DOCSLIB.ORG

United States of America

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA + + + + + COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS + + + + + MEETING + + + + + Friday, October 13, 2006 + + + + + The meeting was held in Room 540 of 624 Ninth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C., at 9:00 a.m., Gerald A. Reynolds, Chairman, presiding. PRESENT: GERALD A. REYNOLDS, CHAIRMAN ASHLEY L. TAYLOR, COMMISSIONER ARLAN D. MELENDEZ, COMMISSIONER MICHAEL YAKI, COMMISSIONER PETER N. KIRSANOW, COMMISSIONER JENNIFER C. BRACERAS, COMMISSIONER STAFF PRESENT: KENNETH L. MARCUS, STAFF DIRECTOR DAVID BLACKWOOD, ESQ., GENERAL COUNSEL MANUEL ALBA, PUBLIC AFFAIRS UNIT TYRO BEATTY, HUMAN RESOURCES DIVISION NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1323 RHODE ISLAND AVE., N.W. (202) 234-4433 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-3701 www.nealrgross.com 2 STAFF PRESENT (Continued): MARGARET BUTLER, OFFICE OF CIVIL RIGHTS EVALUATION CHRISTOPHER BYRNES, ESQ., OFFICE OF STAFF DIRECTOR PAMELA DUNSTON, ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES AND CLEARINGHOUSE DIVISION DEREK HORNE, ESQ., OFFICE OF STAFF DIRECTOR SOCK-FOON MACDOUGALL, OFFICE OF CIVIL RIGHTS EVALUATION TINALOUISE MARTIN, OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT BERNARD QUARTERMAN, ESQ., OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL MICHELE YORKMAN RAMEY, IT SPECIALIST RICHARD SCHMECHEL, SPECIAL ASSISTANT TO COMMISSIONER MELENDEZ KIMBERLY SCHULDZ, SPECIAL ASSISTANT TO COMMISSIONER BRACERAS NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1323 RHODE ISLAND AVE., N.W. (202) 234-4433 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-3701 www.nealrgross.com 3 C O N T E N T S PAGE I. Approval of Agenda .......................... 4 II. Approval of Minutes of August 18 Meeting .... 5 III. Staff Director's Report ..................... 6 IV. Program Planning ...........................12 V. State Advisory Committee Issues ............ 44 VI. Briefing on Voter Fraud and Voter Intimidation ..............................108 Dr. Robert A. Pastor ................ 114 Mark F. Hearne, III, Esq. ........... 121 Donna Brazile .......................130 John Fund ...........................138 Adjourn NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1323 RHODE ISLAND AVE., N.W. (202) 234-4433 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-3701 www.nealrgross.com 4 1 P R O C E E D I N G S 2 (9:10 a.m.) 3 CHAIRMAN REYNOLDS: Okay. This meeting will 4 come to order. 5 This is a meeting of the U.S. Commission on 6 Civil Rights at 624 Ninth Street, N.W., Room 540, 7 Washington, D.C. 8 COMMISSIONER YAKI: Zip code? 9 CHAIRMAN REYNOLDS: No zip code. 10 With the exception of the Vice Chair, Abigail 11 Thernstrom, all Commissioners are present. 12 I. Approval of Agenda 13 The first item on the agenda is the approval of 14 the agenda. I would like to move to amend the agenda 15 under Program Planning. I'd like to delete "Research 16 on Academic Mismatch." That's not ready, and the same 17 would be true for "Procedures for National Office Work 18 Products." That's not ready. 19 So with that amendment is there a second? 20 COMMISSIONER BRACERAS: Second. 21 CHAIRMAN REYNOLDS: Discussion? 22 (No response.) 23 CHAIRMAN REYNOLDS: All in favor say aye. 24 (Chorus of ayes.) 25 CHAIRMAN REYNOLDS: Any abstentions? Dissents? NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1323 RHODE ISLAND AVE., N.W. (202) 234-4433 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-3701 www.nealrgross.com 5 1 (No response.) 2 CHAIRMAN REYNOLDS: The motion carries. 3 II. Approval of Minutes of August 18 Meeting 4 Okay. The second item on the agenda is the 5 approval of the minutes of the August 18, 2006 6 meeting. May I have a motion approving the minutes? 7 COMMISSIONER KIRSANOW: So moved. 8 CHAIRMAN REYNOLDS: A second? 9 COMMISSIONER MELENDEZ: Second. 10 CHAIRMAN REYNOLDS: Discussion? 11 (No response.) 12 CHAIRMAN REYNOLDS: All in favor say aye. 13 (Chorus of ayes.) 14 CHAIRMAN REYNOLDS: Any objections? 15 Abstentions? 16 COMMISSIONER YAKI: Question. 17 CHAIRMAN REYNOLDS: Yes. 18 COMMISSIONER YAKI: The August 18th meeting, was 19 that the meeting where all of the votes were voided, a 20 lot of them? 21 MR. MARCUS: That was one of the meetings, yes. 22 COMMISSIONER YAKI: Okay, and are the minutes 23 being recalibrated to reflect that? 24 MR. MARCUS: The minutes do reflect that on page 25 4. NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1323 RHODE ISLAND AVE., N.W. (202) 234-4433 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-3701 www.nealrgross.com 6 1 COMMISSIONER YAKI: Okay. 2 CHAIRMAN REYNOLDS: Okay. Should we vote? 3 Okay. 4 III. Staff Director's Report 5 Okay. Mr. Staff Director, do you have anything 6 to report? 7 MR. MARCUS: Certainly, Mr. Chairman. I think 8 there are a few things that I'd like to report on. 9 First, as the Commissioners know, over the last 10 year and a half we've put in place a number of new 11 procedures and new controls, in order to address the 12 significant management and operations problems that 13 had been recognized in numerous audits. Including GAO 14 and OPM audits, and which we've been talking about 15 over the past years. 