DOCSLIB.ORG

1+1 National Library

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

National Library Bibliothèque nationale 1+1 of Canada du Canada ,\cquisitions and Direction des acquisitions et Bibliographie SelVices Braneh des selViees bibliographiques 395 Wellington Street 395. fue Wellmgton Ottawa, Ontario Ollawa (Ontario) K1AQN4 K1AQN4 NOTICE AVIS The quality of this microform is La qualité de cette microforme heavily dependent upon the dépend grandement de la qualité quality of the original thesis de la thèse soumise au submitted for microfilming. rnicrofilmage. Nous avons tout Every effort has been made to fait pour assurer une qualité ensure the highest quality of supérieure de reproduction. reproduction possible. If pages are missing, contact the S'il manque des pages, veuillez university which granted the communiquer avec l'université degree. qui a conféré le grade. Sorne pages may have indistinct La qualité d'impression de print especially if the original certaines pages peut laisser à pages were typed with a poor désirer, surtout si les pages typewriter ribbon or if the originales ont été university sent us an inferior dactylographiées à l'aide d'un photocopy. ruban usé ou si l'université nous a fait parvenir une photocopie de qualité inférieure. Reproduction in full or in part of La reproduction, même partielle, this microform is governed by de cette microforme est soumise the Canadian Copyright Act, à la Loi canadienne sur le droit R.S.C. 1970, c. C-30, and d'auteur, SRC 1970, c. C-30, et subsequent amendments. ses amendements subséquents. Canada • THE KING AND THE GENERAL: Survival Strategies in lordan and Lebanon BASSEL FAWZI SALLOUKH Department of Political Science McGiIl University, Montreal • August 1994 A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Masler's of Arts. • (cl BASSEL FAWZI SALLOUKH, 1994 National Library Bibliothèque nationale 1+1 of Canada du Canada Acquisitions and Direction des acquisitions et Bibliographie services Branch des services bibliographiques 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington onawa.Onlario Ollawa (Onlano) K1A QN4 K1A QN4 THE AUTHOR HAS GRANTED AN L'AUTEUR A ACCORDE UNE LICENCE IRREVOCABLE NON-EXCLUSIVE IRREVOCABLE ET NON EXCLUSIVE LICENCE ALLOWING THE NATIONAL PERMETTANT A LA BIBLIOTHEQUE LIBRARYOF CANADATO NATIONALE DU CANADA DE REPRODUCE, LOAN, DISTRmUTE OR REPRODUIRE, PRETER, DISTRIBUER SELL COPIES OF mSIHER THESIS BY OU VENDRE DES COPIES DE SA ANY MEANS AND IN Am FORM OR THESE DE QUELQUE MANIERE ET FORMAT, MAKll-lG TffiS THESIS SOUS QUELQUE FORME QUE CE SOIT AVAILABLE TO INTEIŒSTED POUR METTRE DES EXEMPLAIRES DE PERSONS. CETTE THESE A LA DISPOSITION DES PERSONNE INTERESSEES. THE AUTHOR RETAINS OWFERSHIP L'AUTEUR CONSERVE LA PROPRIETE OF THE COPYRIGHT IN iI!~r.ffiR DU DROIT D'AUTEUR QUI PROTEGE THESIS. NEITHER THE THESIS NOR SA THESE. NI LA THESE NI DES SUBSTANTIAL EXTRACTS FRO~' IT EXTRAITS SUBSTAN'flELS DE CELLE­ MAY BE PRINTED OR OTHERWISE CI NE DOIVENT ETRE IMPRIMES OU REPRODUCED WITHOUT mSIHER AUTREMENT REPRODUITS SANS SON PERMISSION. AUTORISATION. ISBN 0-315-99932-2 Canada FOR L1BRARV USE: SHORT TITLE M.A. THESIS BV BASSEL FAWZI SALLOUKH THE KING AND THE GENERAL: SURVIVAL STRATEGIES IN JORDAN AND LEBANON. • FORHASHEM • • • ABSTRACT Thi:' study is a comparaIive analysis of the survival strategies of two regimcs: Jordan's King Hussein and Lebanon's Fu'ad Shihab. It is an exploration of the domcstic determinants of forcign policy behaviour, and the relation betwecn foreign policy bchaviour and rcgime consolidation, Icgitimation, and survivai in small, wcak statc aetors located in a permeable regional system. The study advanees an hypothesis of four explanatory variables to explain the success and failure of Hussein and Shihab's respective strategies. Husseinism's 'suceess' - as opposed to Shihabism's 'failure' - may be explained by a successful insulatory regional poliey, the historical process of state formation, the availability of cconor.lic resources under state control, and the ability of the state to use its coercive resources without hindranee. This enabled the Hashemite regime to restructure state-society relations to consolidate social • control, mitigate the effects of trans-national ideologies on the domestic arena, and achieve an acceptable level of national integration among the different segments of the society gaining the state allegiance l'rom a sizcable number, or l'rom strategic sectors, of the population, • • RÉSUMÉ Cette étude est une analyse comparative des stratégies de sunic th: deux régimes: ccux du Roi Hussein de Jordanie et du Président Libanais Fu'ad Shihab. Cet essai explore les déterminants dmnesti'lul's de la politique étrangère, de même que la relation entre la politique étrangère, la l:onsolidation du régime. la légitimation, et la survie de petits acteurs étatiques, faibles et situés dans un système régional perméahle. L'étude avance une hypothèse consistant de quatre variables explicatives qui élucident, alternativement, le succès ou l'échec des stratégies respectives de Hussein et Shihab. Le 'succès' du Husscinisme - par opposition à 'l'échec' du Shihabisme - peut être expliqué par le succès d'une politique