DOCSLIB.ORG

The Open Organization Guide for Educators

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Open Organization Guide for Educators The Open Organization Guide for Educators The Open Organization Guide for Educators Transformative teaching and learning for a rapidly changing world Contributing authors (in alphabetical order) Amarachi Achonu Mukkai Krishnamoorthy Beth Anderson Gina Likins Bryan Behrenshausen Clara May Maxwell Bushong Ian McDermott Carolyn Butler Dan McGuire Curtis A. Carver Christopher McHale Aria F. Chernik Race MoChridhe Susie Choi Steven Ovadia Dipankar Dasgupta Ben Owens Heidi Ellis David Preston Denise Ferebee Rahul Razdan David Goldschmidt Charlie Reisinger Adam Haigler Justin Sherman Jim Hall Wesley Turner Tanner Johnson Shobha Tyagi Marcus Kelly Jim Whitehurst Ryan Williams Copyright Copyright © 2019 Red Hat, Inc. All written content, as well as the cover image, licensed under a Creative Commons Attribu- tion-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.1 Amarachi Achonu's "Making computer science curricula as adaptable as our code" originally appeared at https://opensource.- com/open-organization/19/4/adaptable-curricula-computer-science Beth Anderson's "An open process for discovering our school's core values" originally appeared at https://opensource.- com/open-organization/16/6/opening-discover-education-centers- core-values. Curtis A. Carver's "Crowdsourcing our way to a campus IT plan" originally appeared at https://opensource.com/open-organiza- tion/17/10/uab-100-wins-through-crowdsourcing. Brandon Dixon and Randall Joyce's "The most valuable cy- bersecurity education is an open one" originally appeared at https://opensource.com/open-organization/19/8/open-cybersecu- rity-education. Heidi Ellis' "What happened when I let my students fork the syllabus" originally appeared at https://opensource.com/open-orga- nization/18/11/making-course-syllabus-open. Heidi Ellis' "Open organizations on Mars" originally ap- peared at https://opensource.com/open-organization/18/1/imagining-open- communities. Adam Haigler's "Truly open education will require sweeping changes" originally appeared at https://opensource.com/open-orga- nization/18/1/open-education-public-mission. Jim Hall's "M-learning and beyond" originally appeared at https://opensource.com/open-organization/19/7/m-learning-open- education. 1 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ Tanner Johnson's "How our organization works openly to make education accessible" first appeared at https://opensource.- com/open-organization/19/2/building-curriculahub. Gina Likins' "Performing the collaborative dilemma" origi- nally appeared in The Open Organization Workbook. Race MoChridhe's "Confronting linguistic bias: The case for an open human language" originally appeared at https://open- source.com/open-organization/19/4/open-language-for-open- education. Ben Owens' "Can schools be agile?" originally appeared at https://opensource.com/open-organization/19/4/education-culture- agile. Charlie Reisinger's "The open schoolhouse: Culture, praxis, empowerment" originally appeared at https://opensource.com/ open-organization/19/7/open-schoolhouse-empowerment. Justin Sherman's "The future of ethical tech education must be open" originally appeared at https://opensource.com/open-orga- nization/19/6/future-ethical-tech-edu-open. Jim Whitehrust's "Open education is more than open con- tent" originally appeared at https://opensource.com/open- organization/16/8/harnessing-power-open-education. Colophon Typeset in DejaVu2 and Red Hat.3 Produced with LibreOffice.4 Cover design by Clara May and Ryan Williams. Version 1. 1 September 2019 2 https://dejavu-fonts.github.io/ 3 https://github.com/RedHatOfficial/RedHatFont 4 https://www.libreoffice.org/ !dditional reading "rom Jim Whitehurst The Open Organization: Igniting passion and performance (Har- vard Business Review Press) Organize for Innovation: Rethinking how we work (Opensource.- com) "rom the open organization community The Open Organization Field Guide: Practical tips for igniting pas- sion and performance (Opensource.com) The Open Organization Leaders Manual: A handbook for building innovative and engaged teams (Opensource.com) The Open Organization Workbook: How to build a culture of inno- vation in your organization (Opensource.com) The Open Organization Guide to IT Culture Change: Open princi- ples and practices for a more innovative IT department (Opensource.com) Every week, Opensource.com publishes new stories about the ways open principles help innovative leaders rethink organizational cul- ture and design. Visit opensource.com/open-organization to read more. Contents Preface 15 Bryan Behrenshausen About the cover 18 Clara May & Ryan Williams Foreword 20 Aria F. Chernik Visions Economics, openness, and the education system 25 Rahul Razdan Truly open education will require sweeping changes 34 Adam Haigler The future of ethical tech education must be open 41 Justin Sherman A practical path to open education 50 Dan McGuire Can schools be agile? 