AN ACT Relating to Speed Limits. 1 Be It Enacted by The
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Kentucky Oversize/ Overweight Permit Manual
Oversize/ Overweight Permit Manual Kentucky Foreword The Specialized Carriers & Rigging Association is pleased to publish this Oversize/ Overweight Permit Manual. Each state analysis includes information in a standardized format: contact, legal limits, special permit limits, general restrictions, types of permits available, fees, escort needs, fines, and restricted travel areas. Telephone numbers, locations, and hours of operation are listed for ports of entry and permit branches. However, readers are always advised to check with the state offices on current laws and procedures. This project could not have been completed without the advice and consultation of many state officials. We thank all of those who provided permit manuals, maps, laws, regulations, and various other forms of documentation. Legal Notice This SC&RA Oversize/Overweight Permit Manual is intended only to provide concise, easily read information, useful in planning movements of overdimensional and overweight loads. This Permit Manual is not intended to be an accurate summary of all the applicable laws and regulations. Users of the Permit Manual should confirm the information contained herein before dispatching vehicles and loads. The SC&RA cautions Permit Manual users that state laws and regulations are subject to change without notice, and that some time elapses between the effective date of such changes and the amendment of the Permit Manual to reflect those changes. The SC&RA assumes no responsibility for accident, injury, loss or claim, penalties or any other damage resulting from reliance on the contents of this Permit Manual. Specialized Carriers & Copyright 1987-2015 by the Specialized Carriers & Rigging Association. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may Rigging Association be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any 5870 Trinity Parkway, Suite 200 form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, Centreville, VA 20120 recording, scanning, or otherwise, without the prior written PHONE: (703) 698-0291 permission of the publisher, Joel M. -
Divide and Dissent: Kentucky Politics, 1930-1963
University of Kentucky UKnowledge Political History History 1987 Divide and Dissent: Kentucky Politics, 1930-1963 John Ed Pearce Click here to let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Thanks to the University of Kentucky Libraries and the University Press of Kentucky, this book is freely available to current faculty, students, and staff at the University of Kentucky. Find other University of Kentucky Books at uknowledge.uky.edu/upk. For more information, please contact UKnowledge at [email protected]. Recommended Citation Pearce, John Ed, "Divide and Dissent: Kentucky Politics, 1930-1963" (1987). Political History. 3. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/upk_political_history/3 Divide and Dissent This page intentionally left blank DIVIDE AND DISSENT KENTUCKY POLITICS 1930-1963 JOHN ED PEARCE THE UNIVERSITY PRESS OF KENTUCKY Publication of this volume was made possible in part by a grant from the National Endowment for the Humanities. Copyright © 1987 by The University Press of Kentucky Paperback edition 2006 The University Press of Kentucky Scholarly publisher for the Commonwealth, serving Bellarmine University, Berea College, Centre College of Kentucky, Eastern Kentucky University, The Filson Historical Society, Georgetown College, Kentucky Historical Society, Kentucky State University, Morehead State University, Murray State University, Northern Kentucky University,Transylvania University, University of Kentucky, University of Louisville, and Western Kentucky University. All rights reserved. Editorial and Sales Qffices: The University Press of Kentucky 663 South Limestone Street, Lexington, Kentucky 40508-4008 www.kentuckypress.com Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Pearce,John Ed. Divide and dissent. Bibliography: p. Includes index. 1. Kentucky-Politics and government-1865-1950. -
I-69 Ohio River Crossing DEIS, Chapter 2 Purpose and Need
