Raising Pheasants R1803

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

R1803 Raising Pheasants Benjamin Geaumont Kevin Sedivec Aaron Field Wildlife and Range Extension Rangeland Range Research Scientist Management Specialist Graduate Assistant May 2016 1 • R1803 Raising Pheasants Table of Contents Preface ....................................................... 2 Pheasant History ........................................ 3 Checklist for Raising Pheasants ................. 4 Things to do Before Chicks Arrive ........... 4 Preface Care of Chicks Following Arrival ............. 5 Raising ring-necked pheasants (Phasianus To Hatch or to Buy ...................................... 5 colchicus) can be a rewarding experience Brood Rearing ............................................ 6 when done correctly and things go as planned. However, rearing pen-raised birds can go Feeding and Watering ................................ 7 afowl quickly with poor planning or Flight Pen.................................................... 8 should unforeseen circumstances arise. Cannibalism ................................................ 9 This guide to raising pheasants was developed by Irving Mork and C.R. Grondahl of the NDSU Disease ....................................................... 9 Extension Service (unknown date) and revised Regulations ................................................. 9 by Eric Bakke, also of the NDSU Extension How to Release Birds ............................... 10 Service (1984). We tried to keep the guide somewhat similar in content to its 1984 form, To Stock or Not to Stock ........................... 10 although readers familiar with the original Building Plans for a Flight Pen guide will notice additions and deletions. Suited for 50 Chicks.................................. 11 This guide is intended to provide those Design for Example 1 ............................ 11 interested in raising ring-necked pheasant with Equipment needed for Example 1 ......... 11 some general guidelines that, when followed, Design for Example 2 ............................ 12 should help improve the chances of being Citations .................................................... 12 successful. While this guide provides detail and guidance on raising pheasants, those actively raising or considering raising pheasants should take full advantage of all available resources concerning the subject. 2 • R1803 Raising Pheasants Pheasant History The ring-neck pheasant (Phasianus Several years of poor reproductive Another heavy winter kill in March colchicus) is not a game bird native success hastened the pheasant decline. 1966 further reduced pheasant to this continent. Birds from eastern Population declines were most severe densities in North Dakota. Pheasants China made up the first successful in the northern portions of the state, faced another tough winter in 1968-69, introduction in the Willamette Valley indicating that much of this area was which had record snowfalls. of Oregon in 1881. These birds rapidly marginally suitable as pheasant range. Populations continued to fluctuate increased in numbers, and the first During the 1950s, pheasant throughout the 1970s and into the hunting season was held in 1892. populations fluctuated from low 1980s, with the annual population Since that time, practically all states to moderate levels, compared with generally on a slight upward trend. have attempted to establish pheasants; numbers from the early 1940s. In 1985, the Conservation Reserve however, not all attempts have been Population ups and downs closely Program (CRP) was established by successful. Pheasants were stocked in followed annual reproductive success. the Food Security Act. As a result of North Dakota first in 1910 (Johnson CRP, an influx of grassland vegetation The best populations during the and Knue, 1989). The Game and Fish occurred across the state and peaked 1950s were in the southwestern Department, private organizations in the mid-2000s at approximately portion of the state, with southeastern and individuals continued periodic 3.3 million acres. Ring-necked populations marginal. Although stocking efforts for several years. pheasants responded positively pheasants were in most of the to the new habitat CRP provided By the early 1930s, pheasants were northern two-thirds of the state, and numbers began to grow, with established in the southeastern region numbers remained low. A partial pheasants occurring throughout of the state. This was partly due to reproductive failure in 1959 caused much of the state. birds dispersing from adjoining further declines in pheasant South Dakota counties. By 1932, populations. Beginning in the late 1990s, populations were high enough pheasant numbers greatly increased In 1960, spring breeding populations for the Game and Fish Department until the late 2000s, at which time