DOCSLIB.ORG

Financial Performance and Risk Perception

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Financial Performance and Risk Perception An Assessment of India’s Energy Choices: Financial Performance and Risk Perception Vinit Atal, Climate Policy Initiative Gireesh Shrimali, Climate Policy Initiative May 2018 A Four-Report Series by Climate Policy Initiative & Indian School of Business May 2018 An Assessment of India’s Energy Choices: Financial Performance and Risk Perception About the Series: An Assessment of India’s Energy Choices This report is part of a four-report series that looks at the future of renewable energy in India along different economic dimensions. The four reports in the series are: Social Costs of Coal-Based Electricity in India: Estimates of Impact on Health and Agriculture Ashwini Chhatre, Indian School of Business What it Means for the Economy, Jobs, and Energy Security Dr. Meeta Keswani Mehra, JNU and Dr. Saptarshi Mukherjee, IIT Financial Performance and Risk Perception Vinit Atal and Gireesh Shrimali, Climate Policy Initiative Managing India’s Renewable Energy Integration through Flexibility Vivek Sen, Saurabh Trivedi, and Gireesh Shrimali, Climate Policy Initiative Acknowledgements The authors of this report would like to acknowledge the interviewees from various banks, power project developers and other financial institutions who were interviewed for this study. We would also like to acknowledge Vivek Sen, Deepak Gupta, Dr. Christoph Wolff, Vikas Mehta, Dr. P.C. Maithani, and Deepak Krishnan for their guidance and review. Special thanks to Elysha Davila and Angel Jacob for editing and review, and Tim Varga for graphics. Descriptors Sector Electricity/Power Region India Keywords Power; Fossil fuels; Renewable energy; Fossil Fuel energy; Risk; Risk perception; India. Contact Dr. Gireesh Shrimali [email protected] Copyright © 2018 Climate Policy Initiative www.climatepolicyinitiative.org All rights reserved. For private circulation only A CPI Report 2 May 2018 An Assessment of India’s Energy Choices: Financial Performance and Risk Perception About Climate Policy Initiative With deep expertise in policy and finance, Climate Policy Initiative works to improve the most important energy and land use practices around the world. Our mission is to help governments, businesses, and financial institutions drive growth while addressing climate risk. CPI works in places that provide the most potential for policy impact including Brazil, Europe, India, Indonesia, and the United States. CPI’s India program is registered with the name, “Climate Policy Foundation” under Section 8 of the Companies Act, 2013. About ISB The Indian School of Business (ISB) is a global business school offering world-class management education across its two campuses – Hyderabad and Mohali. The School has grown at a rapid pace since its inception and already has several notable accomplishments to its credit – it is the youngest school ever to consistently rank among the top Global MBA programmes, the first institution in South Asia to receive the prestigious AACSB accreditation, one of the largest providers of Executive Education in Asia, and the most research productive Indian management institution. A vibrant pool of research- oriented resident faculty and strong academic associations with leading global B-schools, have helped the ISB fast emerge as a premier global Business school in the emerging markets. For more details visit www.isb.edu. About Shakti Sustainable Energy Foundation This initiative has been partially supported by Shakti Sustainable Energy Foundation. Shakti Sustainable Energy Foundation works to strengthen the energy security of India by aiding the design and implementation of policies that support renewable energy, energy efficiency and sustainable transport solutions. For more details, please visit www.shaktifoundation.in. The views/analysis expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect the views of Shakti Sustainable Energy Foundation. The foundation also does not guarantee the accuracy of any data included in this publication nor does it accept any responsibility for the consequences of its use. A CPI Report 3 May 2018 An Assessment of India’s Energy Choices: Financial Performance and Risk Perception Executive Summary India has prioritized electricity access as a key driver of We answer these questions using two approaches – ex socio-economic development. Each