DOCSLIB.ORG

Explanation of Proposed Income Tax Treaty Between the United States and Hungary

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Explanation of Proposed Income Tax Treaty Between the United States and Hungary EXPLANATION OF PROPOSED INCOME TAX TREATY BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES AND HUNGARY Scheduled for a Hearing Before the COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS UNITED STATES SENATE On June 7, 2011 ____________ Prepared by the Staff of the JOINT COMMITTEE ON TAXATION May 20, 2011 JCX-32-11 CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1 I. SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................... 2 II. OVERVIEW OF U.S. TAXATION OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE AND INVESTMENT AND U.S. TAX TREATIES ....................................................................... 4 A. U.S. Tax Rules ................................................................................................................. 4 B. U.S. Tax Treaties .............................................................................................................. 6 III. OVERVIEW OF TAXATION IN HUNGARY .................................................................... 8 A. National Income Taxes ..................................................................................................... 8 B. International Aspects ...................................................................................................... 11 C. Other Taxes .................................................................................................................... 13 IV. THE UNITED STATES AND HUNGARY: CROSS-BORDER INVESTMENT AND TRADE....................................................................................................................... 15 A. Introduction .................................................................................................................... 15 B. Overview of International Transactions Between the United States and Hungary ........ 16 C. Income Taxes and Withholding Taxes on Cross-Border Income Flows ....................... 19 D. Analyzing the Economic Effects of Income Tax Treaties ............................................. 20 V. EXPLANATION OF PROPOSED TREATY ..................................................................... 21 Article 1. General Scope .............................................................................................. 21 Article 2. Taxes Covered ............................................................................................. 25 Article 3. General Definitions ...................................................................................... 25 Article 4. Resident ....................................................................................................... 27 Article 5. Permanent Establishment ............................................................................. 29 Article 6. Income from Immovable Property (Real Property) ..................................... 30 Article 7. Business Profits............................................................................................ 31 Article 8. Shipping and Air Transport ......................................................................... 36 Article 9. Associated Enterprises ................................................................................. 37 Article 10. Dividends ................................................................................................... 38 Article 11. Interest ....................................................................................................... 42 Article 12. Royalties .................................................................................................... 45 Article 13. Capital Gains .............................................................................................. 46 Article 14. Income from Employment ......................................................................... 48 Article 15. Directors’ Fees ........................................................................................... 49 Article 16. Entertainers and Sportsmen ....................................................................... 49 Article 17. Pensions and Income from Social Security ............................................... 51 Article 18. Government Service .................................................................................. 53 i Article 19. Students and Trainees ................................................................................ 54 Article 20. Professors and Teachers ............................................................................. 55 Article 21. Other Income ............................................................................................. 55 Article 22. Limitation on Benefits ............................................................................... 57 Article 23. Relief from Double Taxation ..................................................................... 69 Article 24. Non-Discrimination ................................................................................... 72 Article 25. Mutual Agreement Procedure .................................................................... 75 Article 26. Exchange of Information and Administrative Assistance ......................... 76 Article 27. Members of Diplomatic Missions and Consular Posts .............................. 79 Article 28. Entry into Force ......................................................................................... 80 Article 29. Termination ................................................................................................ 80 VI. ISSUES ................................................................................................................................ 