were the lowest ever recorded, with to trap more than 15,000 birds in the population began to decline. the most severe decreases in the the southeast and release them in Pheasant numbers have continued western portion of the pheasant 44 other counties. to decline in recent years. Pheasant range. Populations fluctuated during populations had another reduction North Dakota’s first pheasant hunting the early 1960s. Another decline in in 2013 because early spring and fall season was held in 1931. Pheasants spring breeding populations in the blizzards negatively affected birds. met with nearly ideal habitat west in 1962 was followed by a conditions during the mid-1930s. steady recovery in 1964. Many factors affect pheasant Good reproduction and survival populations, the most important Pheasants in the southeast also resulted. Peak population levels of which is the need for adequate increased during this period. were reached by the mid-1940s. habitat. Since CRP enrollment peaked These increases were attributed to at approximately 3.3 million acres From the mid-1940s on, pheasant better cover in extensive Soil Bank in North Dakota, CRP acreage has populations declined. Cover acreages, generally improved moisture declined to 1.5 million acres, conditions deteriorated because of and milder winters. The winter of resulting in a significant loss of intensive land use during World 1964-65 caused heavy storm mortality habitat. Pheasant numbers no doubt War II. The decline was particularly throughout the entire range, and will continue to fluctuate; however, noticeable during the period of that spring, breeding populations we likely ever will see numbers as 1948 to 1950, when severe winter reached a new low. they were in the 1940s. mortality reduced pheasant numbers. 3 • R1803 Raising Pheasants Checklists for Raising Pheasants Things to do Before Chicks Arrive: Care of Chicks Following Arrival: n Remove all old litter if brooding house n Dip each chick’s beak in food and water and previously was used. place it under the brooder light or heat source. n Scrub the walls and floor with a good n Adjust the light as needed. disinfectant. Ensure all cracks are cleaned. • If chicks bunch under the light, it likely is too high. n When the house is dry, put down a good litter. • If chicks move away from light, it likely is too low. • Expanded vermiculite or mold-free straw n Leave the chick guard up for at least the first week makes good litter. and longer if the weather is bad. • Sand and shavings are not recommended. n Remove the litter paper or litter cloth at the end of • Chick starter paper can be placed over the fifth day. If the litter paper or cloth becomes soiled the litter for the first five days to prevent before the fifth day, turn it over and use the clean side. the chicks from eating the litter. Be sure the paper is not slick. n Inspect the chicks often during the first week, especially at night, to be sure they are comfortable n Clean and disinfect all feed and watering (neither too hot nor too cold). Be careful when you equipment. work around the chicks. Don’t scare them! n Check that your heat source works. n After the first week, reduce the temperature each • Be sure the heat source is well-secured week by raising the light 2 to 3 inches. Let the chicks to prevent potential fires. be your guide. n Adjust the heat lamp to fit the conditions n At the end of the third week, discontinue the heat when you put chicks in the brooder. during the day, weather permitting, and turn the heat on again at night. By the end of the fourth week, n Follow brooder directions closely. if the weather is nice, discontinuing the heat entirely n Have plenty of food on hand. should be possible. • Store food in a safe place in a rodent-proof n Allow some ventilation in the brooder house, but be sure container. no drafts are blowing directly on the young pheasants. • Pheasants require grit. Check with your n Keep feed and water available to the chicks at all times. feed dealer for details. n Chicks can be moved outside permanently when the use of the heat source is discontinued and nighttime lows stay well above freezing. • Chicks should have adequate shelter when moved outside to protect them from the elements. 4 • R1803 Raising Pheasants To Hatch or to Buy Buying day-old chicks or incubating Another method that can provide Journals should be used to keep pheasant eggs on your own has pros accurate measures of egg records of such things as the length of and cons. The incubation process development is the egg floating time the eggs have been stored, storage requires certain attention to details, method (Westerkov, 1950). As the chick temperature, date and time incubation including temperature and humidity. develops within the egg,
Recommended publications
  • Staphylococcus Aureus, a Gram-Positive Coccus Occurring in Clusters (Grapes Like)