16 Our hope is not only to remedy the defects that 17 we've had in the agency, but ultimately to serve as a 18 model of excellence in government administration. And 19 to provide best practices that can be emulated 20 throughout the government. 21 I don't think that we have reached that yet, 22 with respect to all of our management and operations 23 issues, and we have still quite a number of challenges 24 to deal with, but we do have staff members who are 25 working diligently to try not only to correct past NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1323 RHODE ISLAND AVE., N.W. (202) 234-4433 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-3701 www.nealrgross.com 7 1 deficiencies, but to provide best practices. 2 I'm very pleased that our human resources 3 activities have been recognized through best practices 4 within the last month. In particular, our new 5 Director of Human Resources has put in place a 6 recruitment system to implement the OPM career 7 patterns, which has been recognized by OPM. They have 8 asked our HR Director to be one of three HR leaders to 9 provide best practices in a significant 10 intergovernmental meeting last month. They've also 11 asked to give other sorts of input from the Commission 12 based on our early experience getting very good 13 results from our application of the career patterns. 14 I think that we are indebted to our new Director 15 of HR, Tyro Beatty, who has come on board and helped 16 us to provide not just a remedy for weaknesses, but 17 for some early best practices that have already been 18 recognized. 19 CHAIRMAN REYNOLDS: Okay, and would you also 20 talk about the activity, the meeting that was held in 21 Connecticut by the Connecticut SAC? 22 MR. MARCUS: I'd be pleased to, Mr. Chairman. 23 I did have the opportunity to travel to Hartford 24 last month to attend the meeting of the Connecticut 25 State Advisory Committee. This is the first meeting NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1323 RHODE ISLAND AVE., N.W. (202) 234-4433 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-3701 www.nealrgross.com 8 1 of the newly chartered Connecticut State Advisory 2 Committee, and I think it is one of the most exciting 3 events that we've had in our State Advisory Committee 4 system, in quite some time. 5 The Connecticut SAC had been dormant for a 6 significant period. I spoke with long time members 7 who had never attended a Connecticut SAC event, simply 8 because, there had not been meetings in the past for 9 resource problems and other issues. 10 The Connecticut SAC, as you know, was very 11 recently re-chartered by this Commission. It was re- 12 chartered only last month, and I am pleased that the 13 event signaled that we have within the State of 14 Connecticut a newly vigorous presence. The meeting 15 was conducted in the State House in Hartford. It 16 featured participation by the Mayor of Hartford, a 17 senior representative of the Office of the Governor, 18 well known government officials at a municipal level, 19 and a wide variety of speakers representing different 20 perspectives, different political perspectives, 21 perspectives from different stakeholders, different 22 takes on the issue. 23 The issue was school choice, as a civil rights 24 issue. There were members of the panel who were not 25 familiar with the issue, and I think they learned a NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1323 RHODE ISLAND AVE., N.W. (202) 234-4433 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-3701 www.nealrgross.com 9 1 great deal. There were also members of the panel who 2 were rather expert on the topic, and even they learned 3 a great deal. 4 The panel itself, I think, worked together in an 5 exemplary fashion. It is a new group composed of both 6 returning members and also new members. It is, I 7 would say, an unusually distinguished group of with a 8 wide variety of individuals. 9 I was really pleased to meet some of these 10 people, who I think are among the leading citizens of 11 the state of Connecticut. They included the Pastor of 12 the First Cathedral Baptist Church in Bloomfield, 13 which is one of the largest churches in New England, 14 and certainly one of the largest predominantly 15 minority churches. 16 One of the leading civil rights litigators in 17 the state of Connecticut, the President of the 18 Connecticut Institute of the Blind, the Shelby Cullen 19 Davis Professor of American Business and Economic 20 Enterprise, a Chairman of the East End Community 21 Council and a Veteran of the Bridgeport Police 22 Department, a Legislative Analyst for the Connecticut 23 Latino and Puerto Rican Affairs Commission, the 24 Director of the Asian American Cultural Center at the 25 University of Connecticut at Stores, the Indian NEAL R.
Recommended publications
  • Federal Election Commission 1 2 First General Counsel's

