DOCSLIB.ORG

Luoma-Aho Kansitettavaksi.Rtf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Luoma-Aho Kansitettavaksi.Rtf Europe as a Living Organism: Organicist Symbolism and Political Subjectivity in the New Europe Mika Luoma-aho A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Politics at the University of Newcastle upon Tyne September, 2002 Abstract This dissertation is a reading of organicist symbolism in the identification of Europe as a political entity after the Cold War. It begins by criticising theories of European integration for their marginalisation of the political dimension of the integration process. Then, it explicates Carl Schmitt’s conception of political subjectivity as a combination of willingness and ability to distinguish friends from enemies in territorial terms, and elaborates this conception into a perspective on the social construction of the EU as a political subject in and of Europe. It then outlines a history of an organicist political theory that has contributed in the social construction of territorial political entities from the ancients to late modernity. The dissertation consists of two empirical chapters, which explicate organicist metaphors in the identification of both willingness and ability of the EU to act as the political subject in and of Europe. The first one explicates the use of the metaphor of disease in the context of the conflict in the former Yugoslavia. The second one explicates the image of Europe as a “political giant” with a “defence arm” in the context of the 1990-1991 intergovernmental conference on political union. The dissertation concludes by noting the apparent failure of the organicist symbolism in the European construction, and argues that if Europe is wanted or needed as a political unit or reference, it needs to be re-symbolised and the old symbols need to be replaced. ii Table of Contents ABSTRACT II TABLE OF CONTENTS III ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS V 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 The Newest Europe 6 1.2 Critique of Rational Integration 12 1.3 Study of Two Political Contexts 22 1.4 Outline of Study 25 2 CARL SCHMITT AND POLITICAL SUBJECTIVITY 29 2.1 Brief Intellectual History 29 2.2 Dimensions of the Political 31 2.3 Defence of the Weimar State 35 2.4 Construction of a European Großraum 39 2.5 The Politics of Political Subjectivity 50 3 POLITICAL THEORY OF THE BODY AND EUROPE 57 3.1 Singularity and Symbolism 57 3.2 History of an Idea 63 3.3 European Body Politic 72 3.4 The Geopolitics of Depoliticisation 90 iii 4 THE ENEMY WITHIN: BALKAN WAR AND THE PATHOLOGY OF NATIONALISM 94 4.1 Europe as a Whole 94 4.2 Securitising the New Europe 98 4.3 Malignant Nationalism 110 4.4 Metastatic Nationalism 123 4.5 Logos of Integration 134 4.6 Conclusion 141 5 THE SUBJECT WITHOUT: POLITICAL UNION AND THE SYMBOLISM OF THE WEU 146 5.1 Death of NATO? 148 5.2 Europe as a Political Giant 157 5.3 Birth, Bedtime and Awakening of the WEU 168 5.4 European Pillar of the Atlantic Alliance 173 5.5 Defence Arm of a Political Union 181 5.6 Ethos of Responsibility 194 5.7 Conclusion 199 6 CODA 204 6.1 Meaning and Failure of a Political Symbol 204 6.2 Towards a Newer Europe 211 7 BIBLIOGRAPHY 219 iv Acknowledgements In preparing this dissertation, I have benefited enormously from the criticism and advice of my academic supervisors, professors David Campbell and Vilho Harle. In personal conversations and correspondence, Pami Aalto, Martin Coward, Simon Dalby, Marieke de Goede, Jussi Hanen, Aini Linjakumpu, Sami Moisio, Mika Ojakangas, Erna Rijsdijk, Gerard Toal, and a number of anonymous referees have shared with me information, valuable views and critical comments. I have also benefited from the criticism and support given to me by the examiners of my licentiate’s dissertation, Tuomas Forsberg and Juha Tolonen. At different scholarly meetings I have benefited from the comments and criticism of a number of fellow scholars. Naturally, none of these friendly critics should be held in any way accountable for the text’s deficiencies, which are wholly my responsibility. For providing me the financial resources for this dissertation, I wish to thank the Finnish Graduate School of Political Science and International Relations (VAKAVA), Ella & Georg Ehrnrooth’s Fund, The Academy of Finland, the Department of Politics at the University of Newcastle upon Tyne, the Faculty of Social Sciences at the University of Lapland, Aimo O. Aaltonen’s Fund, and Vammaiskoulutuksen Tuki ry. Finally, I wish to thank my wife Johanna for all the personal and professional support she has given me over the years. Without you none of this would have ever happened. v 1 Introduction This dissertation is about the use and the significance of organicist metaphors in European security discourse after the Cold War. It makes explicit how