year, as part of the post empirical analysis of financial performance data of country’s successive National Electricity Plans, the gov- power-producing companies, and primary research with ernment has set targets that scale up electrical capacity investors in the sector to understand their perceptions additions. of the risk and the areas of concern. India has also set ambitious targets for renewable energy in the context of climate change commitments, with a goal to increase the proportion of renewable How have the renewable energy and fossil energy sources in the country’s electricity generation mix to up to 40% by 2030 from 14% as of March, 2016. fuel power sectors fared financially in the past with respect to risk and risk-adjusted returns? These dual electricity generation targets require signif- icant investment. The total investment requirements for generation capacity addition is estimated to be INR 10.3 trillion during the period 2017-2022, which includes the We find that the renewable energy power sector has funds required for renewable energy sources capacity been less risky than the fossil fuel power sector. The addition, as well as the advance action on the projects listed renewable energy power sector in India has his- coming up during the years 2022-27. The total fund torically exhibited half as much systematic (or non-di- requirement for the period 2022-27 is estimated to be versifiable) risk as the listed fossil fuel power sector. INR 6.1 trillion (Draft National Electricity Plan, 2016). Using past trends as an indicator of future performance, This represents a massive opportunity for investors to there is reason to believe this trend will continue in the make profitable investments in the power sector, using absence of major upheavals to the sector. This presents both fossil fuel and renewable energy technologies. evidence for continued growth of the renewable energy Policymakers need to design policies to reduce barriers power sector in spite of gradual easing of policy support to investment to be able to reach government targets from the government. for each technology. Renewable energy power has been a more lucrative This paper is part of a four-part series produced by investment than fossil fuel power. Renewable energy Climate Policy Initiative that compares renewable power portfolios have historically shown more attractive energy and fossil fuel based power along different investment characteristics including, on average, 12% dimensions including social costs, macroeconomic higher annual returns, 20% lower annual volatility, and impacts, environmental impact, financial risk, and flexi- 61% higher risk-adjusted returns. Thus, a portfolio of bility considerations. renewable energy power companies would be deemed more efficient than a portfolio of fossil fuel power com- This particular study seeks to study and compare the panies, as per the modern portfolio theory, providing historical and present-day financial performance and an investor with a given risk appetite higher returns in risk profile of the renewable energy and fossil fuel comparison. power sectors, in order to inform investors and policy- makers, by answering questions such as: Stock returns for both renewable energy and fossil fuel power companies are robustly correlated with • How have the renewable energy and fossil fuel market returns. Using econometric methods, we were power sectors fared financially in the past with unable to determine whether other relevant factors respect to risk and risk-adjusted returns? such as company size, value, leverage, coal prices, rupee • How does investors’ risk perception of the exchange rate, and term premium are robustly priced renewable energy and fossil fuel power sectors into the stock returns. differ? • What factors contribute to the differing risk perceptions of the renewable energy and fossil fuel power sectors? A CPI Report 4 May 2018 An Assessment of India’s Energy Choices: Financial Performance and Risk Perception The main risk factors driving the risk perception of both renewable energy and fossil fuels are counter- How does investors’ risk perception of the party, grid, and financial risks. These risks together renewable energy and fossil fuel power account for 50% - 54% of the total risk premium. Further, sectors differ? for the fossil fuel power sector, the resource risk and power market risk are also significant, contributing to 26% of the total risk