    Federal Election Commission 1 2 First General Counsel's

    MUR759900019 1 FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 2 3 FIRST GENERAL COUNSEL’S REPORT 4 5 MUR 7304 6 DATE COMPLAINT FILED: December 15, 2017 7 DATE OF NOTIFICATIONS: December 21, 2017 8 DATE LAST RESPONSE RECEIVED September 4, 2018 9 DATE ACTIVATED: May 3, 2018 10 11 EARLIEST SOL: September 10, 2020 12 LATEST SOL: December 31, 2021 13 ELECTION CYCLE: 2016 14 15 COMPLAINANT: Committee to Defend the President 16 17 RESPONDENTS: Hillary Victory Fund and Elizabeth Jones in her official capacity as 18 treasurer 19 Hillary Rodham Clinton 20 Hillary for America and Elizabeth Jones in her official capacity as 21 treasurer 22 DNC Services Corporation/Democratic National Committee and 23 William Q. Derrough in his official capacity as treasurer 24 Alaska Democratic Party and Carolyn Covington in her official 25 capacity as treasurer 26 Democratic Party of Arkansas and Dawne Vandiver in her official 27 capacity as treasurer 28 Colorado Democratic Party and Rita Simas in her official capacity 29 as treasurer 30 Democratic State Committee (Delaware) and Helene Keeley in her 31 official capacity as treasurer 32 Democratic Executive Committee of Florida and Francesca Menes 33 in her official capacity as treasurer 34 Georgia Federal Elections Committee and Kip Carr in his official 35 capacity as treasurer 36 Idaho State Democratic Party and Leroy Hayes in his official 37 capacity as treasurer 38 Indiana Democratic Congressional Victory Committee and Henry 39 Fernandez in his official capacity as treasurer 40 Iowa Democratic Party and Ken Sagar in his official capacity as 41 treasurer 42 Kansas Democratic Party and Bill Hutton in his official capacity as 43 treasurer 44 Kentucky State Democratic Central Executive Committee and M.
  • H-Diplo Roundtables, Vol. XII, No. 6

