DOCSLIB.ORG

NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS T O F C E N O M M T M R E A R P C E E D FEBRUARY 2011 U N A I C T I E R D E M ST A AT E S OF HISTORICAL OCCURRENCE OF COHO SALMON (Oncorhynchus kisutch) IN STREAMS OF THE SANTA CRUZ MOUNTAIN REGION OF CALIFORNIA: RESPONSE TO AN ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT PETITION TO DELIST COHO SALMON SOUTH OF SAN FRANCISCO BAY Brian C. Spence Walter G. Duffy John Carlos Garza Bret C. Harvey Susan M. Sogard Laurie A. Weitkamp Thomas H. Williams and David A. Boughton NOAA-TM-NMFS-SWFSC-472 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Marine Fisheries Service Southwest Fisheries Science Center The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), organized in 1970, has evolved into an agency that establishes national policies and manages and conserves our oceanic, coastal, and atmospheric resources. An organizational element within NOAA, the Office of Fisheries is responsible for fisheries policy and the direction of the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). In addition to its formal publications, the NMFS uses the NOAA Technical Memorandum series to issue informal scientific and technical publications when complete formal review and editorial processing are not appropriate or feasible. Documents within this series, however, reflect sound professional work and may be referenced in the formal scientific and technical literature. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS This TM series is used for documentation and timely communication of preliminary results, interim reports, or special purpose information. The TMs have not received complete formal review, editorial control, or detailed editing. FEBRUARY 2011 HISTORICAL OCCURRENCE OF COHO SALMON (Oncorhynchus kisutch) IN STREAMS OF THE SANTA CRUZ MOUNTAIN REGION OF CALIFORNIA: RESPONSE TO AN ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT PETITION TO DELIST COHO SALMON SOUTH OF SAN FRANCISCO BAY Brian C. Spence1,Walter G. Duffy2, John Carlos Garza1, Bret C. Harvey3, Susan M. Sogard1, Laurie A. Weitkamp4, Thomas H. Williams1, and David A. Boughton1 1 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Marine Fisheries Service Southwest Fisheries Science Center, Fisheries Ecology Division 110 Shaffer Road, Santa Cruz, California 95060 2 U.S. Geological Survey, California Cooperative Research Unit, Humboldt State University, Arcata, California 3 U.S. Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Redwood Sciences Laboratory, Arcata, California 4 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Marine Fisheries Service Northwest Fisheries Science Center, Conservation Biology Program, Newport, Oregon NOAA-TM-NMFS-SWFSC-472 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Gary F. Locke, Secretary National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Jane Lubchenco, Under Secretary for Oceans and Atmosphere National Marine Fisheries Service Eric C. Schwaab, Assistant Administrator for Fisheries Table of Contents List of Figures................................................................................................................................. v List of Tables ................................................................................................................................. vi Executive summary....................................................................................................................... vii 1. Introduction................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Central California Coast Coho Salmon listing history ......................................................... 1 1.2 Overview of petition to delist coho salmon south of San Francisco..................................... 2 1.3 Purpose of the BRT report .................................................................................................... 4 2. Original (1995) ESU boundary definition for CCC Coho Salmon............................................. 7 3. Biological organization and structure of salmon ESUs .............................................................. 9 3.1 Terms .................................................................................................................................... 9 3.2 Demographic processes ...................................................................................................... 11 3.3 TRT findings on population structure and demographic processes in the CCC Coho Salmon ESU.............................................................................................................................. 12 3.4 Response to petition............................................................................................................ 14 4. Environmental template and history of the Santa Cruz Mountain region ................................ 19 4.1 Ecosystem characteristics in the Santa Cruz Mountains..................................................... 19 4.2 Environmental history of the Santa Cruz Mountains.......................................................... 25 4.3 Response to petition............................................................................................................ 30 5. History of artificial propagation and release of coho salmon in streams south of San Francisco ....................................................................................................................................................... 35 5.1 Coho salmon stocking history prior to 1906....................................................................... 35 5.2 Stocking of Baker Lake coho salmon: 1906–1910............................................................. 