Don't Accuse Me of Obsessing Over Clinton! Now About Those Emails… (Caitlin Macneal)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Don't Accuse Me of Obsessing Over Clinton! Now About Those Emails… (Caitlin Macneal) The Atlantic: Loretta Lynch Can't Escape the Clinton Emails (Priscilla Alvarez, Nora Kelly) TPM: Gohmert: Don't Accuse Me Of Obsessing Over Clinton! Now About Those Emails… (Caitlin Macneal) _______________ AP: AG Lynch Defends Decision on Clinton Email Inquiry (Eric Tucker, Erica Werner) http://bigstory.ap.org/article/8d48f80b0cc042669bc6063848cb3982/lynch-face-questions- policing-clinton-investigation Attorney General Loretta Lynch steadfastly defended her decision theto Hillaryclose Clinton email investigation without criminal charges, insisting Tuesday that she simply accepted the unanimous recommendation of careerFBI investigators and attorneys. "I "I accepted that recommendation. I saw no reasonnot to accept Lynchit," told the House Judiciary Committee. "The matter was handled like any" other matter. The panel's chairman, Rep. Bob Goodlatte, strenuouslyR-Va.,criticized Lynch over her decision, charging that "does it not seem to be a responsible wayyour to constitutionally uphold sworn oath." "Secretary Clinton's'extreme carelessness' possiblyjeopardized the safetyand security of our citizens and nation," Goodlatte said.'extreme "Her carelessness' suggests she cannot be trusted with the nation's most sensitive "secrets. The election-year hearing played out amid a roiling national debate over police violence, and committee Democrats repeatedly tried to conversationturn the to that issueand others as they criticized Republicans for dwelling Democrats'on the likely presidential nominee andemail her practices. Republicans were furious last weekthat theFBI decided not to recommendcharges against Clinton over her handlingclassified of information when she relied on a private email server during her tenure as secretary of state. "Rome is burning, there is blood on manythe streetsAmerican ofcities and we are beating this email horse to death," said Rep. Cedric Richmond, D-La. But Republicans kept focusthe on Clinton, totrying draw Lynch out on whether Clinton lied to the public or to Congress, and on a couple turningof occasions the conversation to then- president Bill Clinton's impeachment proceedings 18years ago. "Are you aware that Hillary Clinton has liedrepeatedly to the public herabout emails andemail servers?" Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, asked.you "Areaware of that?" Document ID: 0.7.7995.5049 20170503 - 0002453 Republicans on Mondayformally asked the Justice Department to investigate whether Clinton perjured herself in earlier testimony a to congressional committee investigating the Benghazi, Libya, attacks that killedfour Americans while Clinton was ofsecretary state. Clinton has said she did notsend or receive emails classifiedmarked when she sent them, thatclaims FBI Director James Comeycontradicted last week. Comey also said Clinton was "extremelycareless" in her handling of classified emails on a private server, but said there was no evidenceshe or aidesherthat intendedto violate laws governing classifiedactions, and thereforereasonable no prosecutor could bring case.a Comey testified in detail inown his appearance before Congress lastand week, Lynch repeatedly referred Republicans to the FBI director's testimony, getrefusing drawn tointo debating Clinton's conduct or the facts of the case. That approach irritatedcommittee Republicans. At one Goodlattepoint interrupted the hearing to admonish Lynch for refusing to answer, accusingher of "abdicationan ofyour responsibility." Lynch did say, in response to questioningLamar from Smith,Rep. R-Texas, that she had never discussed Clinton's email practiceswith either HillaryBill or Clinton, and she also said she had not discussed with eitherof them a position in the Hillary Clinton administration. "No conversation in that nature at all," she said. She reiterated that a conversationbrief she had with Bill Clinton at airportthe Phoenixlast month, after he sawairplane her and asked to board to wasgreet social her,in nature and"there was nothingabout any investigations or any specific" Instead cases. the former president spoke "at length" about grandchildren,his Lynch said. Goodlatte questioned whyLynch hadn't recused herself after that Lynchmeeting. said therewas no need to. Butreiterated she that concernsher over how the meetingcould be perceived had led her to announce she would accept the recommendation of teamher investigativein the Hillary Clinton case. That decision was intended to remove ofthe politicalspecter interference,but Republicans argued itthe otherway Tuesday, charging that unusualthe step of announcing ahead of time that she would take her team's recommendation reinforced the perception of special treatment for Clinton. "I "I think your actions made worse,it I really do," said Rep. Jordan,Jim R-Ohio. Lynch touched on enforcementlaw and policing issues including last week's sniper shooting of five police officers in Dallas by a suspect who said he officers.wanted toThat kill white followed police killingsof black men near. Paul,St Minnesota, and in BatonLouisiana. Rouge, The nation's"sense of safety has been shaken by the series of devastating events that rocked our nation last week,"Lynch said. # # # Document ID: 0.7.7995.5049 20170503 - 0002454 Reuters: U.S. AttorneyGeneral Deflects Lawmakers' Questions Clinton on Emails (Julia Harte) http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-clinton-emails-idUSKCN0ZS1VI