I-69 Ohio River Crossing Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement CHAPTER 2 – PURPOSE AND NEED This chapter describes the need for the project based on I-69 system linkage, maintenance costs of the existing US 41 bridges, existing and future traffic levels of service (LOS), and crash rates. It then presents the project purpose based on the project needs and the performance measures that will be used to evaluate project alternatives. 2.1 INTRODUCTION The project’s purpose and need statement sets the foundation for the project development process. The statement identifies specific transportation problems (needs) that the project will address and describes the desired outcomes or goals (purpose) of the project. The purpose and need statement that was developed for the 2004 Interstate 69 Henderson, Kentucky to Evansville, Indiana Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) was reviewed and revised accordingly based on updated information, policies, and guidelines. The project area used in the evaluation of the purpose and need for the I-69 Ohio River Crossing (ORX) project extends from I-69 (formerly I-164) in Indiana on the south side of Evansville (i.e., northern terminus) across the Ohio River to I-69 (formerly Edward T. Breathitt Pennyrile Parkway) southeast of Henderson, KY (i.e., southern terminus) (Figure 2.2-1). The section of Edward T. Breathitt Pennyrile Parkway between KY 351 and KY 425 that was not re-designated as I-69 has been recently re-designated as US 41. The project area generally encompasses a triangular area that extends from approximately 0.5 mile west of the I-69/US 41/Veterans Memorial Parkway interchange to 0.5 mile east of the I-69/SR 662 interchange in Indiana, and south into Kentucky to I-69 near KY 136. -
A CONCURRENT RESOLUTION Urging the United States Government to 2 Designate a Portion of the Edward T
UNOFFICIAL COPY 17 RS BR 1556 1 A CONCURRENT RESOLUTION urging the United States government to 2 designate a portion of the Edward T. Breathitt Pennyrile Parkway as Interstate 169. 3 WHEREAS, the Edward T. Breathitt Pennyrile Parkway opened as a toll road on 4 Kentucky's Parkway system in 1969, providing a fast and efficient connection between 5 the cities of Henderson and Hopkinsville; and 6 WHEREAS, in 2006, the section of the Edward T. Breathitt Pennyrile Parkway 7 from Henderson to the Western Kentucky Parkway was designated as a portion of 8 Interstate 69, and in 2015, legislation directed that the route be signed as Interstate 69; 9 and 10 WHEREAS, designating the remainder of the Edward T. Breathitt Pennyrile 11 Parkway as an interstate spur would provide increased connectivity between Interstate 69 12 and Interstate 24; and 13 WHEREAS, designation of the remainder of the Edward T. Breathitt Pennyrile 14 Parkway as an interstate spur could save the federal government and the Commonwealth 15 nearly $200 million and maximize investments already made, like the $100 million 16 invested in the road in the 1990s to achieve this ultimate goal ; and 17 WHEREAS, designation of the remainder of the Edward T. Breathitt Pennyrile 18 Parkway as an interstate spur will enhance the region by helping to bring in much needed 19 economic and tourism dollars, especially since so many businesses emphasize connection 20 to the interstate highway system when researching site selection; and 21 WHEREAS, designation of the remainder of the Edward T. Breathitt -
Chapter 180 1
CHAPTER 180 1 CHAPTER 180 ( HCR 90 ) A CONCURRENT RESOLUTION urging the United States government to designate a portion of the Edward T. Breathitt Pennyrile Parkway as Interstate 169. WHEREAS, the Edward T. Breathitt Pennyrile Parkway opened as a toll road on Kentucky's Parkway system in 1969, providing a fast and efficient connection between the cities of Henderson and Hopkinsville; and WHEREAS, in 2006, the section of the Edward T. Breathitt Pennyrile Parkway from Henderson to the Western Kentucky Parkway was designated as a portion of Interstate 69, and in 2015, legislation directed that the route be signed as Interstate 69; and WHEREAS, designating the remainder of the Edward T. Breathitt Pennyrile Parkway as an interstate spur would provide increased connectivity between Interstate 69 and Interstate 24; and WHEREAS, designation of the remainder of the Edward T. Breathitt Pennyrile Parkway as an interstate spur could save the federal government and the Commonwealth nearly $200 million and maximize investments already made, like the $100 million invested in the road in the 1990s to achieve this ultimate goal ; and WHEREAS, designation