative values is very clear. This publication collates the thoughts developed by the participants of Working Group Three, EDITORS investigating and proposing robust approaches helping the paradigm shift, from the procurement and Giulia Peretti, Carsten K. Druhmann construction to the operation and maintenance phases, considering also Future Life concepts. COST Action CA16114 RESTORE: REthinking Sustainability TOwards a Regenerative Economy Working Group Three Report: Regenerative Construction and Operation Funded by the Horizon 2020 Framework Programme ISBN 978-3-9504607-4-2 (Online) of the European Union ISBN 978-3-9504607-5-9 (Print) Cover: Adobe Stock/photo 5000 IMPRESSUM RESTORE Working Group Three Report: Regenerative Construction and Operation RESTORE WG3 Leader Giulia Peretti (Werner Sobek WSGreenTechnologies) RESTORE WG3 Vice Leader Carsten K. Druhmann (Institute of Facility Management - ZHAW) WG3 Subgroup Leaders Martin Brown (Fairsnape) Blerta Vula (Kolegji UBT) Suvi Nenonen (Tampere University of Technology) Indra Purs (University of Latvia) ISBN 978-3-9504607-4-2 (Online) ISBN 978-3-9504607-5-9 (Print) Copyright RESTORE Working Group Three COST Action CA16114 RESTORE: REthinking Sustainability TOwards a Regenerative Economy Project Acronym RESTORE Project Name REthinking Sustainability TOwards a Regenerative Economy COST Action CA16114 Action Chair Carlo BATTISTI (Eurac Research) Vice Action Chair Martin BROWN (Fairsnape) Scientifi c Representative Roberto LOLLINI (Eurac Research) Grant Holder Manager Gloria PEASSO (Eurac Research) STSM Manager Michael BURNARD (University of Primorska) Training School Manager Dorin BEU (Romania Green Building Council) Communication Manager Daniel FRIEDRICH (Duale Hochschule Baden Württemberg Mosbach) Grant Holder institution EURAC Research Institute for Renewable Energy Viale Druso 1, Bolzano 39100, Italy t +39 0471 055 611 Project Duration 2017 – 2021 Website www.eurestore.eu COST Website www.cost.eu/COST_Actions/ca/CA16114 Graphic design Esperia Srl - Eurac Proofreading/Editing Martin BROWN (Fairsnape) Citation: Peretti, G., Druhmann, C. K., S., Bleiziffer, J., Brown, M., Campama Pizarro, R., del Río Merino, M., Gremmelspacher, J., Kontovourkis, O., Nenonen, S., Purs, I., Villoria Sáez, P., Vula Rizvanolli, B. (Eds.), (2019). Regenerative CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION. COST Action CA16114 RESTORE, Working Group Three Report: REGENERATIVE CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION. Editors, authors and COST offi ce are not responsible for the external websites referred to in this publication. This publication is based upon work from COST Action RESTORE CA16114, supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology). COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology) is a pan-European intergovernmental framework. Its mission is to enable break-through scientifi c and technological developments leading to new concepts and products and thereby contribute to strengthening Europe’s research and innovation capacities. It allows researchers, engineers and scholars to jointly develop their own ideas and take new initiatives across all fi elds of scienceand technology, while promoting multi- and interdisciplinary approaches. COST aims at fostering a better integration of less research intensive countries to the knowledge hubs of the European Research Area. The COST Association, an International not-for-profi t Association under Belgian Law, integrates all management, govern- ing and administrative functions necessary for the operation of the framework. The COST Association has currently 36 Member Countries. www.cost.eu COST is supported by the EU Framework Programme Horizon 2020 COST Action CA16114 RESTORE: REthinking Sustainability TOwards a Regenerative Economy, Working Group Three Report: REGENERATIVE CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION Regenerative construction and operation Bridging the gap between design and construction following a Life Cycle Approach consisting of practical approaches for procurement, construction, use & operation and future life EDITORS Giulia Peretti, Carsten K. Druhmann 01 02 REGENERATIVE CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION WORKING GROUP THREE / PARTICIPANTS AND CONTRIBUTORS PUBLICATION CONTRIBUTORS EDITORS Giulia Peretti, D Carsten K. Druhmann, CH SUB GROUP EDITORS AND AUTHORS Jelena Bleiziffer, HRV Martin Brown, UK Rafael Campama Pizarro, ESP Mercedes del Río Merino, ESP Odysseas Kontovourkis, CYP Jonas Manuel Gremmelspacher, D Suvi Nenonen, FIN Indra Purs, LVA Paola Villoria Sáez, ESP Blerta Vula Rizvanolli, RKS SUB GROUP CONTRIBUTORS AND CO-AUTHORS PROCUREMENT Clarice Bleil de Souza, UK Miljan Mikic, SVN CONSTRUCTION Daniel Friedrich, D Aranzazu Galán Gonzále, BEL Themistoklis Tsalkatidis, NOR OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE Vaturi Asher, ISR Ari-Pekka Lassila, FIN FUTURE LIFE Martin Brown, UK Giulia Peretti. D Stylianos Yiatros, CYP WORKING GROUP THREE PARTICIPANTS PROCUREMENT Martin Brown, Miljan Mikic, Clarice Bleil de Souza CONSTRUCTION Mercedes del Río Merino, Evangelos Efthymiou, Aránzazu Galán González, Kiril Gramatikov, Odysseas Kontovourkis, Villoria Paola Saez, Iztok Šušteršič, Themistoklis Tsalkatidis, Blerta Vula OPERATION Dorin Beu, Jelena Bleiziffer, Ari-Pekka Lassila, Suvi Nenonen, Asher Vaturi, Stelios Yiatros FUTURE LIFE Paola Boarin, Oget Nevin Cocen, Emanuela Giancola, Emanuele Naboni, Serena Piselli, Indra Purs, Zwi Weinstein TRAINING SCHOOL PARTICIPANTS Amit Anafi, Rafael Campama, Manuel de Borja Torrejon, Marco Delli Paoli, Jonas Gremmelspacher, Elena Gualandi, Louise Hamot, Pedro Humbert, Tudor Iuga, Cristina Jiménez-Pulido, Katarzyna Kalinowska-Wichrowska, Adrian Krezlik, Virna Moneró Flores, Denisa Petrus, Carolina Piña, Marta Sabater Forteza-Rey, Nevena Simic, Anastasia Stella, Alejandra Vidales, Zvi Weinstein WORKING GROUP THREE / PARTICIPANTS AND CONTRIBUTORS 03 04 REGENERATIVE CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION CONTENT 1. INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................7 Giulia Peretti, Werner Sobek WSGreenTechnologies, Stuttgart/Germany Carsten K. Druhmann, ZHAW, Zurich/Switzerland 2. DEFINITIONS ....................................................................................................... 19 Collective authorship 3. PROCUREMENT ................................................................................................... 29 Martin Brown Fairsnape, Lancashire/UK 4. CONSTRUCTION .................................................................................................. 59 Paola Villoria Sáez, Universidad Politecnica de Madrid/Spain Odysseas Kontovourkis, University of Cyprus, Nikosia/Cyprus Blerta Vula Rizvanolli, Kolegji UBT, Pristina/Kosovo Mercedes Del Río Merino, University Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid/Spain 5. USE & OPERATION .............................................................................................. 89 Suvi Nenonen, Tampere University Of Technology, Tampere/Finland Jelena Bleiziffer, University Of Zagreb, Zagreb/Croatia 6. FUTURE LIFE ......................................................................................................117 Indra Purs, University of Latvia 7. SUSTAINABLE REGENERATIVE TOOL – SRT (TRAINING SCHOOL WG3) .................. 139 Rafael Campama Pizarro, Lund University, Sweden Jonas Manuel Gremmelspacher, Lund University, Sweden 8. PEOPLE ............................................................................................................ 155 CONTENT 05 06 REGENERATIVE CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION 1. INTRODUCTION AUTHORS Giulia Peretti Werner Sobek WSGreenTechnologies, Stuttgart/Germany Carsten K. Druhmann Institute of Facility Management - ZHAW, Zurich/Switzerland INTRODUCTION 07 08 REGENERATIVE CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 10 1.1 Life cycle approach .......................................................................................... 11 1.2 Restore context - continuity from wg1 and wg2 ........................................................ 11 1.3 Working group 3 organisation & activities ............................................................... 12 1.4 Dissemination .................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • BEYOND SUSTAINABILITY THROUGH REGENERATIVE ARCHITECTURE Regenerative Urban Landscapes

