DOCSLIB.ORG

Geometric and Topological Phases with Applications to Quantum Com- Putation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Geometric and Topological Phases with Applications to Quantum Com- Putation ! " # $ %& '#()* *()+, ## ,)-*()#) !#.)*,) !!#.# /00/ Dissertation for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Physics with Specialization in Quantum Chemistry presented at Uppsala University in 2002 Abstract Ericsson, M., 2002. Geometric and Topological Phases with Applications to Quantum Com- putation. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Science and Technology 744. 53 pp. Uppsala. ISBN 91-554-5391-0. Quantum phenomena related to geometric and topological phases are investigated. The first results presented are theoretical extensions of these phases and related effects. Also experimen- tal proposals to measure some of the described effects are outlined. Thereafter, applications of geometric and topological phases in quantum computation are discussed. The notion of geometric phases is extended to cover mixed states undergoing unitary evo- lutions in interferometry. A comparison with a previously proposed definition of a mixed state geometric phase is made. In addition, an experimental test distinguishing these two phase con- cepts is proposed. Furthermore, an interferometry based geometric phase is introduced for systems undergoing evolutions described by completely positive maps. The dynamics of an Aharonov-Bohm system is investigated within the adiabatic approxima- tion. It is shown that the time-reversal symmetry for a semi-fluxon, a particle with an associated magnetic flux which carries half a flux unit, is unexpectedly broken due to the Aharonov-Casher modification in the adiabatic approximation. The Aharonov-Casher Hamiltonian is used to determine the energy quantisation of neutral magnetic dipoles in electric fields. It is shown that for specific electric field configurations, one may acquire energy quantisation similar to the Landau effect for a charged particle in a homogeneous magnetic field. We furthermore show how the geometric phase can be used to implement fault tolerant quantum computations. Such computations are robust to area preserving perturbations from the environment. Topological fault-tolerant quantum computations based on the Aharonov-Casher set up are also investigated. Key words: Geometric phase, topological phase, quantum computation, mixed states, com- pletely positive maps. Marie Ericsson, Department of Quantum Chemistry, Uppsala University, Box 518, SE–751 20 Uppsala, Sweden c Marie Ericsson 2002 ISSN 1104-232X ISBN 91-554-5391-0 Printed in Sweden by Geotryckeriet, Uppsala 2002 To my family and grandfather IV V List of publications This thesis is based on the following papers, which will be referred to in the text by their Roman numerals: I Geometric phases for mixed states in interferometry E. Sj¨oqvist, A.K. Pati, A. Ekert, J.S. Anandan, M. Ericsson, D.K.L. Oi, and V. Vedral, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 (2000) 2845. II Mixed state geometric phases, entangled systems, and local unitary transformations M. Ericsson, A.K. Pati, E. Sj¨oqvist, J. Br¨annlund, and D.K.L. Oi, submitted to Phys. Rev. Lett. quant-ph/0206063 III Generalization of geometric phase to completely positive maps M. Ericsson, E. Sj¨oqvist, J. Br¨annlund, D. K.L. Oi, and A. K. Pati, submitted to Phys. Rev. Lett. quant-ph/0205160. IV Mobile flux line in an Aharonov-Bohm system E. Sj¨oqvist and M. Ericsson, Phys. Rev. A 60 (1999) 1850. V Towards a quantum Hall effect for atoms using electric fields M. Ericsson and E. Sj¨oqvist, Phys. Rev. A 65 (2002) 013607. VI Geometric quantum computation A. Ekert, M. Ericsson, P. Hayden, H. Inamori, J.A. Jones, D.K.L. Oi, and V. Vedral, J. Mod. Opt.47 (2000) 2501. VII Quantum computation using the Aharonov-Casher set up M. Ericsson and E. Sj¨oqvist, submitted to Phys. Lett. A. quant-ph/0209006 Other papers not included in the thesis are: i) “Density Functional Study of Chlorine-Oxygen Compounds Related to the ClO Self- Reaction” T. F¨angstr¨om, D. Edvardsson, M. Ericsson, S. Lunell, and C. Enkvist, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 