Human-Wildlife Interactions, Nature-Based Tourism, and Protected Areas Management: the Case of Mole National Park and the Adjacent Communities in Ghana

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Human-Wildlife Interactions, Nature-Based Tourism, and Protected Areas Management: the Case of Mole National Park and the Adjacent Communities in Ghana HUMAN-WILDLIFE INTERACTIONS, NATURE-BASED TOURISM, AND PROTECTED AREAS MANAGEMENT: THE CASE OF MOLE NATIONAL PARK AND THE ADJACENT COMMUNITIES IN GHANA By EMMANUEL ACQUAH B.Sc., University of Cape Coast, 1997 M.Sc., Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, 2006 A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in the Department of Geography Emmanuel Acquah, 2013 University of Victoria All rights reserved. This dissertation may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without the permission of the author. ii Supervisory Committee HUMAN-WILDLIFE INTERACTIONS, NATURE-BASED TOURISM AND PROTECTED AREAS MANAGEMENT: THE CASE OF MOLE NATIONAL PARK AND THE ADJACENT COMMUNITIES IN GHANA by EMMANUEL ACQUAH B.Sc., University of Cape Coast, 1997 M.Sc., Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, 2006 Supervisory Committee Dr. Philip Dearden, (Department of Geography) Supervisor Dr. Rick B. Rollins, (Department of Geography) Departmental Member Dr. Ann B. Stahl, (Department of Anthropology) Outside Member iii Abstract Supervisory Committee Dr. Philip Dearden, (Department of Geography) Supervisor Dr. Rick B. Rollins, (Department of Geography) Departmental Member Dr. Ann B. Stahl, (Department of Anthropology) Outside Member Protected areas are increasingly becoming islands of habitat surrounded by seas of cultivation and development. Mole National Park, Ghana’s premier park, has an emerging nature-based tourism that is not large when compared to park tourism in other African countries. The park attracts many tourists seeking to observe charismatic wildlife such as elephants. However, many of the species that are attractive to tourists can create problems for adjacent communities. The overarching focus of this study was on how human-wildlife interactions impact on nature-based tourism in order to inform tourism development in Mole National Park and in nearby communities. The study was designed to address the following research questions: (1) How do human-wildlife interactions impact on nature-based tourism in Mole National Park and in nearby communities? (2) How do adjacent communities perceive the concerns and benefits of living near Mole National Park, and what factors explain the differences in perception of these concerns and benefits? and (3) How do park-adjacent communities perceive wildlife impact, and how are the perceptions of wildlife shaped by culture, involvement in a community conservation area, and a community’s distance from the park? A variety of research instruments such as key informant interviews, focus groups, field observations, and surveys were used to gather data from tourists and the diverse range of communities that surround Mole National Park. The study revealed high levels of tourist satisfaction with fundamental attractions such as wildlife and the environment. However, managerial deficiencies were noted in terms of infrastructure and services. CREMA (a variant of community-based natural iv resource management) influence communities to have positive attitude towards the park and tolerate wildlife because of the benefits they gain or perceive they will potentially gain. Communities closer to the park although have concerns, rated benefits higher than communities farther away from the park. Cultural valuation of animals also influence people’s interactions with wildlife. For example, taboo and totemic animals are revered and tolerated, not killed or eaten, although the same species may be considered problematic in other communities. Park ranger patrols, protecting water bodies, and livestock pens were rated as effective enhancement and mitigation measures of human- wildlife interactions. Properly developed nature-based tourism in and around PAs can serve both conservation and development outcomes. However, the success of PAs as a conservation strategy depends to some extent on the support of the nearby communities. Park-adjacent communities’ valuation of wildlife and the perception of concerns and benefits are important in the conservation process. Therefore, efforts should be made to ensure that concerns do not outweigh the benefits of living near PAs. Also tourism development in PAs should benefit nearby communities to offset the negative impacts of PAs on adjacent communities. v Table of Contents Supervisory Committee ................................................................................................ ii Abstract ........................................................................................................................... iii Table of Contents ........................................................................................................... v List of Tables ................................................................................................................. vii Acknowledgments ......................................................................................................... x Chapter 1: Introduction ................................................................................................ 