© in This Web Service Cambridge University

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

© in This Web Service Cambridge University Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-00840-3 - Foundations of Quantum Gravity James Lindesay Index More information Index abelian, 374 basis vectors, 48, 207 abelian group, 357 beginning of time, 313 abelian subgroup, 353 Belinfante tensor, 131, 256 absolute motion, 222 Bell’s inequality, 67 absolute space, 222 Bianchi identities, 218 accelerating observer, 229 Big Bang cosmology, 309 accelerating oscillator, 40 Birkhoff’s theorem, 89, 270 quantum, 365 black body, 310, 320 acceleration, 24, 205 black body radiation, 126 thermal properties, 96 black hole, 261, 267, 295 acoustic wave, 310 charged, 349 primordial, 332 dynamic, 281 action, 128 extremal, 350 Euclidean, 387 non-singular, 271 gravitational, 225 Schwarzschild, 270, 274 action principle, 210, 223 spatially coherent, 282 active transformations, 14 temporally transient, 294 adiabatic expansion, 320 threshold mass, 261 adjoint representation, 158, 359 black object, 268, 295 affine connections, see connections,36 temporally transient, 294 affine mass, see transverse mass, 172 blue shift, 209 affine parameter, 215 Bohr gravitating system, 90 affine space, 207 Boltzmann’s entropy, 77 affine translations, 176 Bose–Einstein condensate, 145 algebra, 133 bosons, 69 analyticity, 28 bound state wavefunction, 106 anelastic scattering, 120 bound states, 104, 108 angular momentum, 130, 132 boundary conditions, 223 canonical, 132 boundary states, 104 Kerr geometry, 241 bra, 48 angular momentum conservation, 132 breakup, 116 annihilation operator, 59 anti-commutator, 51, 55 calculating curvature, 384 arbitrariness of coordinate systems, calculus of variations, 128 206 canonical ensemble, 78, 276 area theorem canonical momentum, 41 violation, 248 canonical proper-energy, 37 artificial gravity, 34 canonical proper-time, 36 associativity, 51, 357 Casimir effect, 60 Asymptopia, 240 Casimir operator, 360 average, 54 Cauchy principal value, 115 397 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-00840-3 - Foundations of Quantum Gravity James Lindesay Index More information 398 Index causal horizon, 31 complementary set, 159 causal patch, 26 completeness, 48 causal propagator, 113 Compton scattering, 120 causal resolvant, 123 cosmological, 332 causal spinor field, 185, 198 condensed-matter fields, 72 causality, 43, 184, 226, 278 confinement, 104, 117 centrifugal barrier, 251 conformal coordinates, 28, 42 chain rule, 206, 207, 209, 383 de Sitter space, 315 Chandrasekhar limit, 310 spatially coherent black hole, 282 channel decomposition, 106 conformal diagrams, 42 charge, 18 dynamic de Sitter, 327 conservation, 346 stellar, 233 generalized, 134 conformal mass, see transverse mass, 379 charge conjugation, 178, 195 conformal time, 332 spinor fields, 197, 200 conical angle, 277 charge conservation, 130 conical excess, 387 charge current density connections, 36, 209, 211, 212, 257, 383 with gravity, 347 trace, 213 charge quantization, 22 conservation equations, 129 charged geometry, 345 of angular momentum, 220 chiral projections, 380 of charge, 18 chirality, 171 with gravity, 346 Christoffel symbols, 36 of energy, 220 classical correspondence, 56, 101, 119 of energy-momentum, 129 classical disentanglement, 122 of probability, 101 classical gravitation, 40 of velocity, 110 classical-quantum correspondence, 56 properties, 101 cloning, 83 conservative forces, 218 closed forms, 383 contact form of relativistic dynamics, 111 closed universe, 311 continuity equation, 18, 129 closure, 51, 133, 357 current density, 130 cluster decomposability, 101, 110, 111, 252, 287 fluid, 232 cluster decomposition, 65, 120 photons, 332 clusters, 104 continuum states, 105 CMB radiation (cosmic microwave background contravariant vector, 13, 207 radiation), 267, 