66, (1997) 203. ¢ ii) “Degree of electron-nuclear entanglement in the E ¡ Jahn-Teller system” M. Ericsson, E. Sj¨oqvist, and O. Goscinski, Proceedings of the XIV International Symposium on Electron-Phonon Dynamics and Jahn-Teller Effect (World Scientific, Singapore, 1999). iii) “Dlaczego kot Schr¨odingera la¸duje na czterech łapach?” (English title: Why Schr¨odinger’s cat lands on its feet) M. Ericsson and E. Sj¨oqvist, Delta, 11, (2001) 1. iv) “Holonomic quantum logic gates” M. Ericsson, To be published in ”Quantum Theory: Reconsideration of Foundations”, ed. by A. Khren- nikov; series “Math. Modeling in Physics, Engineering and Cognitive Sciences” V¨axj¨o Univ. Press (2002). http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/quantph/0202106. v) Reply to “Singularities of the mixed state phase” J. Anandan, E. Sj¨oqvist, A.K. Pati, A. Ekert, M. Ericsson, D.K.L. Oi, and V. Vedral, submitted to Phys. Rev. Lett. quant-ph/0109139. Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Geometric phases 3 2.1 Introduction . ....... 4 2.1.1 Geometric phases in cyclic evolutions.................. 4 2.1.2 Geometric phases in non-cyclic evolutions . ....... 8 2.1.3 MeasurementofPancharatnam’srelativephase............. 9 2.2Mixedstatephases................................ 10 2.3 Phases for completely positive maps....................... 14 3 Topological phases 19 3.1 Introduction . ................................ 20 3.1.1 Aharonov-Bohmphase.......................... 20 3.1.2 Aharonov-Casher phase . 22 3.1.3 Fundamental electromagnetic description . 25 3.2DynamicsofanAharonov-Bohmsystem..................... 26 3.3DualLandaulevels................................ 29 4 Quantum Computation 33 4.1 Introduction . ................................ 34 4.2Geometricquantumcomputation......................... 36 4.3 Topological quantum computation . 40 5 Conclusions 43 VII CONTENTS VIII Chapter 1 Introduction On the scale of human perception the laws of classical physics are good approximations to phenomena around us, such as an apple falling from a tree. But on atomic scales we need to replace classical physics with quantum physics to explain results obtained in experiments. In this thesis I will focus on several fundamental quantum mechanical effects which are related to geometric and topological phases. Quantum physics is indeed very different from classical physics. To illustrate this consider an experiment in which light hits a beam-splitter which reflects half of the light and transmits the rest. If individual photons are sent towards this mirror and we put a photodetector both in the transmitted beam (B) and in the reflected beam (A), as shown in Fig. (1.1), we register a photon with equal probability in detectors A and B. We interpret this as half of the times the A ¨ ¦ ¥ ¦§ © © ¤ ¤ B Figure 1.1: Single photon hitting a beam-splitter has equal probabilities for detection in the photodetectors A and B. photon is transmitted and half reflected. To be able to see the full quantum nature of the photon, we bring the beams together and let them intersect at a second beam-splitter to form a Mach-Zehnder interferometer, as shown in Fig. (1.2). The probability of detecting a photon behind the second beam-splitter is now one for photodetector B and zero for photodetector A 1. This is surprising since if half of the pho- tons were transmitted and half reflected by the first beam-splitter, we would expect the same to happen at the second beam splitter so that half of the photons hit photodetector A and half 1Assuming that the two optical paths are of the same length. 