Women of Color in the Feminist Movement: an Invisible Subgroup?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Women of Color in the Feminist Movement: an Invisible Subgroup? Women of Color in the Feminist Movement: An Invisible Subgroup? By: Carolyn Friend Problem z Do women of color have a strong presence in the feminist movement ? z How did feminist organizations for women of color take off ? Are there connections between their rise and the rise of general feminist and general women’s organizations? z Does there seem to be a connection to historical events and other social movements? Theories and Hypotheses z Organization dynamic model: growing density of civil rights organizations promoted women’s activism and organizational activity. (Minkoff 1997) z Most ethnic/racial minority rights struggles spawn separate women’s movement (Garcia 1989) z There should be a steady increase in cumulative women’s organizations from 1848 with sharper increase in the late 1960s. Hypotheses z Organizations for women of color are out there, but they don’t have the bodies and $ to be as strong as general feminist organizations. z Due to institutional racism and the whiteness of mainstream feminism, organizations for women of color struggle to catch on. Background on Feminist Movement z Feminist movement- industrialization, urbanization, displacement of female functions out of the home, further education, changing values of women z 1830-1865: Women wanted to get involved in abolitionist movement but couldn’t because they weren’t allowed to speak in public (Freeman 1975) Background z First Wave of feminism- centered around women’s suffrage movement (1890-1920) z “like White men, many White women wanted the power of the vote—exclusively for themselves.” (Taylor 1998, 237) z African American women were pushed out by white suffragists but still remained active in the start-up of the civil rights movement Background z Second Wave of feminism- centered around women’s liberation movement: mid 1960s-70s z Kick started by civil rights movement: 1954- 1965 (Taylor 1998, 239) z “frustration with the contradictions between progressive politics and practice led [women of the civil rights movement] to organize independently against male-dominated institutions” (Minkoff 1997, 783) Second Wave & Women of Color z 1966- National Organization for Women is founded by Betty Friedan, Aileen Hernandez, and Pauli Murray (Taylor 1998, 242) z Portions of NOW were modeled after NAACP z In 1974 10% of NOW members were of color z Prior to 1973 black women’s groups dealt with problems in the black community. Black Women Organized for Action National Black Feminist Organization (Freeman 1975) Black Feminist Organizing z 1973- NBFO held their first conference and were very particular about the attendees z Worked to change beliefs that feminism was only advantageous to white women z Pressured NOW to include issues of women of color and poor white women z Most influential group in the struggle were lesbians (Taylor 1998) After the protests… z Late 1970s: sharp increase in density of organizations z Mass membership associations z Specialized groups z Single-issue groups z Traditional women’s groups z “Unobtrusive” mobilization (Katzenstein 1990) (Minkoff 1997) Methods z Associations Unlimited z Subject descriptor “women” & “feminism” z Only national organizations z 627 total z 362 feminist z 58 women of color z Coded for founding date, staff size, budget, what racial group the org focused on, and whether or not the org was feminist Codebook z 0=general feminist z 1=Black z 2=Hispanic z 3=Asian z 4=Middle Eastern z 6=general minority focus z 7=American Indian z Feminist: promotes equity; physical, mental and emotional wellbeing; integrate into church; women’s health policy; advocacy Minority Focus Women's Organizations 25 20 15 10 5 0 Af-Am Hispanic Asian Middle General American Eas ter n Minority Indian All Women’s Groups: N=566 600 500 400 Cumulative Women's Groups 300 200 100 0 1844 1883 1895 1908 1918 1927 1935 1944 1951 35 1960 30 1968 25 1975 Women's Group Foundings 20 1982 15 1989 10 1996 5 0 1844 1883 1895 1908 1918 1927 1935 1944 1951 1960 1968 1975 1982 1989 1996 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 2 4 6 8 1858 Women ofColor: N=49 General Feminist: N=324 1890 1899 1916 1921 1928 1938 Foundings Feminist 1946 1951 1956 1963 1967 1971 1975 1979 1983 1987 1991 1995 1 2 3 4 5 6 1858 1935 1952 1969 Women of Foundings Color Women 1972 1975 1977 1980 1982 1984 1986 1991 1993 1995 Aggregated Budget Aggregated Staff Size Entire Sample $434,482,143.00 4,746 Feminist $203,403,556.00 2,564 Non-Feminist $231,078,587.00 