of the remainder of the Edward T. Breathitt Pennyrile Parkway as an interstate spur will enhance the region by helping to bring in much needed economic and tourism dollars, especially since so many businesses emphasize connection to the interstate highway system when researching site selection; and WHEREAS, designation of the remainder of the Edward T. Breathitt Pennyrile Parkway as an interstate spur would continue to improve the vital role that the interstate highway system plays in our national defense logistics system especially as it pertains to Fort Campbell; and WHEREAS, current projects in Kentucky's Six Year Road Plan address intersection issues that pose potential obstacles to an interstate designation; and WHEREAS, legislation has passed the United States Senate that would designate the remainder of the Edward T. -
Breckinridge County Industrial Reports for Kentucky Counties
Western Kentucky University TopSCHOLAR® Breckinridge County Industrial Reports for Kentucky Counties 6-1998 Industrial Resources: Breckinridge County Kentucky Library Research Collections Western Kentucky University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/breckinridge_cty Part of the Business Administration, Management, and Operations Commons, Growth and Development Commons, and the Infrastructure Commons Recommended Citation Kentucky Library Research Collections, "Industrial Resources: Breckinridge County" (1998). Breckinridge County. Paper 1. https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/breckinridge_cty/1 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by TopSCHOLAR®. It has been accepted for inclusion in Breckinridge County by an authorized administrator of TopSCHOLAR®. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Ml Kentucky Resources For Economic Development Breckinridge County June 1998 "S'C • bOC—-?-' '4 S'. c:'.v inc; G'OQfi • Boyc' u B'acke'r"; County • 9fano-"-nDur:f • Brecki'v ■ BfOW!i3V!lle ■ Bulliil County » BjrkisB.-ilit- • C. Can-pc-T' S'jiile • Cainproii • Curttsie • Ctiri'sln C:'un?v Carrolltofi • Cova Citv ♦ Clinton • Columbia • Ccrbi-^ • Cyi"': ■Tiara Danville • Da-.vson Spr'ngs • Ed'-ncntcn • El zabf?thto vn • Es"- County Eillott County • & Bulier • Fleming5b;.rq • F-;;rk'cr; - =M' 2 ^ k 1 i n FrancFbu-g • Fulton County • Galiann Count/ • Gecrgetovvn • CnnnT County • G;. - sburg Grayscn 5* Onve Hili • Glasgow • Hancock CO'...n-v • Hanan Ccunt-v • H-onoO>Pj;-j • H ; Couni'y Hazard • Henderson • Henry County ■ Hoclrj :-:--. Me • Hopk^nsvlMe-Cn" n-. a : Ccu'v" • : : 1* son C o. acKson • Knots County • LaGrange S e:_:k;- r- • Lan;aster • Lawre- mcdu'-;; • Cornrcr; • Grayscn County • Le:cher County • Lercngtoj • _.':TrU;-Carrev Cu;. -
(A) Placement Above Uppermost Aquifer
AECOM 502-569-2301 tel 500 W Jefferson St. 502-569-2304 fax Suite 1600 Louisville, KY 40202 www.aecom.com October 17, 2018 Big Rivers Electric Corporation Sebree Generating Station 9000 Highway 2096 Robards, Kentucky 42452 Engineer’s Certification of Placement Above the Uppermost Aquifer Existing Green CCR Surface Impoundment EPA Final CCR Rule Sebree Station Robards, Kentucky 1.0 PURPOSE The purpose of this document is to certify that the Placement above Sebree “Green” Existing CCR Surface Impoundment is in compliance with the Placement above the Uppermost Aquifer requirement of the Final CCR Rule at 40 CFR §257.60. Presented below is the project background, summary of findings, limitations and certification. 2.0 BACKGROUND In accordance with 40 CFR §257.60, the owner/operator of an existing CCR Surface Impoundment must demonstrate that the base of the unit is located no less than 1.52 meters (five feet) above the upper limit of the uppermost aquifer, or must demonstrate that there will not be an intermittent, recurring, or sustained hydraulic connection between any portion of the base of the CCR unit and the uppermost aquifer due to normal fluctuations in groundwater elevations (including the seasonal high water table). In accordance with 40 CFR §257.60(c)(1), the demonstration must be made by October 17, 2018. If such demonstration cannot be made, the unit is subject to the closure or retrofit requirements of 40 CFR §257.101 3.0 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Available data regarding site groundwater, site geology, and physical limits of the unit for the Green Surface Impoundment do not evidence a 5-foot separation between the base of the impoundment and the uppermost limit of the uppermost aquifer and they do not support a lack of hydraulic connectivity between the unit and the aquifer as specified in 40 CFR §257.60(a). -