38 5.3 Stocking of coho salmon in Santa Cruz Mountain streams from 1911 to 1941 ................. 39 5.4 Post-1941 hatchery activities .............................................................................................. 41 5.5 Response to petition............................................................................................................ 43 Could coho salmon observed prior to 1906 have been the result of hatchery plantings?.... 43 Could the Baker Lake and subsequent introductions account for coho salmon populations that were present during the 1930s?..................................................................................... 44 6. Genetic data related to the southern boundary of CCC Coho Salmon ..................................... 49 6.1 Genetic datasets .................................................................................................................. 49 Bjorkstedt et al. (2005) ......................................................................................................... 49 Garza and Gilbert-Horvath, unpublished data..................................................................... 51 Garza et al. in prep ............................................................................................................... 52 Bucklin et al. 2007 ................................................................................................................ 53 Garza et al. unpublished....................................................................................................... 54 Pearse et al. in press............................................................................................................. 55 6.2 Summary of inference provided by genetic data ................................................................ 58 iii 6.3 Response to petition............................................................................................................ 59 7. Historical evidence of salmon in streams and rivers south of San Francisco........................... 61 7.1 Early explorations of coastal California fish faunas........................................................... 61 7.2 Taxonomy and nomenclature of Pacific salmonids in the 19th century.............................. 64 7.3 Knowledge of Pacific salmon life histories in the 19th century .......................................... 70 7.4 Evidence of anadromous salmonids in streams south of San Francisco Bay ..................... 71 Evidence prior to 1880.......................................................................................................... 71 The writings of Jordan and Gilbert, 1881–1894 .................................................................. 75 The 1895 Carmel River Expedition....................................................................................... 78 The writings of Jordan and Evermann, 1896–1908.............................................................. 78 Newspaper accounts of salmon in Santa Cruz Mountain streams........................................ 79 7.5 Response to petition............................................................................................................ 79 The writings of David Starr Jordan...................................................................................... 82 Newspaper accounts of Baker Lake coho salmon introduction............................................ 85 Conclusions........................................................................................................................... 86 8. Archaeological evidence for the presence of coho salmon in coastal California South of San Francisco Bay................................................................................................................................ 87 8.1 Review of archaeological evidence ...................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Flood Insurance?
    Safe, Clean Water and Natural Flood Protection Program The passage of the Safe, Clean Water and Natural Flood Protection Program in 2012 has made the community’s long term goals for protecting the future of the Santa Clara Valley possible, including: • Supplying safe, healthy water • Retrofitting dams and critical infrastructure for earthquakes • Reducing toxins, hazards and contaminants • Restoring wildlife habitat in our waterways • Providing natural flood protection Even though we are in a drought, flooding can happen. Santa Clara County has had several damaging floods over the years, Extreme dry conditions can harden the ground. Within the first few most notably in 1995 and 1997 along the Guadalupe River and 1998 days of heavy rain, the ground can deflect water into streams and along Coyote and San Francisquito creeks. Call your city’s floodplain creeks, increasing the chances of flash flooding. It can strike quickly manager or the Santa Clara Valley Water District’s Community with little or no warning. Projects Unit at 408.630.2650 to determine if you are in a floodplain. Floodwater can flow swiftly through neighborhoods and away from The water district’s flood prevention and flood awareness outreach streams when creeks “overbank” or flood. Dangerously fast-moving efforts reduce flood insurance rates by as much as 10 percent. FEMA’s floodwaters can flow thousands of feet away from the flooded creek National Flood Insurance Program Community Rating System (CRS) within minutes. evaluates the flood protection efforts that CRS communities make and provides a rating. While the chances may seem slim for a 1 percent flood* to occur, the real odds of a 1 percent flood are greater than one in four during the In our area, *participating CRS communities (noted on the magnet) earn length of a 30-year mortgage.