1 1.0 Introduction........................................................................................................... 1 1.1. Research Problem .............................................................................................. 9 1.2. Research Questions ........................................................................................ 10 1.3. Theoretical Approach ...................................................................................... 10 1.4. Conceptual Framework of the Research ................................................... 11 1.5. The Study Area ................................................................................................. 12 1.6. Methods .............................................................................................................. 15 1.7. Thesis Structure ............................................................................................... 16 Chapter 2: Human-Wildlife Interactions and Nature-Based Tourism in Mole National Park, Ghana .................................................................................................. 18 2.0 Abstract ................................................................................................................ 18 2.1 Introduction......................................................................................................... 19 2.2 The Study Area................................................................................................... 22 2.3 Methods ............................................................................................................... 25 2.3.1 Key informants ........................................................................................... 26 2.3.2 Focus groups .............................................................................................. 26 2.3.3 Field observations ..................................................................................... 26 2.3.4 Tourists survey ........................................................................................... 26 2.3.5 Adjacent community survey ................................................................... 27 2.4 Results and Discussion ................................................................................... 29 2.4.1 Tourist motivations for visiting Mole National Park ......................... 29 2.4.2 Perceived wildlife impacts on tourists and adjacent communities ................................................................................................................................... 31 2.4.3 Tourist experiences in Mole National Park ......................................... 34 2.4.4 Guided tour and tourist experience ...................................................... 38 2.4.5 Tourist response to experiences in Mole National Park ................. 42 2.4.6 Number of times visited Mole National Park ...................................... 44 2.4.7 Age groups of tourists visiting Mole National Park .......................... 45 2.4.8 Sources of information about Mole National Park ............................ 46 2.4.9 Adjacent communities’ ideas for tourism activity expansion. ...... 47 2.4 Conclusions and Recommendations ........................................................... 49 Chapter 3: Concerns and Benefits of Park-Adjacent Communities in Northern Ghana ............................................................................................................ 52 3.0 Abstract ................................................................................................................ 52 3.2 The Study Area................................................................................................... 57 3.3 Methods ............................................................................................................... 60 3.3.1 Key informants ........................................................................................... 60 3.3.2 Focus groups .............................................................................................. 60 vi 3.3.3 Field observations ..................................................................................... 61 3.3.4 Household surveys .................................................................................... 61 3. 4 Results and Discussions ..............................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Species Composition and Diversity of Insects of the Kogyae Strict Nature Reserve in Ghana