I-69 Ohio River Crossing DEIS, Appendix H-1 Farmland Coordination
I-69 Ohio River Crossing Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement APPENDIX H-1 Farmland Coordination Page Indiana Letter February 20, 2018 ................................................................................. 1 Form NRCS‐CPA‐106 Indiana ................................................................................... 10 Kentucky Letter February 20, 2018 ........................................................................... 20 Form NRCS‐CPA Kentucky ....................................................................................... 22 NRCS Response March 19, 2018 ................................................................................ 48 Form NRCS‐CPA‐106 Indiana April 4, 2018 ............................................................ 54 Form NRCS‐CPA‐106 Kentucky March 19, 2018 .................................................... 55 Clarification Note for Central Alternative 1: Central Alternatives 1A and 1B as described in the DEIS are physically the same alternative. The only difference between them is that Central Alternative 1A would include tolls on both the new I-69 bridge and on the US 41 bridge. Central Alternative 1B would only include tolls on the new I-69 bridge. Any reference in this document to Central Alternative 1 applies to both Central Alternative 1A and Central Alternative 1B. Appendices OHIO RIVER CROSSING 16SDHIDRIVERCR0SSING.CDM February 20, 2018 Ms. Jane Hardisty State Conservationist Natural Resources Conservation Service - Indiana US Department of Agriculture 6013 Lakeside Boulevard -
Breckinridge County Industrial Reports for Kentucky Counties
Western Kentucky University TopSCHOLAR® Breckinridge County Industrial Reports for Kentucky Counties 1992 Industrial Resources: Breckinridge County Kentucky Library Research Collections Western Kentucky University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/breckinridge_cty Part of the Business Administration, Management, and Operations Commons, Growth and Development Commons, and the Infrastructure Commons Recommended Citation Kentucky Library Research Collections, "Industrial Resources: Breckinridge County" (1992). Breckinridge County. Paper 3. https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/breckinridge_cty/3 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by TopSCHOLAR®. It has been accepted for inclusion in Breckinridge County by an authorized administrator of TopSCHOLAR®. For more information, please contact [email protected]. icD Breckinridge County KENTUCKY RESOURCES FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BRECKINRIDGE COUNTY, KENTUCKY Prepared by The Kentucky Cabinet for Economic Development Division of Research and Planning in cooperation with Breckinridge County Development Corporation 1992 Division Director - Pamela K. Riley; program manager - Keith Roberts; research - Richard H. Cobb; clerical - Wanda Sharp; graphics - Robert Owens, Pat Coleman; cartography - Edwin Scott, Dave Clark. Cost of printing paid from state funds. TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page BRECKINRIDGE COUNTY, KENTUCKY - A RESOURCE PROFILE 1 THE LABOR MARKET STATISTICS 2 Labor Market Area Map 2 Population 3 Population Projections 3 Estimated Labor -
KY's Major Highways & Cities
Kentucky's Major Highways Cabiinett fforr Economiic Devellopmentt !( Major Kentucky Cities Audubon Parkway Martha Layne Collins Bluegrass Parkway Ohio Hal Rogers Parkway Edward T. Breathitt Pennyrile Parkway Louie B. Nunn Cumberland Parkway Bert T. Combs Mountain Parkway Indiana Julian M. Carroll Purchase Parkway 275 ¨¦§471 Wendell H. Ford Western Kentucky Parkway ¨¦§ Florence !(Kenton Boone Campbell William N. Natcher PaIrkllwinayois Interstate ¨¦§71 Parkway Gallatin Bracken Pendleton US Highway Carroll Grant Trimble Mason State Road Lewis Greenup Ashland Owen Robertson !( Henry Harrison Boyd Oldham Fleming Carter Louisville Scott Nicholas West !( Shelby Frankfort 264 Bourbon ¨¦§265 !( Bath 64 Rowan Virginia Jefferson ¨¦§ Franklin ¨¦§ Elliott Fayette Lawrence Woodford Spencer Anderson !( Bullitt Lexington Clark Menifee Henderson Hancock Meade Montgomery Morgan Jessamine Johnson !