82 A. Treaty Shopping ............................................................................................................. 82 B. Exchange of Information and Administrative Assistance .............................................. 85 1. Methods of exchange of information ....................................................................... 87 2. U.S. reciprocity in providing information on beneficial ownership ........................ 89 3. Override of domestic law privileges or confidentiality ........................................... 90 ii INTRODUCTION This pamphlet,1 prepared by the staff of the Joint Committee on Taxation, describes the proposed income tax treaty between the United States and Hungary (the “proposed treaty”). The proposed treaty was signed on February 4, 2010, and is accompanied by official understandings implemented by an exchange of diplomatic notes (collectively the “diplomatic notes”) carried out on that same day. The Senate Committee on Foreign Relations has scheduled a public hearing on the proposed treaty for June 7, 2011.2 Part I of the pamphlet provides a summary of the proposed treaty. Part II provides a brief overview of U.S. tax laws relating to international trade and investment and of U.S. income tax treaties in general. Part III contains a brief overview of Hungary’s tax laws. Part IV provides a discussion of investment and trade flows between the United States and Hungary. Part V contains an article-by-article explanation of the proposed treaty. Part VI contains a discussion of issues relating to the proposed treaty. 1 This pamphlet may be cited as follows: Joint Committee on Taxation, Explanation of Proposed Income Tax Treaty Between the United States and Hungary (JCX-32-11), May 20, 2011. References to “the Code” are to the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. This document is available on the internet at http://www.jct.gov/. 2 For a copy of the proposed treaty, see Senate Treaty Doc. 111-7. 1 I. SUMMARY The principal purposes of the proposed treaty are to reduce or eliminate double taxation of income earned by residents of each country from sources within the other country, and to prevent avoidance or evasion of the taxes of the two countries. The proposed treaty also is intended to promote close economic cooperation between the two countries and to eliminate possible barriers to trade and investment caused by overlapping taxing jurisdictions of the two countries. As in other U.S. tax treaties, these objectives principally are achieved through each country’s agreement to limit, in certain specified situations, its right to tax income derived from its territory by residents of the other country. For example, the proposed treaty contains provisions under which each country generally agrees not to tax business income derived from sources within that country by residents of the other country unless the business activities in the taxing country are substantial enough to constitute a permanent establishment (Article 7). Similarly, the proposed treaty contains certain exemptions under which residents of one country performing personal services in the other country will not be required to pay tax in the other country unless their contact with the other country exceeds specified minimums (Articles 14 and 16). The proposed treaty also provides that pensions and other similar remuneration paid to a resident of one country may be taxed only by that country and only at the time and to the extent that a pension distribution is made (Article 17). The proposed treaty provides that dividends and certain gains derived by a resident of one country from sources within the other country generally may be taxed by both countries (Articles 10 and 13); however, the rate of tax that the source country may impose on a resident of the other
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Government of the Hungarian People's Republic
    CONVENTION BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE HUNGARIAN PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE ITALIAN REPUBLIC FOR THE AVOIDANCE OF DOUBLE TAXATION WITH RESPECT TO TAXES ON INCOME AND CAPITAL AND THE PREVENTION OF FISCAL EVASION.1 The Government of the Hungarian People's Republic and the Government of the Italian Republic, desiring to promote and facilitate the economic relations between the two countries, have agreed to conclude a Convention for the avoidance of double taxation with respect to taxes on income and capital and the prevention of fiscal evasion of which the provisions are the following: Article 1 - Personal scope This Convention shall apply to persons who are residents of one or both of the Contracting States. Article 2 - Taxes covered 1. This Convention shall apply to taxes on income and on capital imposed on behalf of each Contracting State or its political or administrative subdivisions or local authorities, irrespective of the manner in which they are levied. 2. There shall be regarded as taxes on income and on capital taxes imposed on total income, on total capital, or on elements of income or of capital, including taxes on gains from the alienation of movable or immovable property, taxes on the total amounts of wages or salaries paid by enterprises, as well as taxes on capital appreciation. 3. The existing taxes to which this Convention shall apply are the following: (a) in the case of the Italian Republic: (1) the individual income tax (imposta sul reddito delle persone fisiche); (2) the tax on the income of legal entities (imposta sul reddito delle persone giuridiche); and (3) the local income tax (imposta locale sui redditi), even if withheld at the source (hereinafter referred to as "Italian tax"); (b) in the case of the Hungarian People's Republic: (1) the income taxes (j”vedelemad¢k); (2) the profit taxes (nyeres‚gad¢k); (3) the enterprises' special tax (v llalati kl”nad¢); (4) the tax on buildings (h zad¢); 1 Date of Conclusion: 16 May 1977.