1 2 A ¨ ¦ ¥ ¦§ © © ¤ B ¥ © © ¤ ¤ Figure 1.2: Bringing the beams together on a second beam-splitter gives unit probability for the photon to arrive at photodetector B. hit photodetector B. This prediction does not agree with the experiment and we see that we cannot add probabilities for the different paths to have the overall probability. Instead we have to add probability amplitudes (complex-valued numbers) for every path ending in each pho- todetector, and calculate the probability as the absolute square of this sum. If we follow these rules, assuming that the photon is transmitted with probability amplitude and reflected with probability amplitude , we can calculate the probabilities of detecting the photon in any of the two detectors located after the second beam-splitter. This kind of calculation gives agreement with experiments and makes the classical reasoning that the photon was either re- flected or transmitted invalid since there will be a non-trivial probability amplitude associated to each beam-splitter. This is called single-particle interference and is a fundamental quantum phenomenon. This argument shows that the fundamental object in quantum mechanics is the probability amplitude describing interference effects for particles. We may express such a complex proba- bility amplitude according to ,where and is the associated phase factor. % ' ( In the above example there is a phase factor for the reflected path and for the transmitted path. These phase factors precisely account for the constructive and destructive interference in the above interferometer example. The focus of this thesis is such phase factors. Phases can be of different origin. They can be dynamical when they depend on the speed of the evolution of the quantum system, or geometric when they depend on the geometry of state space [1]. They can also be of topological origin when they depend on the topological structure of the configuration space [2]. The focus of this thesis is on geometric and topological phases. They are described more thoroughly in Chapters 2 and 3. Why study these quantum mechanical phases? First, they help us to understand the structure of quantum physics. Secondly, they have triggered the development of many experimental tech- niques in, e.g., quantum optics, neutron optics, and atomic interferometry, since we need very accurate data to see their effects. Also, a few years ago it was proposed [3, 4] that these phases could be used to perform fault tolerant quantum computation. This latter aspect is described in Chapter 4. Chapter 2 Geometric phases The concept of geometric phase was introduced in 1956 by Pancharatnam [5] in his studies of interference effects of polarised light waves.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Front Matter of the Book Contains a Detailed Table of Contents, Which We Encourage You to Browse
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-00217-3 - Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: 10th Anniversary Edition Michael A. Nielsen & Isaac L. Chuang Frontmatter More information Quantum Computation and Quantum Information 10th Anniversary Edition One of the most cited books in physics of all time, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information remains the best textbook in this exciting field of science. This 10th Anniversary Edition includes a new Introduction and Afterword from the authors setting the work in context. This comprehensive textbook describes such remarkable effects as fast quantum algorithms, quantum teleportation, quantum cryptography, and quantum error-correction. Quantum mechanics and computer science are introduced, before moving on to describe what a quantum computer is, how it can be used to solve problems faster than “classical” computers, and its real-world implementation. It concludes with an in-depth treatment of quantum information. Containing a wealth of figures and exercises, this well-known textbook is ideal for courses on the subject, and will interest beginning graduate students and researchers in physics, computer science, mathematics, and electrical engineering. MICHAEL NIELSEN was educated at the University of Queensland, and as a Fulbright Scholar at the University of New Mexico. He worked at Los Alamos National Laboratory, as the Richard Chace Tolman Fellow at Caltech, was Foundation Professor of Quantum Information Science and a Federation Fellow at the University of Queensland, and a Senior Faculty Member at the Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics. He left Perimeter Institute to write a book about open science and now lives in Toronto. ISAAC CHUANG is a Professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, jointly appointed in Electrical Engineering & Computer Science, and in Physics.