    BEYOND SUSTAINABILITY THROUGH REGENERATIVE ARCHITECTURE Regenerative Urban Landscapes

    BEYOND SUSTAINABILITY THROUGH REGENERATIVE ARCHITECTURE Regenerative Urban Landscapes SAM NEMATI Thesis Report Master of Fine Arts in Architecture and Urban Design Year 5 Studio 12 Tutors: Alejandro Haiek, Carl-Johan Vesterlund, Andrew Bellfild, Tom Dobson Spring 2020 Umeå School of Architecture Umeå University 4640 Words Sam Nemati Thesis Report Spring 2020 Contents Table of Figures ............................................................................................................................................ 2 Abstract ........................................................................................................................................................ 3 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 4 Methodology ................................................................................................................................................ 5 CHAPTER 1: Beyond sustainability through regenerative architecture ..................................................... 6 1. Climate Change and Regenerative Architecture ................................................................................... 6 2. Regenerative Architecture in Practice .................................................................................................. 7 2.1. Case Study: Playa Viva, Mexico (2009) .............................................................................................. 8 3. Regenerative
  • Putting Regenerative Development Into Action: Understanding the Decision Making Process of a 680 Hectare Regenerative Project

    Putting Regenerative Development Into Action: Understanding the Decision Making Process of a 680 Hectare Regenerative Project

    World Sustainable Built Environment Conference 2017 Hong Kong Track 10: Place-making & Community Empowerment Putting Regenerative Development into Action: Understanding the Decision Making Process of a 680 Hectare Regenerative Project Dominique HESa, André STEPHANb, Sareh MOOSAVIc a The University of Melbourne, Australia, [email protected] b The University of Melbourne, Australia, [email protected] c The University of Melbourne, Australia, [email protected] ABSTRACT The built environment is responsible for significant environmental impacts. It is therefore a central research area to balance ecological and built systems and allow them both to thrive. While the majority of previous and existing attempts have targeted minimising environmental impacts, regenerative development goes beyond reduction and aims to restore and support environmental, social and economic flows. Yet, very few projects to date have been able to demonstrate a regenerative outcome. This is because few consulting firms currently offer regenerative design thinking, which is in turn linked to a lack of understanding of processes that support decision making in regenerative development projects. This paper uses a 680 hectares regenerative development project in Gippsland, South East Australia as a case study to investigate how implementing a regenerative development approach from the onset affects the decision-making process. A series of workshops were facilitated by the authors with the local community, indigenous elders, design experts, academics, scientists, government and industry partners and other stakeholders. An online survey consisting of 10 questions was sent to the 40 actors involved and 28 responses were collected (N = 28 and a response rate of 70%). This study provides a contribution to the understanding of both the processes that can support the implementation of innovative regenerative concepts in the built environment and their benefits.
  • Connecting the Regenerative Food System to Mission-Aligned Services and Sources of Capital

    Connecting the Regenerative Food System to Mission-Aligned Services and Sources of Capital

    Connecting the regenerative food system to mission-aligned services and sources of capital. 2020 DIRECTORY MID-YEAR UPDATE INDEX Consulting & Services Investment & Financial Services Agroforestry Management LLC . 16 Agro Fund One, Limited . 6 Caspian Farming . 16 Ecosystem Services Market Consortium . 10 Common Threads Consulting . 16 Foodshed Capital . 10 Dalberg Advisors . 16 Grounded Capital Partners . 10 Danielle “Dani” Kusner, CCA . 16 Impact Ag Partners . 7 Edible-Alpha . 16 Iroquois Valley Farmland REIT . 10 Farm Forward . 17 Malaika Maphalala - Natural Food System 6 (FS6) . 17 Investments, LLC . 10 Glynwood Center for Regional Organic & Regenerative Investment Food & Farming . 14 Cooperative (ORICOOP) . 2, 3 Grounded Growth, LLC . 17 Paine Schwartz Partners . 4, 5 Guidelight Strategies . 17 Provenance Capital Group (PCG) . 10 Mercaris . 15 SLM Partners . 8 Propagate Ventures . 17 Transformation LLC . 9 Regenerative Design Group . 18 ValuesAligned Capital . 11 Regenerative Poultry Systems . 12, 13 Regenerative Resources Company . 18 Investors, Foundations & Regen Network . 18 Funders Terra Genesis Internationa . 18 Argosy Foundation . 27 Vayda . 18 World Tree . 18 Real Estate Nature Towns . 27 Farm Inputs & Technology AgLaunch . 24 Research/Education/Advocacy Ag Solutions Network, Inc . 24 Acres U .S .A . 30 Biome Makers . 24 Biodynamic Association . 34 Cargill . 24 Croatan Institute . 34 Haystack Ag . 21 E2, Environmental Entrepreneurs . 34 Marrone Bio Innovations . 19, 20 Great Plains Regeneration . 34 Primary BioAg Innovations & Global Regenerative Food Systems Investment . 31 BioAg Linkages . 24 Regenerative Rising . 34 Soil Works LLC . 22 Rodale Institute . 32 Sound Agriculture . 23 Soil Health Institute . 28, 29 The Redmelon Company . 24 The Land Institute . 33 White Buffalo Land Trust . 34 Farms & Ranches Ciasnocha Family Farms .
  • Regenerative Architecture: a Pathway Beyond Sustainability Jacob A