    [Show full text]
  • Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS)
    Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) BEPS Action 7 Additional Guidance on the Attribution of Profits to Permanent Establishments 4 October 2017 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS AFME and UK Finance .................................................................................................................. 5 Andrew Cousins & Richard Newby ............................................................................................... 8 Andrew Hickman ............................................................................................................................ 13 ANIE (Federazione Nazionale Imprese Elettrotecniche ed Elettroniche) ....................................... 19 Association of British Insurers ....................................................................................................... 22 BDI ...... .......................................................................................................................................... 24 BDO...... .......................................................................................................................................... 26 BEPS Monitoring Group ................................................................................................................ 29 BIAC ... .......................................................................................................................................... 47 BusinessEurope .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Taxation Convention with Austria Message from The
    TAXATION CONVENTION WITH AUSTRIA MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES TRANSMITTING CONVENTION BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE REPUBLIC OF AUSTRIA FOR THE AVOIDANCE OF DOUBLE TAXATION AND THE PREVENTION OF FISCAL EVASION WITH RESPECT TO TAXES ON INCOME, SIGNED AT VIENNA ON MAY 31, 1996. GENERAL EFFECTIVE DATE UNDER ARTICLE 28: 1 JANUARY 1999 TABLE OF ARTICLES Article 1----------------------------------Personal Scope Article 2----------------------------------Taxes Covered Article 3----------------------------------General Definitions Article 4----------------------------------Resident Article 5----------------------------------Permanent Establishment Article 6----------------------------------Income from Real Property Article 7----------------------------------Business Profits Article 8----------------------------------Shipping and Air Transport Article 9----------------------------------Associated Enterprises Article 10--------------------------------Dividends Article 11--------------------------------Interest Article 12--------------------------------Royalties Article 13--------------------------------Capital Gains Article 14--------------------------------Independent Personal Services Article 15--------------------------------Dependent Personal Services Article 16--------------------------------Limitation on Benefits Article 17--------------------------------Artistes and Athletes Article 18--------------------------------Pensions Article 19--------------------------------Government Service Article 20--------------------------------Students
    [Show full text]
  • Handbuch Investment in Germany
    Investment in Germany A practical Investor Guide to the Tax and Regulatory Landscape in Germany 2016 International Business Preface © 2016 KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. Investment in Germany 3 Germany is one of the most attractive places for foreign direct investment. The reasons are abundant: A large market in the middle of Europe, well-connected to its neighbors and markets around the world, top-notch research institutions, a high level of industrial production, world leading manufacturing companies, full employment, economic and political stability. However, doing business in Germany is no simple task. The World Bank’s “ease of doing business” ranking puts Germany in 15th place overall, but as low as 107th place when it comes to starting a business and 72nd place in terms of paying taxes. Marko Gründig The confusing mixture of competences of regional, federal, and Managing Partner European authorities adds to the German gift for bureaucracy. Tax KPMG, Germany Numerous legislative changes have taken effect since we last issued this guide in 2011. Particularly noteworthy are the Act on the Modification and Simplification of Business Taxation and of the Tax Law on Travel Expenses (Gesetz zur Änderung und Ver einfachung der Unternehmensbesteuerung und des steuerlichen Reisekostenrechts), the 2015 Tax Amendment Act (Steueränderungsgesetz 2015), and the Accounting Directive Implementation Act (Bilanzrichtlinie-Umsetzungsgesetz). The remake of Investment in Germany provides you with the most up-to-date guide on the German business and legal envi- ronment.* You will be equipped with a comprehensive overview of issues concerning your investment decision and business Andreas Glunz activities including economic facts, legal forms, subsidies, tariffs, Managing Partner accounting principles, and taxation.