( Owensboro Nelson Powell Martin Henderson Mercer !( Breckinridge Elizabethtown !( Richmond Wolfe Magoffin Daviess !( Union Washington Madison Estill Hardin Boyle Garrard Lee Floyd Pikeville Webster McLean Larue Marion 75 Breathitt !( Pike Ohio Grayson Lincoln ¨¦§ Jackson Owsley Crittenden Rockcastle Knott 65 Taylor Livingston Hopkins ¨¦§ Casey Perry Muhlenberg Hart Green 69 Butler Edmonson Paducah Caldwell ¨¦§ Clay Letcher !( Bowling Somerset Laurel Ballard Adair !( Pulaski Leslie McCracken Green Lyon !( Russell Virginia Missouri Hopkinsville Barren Metcalfe Marshall 24 Warren Knox Harlan Carlisle ¨¦§ !( Logan Trigg Christian Todd Wayne Graves Allen Cumberland Whitley Bell Hickman Simpson Monroe McCreary Clinton Middlesboro Fulton Calloway !( Fulton !( Tennessee North µ Carolina Kentucky Cabinet for Economic Development - Old Capitol Annex - 300 West Broadway - Frankfort, KY 40601 - 502-564-7140 (local) - 800-626-2930 (toll free) - www.thinkkentucky.com. -
Economic Impact Study Heartland Parkway
Economic Impact Study Performed for Heartland Parkway December 2003 Heartland Parkway Economic Impact Analysis Younger Associates has projected the annual economic impact of the Heartland Parkway when the route is completed from the Louie B. Nunn Cumberland Parkway to the Bluegrass Parkway. When the Heartland Parkway is completed, the regional economic impact from increased business output and retail sales is projected to be $2.28 billion annually. A total of 2,596 jobs are projected to be created as a result of this increased activity. To determine the magnitude of the potential economic impact of the Heartland Parkway, key indicators were compared between the economies of rural counties with parkway access and rural counties without parkway access. The counties selected are not part of a Metropolitan Statistical Area, nor are the counties to be served by the Heartland Parkway. For the comparison, a group of seven counties without parkway access were selected: Ballard, Breathitt, Carlisle, Lewis, Owen, Owsley, and Robertson. Another group of seven counties with parkway access was selected: Barren, Clay, Graves, Grayson, Ohio, Webster and Wolfe. Obviously, a vast number of physical, historical, and demographic factors influence the level of economic activity within any individual county or region. However, there is a clear variation in the level of economic activity among the group of randomly selected non-parkway counties and the group of parkway-served counties. The area to be served by the Heartland Parkway has a potential for economic expansion that is at least equal to, or possibly greater than, the increased rate of economic activity seen in rural counties with parkway access when compared to rural counties without parkway access. -
City of Morgantown Comprehensive Plan
CITY OF MORGANTOWN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Respecting Our Past—Stepping Into the Future February 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................8 Historical Background ............................................................................................................................... 8 What is a Comprehensive Plan? ............................................................................................................... 8 Purpose of the Comprehensive Plan......................................................................................................... 9 Functions of the Comprehensive Plan ...................................................................................................... 9 Public Involvement ................................................................................................................................. 10 CHAPTER 2: KRS STATUTES & GOALS/OBJECTIVES ......................................................................... 12 Comprehensive Plan Requirements ........................................................................................................ 12 KRS 100.183 - Comprehensive Plan Required ..................................................................................... 12 KRS 100.187 - Contents of Comprehensive Plan ................................................................................ 12 KRS 100.191 - Research Requirements for Comprehensive Plan ......................................................