62 Ben Owens M-learning and beyond 68 Jim Hall The most valuable cybersecurity education is an open one 73 Brandon Dixon & Randall Joyce Rethinking assessment in an open, peeragogical learning environment 80 David Preston Three ways university classrooms can be more open 88 Susie Choi Open education is more than open content 93 Jim Whitehurst Case %tudies A hybrid model of open source in academics: The Rensselaer Center for Open Source 100 Wesley Turner, David Goldschmidt & Mukkai Krishnamoorthy Teaching students to critically evaluate textbooks 110 Christopher McHale, Ian McDermott & Steven Ovadia What happened when I let my students fork the syllabus 118 Heidi Ellis An open process for discovering our school's core values 126 Beth Anderson 5PH1NX: 5tudent Peer Heuristic for 1Nformation Xchange (a slightly transmedia use case in Open Source Learning and peeragogical assessment) 133 David Preston The open schoolhouse: Culture, praxis, empowerment 143 Charlie Reisinger Flip the script: An open community of practice at the student help desk 149 Maxwell Bushong Open education has a POSSE 156 Shobha Tyagi Confronting linguistic bias: The case for an open human language 163 Race MoChridhe Crowdsourcing our way to a campus IT plan 170 Curtis A. Carver How our organization works openly to make education accessible 176 Tanner Johnson Making computer science curricula as adaptable as our code 186 Amarachi Achonu !ctivities Making those (dreaded) faculty meetings transparent, collaborative, and effective 192 Aria F. Chernik & Tanner Johnson Digital forensics the open way: A tabletop approach to common scenarios 198 Denise Ferebee, Carolyn Butler, Dipankar Dasgupta & Marcus Kelly How to collect feedback from your students (or, how to assess the sting of teenage rejection) 212 Charlie Reisinger Performing the collaborative dilemma 216 Gina Likins Open organizations on Mars 228 Heidi Ellis Afterword 233 Ben Owens !ppendi& The Open Organization Definition 238 The Open Organization Ambassadors 'earn (ore Additional resources 246 Get involved 247 Preface Bryan Behrenshausen ne of this book's proposed subtitles was "Revolutionizing O teaching and learning for a more collaborative future." It certainly was compelling. Who doesn't love a good revolution? But like "The Simpsons'" Nelson Muntz staring disappoint- edly at the cinema marquee for "Naked Lunch," co-editors Aria Chernik and Ben Owens mulled our work and said, "I can think of at least two things wrong with that title."5 The Open Organization Guide for Educators features stories from teachers, administrators, and students who certainly have embraced a collaborative, iterative, transparent, inclusive—and, in a word, more open—approach to building educational organiza- tions. As they've all demonstrated, it's an approach to education with the power to create classrooms that are more engaging and learner-centered, faculty meetings that foreground meritocracy and accountability, lessons that are open to anyone's feedback and modification, assessments that empower rather than punish, and teaching communities built first and foremost on trust and a propensity for sharing. And nothing about it should seem revolutionary. In fact, referring to it that way risks giving the impression that it's some kind of radical or eccentric set of ideas about teach- ing and learning. But the possibility that someone might perceive it as such should give anyone pause. After all, the authors in this vol- ume don't sound like revolutionaries. They sound like dedicated advocates for an education system that's in sync with its technical, 5 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9sL102pyaLg 15 The Open Organization Guide for Educators social, economic, and ethical contexts; that's preparing people to act not only effectively but also humanely in those contexts; and that's capable of responding adequately when those contexts in- evitably shift. Education doesn't need revolution. It needs a thoughtful, careful, and deliberate upgrade for the 21st century. So that word had to go. And disappear it did—in favor of something that emphasized open education's transformative power. One final matter, then, was "the future." The reality is that educators aren't advocating greater open- ness as a way of preparing students for the future. They're doing it to help them participate in the world as it is today. Increasingly, modern organizations are more dynamic and nonhierarchical. They're filled with people intrinsically motivated by visions and val- ues that transcend the profit motive. And they're more porous, connecting more readily with external partners and communities. Authors of the forthcoming pages want
