<<

Simply conceiving the Arrhenius law and absolute kinetic constants using the geometric distribution

Denis Michel

Universite de Rennes1-IRSET. Campus de Beaulieu Bat. 13. 35042 Rennes cedex. [email protected]

Although first-order rate constants are mately from a strong initial impulsion spreading basic ingredients of physical chemistry, in the universe. Dynamic modeling of all molec- biochemistry and systems modeling, their ular systems, from enzymology to systems biol- innermost nature is derived from com- ogy, is grounded on the generalized use of kinetic plex physical chemistry mechanisms. The rates, usually written ”k” in traditional biochem- present study suggests that equivalent istry. Molecular events cover a wide range of conclusions can be more straightly ob- phenomena including motion, covalent modifica- tained from simple statistics. The dif- tions or interactions. Although they are associ- ferent facets of kinetic constants are first ated to all these events, kinetic rates are subtle classified and clarified with respect to time enough. Their physical meaning is generally ig- and energy and the equivalences between nored by biochemists, who need only using the fa- traditional flux rate and modern proba- mous equation of Arrhenius [1] as a general rela- bilistic modeling are summarized. Then, tionship for the temperature dependence of rates a naive but rigorous approach is proposed of reaction. According to this equation, derived to concretely perceive how the Arrhenius from the thermodynamic study of van’t Hoff [2], law naturally emerges from the geometric the logarithm of the rate constant is negatively distribution. It appears that (1) the dis- proportional to the inverse of temperature. Be- tribution in time of chemical events as well side this macroscopic thermodynamic approach, as (2) their mean frequency, are both dic- microscopic rate theories have then been devel- tated by randomness only and as such, are oped, for example based on the probability of accurately described by time-based and occurrence of a theory [3] or the spatial exponential processes respectively. diffusion out of an energy well [4]. For complete reviews on the subject, see [5, 6, 7]. Very atom- Keywords: Arrhenius law; Rate constant; istic models will not be considered here but the Bose-Einstein distribution; Geometric law. simplified version of the transition state theory most widespread in biochemistry textbooks will be shown to suffer from several drawbacks. The arXiv:1307.4583v2 [physics.data-an] 19 Dec 2013 present study is aimed at recovering formally the Arrhenius law and establishing a simple defini- 1 Introduction tion of kinetic constants, expurgated from mech- anistic considerations, using minimalist hypothe- Over zero kelvin, matter particles move, collide ses and simple statistical tools. and react with a certain probability. All these events result from a transfer of energy provided by either radiation or previous motions and ulti-

1 2 Modeling the events nonlinear mechanisms responsible for the refined behaviors of living systems [9]. The basic condi- 2.1 The classical ”mass action” ap- tion necessary to understand molecular events is proach to molecular events. that they occur randomly, that is to say without The very founder definition of chemical tran- memory. If a given event is memoryless and has sitions is based on rate fluxes, which are as- a mean waiting time hT i, then, the only possible sumed to be proportional to the amounts of law governing its probability of occurrence is the transformable reactants. In this view, which long exponential distribution. At every time point t, proved very efficient, the constants k are coeffi- this probability is simply cients of proportionality whose dimensions allow t − hT i to equalize the units in kinetic equations (time−1 P (X > t) = e (2a) for first order reactions, or M−1time−1 for second − t order reactions). For example, the elementary P (X ≤ t) = 1 − e hT i (2b) transition S →k P can be modeled as follows This result can be easily demonstrated. The d[S] − = k[S] (1a) absence of memory can be explicitly transcribed dt or into d[S] ∀t , t ∈ = −kdt (1b) 1 2 R+ [S] P (X > t + t ∩ X > t ) = P (X > t ) (3) yielding after integration, 1 2 1 2