    [Show full text]
  • The Geometrie Phase in Quantum Systems
    A. Bohm A. Mostafazadeh H. Koizumi Q. Niu J. Zwanziger The Geometrie Phase in Quantum Systems Foundations, Mathematical Concepts, and Applications in Molecular and Condensed Matter Physics With 56 Figures Springer Table of Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Quantal Phase Factors for Adiabatic Changes 5 2.1 Introduction 5 2.2 Adiabatic Approximation 10 2.3 Berry's Adiabatic Phase 14 2.4 Topological Phases and the Aharonov—Bohm Effect 22 Problems 29 3. Spinning Quantum System in an External Magnetic Field 31 3.1 Introduction 31 3.2 The Parameterization of the Basis Vectors 31 3.3 Mead—Berry Connection and Berry Phase for Adiabatic Evolutions Magnetic Monopole Potentials 36 3.4 The Exact Solution of the Schrödinger Equation 42 3.5 Dynamical and Geometrical Phase Factors for Non-Adiabatic Evolution 48 Problems 52 4. Quantal Phases for General Cyclic Evolution 53 4.1 Introduction 53 4.2 Aharonov—Anandan Phase 53 4.3 Exact Cyclic Evolution for Periodic Hamiltonians 60 Problems 64 5. Fiber Bundles and Gauge Theories 65 5.1 Introduction 65 5.2 From Quantal Phases to Fiber Bundles 65 5.3 An Elementary Introduction to Fiber Bundles 67 5.4 Geometry of Principal Bundles and the Concept of Holonomy 76 5.5 Gauge Theories 87 5.6 Mathematical Foundations of Gauge Theories and Geometry of Vector Bundles 95 Problems 102 XII Table of Contents 6. Mathematical Structure of the Geometric Phase I: The Abelian Phase 107 6.1 Introduction 107 6.2 Holonomy Interpretations of the Geometric Phase 107 6.3 Classification of U(1) Principal Bundles and the Relation Between the Berry—Simon and Aharonov—Anandan Interpretations of the Adiabatic Phase 113 6.4 Holonomy Interpretation of the Non-Adiabatic Phase Using a Bundle over the Parameter Space 118 6.5 Spinning Quantum System and Topological Aspects of the Geometric Phase 123 Problems 126 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Geometric Phase from Aharonov-Bohm to Pancharatnam–Berry and Beyond
    Geometric phase from Aharonov-Bohm to Pancharatnam–Berry and beyond Eliahu Cohen1,2,*, Hugo Larocque1, Frédéric Bouchard1, Farshad Nejadsattari1, Yuval Gefen3, Ebrahim Karimi1,* 1Department of Physics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, K1N 6N5, Canada 2Faculty of Engineering and the Institute of Nanotechnology and Advanced Materials, Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan 5290002, Israel 3Department of Condensed Matter Physics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel *Corresponding authors: [email protected], [email protected] Abstract: Whenever a quantum system undergoes a cycle governed by a slow change of parameters, it acquires a phase factor: the geometric phase. Its most common formulations are known as the Aharonov-Bohm, Pancharatnam and Berry phases, but both prior and later manifestations exist. Though traditionally attributed to the foundations of quantum mechanics, the geometric phase has been generalized and became increasingly influential in many areas from condensed-matter physics and optics to high energy and particle physics and from fluid mechanics to gravity and cosmology. Interestingly, the geometric phase also offers unique opportunities for quantum information and computation. In this Review we first introduce the Aharonov-Bohm effect as an important realization of the geometric phase. Then we discuss in detail the broader meaning, consequences and realizations of the geometric phase emphasizing the most important mathematical methods and experimental techniques used in the study of geometric phase, in particular those related to recent works in optics and condensed-matter physics. Published in Nature Reviews Physics 1, 437–449 (2019). DOI: 10.1038/s42254-019-0071-1 1. Introduction A charged quantum particle is moving through space.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bold Ones in the Land of Strange
    PHYSICS OF THE IMPOSSIBLE: The Bold Ones in the Land of Strange By Karol Jałochowski. Translation by Kamila Slawinska. Originally published in POLITYKA 41, 85 (2010) in Polish. A new scientific center has just opened at Singapore’s Science Drive 2: its efforts are focused on revealing nature’s uttermost secrets. The place attracts many young, talented and eccentric physicists, among them some Poles. This summer night is as hot as any other night in the equatorial Singapore (December ones included). Five men, seated at a table in one of the city’s countless bars, are about to finish another pitcher of local beer. They are Artur Ekert, a Polish-born cryptologist and a Research Fellow at Merton College at the University of Oxford (profiled in issue 27 of POLITYKA); Leong Chuan Kwek, a Singapore native; Briton Hugo Cable; Brazilian Marcelo Franca Santos; and Björn Hessmo of Sweden. While enjoying their drinks, they are also trying to find a trace of comprehensive tactics in the chaotic mess of ball-kicking they are watching on a plasma screen above: a soccer game played somewhere halfway across the world. “My father always wanted me to become a soccer player. And I have failed him so miserably,” says Hessmo. His words are met with a nod of understanding. So far, the game has provided the men with no excitement. Their faces finally light up with joy only when the score table is displayed with the results of Round One of the ongoing tournament. Zeros and ones – that’s exciting! All of them are quantum information physicists: zeroes and ones is what they do.