premium. Accordingly, policy and market interventions targeting Investors perceive renewable energy power invest- the mitigation of barriers associated with these risks ments to be less risky than fossil fuel power invest- have the highest potential for reducing the cost of ments. The expected returns on debt to the fossil fuel capital for investments, by up to 4% of the cost of debt power sector is at least 80 basis points (bps) higher of renewable energy investments, and up to 5.1% of the than for expected returns on debt for the renewable cost of debt for fossil fuel energy investments. energy power sector. The higher risk perception of the thermal power sector may be attributed to sourcing Counterparty risk is the most significant risk by far. issues and import dependency for coal and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • AR-15-16 with Cover.Pmd
    Annual Report 2015-16 (April 1, 2015 to March 31, 2016) OF CHEM E IC T A U L T I E T N S G N I I N E N E A I R D S N I E STD. 1947 Indian Institute of Chemical Engineers 1 List of Council Members for 2015 & 2016 2015 Designation 2016 Mr G V Sethuraman, Director, Enfab Industries Pvt. Ltd., C-2, Shantiniwas, Mettuguda, Mr Shyam Bang, Executive Director, Jubilant Life Sciences Ltd., 1A, Sector 16A, Noida Secunderabad – 500 017, Andhra Pradesh, [O] (040) 2782-4343, 2782-0010/2782-3073, President - 201 301, Uttar Pradesh, [R] (011) 2922-9999, [Mobile] (0)9810106660, [R] (040) 2733-4321/5363, [Mobile] 9849028854, [email protected] [email protected] Prof Ch V Ramachandra Murthy, Department of Chemical Engineering, Andhra Univer- Immediate Past Mr G V Sethuraman, Enfab Industries Pvt. Ltd., Plot No. 138-A, IDA Mallapur, Hyderabad sity, Waltair, Visakhapatnam 530 003, [O] (0891) 2754871 Extn.496, [R] (0891) 2504520, President 500 076, Andhra Pradesh, O] (040) 2782-4343, 2782-0010/2782-3073, [R] (040) 2733- [Mobile] (0)94403 89136, [email protected] 4321/5363, [Mobile] 9849028854, [email protected] Mr D M Butala, 5, Mohak, B/h. Manisha Society, Behind Raja’s Lavkush, Bunglow, Near Prof S V Satyanarayana, Department of Chemical Engineering, JNTUA College of Upendra Bhatt’s Bunglow, Syed Vasana Road, Baroda 390 015, [R] (0265) 225-3977, Engineering, Anantapuramu Dist., Andhra Pradesh – 515002, [O] (08554) 272325 Ext: [Mobile] (0)9979853514, [email protected] Vice 4602, [Mobile] (0)9849509167, [email protected] Presidents Prof V V Basava Rao, Plot No; 184, Tirumala Nagar Colony, Meerpet (V), Moula-Ali Hous- Prof G A Shareef, 9, 2nd Stage, 2 Block, R M V Extn.
    [Show full text]
  • Reforming Soes in Asia: Lessons from Competition Law and Policy in India
    ADBI Working Paper Series REFORMING SOES IN ASIA: LESSONS FROM COMPETITION LAW AND POLICY IN INDIA Vijay Kumar Singh No. 1056 December 2019 Asian Development Bank Institute Vijay Kumar Singh is a professor and head of the Department of Law and Management at the University of Petroleum and Energy Studies School of Law in Dehradun, India. The views expressed in this paper are the views of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of ADBI, ADB, its Board of Directors, or the governments they represent. ADBI does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this paper and accepts no responsibility for any consequences of their use. Terminology used may not necessarily be consistent with ADB official terms. Working papers are subject to formal revision and correction before they are finalized and considered published. The Working Paper series is a continuation of the formerly named Discussion Paper series; the numbering of the papers continued without interruption or change. ADBI’s working papers reflect initial ideas on a topic and are posted online for discussion. Some working papers may develop into other forms of publication. Suggested citation: Singh, V. K. 2019. Reforming SOEs in Asia: Lessons from Competition Law and Policy in India. ADBI Working Paper 1056. Tokyo: Asian Development Bank Institute. Available: https://www.adb.org/publications/reforming-soes-asia-lessons-competition-law-policy-india Please contact the authors for information about this paper. Email: [email protected], [email protected] Asian Development Bank Institute Kasumigaseki Building, 8th Floor 3-2-5 Kasumigaseki, Chiyoda-ku Tokyo 100-6008, Japan Tel: +81-3-3593-5500 Fax: +81-3-3593-5571 URL: www.adbi.org E-mail: [email protected] © 2019 Asian Development Bank Institute ADBI Working Paper 1056 V.