    Open Journal of Ecology, 2014, 4, 1061-1079 Published Online December 2014 in SciRes. http://www.scirp.org/journal/oje http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oje.2014.417087 Species Composition and Diversity of Insects of the Kogyae Strict Nature Reserve in Ghana Rosina Kyerematen1,2*, Erasmus Henaku Owusu1, Daniel Acquah-Lamptey1, Roger Sigismund Anderson2, Yaa Ntiamoa-Baidu1,3 1Department of Animal Biology and Conservation Science, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana 2African Regional Postgraduate Programme in Insect Science, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana 3Centre for African Wetlands, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana Email: *[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Received 6 September 2014; revised 9 November 2014; accepted 21 November 2014 Copyright © 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Abstract Kogyae Strict Nature Reserve, the only one in Ghana, was established to promote scientific re- search, particularly on how nature revitalizes itself after major disasters, and also to check the southward drift of the savannah grassland. This study presents the first comprehensive inventory of species composition and diversity of insects of the Reserve. Insects were surveyed between September 2011 and June 2012 to capture the end of the rainy season, the dry season and the peak of the wet season. Samples were taken from two sites within the Reserve, Dagomba and Oku using various sampling techniques including pitfall traps, malaise traps and sweep nets. Insect com- munities were characterized in terms of, 1) species richness estimators, 2) species richness, 3) Shannon-Weiner Index of Diversity, 4) Pielou’s evenness and 5) Bray-Curtis similarity.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Relationships and Historical Biogeography of Tribes and Genera in the Subfamily Nymphalinae (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae)
    Blackwell Science, LtdOxford, UKBIJBiological Journal of the Linnean Society 0024-4066The Linnean Society of London, 2005? 2005 862 227251 Original Article PHYLOGENY OF NYMPHALINAE N. WAHLBERG ET AL Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2005, 86, 227–251. With 5 figures . Phylogenetic relationships and historical biogeography of tribes and genera in the subfamily Nymphalinae (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) NIKLAS WAHLBERG1*, ANDREW V. Z. BROWER2 and SÖREN NYLIN1 1Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, S-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden 2Department of Zoology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331–2907, USA Received 10 January 2004; accepted for publication 12 November 2004 We infer for the first time the phylogenetic relationships of genera and tribes in the ecologically and evolutionarily well-studied subfamily Nymphalinae using DNA sequence data from three genes: 1450 bp of cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) (in the mitochondrial genome), 1077 bp of elongation factor 1-alpha (EF1-a) and 400–403 bp of wing- less (both in the nuclear genome). We explore the influence of each gene region on the support given to each node of the most parsimonious tree derived from a combined analysis of all three genes using Partitioned Bremer Support. We also explore the influence of assuming equal weights for all characters in the combined analysis by investigating the stability of clades to different transition/transversion weighting schemes. We find many strongly supported and stable clades in the Nymphalinae. We are also able to identify ‘rogue’
    [Show full text]
  • 149 Genus Ypthimomorpha Van
    AFROTROPICAL BUTTERFLIES 17th edition (2018). MARK C. WILLIAMS. http://www.lepsocafrica.org/?p=publications&s=atb Genus Ypthimomorpha van Son, 1955 Transvaal Museum Memoirs No. 8: 158 (1-166). Type-species: Ypthima itonia Hewitson, by original designation. The genus Ypthimomorpha belongs to the Family Nymphalidae Rafinesque, 1815; Subfamily Satyrinae Boisduval, 1833; Tribe Satyrini Boisduval, 1833; Subtribe Ypthimina, Reuter, 1896. The other genera in the Subtribe Ypthimina in the Afrotropical Region are Ypthima, Mashuna, Mashunoides, Strabena, Neocoenyra, Coenyropsis, Coenyra, Physcaeneura, Neita, Melampius, Cassionympha, Pseudonympha, Paternympha and Stygionympha. Ypthimomorpha (Marsh Ringlet) is an Afrotropical genus containing a single species. Closely related to the genus Ypthima. Several of the species of Ypthima from Asia have genitalia like those of Ypthimomorpha and more properly belong in this genus (Kielland, 1990d: 86). Emmel & Sourakov propose that Ypthimomorpha should be treated as a subgenus of Ypthima, a view with which Larsen (2005a) does not concur. *Ypthimomorpha itonia (Hewitson, 1865) Marsh Ringlet Ypthima itonia Hewitson, 1865. Transactions of the Entomological Society of London (3) 2: 287 (281-294). Ypthimomorpha itonia (Hewitson, 1865). Van Son, 1955. Ypthimomorpha itonia (Hewitson, 1865). Dickson & Kroon, 1978. Ypthimomorpha itonia (Hewitson, 1865). Pringle et al., 1994: 72. Ypthimomorpha itonia. Male (Wingspan 31 mm). Left – upperside; right – underside. Victoria Falls, Zimbabwe. 17 June 2006. J. Dobson. Images M.C. Williams ex Dobson Collection. 1 Ypthimomorpha itonia. Female. Left – upperside; right – underside. Pungwe, Zimbabwe. 16 April 1995. Images M.C. Williams ex J. Greyling Collection. ?Ypthimomorpha itonia. Male (?wet season form). Left – upperside; right – underside. Dzangha-Ndoki, Congo Republic. J. O’Dell. Images M.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish, Various Invertebrates