Europe has been identified as a political entity in European security discourse after the Cold War. As its point of departure this dissertation takes Carl Schmitt’s conception of political subjectivity, and from there it proceeds as a reading of the metaphors used in the identification of Europe as a political entity with the European Community or Union as its political subject. This dissertation concludes with a note on the limits of the political theory founded on the use of organicist metaphors. The use of organicist metaphors in political discourse has been studied, but not, to my knowledge, in a specifically European context. The foundations for the study of the political metaphor of the body were laid by David George Hale (1971). Hale’s The Body Politic traced the history of the analogy from classical antiquity, and explicated its use in Renaissance English literature, where it flourished with the rise of national states in Europe. Antoine de Baecque (1997) told the history of the French Revolution through the metaphor of the body as it appeared in the popular literature of the time, and showed how these metaphors were at the very centre of the language used to describe the revolution in progress. Jonathan Gil Harris (1998) studied the organic political analogy in Tudor and Stuart England and suggested that early modern figurations of social pathology echo in many twentieth century discourses of nation and social formation. In his study of identity politics, David Campbell (1998) identified an organicist discourse in the history of the practice of United States foreign policy and demonstrated how it has contributed to the reproduction of the political identity of that state. In other words, the metaphor of the body has been studied in the discursive production of statehood and states. But, is Europe a state? It does not qualify as a political entity in the sense that states do – or does it? This has been a subject of some theoretical debate, which has forced the discipline of International Relations to reconsider its dominant conceptions 1 of political “actor-ness”. For example, Simon Hix (1999) has argued that European integration has certainly produced a new and a complex political system, but, lacking a Weberian monopoly on the legitimate use of coercion, it is not a state. In the same note, Michael Smith (2001) has written that the European Union is a major presence in the contemporary global arena, but it is not a state in the accepted international meaning of the term, although it demonstrates some “state-like” features. The purpose of this study is not to assess whether or not Europe is “really” a state or a political entity of any other name or definition. Rather, the focus of this study is on the social practices of representation of political entities in general, and Europe in particular. By not looking to identify objects whose existence is independent of ideas or beliefs about them, this study embraces a logic of interpretation that, in Campbell’s (1998, 4) words, “acknowledges the improbability of cataloging, calculating, and specifying the ‘real causes’, and concerns itself instead with considering the manifest political consequences of adopting one mode of representation over another”. The title of this dissertation has been inspired by Rudolf Kjellén’s 1916 book Staten som Lifsform (State as Living Organism). In his book, Kjellén outlined the essential nature of states as political entities by asking: what should be the terms used to describe political entities? Before giving an elaborate theoretical answer to his question, Kjéllen opened the morning paper, and in what could be described as an early exercise of discourse analysis, had a look what were the terms used to describe them. Political entities, or states for Kjellén, were territorially defined subjects the identities of which revealed themselves in their external relations vis-à-vis other states, and the nature of which reflected by their representation in everyday use of language (Kjellén 1916, 17-18). To make his point, Kjellén cited an issue of Standard writing on trouble in the Balkans: ‘Austria’, it writes, ‘stands now as the champion of armed despotism, as an enemy of the law of nations – it is scandalous that one of the most civilised nations of Europe has ambushed Turkey and robbed it on a public highway’. Elsewhere, Austria is accused of ‘cheating Bulgaria to go forward with its silly attempts’; and of ‘pushing Bulgaria 2 forward in a resort to subterfuge’, in a bid not to ‘unscrupulously break agreements and breach the peace’, on the pretext of which it itself is ‘taking security measures’ and is ‘ready to compensate’. Then it writes that ‘Germany has its hands on every development’; Germany ‘stands behind’; it has ‘taken revenge and isolated England, and won Russia on its side by making references to the Dardanelles and Italy’s promises’, etc. And elsewhere, it is saying that ‘Germany is looking angrily at Bulgaria while pretending not to see, and thereby excusing, the infringement of Austria -Hungary’.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Conceptions of Living Space in the Small-State Geopolitics of Gudmund Hatt Larsen, Henrik Gutzon