    [Show full text]
  • Status of Quantum Computer Development Entwicklungsstand Quantencomputer Document History
    Status of quantum computer development Entwicklungsstand Quantencomputer Document history Version Date Editor Description 1.0 May 2018 Document status after main phase of project 1.1 July 2019 First update containing both new material and improved readability, details summarized in chapters 1.6 and 2.11 Federal Office for Information Security Post Box 20 03 63 D-53133 Bonn Phone: +49 22899 9582-0 E-Mail: [email protected] Internet: https://www.bsi.bund.de © Federal Office for Information Security 2017 Introduction Introduction This study discusses the current (Fall 2017, update early 2019) state of affairs in the physical implementation of quantum computing as well as algorithms to be run on them, focused on application in cryptanalysis. It is supposed to be an orientation to scientists with a connection to one of the fields involved—mathematicians, computer scientists. These will find the treatment of their own field slightly superficial but benefit from the discussion in the other sections. The executive summary as well as the introduction and conclusions to each chapter provide actionable information to decision makers. The text is separated into multiple parts that are related (but not identical) to previous work packages of this project. Authors Frank K. Wilhelm, Saarland University Rainer Steinwandt, Florida Atlantic University, USA Brandon Langenberg, Florida Atlantic University, USA Per J. Liebermann, Saarland University Anette Messinger, Saarland University Peter K. Schuhmacher, Saarland University Copyright The study including all its parts are copyrighted by the BSI–Federal Office for Information Security. Any use outside the limits defined by the copyright law without approval by the BSI is not permitted and punishable.
    [Show full text]
  • A Recent Encryption Technique for Images Using AES and Quantum Key Distribution
    International Journal of Research in Advent Technology, Vol.7, No.5S, May 2019 E-ISSN: 2321-9637 Available online at www.ijrat.org A Recent Encryption Technique for Images Using AES and Quantum Key Distribution Jeba Nega Cheltha C Assistant Professor, Department of CSE, Jaipur Engineering College & Research Centre Jaipur, India [email protected] Abstract— Data security acts an imperative task while transferring information through internet, whereas, security is awfully vital in the contemporary world. Art of Cryptography endows with an original level of fortification that protects private facts from disclosure to harass. But still, day to day, it’s very arduous to safe the data from intruders. This paper presents regarding thetransferring encrypted images over internet using AES and Quantum Key Distribution method,where Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) algorithm is used for encryption as well as decryption of the picture. AES employs Symmetric key that means both the dispatcher and recipient use the identical key. So the key should be transmitted securely to both the dispatcher and recipient using Quantum key Distribution, whereas, using AES and Quantum Key Distribution the Data would be more secure. Keywords— Encryption, Decryption,AES, Quantum key Distribution 1. INTRODUCTION which is lesser than the size of AES . Also AES is against The most secured just as widely utilized approach to watch Brute Force attack. Hence the proposed work is much the protection and dependability of data communicate secured. depend on symmetric cryptography. Key distribution is the way toward sharing cryptographic keys between at least two 3. PROPOSED WORK gatherings to enable them to safely share data.
    [Show full text]
  • The Quantum Geometric Phase As a Transformation Invariant
    PRAMANA © Printed in India Vol. 49, No. 1, --journal of July 1997 physics pp. 33--40 The quantum geometric phase as a transformation invariant N MUKUNDA* Centre for Theoretical Studies and Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India * Honorary Professor, Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research, Jakkur, Bangalore 560 064, India Abstract. The kinematic approach to the theory of the geometric phase is outlined. This phase is shown to be the simplest invariant under natural groups of transformations on curves in Hilbert space. The connection to the Bargmann invariant is brought out, and the case of group representations described. Keywords. Geometric phase; Bargmann invariant. PACS No. 03.65 1. Introduction Ever since Berry's important work of 1984 [1], the geometric phase in quantum mechanics has been extensively studied by many authors. It was soon realised that there were notable precursors to this work, such as Rytov, Vladimirskii and Pancharatnam [2]. Considerable activity followed in various groups in India too, notably the Raman Research Institute, the Bose Institute, Hyderabad University, Delhi University, the Institute of Mathematical Sciences to name a few. IIn the account to follow, a brief review of Berry's work and its extensions will be given [3]. We then turn to a description of a new approach which seems to succeed in reducing the geometric phase to its bare essentials, and which is currently being applied in various situations [4]. Its main characteristic is that one deals basically only with quantum kinematics. We define certain simple geometrical objects, or configurations of vectors, in the Hilbert space of quantum mechanics, and two natural groups of transformations acting on them.
