DOCSLIB.ORG

Makara Estuary Baseline and Construction Monitoring Plan (MEBCMP)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Makara Estuary Baseline and Construction Monitoring Plan (MEBCMP) Makara Estuary Baseline and Construction Monitoring Plan (MEBCMP) Prepared for Meridian Energy Ltd eCoast Ltd Marine Consulting and Research PO Box 151 Raglan New Zealand Telephone: +64 21 423 224 Email: [email protected] MEBCMP Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 THE SITE ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 2 METHODOLOGY ...................................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 PROPOSED LOCATIONS OF MONITORING ............................................................................................................ 3 2.2 BIOLOGICAL DATA COLLECTION ........................................................................................................................ 4 2.3 BIOLOGICAL DATA ANALYSIS ............................................................................................................................ 6 2.4 SEDIMENT DEPOSITION DATA COLLECTION ......................................................................................................... 9 3 REPORTING ........................................................................................................................................... 10 4 REFERENCES ......................................................................................................................................... 11 APPENDIX 1 – MAKARA ESTUARY BASELINE AND CONSTRUCTION MONITORING PLAN ................................ 13 APPENDIX 2 – EXPERT WITNESS EVIDENCE OF SHAW MEAD FOR MILL CREEK ENVIRONMENT COURT PROCEEDINGS ................................................................................................................................................ 15 List of Figures Figure 1.1. Locality map of Makara Estuary (Source: Google Earth). ....................... 2 Figure 2.1. Sampling locations for the MEBCMP. Site 1 also includes cobble habitat monitoring (blue box). ................................................................................................. 8 Figure 2.2 A plate being buried on a tidal flat (http://www.geog.sussex.ac.uk, 2004). 9 i MEBCMP 1 Introduction The Makara Estuary Baseline and Construction Monitoring Plan (MEBCMP) has been prepared on behalf of Meridian Energy Ltd (MEL) for one of the Conditions of Consent for the Mill Creek: “The consent holder shall engage an appropriately qualified and experienced estuarine ecologist to prepare and submit a Makara Estuary Baseline and Construction Monitoring Plan ("the MEBCMP") to the Manager, Environmental Regulation, Wellington Regional Council, for approval at least 20 working days prior to the proposed start date of the baseline water quality monitoring programme site.” The condition specifies that the baseline monitoring shall commence at least 6 months prior to bulk earthworks. At this stage, dry-season (March 2012) and wet- seaon (September 2012) baseline monitoring is proposed to time with the commencement of constrution in October 2012. The MEBCMP has been developed using the details provided in the condition – attached as Appendix 1. Appendix 2 is the Environment Court Evidence for the Mill Creek Resource Consent for Environment Court compiled by Dr. Shaw Mead, which includes the lastest of a series marine and estuarine investigations associated with Project Westwind “State of the Environment Assessment for Makara Beach, Makara Estuary, Ohau Bay and Oteranga Bay – Wellington coast 2010” compiled by Dr.’s Mead and Haggitt (the ecologists engaged by MEL), and list the previous 5 investigations dating back to 2004. CV’s of Dr’s Shaw Mead and Tim Haggitt, the ecologists engaged to undertake the MEBCMP, accompany this document. 1.1 The Site The entrance to Makara Estuary is located at the northern end of Makara Beach (Ohariu Bay), west of Wellington (Figure 1.1), and is fed by the Makara River. The estuary proper is bounded by the seaward entrance and the location where highest 1 MEBCMP spring tides encroach up river (approximately 1.5 km). The estuary is approximately 80 m wide at its widest point near the entrance and narrows to 20 m wide 1 km from the entrance. It incorporates 2-3ha of saltmarsh, and is mostly 1-3 m deep. The estuary margins are modified and vegetated with various scrub species, saltmarsh, terrestrial grass and weed, which provide reasonable habitat for whitebait spawning (Taylor and Kelly, 2001). Makara Estuary Figure 1.1. Locality map of Makara Estuary (Source: http://mapping.gw.govt.nz/gwrc/). 2 MEBCMP 2 Methodology The monitoring methodology will expand on the sampling undertaken at Makara Estuary in February 2010 (Appendix 2). Monitoring will target macro and meio-fauna abundance and diversity, and sediment deposition rates. Monitoring will be undertaken every 6 months. At this stage, the base-line monitoring data will be collected for the dry-season (March 2012) and wet-seaon (September 2012) in order to time with the commencement of construction in October 2012. Six-monthly data collection will be undertaken for the duration of construction and for 12 months following construction. 2.1 Proposed Locations of Monitoring Three locations within the estuary will be monitored (Figure 2.1): 1. the inner entrance (previously sampled in 2010); 2. 400 m upstream of the entrance, and; 3. 