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by VBN Aalborg Universitet "The need and ability for expansion" Conceptions of living space in the small-state geopolitics of Gudmund Hatt Larsen, Henrik Gutzon Published in: Political Geography DOI (link to publication from Publisher): 10.1016/j.polgeo.2010.12.006 Publication date: 2011 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication from Aalborg University Citation for published version (APA): Larsen, H. G. (2011). "The need and ability for expansion": Conceptions of living space in the small-state geopolitics of Gudmund Hatt. Political Geography, 30(1), 38-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2010.12.006 General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. ? Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. ? You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain ? You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ? Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us at [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded
    [Show full text]
  • Japanese Geopolitics and the Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere
    64-12,804 JO. Yung-Hwan, 1932- JAPANESE GEOPOLITICS AND THE GREATER EAST ASIA CO-PROSPERITY SPHERE. The American University, Ph.D., 1964 Political Science, international law and relations University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Copyright by Yung-Hwan Jo 1965 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. JAPANESE GEOPOLITICS AND THE GREATER EAST ASIA CO-PROSPERITY SPHERE by Yung-Hwan Jo Submitted to the Faoulty of the Graduate School ef The Amerioan University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Dootor of Philosophy in International Relations and Organization Signatures of Committee: Chairman LiwLi^^ sdt-C'Ut'tUVC'Uo-iU i L’yL ■ ; June 1964 AMERICAN UNIVERSITY The Amerioan University LIBRARY Washington, D. C. JUL9 1964 WASHINGTON. D. C. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. PREFACE This is a study of the Greater East Asia Co- Prosperity Sphere with emphasis on the influence of geo­ political thought in the formation of its concept. It is therefore a rather technical study of one aspect of Japanese diplomacy. Practically no studies have been made con­ cerning the influence of geopolitics on Japanese foreign policy. It is not the purpose of this study to attaok or defend the geopolitics or the concept of the Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere at any stage of its development, but rather to understand it. The principal data used in preparing this work are: (l) Various records of the International Military Tribunal of the Far East; (2) microfilmed arohives of the Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 1868-1945; (3) materials written by Japanese geopoliticians as well as Haushofer; and (4) letters from authorities in the different aspects of this work.
    [Show full text]
  • European Elites and Ideas of Empire, 1917–1957
    Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.33.22, on 02 Oct 2021 at 05:04:48, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/DC85C5D84467A2F4A8F8E5EE7BD2B4AA Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.33.22, on 02 Oct 2021 at 05:04:48, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/DC85C5D84467A2F4A8F8E5EE7BD2B4AA EUROPEAN ELITES AND IDEAS OF EMPIRE, 1917–1957 Who thought of Europe as a community before its economic integra- tion in 1957? Dina Gusejnova illustrates how a supranational European mentality was forged from depleted imperial identities. In the revolutions of 1917–1920, the power of the Hohenzollern, Habsburg, and Romanoff dynasties over their subjects expired. Even though Germany lost its credit as a world power twice in that century, in the global cultural memory, the old Germanic families remained associated with the idea of Europe in areas reaching from Mexico to the Baltic region and India. Gusejnova’s book sheds light on a group of German-speaking intellectuals of aristocratic origin who became pioneers of Europe’s future regeneration. In the minds of transnational elites, the continent’s future horizons retained the con- tours of phantom empires. This title is available as Open Access at 10.1017/9781316343050. dina gusejnova is Lecturer in Modern History at the University of Sheffield. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.33.22, on 02 Oct 2021 at 05:04:48, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms.