    H-Diplo Roundtables, Vol. XII, No. 6

    2011 H-Diplo Roundtable Editors: Thomas Maddux and Diane Labrosse H-Diplo Roundtable Review Roundtable Web/Production Editor: George Fujii www.h-net.org/~diplo/roundtables Volume XII, No. 6 (2011) Introduction by Fred Greenstein, Princeton University 1 March 2011 (Emeritus) Betty Glad. An Outsider in the White House: Jimmy Carter, His Advisors, and the Making of American Foreign Policy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2009. 414 pages, 6 x 9, 2 tables, 16 halftones. ISBN: 978-0-8014-4815-7 ($29.95, cloth). Stable URL: http://www.h-net.org/~diplo/roundtables/PDF/Roundtable-XII-6.pdf Contents Introduction by Fred Greenstein, Princeton University (Emeritus) .......................................... 2 Review by Erwin C. Hargrove, Vanderbilt University ................................................................ 5 Review by Scott Kaufman, Francis Marion University .............................................................. 9 Review by Robert A. Pastor, American University .................................................................. 14 Review by Robert A. Strong, Washington and Lee University ................................................ 21 Copyright © 2011 H-Net: Humanities and Social Sciences Online. H-Net permits the redistribution and reprinting of this work for non-profit, educational purposes, with full and accurate attribution to the author(s), web location, date of publication, H-Diplo, and H-Net: Humanities & Social Sciences Online. For other uses, contact the H-Diplo editorial staff at [email protected]. H-Diplo Roundtable Reviews, Vol. XII, No. 6 (2011) Introduction by Fred Greenstein, Princeton University (Emeritus) f Betty Glad were alive, she could not fail to be pleased by the following largely favorable I reviews of her final book. Alas, she died on 2 August 2010 at the age of 87.1 1 OBITUARY of Dr. Betty Glad from H-Diplo, August 17, 2010 Written by Professors Daniel Sabia, Jr.
  • Update 2013 Mission Statement

    Update 2013 Mission Statement

    LATIN AMERICAN PROGRAM UPDATE 2013 MISSION STATEMENT The Latin American Program and its institutes scholars, analysts, and public officials from the on Mexico and Brazil serve as a bridge between United States, Latin America, and around the the United States and Latin America, providing world. The Program and its related Institutes a nonpartisan forum for experts from through- host scores of events each year in Washington, out the region and the world to discuss the D.C., and throughout Latin America. These most critical issues facing the Hemisphere. The events allow researchers, members of the Program sponsors research, conferences, and policymaking community, the media, and the publications aimed at deepening the understand- general public to keep apprised of current ing of Latin American and Caribbean politics, thinking in and about Latin America on a broad history, economics, culture, and U.S.-Latin range of critical issues. American relations. By bringing pressing regional concerns to the attention of opinion leaders and The Program conducts outreach to members of policymakers, the Program contributes to more the U.S. Congress and their staffs, aimed at broad- informed policy choices in Washington, D.C., ening congressional understanding of key issues in and throughout the Hemisphere. bilateral U.S.-Latin American relations. In coopera- tion with the Wilson Center on the Hill project, the The Latin American Program coordinates an Program sponsors trips to the region for members active program of public meetings featuring of Congress
  • National Press Club Luncheon with Marc Morial, President, National Urban League