régionale isolatrice, d'un processus historique de formation étatique, de la présence de ressources économiques à la disposition de l'État, et de la possibilité du recours sans entraves à des ressources coercibles. Ceci a permis au régime • Hashemite de restructurer les relations État-société en vue de consolider le contrôle étatique, mais aussi de mitiger l'impact des idéologies trans-nationales sur l'arène domestique, et d'atteindre un nive:1lI acceptable d'intégration des différents secteurs de la société, avec pour résultat l'allégeance nationale d'une large partie - ou des secteurs stratégiques - de la population. • • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 1should like to thank Professor Rex Brynen for his generous assistance and intellectual guidance throughout the writing of this study. My friends and colleagues at McGiIl transformed Montrea!'s coId winters into pleasurable and productive months. They ail deserve my appreciation and gratitude. 1 am grateful to Joelle Zahar for translating the Abstract into French, and to Yusuf Arafat and Ziad Kurjieh for lheir help in locating some of the references used in this study. My greatest debl of gratitude is due my family: Fawzi, Hind. Zeina, and Hashem. My parents' love and support has sustained me throughout this solitary and arouons enterprise. Some time ago, when 1 was a young high school sludent, my sister Zeina allempted to explain to me why Lebanon's political system is dubbed a 'consociational democracy.' She then swiftly dismissed its viability. 1hope Zeina finds • my similar objections persuasive. My brother Hashem has bt'en my Iife-Iong companion, and has taken care of me since the day 1 set foot on this continent. 1 shoula Iike to dedicate this study to him as a small token of my great debt of gratitude. • • TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1. PLURAL SOCIETIES: DEFINITION, DlLEMMAS, AND MODELS 1.1 Plural Society: A Definition 4 1.2 The Weak State Syndrome: Diagnoses and Dilemmas 9 1.3 Stability in Plural Societies: Models and Strategies 18 2. STATE FORMATION, CLEAVAGE INSTITUTIONALIZATION, AND REGIONAL PERMEABILlTY: JORDAN AND LEBANON 25 2.1 State Fonnation in Jordan 25 2.2 State Fonnation in Lebanon 38 2.3 Regional Penneability, Domestic Politics. and Foreign Policy Options 52 3. KING HUSSEIN'S SURVIVAL STRATEGY: HUSSEINISM 60 3.1 The Extra-Regional Umbrella: Protecting the Hashemite Kingdom 60 3.2 The Regional Diplomacy of Survival: Between Accommodation • and Confrontation 69 3.3 Domestic Sources of Survival: Symbols and Techniques 79 3.4 The Success of Husseinism 89 4. FC"AD SHlHAB'S SURVIVAL STRATEGY: SHlIlABISM 91 4.1 The 1958 Civil War: The 'Asabiyya Dilemma Exposed 91 4.2 Regional Accommodation and Extra-Regional Neutrality: Insulating the Shihabist State 96 4.3 Domestic Engineering: Building al-Mujtama' al-Jadid and al-Dawla al-Haditha IlKI 4.4 The Failure of Shihabism III 5. CONCLUSION: EXPLANATIONS AND IMPLICATIONS 117 5.1 Husseinism and Shihabism: Explaining 'Success' and 'Failure' 117 5.2 Definitional and Theoretical Implications 120 • BIBLIOGRAPHY 128 • /11 Ille acliolls of011 mell, alld especially prillces, wllere Illere is 110 courl ofappea/, Ille elld is 011 11101 coullls. LeI a prillce Illell cOllcem IIimself willl I!le acquisilioll or I!le mailllellallce of Ille slale; Ille mealls emp/oyed will a/ways be cOllsidered llOlIourab/e alld praised by ail ••• Machiavelli, T!le Prillce. • • INTRODUCTION • Survival in power is the paramount objective of ail state !l'aders. 1'0 be sure. tlll' methods employed to guarantee survival differ. with dramatic consequences for the population. l'ct the objeeti"" is often invariable. ln the developing world. where political survival is often closely rl'lated 10 physieal survival. the leader's tenure at the helm acquires added urgency. In this case. survival reqnir,'s th,' acquisition and maintenance of the state, anù the legitimation and consolidation of rule. This study is a comparative analysis of the survival strategies of two regimes: Jordan's King Hussein and Lebanon's Fu'ad Shihab. lt is an exploration of the ùomestic determinants of foreign poliey behaviour. and the relation between foreign policy behaviour and regime maintenance and survival in small, weak state actors located in a permeable regional system, ln part, the study attempts ta complement, but move away from, the two dominant intellectual traditions in the analysis of foreign poliey behavinnr in the Middle East: the realist and the psychologicallperceptual approaehes. 1 Instead of looking III slales • or the deeision-making l'lite, this study looks ill/o states, particularly at the domestic faclors and politieal dynamies that constrain and determine foreign poliey behaviour, and consequently. at the instrumental use of foreign policy for purposes of regime legitimacy and consolidation. The purpose of this study is to explain the success and faiIure of Hussein and Shihab's respective survival strategies, Both regimes devised roughly simiIar survival strategies in response to the same national problematic, Since independence.
Recommended publications
  • What Can Be Done to Protect Schools and Universities from Military Use?