    [Show full text]
  • Geopolitics (For Encyclopedia of Globalization, Edited by George Ritzer (Routledge, 2012) George Steinmetz
    Geopolitics (for Encyclopedia of Globalization, edited by George Ritzer (Routledge, 2012) George Steinmetz 1.What is Geopolitics? Historical shifts in meaning and contemporary definitions The word geopolitics points to the interface between two distinct ontological realms and scientific disciplines, geography and politics. The first of these root words, “geography,” is not necessarily restricted in this context to traditional geographic concerns like climate or the earth’s physical surface, but entails a much broader spatial perspective concerned with scale and location, the size, shape, and boundaries of territories, and the processes by which territories are socially defined. The other root word, “politics,” points toward subfields of political science like international relations which are also focused on states and empires, borders and frontiers, international alliances and polarizations, the balance and imbalance of global power, and war, imperialism, and diplomacy (Burchill and Linklater 1996). If geopolitics is delimited by the overlap between geography and politics, this definition does not yet specify the nature of the relationship between the two realms. The founding decades of geopolitical discussion saw an emphasis on geographical modes of explanation. Geopolitical thinkers at the turn of the previous century emphasized the effects of physical geography and spatial location on a state’s growth and decline and its military and foreign policies. The word geopolitics was coined by the Swedish social scientist Rudolf Kjellén (1917: 46), who defined it as “the doctrine of the state as a geographic organism or a spatial phenomenon: i.e., the state as land, territory, region, or, most precisely, as a Reich [realm, empire].” Kjellén’s thinking was based largely on the work of German geographer Friedrich Ratzel, who founded the subfields of political geography and anthropo-geography as the study of the geographical basis of the state’s action (Ratzel 1882, 1897).
    [Show full text]
  • Creating National Space(S): Anthropogeography and Nation-Building in Interwar Yugoslavia, 1918-1941
    Creating National Space(s): Anthropogeography and Nation-Building in Interwar Yugoslavia, 1918-1941 Vedran Duančić Thesis submitted for assessment with a view to obtaining the degree of Doctor of History and Civilization of the European University Institute Florence, 25 January 2016 European University Institute Department of History and Civilization Creating National Space(s): Anthropogeography and Nation-Building in Interwar Yugoslavia, 1918-1941 Vedran Duančić Thesis submitted for assessment with a view to obtaining the degree of Doctor of History and Civilization of the European University Institute Examining Board Prof. Pavel Kolář, European University Institute (Supervisor) Prof. Alexander Etkind, European University Institute Prof. Dejan Djokić, Goldsmiths, University of London Prof. Hannes Grandits, Humboldt University of Berlin © Vedran Duančić, 2016 No part of this thesis may be copied, reproduced or transmitted without prior permission of the author ABSTRACT The dissertation examines anthropogeography in and of interwar Yugoslavia. It studies geography as a scientific enterprise, its institutional growth, which in the Yugoslav context began in the 1880s and intensified during the first half of the twentieth century, and the communication between scientific centers in Yugoslavia and abroad. Professionalization and institutionalization were crucial for obtaining a scientific apparatus and social authority that enabled geographers to act as politically engaged “nationally conscious” intellectuals who, nevertheless, insisted on
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Re-Envisioning Germany's Mapped Space: (Re
    RE-ENVISIONING GERMANY’S MAPPED SPACE: (RE)CONSTRUCTING NATIONAL IDENTITY, 1945-1961 By MATTHEW D. MINGUS A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2013 1 © 2013 Matthew D. Mingus 2 To Lindsey 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS A great number of people were critical to the completion of this project. In fact, had it not been for particular individuals, I doubt that I could have withstood a great deal of the institutional nonsense that passes for ‘administration’ in American academia today. I am, however, obligated to say kind things about ‘the hand that feeds’ and so I admit it: the University of Florida subsidized my ability to eat, rent an apartment, and do very little else. There have been other, more reasonable sources of financial support for my research. The UF History Department provided me with a dissertation research grant which helped launch me across the Atlantic and into the German archives. The Leibnitz-Institut für Länderkunde in Leipzig was also kind enough to help fund my trip abroad and provide me access to their wonderful library and archive. Ute Wardenga, Norman Henniges, and Bruno Schelhaas were particularly helpful and enthusiastic about my project. I hope that this dissertation does not disappoint them. The American Geographical Society Library awarded me the Helen and John S. Best Research Fellowship which allowed me to visit its archive in Milwaukee (where I ended meeting two of the finest geographical minds I have ever had the pleasure of encountering: those of Geoffrey Martin and Norman Stewart).