    Regenerative Architecture: a Pathway Beyond Sustainability Jacob A

    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 2009 Regenerative Architecture: A Pathway Beyond Sustainability Jacob A. Littman University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses Part of the Environmental Design Commons, and the Other Architecture Commons Littman, Jacob A., "Regenerative Architecture: A Pathway Beyond Sustainability" (2009). Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014. 303. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses/303 This thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. REGENERATIVE ARCHITECTURE: A PATHWAY BEYOND SUSTAINABILITY A Thesis Presented by Jacob Alexander Littman Submitted to the Department of Art, Architecture and Art History of the University of Massachusetts in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARCHITECTURE May 2009 Architecture + Design Program Department of Art, Architecture and Art History REGENERATIVE ARCHITECTURE: A PATHWAY BEYOND SUSTAINABILITY A Thesis Presented by Jacob Alexander Littman Approved as to style and content by: ____________________________ Skender Luarasi, Chairperson ____________________________ Ray K. Mann, Member ____________________________ Thom Long, Member ____________________________________ William Oedel, Department Head Department of Art, Architecture and Art History ABSTRACT REGENERATIVE ARCHITECTURE: A PATHWAY BEYOND SUSTAINABILITY MAY, 2009 JACOB LITTMAN, B.A., UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST M.A., UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST Directed by: Professor Skender Luarasi The current paradigm in the field of architecture today is one of degeneration and obsolete building technologies. Regenerative architecture is the practice of engaging the natural world as the medium for, and generator of the architecture.
  • Regenerative System Design: Application in the Georgia

    Regenerative System Design: Application in the Georgia

    REGENERATIVE SYSTEM DESIGN: APPLICATION IN THE GEORGIA PIEDMONT by ANDREW KILINSKI (Under the Direction of Jon Calabria) ABSTRACT In the southeast, our built environment will benefit from the productive and functional ecological systems needed to address impacts on natural systems to support forthcoming population growth, energy, and food production demands. Through precedent study analysis, interpretation, and current regenerative rating systems evaluation, regenerative design principles are applied to a ten-acre urban site in Athens, Georgia, to show how a systems-based design can restore ecological function within the built environment, while meeting energy and food production demands. The design application reveals the components critical to regenerative design, and illustrates how they are applied to a conceptual site design; it may also be utilized as a template for laypersons, landscape architects, or other design professionals interested in regenerative design for urban areas in the built environment. INDEX WORDS: net-positive, permaculture, regenerative design, regenerative development, resilience, sustainability REGENERATIVE SYSTEM DESIGN: APPLICATION IN THE GEORGIA PIEDMONT by ANDREW KILINSKI BLA, UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA, 2000 MLA, UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA, 2015 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ATHENS, GEORGIA 2015 © 2015 Andrew Kilinski All Rights Reserved REGENERATIVE SYSTEM DESIGN: APPLICATION IN THE GEORGIA PIEDMONT by ANDREW KILINSKI Major Professor: Jon Calabria Committee: Robert Alfred Vick Thomas Lawrence Kerry Blind Electronic Version Approved: Suzanne Barbour Dean of the Graduate School The University of Georgia August 2015 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my family, friends, and co-workers for their support.
  • Sustainability, Restorative to Regenerative.­ COST Action CA16114 RESTORE, Working Group One Report: Restorative Sustainability