    [Show full text]
  • Aluminium Sector Analysis Report
    Aluminium Sector Analysis Report The most commercially mined aluminium ore is bauxite, as it has the highest content of the base metal. The primary aluminium production process consists of three stages. First is mining of bauxite, followed by refining of bauxite to alumina and finally smelting of alumina to aluminium. India has the fifth largest bauxite reserves with deposits of about 3 bn tonnes or 5% of world deposits. India's share in world aluminium capacity rests at about 3%. Production of 1 tonne of aluminium requires 2 tonnes of alumina while production of 1 tonne of alumina requires 2 to 3 tonnes of bauxite. The aluminium production process can be categorised into upstream and downstream activities. The upstream process involves mining and refining while the downstream process involves smelting and casting & fabricating. Downstream-fabricated products consist of rods, sheets, extrusions and foils. Power is amongst the largest cost component in manufacturing of aluminium, as the production involves electrolysis. Consequently, manufacturers are located near cheap and abundant sources of electricity such as hydroelectric power plants. Alternatively, they could set up captive power plants, which is the pattern in India. Indian manufacturers are the lowest cost producers of the base metal due to access to captive power, cheap labour and proximity to abundant supply of raw material, i.e., bauxite. The Indian aluminium sector is characterised by large integrated players like Hindalco and National Aluminium Company (Nalco). The other producers of primary aluminium include Indian Aluminium (Indal), now merged with Hindalco, and Sterlite Industries. The per capita consumption of aluminium in India continues to remain abysmally low at1.2 kg as against nearly 15 to 18 kgs in the western world and 10 kgs in China.
    [Show full text]
  • Jitpur Colliery Location
    JITPUR COLLIERY LOCATION: Jitpur Colliery of Collieries Division, M/s Steel Authority of India Ltd is located in the eastern part of the Jharia Coal field District Dhanbad, Jharkhand. The mine take area is around 1.62 Sq.Km. The area is covered by the Survey of India Toposheet No. 73 I/6 and is bounded by Latitude 23° 42’ 32” north to 23° 43’ 14” north and Longitude 86° 23’ 05” east to 86° 24’ 14” east. The property is bounded by existing Jamadoba 6 & 7 pits of TISCO to the North (Rise Side), Bhutgoria mine(closed) of BCCL to the North and North-West, Jamadoba colliery(TISCO) Pit 4&5 to the south (Dip Side) & West and Digwadih (TISCO) to the East. Jitpur Colliery is well connected by metal road with district head quarter Dhanbad. It is located at 15Km south of Dha 333nbad by road. Background: Jitpur Colliery has been in operation prior to nationalization and operation is still continuing. There are two mouzas under Jitpur Colliery viz. Noonudih Mouza (Area: 73.68 ha ) & Jitpur Mouza (Area: 87.31 ha). Both these Mouzas have been granted lease for 991 years w.e.f 22/05/1901 & 991 years w.e.f 28/05/1902 respectively. Jitpur Colliery Colliery consists of one underground mine only. Coal from Jitpur Colliery is being transported by ropeway to Chasnalla Washery for washing. Detailed exploration was conducted by drilling 21 exploratory bore holes in 1950s. Further, in 1959, five underground boreholes were drilled from XVI seam floor. The detailed geological investigations in the proposed mine has established the presence of 8 No.
    [Show full text]
  • DISCUSSION PAPER COAL TRANSITION in INDIA Thomas Spencer, Raghav Pachouri, G Renjith, Sachi Vohra, TERI
    DISCUSSION PAPER COAL TRANSITION IN INDIA Thomas Spencer, Raghav Pachouri, G Renjith, Sachi Vohra, TERI NOVEMBER 2018 COAL TRANSITION IN INDIA 1 © COPYRIGHT The material in this publication is copyrighted. Content from this discussion paper may be used for non-commercial purposes, provided it is attributed to the source. Enquiries concerning reproduction should be sent to the address: The Energy and Resources Institute Darbari Seth Block, India Habitat Centre, Lodhi Road, New Delhi – 110 003, India Author Mr Thomas Spencer, Fellow, TERI, Mr Raghav Pachouri, Associate Fellow, TERI, Mr G. Renjith, Research Associate, TERI, and Ms Sachi Vohra, Project Associate, TERI Reviewers Mr R R Rashmi, Distinguished Fellow, TERI and Mr Karan Mangotra, Fellow & Associate Director, TERI ACKNOWLEDGMENT This paper has been produced as part of the efforts of Climate Transparency, an international partnership of TERI and 13 other research organizations and NGOs comparing G20 climate action – www.climate-transparency.org. The paper is financed by the International Climate Initiative (IKI). The Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU) supports this initiative on the basis of a decision adopted by the German Bundestag. The authors would like to thank the following people for their constructive comments on earlier drafts: Mr. RR Rashmi, Distinguished Fellow, TERI. Mr Karan Mangotra, Associate Director, TERI. Ms. Jesse Burton, Energy Research Centre, University of Cape Town. Ms. Lena Donat, Germanwatch. Ms. Hannah Schindler, Climate Transparency. Mr. Leo Roberts, Overseas Development Institute. All opinions expressed, as well as omissions and eventual errors are the responsibility of the authors alone. SUGGESTED FORMAT FOR CITATION Spencer, Thomas et al.