    Staphylococcus Aureus, a Gram-Positive Coccus Occurring in Clusters (Grapes Like)

    STAPHYLOCOCCOSIS, STREPTOCOCCOSIS & CAMPYLOBACTERIOSIS DEFINITION Staphylococcosis is acute systemic or chronic disease of birds characterized most frequently by purulent arthritis and tenosynovitis. OCCURRENCE • Staphylococcal infections of poultry occur worldwide and affect all classes of birds. • Outbreaks are most important in turkeys and broilers. • The organisms are common in the environment and are especially associated with the skin (normal inhabitant). • Most diseases produced by Staphylococcus sp. are associated with ahistory of break in the skin or beak (trauma, beak trimming, toe trimming, foot pad burns etc.). OCCURRENCE • Avian infections tend to be caused by types occurring in birds rather than human strains. • Isolates pathogenic for one class of poultry are usually pathogenic for other classes of birds. • Toxigenic strains capable of causing food poisoning can contaminate the skin of processed poultry (zoonotic importance). • The source of these strains at present is in debate. • Bio-typing indicates processing plant worker origin while plasmid profile indicates poultry origin. HISTORICAL INFORMATION • Staphylococci were first discovered to be a cause of arthritis in geese in 1892. • Since that time they have been identified as the cause of a variety of localized and systemic diseases in many different avian species and in most areas of the world. • The disease was more common in turkeys when they were raised on range than it is now. ETIOLOGY • 1. Most staphylococci isolates have been identified as Staphylococcus aureus, a Gram-positive coccus occurring in clusters (grapes like). Pathogenic isolates are usually coagulase positive. 2. Organisms are moderately resistant to common disinfectants. • Chlorine-containing disinfectants are efficacious in the absence of organic material.
  • The Effect of Degree of Debeaking and Cage Population Size on Selected Production Characteristics Of

    The Effect of Degree of Debeaking and Cage Population Size on Selected Production Characteristics Of

    110 626 THE EFFECT OF DEGREE OF DEBEAKING AND CAGE POPULATION SIZE ON SELECTED PRODUCTION CHARACTERISTICS OF CAGED LAYERS Thesis for the Degree of M. S. MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY Robert Carey Hargreaves 'I 965 THESIS LIBRARY Michigan State University ABSTRACT THE EFFECT OF DEGREE 0F DEBEAKING.AND CAGE POPULATION SIZE ON SELECTED PRODUCTION CHARACTERISTICS OF CAGED LAYERS by Robert Carey Hargreaves Debeaking is commercially used as one method of preventing canni- balism in young growing chickens, laying hens, turkeys, and game birds. In recent years, the relative severity of debeaking has increased. The primary purpose of this experiment was to determine the effects that severe degrees of debeaking might have on production characteristics of caged laying chickens. Single Comb'White Leghorn pullets were debeaked at 18 weeks of age and placed in l-bird and 3-bird cages. Other birds from the same stock were debeaked at 24 and 25 weeks of age and placed in 2-bird cages and 21-bird cages. Three degrees of debeaking were used -- 1/2, 3/& and all of the distance between the tip of the beak and the nostrils. Ap- proximately the same amount of both upper and lower mandibles was re- moved. Non-debeaked birds served as the controls. The birds with all of the beak removed are referred to as "entirely debeaked”. Compared with birds in any of the other three treatments, entirely debeaked birds gave poorer results. They took longer coming into egg production, laid fewer eggs, ate less feed and made smaller body weight gains. All of these differences were highly significant.
  • Journal of Animal & Natural Resource

    Journal of Animal & Natural Resource

    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL & NATURAL RESOURCE LAW Michigan State University College of Law MAY 2019 VOLUME XV The Journal of Animal & Natural Resource Law is published annually by law students at Michigan State University College of Law. The Journal of Animal & Natural Resource Law received generous support from the Animal Legal Defense Fund and the Michigan State University College of Law. Without their generous support, the Journal would not have been able to publish and host its annual symposium. The Journal also is funded by subscription revenues. Subscription requests and article submissions may be sent to: Professor David Favre, Journal of Animal & Natural Resource Law, Michigan State University College of Law, 368 Law College Building, East Lansing MI 48824, or by email to msujanrl@ gmail.com. Current yearly subscription rates are $27.00 in the U.S. and current yearly Internet subscription rates are $27.00. Subscriptions are renewed automatically unless a request for discontinuance is received. Back issues may be obtained from: William S. Hein & Co., Inc., 1285 Main Street, Buffalo, NY 14209. The Journal of Animal & Natural Resource Law welcomes the submission of articles, book reviews, and notes & comments. Each manuscript must be double spaced, in 12 point, Times New Roman; footnotes must be single spaced, 10 point, Times New Roman. Submissions should be sent to [email protected] using Microsoft Word or PDF format. Submissions should conform closely to the 19th edition of The Bluebook: A Uniform System of Citation. All articles contain a 2019 author copyright unless otherwise noted at beginning of article. Copyright © 2019 by the Journal of Animal & Natural Resource Law, Michigan State University College of Law.
  • UPC Fall-Winter 2009 Poultry Press