    [Show full text]
  • D.W. ALLEY & Associates Aquatic Biology
    D.W. ALLEY & Associates Aquatic Biology -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2006 Juvenile Steelhead Densities in the San Lorenzo, Soquel, Aptos and Corralitos Watersheds, Santa Cruz County, California Coastrange Sculpin Photographed by Jessica Wheeler D.W. ALLEY & Associates, Aquatic Biology Don Alley, Chad Steiner and Jerry Smith, Fishery Biologists With Field Assistance from Kristen Kittleson, Dawn Reis and Jessica Wheeler Prepared For the Santa Cruz County Environmental Health Department Government Center, 701 Ocean Street, Room 312, Santa Cruz, CA 95060 Funding From the San Lorenzo Valley Water District, Soquel Creek Water District, Lompico County Water District, Cities of Santa Cruz and Watsonville and the County of Santa Cruz May 2007 Project # 200-04 340 Old River Lane • P.O. Box 200 • Brookdale, California 95007 • (831) 338-7971 TABLE OF CONTENTS REPORT SUMMARY...................................................................................10 INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................31 I-1. Steelhead and Coho Salmon Ecology...................................................... 31 I-3. Project Purpose and General Study Approach ........................................ 34 METHODS ....................................................................................................35 M-1. Choice of Reaches and Vicinity of Sites to be Sampled- Methods........... 35 M-2. Classification of Habitat Types and Measurement of Habitat Characteristics.............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Memorial Sam Mcdonald Pescadero
    Topher Simon Topher permitted in trail camps. trail in permitted water is available at trail camps. Backpack stoves are are stoves Backpack camps. trail at available is water who register with the ranger at Memorial Park. No No Park. Memorial at ranger the with register who snakes, and banana slugs. banana and snakes, available for a fee on a drop-in basis for backpackers backpackers for basis drop-in a on fee a for available woodpeckers, Steller’s jays, garter snakes, gopher gopher snakes, garter jays, Steller’s woodpeckers, hikes passing through multiple parks. multiple through passing hikes Trail camps camps Trail at Shaw Flat and Tarwater Flat are are Flat Tarwater and Flat Shaw at tailed deer, raccoons, opossums, foxes, bobcats, bobcats, foxes, opossums, raccoons, deer, tailed State Park, offering the opportunity for several long long several for opportunity the offering Park, State Common wildlife in Sam McDonald includes black- includes McDonald Sam in wildlife Common Trailheads. The trail network also connects to Big Basin Redwoods Redwoods Basin Big to connects also network trail The State Park, and at the Old Haul Road and Tarwater Tarwater and Road Haul Old the at and Park, State leaf maple, and oak trees. oak and maple, leaf a number of trails with Portola Redwoods State Park Park State Redwoods Portola with trails of number a Ranger Station, Portola Trailhead, Portola Redwoods Redwoods Portola Trailhead, Portola Station, Ranger Douglas fir, madrone, California laurel, buckeye, big big buckeye, laurel, California madrone, fir, Douglas Pescadero Creek Park shares its eastern boundary and and boundary eastern its shares Park Creek Pescadero inter-park trail network trail inter-park from the Sam McDonald McDonald Sam the from The forests, dominated by coast redwood, also include include also redwood, coast by dominated forests, The rugged beauty offers a true escape.
    [Show full text]
  • 1180 Main Street Project, Cultural Resources Inventory and Evaluation Report, Redwood City, San Mateo County, California
    1180 Main Street Project, Cultural Resources Inventory and Evaluation Report, Redwood City, San Mateo County, California Prepared for: Premia Capital, LLC 801 Hamilton Street Redwood City, CA Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. January 18, 2019 1180 MAIN STREET PROJECT, CULTURAL RESOURCES INVENTORY AND EVALUATION REPORT, REDWOOD CITY, SAN MATEO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA This document entitled 1180 Main Street Project, Cultural Resources Inventory and Evaluation Report, Redwood City, San Mateo County, California was prepared by Stantec Inc. (“Stantec”) for the account of Premia Capital, LLC (the “Client”). Any reliance on this document by any third party is strictly prohibited. The material in it reflects Stantec’s professional judgment in light of the scope, schedule and other limitations stated in the document and in the contract between Stantec and the Client. The opinions in the document are based on conditions and information existing at the time the document was published and do not take into account any subsequent changes. In preparing the document, Stantec did not verify information supplied to it by others. Any use which a third party makes of this document is the responsibility of such third party. Such third party agrees that Stantec shall not be responsible for costs or damages of any kind, if any, suffered by it or any other third party as a result of decisions made or actions taken based on this document. Prepared by (signature) Joanne Grant, Archaeologist, MA, RPA Reviewed by (signature) John A. Nadolski, M.A. Approved