    [Show full text]
  • Perforated Sovereignty: the Geopolitical Dilemma of Aegean Hydrocarbons
    PERFORATED SOVEREIGNTY: THE GEOPOLITICAL DILEMMA OF AEGEAN HYDROCARBONS _______________________________________ A Thesis presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School at the University of Missouri-Columbia _______________________________________________________ In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirement for the Degree Master of Arts _____________________________________________________ by MELISSA ANNE NORTH HIGGS Dr. Soren Larsen, Thesis Supervisor DECEMBER 2018 The undersigned, appointed by the dean of the Graduate School, have examined the thesis entitled: PERFORATED SOVEREIGNTY: THE GEOPOLITICAL DILEMMA OF AEGEAN SEA HYDROCARBONS presented by Melissa Anne North Higgs, a candidate for the degree of Master of Arts, and hereby certify that, in their opinion, it is worthy of acceptance. __________________________________________________ Dr. Soren Larsen ___________________________________________________ Dr. Joseph Hobbs __________________________________________________ Dr. Nikolaos Poulopoulos Winds in the East, Mist coming in Like something is brewin’, About to begin. Can’t put my finger on what lies in store, But I feel what’s to happen, All happened before. Mary Poppins To my Mother and Father who introduced me to the world, To my husband Gary who has given me the world, To my children, Karen and Jonathan, who allowed me to see the world anew through their eyes. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The pathway to this graduate school experience has been a rather circuitous route that was many years in coming, beginning in earnest with my husband’s receipt of a Fulbright Fellowship in Athens, Greece in 2010. Along the way, there have been many people and events that have played a major role in innumerable crucial ways; I cannot even begin to enumerate them all. But what can one say when a line in the acknowledgments will never be enough? I owe you all so much more than a simple ‘Thank you very much’, Merci beaucoup, and/or Efcharistó pára polý for your insights, guidance and support than I can ever say! I am, and will be, forever in your debt.
    [Show full text]
  • "Geopolitics" In
    1 Geopolitics programmatically entitled book Influences of Geographic Environment that “the natural envi- GEORGE STEINMETZ ronment” was “the physical basis of history” (Semple 1911: 2). Geopolitical thinkers at the The word geopolitics points to the interface turn of the century emphasized the effects of between two distinct ontological realms and physical geography and spatial location on the scientific disciplines, geography, and politics. growth and decline of states and on military and The first of these root words, “geography,” is foreign policies. British geographer Halford not necessarily restricted in this context to tra- Mackinder (1904: 422), another key founder ditional geographic concerns like climate or of geopolitics, argued that the “geographical the Earth’s physical surface, but entails a much causation” of politics was permanent, ines- broader spatial perspective concerned with capable, and pervasive, and that control of the scale and location, the size, shape, and bounda- inaccessible lands of the Eurasian “pivot” area ries of territories, and the processes by which (see Figure 3) was the key to world supremacy. territories are socially defined. The other root Alfred Thayer Mahan, a Rear Admiral in the word, “politics,” points toward subfields of US Navy, developed an opposing argument political science like international relations about the primacy of seapower and control of which are also focused on states and empires, the sea. In a chapter on the “general nature of borders and frontiers, international alliances geographical influences,” British historian H.B. and polarizations, the balance and imbalance George argued (1907: 7) that “the destinies of of global power, and war, imperialism, and man are very largely determined by their envi- diplomacy (Burchill & Linklater 1996).
    [Show full text]
  • Geopolitics and the Study of International Relations A
    GEOPOLITICS AND THE STUDY OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY SEMRA RANÂ GÖKMEN IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN THE DEPARTMENT OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS AUGUST 2010 Approval of the Graduate School of Social Sciences Prof. Dr. Meliha Altunışık Director I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Prof. Dr. Meliha Altunışık Head of Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Prof. Dr. Necati Polat Supervisor Examining Committee Members Prof. Dr. İhsan Dağı (METU, IR) Prof. Dr. Necati Polat (METU, IR) Prof. Dr. Nuri Yurdusev (METU, IR) Prof. Dr. İdris Bal (Police Academy) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Mesut Yeğen (METU, SOC) ii I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last Name: Semra Rana Gökmen Signature: iii ABSTRACT GEOPOLITICS AND THE STUDY OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Gökmen, Semra Rana Ph.D., Department of International Relations Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Necati Polat August 2010, 226 pages This study seeks to examine the main theories and theorists of geopolitical imagining and argue for an intrinsic relation between traditional geopolitics and the development of international relations both in theory and practice.