    [Show full text]
  • 94 Commentary on Article 5 Concerning the Definition
    COMMENTARY ON ARTICLE 5 CONCERNING THE DEFINITION OF PERMANENT ESTABLISHMENT 1. The main use of the concept of a permanent establishment is to determine the right of a Contracting State to tax the profits of an enterprise of the other Contracting State. Under Article 7 a Contracting State cannot tax the profits of an enterprise of the other Contracting State unless it carries on its business through a permanent establishment situated therein. 1.1 Before 2000, income from professional services and other activities of an independent character was dealt under a separate Article, i.e. Article 14. The provisions of that Article were similar to those applicable to business profits but it used the concept of fixed base rather than that of permanent establishment since it had originally been thought that the latter concept should be reserved to commercial and industrial activities. The elimination of Article 14 in 2000 reflected the fact that there were no intended differences between the concepts of permanent establishment, as used in Article 7, and fixed base, as used in Article 14, or between how profits were computed and tax was calculated according to which of Article 7 or 14 applied. The elimination of Article 14 therefore meant that the definition of permanent establishment became applicable to what previously constituted a fixed base. Paragraph 1 2. Paragraph 1 gives a general definition of the term “permanent establishment” which brings out its essential characteristics of a permanent establishment in the sense of the Convention, i.e. a distinct “situs”, a “fixed place of business”. The paragraph defines the term “permanent establishment” as a fixed place of business, through which the business of an enterprise is wholly or partly carried on.
    [Show full text]
  • Adopting the New International Tax Rules and Standards How Developing Countries in Asia and the Pacifi C Stand to Benefi T—If They Engage!
    The Governance Brief ɆŹƀɆƷɆŹŷŸž Adopting the New International Tax Rules and Standards How Developing Countries in Asia and the Pacifi c Stand to Benefi t—If They Engage! By Richard Highfi eld1 Introduction This brief presents a major challenge for all developing countries, particularly their Mobilizing the domestic resources of developing respective ministries of fi nance and national tax countries and making better use of international administrations that together play a critical role assistance has been the subject of considerable in setting revenue mobilization objectives, and discussion over the past 2 years, and is a key determining strategies and approaches for their direction and commitment refl ected in the Addis realization. Tax Initiative Declaration of 2015,2 and the UN’s In a session at the International Monetary Sustainable Development Goal 17 (Target 1): Fund (IMF)-World Bank Spring Meetings held in April 2016 titled “Collect More and Spend Better,” “Strengthen domestic resource mobilization, it was observed that billions of dollars of potential including through international support to tax revenue remain uncollected each year in many developing countries, to improve domestic developing countries, either due to poor tax system For inquires, comments, 3 capacity for tax and other revenue collection.” design or weaknesses in tax administration. A fair and suggestions, please contact the editor of the Governance Brief, Claudia Buentjen at +632 683 1852 or [email protected], 1 Richard Highfi eld works as consultant with ADB on tax administration and is also an Adjunct Professor with the University SDCC Thematic of New South Wales’ School of Business in Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • OECD Multilateral Instrument Status Tracker
    OECD Multilateral Instrument status tracker Current as of 1 June 2019 Introduction 1 Status of the MLI as at 1 June 2019 2 World heat map 2 Europe 3 Asia-Pacific and the Middle East 4 Americas 5 Africa 6 Matrices of CTAs 7 Appendices 15 Contacts 18 OECD Multilateral Instrument status tracker | Introduction Introduction Scope This document is a status tracker for the implementation • OECD BEPS Project – The BEPS project supported by of the Multilateral Convention to Implement Tax the G20 now includes over 100 countries. Countries Treaty Related Measures to Prevent Base Erosion and are able to take part in the ongoing work if they Profit Shifting generally referred to as the Multilateral commit to implementation of the agreed minimum Instrument or MLI. This MLI status tracker is intended to standards. consolidate general information on the application of the • OECD Model Tax Convention – The OECD Model treaty. The tracker has been reviewed and updated as of Tax Convention on Income and on Capital is the model 1 June 2019. traditionally used by developed economies when negotiating double tax conventions. As at 1 June 2019, 88 jurisdictions have signed the MLI, and 26 of those jurisdictions have also deposited their • Tax treaty – A tax convention between two instruments of ratification with the OECD. jurisdictions for the avoidance of double taxation with respect to taxes on income and on capital. Please note the following definitions used in the document: The MLI status tracker is intended to be a quick reference guide, and is not an exhaustive overview of all information relating to the MLI.