    [Show full text]
  • 70 POLICIES THAT SHAPED INDIA 1947 to 2017, Independence to $2.5 Trillion
    Gautam Chikermane POLICIES THAT SHAPED INDIA 70 POLICIES THAT SHAPED INDIA 1947 to 2017, Independence to $2.5 Trillion Gautam Chikermane Foreword by Rakesh Mohan © 2018 by Observer Research Foundation All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without permission in writing from ORF. ISBN: 978-81-937564-8-5 Printed by: Mohit Enterprises CONTENTS Foreword by Rakesh Mohan vii Introduction x The First Decade Chapter 1: Controller of Capital Issues, 1947 1 Chapter 2: Minimum Wages Act, 1948 3 Chapter 3: Factories Act, 1948 5 Chapter 4: Development Finance Institutions, 1948 7 Chapter 5: Banking Regulation Act, 1949 9 Chapter 6: Planning Commission, 1950 11 Chapter 7: Finance Commissions, 1951 13 Chapter 8: Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951 15 Chapter 9: Indian Standards Institution (Certification Marks) Act, 1952 17 Chapter 10: Nationalisation of Air India, 1953 19 Chapter 11: State Bank of India Act, 1955 21 Chapter 12: Oil and Natural Gas Corporation, 1955 23 Chapter 13: Essential Commodities Act, 1955 25 Chapter 14: Industrial Policy Resolution, 1956 27 Chapter 15: Nationalisation of Life Insurance, 1956 29 The Second Decade Chapter 16: Institutes of Technology Act, 1961 33 Chapter 17: Food Corporation of India, 1965 35 Chapter 18: Agricultural Prices Commission, 1965 37 Chapter 19: Special Economic Zones, 1965 39 iv | 70 Policies that Shaped India The Third Decade Chapter 20: Public Provident Fund, 1968 43 Chapter 21: Nationalisation of Banks, 1969 45 Chapter
    [Show full text]
  • Coal in India Adjusting to Transition
    Coal in India Adjusting to transition Rahul Tongia and Samantha Gross PAPER 7 MARCH 2019 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We are grateful for the generous support of the David M. Rubenstein Special Initiative Fund for enabling this joint effort between the Brookings Institution and Brookings India. This report builds on existing Brookings India research on the future of Indian coal—a study supported by a grant from Tata Steel. We also thank researchers at Brookings India for their help in data gathering and analysis, including Abhishek Mishra, Puneet Kamboj, Anurag Sehgal, Sahil Ali, and Tanmay Verma, and editorial help from Sydney Bartone, Rohan Laik, and Zehra Kazmi. We also thank participants at an author workshop at Brookings, and anonymous reviewers. We also acknowledge helpful comments and inputs from David G. Victor and Rohit Chandra. INDEPENDENCE The Brookings Institution is a nonprofit organization devoted to independent research and pol- icy solutions. Its mission is to conduct high-quality, independent research and, based on that research, to provide innovative, practical recommendations for policymakers and the public. The conclusions and recommendations of any Brookings publication are solely those of its au- thor(s), and do not reflect the views of the Institution, its management, or its other scholars. ABOUT THE AUTHORS Rahul Tongia is a fellow with Brookings India, and his work focuses on technology and policy, es- pecially for sustainable development. He leads the energy and sustainability group at Brookings India, and also is active in broader issues of technology. Tongia’s work spans the energy landscape, especially electricity, with focuses on supply options including renewable energy (covering finance, grid integration, etc.); smart grids, which use innovative information and communications technol- ogy to improve management of the electric utility grid; issues of access and quality; and broader issues of reforms and regulations, including electricity pricing.