    [Show full text]
  • Geometry in Quantum Mechanics: Basic Training in Condensed Matter Physics
    Geometry in Quantum Mechanics: Basic Training in Condensed Matter Physics Erich Mueller Lecture Notes: Spring 2014 Preface About Basic Training Basic Training in Condensed Matter physics is a modular team taught course offered by the theorists in the Cornell Physics department. It is designed to expose our graduate students to a broad range of topics. Each module runs 2-4 weeks, and require a range of preparations. This module, \Geometry in Quantum Mechanics," is designed for students who have completed a standard one semester graduate quantum mechanics course. Prior Topics 2006 Random Matrix Theory (Piet Brouwer) Quantized Hall Effect (Chris Henley) Disordered Systems, Computational Complexity, and Information Theory (James Sethna) Asymptotic Methods (Veit Elser) 2007 Superfluidity in Bose and Fermi Systems (Erich Mueller) Applications of Many-Body Theory (Tomas Arias) Rigidity (James Sethna) Asymptotic Analysis for Differential Equations (Veit Elser) 2008 Constrained Problems (Veit Elser) Quantum Optics (Erich Mueller) Quantum Antiferromagnets (Chris Henley) Luttinger Liquids (Piet Brouwer) 2009 Continuum Theories of Crystal Defects (James Sethna) Probes of Cold Atoms (Erich Mueller) Competing Ferroic Orders: the Magnetoelectric Effect (Craig Fennie) Quantum Criticality (Eun-Ah Kim) i 2010 Equation of Motion Approach to Many-Body Physics (Erich Mueller) Dynamics of Infectious Diseases (Chris Myers) The Theory of Density Functional Theory: Electronic, Liquid, and Joint (Tomas Arias) Nonlinear Fits to Data: Sloppiness, Differential Geometry
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Geometric Phases in Quantum Mechanics Y.BEN-ARYEH Physics
    Geometric phases in Quantum Mechanics Y.BEN-ARYEH Physics Department , Technion-Israel Institute of Technology , Haifa 32000, Israel Email: [email protected] Various phenomena related to geometric phases in quantum mechanics are reviewed and explained by analyzing some examples. The concepts of 'parallelisms', 'connections' and 'curvatures' are applied to Aharonov-Bohm (AB) effect, to U(1) phase rotation, to SU (2) phase rotation and to holonomic quantum computation (HQC). The connections in Schrodinger equation are treated by two alternative approaches. Implementation of HQC is demonstrated by the use of 'dark states' including detailed calculations with the connections, for implementing quantum gates. 'Anyons' are related to the symmetries of the wave functions, in a two-dimensional space, and the use of this concept is demonstrated by analyzing an example taken from the field of Quantum Hall effects. 1.Introduction There are various books treating advanced topics of geometric phases [1-3]. The solutions for certain problems in this field remain , however, not always clear. The purpose of the present article is to explain various phemomena related to geometric phases and demonstrate the explanations by analyzing some examples. In a previous Review [4] the use of geometric phases related to U(1) phase rotation [5] has been described. The geometric phases have been related to topological effects [6], and an enormous amount of works has been reviewed, including both theoretical and experimental results. The aim of the present article is to extend the previous treatment [4] so that it will include now more fields , in which concepts of geometric phases are applied.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Adiabatic Theorem and Berry's Phase Factor Page Tyler Department of Physics, Drexel University
    Quantum Adiabatic Theorem and Berry's Phase Factor Page Tyler Department of Physics, Drexel University Abstract A study is presented of Michael Berry's observation of quantum mechanical systems transported along a closed, adiabatic path. In this case, a topological phase factor arises along with the dynamical phase factor predicted by the adiabatic theorem. 