    Sustainability, Restorative to Regenerative.­ COST Action CA16114 RESTORE, Working Group One Report: Restorative Sustainability

    COST Action CA16114 RESTORE: REthinking Sustainability TOwards a Regenerative Economy, Working Group One Report: Restorative Sustainability Sustainability, Restorative to Regenerative An exploration in progressing a paradigm shift in built environment thinking, from sustainability to restora tive sustainability and on to regenerative sustainability EDITORS Martin Brown, Edeltraud Haselsteiner, Diana Apró, Diana Kopeva, Egla Luca, Katri-Liisa Pulkkinen and Blerta Vula Rizvanolli COST is supported by the EU Framework Programme Horizon 2020 IMPRESSUM RESTORE Working Group One Report: Restorative Sustainability RESTORE WG1 Leader Martin BROWN (Fairsnape) Edeltraud HASELSTEINER (URBANITY) RESTORE WG1 Subgroup Leader Diana Apró (Building), Diana Kopeva (Economy), Egla Luca (Heritage), Katri-Liisa Pulkkinen (Social), Blerta Vula Rizvanolli (Social) ISBN ISBN 978-3-9504607-0-4 (Online) ISBN 978-3-9504607-1-1 (Print) urbanity – architecture, art, culture and communication, Vienna, 2018 Copyright: RESTORE Working Group One COST Action CA16114 RESTORE: REthinking Sustainability TOwards a Regenerative Economy Project Acronym RESTORE Project Name REthinking Sustainability TOwards a Regenerative Economy COST Action n. CA16114 Action Chair Carlo BATTISTI (Eurac Research) Vice Action Chair Martin BROWN (Fairsnape) Scientific Representative Roberto LOLLINI (Eurac Research) Grant Manager Gloria PEASSO (Eurac Research) STSM Manager Michael BURNARD (University of Primorska) Training School Coordinator Dorin BEU (Romania Green Building Council) Science Communication Officer Bartosz ZAJACZKOWSKI (Wroclaw University of Science and Technology) Grant Holder institution EURAC Research Institute for Renewable Energy Viale Druso 1, Bolzano 39100, Italy t +39 0471 055 611 f +39 0471 055 699 Project Duration 2017 – 2021 Website www.eurestore.eu COST Website www.cost.eu/COST_Actions/ca/CA16114 Graphic design Ingeburg Hausmann (Vienna) Citation: Brown, M., Haselsteiner, E., Apró, D., Kopeva, D., Luca, E., Pulkkinen, K., Vula Rizvanolli, B., (Eds.), (2018).
  • Towards Regenerative Architecture: Material Effectiveness

    Towards Regenerative Architecture: Material Effectiveness

    International Journal of Technology 11(4) 722-731 (2020) Received November 2018 / Revised January 2019 / Accepted July 2020 International Journal of Technology http://ijtech.eng.ui.ac.id Towards Regenerative Architecture: Material Effectiveness Salahaddin Yasin Baper1*, Mahmood Khayat1, Lana Hasan1 1Architectural Engineering Department, Salahaddin University –Erbil, Zanko Street, Kirkuk Road, Erbil City, Kurdistan Region, Iraq, 44002 Abstract. Environmental problems were initiated with the rise of human civilization, and they increased with the rise in technology’s contribution to human lives. Researchers in the field of architecture believe that regenerative approaches are systems based on aligning architectural design with natural resources to provide positive outcomes. Regenerative design holds significant promise for a new theory of sustainable architecture. The aim of this paper is to provide a theoretical framework for the concept of regenerative architecture and testing materials’ effectiveness (thermal, availability, waste, and toxicity) and impacts on shifting towards regenerative architecture. Materials’ thermal properties were examined by determining energy consumption through Ecotect as a simulation program. However, other factors were measured by a checklist derived from an intense review of the literature. The results revealed that the existing current buildings in Erbil City do not lie in the regenerative zone. Moreover, the study also shows that material selection plays a significant role in reducing energy consumption and toxicity levels that result from moving architectural design towards regenerative design. Keywords: Architectural design concepts; Ecotect; Material effectiveness; Regenerative architecture 1. Introduction Regenerative architecture (which goes beyond the scope of sustainable design) is considered the highest architectural design concept in terms of positive productivity towards the environment, while sustainability aims at being neutral, which mean less harm to nature and the environment.
  • Title Join the Scrum! Regenerative Environmental Design for Autism