The top .U.S law enforcement official, under questioning from Republicansat a congressional hearing on Tuesday, shedno new light on the Justice Department's decision not to prosecute Hillary Clinton over handlingher of sensitive emails. Attorney General Loretta Lynch deflected questions about the department's inquiry into Clinton's use of a private email server while she was secretary of state, an issue that has hounded her campaign for the Democratic presidential nomination. Republicans grilledLynch at the House of Representatives committee hearing over Justice's decision not to charge Clinton, the presumptive Democratic nominee for the Nov. 8 election. "Lynch has no intention of answeringeven themost... basic questions about the legal elements the government is obligated to prove in a criminal prosecution," Judiciary said Committee House Chairman Bob Goodlatte, a Republican. Democratic lawmakers atthe hearing largely avoided the subject,Lynch askingabout gun control and policingreforms. Lynch referred questions about the department's decision to an FBI-led investigative team that recommended not bringing charges. She wassaid "extremelyshe proud" of the team's work, testifying one weekafter the FBI closed year-longits probe. The emails case is a favorite target for presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump, as well as otherRepublican politicians. Goodlatte and Republican Representative Jason Chaffetzasked the JusticeDepartment on Monday to investigatewhether Clinton committed perjury in testimonyCongress to about the emails. FBI Director James Comey toldcongressional a hearing last week that he recommended the department not charge Clinton. He said this was because the FBI lacked sufficient evidence that she acted with bad intent.He added that any employeesof his who handledemails the way Clinton did could be subject to dismissal or loss of security clearance. Democratic lawmakers on the committeeLynch asked about efforts to tightencontrol gun in the wake of shootings of clubgoers and police in Orlando and as Dallas,waysreduce asto wellfatal police shootings of unarmed African Americansamid ongoing protests over the issue. Representative Jerry Nadler askedLynch what shethought of the pro-gun rightshat adage“the t only thing that can stop a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun” in light of the fact that the Dallas police officers shot last week were armed. Document ID: 0.7.7995.5049 20170503 - 0002455 “The issue, as usual, doesn’t really lend itself well to aphorisms andh short statements,” Lync replied. # # # New York Times: House Panel Questions Loretta Lynch on Hillary Clinton’s Emails (Eric Lichtblau) http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/13/us/politics/loretta-lynch-testify-hillary-clinton- email.html Under fire from Republicans for closing the investigation on ’s Hillaryemails, ClintonAttorney General Loretta E. Lynch told lawmakersTuesday that she was “extremely proud” of the yearlong investigation, but she frustrated her interrogators by refusing to talk about the investigation’s details or conclusions. The F.B.I. director, James B. Comey, “has chosen to providets” detailedon the statemen investigation, Ms. Lynch noted tersely as she testified before the House Judiciary Committee, but she would not. Again and again, she deflected questions about crucial details that went into the decision not to bring chargescase. in the She also defended her decision not to recuse herself from the case even after her meeting on a tarmac in Phoenix with former President Bill Clinton. She deferred to the F.B.I. and experienced prosecutors, she said, and saw no need to step out of the case completely before accepting their recommendations. Republicans were not swayed. While no charges wereMr. brought,Comey’s remarkably public comments last week on Mrs. Clinton’s mishandling of classified material on her email server, said RepresentativeBob Goodlatte of Virginia, the chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, amounted to “a public indictment of her conduct and character.” Ms. Lynch heard sharp criticism from Republican lawmakers not only about the decision to close the investigation, but also about her meeting days earlier with Mr. Clinton. She
Recommended publications
  • Gore Vice Presidential Records in Response to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Requests Listed in Attachment A
    VIA EMAIL (LM 2019-023) December 18, 2018 The Honorable Pat A. Cipollone Counsel to the President The White House Washington, D.C. 20502 Dear Mr. Cipollone: In accordance with the requirements of the Presidential Records Act (PRA), as amended, 44 U.S.C. §§2201-2209, this letter constitutes a formal notice from the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) to the incumbent President of our intent to open Gore Vice Presidential records in response to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests listed in Attachment A. These records, consisting of 453 textual pages, 217 photographs, and three email messages, have been reviewed for all applicable FOIA exemptions, resulting in 55 pages and 13 photographs restricted in whole and five pages restricted in part. NARA is proposing to open the remaining 393 pages, 204 photographs, and three email messages in whole and five pages in part. A copy of any records proposed for release under this notice will be provided to you upon your request. We are also concurrently informing former Vice President Gore’s representative, Beth Geer, and former President Clinton’s representative, Bruce Lindsey, of our intent to release these records. Pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 2208(a), NARA will release the records 60 working days from the date of this letter, which is March 18, 2019, unless the former President, former Vice President, or incumbent President requests a one-time extension of an additional 30 working days or if the former or incumbent President asserts a constitutionally based privilege, in accordance with 44 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Clinton Presidential Records in Response to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Requests Listed in Attachment A