310 convergence of QED, 103 fluctuations, 332 Cooper pair, 102 co-gravitating masses, 263 coordinate basis, 207 co-gravitating quanta, 288 coordinate geometry, 216 co-gravitation, 88, 92, 246, 287, 332 coordinate singularity, 237 Klein–Gordon fields, 287 coordinates not vectors, 210 co-moving, 230 core gravitating field, 291 co-moving observers, 312, 318, 329 correlation functions, 73 coalescence, 116 photons, 127 coarse-grained measurements, 79 correlations, 60, 72, 73 coherence, 54, 81, 245 correspondence, 38, 110, 112, 117, 182, 213, 220, coherence functions 228, 241, 339 photon, 127 correspondence problem, 104 coherence rule, 246 cosmic microwave background radiation, see CMB collapse radiation pressureless, 296 cosmological collapse of the wave function, 54 constant, 221, 311, 313 color, 135 densities, 311 commutator, 51, 55 features, 311 commuting operators, 51 parameters, 337 compact, 361 principle, 309, 317 compact coordinates, 44 cosmology, 309 complementarity, 269, 278, 307 counting of bound states, 369 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-00840-3 - Foundations of Quantum Gravity James Lindesay Index More information Index 399 covariance, 246, 267 Einstein summation convention, 12 covariant derivative, 212 Einstein tensor covariant divergence, 213 spatially coherent black hole, 282 covariant vectors, 207 Einstein’s equations, 220 covering group, 357, 362, 363 quantum, 246 CP transformation, 200 self-generating mass, 261 Cramer’s rule, 255 Einstein’s relation, 326 creation operator, 59 elastic scattering, 117 cross section, 115 electrodynamics, 18 crossing, 124 electromagnetic CTP theorem, 201 energy density, 21 CTP transformation, 200, 201 energy-momentum, 21 current density, 21, 130 field tensor, 20 curvature, 216 momentum density, 22 calculation, 384 radiation field, 70 curvature two-forms, 384 electromagnetism, 137 curved space-time backgrounds, 245 on curved space-times, 346 curvilinear coordinates, 206, 211 emergence of space-time, 246 empty space, 220 dark energy, 309, 311, 340 energy, 15 dark energy domination, 328 energy conditions, 95, 226, 248 dark energy partitions, 335 fluids, 236 dark matter, 310 self-gravitating masses, 263 de Sitter space, 314 energy conservation, 220 decoupling, 323 energy density, 220 degree of mapping, 145, 148 energy flux, 220 density matrix, 74, 278, 289, 339 energy-momentum conservation, 221, 231 Rindler, 279 energy-momentum tensor, 132, 136, 221 Schwarzschild, 280 core gravitating field, 292 density of states, 61, 276, 337 electromagnetic, 345 density perturbations fluid, 231 primordial, 333 gauge fields, 136 determinant and trace, 213 gravitation, 225 diagonal coordinates, 230 gravitational, 255 diffusion constant, 325 linear spinor fields, 255 dimensional analysis, 290, 293 symmetric, 131 dimensions, units, 206 entanglement, 65, 74, 80, 82, 110 Dirac sea, 168, 189 black object geometry, 306 disconnected diagrams, 106 entanglement entropy, 81 discrete symmetries, 173 entropy, 275 disentangled states, 120 black holes, 277, 387 disentanglement, 252, 287 cosmological, 340, 341 disorder, 79 horizon, 340 dispersion relation, 189 statistical, 78 dissipation, 389 thermal, 77 distant correlations, 67 von Neumann, 77 divergences, 247 entropy bounds, 280 dominant energy condition, 226 entropy per baryon, 312 dual of a spinor, 151 Eotvos experiment, 205 dust equation of state, 320 equatorial motions, Kerr geometry, 242 dynamic de Sitter cosmology, 316, 317 equivalence principle, 199, 205, 209, 214, 225, 246 dynamic geometries, 345 equivalent vector representation, 373 eternal triangle, 108 effective range, 108 Euclidean metric, 276 Efimov effect, 102, 108, 371 Euler equation, 332 eigenstate, 50, 53 Euler–Lagrange equations, 129 eigenvalue, 50 gauge fields, 136 Einstein field equations, 221, 339, 340 local, 136 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-00840-3 - Foundations of Quantum Gravity James Lindesay Index More information 400 Index evaporation, 274 future light cone, 43 black object, 297, 307 future light-like infinity, 45 event horizon, see horizon, 270 exact forms, 383 Galilean group, 139, 140 exotic motions, 239 Galilean pre-symmetry, 142 expansion rate Gamma boosts, 379 initial, 335 gauge covariant derivative, 134, 144 expectation value, 50, 55, 74 gauge current non-conservation, 136 extended Poincare´ group, 254 gauge currents, 136, 138 exterior derivative, 383 gauge invariance, 135 extracting poles, 106 gauge potentials, 134 extremal black hole, 350 transformation, 134 gauge transformations, 133, 142 Faddeev channels, 111 general relativity, 205 Faddeev formulation of scattering theory, 106 general relativity as a local theory, 330 Fermi degeneracy pressure, 310 generators, 51, 129, 133, 207, 218 fermions, 69 generators for infinitesimal transformations, 51, 358, few particle scattering theory, 110 360 fiducial observers, 38, 209, 229, 271 geodesic equation, 36, 209, 214, 257 charged geometry, 350 geodesic motion field strengths, 134 cosmological, 324 fine-grained measurements, 79 spatially coherent black hole, 284 first law of thermodynamics, 77, 275, 341 geodesics, 205, 208, 210, 257 Big Bang, 320 geometric conservation, 221 black holes, 277 geometric consistency, 300 dynamic de Sitter, 321 cosmology, 334 fluctuations, 332, 389 geometric kinematic invariants, 218 CMB, 310 geometric time, 339 zero-point, 336 geometrically stationary observers, 230, 259, 313 fluid cosmology, 316 dynamic de Sitter, 317, 329 fluid densities, 231 Robertson–Walker, 318 fluid dynamics spatially coherent black hole, 285 cosmology, 318 transient black object, 304 fluid, ideal, 231 geometrodynamics, 220 force density, 137 global positioning satellites, 227 four-current density, 21 global
Recommended publications
  • The State of the Multiverse: the String Landscape, the Cosmological Constant, and the Arrow of Time
    The State of the Multiverse: The String Landscape, the Cosmological Constant, and the Arrow of Time Raphael Bousso Center for Theoretical Physics University of California, Berkeley Stephen Hawking: 70th Birthday Conference Cambridge, 6 January 2011 RB & Polchinski, hep-th/0004134; RB, arXiv:1112.3341 The Cosmological Constant Problem The Landscape of String Theory Cosmology: Eternal inflation and the Multiverse The Observed Arrow of Time The Arrow of Time in Monovacuous Theories A Landscape with Two Vacua A Landscape with Four Vacua The String Landscape Magnitude of contributions to the vacuum energy graviton (a) (b) I Vacuum fluctuations: SUSY cutoff: ! 10−64; Planck scale cutoff: ! 1 I Effective potentials for scalars: Electroweak symmetry breaking lowers Λ by approximately (200 GeV)4 ≈ 10−67. The cosmological constant problem −121 I Each known contribution is much larger than 10 (the observational upper bound on jΛj known for decades) I Different contributions can cancel against each other or against ΛEinstein. I But why would they do so to a precision better than 10−121? Why is the vacuum energy so small? 6= 0 Why is the energy of the vacuum so small, and why is it comparable to the matter density in the present era? Recent observations Supernovae/CMB/ Large Scale Structure: Λ ≈ 0:4 × 10−121 Recent observations Supernovae/CMB/ Large Scale Structure: Λ ≈ 0:4 × 10−121 6= 0 Why is the energy of the vacuum so small, and why is it comparable to the matter density in the present era? The Cosmological Constant Problem The Landscape of String Theory Cosmology: Eternal inflation and the Multiverse The Observed Arrow of Time The Arrow of Time in Monovacuous Theories A Landscape with Two Vacua A Landscape with Four Vacua The String Landscape Many ways to make empty space Topology and combinatorics RB & Polchinski (2000) I A six-dimensional manifold contains hundreds of topological cycles.