    Zambezi Basin Wetlands Volume II : Chapters 7 - 11 - Contents i Back to links page CONTENTS VOLUME II Technical Reviews Page CHAPTER 7 : FRESHWATER FISHES .............................. 393 7.1 Introduction .................................................................... 393 7.2 The origin and zoogeography of Zambezian fishes ....... 393 7.3 Ichthyological regions of the Zambezi .......................... 404 7.4 Threats to biodiversity ................................................... 416 7.5 Wetlands of special interest .......................................... 432 7.6 Conservation and future directions ............................... 440 7.7 References ..................................................................... 443 TABLE 7.2: The fishes of the Zambezi River system .............. 449 APPENDIX 7.1 : Zambezi Delta Survey .................................. 461 CHAPTER 8 : FRESHWATER MOLLUSCS ................... 487 8.1 Introduction ................................................................. 487 8.2 Literature review ......................................................... 488 8.3 The Zambezi River basin ............................................ 489 8.4 The Molluscan fauna .................................................. 491 8.5 Biogeography ............................................................... 508 8.6 Biomphalaria, Bulinis and Schistosomiasis ................ 515 8.7 Conservation ................................................................ 516 8.8 Further investigations .................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Integrative Analyses Unveil Speciation Linked to Host Plant Shift in Spialia Butterflies
    Molecular Ecology (2016) doi: 10.1111/mec.13756 Integrative analyses unveil speciation linked to host plant shift in Spialia butterflies JUAN L. HERNANDEZ-ROLDAN,*† 1 LEONARDO DAPPORTO,*‡ 1 VLAD DINCA,*§ JUAN C. VICENTE,¶ EMILY A. HORNETT,** JINDRA SICHOVA,†† VLADIMIR A. LUKHTANOV,‡‡§§ GERARD TALAVERA*¶¶ and ROGER VILA* *Institut de Biologia Evolutiva (CSIC-Universitat Pompeu Fabra), Passeig Marıtim de la Barceloneta 37, E-08003 Barcelona, Spain, †Departamento de Biologıa (Zoologıa), Facultad de Ciencias de la Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, C/ Darwin 2, E-28049 Madrid, Spain, ‡Department of Biology, University of Florence, Via Madonna del Piano 6, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino, FI, Italy, §Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1, ¶C/ Witerico, 9A – Bajo B, E-28025 Madrid, Spain, **Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK, ††Institute of Entomology, Biology Centre ASCR, 370 05 Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic, ‡‡Department of Karyosystematics, Zoological Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya nab. 1, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia, §§Department of Entomology, St. Petersburg State University, Universitetskaya nab. 7/9, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia, ¶¶Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology and Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA Abstract Discovering cryptic species in well-studied areas and taxonomic groups can have pro- found implications in understanding eco-evolutionary processes and in nature conser- vation because such groups often involve research models and act as flagship taxa for nature management. In this study, we use an array of techniques to study the butter- flies in the Spialia sertorius species group (Lepidoptera, Hesperiidae). The integration of genetic, chemical, cytogenetic, morphological, ecological and microbiological data indicates that the sertorius species complex includes at least five species that differen- tiated during the last three million years.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Family of Diverse Skin Peptides from the Microhylid Frog Genus Phrynomantis
    molecules Article A New Family of Diverse Skin Peptides from the Microhylid Frog Genus Phrynomantis Constantijn Raaymakers 1,2, Benoit Stijlemans 3,4, Charlotte Martin 5, Shabnam Zaman 1 , Steven Ballet 5, An Martel 2, Frank Pasmans 2 and Kim Roelants 1,* 1 Amphibian Evolution Lab, Biology Department, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Elsene, Belgium; [email protected] (C.R.); [email protected] (S.Z.) 2 Wildlife Health Ghent, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium; [email protected] (A.M.); [email protected] (F.P.) 3 Unit of Cellular and Molecular Immunology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Elsene, Belgium; [email protected] 4 Myeloid Cell Immunology Lab, VIB Centre for Inflammation Research, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Elsene, Belgium 5 Research Group of Organic Chemistry, Department of Chemistry and Department of Bio-engineering Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Elsene, Belgium; [email protected] (C.M.); [email protected] (S.B.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +32-26293410 Received: 17 January 2020; Accepted: 18 February 2020; Published: 18 February 2020 Abstract: A wide range of frogs produce skin poisons composed of bioactive peptides for defence against pathogens, parasites and predators. While several frog families have been thoroughly screened for skin-secreted peptides, others, like the Microhylidae, have remained mostly unexplored. Previous studies of microhylids found no evidence of peptide secretion, suggesting that this defence adaptation was evolutionarily lost. We conducted transcriptome analyses of the skins of Phrynomantis bifasciatus and Phrynomantis microps, two African microhylid species long suspected to be poisonous.