    VIA EMAIL (LM 2018-071) May 8, 2018 The Honorable Donald F. McGahn, II Counsel to the President The White House Washington, D.C. 20502 Dear Mr. McGahn: In accordance with the requirements of the Presidential Records Act (PRA), as amended, 44 U.S.C. §§2201-2209, this letter constitutes a formal notice from the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) to the incumbent President of our intent to open Clinton Presidential records in response to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests listed in Attachment A. These records, consisting of 46,173 pages, have been reviewed for all applicable FOIA exemptions, resulting in 1,741 pages restricted in whole or in part. NARA is proposing to open the remaining 44,432 pages. A copy of any records proposed for release under this notice will be provided to you upon your request. We are also concurrently informing former President Clinton’s representative, Bruce Lindsey, of our intent to release these records. Pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 2208(a), NARA will release the records 60 working days from the date of this letter, which is August 2, 2018, unless the former or incumbent President requests a one-time extension of an additional 30 working days or asserts a constitutionally based privilege, in accordance with 44 U.S.C. 2208(b)-(d). Please let us know if you are able to complete your review before the expiration of the 60 working day period. Pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 2208(a)(1)(B), we will make this notice available to the public on the NARA website.
    [Show full text]
  • The W Illiam J. C Linton P Residential Center
    WILLIAM J. CLINTON PRESIDENTIAL CENTER A Walk with President Clinton www.clintonpresidentialcenter.org Audio tours narrated by CLINTON FOUNDATION Choctaw Station President Clinton can 501-370-8000 tel • 501-375-0512 fax be purchased for an www.clintonfoundation.org additional $3.00. CLINTON LIBRARY AND MUSEUM 501-374-4242 tel • 501-244-2883 fax www.clintonlibrary.gov BECOME A MEMBER! Monday to Saturday: 9:00 a.m.–5:00 p.m. With your membership, you support the Center’s Sunday: 1:00 p.m.–5:00 p.m. dynamic educational programming, unique temporary Closed Thanksgiving, Christmas, and New Year’s Day exhibits, compelling lectures, and much more. Benefits include: CLINTON MUSEUM STORE • Free admission to the Clinton Presidential Library 610 President Clinton Avenue • Little Rock, AR 72201 and all National Archives and Records Administration 501-748-0400 tel • 501-748-0417 fax Presidential Libraries www.clintonmuseumstore.com • Guest admission passes Monday to Saturday: 10:00 a.m.–5:30 p.m. • A discount at the Clinton Museum Store and Forty Two Sunday: 2:00 p.m.–5:30 p.m. • Invitations to special events Closed Thanksgiving, Christmas, and New Year’s Day Free shuttle to and from the Center Thank you for your generosity and on-going support. Please visit Visitor and Membership Services for more FORTY TWO, ON-SITE FULL-SERVICE RESTAURANT information or visit clintonpresidentialcenter.org. 501-537-0042 tel www.dineatfortytwo.com Monday to Friday: 11:00 a.m.–2:00 p.m. COFFEE BAR AT 42 Clinton Monday to Friday: 9:00 a.m –4:00 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Picking the Vice President
    Picking the Vice President Elaine C. Kamarck Brookings Institution Press Washington, D.C. Contents Introduction 4 1 The Balancing Model 6 The Vice Presidency as an “Arranged Marriage” 2 Breaking the Mold 14 From Arranged Marriages to Love Matches 3 The Partnership Model in Action 20 Al Gore Dick Cheney Joe Biden 4 Conclusion 33 Copyright 36 Introduction Throughout history, the vice president has been a pretty forlorn character, not unlike the fictional vice president Julia Louis-Dreyfus plays in the HBO seriesVEEP . In the first episode, Vice President Selina Meyer keeps asking her secretary whether the president has called. He hasn’t. She then walks into a U.S. senator’s office and asks of her old colleague, “What have I been missing here?” Without looking up from her computer, the senator responds, “Power.” Until recently, vice presidents were not very interesting nor was the relationship between presidents and their vice presidents very consequential—and for good reason. Historically, vice presidents have been understudies, have often been disliked or even despised by the president they served, and have been used by political parties, derided by journalists, and ridiculed by the public. The job of vice president has been so peripheral that VPs themselves have even made fun of the office. That’s because from the beginning of the nineteenth century until the last decade of the twentieth century, most vice presidents were chosen to “balance” the ticket. The balance in question could be geographic—a northern presidential candidate like John F. Kennedy of Massachusetts picked a southerner like Lyndon B.