[S]t Indeed, P (X > t1 + t2|X > t1) = ln = −k(t − t0) (1c) [S]0 P (X > t1 + t2 ∩ X > t1)/P (X > t1) = P (X > or t1 + t2)/P (X > t1) −kt [S]t = [S]0e (1d) Reciprocally, Hence, Eq.(3) becomes −kt [P ]t = [S]0 − [S]t = [S]0(1 − e ) (1e) P (X > t1 + t2) = P (X > t1)P (X > t2) (4a) The probabilistic view described below can be anticipated from this classical mass action ap- This relationship imposes to handle t as an proach if identifying the proportions of molecules exponent, such that with probabilities, but the probabilistic view can be introduced even more straightly. e−k(t1+t2) = e−kt1 e−kt2 (4b)

2.2 Minimalist mathematical ap- proaches more suitable for single in which k is introduced to cancel the dimen- events in biochemistry sion of the exponent and turns to correspond to a frequency (time−1) and the average transition A living cell is not a dish as those used in chem- time is Z ∞ 1 istry labs, because certain subcellular compart- hT i = kt e−ktdt = (5) ments contain very few macromolecules of the t=0 k same kind. For example, the notion of concen- tration is obviously meaningless for a gene from 2.3 The ergodic correspondence the X chromosome, present in a single copy in The recent outset of single molecule-based per- each cell. To circumvent this problem, the single spectives, particularly in biochemistry, radically molecule mathematical approach is preferable, il- changed the traditional concepts of chemistry luminating for understanding biochemical mech- (Table 1). anisms [8], and now widely used for modeling the 2 Table 1: Correspondences between the traditional bulk approach of chemistry and single molecule- based perspective Mass action approach Single molecule approach Concentration State probability Rate flux Poisson parameter Total concentration of the leading macromolecule 1 (so that Vmax = kcat in enzymology) Space Time

Of particular interest is the replacement of space (in which the concentration of reactants is defined), by time. This switch is fundamen- tally rooted in the principle of ergodicity, ac- cording to which the collection of states taken at a single time by an infinite number of parti- cles, corresponds to those taken by a single par- ticle during an infinite time window. Experi- Fig.1. The traditional energy barrier responsible for mental studies suggest that this assumption is reaction delays. acceptable, as illustrated by the single activity monitored in [10]. At equilibrium, the It is intriguing that when using this reasoning, classical Michaelis-Menten fraction of occupied the elementary rate k to be defined, is now re- ‡ macromolecules can be defined as well as a frac- placed by 3 such rates (k1, k−1 and k2). The S tional occupation time of a single macromolecule intermediate is considered as short-lived. Ma- [11]. Although the principle of ergodicity is gen- nipulating rates as parameters of exponential erally presented as a non-demonstrated axiom, functions implies that the global transition from the identical results obtained from the mass ac- S to P takes the form k = k1k2/(k−1 + k2). New tion (section 2.1) and mathematical (section 2.2) hypotheses should be introduced to simplify this approaches allow to understand its basis. value 1st hypothesis, k2 >> k−1. Once gener- ated, S‡ rapidly converts into P because of the 3 Modeling the frequencies of absence of energetic barrier between S‡ and P. the events One haves k = k1 so that the definition of k is simply replaced by that of k1, no way solving the 3.1 Inconsistensies in the classical de- initial question: what is a k? scription of the transition state 2d hypothesis, k2 << k−1. This is the theory hypothesis classically retained in the theory. In this case, k = k2(k1/k−1), or ‡ The version of the transition state theory most k = k2K . Now, the rate constant is defined by widespread in textbooks suffers from several an equilibrium (as initially proposed by Arrhe- drawbacks. Transitions from a starting point S nius himself, between normal and hypothetical to a final point P are supposed to follow a certain reaction-prone molecules). delay because they are restricted by an energy barrier. The transition is conditioned by prelim- ‡ ∆E‡ ‡ [S ] − inary passage through an unstable reaction in- K = = e kB T (6) [S0] termediate named activated complex and usually written with a double-dagger label ‡. The result- from which the Arrhenius law can be recov- ing two-step reaction is represented in Fig.1. ered