    National Press Club Luncheon with Marc Morial, President, National Urban League

    NATIONAL PRESS CLUB LUNCHEON WITH MARC MORIAL, PRESIDENT, NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE MODERATOR: JONATHAN SALANT, NPC PRESIDENT LOCATION: NATIONAL PRESS CLUB BALLROOM, WASHINGTON, D.C. TIME: 1:00 P.M. EST DATE: TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 14, 2006 (C) COPYRIGHT 2005, FEDERAL NEWS SERVICE, INC., 1000 VERMONT AVE. NW; 5TH FLOOR; WASHINGTON, DC - 20005, USA. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. ANY REPRODUCTION, REDISTRIBUTION OR RETRANSMISSION IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED. UNAUTHORIZED REPRODUCTION, REDISTRIBUTION OR RETRANSMISSION CONSTITUTES A MISAPPROPRIATION UNDER APPLICABLE UNFAIR COMPETITION LAW, AND FEDERAL NEWS SERVICE, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO PURSUE ALL REMEDIES AVAILABLE TO IT IN RESPECT TO SUCH MISAPPROPRIATION. FEDERAL NEWS SERVICE, INC. IS A PRIVATE FIRM AND IS NOT AFFILIATED WITH THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. NO COPYRIGHT IS CLAIMED AS TO ANY PART OF THE ORIGINAL WORK PREPARED BY A UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT OFFICER OR EMPLOYEE AS PART OF THAT PERSON'S OFFICIAL DUTIES. FOR INFORMATION ON SUBSCRIBING TO FNS, PLEASE CALL JACK GRAEME AT 202-347-1400. ------------------------- MR. SALANT: Good afternoon, and welcome to the National Press Club. My name is Jonathan Salant, a reporter for Bloomberg News and president of the club. I'd like to welcome club members and their guests in the audience, as well as those of you watching on C-SPAN. Please hold your applause during the speech so we have time for as many questions as possible. For our broadcast audience, I'd like to explain that if you hear applause, it is from the guests and the members of the general public who attend our luncheons, not from the working press. The video archive of today's luncheon is provided by ConnectLive and is available to members only through the National Press Club website at www.press.org.
  • Verified Complaint

    Verified Complaint

    Case 1:18-cv-00888-RDM Document 1 Filed 04/16/18 Page 1 of 20 U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) COMMITTEE TO DEFEND THE ) PRESIDENT, ) 203 South Union Street, Suite 300 ) Alexandria, VA 22314 ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, ) 1050 First Street NE ) Washington, DC 20463, ) ) Defendant, ) _______________________________________) VERIFIED COMPLAINT Plaintiff COMMITTEE TO DEFEND THE PRESIDENT brings this action for injunctive and declaratory relief and alleges as follows: INTRODUCTION 1. This lawsuit seeks to compel the Federal Election Commission (“FEC”) to take action on an administrative complaint the Committee to Defend the President (“CDP”) filed with the FEC four months ago disclosing the existence of an unprecedented nationwide scheme to violate federal campaign finance law in which $84 million was effectively laundered over more than a year by the Hillary Victory Fund (“HVF”) through dozens of state political party committees to the Democratic National Committee (“DNC”) and, ultimately, to Hillary for America (“HFA”). 2. The 2016 Democratic Presidential nominee Hillary Rodham Clinton; Hillary Victory Fund, Clinton’s joint fundraising committee; Hillary for America, Clinton’s campaign committee; the DNC; and dozens of Democratic state parties across the country entered 1 Case 1:18-cv-00888-RDM Document 1 Filed 04/16/18 Page 2 of 20 into the exact type of arrangement the Supreme Court declared in McCutcheon v. FEC would so flagrantly violate campaign finance law that it was “unlikely” to occur. The Court was unable to anticipate the extent and sheer audacity with which Democrats would conspire to circumvent, evade, and effectively nullify candidate contribution limits.
  • Finding Aid to the Historymakers ® Video Oral History with the Honorable Yvonne Atkinson Gates