    [Show full text]
  • Check-List of the Butterflies of the Kakamega Forest Nature Reserve in Western Kenya (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea, Papilionoidea)
    Nachr. entomol. Ver. Apollo, N. F. 25 (4): 161–174 (2004) 161 Check-list of the butterflies of the Kakamega Forest Nature Reserve in western Kenya (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea, Papilionoidea) Lars Kühne, Steve C. Collins and Wanja Kinuthia1 Lars Kühne, Museum für Naturkunde der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Invalidenstraße 43, D-10115 Berlin, Germany; email: [email protected] Steve C. Collins, African Butterfly Research Institute, P.O. Box 14308, Nairobi, Kenya Dr. Wanja Kinuthia, Department of Invertebrate Zoology, National Museums of Kenya, P.O. Box 40658, Nairobi, Kenya Abstract: All species of butterflies recorded from the Kaka- list it was clear that thorough investigation of scientific mega Forest N.R. in western Kenya are listed for the first collections can produce a very sound list of the occur- time. The check-list is based mainly on the collection of ring species in a relatively short time. The information A.B.R.I. (African Butterfly Research Institute, Nairobi). Furthermore records from the collection of the National density is frequently underestimated and collection data Museum of Kenya (Nairobi), the BIOTA-project and from offers a description of species diversity within a local literature were included in this list. In total 491 species or area, in particular with reference to rapid measurement 55 % of approximately 900 Kenyan species could be veri- of biodiversity (Trueman & Cranston 1997, Danks 1998, fied for the area. 31 species were not recorded before from Trojan 2000). Kenyan territory, 9 of them were described as new since the appearance of the book by Larsen (1996). The kind of list being produced here represents an information source for the total species diversity of the Checkliste der Tagfalter des Kakamega-Waldschutzge- Kakamega forest.
    [Show full text]
  • TNP SOK 2011 Internet
    GARDEN ROUTE NATIONAL PARK : THE TSITSIKAMMA SANP ARKS SECTION STATE OF KNOWLEDGE Contributors: N. Hanekom 1, R.M. Randall 1, D. Bower, A. Riley 2 and N. Kruger 1 1 SANParks Scientific Services, Garden Route (Rondevlei Office), PO Box 176, Sedgefield, 6573 2 Knysna National Lakes Area, P.O. Box 314, Knysna, 6570 Most recent update: 10 May 2012 Disclaimer This report has been produced by SANParks to summarise information available on a specific conservation area. Production of the report, in either hard copy or electronic format, does not signify that: the referenced information necessarily reflect the views and policies of SANParks; the referenced information is either correct or accurate; SANParks retains copies of the referenced documents; SANParks will provide second parties with copies of the referenced documents. This standpoint has the premise that (i) reproduction of copywrited material is illegal, (ii) copying of unpublished reports and data produced by an external scientist without the author’s permission is unethical, and (iii) dissemination of unreviewed data or draft documentation is potentially misleading and hence illogical. This report should be cited as: Hanekom N., Randall R.M., Bower, D., Riley, A. & Kruger, N. 2012. Garden Route National Park: The Tsitsikamma Section – State of Knowledge. South African National Parks. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................2 2. ACCOUNT OF AREA........................................................................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • Integrative Analyses Unveil Speciation Linked to Host Plant Shift in Spialia