1 Introduction In 1984, Michael Berry pointed out a feature of quantum mechanics (known as Berry's Phase) that had been overlooked for 60 years at that time. In retrospect, it seems astonishing that this result escaped notice for so long. It is most likely because our classical preconceptions can often be misleading in quantum mechanics. After all, we are accustomed to thinking that the phases of a wave functions are somewhat arbitrary. Physical quantities will involve Ψ 2 so the phase factors cancel out. It was Berry's insight that if you move the Hamiltonian around a closed, adiabatic loop, the relative phase at the beginning and at the end of the process is not arbitrary, and can be determined. There is a good, classical analogy used to develop the notion of an adiabatic transport that uses something like a Foucault pendulum. Or rather a pendulum whose support is moved about a loop on the surface of the Earth to return it to its exact initial state or one parallel to it. For the process to be adiabatic, the support must move slow and steady along its path and the period of oscillation for the pendulum must be much smaller than that of the Earth's.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 12: Quantum Key Distribution. Secret Key. BB84, E91 and B92 Protocols. Continuous-Variable Protocols. 1. Secret Key. A
    Lecture 12: Quantum key distribution. Secret key. BB84, E91 and B92 protocols. Continuous-variable protocols. 1. Secret key. According to the Vernam theorem, any message (for instance, consisting of binary symbols, 01010101010101), can be encoded in an absolutely secret way if the one uses a secret key of the same length. A key is also a sequence, for instance, 01110001010001. The encoding is done by adding the message and the key modulo 2: 00100100000100. The one who knows the key can decode the encoded message by adding the key to the message modulo 2. The important thing is that the key should be used only once. It is exactly this way that classical cryptography works. Therefore the only task of quantum cryptography is to distribute the secret key between just two users (conventionally called Alice and Bob). This is Quantum Key Distribution (QKD). 2. BB84 protocol, proposed in 1984 by Bennett and Brassard – that’s where the name comes from. The idea is to encode every bit of the secret key into the polarization state of a single photon. Because the polarization state of a single photon cannot be measured without destroying this photon, this information will be ‘fragile’ and not available to the eavesdropper. Any eavesdropper (called Eve) will have to detect the photon, and then she will either reveal herself or will have to re-send this photon. But then she will inevitably send a photon with a wrong polarization state. This will lead to errors, and again the eavesdropper will reveal herself. The protocol then runs as follows.
    [Show full text]
  • Geometric Phases Without Geometry
    Geometric phases without geometry Amar Vutha∗ and David DeMille Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA Geometric phases arise in a number of physical situations and often lead to systematic shifts in frequencies or phases measured in precision experiments. We describe, by working through some simple examples, a method to calculate geometric phases that relies only on standard quantum mechanical calculations of energy level shifts. This connection between geometric phases and off- resonant energy shifts simplifies calculation of the effect in certain situations. More generally, it also provides a way to understand and calculate geometric phases without recourse to topology. PACS numbers: 03.65.Vf, 32.60.+i I. INTRODUCTION A geometric phase, often also referred to as an adiabatic phase or Berry's phase, is a real, physical phase shift that can lead to measurable effects in experiments ([1, 2, 3] are some examples). In the classic version of this effect, the state of a particle with a magnetic moment is modified under the influence of a magnetic field which undergoes a slow change in its direction. The motion of the field leads to a phase shift accumulated between the quantum states of the particle, in addition to the dynamical phase due to the Larmor precession of the magnetic moment around the magnetic field. This extra phase is termed a geometric phase because it has a simple interpretation in terms of the geometry traced out by the system's Hamiltonian as it evolves in its parameter space. We point the interested reader to [4] and references within for an excellent account of the geometric approach to calculating geometric phases, and its various connections with the topology of the parameter space.
    [Show full text]