    [Show full text]
  • ATI Working Paper
    WP/19/01 ATI Working Paper The evolution of property taxes in post- Socialist countries in Central and Eastern Europe Jan Brzeski Anna Románová Riël Franzsen The evolution of property taxes in post-Socialist countries in Central and Eastern Europe Jan Brzeski1 Anna Románová2 Riël Franzsen3 ABSTRACT This paper discusses the evolution of recurrent property taxes in transition economies of Central and Eastern Europe (CEE). The persistent use of an area-based property tax formula in some of these countries and the generally weak revenue performance of the property tax in most of these countries tend to slow the growth of urban productivity and, consequently, impact negatively on overall economic performance. It focuses on property taxation characteristics in these countries that are relevant to the urban (re)development challenges, describing in more detail the approaches in various countries, selected on the basis of their different tax-base formulae, revenue performance, reform directions and reform efforts. Lastly, the paper suggests possible ways forward to ensure a more significant role for the property tax in urban (re)development processes in CEE countries. Key words: CEE countries, post-Socialist economies, property tax, tax-base formulae JEL Classification: H71; P25; R51 1 International Property Tax Institute, Poland 2 Pavol Jozef Šafárik University in Košice, Slovakia 3 African Tax Institute, University of Pretoria, South Africa 1 1. Introduction ‘Transition countries’ constitute a wide range of post-Socialist economies in Central Europe, Eastern Europe, South-Eastern Europe, the Baltics, the Russian Federation and the former Socialist republics of Central Asia. These post-Socialist economies, undergoing a transition towards a market economy, have been facing a daunting challenge of reallocating their basic resources (i.e., land, capital, labour) and reshaping their ‘misdeveloped’4 cities towards higher urban productivity through more efficient use of urban land and buildings.
    [Show full text]
  • Business Location Austria: Tax Aspects
    Business Location Austria: Tax Aspects Overview of different forms of taxation In many areas, Austrian tax regulations are tied to the legal form of the taxable entity. The operating income of corporations (page 2) such as the GmbH (limited liability company) and the Aktiengesellschaft (joint stock company) are subject to corporate income taxes, whereas in the case of natural persons (page 16), the Austrian Income Tax Act distinguishes between earnings from business operations and other forms of income, in which case income is determined independently of each other. The total income is then subject to the income tax. Within the context of setting up a company, the question often arises as to precisely when business people are required to register with tax authorities and the scope of activity which will subsequently entail a tax obligation. The chapter “Branch Offices - Permanent Establishments” (page 13) deals with this aspect and related issues of deferred taxes. In addition to personal taxes, so-called “non-personal” exist which depend on the respective circumstances. These include the value added tax, real estate transfer tax, stamp duties and fees for legal transactions. The chapter on corporations provides more details about non- personal taxes. However, for the most part they are independent of the particular legal structure, and thus can also apply to natural persons and production sites. Many fields of activity are supported via tax benefits, namely tax allowances or tax credits. In particular, this includes the 14 percent research tax credit in the field of R&D, which can be claimed for in-house research and contract research.