    [Show full text]
  • San Lorenzo Urban River Plan
    San Lorenzo Urban River Plan A Plan for the San Lorenzo River, Branciforte Creek and Jessie Street Marsh Prepared by: City of Santa Cruz San Lorenzo Urban River Plan Task Force with assistance from Rivers, Trails and Conservation Assistance Program of the National Park Service Adopted June 24, 2003 Table of Contents Acknowledgements 3 Executive Summary 5 Chapter 19 Purpose, Context and Goals 1.1 Purpose of the San Lorenzo Urban River Plan 9 1.2 Goals and Benefits of the Plan 10 1.3 The Planning Area and River Reach Descriptions 10 1.4 Relationship to Existing City Plans 13 1.5 Plan Organization 13 Chapter 2 15 Plan Setting and Background 2.1 Physical Setting 15 2.2 Social Setting: Development of the City of Santa Cruz 17 2.3 The History of Flooding in Santa Cruz 18 2.4 Current Planning and the San Lorenzo Urban River Plan Task Force 19 Chapter 3 21 Riverwide Concepts and Programs 3.1 The San Lorenzo Riverway 21 3.2 Defining the Riverway: System-wide Recommendations 22 Chapter 4 23 Reach Specific Recommendations 4.1 Design Improvements 25 4.2 Site Specific Recommendations in River Reaches 29 Estuarine Reach 29 Transitional Reach 39 Riverine Reach 49 Chapter 5 55 Branciforte Creek 5.1 Area Description and Current Conditions 55 5.2 Reach Specific Recommendations for Branciforte Creek 58 Chapter 6 61 Significant Riverfront Areas 6.1 Front Street Riverfront Area 61 6.2 Salz Tannery to 64 Sycamore Grove Riverfront Area 6.3 Beach Flats Riverfront Area 71 Chapter 7 73 Plan Implementation 7.1 San Lorenzo River Committee 73 Recommendations 74 7.2 Project Phasing and Projected Costs 75 7.3 Funding Opportunities 75 Chapter 8 79 References Appendix A Lower San Lorenzo River and Lagoon Enhancement Plan Appendix B Jessie Street Marsh Management Plan PB SAN LORENZO URBAN RIVER PLAN The San Lorenzo Urban River Plan could Acknowledgements not have been developed without the dedication of the San Lorenzo Urban River Plan Task Force, City staff and the community.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Coast
    Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Background ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Consultation History......................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Proposed Action ............................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Action Area ..................................................................................................................... 32 2. ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT: BIOLOGICAL OPINION AND INCIDENTAL TAKE STATEMENT ......................................................................................................... 34 2.1 Analytical Approach ....................................................................................................... 34 2.2 Life History and Range-wide Status of the Species and Critical Habitat ...................... 35 2.3 Environmental Baseline .................................................................................................. 48 2.4 Effects of the Action ........................................................................................................ 62 2.5 Cumulative Effects .......................................................................................................... 76 2.6 Integration and Synthesis ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • San Mateo County BBE Final Report-2016.11.2
    Assessment and Management Prioritization Regime for the Bar-built Estuaries of San Mateo County Summary Report San Pedro Creek Prepared for: United States Fish and Wildlife Service San Francisco Area Coastal Program by: Central Coast Wetlands Group Moss Landing Marine Labs 8272 Moss Landing Rd. Moss Landing, CA 95039 November 2016 Summary Report: Bar-Built Estuaries of San Mateo County TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................................... 1 Figures and Tables .......................................................................................................................................... 2 Background and Need .................................................................................................................................... 3 What are BBEs and Why are they Important ............................................................................................................ 3 BBE are the most dominant estuarine resource on the San Mateo County coastline .............................................. 4 Purpose ........................................................................................................................................................... 5 Methods .......................................................................................................................................................... 7 Site Selection ............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 203287 Cov Final Vol 1.Ai