    [Show full text]
  • On Asymptotically De Sitter Space: Entropy & Moduli Dynamics
    On Asymptotically de Sitter Space: Entropy & Moduli Dynamics To Appear... [1206.nnnn] Mahdi Torabian International Centre for Theoretical Physics, Trieste String Phenomenology Workshop 2012 Isaac Newton Institute , CAMBRIDGE 1 Tuesday, June 26, 12 WMAP 7-year Cosmological Interpretation 3 TABLE 1 The state of Summarythe ofart the cosmological of Observational parameters of ΛCDM modela Cosmology b c Class Parameter WMAP 7-year ML WMAP+BAO+H0 ML WMAP 7-year Mean WMAP+BAO+H0 Mean 2 +0.056 Primary 100Ωbh 2.227 2.253 2.249−0.057 2.255 ± 0.054 2 Ωch 0.1116 0.1122 0.1120 ± 0.0056 0.1126 ± 0.0036 +0.030 ΩΛ 0.729 0.728 0.727−0.029 0.725 ± 0.016 ns 0.966 0.967 0.967 ± 0.014 0.968 ± 0.012 τ 0.085 0.085 0.088 ± 0.015 0.088 ± 0.014 2 d −9 −9 −9 −9 ∆R(k0) 2.42 × 10 2.42 × 10 (2.43 ± 0.11) × 10 (2.430 ± 0.091) × 10 +0.030 Derived σ8 0.809 0.810 0.811−0.031 0.816 ± 0.024 H0 70.3km/s/Mpc 70.4km/s/Mpc 70.4 ± 2.5km/s/Mpc 70.2 ± 1.4km/s/Mpc Ωb 0.0451 0.0455 0.0455 ± 0.0028 0.0458 ± 0.0016 Ωc 0.226 0.226 0.228 ± 0.027 0.229 ± 0.015 2 +0.0056 Ωmh 0.1338 0.1347 0.1345−0.0055 0.1352 ± 0.0036 e zreion 10.4 10.3 10.6 ± 1.210.6 ± 1.2 f t0 13.79 Gyr 13.76 Gyr 13.77 ± 0.13 Gyr 13.76 ± 0.11 Gyr a The parameters listed here are derived using the RECFAST 1.5 and version 4.1 of the WMAP[WMAP-7likelihood 1001.4538] code.
    [Show full text]
  • University of California Santa Cruz Quantum
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ QUANTUM GRAVITY AND COSMOLOGY A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in PHYSICS by Lorenzo Mannelli September 2005 The Dissertation of Lorenzo Mannelli is approved: Professor Tom Banks, Chair Professor Michael Dine Professor Anthony Aguirre Lisa C. Sloan Vice Provost and Dean of Graduate Studies °c 2005 Lorenzo Mannelli Contents List of Figures vi Abstract vii Dedication viii Acknowledgments ix I The Holographic Principle 1 1 Introduction 2 2 Entropy Bounds for Black Holes 6 2.1 Black Holes Thermodynamics ........................ 6 2.1.1 Area Theorem ............................ 7 2.1.2 No-hair Theorem ........................... 7 2.2 Bekenstein Entropy and the Generalized Second Law ........... 8 2.2.1 Hawking Radiation .......................... 10 2.2.2 Bekenstein Bound: Geroch Process . 12 2.2.3 Spherical Entropy Bound: Susskind Process . 12 2.2.4 Relation to the Bekenstein Bound . 13 3 Degrees of Freedom and Entropy 15 3.1 Degrees of Freedom .............................. 15 3.1.1 Fundamental System ......................... 16 3.2 Complexity According to Local Field Theory . 16 3.3 Complexity According to the Spherical Entropy Bound . 18 3.4 Why Local Field Theory Gives the Wrong Answer . 19 4 The Covariant Entropy Bound 20 4.1 Light-Sheets .................................. 20 iii 4.1.1 The Raychaudhuri Equation .................... 20 4.1.2 Orthogonal Null Hypersurfaces ................... 24 4.1.3 Light-sheet Selection ......................... 26 4.1.4 Light-sheet Termination ....................... 28 4.2 Entropy on a Light-Sheet .......................... 29 4.3 Formulation of the Covariant Entropy Bound . 30 5 Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetime 32 5.1 Scalar Field Quantization .........................
    [Show full text]
  • On the Limits of Effective Quantum Field Theory
    RUNHETC-2019-15 On the Limits of Effective Quantum Field Theory: Eternal Inflation, Landscapes, and Other Mythical Beasts Tom Banks Department of Physics and NHETC Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854 E-mail: [email protected] Abstract We recapitulate multiple arguments that Eternal Inflation and the String Landscape are actually part of the Swampland: ideas in Effective Quantum Field Theory that do not have a counterpart in genuine models of Quantum Gravity. 1 Introduction Most of the arguments and results in this paper are old, dating back a decade, and very little of what is written here has not been published previously, or presented in talks. I was motivated to write this note after spending two weeks at the Vacuum Energy and Electroweak Scale workshop at KITP in Santa Barbara. There I found a whole new generation of effective field theorists recycling tired ideas from the 1980s about the use of effective field theory in gravitational contexts. These were ideas that I once believed in, but since the beginning of the 21st century my work in string theory and the dynamics of black holes, convinced me that they arXiv:1910.12817v2 [hep-th] 6 Nov 2019 were wrong. I wrote and lectured about this extensively in the first decade of the century, but apparently those arguments have not been accepted, and effective field theorists have concluded that the main lesson from string theory is that there is a vast landscape of meta-stable states in the theory of quantum gravity, connected by tunneling transitions in the manner envisioned by effective field theorists in the 1980s.