3 black beads represent the separations between − Ea k = A e kB T (7) the particles. Adjacent white beads clustered be- tween two black beads correspond to the number In this expression, the mysterious constant of energy quanta (written ε) in a single particle. ”A”, corresponding to a constant of integration If the beads added to the string are drawn ran- in the thermodynamic approach, is called ”pre- domly from a bag containing a huge number of exponential coefficient” and is extremely impor- well-mixed black and white pearls (equivalent to tant since it gives to k the dimension of a rate a drawing with replacement), then the probabil- (time−1) [12]. In the present description, it cor- ity that any given bead on the string is white is responds to k . According to physical principles, 2 W/(W + B). Hence, the probability that an ar- this rate (written below k‡) includes an universal bitrarily chosen stretch of white beads contains component k T/h time−1, corresponding to the B more than ε‡ beads is mean vibrational or translational energy (kBT ) where T is the temperature and k is Boltz- ‡ B  W ε mann’s constant, divided by Planck’s constant h. P (ε > ε‡) = (8) −23 B + W With kB = 1.38 10 J/K, T = 300 K and h = −34 12 6.63 10 J.s, one obtains kBT/h = 6.25 10 /s, that can be rewritten, if defining the ratio of which is very high indeed, but renders absurd the energy over particles W/B = hεi, initial hypothesis k2 << k−1. ‡ ‡  hεi ε 3d hypothesis, k2 = k−1 = k . In prin- P (ε > ε‡) = (9) ciple, k‡ is expected to be similar for the two 1 + hεi ‡ barrier-free transitions starting from S , and in For hεi and ε‡ large and of the same order of the present case for the backward transition k−1, magnitude and using the property of the expo- such that nential function  xn lim 1 + = ex (10) n→∞ n Eq.(9) approaches ‡ ‡ ‡ Then, k = k1k /(k + k ) = k1/2, letting un- ‡ − ε changed the initial question. In conclusion, we P (ε > ε‡) ∼ e hεi (11) see that this widespread description of rate con- stants in textbooks is clearly not satisfying. An This exponential result is naturally expected alternative simple view of statistical distribution for large numbers of beads. Indeed, given that of energy can be proposed. the probability that any given bead on the string is black is B/(W + B), then, when starting from 3.2 The geometric approach to energy a black bead and walking along the string, the distribution for systems capable of number of beads to be examined to find the fol- lowing black one is, on average, the reciprocal of unlimitedly storing energy the previous value (W +B)/B. As a consequence, Consider a closed system in which every parti- the average number of white beads in each inter- cle can store energy under different forms (ro- val is [(W + B)/B] − 1 = W/B, which is the tational, vibrational or translational) which all previously defined entity hεi, or mean number of correspond to interchangeable energy quanta. If energy quanta per particle. When switching to a given number of energy quanta distribute ran- a spatially continuous perspective by considering domly over a given number of particles, then the a large pearl necklace with infinitesimally small system can be compared to a very large pearl beads, ε is the length of a white segment. Given necklace made of two kinds of pearls: B black the randomness of bead sequence, the probabil- and W white pearls. The white beads are sup- ity that a segment is longer than ε‡ necessarily posed to correspond to energy quanta and the follows an exponential distribution such that

4 ‡ − ε P (ε > ε‡) = e hεi (12)

According to this probability, the kinetic rate would be simply

‡ − ε k = k‡e hεi (13) Fig.2. Probability distribution of particles with en- It is of course tempting to connect this result ergy ε‡, when increasing the mean energy per particle to Boltzmann by identifying hεi with the mean hεi (that is to say the temperature). energy per particle. This exponential function should not be confused with the one defined in and given that section 2.2, in which the unidimensional intensity ∞ was conceived along time, whereas it is now spec- X − j  − 1 −1 ified along the energy content. Consequently, the e hεi = 1 − e hεi (17) probability that an event occurs at every time j=0 point is an exponential of exponential one obtains

ε‡ ‡ − − ε e hεi −k‡t.e hεi ‡ P (X > t) = e (14) P (ε = ε ) ∼ j (18) P∞ − hεi j=0 e This simple building of the Arrhenius law is which is similar to the celebrated formula of in fact related to the Bose-Einstein distribution, Boltzmann, obtained using the entropy maximiz- assuming that energy quanta are inherently im- ing procedure and which predicts that the prob- material, permutable between the particles and ability that any particle has an amount of energy indefinitely superposable in a single particle. Ac- Ei is cording to the exponential relaxation observed n for many phenomena, this distribution is known −βEi X −βEj P (Ei) = e / e (19) to approach the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution j=0 at high temperature. Indeed, the probability where β = 1/k T and the denominator is that a white stretch contains precisely ε‡ beads B the canonical partition function summed over follows a geometric law plus 1, such that the the n possible microstates [13]. Hence, there is (ε‡ + 1)th bead to be drawn should be black. more than an analogy between the Boltzmann Hence, and geometric treatments for the infinitesimal