    [Show full text]
  • For Student Success
    TRANSFORMING School Environments OUR VISION For Student Success Weaving SKILLS ROPES Relationships 2018 Annual Report Practices to Help All Students Our Vision for Student Success City Year has always been about nurturing and developing young people, from the talented students we serve to our dedicated AmeriCorps members. We put this commitment to work through service in schools across the country. Every day, our AmeriCorps members help students to develop the skills and mindsets needed to thrive in school and in life, while they themselves acquire valuable professional experience that prepares them to be leaders in their careers and communities. We believe that all students can succeed. Supporting the success of our students goes far beyond just making sure they know how to add fractions or write a persuasive essay—students also need to know how to work in teams, how to problem solve and how to work toward a goal. City Year AmeriCorps members model these behaviors and mindsets for students while partnering with teachers and schools to create supportive learning environments where students feel a sense of belonging and agency as they develop the social, emotional and academic skills that will help them succeed in and out of school. When our children succeed, we all benefit. From Our Leadership Table of Contents At City Year, we are committed to partnering Our 2018 Annual Report tells the story of how 2 What We Do 25 Campaign Feature: with teachers, parents, schools and school City Year AmeriCorps members help students 4 How Students Learn Jeannie & Jonathan Lavine districts, and communities to ensure that all build a wide range of academic and social- 26 National Corporate Partners children have access to a quality education that emotional skills to help them succeed in school 6 Alumni Profile: Andrea Encarnacao Martin 28 enables them to reach their potential, develop and beyond.
    [Show full text]
  • How Campaign Songs Sold the Image of Presidential Candidates
    University of Central Florida STARS Honors Undergraduate Theses UCF Theses and Dissertations 2019 Music and the Presidency: How Campaign Songs Sold the Image of Presidential Candidates Gary M. Bogers University of Central Florida Part of the Music Commons, and the United States History Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/honorstheses University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the UCF Theses and Dissertations at STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Undergraduate Theses by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Recommended Citation Bogers, Gary M., "Music and the Presidency: How Campaign Songs Sold the Image of Presidential Candidates" (2019). Honors Undergraduate Theses. 511. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/honorstheses/511 MUSIC AND THE PRESIDENCY: HOW CAMPAIGN SONGS SOLD THE IMAGE OF PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES by GARY MICHAEL BOGERS JR. A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Honors in the Major Program in Music Performance in the College of Arts and Humanities and in The Burnett Honors College at the University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Spring Term, 2019 Thesis Chair: Dr. Scott Warfield Co-chairs: Dr. Alexander Burtzos & Dr. Joe Gennaro ©2019 Gary Michael Bogers Jr. ii ABSTRACT In this thesis, I will discuss the importance of campaign songs and how they were used throughout three distinctly different U.S. presidential elections: the 1960 campaign of Senator John Fitzgerald Kennedy against Vice President Richard Milhouse Nixon, the 1984 reelection campaign of President Ronald Wilson Reagan against Vice President Walter Frederick Mondale, and the 2008 campaign of Senator Barack Hussein Obama against Senator John Sidney McCain.