    1 Integrative analyses unveil speciation linked to host plant shift in 2 Spialia butterflies 3 4 5 JUAN L. HERNÁNDEZ-ROLDÁN1,2*, LEONARDO DAPPORTO1,3*, VLAD DINCĂ 1,4, JUAN C. 6 VICENTE5, EMILY A. HORNETT6, JINDRA ŠÍCHOVÁ7, VLADIMIR LUKHTANOV8,9, GERARD 7 TALAVERA1,10 & ROGER VILA1 8 9 1Institut de Biologia Evolutiva (CSIC-Universitat Pompeu Fabra), Passeig Marítim de la Barceloneta, 10 37, E-08003 Barcelona, Spain 11 2Departamento de Biología (Zoología), Facultad de Ciencias de la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 12 C/ Darwin, 2, E-28049 Madrid, Spain 13 3Department of Biology, University of Florence, Via Madonna del Piano 6, 50019, Sesto Fiorentino 14 (FI), Italy 15 4Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1, Canada 16 5C/ Witerico, 9A - Bajo B, E-28025 Madrid, Spain 17 6Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EJ, UK 18 7Institute of Entomology, Biology Centre ASCR, České Budějovice, Czech Republic 19 8Department of Karyosystematics, Zoological Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences, St. 20 Petersburg, Russia 21 9Department of Entomology, St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russia 22 10Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology and Museum of Comparative Zoology, 23 Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA 24 25 * These authors contributed equally to this work 26 27 Key words: Biogeography, butterflies, Lepidoptera, new species, phylogeny, speciation 28 29 Correspondence: Roger Vila, Fax: +34 932211011; E-mail: [email protected] 30 31 Running title: Speciation linked to host plant shift in Spialia 32 33 Abstract 34 Discovering cryptic species in well-studied areas and taxonomic groups can have profound implications in 35 understanding eco-evolutionary processes and in nature conservation because such groups often involve research 36 models and act as flagship taxa for nature management.
    [Show full text]
  • Mombasa Cement Ltd Vipingo EIA Study Report for Proposed Expansion MOMBASA CEMENT LTD (VIPINGO UNIT)
    Mombasa Cement Ltd Vipingo EIA Study Report for Proposed expansion MOMBASA CEMENT LTD (VIPINGO UNIT) P.O. BOX 83594-80100 MOMBASA Email: [email protected]; [email protected] GPS coordinates UTM X-0593567 & UTM Y- 9586780 PROPOSED EXPANSION OF MOMBASA CEMENT VIPINGO CLINKER AND CEMENT PRODUCTION PLANT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY REPORT PROJECT REPORT REF NO: NEMA/PR/5/2/13,587 Compiled by: J.Morumbasi Mong’oni EIA/EA Lead Expert Reg. No.0357 Philip. Manyi Omenge EIA/EA Lead Expert Reg. No. 1559 Dr. George Eshiamwata EIA/EA Lead Expert Reg. No 1781 P.O. Box 569-80100 Mombasa Kenya 0722 493 772 [email protected] DECEMBER 2015 Compiled by Philip M. Omenge, J. Morumbasi Mong‘oni, & Dr. George Eshiamwta, EIA/EA Lead Experts 2015 Page i Mombasa Cement Ltd Vipingo EIA Study Report for Proposed expansion MOMBASA CEMENT LTD (VIPINGO UNIT) P.O. BOX 83594-80100 MOMBASA Email: [email protected]; [email protected] PROPOSED EXPANSION OF MOMBASA CEMENT VIPINGO CLINKER AND CEMENT PRODUCTION PLANT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY REPORT PROJECT REPORT REF NO: NEMA/PR/5/2/13,587 Compiled by: J.Morumbasi Mong’oni EIA/EA Lead Expert Reg. No.0357 Philip. Manyi Omenge EIA/EA Lead Expert Reg. No. 1559 Dr. George Eshiamwata EIA/EA Lead Expert Reg. No 1781 Compiled by Philip M. Omenge, J. Morumbasi Mong‘oni, & Dr. George Eshiamwta, EIA/EA Lead Experts 2015 Page ii Mombasa Cement Ltd Vipingo EIA Study Report for Proposed expansion Environmental Audit Report Submitted by MOMBASA CEMENT LIMITED P.O BOX 83594-80100 MOMBASA Tel 041 3434486 Email: [email protected] HASHUMUKH PATEL .......