‡ probabilities of large systems. For small sys-  hεi ε 1 P (ε = ε‡) = (15) tems, the simple geometric plus 1 law of Eq.(15) 1 + hεi 1 + hεi is preferable. The value of the rate constant of Eq.(13) obtained using the simple necklace toy illustrated in Fig.2 and whose maxima are model, is also very similar to the transition-state precisely obtained when hεi = ε‡. This simple rate derived from a Hamiltonian, described for probability distribution indeed approaches the example in [5]. Boltzmann’s one when ε is large enough. Eq.(15) can be converted into its continuous version Most real systems are made of mixtures of molecules of different kinds, that can eventually ‡ − ε  − 1  convert into each-others, but also continuously P (ε = ε‡) ∼ e hεi 1 − e hεi (16) exchange their energy quanta. These generalized

5 exchanges have large-scale energy buffering ef- 4.2 Efflux of particles from an ener- fects allowing the mean energy per type of parti- getically isolated node cle to remain roughly constant, regardless of the If, in addition to particle arrivals, the import and size of the considered subpopulation. This point export of pure energy between the node and its is important to understand that the definition of environment are also precluded, then, the efflux rate constant proposed above remains true for rate obviously decreases with time since energy transient fluxes in isothermal environments. quanta accompany escaped particles. Moreover, energy quanta are expected to disappear faster than particles since only the most energy-rich particles are filtered by the threshold ε‡ for fly- 4 Transient fluxes ing away. Interestingly, the drop in total energy resulting from the evasion of the first particles The above developments hold in equilibrium con- can prevent the remaining particles to obtain ditions, when the proportions of particles of the their own travelling passport, rendering them same kind remain constant. This situation was definitely prisoners in absence of energy refuel- well described by Lewis [14] who compared the ing. A good illustration of this situation is the different populations of molecules to the habi- rate of evaporation of water molecules from a hot tants of different towns. Although people are soup. Ordinary experience shows that evapora- constantly moving between different towns, the tion decreases as the soup cools. For modeling relative town sizes are metastable and remain this, let us transform the total number of en- roughly constant in equilibrium. But imagine ergy quanta in the soup by a continuous variable now that a given node is pulled out from the x(t) decreasing with time and the total number network, such that the departures of molecules of particles by a continuous variable y(t) also are no longer compensated by arrivals: Is it pos- decreasing with time. Let us suppose that the sible to determine the exit rate in this situation? medium is not sticky to allow the particles to ‡ Different cases will be examined, under the as- clear off once their energy content reaches ε . sumption that the exchanges of energy quanta Then, the efflux rate derived from the geomet- in the residual population of particles are more ric distribution depends on the evolution of x(t) rapid than the escape of particles. and y(t) and obey the following system

‡  x(t) ε k(t) = k‡ (20a) y(t) + x(t) 4.1 Particle efflux in isothermal con- with ditions x˙(t) = ε‡y˙(t) (20b) and This is the realistic situation holding for transient y˙(t) = −k(t)y(t) (20c) phenomena in living cells, in which the overall amount of energy quanta over all molecular com- The fate of this system (Fig.3), depends on ponents roughly remains constant. Under this the relative values of the reaction threshold ε‡ condition, although the arrival of new particles and of the starting amounts x0 and y0. If y0 ≤ is precluded, the mean energy per resident parti- ‡ x0/ε , then all the particles disappear, but if cle hεi remains constant, owing to collisions with ‡ y(t0) > x0/ε , then a fraction of the initial pop- other types of components. In this case, the node ‡ ulation of particles (y0 − x0/ε ) remains stable, is expected to lose all its components with the such that rate defined in Eq.(13), in the same manner that all boiling water disappears from a ban that is  hεi  y = y 1 − 0 (21) constantly heated. ∞ 0 ε‡