    Summary Summary SUMMARY Sections Figures Tables S.1 Introduction and Purpose of S.1 Overview of SFPUC Regional S.1 WSIP Goals and Objectives the PEIR System and Water Supply Watersheds S.2 WSIP Facility Improvement S.2 Program Description Projects S.2 SFPUC Water Service Area – S.3 Environmental Effects San Francisco and SFPUC S.3 Summary of WSIP Facility Construction and Operation S.4 Areas of Controversy and Wholesale Customers Impacts Issues to be Resolved S.3 Annual Average Historical and S.4 Summary of Facility Mitigation S.5 Required Actions and Projected Customer Purchase Measures by Impact Approvals Requests S.5 Summary of Water Supply Impacts S.6 WSIP Variants S.4 WSIP Water Supply Sources, Nondrought Years and Mitigation Measures – S.7 Alternatives to the Proposed Tuolumne River System and Program S.5 WSIP Water Supply Sources, Downstream Water Bodies Drought Years S.6 Summary of Water Supply Impacts S.6a Location of WSIP Facility and Mitigation Measures – Improvement Projects – Sunol Alameda Creek Watershed Valley, Bay Division, Peninsula, and San Francisco Regions S.7 Summary of Water Supply Impacts and Mitigation Measures – S.6b Location of WSIP Facility Peninsula Watersheds Improvement Projects – San Joaquin Region S.8 Summary of Water Supply Impacts and Mitigation Measures – S.6c Location of WSIP Facility Westside Groundwater Basin Improvement Projects – Hetch Hetchy Region S.9 Summary of Water Supply Impacts and Mitigation Measures – S.7 Preliminary WSIP Construction Cumulative Water Supply Schedule S.1 Introduction and Purpose of the PEIR (Chapter 1) The San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC) proposes to adopt and implement the Water System Improvement Program (WSIP or proposed program) to increase the reliability of the regional water system that serves 2.4 million people in San Francisco and the San Francisco Bay Area.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences (4)5
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE CALIFORNIA Academy of Sciences FOURTH SERIES Vol. V 1915 OS" SAN P^RANCISCO PUBLISHED BY THE ACADEMY 1915 COMMITTEE ON PUBLICATION George C. Edwards, Chairman C. E. Grunsky Barton Warren Evermann, Editor CONTENTS OF VOLUME V. Plates 1-19. PAGE Title-page i Contents iii Report of the President of the Academy for the Year 1914. By C. E. Grunsky 1 (Published March 26, 1915) Report of the Director of the Museum for the Year 1914. By Barton Warren Evermann - 1 1 (Published March 26, 1915) Fauna of the Type Tejon : Its Relation to the Cowlitz Phase of the Tejon Group of Washington. By Roy E. Dickerson. (Plates 1-11) 33 (Published June 15, 1915) A List of the Amphibians and Reptiles of Utah, with Notes on the Species in the Collection of the Academy. By John Van Den- burgh and Joseph R. Slevin. (Plates 12-14) 99 (Published June 15, 1915) Description of a New Subgenus (Arborimus) of Phenacomys, with a Contribution to Knowledge of the Habits and Distribution of Phenacomys longicaudus True. By Walter P. Taylor. (Plate 15) 1 1 1 (Published December 30, 1915) Tertiary Deposits of Northeastern Mexico. By E. T. Durable. (Plates 16-19) 163 (Published December 31, 1915) Report of the President of the Academy for the Year 1915. By C. E. Grunsky 195 (Published May 4, 1916) Report of the Director of the Museum for the Year 1915. By Barton Warren Evermann 203 (Published May 4, 1916) Index 225, 232 July 19, 1916 / f / ^3 F»ROCEDEDINGS OF THE CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES Fourth Series Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Dean Oz/Μ: ;Z: Date
    The evolutionary history of reproductive strategies in sculpins of the subfamily oligocottinae Item Type Thesis Authors Buser, Thaddaeus J. Download date 26/09/2021 18:39:58 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/11122/4549 THE EVOLUTIONARY HISTORY OF REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGIES IN SCULPINS OF THE SUBFAMILY OLIGOCOTTINAE By Thaddaeus J. Buser RECOMMENDED: Dr. Anne Beaudreau Dr. J. Andres Lopez Advisory Committee Chair Dr. Shannon Atkinson Fisheries Division Graduate Program Chair APPROVED: Dr. Michael Castellini ·. John Eichel erger Dean oZ/µ:_;z: Date THE EVOLUTIONARY HISTORY OF REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGIES IN SCULPINS OF THE SUBFAMILY OLIGOCOTTINAE A THESIS Presented to the Faculty of the University of Alaska Fairbanks in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Title Page MASTER OF SCIENCE By Thaddaeus J. Buser, B.Sc. Fairbanks, Alaska May 2014 v Abstract The sculpin subfamily Oligocottinae is a group of 17 nearshore species and is noteworthy for the fact that it contains both intertidal and subtidal species, copulating and non- copulating species, and many species with very broad geographic ranges. These factors, as well as the consistency with which the constituent genera have been grouped together historically, make the Oligocottinae an ideal group for the study of the evolution of a reproductive mode known as internal gamete association (IGA), which is unique to sculpins. I conducted a phylogenetic study of the oligocottine sculpins based on an extensive molecular dataset consisting of DNA sequences from eight genomic regions. From the variability present in those sequences, I inferred phylogenetic relationships using parsimony, maximum likelihood, and Bayesian inference. Results of these phylogenetic analyses show that some historical taxonomy and classifications require revision to align taxonomy with evolutionary relatedness.