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Examples of the Electronic Health Record (EHR)
    Examples of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) What is Biomedical & Health Informatics? William Hersh Copyright 2020 Oregon Health & Science University Examples of the EHR • Using the Veterans Health Information Systems and Technology Architecture (VistA) • Why VistA? – State-of-the-art EHR that has transformed healthcare in the Veteran’s Health Administration (VHA) (Perlin, 2006; Byrne, 2010) – Not that pretty, but has all of the modern features of the EHR, e.g., clinical decision support (CDS), computerized provider order entry (CPOE), etc. – Distributed under open-source model, unlike most other vendors who do not even allow screen shots to be shown outside their customers’ institutions • Fascinating story (Allen, 2017), but VistA now being phased out in favor of Cerner EHR adopted by Department of Defense (VA, 2017) – https://www.ehrm.va.gov/ WhatIs5 2 1 Some details about VistA • Server written in M (formerly called MUMPS), accessed via command-line interface – Runs in commercial Intersystems Cache (on many platforms) or open-source GT.M (Linux only) • Client (called CPRS) written in Delphi and providers graphical user interface – Only runs on Windows (just about all versions) WhatIs5 3 Logging on to CPRS, the front end to VistA WhatIs5 4 2 Choosing a patient WhatIs5 5 Cover sheet – overview WhatIs5 6 3 Drilling down to details of a problem WhatIs5 7 Details of an allergy WhatIs5 8 4 Viewing vital signs over time WhatIs5 9 More details on problems WhatIs5 10 5 List of active orders WhatIs5 11 Viewing the patient’s notes WhatIs5 12
    [Show full text]
  • Open Source As an Alternative for Clinical Information Systems Adoption
    Open Source as an Alternative for Clinical Information Systems Adoption Placide Poba-Nzaou , Université du Québec à Montréal Josianne Marsan , Université Laval Guy Paré , HEC Montréal Louis Raymond , Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières Health Informatics & Technology Conference October 20-22, 2014 - Baltimore, MD, USA Agenda • Context • Research Questions • Conceptual Background • Research Method • Results • Discussion • Conclusion 2 Context • Electronic Health Records (EHR) are at the heart of most health system reforms – “Mission-critical” applications for hospitals • High costs and low level of interoperability of commercial EHR software has led a growing number of hospitals to adopt open source software (OSS) solutions – Examples of OSS EHR: VistA, Oscar, GNU Med, OpenEMR and OpenMRS, etc. 3 Research Questions • What can motivate a Hospital to adopt an Open Source EHR ? • What are the main challenges faced by a hospital adopting an Open Source EHR ? • What can be done to deal with these challenges ? 4 Conceptual Background • Motivations to adopt an Enterprise System by healthcare organizations (Poba-Nzaou et al., 2014) – Strategic (Clinical vs. Managerial) – Operational (Clinical vs. Managerial) – Financial – Technological • Hybrid organization – “Organization that combine different institutional logics in unprecedented ways” (Scott and Meyer 1991) • E.g.: integration of not-for-profit and for-profit logics (Battilana et al., 2012) – Challenges faced by Hybrid Organizations in search of sustainability (Battilana et al., 2012) – #1: Legal Structure – #2: Financing – #3: Customers and Beneficiaries 5 – #4: Organizational Culture and Talent Development Conceptual Background (continued) – OSS governance models • “the means of achieving the direction, control, and coordination of wholly or partially autonomous individuals and organizations on behalf of an OSS development project to which they jointly contribute” (Markus, 2007) – “community managed” vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Mobile Applications for the Health Sector