6 It is amusing, but of course not necessary, clear that stirring the soup accelerates its cooling to recourse to Bose-Einstein to conceive that the by allowing the molecules whose energy content escape of the highest energy water molecules in is sufficient, to fly away instead of unnecessarily the form of vapor, can rapidly cool a bowl of hot accumulating more energy. soup without significantly reducing its volume, in line with the right panel of Fig.3. It is also

Figure 3. Transient escape of energy (red lines) and particles (dark blue lines) from an energetically-isolated subsystem. This unstable system can lose all its components or not, depending on the ratio between the initial ‡ ‡ mean energy per particle and the threshold transition energy. Curves drawn to Eq.(20) using (k , ε , x0, y0) = (6, 5, 40, 8) and (6, 8, 40, 20) for the left and right panel respectively.

5 Discussion in time of chemical events, as well as the ener- getic threshold over which they occur, are both It is suggested here that the geometric distri- fundamentally related to the exponential law, bution is a simple substitute to traditional ap- that is itself, together with its discrete counter- proaches to easily conceive the Arrhenius law, part the geometric law, the exact formulation of without need for the accessory tools of statisti- randomness. cal mechanics such as the Stirling approximation and Lagrange multipliers and without recourse Ackowledgement The author thanks Jean- to the particular mechanisms currently used in Christophe Breton and Benjamin Boutin for rate theories, including collision, diffusion or S- helpful discussions. matrix theories. The fact that equivalent result- ing behaviors are more directly obtained through conveniently selected statistical approaches is not References a surprise. Boltzmann long proved that statisti- [1] S. Arrhenius, Ober die reacktions- cal and enumerating strategies are shortcuts to geschwindigkeit bei der inversion von rohrzucker recover previous physical results. Moreover, the durch sauren. Z. Physik. Chem. 4 (1889) 226- quest for simplicity does not forbid rigor, accord- 248. ing to the pragmatic recommendation of Josiah Willard Gibbs: ”One of the principal objects of [2] J.H. Van’t Hoff, Etudes de Dynamique Chim- ique (Studies in Chemical Dynamics). Amster- theoretical research in any department of knowl- dam: (1884) F. Muller & Co. edge is to find the point of view from which the subject appears in its greatest simplicity”. This [3] H. Eyring, The activated complex in chemical reductionist study suggests that the distribution reactions. J. Chem. Phys. 3 (1935) 107-115.

7 [4] H.A. Kramers,Brownian motion in a field of [9] D. Michel. Basic statistical recipes for the emer- force and the diffusion model of chemical reac- gence of biochemical discernment. Prog. Bio- tions. Physica 7 (1940) 284-304. phys. Mol. Biol. 106 (2011) 498-516.

[10] H.P. Lu, L. Xun, X.S. Xie, Single-molecule enzy- [5] P. H¨anggi,P. Talkner, M. Borkovec, Reaction matic dynamics. Science 282 (1998) 1877-1882. rate theory: fifty years after Kramers, Rev. Mod. Phys. 62 (1990) 251-342. [11] D. Michel, Fine tuning gene expression through short DNA-protein binding cycles. Biochimie 91 [6] E. Pollak, P. Talkner, theory: (2009) 933-941. what it was, where is it today, and where is it going? Chaos 15 (2005) 26116. [12] K.J. Laidler, M.C. King, Development of transition-state theory. J. Phys. Chem. 87 (1983) 2657-2664. [7] Zhou, H.X. Rate theories for biologists. Q. Rev. Biophys. 43 (2010) 219-293. [13] R.K. Pathria, , Second Edi- tion (1996) (Butterworth-Heinemann). [8] Ninio, J. Kinetic and probabilistic thinking in accuracy. In: Accuracy in Molecular Processes [14] G.N. Lewis, G.N. A New Principle of Equilib- (1986) (Kirkwood, TBL, Rosenberger, RF & rium. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 11 (1925) Galas, DJ, eds). 179-183.

8