    What Can Be Done to Protect Schools and Universities from Military Use?

    QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ON THE DRAFT LUCENS GUIDELINES Global Coalition to Protect Education from Attack GCPEA 1 GCPEA Global Coalition to Protect Education from Attack What is military use of schools and universities? During armed conflicts, schools and universities are often used by armed forces and non-state armed groups as bases, barracks and temporary shelters, defensive and offensive positions or observation posts, weapons stores, and detention and interro - gation centres. Classrooms, school grounds, and lecture halls are also used for military training and to forcibly recruit children into armed groups. Sometimes schools and universities are taken over entirely, and students are pushed out completely. At other times education facilities are partially used for military purposes, with troops building a firing position on a school’s roof, or using a few classrooms, or occupying a playground while students continue to attend. Schools can be used for military purposes for a few days, months, or even years, and may be used during school hours, or when schools are not in session, over holidays, or in the evening. In all instances, military use of schools and universities puts students, teachers, and academics at risk. Where is military use of schools and universities happening? According to the Global Coalition to Protect Education from Attack (GCPEA), between 2005 and 2014, national armed forces and non-state armed groups, multi-national forces, and even peacekeepers have used schools and universities in at least 25 countries during armed confict, including: Afghanistan, Central African Republic, Chad, Colombia, Côte d’Ivoire, Democratic Republic of Congo, Georgia, India, Iraq, Israel/Palestine, Libya, Mali, Myanmar, Nepal, Pakistan, Philippines, Somalia, South Sudan, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Syria, Thailand, Uganda, Ukraine, and Yemen.
  • The Impact of British Imperialism on the Landscape of Female Slavery in the Kano Palace, Northern Nigeria Author(S): Heidi J

    The Impact of British Imperialism on the Landscape of Female Slavery in the Kano Palace, Northern Nigeria Author(S): Heidi J