800 m upstream of the entrance. At each site, biological and physical sampling will be undertaken. A table of GPS positions for each sample location will be provided with the first report (Baseline Monitoring Report I). In addition, general environmental health of the estuary will be recorded with photography and described during each monitoring visit. For example, details of any particular characteristics that are noted during monitoring which may influence the results e.g. activities or incidents occurring in the Makara Catchment, any changes to the extent of the saltmarsh, presence of seagrass, erosion of the banks, stock encroachment, etc. Erosion of the estuary/river banks has been observed to be a contributor to sediment inputs (Section 30, Appendix 2). The banks of the estuary will be video-surveyed along its 1.5 km length. Areas of active erosion (e.g. near the Opau Road intersection) will be measured to easily identified benchmarks (e.g. fence posts, 3 MEBCMP large trees, road edge, etc.). Both the video-survey and benchmarking will provide information of additional sediment inputs directly into the estuary. Further data is also available to assess environmental characteristics that my influence the results – the Baseline Aquatic Monitoring. This monitoring has been undertaken for up to 5 years in some locations and includes macro-invertebrates, temperature, dissolved oxygen, pH, suspended sediments, NTU and visual clarity assessments at 16 sampling sites throughout the catchment. Rain gauges at Mill Creek and West Wind will provide additional information and any "observations" of activities occurring within the catchments which may contribute to deposition of sediment in the estuary between monitoring regimes1 will be recorded as part of the Baseline Aquatic Monitoring Plan (BAMP) for Mill Creek. 2.2 Biological Data Collection Monitoring of species composition has regularly been used to consider sedimentation-related effects in estuaries; this is often in association with specific events or modifications to the estuary or catchment, as is the potential in the present case (e.g. (Turner & Riddle, 2001; Gibbs and Hewitt 2004). Different species are associated with different types of sediment, especially infaunal species such as bivalves and polycheates (marine worms). Thus, by assessing the biological community composition and how it changes (or does not change) with time, sedimentation rates/impacts can be evaluated. Data collection will be the same as used at other GWR estuaries (e.g. Robertson and Stevens, 2008), with respect to numbers of replicates (n=12), size of quadrats (0.25 m2), and sediment sample collection (250 gms from the top 20 mm of sediment cores). The general sampling protocol will: 1. Establish what species and communities are present at each of the three locations within the Makara Estuary (baseline data for dry and wet seasons) prior to the proposed works being undertaken; 1 The BAMP includes water quality monitoring after every rainfall event exceeding 20 mm over 24 hours and 3 monthly for macro-invertebrates. 4 MEBCMP 2. Determine what species and communities are of value to employ as indicator species; 3. Develop “effect thresholds” that will constitute an “effect” (defined as percent change) for those indicator species and communities; 4. Undertake temporal sampling during and following the construction phase of the proposed works, and; 5. Undertake analysis of temporal data following each sampling period to gauge magnitude and direction of effects (if any) through time associated with the proposed works. Note: Due to the unavailability of a comparable control location within the general region of Makara Estuary or along the southern NW coast, (see Robertson and Stevens 2007) the focus of the sampling design will be to measure possible changes through space and time before and after the proposed works only within the Makara Estuary. However, based on the methodology proposed we feel that detection of environmental effects will be
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Anna Crighton (President), James Blackburne, Peter Dowell And
    HISTORIC PLACES WELLINGTON INC PO BOX 12426 THORNDON WELLINGTON Wellington 6144 Newsletter No. 4. May 2013 JOIN US In this issue: To join Historic Places Wellington or learn more about Historic Places Aotearoa, go US Marines Hall, Titahi Bay to www.historicplacesaotearoa.org.nz Harcourts Building CONTACT US Heritage New Zealand Bill Our email address is Petone Historic Area Plan Change [email protected] Recent HPT Registrations Earthquake Engineering Conference FORTHCOMING EVENTS Tour of Heritage office buildings Mid-Winter Talk on HPT Register Fever Hospital, Mt Victoria Thursday 11th July 7.30 pm - School of Architecture Forthcoming Events AGM Communicating with members Thursday 12th September 5.30 pm Museum of the City and Sea US Marines Hall, Titahi Bay Historic Places Wellington is opposing an application by Porirua City Council for resource consent to demolish this building. The City Council is the building’s owner. The building, which has in recent decades been used by the Porirua Little Theatre, was constructed in 1942-43, during World War 2, as a recreation hall for the U.S. Marines stationed at the Titahi Bay Camp. Eight camps were established along the West Coast of the Wellington region during that time either using buildings already in existence (such as the old golf club house at Titahi Bay) or constructing purpose built facilities within very tight time frames. Since the war these buildings have gradually been demolished and now the hall at Titahi Bay is the only purpose built structure still in existence from these eight camps and still in its original location.