2,182 Women of Color $14,788,230.00 237 z Feminist Organizations z 47% of aggregated budget z 54% of aggregated staff z Average Org: $562,000; 7 staff members z Women of Color Organizations z 3.4% of aggregated budget z 5% of aggregated staff z Average Org: $255,000; 4 staff members Women's Org Budgets 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 under $25,000 $25,000 to $100,001 to $500,001 to over $100,000 $500,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Feminist Budgets Women of Color Budgets 40 8 35 7 30 6 25 5 20 4 15 3 10 2 5 1 0 0 under $25,000 to $100,001 to $500,001 to over under $25,000 to $100,001 to $500,001 to over $25,000 $100,000 $500,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $25,000 $100,000 $500,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Staff Sizes, Women's Organizations 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 Zero or One 2-4 5-7 8-10 More than missing 10 Staff Sizes, Feminist Staff Sizes, Women of Color 180 35 160 30 140 120 25 100 20 80 15 60 10 40 20 5 0 0 Zero or One 2-4 5-7 8-10 More than Zero or One 2-4 5-7 8-10 More than missing 10 missing 10 Analysis part 2 z Chose around 15 large women of color organizations to profile z Encyclopedia of Associations – every 5 years (1970- present) z Membership z Staff z Budget z Issues z Goal was to see how issues changed over the course of the organizations history Why it didn’t work z Needed to work forward in time instead of backward z High mortality rate of organizations when looking back z Insanely time consuming z Many entries that did show up in many editions also stayed exactly the same Other Issues z Founding black women’s organizations aren’t in the Encyclopedia so I wonder what else is missing z I would have liked to do the same sort of analyses with civil rights organizations z Out of all feminist organizations, 230 are missing budget information and 157 are missing staff information z There is no research on this topic Interpretations z All the literature backs up that the civil rights movement opened the door for the women’s liberation movement. I couldn’t separate them if I tried. z Women’s organizations do begin increasing in numbers after Seneca Falls z Feminist organization foundings also seem linked to historical events- 19th Amendment, Civil Rights Act, founding of landmark organizations z Organizations for women of color increase after the Second Wave of feminism begins. In response to racism within the movement? Further Interpretations z It appears that women of color organizations do actually have the staff to keep the orgs running, they just lack funding z Women of color are less likely to have the time and $ to devote to worrying about social issues (Freeman 1975) z Donors tend to be wealthy whites (Ostrander 1999) z Since my part 2 analyses didn’t quite work it is obviously that women of color organizations do struggle to keep going Conclusions z Feminism is a very white movement z Organizations for women of color are out there, they follow similar patterns to general feminist organizations, but they encounter more roadblocks z It would be very interesting to trace how major feminist organizations issues have changed. z Perhaps issues concerning women of color have been incorporated more recently? Hence the mortality of many organizations. Bibliography Associations Unlimited Online Database. 2003. Gale Research Co. http://www.galegroup.com/. Feminist Pedagogy Resources and Tools. 2003. OSU Women’s Studies Dept. http://www.womens- studies.ohio-state.edu/pedagogy/Teaching/timeline.html. Freeman, Jo. 1975. The Politics of Women’s Liberation. New York: David McKay Company, Inc. Gale Research Company. 1970-2002. Encyclopedia of Associations. Vol 1, National Organizations. Detroit: Gale Research Co. Garcia, Alma. 1989. “The Development of Chicana Feminist Discourse, 1970-1980.” Gender and Society 3: 217-238. Hunter, Andrea. 1998. “Feminist Attitudes among African American Women and Men.” Gender and Society 12: 81-99. Katzenstein, Mary. 1990. “Feminism within Institutions: Unobtrusive Mobilization in the 1980s.” Signs 16: 27-54. Minkoff, Debra. 1997. “The Sequencing of Social Movements.” American Sociological Review 62: 779- 799. Ostrander, Susan. 1999. “Gender and Race in a Pro-Feminist, Progressive, Mixed-Gender, Mixed- Race Organization.” Gender and Society 13: 628-642. Scott, Ellen. 1998. “Creating Partnerships for Change: Alliances and Betrayals in the Racial Politics of Two Feminist Organizations.” Gender and Society 12: 400-423. Taylor, Ula. 1998. “The Historical Evolution of Black Feminist Theory and Praxis.” Journal of Black Studies 29: 234-253..