    International African Institute The Impact of British Imperialism on the Landscape of Female Slavery in the Kano Palace, Northern Nigeria Author(s): Heidi J. Nast Source: Africa: Journal of the International African Institute, Vol. 64, No. 1 (1994), pp. 34-73 Published by: Cambridge University Press on behalf of the International African Institute Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1161094 . Accessed: 25/10/2013 22:54 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Cambridge University Press and International African Institute are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Africa: Journal of the International African Institute. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 129.128.216.34 on Fri, 25 Oct 2013 22:54:39 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Africa 64 (1), 1994 THE IMPACT OF BRITISH IMPERIALISM ON THE LANDSCAPE OF FEMALE SLAVERY IN THE KANO PALACE, NORTHERN NIGERIA Heidi J. Nast INTRODUCTION State slavery was historically central to the stability and growth of individual emirates in the Sokoto caliphate of northern Nigeria, an area overlapping much of the linguistic sub-region known as Hausaland (Fig. 1).
  • Download The

    Download The

    Nothing to declare: Why U.S. border agency’s vast stop and search powers undermine press freedom A special report by the Committee to Protect Journalists Nothing to declare: Why U.S. border agency’s vast stop and search powers undermine press freedom A special report by the Committee to Protect Journalists Founded in 1981, the Committee to Protect Journalists responds to attacks on the press worldwide. CPJ documents hundreds of cases every year and takes action on behalf of journalists and news organizations without regard to political ideology. To maintain its independence, CPJ accepts no government funding. CPJ is funded entirely by private contributions from individuals, foundations, and corporations. CHAIR HONORARY CHAIRMAN EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Kathleen Carroll Terry Anderson Joel Simon DIRECTORS Mhamed Krichen Ahmed Rashid al-jazeera Stephen J. Adler David Remnick reuters Isaac Lee the new yorker Franz Allina Lara Logan Alan Rusbridger Amanda Bennett cbs news lady margaret hall, oxford Krishna Bharat Rebecca MacKinnon David Schlesinger Susan Chira Kati Marton Karen Amanda Toulon bloomberg news the new york times Michael Massing Darren Walker Anne Garrels Geraldine Fabrikant Metz ford foundation the new york times Cheryl Gould Jacob Weisberg Victor Navasky the slate group Jonathan Klein the nation getty images Jon Williams Clarence Page rté Jane Kramer chicago tribune the new yorker SENIOR ADVISORS Steven L. Isenberg Sandra Mims Rowe Andrew Alexander David Marash Paul E. Steiger propublica Christiane Amanpour Charles L. Overby cnn international freedom forum Brian Williams msnbc Tom Brokaw Norman Pearlstine nbc news Matthew Winkler Sheila Coronel Dan Rather bloomberg news columbia university axs tv school of journalism Gene Roberts James C.
  • For Immediate Release. FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 30, 2011, 6-9 Pm

    For Immediate Release. FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 30, 2011, 6-9 Pm

    For Immediate Release. Please add this information to your listings. Thank you! O’BORN CONTEMPORARY presents: REVOLUTION, a solo exhibition, featuring photographs from the Egyptian revolution by ED OU OCTOBER 1 – NOVEMBER 5, 2011 www.oborncontemporary.com DATES: FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 30, 2011, 6-9 pm Exhibition Opening and Reception Show Continues to NOVEMBER 5, 2011 Artist will be in attendance. Saturday, October 1, 12-5 pm Informal artist tours & talks. LOCATION: 131 Ossington Avenue, Toronto. GALLERY HOURS: Tuesday – Saturday, 11 – 6 and by appointment. TELEPHONE: 416.413.9555 EXHIBITION STATEMENT: In January of 2011, Egyptians from all corners of the country erupted in mass protests, challenging the heavy-handed rule of President Hosni Mubarak. The entire world watched, as Egyptians fought to have their grievances heard using sticks, stones, shouts, cell phones, and computers. Over the course of eighteen days, protesters occupied Tahrir square, the symbolic heart of the revolution where Egyptians of all ages and parts of society could speak with one unified voice, demanding the ouster of the president. They debated politics, shared their testimonies, supported each other, and mapped out their hopes and dreams for their country. On February 11, President Mubarak resigned, ending thirty years of autocratic rule. As the euphoria and excitement dies down, Egyptians are beginning to question what they have actually achieved. They are asking themselves what they want to make of their new Egypt and how to reconcile with decades of mistrust of authority, corruption, and an economy in shambles. The difficult part arguably, is still to come. ABOUT THE ARTIST: Ed Ou (24) is a culturally ambiguous Canadian photojournalist who has been bouncing around the Middle East, former Soviet Union, Africa, and the Americas.
  • United Arab Emirates (Uae)