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence from European Butterfly Sister Species
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.04.282962; this version posted November 3, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 The Pleistocene species pump past its prime: 2 evidence from European butterfly sister species 1 1 2 3 Sam Ebdon* , Dominik R. Laetsch , Leonardo Dapporto , 3 4 5 4 Alexander Hayward , Michael G. Ritchie , Vlad Dinc˘a , Roger 6 1 5 Vila , and Konrad Lohse 1 6 Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, 7 Edinburgh, EH9 3FL, UK 2 8 ZEN lab, Dipartimento di Biologia dell'Universit`adi Firenze, 9 Firenze, Italy 3 10 Centre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, 11 Penryn Campus, Cornwall, TR10 9FE, UK 4 12 Centre for Biological Diversity, School of Biology, University of St 13 Andrews, Fife KY16 9TH, UK 5 14 Ecology and Genetics Research Unit, University of Oulu, Oulu, 15 Finland 6 16 Institut de Biologia Evolutiva (CSIC - Universitat Pompeu 17 Fabra), Passeig Mar´ıtimde la Barceloneta 37, ESP-08003 18 Barcelona, Spain 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.04.282962; this version posted November 3, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
    [Show full text]
  • Mombasa Cement Limited EIA Study Report for Proposed Wind Farm
    MOMBASA CEMENT LTD P.O. BOX 83594-80100 MOMBASA Email: [email protected] PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF 36 MEGAWATTS WIND FARM AT TAKAUNGU/ MAVUENI LOCATION, VIPINGO ON LAND PARCELS MN/III/291/2 AND MN/III/4391, KILIFI COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY REPORT PROJECT REPORT REF. NEMA/ PR/5/2/16,805 Compiled by: Philip Manyi Omenge – EIA/EA Lead Expert Reg. No 1559 Dr. George Eshiamwata – EIA/EA Lead Expert Reg. No. 1781 J. Morumbasi Mong.oni – EIA/EA Lead ExpertReg. No. 0357 2016 Mombasa Cement Limited EIA Study Report for Proposed Wind Farm MOMBASA CEMENT LTD P.O. BOX 83594-80100 MOMBASA Email: [email protected] PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF 36 MEGAWATTS WIND FARM AT TAKAUNGU/ MAVUENI LOCATION, VIPINGO ON LAND PARCELS MN/III/291/2 AND MN/III/4391 KILIFI COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY REPORT Compiled by: J.Morumbasi Mong’oni EIA/EA Lead Expert Reg. No.0357 Philip. Manyi Omenge EIA/EA Lead Expert Reg. No. 1559 Dr. George Eshiamwata EIA/EA Lead Expert Reg. No 1781 Compiled by P.M. Omenge EIA/EA Lead Expert, Dr. G. Eshiamwata EIA/EA Lead Expet and J.M Mong’oni EIA/EA Lead Expert Page ii Mombasa Cement Limited EIA Study Report for Proposed Wind Farm MOMBASA CEMENT LTD P.O. BOX 83594-80100 MOMBASA Email: [email protected] PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF 36 MEGAWATTS WIND FARM AT TAKAUNGU/ MAVUENI LOCATION, VIPINGO ON LAND PARCELS MN/III/291/2 AND MN/III/4391 KILIFI COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY REPORT Submitted by HASHUMUKH PATEL ................................................................................ Director Compiled by P.M.
    [Show full text]