    Mobile Applications for the Health Sector Christine Zhenwei Qiang, Masatake Yamamichi*, Vicky Hausman and Daniel Altman ICT Sector Unit World Bank December 2011 This report is the product of the staff and consultants of the World Bank. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions do not necessarily reflect the views of the Executive Directors of the World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. * Corresponding author: 1818 H Street NW, MSN MC6-616, Washington DC 20433, USA. [email protected] Contents Abbreviations ................................................................................................................... 3 Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................... 4 Executive Summary ........................................................................................................... 5 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 11 1.1 What is mobile health? 11 1.2 Technological context for mobile health 12 1.3 Perceived potential of mobile health 13 1.4 The mobile health ecosystem 16 1.5 Social goals of investments in mobile health 17 1.6 How does mobile health relate to other intersections of health and technology? 19 2 Health Needs in Developing Countries ...................................................................... 21 2.1 Common health burdens 21 2.2 Challenges
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Open-Source Electronic Health Record Systems Based on Functional and User Performance Criteria
    Original Article Healthc Inform Res. 2019 April;25(2):89-98. https://doi.org/10.4258/hir.2019.25.2.89 pISSN 2093-3681 • eISSN 2093-369X Comparison of Open-Source Electronic Health Record Systems Based on Functional and User Performance Criteria Saptarshi Purkayastha1, Roshini Allam1, Pallavi Maity1, Judy W. Gichoya2 1Department of BioHealth Informatics, Indiana University–Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, USA 2Dotter Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA Objectives: Open-source Electronic Health Record (EHR) systems have gained importance. The main aim of our research is to guide organizational choice by comparing the features, functionality, and user-facing system performance of the five most popular open-source EHR systems. Methods: We performed qualitative content analysis with a directed approach on recently published literature (2012–2017) to develop an integrated set of criteria to compare the EHR systems. The functional criteria are an integration of the literature, meaningful use criteria, and the Institute of Medicine’s functional requirements of EHR, whereas the user-facing system performance is based on the time required to perform basic tasks within the EHR system. Results: Based on the Alexa web ranking and Google Trends, the five most popular EHR systems at the time of our study were OSHERA VistA, GNU Health, the Open Medical Record System (OpenMRS), Open Electronic Medical Record (OpenEMR), and OpenEHR. We also found the trends in popularity of the EHR systems and the locations where they were more popular than others. OpenEMR met all the 32 functional criteria, OSHERA VistA met 28, OpenMRS met 12 fully and 11 partially, OpenEHR-based EHR met 10 fully and 3 partially, and GNU Health met the least with only 10 criteria fully and 2 partially.
    [Show full text]
  • Electronic Health Record Security Guidance for Low-Resource Settings
    Assessment Tool for Electronic Health Record Security Guidance for Low-Resource Settings April 2020 MEASURE Evaluation This publication was produced with the support of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) under University of North Carolina the terms of MEASURE Evaluation cooperative agreement 123 West Franklin Street, Suite 330 AID-OAA-L-14-00004. MEASURE Evaluation is implemented by the Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, NC 27516 USA at Chapel Hill in partnership with ICF International; John Phone: +1 919-445-9350 Snow, Inc.; Management Sciences for Health; Palladium; [email protected] and Tulane University. Views expressed are not necessarily those of USAID or the United States government. MS-20-195 www.measureevaluation.org ISBN: 978-1-64232-260-6 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) for its support of this work. We’d like to recognize the project management team and the technical support we received from Jason B. Smith, Manish Kumar, and David La’Vell Johnson of MEASURE Evaluation at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC); Herman Tolentino, Steven Yoon, Tadesse Wuhib, Eric-Jan Manders, Daniel Rosen, Carrie Preston, Nathan Volk, and Adebowale Ojo of the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC); Mark DeZalia at the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR); and Nega Gebreyesus, Kristen Wares, and Jacob Buehler at USAID. The MEASURE Evaluation project, funded by USAID and PEPFAR, would like to thank the Monitoring and Evaluation Technical Support Program at the Makerere University School of Public Health in Uganda for its cooperation and support in testing this tool and providing valuable feedback and insight.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Source Et Gestion De L'information Médicale : Aperçu Des Projets Existants