    United Arab Emirates (Uae)

    Library of Congress – Federal Research Division Country Profile: United Arab Emirates, July 2007 COUNTRY PROFILE: UNITED ARAB EMIRATES (UAE) July 2007 COUNTRY اﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴّﺔ اﻟﻤﺘّﺤﺪة (Formal Name: United Arab Emirates (Al Imarat al Arabiyah al Muttahidah Dubai , أﺑﻮ ﻇﺒﻲ (The seven emirates, in order of size, are: Abu Dhabi (Abu Zaby .اﻹﻣﺎرات Al ,ﻋﺠﻤﺎن Ajman , أ مّ اﻟﻘﻴﻮﻳﻦ Umm al Qaywayn , اﻟﺸﺎرﻗﺔ (Sharjah (Ash Shariqah ,دﺑﻲّ (Dubayy) .رأس اﻟﺨﻴﻤﺔ and Ras al Khaymah ,اﻟﻔﺠﻴﺮة Fajayrah Short Form: UAE. اﻣﺮاﺗﻰ .(Term for Citizen(s): Emirati(s أﺑﻮ ﻇﺒﻲ .Capital: Abu Dhabi City Major Cities: Al Ayn, capital of the Eastern Region, and Madinat Zayid, capital of the Western Region, are located in Abu Dhabi Emirate, the largest and most populous emirate. Dubai City is located in Dubai Emirate, the second largest emirate. Sharjah City and Khawr Fakkan are the major cities of the third largest emirate—Sharjah. Independence: The United Kingdom announced in 1968 and reaffirmed in 1971 that it would end its treaty relationships with the seven Trucial Coast states, which had been under British protection since 1892. Following the termination of all existing treaties with Britain, on December 2, 1971, six of the seven sheikhdoms formed the United Arab Emirates (UAE). The seventh sheikhdom, Ras al Khaymah, joined the UAE in 1972. Public holidays: Public holidays other than New Year’s Day and UAE National Day are dependent on the Islamic calendar and vary from year to year. For 2007, the holidays are: New Year’s Day (January 1); Muharram, Islamic New Year (January 20); Mouloud, Birth of Muhammad (March 31); Accession of the Ruler of Abu Dhabi—observed only in Abu Dhabi (August 6); Leilat al Meiraj, Ascension of Muhammad (August 10); first day of Ramadan (September 13); Eid al Fitr, end of Ramadan (October 13); UAE National Day (December 2); Eid al Adha, Feast of the Sacrifice (December 20); and Christmas Day (December 25).
  • Lebanon: Managing the Gathering Storm

    Lebanon: Managing the Gathering Storm

    LEBANON: MANAGING THE GATHERING STORM Middle East Report N°48 – 5 December 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS................................................. i I. A SYSTEM BETWEEN OLD AND NEW.................................................................. 1 A. SETTING THE STAGE: THE ELECTORAL CONTEST..................................................................1 B. THE MEHLIS EFFECT.............................................................................................................5 II. SECTARIANISM AND INTERNATIONALISATION ............................................. 8 A. FROM SYRIAN TUTELAGE TO WESTERN UMBRELLA?............................................................8 B. SHIFTING ALLIANCES..........................................................................................................12 III. THE HIZBOLLAH QUESTION ................................................................................ 16 A. “A NEW PHASE OF CONFRONTATION” ................................................................................17 B. HIZBOLLAH AS THE SHIITE GUARDIAN?..............................................................................19 C. THE PARTY OF GOD TURNS PARTY OF GOVERNMENT.........................................................20 IV. CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................. 22 A. A BROAD INTERNATIONAL COALITION FOR A NARROW AGENDA .......................................22 B. A LEBANESE COURT ON FOREIGN
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 111 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION

    Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 111 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION

    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 111 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 155 WASHINGTON, MONDAY, JANUARY 12, 2009 No. 6 House of Representatives The House was not in session today. Its next meeting will be held on Tuesday, January 13, 2009, at 12:30 p.m. Senate MONDAY, JANUARY 12, 2009 The Senate met at 2 p.m. and was The legislative clerk read the fol- was represented in the Senate of the called to order by the Honorable JIM lowing letter: United States by a terrific man and a WEBB, a Senator from the Common- U.S. SENATE, great legislator, Wendell Ford. wealth of Virginia. PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE, Senator Ford was known by all as a Washington, DC, January 12, 2009. moderate, deeply respected by both PRAYER To the Senate: sides of the aisle for putting progress The Chaplain, Dr. Barry C. Black, of- Under the provisions of rule I, paragraph 3, ahead of politics. Senator Ford, some of the Standing Rules of the Senate, I hereby fered the following prayer: appoint the Honorable JIM WEBB, a Senator said, was not flashy. He did not seek Let us pray. from the Commonwealth of Virginia, to per- the limelight. He was quietly effective Almighty God, from whom, through form the duties of the Chair. and calmly deliberative. whom, and to whom all things exist, ROBERT C. BYRD, In 1991, Senator Ford was elected by shower Your blessings upon our Sen- President pro tempore. his colleagues to serve as Democratic ators.
  • A Case Study of Hadejia Emirate, Nigeria (1906-1960)

    A Case Study of Hadejia Emirate, Nigeria (1906-1960)

    COLONIALISM AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF AFRICAN SOCIETIES: A CASE STUDY OF HADEJIA EMIRATE, NIGERIA (1906-1960) BY MOHAMMED ABDULLAHI MOHAMMED MAH/42421/141/DF A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE COLLEGE OF HIGHER DEGREES AND RESEARCH IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE AWARD OF THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN HISTORY OF KAMPALA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY MAY, 2015 DECLARATION This is my original work and has not been presented for a Degree or any other academic award in any university or institution of learning. ~ Signature Date MOHAMMED ABDULLAHI MOHAMMED APPROVAL I confirm that the work in this dissertation proposal was done by the candidate under my supervision. Signiture Supervisor name Date Peter Ssekiswa DEDICATION This work is dedicated to my late mother may her soul rest in perfect peace and my humble brother Yusif Bashir Hekimi and my wife Rahana Mustathha and the entire fimily In ACKNOWLEDGEMENT lam indeed grateful to my supervisor Peter Ssekiswa , who tirelessly went through my work and inspired me to dig deeper in to the core of the m matter , His kind critism patience and understanding assrted me a great deal Special thanks go to Vice Chancellor prof P Kazinga also a historian for his courage and commitment , however special thanks goes to Dr Kayindu Vicent , the powerful head of department of education (COEDU ) for friendly and academic discourse at different time , the penalist of the viva accorded thanks for observation and scholarly advise , such as Dr SOFU , Dr Tamale , Dr Ijoma My friends Mustafa Ibrahim Garga
  • Suddensuccession

    Suddensuccession

    SUDDEN SUCCESSION Examining the Impact of Abrupt Change in the Middle East SIMON HENDERSON KRISTIAN C. ULRICHSEN EDITORS MbZ and the Future Leadership of the United Arab Emirates IN PRACTICE, Sheikh Muhammad bin Zayed al-Nahyan, the crown prince of Abu Dhabi, is already the political leader of the United Arab Emirates, even though the federation’s president, and Abu Dhabi’s leader, is his elder half-brother Sheikh Khalifa. This study examines leadership in the UAE and what might happen if, for whatever reason, Sheikh Muham- mad, widely known as MbZ, does not become either the ruler of Abu Dhabi or president of the UAE. THE WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY ■ POLICY NOTE 65 ■ JULY 2019 SUDDEN SUCCESSION: UAE RAS AL-KHAIMAH UMM AL-QUWAIN AJMAN SHARJAH DUBAI FUJAIRAH ABU DHABI ©1995 Central Intelligence Agency. Used by permission of the University of Texas Libraries, The University of Texas at Austin. Formation of the UAE moniker that persisted until 1853, when Britain and regional sheikhs signed the Treaty of Maritime Peace The UAE was created in November 1971 as a fed- in Perpetuity and subsequent accords that handed eration of six emirates—Abu Dhabi, Dubai, Sharjah, responsibility for conduct of the region’s foreign rela- Fujairah, Ajman, and Umm al-Quwain. A seventh— tions to Britain. When about a century later, in 1968, Ras al-Khaimah—joined in February 1972 (see table Britain withdrew its presence from areas east of the 1). The UAE’s two founding leaders were Sheikh Suez Canal, it initially proposed a confederation that Zayed bin Sultan al-Nahyan (1918–2004), the ruler would include today’s UAE as well as Qatar and of Abu Dhabi, and Sheikh Rashid bin Saeed al-Mak- Bahrain, but these latter two entities opted for com- toum (1912–90), the ruler of Dubai.
  • Difference Between Democracy and Monarchy Is Explained Here In