    [Show full text]
  • Rich Source Countries
    CCSI Briefing Note Luis M. Almeida and Perrine Toledano1,2 March 2018 UnderstandingCCSI Briefing Note how the various definitionsLuis of Permanent Almeida and Perrine Establishment Toledano1,2 March 2018 can limit the taxation ability of resource- rich source countries Key CCSI Points Briefing Note Luis Almeida and Perrine Toledano1,2 March 2018 Double Taxation Agreements (DTAs) are bilateral tax treaties that are designed to reduce the negative impact of double taxation through the Understanding 1 allocation of taxing rights to how the State the of residence various (i.e. where thedefinitions company has its base) of and Permanent to the State of source (i.e.Establishment where the taxable operations takes place); canCCSI limit Briefing the Note taxation ability of resource- richLuis so Almeidaurce countries and Perrine Toledano1,2 The allocation of the rights to tax business profits of non-resident entities’ operations depends on whether these operations can constitute a Key1 Points March 2018 2 “Permanent Establishment” (PE) according to the definition included in each DTA. If non-resident entities fulfill the criteria established in this PE definition, taxation is due at the source State. On the contrary, if non-resident entities fall outside of the scope of this definition, the residence State obtains these rights. DTAs can therefore result in source States losing significant tax revenue from operations of non-residents (unless such Ke2 Luis Almeida and Perrine Toledano1,2 UnderstandingCCSIoperations Briefing are conducted Note under
    [Show full text]
  • Fifty Shades of Tax Dodging the EU’S Role in Supporting an Unjust Global Tax System
    STOP Fifty Shades of Tax Dodging The EU’s role in supporting an unjust global tax system A report coordinated by Eurodad Acknowledgements This report was coordinated by Eurodad with contributions from civil society organisations in countries across Europe including: 11.11.11 (Belgium); Centre national de coopération au développement (CNCD-11.11.11) (Belgium); Glopolis (Czech Republic); IBIS (Denmark); Demnet (Hungary); CCFD-Terre Solidaire (France); Oxfam France (France); World Economy, Ecology & Development (WEED) (Germany); Global Policy Forum (Germany); Debt and Development Coalition Ireland (DDCI) (Ireland); Re:Common (Italy); the Centre for Research on Multinational Corporations (SOMO) (Netherlands); Instytut Globalnej Odpowiedzialnosci (Poland); InspirAction (Spain); Oxfam Intermón (Spain); Ekvilib Institute (Slovenia); Forum Syd (Sweden); Christian Aid (UK). A special acknowledgement goes to doctoral researcher Martin Hearson of the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE) for providing data and valuable input on the sections related to tax treaties. Each chapter was written by – and is the responsibility of – the nationally-based partners in the project, and does not reflect the views of the rest of the project partners. The chapter on Luxembourg was written by – and is the responsibility of – Eurodad. For more information, contact Eurodad: Rue d’Edimbourg, 18 – 26 Mundo B building (3rd floor) 1050 Ixelles, Brussels, Belgium tel: +32 (0) 2 894 46 40 e-fax: +32 (0) 2 791 98 09 www.eurodad.org Design and artwork: James Adams Copy editing: Vicky Anning, Julia Ravenscroft and Zala Zbogar. The authors believe that all of the details in this report are factually accurate as of 5 October 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • 3. Income Taxation 10
    Comparison of the Tax Structure in Central European... Contents Introduction 4 1. Development of Tax Ratios 5 2. Consumption Taxation 7 3. Income Taxation 10 3.1 Labor Income Taxation 10 3.2 Taxation on Profits 17 3.3 Taxation on Capital 18 Conclusions 19 Bibliography 21 Tables: Table 1: Tax Ratios in CEC and EU Countries 6 Table 2: VAT Rates in CEC and EU Countries 8-9 Table 3: Effective Consumption Tax Rates 9 Table 4: Description of the deductibles, rates and brackets of Individual Income Tax in CEC 11-12 Table 5: Taxation of an Average Production Worker's Labor Income, in CEC and EU countries 13-14 Table 6: Corporate Income Tax Rates in CEC and EU Countries 18 Table 7: Taxation of Capital in 1995 in CEC 19 3 CASE Foundation D. Vaskova Introduction The economic transformation process in Central European Countries (CEC)1 has profoundly affected public finance. The process of reforming public finance (covering both tax and expenditure reforms) is a long lasting one with specific features in individual countries. This makes a comparison over relatively short time periods difficult. Nevertheless, some common, general features to the restructuring of CEC public finances can be identified. There were at least three main aspects of the inherited tax systems which required urgent reform to facilitate the transition to a market economy: 1. the need to establish a system of parametric profit taxation that would eliminate the "soft budget constraints" and support incentive driven forces in the economy; 2. the necessity to achieve universal and equal tax treatment of different sectors, commodities, and forms of ownership to ensure that resource allocation would be driven by undistorted market forces; and 3.
    [Show full text]