    Open source et gestion de l'information médicale : aperçu des projets existants Ateliers CISP Club 2011 – Alexandre BRULET Open Source : bref historique... 1969 : UNIX (Bell Labs°) 1975 : distribué à des universités pour « fins éducatives » avec les codes sources... 1977 : projet BSD 1984 : projet GNU (R. Stallman) (sources partagées) 1985 : Free Software Fondation (cadre légal – licence GPL) 1989 : licence BSD modifiée (open source) 1991 : noyau GNU/Linux ? OS dérivés (NetBSD, FreeBSD, SunOS ...) 1993 : Slackware 1993 : Debian 1994 : Red Hat > 50 OS dérivés > 100 OS dérivés 1998 : MPL (ex : SUSE) > 50 OS dérivés (Knopix, Ubuntu...) (Mandriva, Fedora ...) 1999 : licence Apache UNESCO 2004 : logiciels libres patrimoine de l'humanité (…) > 35 licences libres recensées sur wikipédia (PHP, Cecil, MIT, CPL, W3C, etc.) Open source : un fonctionnement communautaire ● La « pyramide » Linux : développeurs / 'maintainers' / chefs de projet sys USB net (...) L. Torvalds / A. Morton ● Système de «patchs» : publics, signés, discutés, soumis, (approuvés) ● Versions stables régulières et archivées (mirroirs) ● Système de «paquets» permettant la cohérence des OS ● Mode de fonctionnement repris par la plupart des distributions basées sur Linux ainsi que leurs « filles » : Debian → Ubuntu, Slackware → Zenwalk, RedHat → Fedora, etc. ● Idem pour les logiciels (xfce/gnome/kde, OOo, Gimp, Firefox, etc.) Le monde open source : un immense agrégat de communautés... OS OS OS Projets GNU OS OS OS Noyau OS OS OS Noyau OS OS Projets BSD Programme open source Programme propriétaire Système OS d'exploitation Quid des logiciels médicaux ? Petit tour du monde de l'open source médical à partir d'une liste proposée par Wikipédia. 1. Logiciels médicaux francophones : MedinTux ● Petite communauté depuis 2005 (marseille), licence CeCiLL ● DMI cabinet / hôpital - objectif = ergonomie ● Programmes serveurs et clients, consultation web possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Lista Ofrecida Por Mashe De Forobeta. Visita Mi Blog Como Agradecimiento :P Y Pon E Me Gusta En Forobeta!
    Lista ofrecida por mashe de forobeta. Visita mi blog como agradecimiento :P Y pon e Me Gusta en Forobeta! http://mashet.com/ Seguime en Twitter si queres tambien y avisame que sos de Forobeta y voy a evalu ar si te sigo o no.. >>@mashet NO ABUSEN Y SIGAN LOS CONSEJOS DEL THREAD! http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/04/09/supernaturalcrimefightinghasanewname anditssolomonstone/ http://htmlgiant.com/?p=7408 http://mootools.net/blog/2009/04/01/anewnameformootools/ http://freemovement.wordpress.com/2009/02/11/rlctochangename/ http://www.mattheaton.com/?p=14 http://www.webhostingsearch.com/blog/noavailabledomainnames068 http://findportablesolarpower.com/updatesandnews/worldresponsesearthhour2009 / http://www.neuescurriculum.org/nc/?p=12 http://www.ybointeractive.com/blog/2008/09/18/thewrongwaytochooseadomain name/ http://www.marcozehe.de/2008/02/29/easyariatip1usingariarequired/ http://www.universetoday.com/2009/03/16/europesclimatesatellitefailstoleave pad/ http://blogs.sjr.com/editor/index.php/2009/03/27/touchinganerveresponsesto acolumn/ http://blog.privcom.gc.ca/index.php/2008/03/18/yourcreativejuicesrequired/ http://www.taiaiake.com/27 http://www.deadmilkmen.com/2007/08/24/leaveusaloan/ http://www.techgadgets.in/household/2007/06/roboamassagingchairresponsesto yourvoice/ http://blog.swishzone.com/?p=1095 http://www.lorenzogil.com/blog/2009/01/18/mappinginheritancetoardbmswithst ormandlazrdelegates/ http://www.venganza.org/about/openletter/responses/ http://www.middleclassforum.org/?p=405 http://flavio.castelli.name/qjson_qt_json_library http://www.razorit.com/designers_central/howtochooseadomainnameforapree
    [Show full text]
  • Adopting an Open Source Hospital Information System to Manage Healthcare Institutions