    Title Join the Scrum! Regenerative Environmental Design for Autism

    Title Join the Scrum! Regenerative Environmental Design for Autism Summary Host a Design Charette to inform a class project with students from Architecture, Interior Design, and Historic Preservation. The project will repurpose existing buildings into homes for adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). Invited guests and stakeholders will include adults with ASD and their families, non‐profit and government housing providers, civic leaders, and local architecture firms. Students will be able to engage with stakeholders to produce designs that meet their needs. Duration 2/28/2019 ‐ 2/28/2019 Amount requested $4999.7799999999997 Primary Applicant Julie Irish Interior Design Fiscal Officer Amanda Youngquist College of Design Collaborators Andrea Wheeler Architecture Diane Al Shihabi Interior Design/Preservation & Cultural Heritage Mikesch Muecke Architecture/Preservation & Cultural Heritage Nora Ladjahasan Institute for Design Research and Outreach Eric Olson Apparel, Events, and Hospitality Office check notes Follow up info IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY – OFFICE OF DIVERSITY AND INCLUSION INCLUSIVE INITIATIVES GRANT 2019 1) Narrative Title of initiative Join the Scrum! Regenerative Environmental Design for Autism Overview In Fall 2018 a collaborative team was awarded the College of Design BNIM Regenerative Grant ($9,500). The grant recognized the need to provide suitable homes for young adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). After a young adult leaves fulltime education there are few housing options that meet their unique needs. With around 1:59 children being diagnosed with ASD, this is a problem being faced by increasing numbers of young adults and their families. Coupled with this is the need to preserve and protect existing resources in our world, particularly in relation to sustainability and regenerative architecture.
  • Beyond Green: Changing Context - Changing Expectations

    Beyond Green: Changing Context - Changing Expectations

    Chapter 1: Keynote Lectures Beyond Green: Changing Context - Changing Expectations Raymond J. Cole University of British Columbia, Canada ABSTRACT: This paper explores the changing context, expectations and priorities that directly and indirectly affect building environmental progress Whereas the current focus is on "green" design - reducing or mitigating the environmental consequences of buildings - the future concerns will embrace mitigation, adaptation to the new conditions and re- storing previous adversely impacted regions and human settlements. The paper looks be- yond current ideas of green building to the emerging notion of Regenerative design. The pri- mary objective of the paper is to identify which dictates of Regenerative design could constructively reframe performance assessment tools. 1 INTRODUCTION Green building practices have become increasingly commonplace over the past decade, in part due to the introduction and widespread use of green building rating systems. While an important initial step, simply producing buildings that are incrementally better than current practice will prove insufficient to meet the requirements of a built environment that can support sustainable patterns of living. Within the context of climate change and rapid urban development, greater performance leaps will be necessary and at a faster rate. This will challenge many existing norms and expectations and, in particular, redefine how we conceive the design, construction and operation of buildings. Whereas the current focus is on "green" design - reducing or mitigating the environmental consequences of buildings - the future concerns will embrace mitigation, adaptation to the new conditions and restoring previous adversely impacted regions and human settlements. “Regenerative” design is emerging as perhaps the most comprehensive basis for rethinking the role of building as a catalyst that positively supports the co-evolution of human and natural systems.
  • Beyond Sustainability – Biophilic and Regenerative Design in Architecture