    [Show full text]
  • Geometric Origin of Coincidences and Hierarchies in the Landscape
    Geometric origin of coincidences and hierarchies in the landscape The MIT Faculty has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Citation Bousso, Raphael et al. “Geometric origin of coincidences and hierarchies in the landscape.” Physical Review D 84.8 (2011): n. pag. Web. 26 Jan. 2012. © 2011 American Physical Society As Published http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.84.083517 Publisher American Physical Society (APS) Version Final published version Citable link http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/68666 Terms of Use Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use. PHYSICAL REVIEW D 84, 083517 (2011) Geometric origin of coincidences and hierarchies in the landscape Raphael Bousso,1,2 Ben Freivogel,3 Stefan Leichenauer,1,2 and Vladimir Rosenhaus1,2 1Center for Theoretical Physics and Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720-7300, USA 2Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720-8162, USA 3Center for Theoretical Physics and Laboratory for Nuclear Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA (Received 2 August 2011; published 14 October 2011) We show that the geometry of cutoffs on eternal inflation strongly constrains predictions for the time scales of vacuum domination, curvature domination, and observation. We consider three measure proposals: the causal patch, the fat geodesic, and the apparent horizon cutoff, which is introduced here for the first time. We impose neither anthropic requirements nor restrictions on landscape vacua. For vacua with positive cosmological constant, all three measures predict the double coincidence that most observers live at the onset of vacuum domination and just before the onset of curvature domination.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:Hep-Th/0209231 V1 26 Sep 2002 Tbs,Daai N Uigi Eurdfrsae Te Hntetemlvcu Olead to Vacuum Thermal the Anisotropy
    SLAC-PUB-9533 BRX TH-505 October 2002 SU-ITP-02/02 Initial conditions for inflation Nemanja Kaloper1;2, Matthew Kleban1, Albion Lawrence1;3;4, Stephen Shenker1 and Leonard Susskind1 1Department of Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305 2Department of Physics, University of California, Davis, CA 95616 3Brandeis University Physics Department, MS 057, POB 549110, Waltham, MA 02454y 4SLAC Theory Group, MS 81, 2575 Sand Hill Road, Menlo Park, CA 94025 Free scalar fields in de Sitter space have a one-parameter family of states invariant under the de Sitter group, including the standard thermal vacuum. We show that, except for the thermal vacuum, these states are unphysical when gravitational interactions are arXiv:hep-th/0209231 v1 26 Sep 2002 included. We apply these observations to the quantum state of the inflaton, and find that at best, dramatic fine tuning is required for states other than the thermal vacuum to lead to observable features in the CMBR anisotropy. y Present and permanent address. *Work supported in part by Department of Energy Contract DE-AC03-76SF00515. 1. Introduction In inflationary cosmology, cosmic microwave background (CMB) data place a tanta- lizing upper bound on the vacuum energy density during the inflationary epoch: 4 V M 4 1016 GeV : (1:1) ∼ GUT ∼ Here MGUT is the \unification scale" in supersymmetric grand unified models, as predicted by the running of the observed strong, weak and electromagnetic couplings above 1 T eV in the minimal supersymmetric standard model. If this upper bound is close to the truth, the vacuum energy can be measured directly with detectors sensitive to the polarization of the CMBR.