    Finding Aid to the Historymakers ® Video Oral History with the Honorable Yvonne Atkinson Gates

    Finding Aid to The HistoryMakers ® Video Oral History with The Honorable Yvonne Atkinson Gates Overview of the Collection Repository: The HistoryMakers®1900 S. Michigan Avenue Chicago, Illinois 60616 [email protected] www.thehistorymakers.com Creator: Gates, Yvonne Atkinson, 1956- Title: The HistoryMakers® Video Oral History Interview with The Honorable Yvonne Atkinson Gates, Dates: September 25, 2016 Bulk Dates: 2016 Physical 5 uncompressed MOV digital video files (2:25:14). Description: Abstract: Political leader Yvonne Atkinson Gates (1956 - ) represented District D on the Clark County Board of Commissioners, where she was the first African American woman to serve as chair. Gates was interviewed by The HistoryMakers® on September 25, 2016, in Denver, Colorado. This collection is comprised of the original video footage of the interview. Identification: A2016_061 Language: The interview and records are in English. Biographical Note by The HistoryMakers® Political leader Yvonne Atkinson Gates was born on June 10, 1956 in Henderson, Nevada to Bobbie Davis Atkinson and Eddie Atkinson. Gates graduated from Ed W. Clark High School in Las Vegas and went on to earn her B.S. degree in political science and journalism in 1979, her M.P.A. degree in 1982, and her Ph.D. degree in public administration in 2012, all from the University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Following her graduation from the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Gates Following her graduation from the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Gates worked as the research and planning manager for Clark County’s Department of Social Service, as well as personnel manager for Clark County’s Department of Aviation.
  • The Public Eye, Spring 2008

    The Public Eye, Spring 2008

    The New Secular Fundamentalist Conspiracy!, p. 3 TheA PUBLICATION OF POLITICAL RESEARCH PublicEye ASSOCIATES SPRING 2008 • Volume XXIII, No.1 $5.25 The North American Union Right-wing Populist Conspiracism Rebounds By Chip Berlet he same right-wing populist fears of Ta collectivist one-world government and new world order that fueled Cold War anticommunism, mobilized opposition to the Civil Rights Movement, and spawned the armed citizens militia movement in the 1990s, have resurfaced as an elaborate conspiracy theory about the alleged impending creation of a North American Union that would merge the United States, Canada, and Mexico.1 No such merger is seriously being con- templated by any of the three govern- ments. Yet a conspiracy theory about the North American Union (NAU) simmered in right-wing “Patriot Movement” alter- native media for several years before bub- bling up to reach larger audiences in the Ron Wurzer/Getty Images Wurzer/Getty Ron Dr. James Dobson, founder of the Christian Right group Focus on the Family, with the slogan of the moment. North American Union continues on page 11 IN THIS ISSUE Pushed to the Altar Commentary . 2 The Right-Wing Roots of Marriage Promotion The New Secular Fundamentalist Conspiracy! . 3 By Jean V. Hardisty especially welfare recipients, to marry. The fter the 2000 presidential campaign, I rationale was that marriage would cure their Reports in Review . 28 Afelt a shock of recognition when I read poverty. Wade Horn, appointed by Bush to that the George W. Bush Administration be in charge of welfare programs at the Now online planned to use its “faith-based” funding to Department of Health and Human Services www.publiceye.org .
  • January 2016 Sunday Morning Talk Show Data