    [Show full text]
  • Audit of Potentially Significant Natural Areas for Wellington City: Stage 1 Desktop Analysis
    AUDIT OF POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT NATURAL AREAS FOR WELLINGTON CITY: STAGE 1 DESKTOP ANALYSIS R3942 AUDIT OF POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT NATURAL AREAS FOR WELLINGTON CITY: STAGE 1 DESKTOP ANALYSIS Areas of potentially significant indigenous biodiversity occur throughout Wellington City. Contract Report No. 3942 December 2016 Project Team: Astrid van Meeuwen-Dijkgraaf - Site assessments and report author Steve Rate - Site assessments and report review Prepared for: Wellington City Council PO Box 2199 Wellington 6140 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. PROJECT SCOPE 1 2.1 Stage 1 Desktop analysis 1 2.2 Study area 2 3. METHODS 4 4. ECOLOGICAL CONTEXT 5 4.1 Wellington and Cook Strait Ecological Districts 5 4.1.1 Wellington Ecological District 6 4.1.2 Cook Strait Ecological District 7 4.2 Ecological domains 10 4.3 Singers and Rogers ecosystem classification 10 4.4 Threatened Environment Classification 11 4.5 Protected Natural Areas 13 5. RESULTS 13 5.1 Overview of potential SNAs in Wellington City 13 5.2 Potential SNAs requiring additional information and/or site visits 16 5.3 Management criteria 20 6. RECOMMENDATIONS 20 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 20 REFERENCES 21 appendices 1. Policy 23 of the Regional Policy Statement for the Wellington region (GWRC 2013) 24 2 Explanatory notes for SNA database fields 26 3 ‘Threatened’, ‘At Risk’, and regionally uncommon species in Wellington region 28 4 Management Criteria (revised from Wildland Consultuants and Kessels Ecology 2015) 32 5 Sites without any indigenous vegetation or habitat remaining that have been deleted from the database 33 6 Ecosystem types that are no longer commonplace or are poorly represented in existing protected areas 35 7 Potential SNAs in Wellington City grouped by significance and survey requirements 37 8 Summary descriptions and assessment of Potential SNAs in Wellington City 48 © 2016 Contract Report No.
    [Show full text]
  • Cross Country Chronicle Or It’S Editor
    September 2007 The Official Magazine of The Cross Country Vehicle Club (Wellington) Inc PO Box 38-762, Te Puni, Wellington For non $5 Members www.ccvc.org.nz Cross Country Vehicle Club (Wellington) Inc PO Box 38-762, Te Puni, Wellington www.ccvc.org.nz Life Members George Bean Peter Boniface Tom Adams Graham Barr Leith Bean (Deceased) (Deceased) Stuart Brown Andy Cockroft Owen Farghar Mike Gall John Hughes Bob Jeffrey Heather Jeffrey Ron Johnson Steve Lacy Colin Landy (Deceased) Ron Oliver Phil Lewton Vern Lill Bruce Mulhare Raynor Mulhare (Deceased) Peter Osborne Ross Perkins Grant Purdie Tony Street Ron Wadham The club meets at 7:30pm on the 2nd Wednesday of each month at the Petone Working Mans Club, Udy Street, Petone. MAGAZINE CONTRIBUTIONS This is your magazine so it can only be as good as the contributions you make!! We need any articles, trip reports, technical items, “How-To’s”, etc to be in the hands of the editor by the end of each calendar month. Please post to 34a Hine Rd Wainuiomata, fax to 04 914 8366 or email to [email protected] SAFETY POLICY Should any members fail to return from any outing, four wheel drive or otherwise, whether as a club member or as a private individual, the following person/s should be contacted in the first instance: Jim Johnson - 938 9404 (Hm) or 021 389 404 Gavin Holden - 0274 249 1959 Rodney Bracefield - 234 8887 (Hm), 577 8033 (Wk) or 027 548 8808 DISCLAIMER: The opinions expressed in this magazine are those of the contributors and not necessarily those of the club, it’s executive or committee members.