    [Show full text]
  • Geometric Approaches to Quantum Field Theory
    GEOMETRIC APPROACHES TO QUANTUM FIELD THEORY A thesis submitted to The University of Manchester for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Science and Engineering 2020 Kieran T. O. Finn School of Physics and Astronomy Supervised by Professor Apostolos Pilaftsis BLANK PAGE 2 Contents Abstract 7 Declaration 9 Copyright 11 Acknowledgements 13 Publications by the Author 15 1 Introduction 19 1.1 Unit Independence . 20 1.2 Reparametrisation Invariance in Quantum Field Theories . 24 1.3 Example: Complex Scalar Field . 25 1.4 Outline . 31 1.5 Conventions . 34 2 Field Space Covariance 35 2.1 Riemannian Geometry . 35 2.1.1 Manifolds . 35 2.1.2 Tensors . 36 2.1.3 Connections and the Covariant Derivative . 37 2.1.4 Distances on the Manifold . 38 2.1.5 Curvature of a Manifold . 39 2.1.6 Local Normal Coordinates and the Vielbein Formalism 41 2.1.7 Submanifolds and Induced Metrics . 42 2.1.8 The Geodesic Equation . 42 2.1.9 Isometries . 43 2.2 The Field Space . 44 2.2.1 Interpretation of the Field Space . 48 3 2.3 The Configuration Space . 50 2.4 Parametrisation Dependence of Standard Approaches to Quan- tum Field Theory . 52 2.4.1 Feynman Diagrams . 53 2.4.2 The Effective Action . 56 2.5 Covariant Approaches to Quantum Field Theory . 59 2.5.1 Covariant Feynman Diagrams . 59 2.5.2 The Vilkovisky–DeWitt Effective Action . 62 2.6 Example: Complex Scalar Field . 66 3 Frame Covariance in Quantum Gravity 69 3.1 The Cosmological Frame Problem .
    [Show full text]
  • Observational Cosmology - 30H Course 218.163.109.230 Et Al
    Observational cosmology - 30h course 218.163.109.230 et al. (2004–2014) PDF generated using the open source mwlib toolkit. See http://code.pediapress.com/ for more information. PDF generated at: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 03:42:03 UTC Contents Articles Observational cosmology 1 Observations: expansion, nucleosynthesis, CMB 5 Redshift 5 Hubble's law 19 Metric expansion of space 29 Big Bang nucleosynthesis 41 Cosmic microwave background 47 Hot big bang model 58 Friedmann equations 58 Friedmann–Lemaître–Robertson–Walker metric 62 Distance measures (cosmology) 68 Observations: up to 10 Gpc/h 71 Observable universe 71 Structure formation 82 Galaxy formation and evolution 88 Quasar 93 Active galactic nucleus 99 Galaxy filament 106 Phenomenological model: LambdaCDM + MOND 111 Lambda-CDM model 111 Inflation (cosmology) 116 Modified Newtonian dynamics 129 Towards a physical model 137 Shape of the universe 137 Inhomogeneous cosmology 143 Back-reaction 144 References Article Sources and Contributors 145 Image Sources, Licenses and Contributors 148 Article Licenses License 150 Observational cosmology 1 Observational cosmology Observational cosmology is the study of the structure, the evolution and the origin of the universe through observation, using instruments such as telescopes and cosmic ray detectors. Early observations The science of physical cosmology as it is practiced today had its subject material defined in the years following the Shapley-Curtis debate when it was determined that the universe had a larger scale than the Milky Way galaxy. This was precipitated by observations that established the size and the dynamics of the cosmos that could be explained by Einstein's General Theory of Relativity.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1707.01092V2 [Gr-Qc]
    September 2017 Holographic Entanglement Entropy and Cyclic Cosmology Paul H. Frampton∗ Dipartimento di Matematica e Fisica ”Ennio De Giorgi” Universit`adel Salento and INFN Lecce, Via Arnesano 73100 Lecce,Italy. Abstract We discuss a cyclic cosmology in which the visible universe, or introverse, is all that is accessible to an observer while the extroverse represents the total spacetime originating from the time when the dark energy began to dominate. It is argued that entanglement entropy of the introverse is the more appropriate quantity to render infinitely cyclic, rather than the entropy of the total universe. Since vanishing entanglement entropy implies disconnected spacetimes, at the turnaround when the introverse entropy is zero the disconnected extroverse can be jettisoned with impunity. arXiv:1707.01092v2 [gr-qc] 1 Sep 2017 ∗email: [email protected] 1 Introduction Cyclic cosmology with an infinite number of cycles which include – expansion, turnaround, contraction, bounce – is an appealing theory, and one of the most recent attempts at a solution was in [1]. As emphasized first by Tolman [2,3], entropy and the second law of thermodynamics provide a significant challenge to implementing a cyclic theory. The approach was based on the so-called Come Back Empty (CBE) principle which chooses the turnaround as the point in the cycles where entropy is jettisoned. A successful universe must be selected with zero entropy at the turnaround to begin an adiabatic contraction to the bounce while empty of all matter including black holes. In this article we provide a better understanding of CBE based on the holographic principle [4–6].