Recommended publications
  • Ecofeminism: an Overview Difficult for Women in Such Societies to Provide Food, Fuel, Or 14 Lois Ann Lorentzen, University of San Francisco & Water
    Ecofeminism: An Overview difficult for women in such societies to provide food, fuel, or 14 Lois Ann Lorentzen, University of San Francisco & water. Empirical data supports this claim. Heather Eaton, Saint Paul University A second claim is that women and nature are connected Ecofeminism is an activist and academic movement that sees conceptually and/or culturally/symbolically. These connections are critical connections between the domination of nature and the articulated in several ways. Many agree with Ruether that Western exploitation of women. The term ecofeminism, first used by French cultures present ideas about the world in a hierarchical and feminist Francoise d’Eaubonne1 in 1974, was hailed as the third dualistic manner that is lived out in the way the world is organized. wave of feminism. Ecofeminism, as Karen Warren notes,2 is an The claim is that dualist conceptual structures identify women with umbrella term for a wide variety of approaches. One may be a femininity, the body, Earth, sexuality, and flesh; and men with socialist ecofeminist, cultural ecofeminist, radical ecofeminist, masculinity, spirit, mind, and power. Dualisms such as ecowomanist, etc. Although the categorization of ecofeminism is a reason/emotion, mind/body, culture/nature, heaven/Earth, and contested point, what holds these disparate positions together is the man/woman converge. This implies that men have innate power claim that, as Karen Warren writes, “there are important over both women and nature. This dualistic structure was connections between the domination of women and the domination championed in the Greek world, perpetuated by Christianity, and of nature.”3 reinforced later during the scientific revolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Historicizing the “End of Men”: the Politics of Reaction(S)
    HISTORICIZING THE “END OF MEN”: THE POLITICS OF REACTION(S) ∗ SERENA MAYERI In fact, the most distinctive change is probably the emergence of an American matriarchy, where the younger men especially are unmoored, and closer than at any other time in history to being obsolete . – Hanna Rosin1 In 1965 a Labor Department official named Daniel Patrick Moynihan wrote a report entitled The Negro Family: The Case for National Action (the Moynihan Report), intended only for internal Johnson Administration use but quickly leaked to the press.2 Designed to motivate the President and his deputies to launch massive federal employment and anti-poverty initiatives directed at impoverished African Americans, Moynihan’s report inadvertently sparked a sometimes vitriolic debate that reverberated through the next half century of social policy.3 Characterized as everything from a “subtle racist”4 to a “prescient”5 prophet, Moynihan and his assessment of black urban family life have been endlessly analyzed, vilified, and rehabilitated by commentators in the years since his report identified a “tangle of pathology” that threatened the welfare and stability of poor African American communities.6 At the center of the “pathology” Moynihan lamented was a “matriarchal” family structure characterized by “illegitimate” births, welfare dependency, and juvenile ∗ Professor of Law and History, University of Pennsylvania Law School. I am grateful to Kristin Collins for helpful comments on an earlier draft of this Essay; to Linda McClain, Hanna Rosin, and participants in the Conference, “Evaluating Claims About the ‘End of Men’: Legal and Other Perspectives,” out of which this Symposium grew; and to the staff of the Boston University Law Review for editorial assistance.