    [Show full text]
  • India's New Coal Geography
    Energy Research & Social Science 73 (2021) 101903 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Energy Research & Social Science journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/erss India’s new coal geography: Coastal transformations, imported fuel and state-business collaboration in the transition to more fossil fuel energy Patrik Oskarsson a,*, Kenneth Bo Nielsen b, Kuntala Lahiri-Dutt c, Brototi Roy d a Department of Rural and Urban Development, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Sweden b Department of Social Anthropology, University of Oslo, Norway c Crawford School of Public Policy, Australian National University, Australia d Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Spain ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: The advance of renewable energy around the world has kindled hopes that coal-based energy is on the way out. Resource geography Recent data, however, make it clear that growing coal consumption in India coupled with its continued use in Energy transition China keeps coal-based energy at 40 percent of the world’s heat and power generation. To address the consol­ Coal energy infrastructure idation of coal-based power in India, this article analyses an energy transition to, rather than away from, carbon- Energy security intensive energy over the past two decades. We term this transition India’s new coal geography; the new coal India geography comprises new ports and thermal power plants run by private-sector actors along the coastline and fuelled by imported coal. This geography runs parallel to, yet is distinct from, India’s ‘old’ coal geography, which was based on domestic public-sector coal mining and thermal power generation.
    [Show full text]
  • COVID-19 and a Just Transition in India's Coal Mining Sector
    On behalf of: on the basis of a decision by the German Bundestag COVID-19 and a Just Transition in India’s Coal Mining Sector Study by: Imprint Commissioned on behalf of Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy (BMWi), Govt. of Germany Commissioned by Indo-German Energy Forum Support Office (IGEF-SO) and c/o Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH 1st Floor, B-5/2 Safdarjung Enclave 110029 New Delhi, India Email: [email protected] Website: www.energyforum.in Tel.: +91 11 4949 5353 Responsible Tobias Winter, GIZ GmbH Authors Prof. Johannes Urpelainen Prince Sultan bin Abdulaziz Professor of Energy, Resources and Environment, Johns Hopkins SAIS [email protected] Setu Pelz PhD candidate, Reiner Lemoine Institute, Berlin Advisors/Reviewers Sandeep Pai Michaël Aklin Brian Blankenship Noah Zucker Christoffer Brick Content This short report discusses the uncertainties within the coal mining sector in India following the COVID 19 pandemic, highlighting the importance of a just transition for coal mining communities. It provides policy recommendations for new directions in public finance within and outside the energy sector to support job creation and industrial development against the backdrop of an increasingly uncertain coal value chain. About ISEP The Initiative for Sustainable Energy Policy (ISEP) is an interdisciplinary research program that uses cutting-edge social and behavioral science to design, test, and implement better energy policies in emerging economies. Hosted at the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS), ISEP identifies opportunities for policy reforms that allow emerging economies to achieve human development at minimal economic and environmental costs.
    [Show full text]
  • Coal India BSE SENSEX S&P CNX 44,633 13,134 CMP: INR130 TP: INR193 (+49%) Buy Volumes Rise As Power Demand Recovers Valuations Attractive; Dividend Yield of ~9%
    3 December 2020 Update | Sector: Utilities Coal India BSE SENSEX S&P CNX 44,633 13,134 CMP: INR130 TP: INR193 (+49%) Buy Volumes rise as power demand recovers Valuations attractive; dividend yield of ~9% Dispatches rise 8% YoY in November; YTDFY21 down just ~2% YoY Coal India (COAL)’s dispatches reported an 8% YoY increase at 51.3mt for Stock Info November. This marked the fourth straight month of YoY growth – highlighted Bloomberg COAL IN by continued recovery in power demand. As per initial data from POSOCO, Equity Shares (m) 6,207 M.Cap.(INRb)/(USDb) 822.1 / 10.8 India’s power demand / coal-based generation has risen 3.5%/5.2% YoY. 52-Week Range (INR) 215 / 110 YTDFY21, Coal India’s off-take is now down just ~2% YoY (1HFY21: -8% YoY). 1, 6, 12 Rel. Per (%) 4/-37/-45 With continued recovery in power demand, we conservatively raise our FY21 12M Avg Val (INR M) 1813 Free float (%) 33.9 off-take estimates to 580mt (flat YoY) v/s 565mt earlier (-3% YoY). Our estimates imply ~2% YoY off-take growth for the remainder of FY21. Financials Snapshot (INR b) Y/E Mar 2020 2021E 2022E Worst likely behind as demand continues to recover Net Sales 960.8 906.9 1,041.4 A large proportion of Coal India’s costs are fixed in nature, with employee costs EBITDA 219.2 152.8 223.0 accounting for ~55% of the company’s expenses. Furthermore, the company PAT 167.0 110.2 157.3 EPS (INR) 27.1 17.9 25.5 has focused on OBR (overburden removal) activities, thereby utilizing Gr.