    Beyond Sustainability – Biophilic and Regenerative Design in Architecture

    European Scientific Journal March 2015 /SPECIAL/ edition ISSN: 1857 – 7881 (Print) e - ISSN 1857- 7431 BEYOND SUSTAINABILITY – BIOPHILIC AND REGENERATIVE DESIGN IN ARCHITECTURE Bruno Duarte Dias, MA Lusíada University, CITAD, Portugal Abstract The environment friendly design movement emerges from the clear view that human conventional action is destroying the living systems that support life on earth as we know it. This review paper underlines the limits of Sustainable concept and looks at Biophilia and Regenerative Design, two emerging concepts that appear to have a more appropriate answer to the environmental problems that we face today and in the future. This paper will give an overview of each concept and design framework, trying to interpret the way they operate, the differences, similarities and goals. Keywords: Ecological design, Sustainable design, Biophilic design, Regenerative design Introduction The foundations for the environment friendly design movement (ecodesign) starts to lay down in the US on the late 60’s, but was in the 70’s with the oil crises and books like “Silent Spring” and “The Limits to Growth” that the subjects like bioclimatic design and efficiency start to be developed. From the ecodesign design emerged two branches. The “Ecological Design”, that is define by Sim Van der Ryn and Stuart Cowan as any form of design that minimizes environmentally destructive impacts by integrating itself with living processes that is based in understanding the natural process and take benefit from them. The second design branch focus on low-impact environment and high efficiency solutions based on the use of technology. These are the main subjects on Green and Sustainable Design.
  • From #Boycottfashion to #Lovedclotheslast

    From #Boycottfashion to #Lovedclotheslast

    From #BoycottFashion To #LovedClothesLast Understanding the Impact of the Sustainable Activist Consumer and How Activist Movements are Shaping a Circular Fashion Industry Hilary Jade Ip Final Fashion Management Project sustainable noun able to be maintained at a certain rate or level activist noun a person who campaigns to bring about political or social change consumer noun a person who purchases goods and services for personal use. FINAL FASHION MANAGEMENT PROJECT WORD COUNT: 7050 STUDENT ID: 29483816 This report has been printed on 100% recycled paper CONTENTS 7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8 INTRODUCTION 10 METHODOLOGY 12 CHAPTER 1: FASHION ACTIVISM 25 CHAPTER 2: THE ACTIVIST CONSUMER 32 CHAPTER 3: THE CURRENT INDUSTRY RESPONSE 44 CHAPTER 4: THE CIRCULAR ECONOMY 50 CHAPTER 5: RECOMMENDATION 58 CHAPTER 6: POST COVID-19 64 CONCLUSION 67 APPENDIX 76 BIBLIOGRAPHY 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report provides an investigative analysis of the ‘sustainable’ activist consumer and how activist movements have pushed the fashion industry towards a more circular future. Chapter 1 of the report analyses the fashion activism and its current forms in the digital age. It examines the impact of activist movements focusing on disrupting fashion consumption. Chapter 2 of the report dissects the Generation Z (Gen Z) activist consumer. Gen Z stands to become one of the most influential consumer “The Fashion Industry is groups and is leading the current industry shift. Chapter 3 of the report explores the response of fashion industry, examining notable examples from across the fashion hierarchy and the Broken” potential issues with their strategies. - Chapter 4 of the report introduces the Circular Economy model, a radical Clare Farrell, change option for brands to improve their Corporate Social Responsibility that is not the Triple Bottom Line.
  • Regenerative Development As an Integrative Paradigm and Methodology for Landscape Sustainability

    Regenerative Development As an Integrative Paradigm and Methodology for Landscape Sustainability

    sustainability Article Regenerative Development as an Integrative Paradigm and Methodology for Landscape Sustainability Leah V. Gibbons 1,*, Scott A. Cloutier 2 ID , Paul J. Coseo 3 and Ahmed Barakat 1 1 School of Sustainability, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA; [email protected] 2 School of Sustainability, Julie Ann Wrigley Global Institute of Sustainability, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA; [email protected] 3 The Design School, Herberger Institute for Design and the Arts, Julie Ann Wrigley Global Institute of Sustainability, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 1 April 2018; Accepted: 5 June 2018; Published: 7 June 2018 Abstract: Although the integration of sustainability, ecology, and design has been recognized as necessary by scientists and practitioners, most transdisciplinary frameworks are not inclusive of the worldviews, paradigms, aims, processes, and components necessary for sustainability. Landscape sustainability science helps to focus scientist, scholar, practitioner, and stakeholder efforts toward sustainability at a pivotal level; however, collaboration and progress have been slow. Significant potential exists for design to be an integrative and transformational methodology toward landscape sustainability, yet it has not fulfilled this ambitious role. In this paper, we first build a case for regenerative development, a development and design methodology based on an ecological worldview, as an integrative platform for a new paradigm. This new paradigm, which we call regenerative landscape development, has the potential to thoroughly catalyze a shift toward regenerative sustainability. We then detail this new paradigm as a process that could continually enhance the capacities of living systems to increase health, well-being, and happiness.