    [Show full text]
  • Responding to Change: Girl Scouts, Race, and the Feminist Movement Phyllis E
    University of Wisconsin Milwaukee UWM Digital Commons Theses and Dissertations December 2018 Responding to Change: Girl Scouts, Race, and the Feminist Movement Phyllis E. Reske University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.uwm.edu/etd Part of the African American Studies Commons, United States History Commons, and the Women's Studies Commons Recommended Citation Reske, Phyllis E., "Responding to Change: Girl Scouts, Race, and the Feminist Movement" (2018). Theses and Dissertations. 2012. https://dc.uwm.edu/etd/2012 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by UWM Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of UWM Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. RESPONDING TO CHANGE: GIRL SCOUTS, RACE, AND THE FEMINIST MOVEMENT by Phyllis E. Reske A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in History at The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee December 2018 ABSTRACT REACTING TO CHANGE: GIRL SCOUTS AND THE FEMINIST MOVEMENT by Phyllis E. Reske The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2018 Under the Supervision of Professor Joseph Rodriguez The purpose of the Girl Scouts of the United States of America (GSUSA) is to teach girls to be giving, self-sufficient, and independent in their homes and communities through volunteer work and earning merit badges. Open to all girls since its inception, the GSUSA offers Girl Scouts training in both gender-conforming and nontraditional vocations. However, during the first half of the twentieth century, segregation and domesticity was emphasized in American society.
    [Show full text]
  • Changemakers: Biographies of African Americans in San Francisco Who Made a Difference
    The University of San Francisco USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center Leo T. McCarthy Center for Public Service and McCarthy Center Student Scholarship the Common Good 2020 Changemakers: Biographies of African Americans in San Francisco Who Made a Difference David Donahue Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.usfca.edu/mccarthy_stu Part of the History Commons CHANGEMAKERS AFRICAN AMERICANS IN SAN FRANCISCO WHO MADE A DIFFERENCE Biographies inspired by San Francisco’s Ella Hill Hutch Community Center murals researched, written, and edited by the University of San Francisco’s Martín-Baró Scholars and Esther Madríz Diversity Scholars CHANGEMAKERS: AFRICAN AMERICANS IN SAN FRANCISCO WHO MADE A DIFFERENCE © 2020 First edition, second printing University of San Francisco 2130 Fulton Street San Francisco, CA 94117 Published with the generous support of the Walter and Elise Haas Fund, Engage San Francisco, The Leo T. McCarthy Center for Public Service and the Common Good, The University of San Francisco College of Arts and Sciences, University of San Francisco Student Housing and Residential Education The front cover features a 1992 portrait of Ella Hill Hutch, painted by Eugene E. White The Inspiration Murals were painted in 1999 by Josef Norris, curated by Leonard ‘Lefty’ Gordon and Wendy Nelder, and supported by the San Francisco Arts Commission and the Mayor’s Offi ce Neighborhood Beautifi cation Project Grateful acknowledgment is made to the many contributors who made this book possible. Please see the back pages for more acknowledgments. The opinions expressed herein represent the voices of students at the University of San Francisco and do not necessarily refl ect the opinions of the University or our sponsors.
    [Show full text]
  • The Feminist Movement By: Emera Cooper What Is Feminism? and What Do Feminists Do?