    UPC Fall-Winter 2009 Poultry Press

    Fall-Winter 2009 Volume 19, Number 3 PoultryPromoting the compassionate and respectful Press treatment of domestic fowl Chosen one of the BEST Nonprofit Publications by UTNE magazine UPC# 11656 United Poultry Concerns P.O. Box 150 Machipongo, VA 23405-0150 (757) 678-7875 FAX: (757) 678-5070 Visit Our Web Site: www.upc-online.org Photo © Davida G. Breier & www.NoVoiceUnheard.org UPC sanctuary turkey, Amelia, sits quietly in her favorite nesting place. UNITED PO U LTRY CON C ERNS WWW .upc -ONLINE .ORG Volume 19, Number 3 Ritual Sacrif ice: “The reduction of living beings to objects upon whom atrocities can be heaped.” -Maxwell Schnurer, “At the Gates of Hell,” Terrorists or Freedom Fighters? By Karen Davis, PhD, President of United A bum conceit, but how much different is it from Poultry Concerns advertisements claiming that chickens want to be selected as the tastiest sandwich or that pigs are dying he idea that some groups were put on the to become an Oscar Mayer wiener? Animals who are earth to suffer and die sacrificially for a otherwise maledicted as “dirty” and “stupid” acquire Tsuperior group goes far back in time. The their value in being slaughtered for the “higher” species. idea is deeply embedded in human cultures, including They are decontaminated by being cooked and elevated the culture of the West, which is rooted in ancient by being absorbed into the body of a human being. Greek and Hebrew modes of thought, and incorporated Surely they must relish their privilege. in Christianity, where these roots combine. Animal sacrifice is not just an anachronism in these “.
  • Cannibalism in Poultry Causes

    cures 0 Anti-pick pastes. These can be used Hen specks or blinders. These can to curb cannibalism if just a few be applied for the prevention of birds are affected. A bitter tasting, cannibalism in laying hens. They are ummm blood-coJored preparation or pine attached to the nostrils and prevent tar daubed on the picked portion is » the birds from seeing straight ahead effective. There are several com- but apparently do not affect eating mercial preparations for this pur- or drinking. Specks should be ap- pose. If many birds are picked one plied to pullets before they start to In Poultry of the following methods should be lay. Several types are available and used. appear equally effective. Debeaklng. This is the most prac- Pick-guards. This device, as the tical method to use with broilers. speck, is attached to the nostril and Debeaking is accomplished by extends over the end of the beak. cutting off the upper beak from It prevents the hen from picking Vz to '/a the distance between forward, but does not hinder her the tip and the nostrils. If less eating. Neither specks or pick- than Vi of the beak is cut off it guards are commonly used on will grow back within a few turkeys. months. If Va or more of the upper beak is cut off it will not grow 'back, but the lower beak usually grows longer. This makes i it difficult for the birds to eat scratch from the litter or to drink from shallow waterers. In this Turkey-bits.
  • Chicken's Digestive System

    Chicken's Digestive System

    Poultry Leader Guide EM082E Level 2 4-H Poultry Leader Notebook Level II Identifying Poultry Feed Ingredients ........................................................3 How to Read Feed Tags ............................................................................7 Boney Birds ............................................................................................ 11 Chicken’s Digestive System ...................................................................17 Poultry Disease Prevention .....................................................................25 Poultry Parasites and Diseases ...............................................................27 Cracking Up—What’s in an Egg? ..........................................................31 Making and Using an Egg Candler ........................................................35 Constructing a Small Incubator ..............................................................39 Determining the Sex of Poultry ..............................................................45 Maternal Bonding and Imprinting (Follow the Leader) .........................49 Preventing Cannibalism ..........................................................................51 The Peck Order .......................................................................................55 Economics of Broiler Production ............................................................59 Poultry Furniture .....................................................................................65 Types of Poultry Housing .......................................................................69
  • NATURAL BEAK SMOOTHING Smoothing, Saving, Performing