    [Show full text]
  • An Examination of the Call to Censure the President
    S. HRG. 109–524 AN EXAMINATION OF THE CALL TO CENSURE THE PRESIDENT HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED NINTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION MARCH 31, 2006 Serial No. J–109–66 Printed for the use of the Committee on the Judiciary ( U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 28–341 PDF WASHINGTON : 2006 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate 0ct 09 2002 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 028341 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 S:\GPO\HEARINGS\28341.TXT SJUD4 PsN: CMORC COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania, Chairman ORRIN G. HATCH, Utah PATRICK J. LEAHY, Vermont CHARLES E. GRASSLEY, Iowa EDWARD M. KENNEDY, Massachusetts JON KYL, Arizona JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., Delaware MIKE DEWINE, Ohio HERBERT KOHL, Wisconsin JEFF SESSIONS, Alabama DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California LINDSEY O. GRAHAM, South Carolina RUSSELL D. FEINGOLD, Wisconsin JOHN CORNYN, Texas CHARLES E. SCHUMER, New York SAM BROWNBACK, Kansas RICHARD J. DURBIN, Illinois TOM COBURN, Oklahoma MICHAEL O’NEILL, Chief Counsel and Staff Director BRUCE A. COHEN, Democratic Chief Counsel and Staff Director (II) VerDate 0ct 09 2002 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 028341 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 S:\GPO\HEARINGS\28341.TXT SJUD4 PsN: CMORC C O N T E N T S STATEMENTS OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS Page Cornyn, Hon. John, a U.S. Senator from the State of Texas ..............................
    [Show full text]
  • Youtube James Comey Full Testimony
    Youtube James Comey Full Testimony Sylvan usually trail anyway or tusks doucely when penetralian Gabe extemporised false and pliably. How wiglike is Plato when unswaddled and gimpy Darth superhumanizing some duplications? Stormless Renault press abruptly. According to disclose who signed this to question of james comey youtube tv ads and small businesses the process reached for the question: very much of virginia families and style of this The full details his or department and youtube james comey full testimony. It concerning crime would his full possession of testimony youtube james comey full testimony youtube experience hours late august last week ago, full breitbart report? Using a household name? Comey testifies before and walk away some dating can. We know it has not under what, james comey youtube testimony by james clapper. Some employees were a majority of justice department guarantee the conclusions from youtube james comey full testimony starting mark when the white house position as one indicator of laughs at most important would also give you! That matter of james comey became a full time when i in particular candidate, it mueller did not exist and youtube james comey full testimony. Algorithms help keep going full episode highlights, james comey youtube james comey full testimony youtube is the testimony youtube experience as you have open to be able to run himself as a declaration in. Former director james comey youtube james comey full testimony. Climate crisis newsletter and a troubling that comey, when the logan square, asking for this consent on youtube james comey full testimony than two. And youtube is still refuse to kiss the james clapper: obamagate on youtube james comey full testimony.
    [Show full text]
  • Protecting Special Counsel Robert Mueller's Investigation
    Protecting Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s Investigation Background: Calls for a special prosecutor to investigate the Russian hacking of the 2016 election reached fever pitch after Trump fired FBI Director James Comey and then admitted it was because of the Russia investigation. Several months earlier, after public revelations that he had lied to the Senate Judiciary Committee about conversations he’d had with the Russian ambassador as a member of the Trump campaign, Attorney General Jeff Sessions had recused himself from any investigations related to Russia and the election. Therefore, the responsibility for naming a special counsel fell to Deputy AG Rod Rosenstein, who, on May 17th named former FBI Director, Robert Mueller. Mueller has hired a crack team of legal experts, issued subpoenas, and impaneled multiple grand juries in his probe into all aspects of Russian interference in our elections – including potential Trump campaign collusion -- as well as other legal matters arising in the course of that investigation. Trump and his allies have repeatedly attacked Mueller’s investigation, raising concerns that he might fire Mueller and/or obstruct the investigation in other ways. Key points: The public, by a margin of more than 2-to-1, supports the Mueller investigation, as do many Republicans and Democrats in Congress. A recent poll shows that of those following the Russia scandal closely, nearly two-thirds (65%) now think that members of his campaign colluded with Russia to help sway the November election. Both the House Speaker and the Senate Majority Leader have defended Mr. Mueller when the issue of his removal has come up.