    The Feminist Movement By: Emera Cooper What is Feminism? And what do feminists do? Feminism is the advocacy of women's rights on the basis of the equality of the sexes. ★ Work to level the playing field between genders ★ Ensure that women and girls have the same opportunities in life available to boys and men ★ Gain overall respect for women’s experiences, identities, knowledge and strengths ★ Challenge the systemic inequalities women face on a daily basis History behind the Feminist Movement First wave feminism (property and voting rights): In 1848, Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Lucretia Mott hosted the Seneca Falls Convention where they proclaimed their Declaration of Sentiments. From that we have the famous quote, “We hold these truths to be self-evident; that all men and women are created equal”. They also demanded the right to vote. The women's suffrage movement had begun. With the exceptional work done by women during WWI, the 19th Amendment was passed granting women the right to vote. Women began to enter the workplace following The Great Depression. Women had active roles in the military during WWII. Following the Civil Rights movement, the Equal Pay Act was passed in 1963 to begin to address the unequal pay women in the workplace faced. Second wave feminism (equality and discrimination): In 1971, feminist Gloria Steinem joined Betty Friedan and Bella Abzug in founding the National Women’s Political Caucus. During this time many people had started referring to feminism as “women’s liberation.” In 1972 the Equal Rights Amendment was passed and women gained legal equality and discrimination of sex was banned.
    [Show full text]
  • Cashing in on “Girl Power”: the Commodification of Postfeminist Ideals in Advertising
    CASHING IN ON “GIRL POWER”: THE COMMODIFICATION OF POSTFEMINIST IDEALS IN ADVERTISING _______________________________________ A Thesis presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School at the University of Missouri-Columbia _______________________________________________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts _____________________________________________________ by MARY JANE ROGERS Dr. Cristina Mislán, Thesis Supervisor DECEMBER 2017 © Copyright by Mary Jane Allison Rogers 2017 All Rights Reserved The undersigned, appointed by the dean of the Graduate School, have examined the thesis entitled CASHING IN ON “GIRL POWER”: THE COMMODIFICATION OF POSTFEMINIST IDEALS IN ADVERTISING presented by Mary Jane Rogers, a candidate for the degree of master of arts, and hereby certify that, in their opinion, it is worthy of acceptance. Professor Cristina Mislán Professor Cynthia Frisby Professor Amanda Hinnant Professor Mary Jo Neitz CASHING IN ON “GIRL POWER” ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS My utmost gratitude goes to my advisor, Dr. Cristina Mislán, for supporting me throughout this process. She honed my interest in critically studying gender issues in the media, and her guidance, honesty and encouragement are the reasons I was able to develop the conclusions presented in this paper. I would also like to thank Dr. Amanda Hinnant, Dr. Cynthia Frisby, and Dr. Mary Jo Neitz for their immensely helpful suggestions before and during the research process of this study. Their enthusiasm and guidance was incredibly meaningful, especially during the developmental stages of my research. Additionally, I would like to thank my friends and family for their ongoing support. Special mention needs to be made of Mallory, my cheerleader and motivator from the first day of graduate school, and my Dad and Mom, who have been there since the beginning.
    [Show full text]
  • Women's Liberation: Seeing the Revolution Clearly
    Sara M. EvanS Women’s Liberation: Seeing the Revolution Clearly Approximately fifty members of the five Chicago radical women’s groups met on Saturday, May 18, 1968, to hold a citywide conference. The main purposes of the conference were to create and strengthen ties among groups and individuals, to generate a heightened sense of common history and purpose, and to provoke imaginative pro- grammatic ideas and plans. In other words, the conference was an early step in the process of movement building. —Voice of Women’s Liberation Movement, June 19681 EvEry account of thE rE-EmErgEncE of feminism in the United States in the late twentieth century notes the ferment that took place in 1967 and 1968. The five groups meeting in Chicago in May 1968 had, for instance, flowered from what had been a single Chicago group just a year before. By the time of the conference in 1968, activists who used the term “women’s liberation” understood themselves to be building a movement. Embedded in national networks of student, civil rights, and antiwar movements, these activists were aware that sister women’s liber- ation groups were rapidly forming across the country. Yet despite some 1. Sarah Boyte (now Sara M. Evans, the author of this article), “from Chicago,” Voice of the Women’s Liberation Movement, June 1968, p. 7. I am grateful to Elizabeth Faue for serendipitously sending this document from the first newsletter of the women’s liberation movement created by Jo Freeman. 138 Feminist Studies 41, no. 1. © 2015 by Feminist Studies, Inc. Sara M. Evans 139 early work, including my own, the particular formation calling itself the women’s liberation movement has not been the focus of most scholar- ship on late twentieth-century feminism.