    NATURAL BEAK SMOOTHING Smoothing, Saving, Performing

    NATURAL BEAK SMOOTHING Smoothing, saving, performing FOR BROILERS BREEDERS FEEDING Developed in cooperation with the major breeding companies NATURAL BEAK SMOOTHING, A SUSTAINABLE SOLUTION FOR POULTRY FARMERS “ GERMANY Markus Böckermann looked for a sustainable solution because of the ban of beak trimming in Germany. “The results of the test phase were impressive. After 11 weeks, there was no longer any difference in shape between the infrared trimmed beaks and the beaks subjected to Natural Beak Smoothing.“ “ INDIA Life Line Feeds is a pioneer in the Indian poultry market. So the company was eager to test the Natural Beak Smoothing solution as an alternative to mechanical hot blade debeaking. The solution fits perfectly with the philosophy of Life Line Feeds’ Managing Director: for Mr. Kishore Kumar, animal welfare is a top priority. According to him, Natural Beak Smoothing has proven to drastically reduce stress and risk of infections in his broiler breeder houses. “ BELGIUM Dirk Mertens finds it important to invest in systems that improve animal welfare. “I notice there is less mortality among our chicks, because they don’t suffer a relapse. They have less stress and can just continue eating during the first days. We also notice a greater uniformity among the chicks. All these things eventually lead to a better end result.” BEAK TREATMENT » SOLUTIONS TODAY WHY BEAK TREATMENT = A PREVENTIVE MEASURE EFFECT OF BEAK TREATMENT: / to have optimal performance of flock laborious and time consuming Infrared beak trimming in hatchery 01 / to
  • UPC Winter/Spring 1998 Poultry Press

    UPC Winter/Spring 1998 Poultry Press

    Please Hold a Vigil for Chickens This Spring UNITED POULTRY CONCERNS WILL PROVIDE LITERATURE Please volunteer to coordinate a Release to all local media is faxed, mailed, Spring Vigil for Chickens in your neighbor­ or e-mailed a week prior to the event and hood this April or May. UPC will provide should be followed up with phone calls a you with handout literature, a sample day or two ahead. News Release, Public Service Shape your announcements to suit Announcement (PSA) and Ca1Rndar of your own Vigil and contact UPC with any Events Announcement. Calendar and PSA questions you have. UPC thanks you for announcements inform the public of the helping to make a better life for chickens in event and invite them to participate. 1998. Calendar Announcements are sent to local newspapers and PSA's to local TV and radio stations 2 to 3 weeks in advance. A News Sample Banner & Poster Slogans Stick Up For Chickens! Sick Chickens Cooped in Poop Bacterial Streams of Fecal Soup Misery Is Not a Health Food Don't Just Switch from Beef to Chicken Get the Slaughterhouse Illustration by Nigel Burroughs Out of Your Kitchen Starving Hens Has Got to Stop What You Can Do: Ban Forced Molting of Laying Hens The Cruelty & Contamination Are DSeta date Linked D Invite Participants Forced Molting Causes Salmonella D Enlarge Graphic Photos at Copy Center Debeaking Causes Pain D Hold a Poster-Making Party Respect Chickens - Don't Eat Them D Contact Local News Media MlllEUJIDD1i]I lttp=A11il~li!l~i!i1!!!![1[1111•1WB"·""· .
  • Poultry Industry Manual