    LIFE: International Journal of Health and Life-Sciences ISSN 2454-5872 Bouidi et al., 2017 Volume 3 Issue 3, pp. 38-57 Date of Publication: 18th December 2017 DOI-https://dx.doi.org/10.20319/lijhls.2017.33.3857 This paper can be cited as: Bouidi, Y, Azzouzi Idrissi, M & Rais, N. (2017). Adopting an Open Source Hospital Information System to Manage Healthcare Institutions. LIFE: International Journal of Health and Life-Sciences, 3(3), 38-57. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, PO Box 1866, Mountain View, CA 94042, USA. ADOPTING AN OPEN SOURCE HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEM TO MANAGE HEALTHCARE INSTITUTIONS Youssef Bouidi Laboratory of Informatics, Modeling and Systems (LIMS), University of Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdallah (USMBA), Fez, Morocco [email protected] Mostafa Azzouzi Idrissi Laboratory of Informatics, Modeling and Systems (LIMS), University of Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdallah (USMBA), Fez, Morocco [email protected] Noureddine Rais Laboratory of Informatics, Modeling and Systems (LIMS), University of Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdallah (USMBA), Fez, Morocco [email protected] Abstract Our paper is a comparative study of different Open Source Hospital Information Systems (OSHISs). We chose open source because of problems in healthcare management like budget, resources and computerization. A literature review did not allow us to find a similar comparison, which explains the great interest of our study. Firstly, we retrieved nine OSHISs: MediBoard, OpenEMR, OpenMRS, OpenHospital, HospitalOS, PatientOS, Care2x, MedinTux and HOSxP.
    [Show full text]
  • Phr) to Electronic Health Record (Ehr
    International Journal of Latest Trends in Engineering and Technology Special Issue SACAIM 2016, pp. 106-114 e-ISSN:2278-621X WELLNESS DATA SHARING FROM PERSONAL HEALTH RECORD (PHR) TO ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD (EHR) Sarita Pais1 and Xiaoci Xu2 Abstract- Patients have the option to maintain their health data and medical information in a Personal Health Record (PHR) system. However health professionals use different systems such as Electronic Health Record (EHR) to manage their patients' medical records. PHR systems provide greater benefits when integrated with EHR systems. The data and its format are different in the two systems. Hence this research project looks for solutions for data exchange between PHR and EHR systems. This research project followed design science research methodology to build an ecosystem and evaluate it through experiments using hypothetical data. Existing open source PHR and EHR systems were evaluated and literature related to PHR and EHR were reviewed in this project. HL7 is an international standard which is used for transferring health data between medical systems. This project set up the ecosystem using Microsoft HealthVault and OpenMRS. The ecosystem readthe data file containing blood glucose readings and converted the data into a format which Microsoft HealthVault can accept. Microsoft HealthVault exports the data in CCD/CCR data format. The ecosystem converted CCD/CCR data to CDA data format in OpenMRS. The ecosystem allowed the patient to share self- managed health data with health professionals and provided them with the patient’s background health data enabling better consultation with patients. The findings of this project is a proof of concept which can demonstrate that patient managed health data from PHR system can be integrated into EHR system.
    [Show full text]
  • Recommendations on Electronic Medical Records Standards in India
    Report of Sub-Group Task II (data connectivity) with reports of Sub-Group Task I (standards) and Sub-Group Task III (data ownership) incorporated Recommendations On Electronic Medical Records Standards In India Version 2.0 October 2012 Recommendations of EMR Standards Committee, constituted by an order of Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India 1 Sub-Group Task I (Standards) Members: 1. Prof. Dr. S.V. Mani, TCS, Group Head, Sub-Group Task I 2. Dr. R.R. Sudhir, Shankar Netralaya 3. Ms. Kala Rao, TCS 4. Dr. Ashok Kumar, CBHI 5. Ms. Jyoti Vij , FICCI 6. Dr. Sameer A. Khan, Fortis Hospital Sub-Group Task II (Data Connectivity) Members: 1. Mr. B S Bedi, Adviser, CDAC, Group Head, Sub-Group Task II 2. Dr. Thanga Prabhu, Clinical Director, GE India, Member 3. Dr. Supten Sarbadhikari: Prof, Health Informatics, Coimbatore, Member 4. Mr. Chayan Kanti Dhar, National Informatics Center 5. Mr. Gaur Sundar, Project Manager, Medical Informatics Group, CDAC (Pune), 6. Dr. S. B. Bhattacharyya, Health Informatics Consultant, Ex-President, IAMI Sub-Group Task III (Data Ownership) Members: 1. Prof. Saroj K. Mishra ,SGPGI , Lucknow , Group Head, Sub-Group Task III 2. Prof. Indrajit Bhattacharya , IIHMR, New Delhi 3. Prof. Sita Naik, MCI 4. Dr. Karanveer Singh, Sir Gangaram Hospital 5. Dr. Naveen Jain, CDAC 6. Dr. Arun Bal 7 . Mr. Madhu Aravind, Healthhiway N. B. This document incorporates the recommendations by the various Sub-Groups and consolidated into one document for easy reference. As there was considerable overlap in the areas of recommendations of sub-group Task I responsible for standards and sub-group Task II responsible for data connectivity, most of the recommendations were made primarily by the members of task group II in close consultation with the chairman of sub-group Task I Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Implementing an Open Source EMR in a Nursing Informatics Course