    January 2016 Sunday Morning Talk Show Data

    January 2016 Sunday Morning Talk Show Data January 3, 2016 23 men and 13 women NBC's Meet the Press with Chuck Todd: 7 men and 4 women Gov. John Kasich (M) Sen. Rand Paul (M) Hallie Jackson (F) Kristen Welker (F) Capt. Mark Kelly (M) Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick (M) Chris Matthews (M) Jennifer Rubin (F) Sara Fagen (F) Eugene Robinson (M) Richard Dorment (M) CBS's Face the Nation with John Dickerson: 5 men and 2 women Donald Trump (M) Ruth Marcus (F) Reihan Salam (M) Molly Ball (F) Jonathan Martin (M) Michael Morrell (M) Thomas Donilon (M) ABC's This Week with Martha Raddatz in for George Stephanopoulos: 5 men and 1 woman Dr. Ben Carson (M) Sen. Bernie Sanders (M) Alex Castellanos (M) Van Jones (M) Matt Bai (M) Alice Stewart (F) CNN's State of the Union with Dana Bash in for Jake Tapper: 3 men and 3 women Carly Fiorina (F) Sen. Bernie Sanders (M) Rep. Dave Brat (M) Donna Brazile (F) Bakari Sellers (M) Ana Navarro (F) Fox News' Fox News Sunday with Chris Wallace: 3 men and 3 women Gov. Chris Christie (M) Gov. Jeb Bush (M) Laura Ingraham (F) Susan Page (F) Michael Needham (M) Kirsten Powers (F) January 10, 2016 27 men and 9 women NBC's Meet the Press with Chuck Todd: 6 men and 2 women Donald Trump (M) ● Denis McDonough (M) ● Alex Castellanos (M) ● Ben Ginsberg (M) ● Helene Cooper (F) ● Robert Costa (M) ● Jeff Greenfield (M) ● Jennifer Jacobs (F) CBS's Face the Nation with John Dickerson: 5 men and 3 women ● House Speaker Paul Ryan (M) ● Sec.
  • Arxiv:1910.00149V2 [Physics.Soc-Ph] 11 Jan 2021 Examples Abound

    Arxiv:1910.00149V2 [Physics.Soc-Ph] 11 Jan 2021 Examples Abound

    Fame and Ultrafame: Measuring and comparing daily levels of `being talked about' for United States' presidents, their rivals, God, countries, and K-pop Peter Sheridan Dodds,1, 2, ∗ Joshua R. Minot,1 Michael V. Arnold,1 Thayer Alshaabi,1 Jane Lydia Adams,1 David Rushing Dewhurst,1 Andrew J. Reagan,3 and Christopher M. Danforth1, 2 1Computational Story Lab, Vermont Complex Systems Center, MassMutual Center of Excellence for Complex Systems and Data Science, Vermont Advanced Computing Core, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05401. 2Department of Mathematics & Statistics, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05401. 3MassMutual Data Science, Amherst, MA 01002. (Dated: January 12, 2021) When building a global brand of any kind|a political actor, clothing style, or belief system| developing widespread awareness is a primary goal. Short of knowing any of the stories or products of a brand, being talked about in whatever fashion|raw fame|is, as Oscar Wilde would have it, better than not being talked about at all. Here, we measure, examine, and contrast the day-to-day raw fame dynamics on Twitter for US Presidents and major US Presidential candidates from 2008 to 2020: Barack Obama, John McCain, Mitt Romney, Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump, and Joe Biden. We assign \lexical fame" to be the number and (Zipfian) rank of the (lowercased) mentions made for each individual across all languages. We show that all five political figures have at some point reached extraordinary volume levels of what we define to be \lexical ultrafame": An overall rank of approximately 300 or less which is largely the realm of function words and demarcated by the highly stable rank of `god'.
  • Introduction