    [Show full text]
  • Ads/CFT and Black Holes - Lecture 3
    2230-3 Spring School on Superstring Theory and Related Topics 28 March - 5 April, 2011 AdS/CFT and Black Holes - Lecture 3 A. MALONEY McGill University Montreal Canada A de Sitter Farey Tail ICTP Alex Maloney, McGill University Castro, Lashkari & A. M. Overview The Problem Quantum cosmology is confusing: What are the appropriate observables for eternal inflation? What is the meaning and origin of the entropy of a cosmological horizon? Is quantum mechanics the right language to describe cosmology? We were able to answer analogous questions about black hole physics using AdS/CFT. Let us be bold and apply the same techniques to cosmology. de Sitter Space de Sitter space is the maximally symmetric solution of general relativity with a positive cosmological constant. √ 1 − − 2 S(g)= g R 2 G M The universe inflates eternally. The three dimensional theory can be solved exactly, in the sense that the partition function − [ ] Z = Dge S g can be computed exactly. We will be inspired by AdS/CFT but we will not use it. The Idea The saddle point approximation is 1 −S[g] −kS0+S1+ S2+... Z = Dge = e k g0 where k = /G is the coupling. The approximation becomes exact if we can Find all classical saddles Compute all perturbative corrections around each saddle We can do it! The new classical saddles have a straightforward physical interpretation and lead to quantum gravitational effects for de Sitter observers. The Plan for Today: • The de Sitter Farey Tail • The Partition Function • Discussion Causal Structure of de Sitter Eternal inflation is the ultimate existential nightmare.
    [Show full text]
  • Xavier Calmet Editor Quantum Aspects of Black Holes Fundamental Theories of Physics
    Fundamental Theories of Physics 178 Xavier Calmet Editor Quantum Aspects of Black Holes Fundamental Theories of Physics Volume 178 Series editors Henk van Beijeren Philippe Blanchard Paul Busch Bob Coecke Dennis Dieks Detlef Dürr Roman Frigg Christopher Fuchs Giancarlo Ghirardi Domenico J.W. Giulini Gregg Jaeger Claus Kiefer Nicolaas P. Landsman Christian Maes Hermann Nicolai Vesselin Petkov Alwyn van der Merwe Rainer Verch R.F. Werner Christian Wuthrich More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/6001 Xavier Calmet Editor Quantum Aspects of Black Holes 123 Editor Xavier Calmet Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Sussex Brighton UK ISBN 978-3-319-10851-3 ISBN 978-3-319-10852-0 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-10852-0 Library of Congress Control Number: 2014951685 Springer Cham Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. Exempted from this legal reservation are brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis or material supplied specifically for the purpose of being entered and executed on a computer system, for exclusive use by the purchaser of the work. Duplication of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the Copyright Law of the Publisher’s location, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1511.02114V5
    Hawking modes and the optimal disperser : Holographic lessons from the observer’s causal-patch unitarity J. Koohbor (a) ∗, M. Nouri-Zonoz (a)† and A. Tavanfar (b)(c) ‡ (a): Department of Physics, University of Tehran, North Karegar Ave., Tehran 14395-547, Iran. (b) : Instituto de Telecomunica¸co˜es, Physics of Information and Quantum Technologies Group, Lisbon, Portugal. (c): International Institute of Physics, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, 59078-400 Natal-RN, Brazil. Abstract Based on an observer-centric methodology, we pinpoint the basic origin of the spectral Planckian- ity of the asymptotic Hawking modes in the conventional treatments of the evaporating horizons. By considering an observer who analyzes a causal horizon in a generic spacetime, we first clarify how the asymptotic Planckian spectrum is imposed on the exponentially redshifted Hawking modes through a geometric dispersion mechanism developed by a semiclassical environment which is com- posed by all the modes that build up the curvature of the causal patch of the asymptotic observer. We also discuss the actual microscopic phenomenon of the Hawking evaporation of generic causal horizons. Our quantum description is based on a novel holographic scheme of gravitational open quantum systems in which the degrees of freedom that build up the curvature of the observer’s causal patch interact with the radiated Hawking modes, initially as environmental quanta, and after a crossover time, as quantum defects. Planckian dispersion of the modes would only be de- arXiv:1511.02114v5 [hep-th] 24 Apr 2018 veloped in the strict thermodynamic limit of this quantum environment, called optimal disperser, which is nevertheless avoided holographically.
    [Show full text]