    [Show full text]
  • Evermann at the California Academy of Sciences Library
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt3b69r8jr No online items Inventory to the Papers of Barton Warren Evermann at the California Academy of Sciences Library Evermann (Barton Warren) Papers Finding aid prepared by Andrew Berger, Archives Intern California Academy of Sciences Archives 55 Music Concourse Drive Golden Gate Park San Francisco, CA, 94118 415-379-5484 [email protected] July 23, 2010 Note Inventory of box 130 online at N:\library\ARCHIVES\1 Archives Box List Bio on server at N:\library\ARCHIVES\1 Biography\Biography - Text MSS.156 1 Descriptive Summary Title: Evermann (Barton Warren) papers Collection number: MSS.156 Repository: California Academy of Sciences, Special Collections 55 Music Concourse Drive Golden Gate Park San Francisco, CA 94118 Languages: Materials are in English. Physical Description: 43.36 Cubic feet155 boxes, 4 half oversize folders Date: undated Language of materials: Materials are in English. Abstract: The Barton Warren Evermann papers are comprised of materials related to the life and work of educator, ichthyologist, and long-time director of the California Academy of Sciences, Barton Warren Evermann. Creator: Evermann, Barton Warren, 1853-1932 Preferred citation [Identification of item], Barton Warren Evermann Papers, California Academy of Sciences Library, San Francisco, CA. Immediate Source of Acquisition note Most of the material in the collection was donated to the California Academy of Sciences through the bequest of Barton Warren Evermann, following Evermann's death in 1932. Conditions governing access Access to the collection is unrestricted, with the exception of the nitrate negatives. Nitrate negatives have been separated from the collection. Negatives will be digitized and then frozen and may not be available for research.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Status of Coho Salmon in Streams of the Urbanized San Francisco Estuary, California
    CALIFORNIA FISH AND GAME California Fish and Game 91(4):219-254 2005 HISTORICAL STATUS OF COHO SALMON IN STREAMS OF THE URBANIZED SAN FRANCISCO ESTUARY, CALIFORNIA ROBERT A. LEIDY1 U. S. Environmental Protection Agency 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105 [email protected] and GORDON BECKER Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration 4179 Piedmont Avenue, Suite 325 Oakland, CA 94611 [email protected] and BRETT N. HARVEY Graduate Group in Ecology University of California Davis, CA 95616 1Corresponding author ABSTRACT The historical status of coho salmon, Oncorhynchus kisutch, was assessed in 65 watersheds surrounding the San Francisco Estuary, California. We reviewed published literature, unpublished reports, field notes, and specimens housed at museum and university collections and public agency files. In watersheds for which we found historical information for the occurrence of coho salmon, we developed a matrix of five environmental indicators to assess the probability that a stream supported habitat suitable for coho salmon. We found evidence that at least 4 of 65 Estuary watersheds (6%) historically supported coho salmon. A minimum of an additional 11 watersheds (17%) may also have supported coho salmon, but evidence is inconclusive. Coho salmon were last documented from an Estuary stream in the early-to-mid 1980s. Although broadly distributed, the environmental characteristics of streams known historically to contain coho salmon shared several characteristics. In the Estuary, coho salmon typically were members of three-to-six species assemblages of native fishes, including Pacific lamprey, Lampetra tridentata, steelhead, Oncorhynchus mykiss, California roach, Lavinia symmetricus, juvenile Sacramento sucker, Catostomus occidentalis, threespine stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus, riffle sculpin, Cottus gulosus, prickly sculpin, Cottus asper, and/or tidewater goby, Eucyclogobius newberryi.
    [Show full text]