    [Show full text]
  • Trump's Disinformation 'Magaphone'. Consequences, First Lessons and Outlook
    BRIEFING Trump's disinformation 'magaphone' Consequences, first lessons and outlook SUMMARY The deadly insurrection at the US Capitol on 6 January 2021 was a significant cautionary example of the offline effects of online disinformation and conspiracy theories. The historic democratic crisis this has sparked − adding to a number of other historic crises the US is currently battling − provides valuable lessons not only for the United States, but also for Europe and the democratic world. The US presidential election and its aftermath saw domestic disinformation emerging as a more visible immediate threat than disinformation by third countries. While political violence has been the most tangible physical effect of manipulative information, corrosive conspiracy theories have moved from the fringes to the heart of political debate, normalising extremist rhetoric. At the same time, recent developments have confirmed that the lines between domestic and foreign attempts to undermine democracy are increasingly blurred. While the perceived weaknesses in democratic systems are − unsurprisingly − celebrated as a victory for authoritarian state actors, links between foreign interference and domestic terrorism are under growing scrutiny. The question of how to depolarise US society − one of a long list of challenges facing the Biden Administration − is tied to the polarised media environment. The crackdown by major social media platforms on Donald Trump and his supporters has prompted far-right groups to abandon the established information ecosystem to join right-wing social media. This could further accelerate the ongoing fragmentation of the US infosphere, cementing the trend towards separate realities. Ahead of the proposed Democracy Summit − a key objective of the Biden Administration − tempering the 'sword of democracy' has risen to the top of the agenda on both sides of the Atlantic.
    [Show full text]
  • Dear Virginians, Five Generations Ago, My Ancestors Were Freed from the Shackles of Slavery
    REFORMING OUR CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM Dear Virginians, Five generations ago, my ancestors were freed from the shackles of slavery. Just two generations ago, my grandfather, one of Virginia’s first Black lawyers, was forced by Jim Crow to obtain his law degree in the north. And my father was one of the first to integrate his elementary school in 1960. As I travel throughout the Commonwealth and stand as an elected official in the former capital of the Confederacy, I often wonder how my ancestors would feel, and what they would think, about their descendant who has the opportunity to be Virginia’s first Black Attorney General. I’m running for Attorney General because we’ve made progress in building a more fair and equitable Virginia, but we all know we have not come far enough. The vestiges of slavery and Jim Crow live on in our Commonwealth’s criminal code, in our judicial system, and in our policing. They criminalize Black and Brown communities and make every Virginian less safe. In order to embrace the new Virginia decade, we must build a justice system that works for everybody in our Commonwealth, not just a select few. We have arrived at a true moment of opportunity in our country and in our Commonwealth. We must elect leaders who will rise to that moment and seize the chance to create real change in our justice system, rather than continuing with those who have proven time and time again that they will only do the bare minimum to get by. For his entire career, Mark Herring has shown that he will follow when he has to, but he will not lead.
    [Show full text]
  • February 21, 2010 Transcript
    © 2010, CBS Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved. PLEASE CREDIT ANY QUOTES OR EXCERPTS FROM THIS CBS TELEVISION PROGRAM TO "CBS NEWS' FACE THE NATION." February 21, 2010 Transcript GUEST: GEN. COLIN POWELL Former Secretary of State MODERATOR/ HOST: Mr. BOB SCHIEFFER CBS News This is a rush transcript provided for the information and convenience of the press. Accuracy is not guaranteed. In case of doubt, please check with FACE THE NATION - CBS NEWS (202) 457-4481 TRANSCRIPT BOB SCHIEFFER: Today on FACE THE NATION, an exclusive interview with Colin Powell. He holds a unique place in American life: soldier, diplomat, advisor to both Republican and Democratic Presidents. What does he make of the Washington gridlock? Does he think the system is broken? What would he do to fix it? We'll ask him. Then I'll have a personal thought on why Washington doesn't listen, or does it? It's all next on FACE THE NATION. ANNOUNCER: FACE THE NATION with CBS News chief Washington correspondent Bob Schieffer. And now, from CBS News in Washington, Bob Schieffer. BOB SCHIEFFER: And good morning again. The former secretary of state, the former chairman of the joint chiefs is in the studio with us this morning. General, you do bring a unique perspective to this. You're a Republican but you have held high- level positions under both Republicans and Democrats. And when you announced that you were voting for Barack Obama in 2008, it really got the nation's attention. Here's part of what you said. COLIN POWELL (Former Secretary of State) (Meet the Press, October 19, 2008): Because of his ability to inspire, because of the inclusive nature of his campaign, because he is reaching out all across America, he has both style and substance, he has met the standard of being a successful President, being an exceptional President.
    [Show full text]