    [Show full text]
  • E Cnronicie Cloudy Thursday with High Cents
    The Pep Board will Warming be selling bus tickets Sunny and mild today, high in upper 5 0's. Increasing to the Carolina game cloudiness tonight, low today on the main mid-to-upper 30's, with 20% quad, from 11 a.m. to chance of rain tonight. Partly 3 p.m. Cost is 75 e cnronicie cloudy Thursday with high cents. TZFWih Volume 66, Number 47 Durham, North Carolina Wednesday, November 18^1970 UFC accepts recognition of double major on record By Glenn Reichardt Academics Reporter Double majors will now be noted on the official records of students who have completed the requirements for both, in compliance with a unanimous decision of the Undergraduate Faculty Council last Thursday. This marks the first time that the University nas recognized a double major. Jane Philpott, Woman's College dean of undergraduate instruction and secretary of the UFC, said in an interview yesterday afternoon, "No one has worked out the mechanics involved with a double major, but the principle has been clearly accepted." According to Philpott, Registrar Clark Cahow, in an "off-the-cuff" remark, said a double major would entitle a student to a major's privileges in each department in which he was pursuing ^a major. These privileges would involve immodiately." Philpott said, The double major proposal was the spaces in upper level courses According to Philpott, Cahow presented to the UFC by Professor I Photo by J'" which are reserved for majors. said that a double major could be Bruce Wardropper of the romance Last night's symposium committee meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • R Mohawk Valley NOW Presents
    NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR WOMEN Non-Profit Organization Mohawk Valley Chapter US Postage Paid P.O. Box 1066 Utica, NY Utica, NY 13503 Permit 1612 Address Correction Requested Kate Oser 1055 South St. 9-. ~ 2... ~o,>:. \OSS C\'-cv,..o<" C'l~ \~">'2..~ r Mohawk Valley NOW presents ... /1 NOW'S 20TH ANNIVERSARY SHOW ) On Videocassette Live from the Dorothy Chandler Pavilion < More than 100 actors and entertainers committed their talents to NOW's 20th Anniversary celebration which was marked by a live, two-hour show on December 1 at the Dorothy Chandler Pavilion in Los Angeles, produced by Peg Yorkin and Susan Dietz and directed by Anne Commire. Written by Doris Baizley and Ms. Commire based on the 20-year chronology of NOW's history compiled by Toni Carabillo and Judith Meuli, the show is a moving and funny, informative and entertaining, and fast-paced blend of history and entertainment. It's a serious, yet humorous account of some of the events and actions that changed women's lives since NOW's founding in 1966. Interspersed between celebrities describing landmark events, there is archival film, two major film essays narrated by Marlo Thomas (one on the Vermont state ERA campaign and one on Title IX), a monologue by lily Tomlin, a stirring speech by NOW's president, Eleanor Smeal, and she musical numbers accompanied by a 31-piece orchestra conducted by Peter Matz, including: "Miss Celie's Blues" performed by Mariette Hartley "I Am Woman" performed by Helen Reddy "Sisters Are Doing It For Themselves" performed by Mara Getz & Alaina Reed "All Girl Band" performed by Edie Adams, Alaina Reed, Jackee Harry Medley of "girl" songs performed by the NOW Broadway Chorus "Together We Can Make The Dream Come True" performed by Melissa Manchester written especially for the snow by Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • FEMINISM of ALICE PAUL in IRON JAWED ANGELS MOVIE 1Firdha Rachman, 2Imam Safrudi Sastra Inggris STIBA NUSA MANDIRI Jl. Ir. H. Ju
    FEMINISM OF ALICE PAUL IN IRON JAWED ANGELS MOVIE 1Firdha Rachman, 2Imam Safrudi Sastra Inggris STIBA NUSA MANDIRI Jl. Ir. H. Juanda No. 39 Ciputat. Tangerang Selatan [email protected] ABSTRACT Most of women in the world are lack support for fundamental functions of a human life. They are less well nourished than men, less healthy, more vulnerable to physical violence and sexual abuse. They are much less likely than men to be literate, and still less likely to have professional or technical education. The objectives of this analysis are: (1) to know the characterization of Alice Paul as the main Character in Iron Jawed Angels Movie. (2) to find out the type of feminism in the main character. The method used is descriptive qualitative method and library research to collect the data and theories. The result of this thesis indicated that Alice has some great characterization such as smart, independent, brave, a great motivator, and educated woman. The type of her feminism in the main character is Liberal Feminism. Keywords: Feminism, Characterization, IRON JAWED ANGELS Movie I. INTRODUCTION the laws were made by men, women were not Most of women in the world are lack allowed to vote. They were always seen as a support for fundamental functions of a human certain role and known as the property. It life. They are less well nourished than men, less means, men thought women had things to do healthy, more vulnerable to physical violence like taking care of their children. It was difficult and sexual abuse. They are much less likely for women to fit in the society.