    Difference Between Democracy and Monarchy Is Explained Here In

    Difference between Democracy and Monarchy is explained here in detail.Democracy is a form of government in which the people have the authority to choose their governing legislation.A monarchy is a form of government in which a person, the monarch, is a head of state for life or until abdication. This topic is important from the perspective of understanding the clear distinctions between Democracy and Monarchy. Aspirants would find this article very helpful while preparing for the IAS Exam. ​ ​ The major Differences between Democracy and Monarchy are: Democracy Monarchy When a country is ruled by a Government When a country is ruled by Kings and elected by its people through elections, then it Queens, when the right to rule a country is called a Democracy passed through dynasty and not through elections,then it is called monarchy. The elected representatives makes the laws, The laws are framed by the Kings and rules and regulations on behalf of the people, Queens. People have no say in the for the welfare of the people formulation of laws. The elected representatives are held The Kings and Queens have no accountable by the people of the country. accountability. People do not have the power Hence elections are held and representatives to remove Kings and Queens from power if lose their right to rule, if they do not meet the they are dissatisfied with their rulings. expectations of the people People have the freedom to give their People do not have the right to condemn the feedback on policies, have the option to bring Monarchy.
  • Kings for All Seasons

    Kings for All Seasons

    BROOKINGS DOHA CENTER ANALYSIS PAPER Number 8, September 2013 KINGS FOR ALL SEASONS: HOW THE MIDDLE EAST’S MONARCHIES SURVIVED THE ARAB SPRING F. GREGORY GAUSE, III B ROOKINGS The Brookings Institution is a private non-profit organization. Its mission is to conduct high-quality, independent research and, based on that research, to provide innovative, practical recommendations for policymakers and the public. The conclusions and recommendations of any Brookings publica- tion are solely those of its author(s) and do not reflect the views of the Institution, its management, or its scholars. Copyright © 2013 THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION 1775 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036 U.S.A. www.brookings.edu BROOKINGS DOHA CENTER Saha 43, Building 63, West Bay, Doha, Qatar www.brookings.edu/about/centers/doha T A B LE OF C ON T EN T S I. Executive Summary ............................................................................................................1 II. Introduction ......................................................................................................................3 III. “Just Wait, They Will Fall” .............................................................................................5 IV. The Strange Case of Monarchical Stability .....................................................................8 Cultural Legitimacy ...................................................................................................8 Functional Superiority: Performance and Reform ..................................................12
  • The Taliban's Online Emirate

    The Taliban's Online Emirate

    International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence ISSN: 0885-0607 (Print) 1521-0561 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ujic20 The Taliban’s Online Emirate Carl Anthony Wege To cite this article: Carl Anthony Wege (2017) The Taliban’s Online Emirate, International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence, 30:4, 833-837, DOI: 10.1080/08850607.2017.1337453 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08850607.2017.1337453 Published online: 07 Sep 2017. Submit your article to this journal View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=ujic20 Download by: [73.190.106.112] Date: 07 September 2017, At: 14:50 BOOKREVIEWS 833 The Taliban’s Online Emirate CARL ANTHONY WEGE Neil Krishan Aggarwal: The Taliban’s Virtual Emirate: The Culture and Psychology of an Online Militant Community Columbia University Press, New York, 2016, 211 p., $60. Neil Aggarwal, a Harvard- and of its distinct target audiences Yale-trained psychiatrist, has turned thereby increasing support for the his many talents to an analysis neo-Taliban insurgency. of The Taliban’s Virtual Emirate During the 1980s, foreshadowing emergent over the last decade. modern Taliban efforts in the cyber While a number of studies have been domain, Gulbuddin Hekmatyar’s published on al-Qaeda’s virtual Hizb-e Islami began publishing hard world and some on the Islamic State copy Islamist periodicals in Arabic, (ISIS), rather little is available on Pashto, Dari, Urdu, and English the Taliban’s cyber presence. Dr. during the Jihad against the Aggarwal utilizes his training in Soviets.