    [Show full text]
  • Geopolitics Political Radicalisation of These Elements in Anglophobia and Anti-Semitism
    HIMA 14,1_Dictionary_326-335 3/29/06 1:50 PM Page 327 Geopolitics political radicalisation of these elements in Anglophobia and anti-Semitism. In the A: [u©ràfiyà siyàsìya. – F: géopolitique. – context of the capitalist interwar crisis, G: geopolitik. – R: geopolitika. S: geopolítica. – German geopolitics can best be understood C: diyuan zhengzhixue. as the ideology of a ‘continental German The term ‘geopolitics’ was formalised by the imperialism’ (Diner 1984, 2) and a theoretical Swedish constitutional lawyer Rudolf Kjellén riposte to Marxist theories of imperialism. (1864–1922) and systematically developed Between 1916 and 1944, the concept of and raised to a doctrine of international geopolitics reaches its phase of greatest relations by Karl Haushofer (1869–1946) public influence; first during the revisionist during the period of Europe’s intensifying intellectual struggles against the Versailles interstate rivalries after the turn of the Treaties and, thereafter, as a key legitimation century. It had the objective of emphasising for national-socialist Großraumpolitik. The the primary determination of the political disastrous consequences of WWII led to the by space. Since the 1970s, it is supposed to term’s widespread discrediting in the Federal capture in its formally neutralised version Republic, even though the concept was ‘power struggles over territories for the not altogether taboo (Grabowsky 1960). purpose of political control over space’ Elements of the term were revived during (Lacoste 1993). the 1980s by conservative historians in the Cross-nationally, the concept entails three ‘Historians’ Controversy [Historikerstreit]’ in core elements: a bio-organic notion of the what Hans-Ulrich Wehler described as state, a social-Darwinist view of inter-state ‘middle position palaver [Mittellagen Palaver]’ relations defined as a struggle for Lebensraum (Wehler 1988, 224), seconded by Jürgen [living space], and the deduction of the Habermas who referred to the term’s public political from spatio-natural determinants.
    [Show full text]
  • Jacobsonwayne1968.Pdf (453.2Kb)
    WISCONSIN STATE UNIVERSITY - LA CROSSE GRADUATE COLLEGE Candidate: Wayne A Jacobson I recommend acceptance of this seminar paper to the Graduate College in partial fulfillnient of thls candidnte's ,- qulrements for the degree Master of Science. The candidate La,. >c..>leted his oral seminar report. d& aper Advisor This seminar paper is approved for the Graduate College. ! Lebensraum: Geography, Geopolitics, and The Third Reich A Seminar Paper Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School Wisconsin State University - Lacrosse In Partitl Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science by Wayne A. Jacobson Nay 16, 1968 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Illustrations ..................................i ..11 I. Introduction.................................... ...... 1 11. Historical Development ................................5- 111. Political Geography Versus Geopolitlco ................ 4 IV. Political Geography of Germany .........................I V. Haushofer and Ideas that Influeneed Him: ..............10 Ratzel, Kjellen, and the Japanese 1 VI. Mackinder'a Theory .................................. :.3 - VII. Haushofer and Nazi Germany .......................... 19 VIII. Future Applications of the Concept of Geopolitics .........................................3C Bibliography ............................................ .33 Appendix ..................................................35 TABLE _OF ILLUSTRATIONS ii Changes In the boundariefi of Germany a.s a i.c::ul.t 0.f iiorld V:lr I. ................................ g .,-..?. ,,,,.. Y'IIL: iY<!\i \for1 (1 i~yIsL~.~,.I~I Bornan, 1928 1;;lcKir:Lar's pivot arezr, b~lsedon his map of 1904. .........16 iron Political Geo:l;rophy by Nornran Pounds, 1963. Circles represc~itine;the rclative populaticil of thc ';!orZd Island ad its setellites. ..................17 f7.o::.A 3er:locr:itic 1cie:'is and Re; lity by fi-lfora A,.. :-:kinder, ,Ir iibd. Circjt~;sre,resenting the resltive areas of the ';orlfL Island and its sotellites.
    [Show full text]