    [Show full text]
  • California's ERA Ratification and Women's Policy Activism
    “The Time Was Right to Generate Some Heat”: California’s ERA Ratification and Women’s Policy Activism Western Association of Political Scientists San Diego, CA April 18 - 20, 2019 Doreen J. Mattingly, Professor and Chair Department of Women’s Studies, San Diego State University [email protected] 1 “The Time Was Right to Generate Some Heat”: California’s ERA Ratification and Women’s Policy Activism Abstract In California, the 1972 campaign to ratify the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) to the United States constitution pitted amendment supporters against labor leaders trying to protect women- only protective labor laws. The seven-month struggle campaign in California resulted in a vote for ratification and motivated several years of legislative activity on women’s issues. Most scholarship about ERA ratification in the US in the 1970s examines the reasons the amendment failed; this paper takes a different tack by investigating a state where the ERA was successful. The ERA campaign was a key element in the embrace of women’s issues by the state’s Democratic Party. This paper also provides an in-depth analysis of the relationship between labor feminists and equal rights feminists, two groups that were opposed during the ratification campaign, but were frequent allies on women’s issues before and after 1972. Introduction Through the 1970s, women’s groups tried unsuccessfully to achieve the ratification of the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA), which would have instituted an explicit constitutional prohibition on sex discrimination. On March 22, 1972, the US Congress passed the ERA and sent it to the states for ratification, and in 1982 the ERA failed, three states short of the 38 needed to add the amendment to the constitution.1 After a long battle, California became the twenty-second state to ratify the amendment on November 13, 1972.
    [Show full text]
  • Women's Movement: the History and Timeline 1500S
    WST 101: Women’s Studies Learning Unit 1: Handout Women’s Movement: The History and Timeline 1500s – 1600s Our country was founded by a group from England called the Puritans. They were known to be so religiously conservative that they were asked to leave England for the new world. Think about the story you know of Thanksgiving. This was the foundation for our country and for the status and treatment of women in our country. The Puritans believed: Social order lay in the authority of husband The First Thanksgiving at Plymouth over wife, parents over children, and masters by Jennie A. Brownscombe over servants. Women could not own property and lost their civil birth identity when they became married. A woman’s salvation (place in heaven) was ensured by the goodness exhibited in her children. The home was the only place women were allowed to exercise discipline. In public, they deferred to their husband or the patriarchy of the church and community. 1701 The first sexually integrated jury hears cases in Albany, New York. This was a social change despite the fact that women were generally excluded from civic responsibilities and legal activities of the time. 1769 The American colonies based their laws on English Common Law, which is what they were familiar with. English Common Law stated: “By marriage, the husband and wife are one person under law. The very being and legal existence of the woman is suspended during the marriage, or at least incorporated into that of her husband under whose wing and protection she performs everything.” 1774 Colonial delegates – all men – gather to discuss the treatment they were receiving from their Mother Country (England).
    [Show full text]