    Poultry Industry Manual

    POULTRY INDUSTRY MANUAL FAD PReP Foreign Animal Disease Preparedness & Response Plan National Animal Health Emergency Management System United States Department of Agriculture • Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service • Veterinary Services MARCH 2013 Poultry Industry Manual The Foreign Animal Disease Preparedness and Response Plan (FAD PReP)/National Animal Health Emergency Management System (NAHEMS) Guidelines provide a framework for use in dealing with an animal health emergency in the United States. This FAD PReP Industry Manual was produced by the Center for Food Security and Public Health, Iowa State University of Science and Technology, College of Veterinary Medicine, in collaboration with the U.S. Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service through a cooperative agreement. The FAD PReP Poultry Industry Manual was last updated in March 2013. Please send questions or comments to: Center for Food Security and Public Health National Center for Animal Health 2160 Veterinary Medicine Emergency Management Iowa State University of Science and Technology US Department of Agriculture (USDA) Ames, IA 50011 Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Telephone: 515-294-1492 U.S. Department of Agriculture Fax: 515-294-8259 4700 River Road, Unit 41 Email: [email protected] Riverdale, Maryland 20737-1231 subject line FAD PReP Poultry Industry Manual Telephone: (301) 851-3595 Fax: (301) 734-7817 E-mail: [email protected] While best efforts have been used in developing and preparing the FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines, the US Government, US Department of Agriculture and the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service and other parties, such as employees and contractors contributing to this document, neither warrant nor assume any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information or procedure disclosed.
  • Beak Trimming Methods -Review

    Beak Trimming Methods -Review

    1619 Beak Trimming Methods -Review - P. C. Glatz* Pig and Poultry Production Institute, South Australian Research and Development Institute Roseworthy, South Australia, 5371, Australia ABSTRACT : A review was undertaken to obtain information on the range of beak-trimming methods available or under development. Beak-trimming of commercial layer replacement pullets is a common yet critical management tool that can affect the performance for the life of the flock. The most obvious advantage of beak-trimming is a reduction in cannibalism although the extent of the reduction in cannibalism depends on the strain, season, and type of housing, flock health and other factors. Beak-trimming also improves feed conversion by reducing food wastage. A further advantage of beak-trimming is a reduction in the chronic stress associated with dominance interactions in the flock. Beak-trimming of birds at 7-10 days is favoured by Industry but research over last 10 years has shown that beak-trimming at day-old causes the least stress on birds and efforts are needed to encourage Industry to adopt the practice of beak-trimming birds at day-old. Proper beak-trimming can result in greatly improved layer performance but improper beak-trimming can ruin an other wise good flock of hens. Re-trimming is practiced in most flocks, although there are some flocks that only need one trimming. Given the continuing welfare scrutiny of using a hot blade to cut the beak, attempts have been made to develop more welfare friendly methods of beak-trimming. Despite the developments in design of hot blade beak-trimmers the process has remained largely unchanged.
  • Campylobacter in a Turkey Production Facility

    Campylobacter in a Turkey Production Facility

    Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2001 Prevalence of Campylobacter in a turkey production facility Aaron Shawn Kiess West Virginia University Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Recommended Citation Kiess, Aaron Shawn, "Prevalence of Campylobacter in a turkey production facility" (2001). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 1314. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/1314 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by the The Research Repository @ WVU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you must obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in WVU Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports collection by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Prevalence of Campylobacter in a Turkey Production Facility Aaron S. Kiess Thesis submitted to the Davis College of Agriculture, Forestry, and Consumer Sciences At West Virginia University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Animal and Veterinary Sciences P. Brett Kenney, Ph.D., Chair Gary K. Bissonnette, Ph.D. Ronald A. Peterson, Ph.D. Division of Animal and Veterinary Sciences Morgantown, West Virginia 2001 Keywords: turkeys, colonization rate, Campylobacter, campylobacteriosis, preharvest ABSTRACT Prevalence of Campylobacter in a Turkey Production Facility Aaron Shawn Kiess Frequency of detection was monitored in three flocks of turkeys from May, 2000 to March 2001.
  • Table of Contents

    Table of Contents

    1 Table of Contents 2 Letter Words .................................................................................................................................2 3 Letter Words .................................................................................................................................3 4 Letter Words .................................................................................................................................5 5 Letter Words ...............................................................................................................................12 6 Letter Words ...............................................................................................................................25 7 Letter Words ...............................................................................................................................43 8 Letter Words ...............................................................................................................................60 All words are taken from OWL 22 HOW TO USE THIS DOCUMENT Have you ever wanted to maximize your studying time? Just buzzing through word lists do not ensure that you will ever play the word….ever. The word lists in this document were run through 917,607 full game simulations. Only words that were played at least 100 times are in this list and in the order of most frequently played. These lists are in order or probability to play with the first word being the most probable. To maximize the use of this list is easy. Simply