    Implementing an Open Source EMR in a Nursing Informatics Course Nina Multak Emad Khazraee Michelle Rogers Prudence Dalrymple [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Drexel University Abstract Electronic medical record (EMR) systems are being implemented widely in hospital and office based settings. This technology is becoming a standard documentation modality for inpatient and outpatient clinical settings. While practicing clinicians have learned to use these systems with the benefit of institutional or practice based training, the educational benefit of providing EMR training to students prior to their exposure to the clinical environment has not been widely explored. This preliminary research evaluated multiple EMR systems for educational use in a nursing school curriculum. EMR training including classroom lectures, computer based training sessions and practice with interdisciplinary medical simulation are incorporated in this educational program, providing students access to an EMR system before using one with actual patients. The ADDIE model of systemic instructional design was utilized for this study. Additionally, deliberate practice, an evidence-based construct grounded in information processing and behavioral theories of skill acquisition and maintenance guided the design of this study. Preliminary results reveal a high level of learner interest and satisfaction with the training methodology. Further exploration of EMR systems and the impact this component has on nursing education and practice are planned. Keywords: education, EMR, simulation, documentation Introduction The Institute of Medicine Committee on Data Standards for Patient Safety reports evidence that improved clinical efficiencies, patient safety, and quality care outcomes can be promoted by having an effectively structured and implemented EMR1.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing an Emr Training Unit for Nursing and Medical Students
    TALLINN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY Faculty of Information Technology Department of Health Technologies Lingling Yin 156371YVEM DEVELOPING AN EMR TRAINING UNIT FOR NURSING AND MEDICAL STUDENTS Master’s thesis Supervisor: Peeter Ross, MD, PhD Chair of Healthcare Technology Co-supervisor: Alexander Bejan, M.Sc. Furtwangen University, Germany Academic staff Tallinn 2018 TALLINNA TEHNIKAÜLIKOOL Infotehnoloogia teaduskond Tervisetehnoloogiate instituut Lingling Yin 156371YVEM ÕENDUS- JA ARSTITEADUSÕPILASTE EMR SÜSTEEMI TREENINGÜKSUSE VÄLJATÖÖTAMINE Magistritöö Juhendaja: Peeter Ross, MD, PhD Tervishoiutehnoloogia juhataja Kaasjuhendaja: Alexander Bejan, M.Sc. Furtwangeni Ülikool, Saksamaa Akadeemiline personal Tallinn 2018 Author’s declaration of originality I hereby certify that I am the sole author of this thesis. All the used materials, references to the literature and the work of others have been referred to. This thesis has not been presented for examination anywhere else. Author: Lingling Yin 09.01.2018 3 Abstract The aim of this master thesis is to investigate the feasibility of using Open Source EMR systems in order to teach nursing and medical students EMRS practical skills that are needed in their future job. The thesis consists of two main parts; selecting a suitable Open Source EMRS and developing an instructional unit for training students in order to use the EMRS. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) was used to select a suitable Open Source EMRS. The training unit uses eLearning, problem-based learning, and case study to optimize the teaching methods. The potential learning objectives are defined by using the Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy method. In the later parts, grading rubrics are created for the evaluation of the students’ learning outcomes, while the quantitative and qualitative data analysis methods are applied to the evaluation of the two questionnaires.
    [Show full text]