    Introduction

    1 Introduction Peter Hakim and Robert E. Litan When it came into force on January 1, 1994, the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) joined the eco- nomic futures of Canada, Mexico, and the United States. Clearly both Canada and Mexico—given their geography and markets—had been integrating with the United States well before NAFTA took effect. Indeed, the United States and Canada had signed a bilateral free trade accord six years earlier. But, with NAFTA in place, the pace of inte- gration accelerated, and systematic rules governing trade and investment along with dispute resolution mechanisms were established, and the governments assumed an active role in guiding, promoting, and managing economic rela- tions among the three countries. Moreover, the three coun- tries are increasingly viewed as a single economic entity, one with a gross domestic product (GDP) of some $10 tril- 1 2 Introduction lion, or 15 percent larger than the fifteen-country European Union (EU). What then lies ahead for North America? As it stands, NAFTA takes a narrow view of integration, focusing almost exclusively on trade and investment matters, steering clear of any new institutional, social, or development arrange- ments. NAFTA barely addresses such vital issues as immi- gration policy and labor markets, the energy sector, envi- ronmental protection, and law enforcement. Moreover, despite their trilateral relationship, the three governments of North America largely conduct business within the frame- work of two bilateral relationships, that is, between Canada and the United States and between Mexico and the United States. The governments of Canada, Mexico, and the United States now must confront the question of whether NAFTA is enough.
  • Listen and Learn at Annual Awards Dinner

    Listen and Learn at Annual Awards Dinner

    COVER STORY “We march on toward the realization of the American Dream. We are not diverted by those who would deny opportunity based on what we look like or where we came from or who would deny equality based on who we love.” – Donna Brazile Speaker duos for the Indiana Chamber’s Annual Awards celebration are not new. Watergate reporters Bob BRAZILE Woodward and Carl Bernstein took center stage in 2012. James Carville has been part of two such occasions – with wife &PERINO Mary Matalin in 2006 and Republican counterpart Karl Listen and Learn at Annual Rove in 2018. Awards Dinner By Brenda L. Holmes Two women with different political perspectives (but a common employer in Fox News) will be in the spotlight on November 7 at the 30th Annual Awards Dinner. Learn more here about Donna Brazile and Dana Perino. Be sure to listen to IN Chamber podcast conversations with each, scheduled to air in September. “I was raised to believe that America was a force for good in the world and that it should take its leadership role seriously.” – Dana Perino 12 BizVoice/Indiana Chamber – September/October 2019 “Politics is a rough and tumble business. It's not for the “If a political opponent has different approaches than faint-hearted. I've got bruises and cuts from being in the mine, that doesn’t make them a bad person. It means they political arena. But by and large, I understand how to have different backgrounds, experiences and ideas.” navigate the process.” – Dana Perino – Donna Brazile Donna Brazile Dana Perino • Hometown: New Orleans, Louisiana • Hometown: Born in Evanston, Wyoming.
  • Voter Fraud and Intimidation, Including Increased Voter Education, Providing Voter Ids Free of Charge and Expanding the Base of Registered Voters.2

    Voter Fraud and Intimidation, Including Increased Voter Education, Providing Voter Ids Free of Charge and Expanding the Base of Registered Voters.2

    U.S. Commission on Civil Rights Briefing Report • April 2006 Reauthorization of the Temporary Provisions of The Voting Rights Act An Examination of the Act’s Section 5 Preclearance Provision U.S. Commission on Civil Rights Washington, DC 20425 Official Business Penalty for Private Use $300 Visit us on the Web: www.usccr.gov Voter Fraud and Voter Intimidation A Briefing Before The United States Commission on Civil Rights Held in Washington, DC, October 13, 2006 Briefing Report U.S. Commission on Civil Rights The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights is an independent, bipartisan agency established by Congress in 1957. It is directed to: • Investigate complaints alleging that citizens are being deprived of their right to vote by reason of their race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, or national origin, or by reason of fraudulent practices. • Study and collect information relating to discrimination or a denial of equal protection of the laws under the Constitution because of race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, or national origin, or in the administration of justice. • Appraise federal laws and policies with respect to discrimination or denial of equal protection of the laws because of race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, or national origin, or in the administration of justice. • Serve as a national clearinghouse for information in respect to discrimination or denial of equal protection of the laws because of race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, or national origin. • Submit reports, findings, and recommendations to the President and Congress. • Issue public service announcements to discourage discrimination or denial of equal protection of the laws.