    [Show full text]
  • Occupational Health and Safety Needs Assessment in Coal Mines
    OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY NEEDS ASSESSMENT IN THE COAL MINES OF DHANBAD, JHARKHAND, INDIA Conducted By Asia Monitor Resource Centre 8-B, Nathan Road, Yau-Matei Kowlon Hong Kong www.amrc.org.hk & THE ASIAN WORKERS OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH, SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE Sindhorn Building 15th Fl., Tower 3, 130-132 Wittayu Rd. Patumwan, Bangkok 10330 THAILAND Webpage: www.ohseinstitute.org Sanjiv Pandita, Asia Monitor Resource Centre 1 Introduction An occupational health and safety needs assessment exercise was carried out by Asia Monitor Resource Centre (AMRC), South Asian Research and Development Initiative (SARDI) and the International Confederation of Free Trade Unions (ICFTU) in collaboration with the Indian National Mine Workers Federation (affiliated to the INTUC) on behalf of the Asian Workers Occupational Health, Safety and Environment Institute (OSHEI). The exercise was carried out in the coal mining region of Dhanbad, Jharkhand state (previously part of Bihar) in India. The aims of this exercise were to: • assess the overall heath and safety situation in the coal mines of Dhanbad1; • assess the role of government and the employer in providing the safe and healthy environment for the workers and the actual situation at ground level; • assess the present capacity and infrastructure of the trade unions with respect to occupational heath and safety and if there is any need/scope for improvement; • assess the present Mining Laws and Regulations; • present a set of recommendations on how trade unions can improve their capacity to work with government and employers to further develop working and living conditions of miners and specific sectors where trade unions may need help and support.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Openness
    GLOBAL INDEX OF ECONOMIC OPENNESS Economic Openness India Case Study 2019 CREATING THE PATHWAYS FROM POVERTY TO PROSPERITY ABOUT THE LEGATUM INSTITUTE The Legatum Institute is a London-based think tank with a global vision: to see all people lifted out of poverty. Our mission is to create the pathways from poverty to prosperity, by fostering Open Economies, Inclusive Societies and Empowered People. We do this in three ways: Our Centre for Metrics which creates indexes and datasets to measure and explain how poverty and prosperity are changing. Our Research Programmes which analyse the many complex drivers of poverty and prosperity at the local, national and global level. Our Practical Programmes which identify the actions required to enable transformational change. ABOUT THE AUTHORS Dr. Stephen Brien is Director of Policy at the Legatum Institute. Daniel Herring is a Senior Analyst at the Legatum Institute. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors would like to thank Harsha V. Singh (Senior Fellow, Council on Emerging Market Enterprises at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy), Alex Friedman, Bianca Swalem, Ed King, and Preksha Dugar for their contribution to this work. The authors would also like to thank Kadambari Shah and Vaidehi Tandel, of the IDFC Institute, for their contribution to this work. The views expressed in this report are those of the Legatum Institute and do not necessarily reflect those of the IDFC Institute. This publication was made possible through the support of a grant from Templeton World Charity Foundation, Inc. The opin- ions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Templeton World Charity Foundation, Inc.
    [Show full text]