    [Show full text]
  • Key Native Ecosystem Operational Plan for Wellington South Coast 2020-2025
    Key Native Ecosystem Operational Plan for Wellington South Coast 2020-2025 Contents 1. Purpose 1 2. Policy Context 1 3. The Key Native Ecosystem Programme 2 4. Wellington South Coast Key Native Ecosystem site 3 5. Parties involved 4 6. Ecological values 6 7. Threats to ecological values at the KNE site 10 8. Vision and objectives 13 9. Operational activities 13 10. Operational delivery schedule 17 11. Funding contributions 20 Appendix 1: Site maps 21 Appendix 2: Nationally threatened species list 25 Appendix 3: Ecological weed species 27 References 29 Wellington South Coast 1. Purpose The purpose of the five-year Key Native Ecosystem (KNE) Operational Plan for Wellington South Coast KNE site is to: Identify the parties involved Summarise the ecological values and identify the threats to those values Outline the objectives to improve ecological condition Describe operational activities (eg, ecological weed control) that will be undertaken, who will undertake the activities and the allocated budget KNE Operational Plans are reviewed every five years to ensure the activities undertaken to protect and restore the KNE site are informed by experience and improved knowledge about the site. This KNE Operational Plan is aligned to key policy documents that are outlined below (in Section 2). 2. Policy Context Regional councils have responsibility for maintaining indigenous biodiversity, as well as protecting significant vegetation and habitats of threatened species, under the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA)1. Plans and Strategies that guide the delivery of the KNE Programme are: Greater Wellington Long Term Plan The Long Term Plan (2018-2028)2 outlines the long term direction of the Greater Wellington Regional Council (Greater Wellington) and includes information on all our major projects, activities and programmes for the next 10 years and how they will be paid for.
    [Show full text]
  • District Plan Change 32
    Abbott Allan Submitter Number: 349 Submission Number: 1 Plan Section Name: Chapter 26 Renewable Energy Rules Support/Oppose: oppose Specific Provisions: Chapter 26 - General Submissions Submission: Wind power is a good idea in appropriate places. City hills are inappropriate. Makara is an important recreation area. Solar and other renewable options should be investigated. Decision Requested: Decline and withdraw Chapter 26 Renewable Energy Rules. Aberhart Rachel Submitter Number: 275 Submission Number: 1 Plan Section Name: Chapter 26 Renewable Energy Rules Support/Oppose: oppose Specific Provisions: Chapter 26 - General Submissions Submission: Wind power is a good idea in appropriate places. City hills are inappropriate. Makara is an important recreation area. Solar and other renewable options should be investigated. Decision Requested: Decline and withdraw Chapter 26 Renewable Energy Rules. Adrian Natalie Submitter Number: 435 Submission Number: 1 Plan Section Name: Chapter 26 Renewable Energy Rules Support/Oppose: oppose Specific Provisions: Chapter 26 - General Submissions Submission: Not appropriate on Wellington's rural hills and coast. Decision Requested: Decline and withdraw Chapter 26 Renewable Energy Rules. Agnew William Submitter Number: 311 Submission Number: 1 Plan Section Name: Chapter 26 Renewable Energy Rules Support/Oppose: oppose Specific Provisions: Chapter 26 - General Submissions Submission: It is not acceptable that these rules should override all other rules in the District Plan. Do not cover the rural hills of Wellington
    [Show full text]
  • Western Treatment Plant Outfall Pipeline
    Management and Monitoring Plan Western Wastewater Treatment Plant Effluent Pipeline This report has been prepared solely for the benefit of Wellington City Council. No liability is accepted by this company or any employee or sub-consultant of this company with respect to its use by any other person. This disclaimer shall apply notwithstanding that the report June be made available to other persons for an application for permission or approval or to fulfil a legal requirement. Control Sheet Document Title: Management and Monitoring Plan – Western Wastewater Treatment Plant Effluent Pipeline Prepared by: Edward Yong Reviewed by: Anna Hector Authorised by: Gary O’Meara Document Control Register Version Status Date Details of Revision 0 Draft Draft Executive Summary The Maintenance and Monitoring Plan (MMP) covers the requirements of the Wellington City Council (WCC) Western Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) regarding the Western WWTP effluent pipeline inspection and maintenance of integrity. The effluent pipeline must be managed and monitored for leaks or failures to avoid, mitigate, and remedy any adverse effects of discharging treated wastewater to the Karori Stream. An annual report regarding the outfall pipeline must be generated to cover inspections, observations, repairs and planned remedial activities over the previous year. Also, the methodologies and mitigation measures for highly sensitive areas identified in the Ecological Report were also incorporated into the MMP. The information contained within this MMP is intended to meet GWRC requirements and prepared with reference to the “Erosion and Sediment Control Guidelines for the Wellington Region”. This MMP must be read and implemented as part of any contract documentation prior to commencement of earthworks on the site.
    [Show full text]
  • Management & Monitoring Plan
    This document was approved by GWRC *-----TBA----- * 2015. It supersedes all previous management plans for the project. A copy of this document must be supplied to all parties working on the pipeline, and available on site at all times. WCC’s Western Wellington Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) Main Outfall Pipeline (Karori Stream to Makara Coast) Management & Monitoring Plan Prepared for: Wellington Water On behalf of Wellington City Council October 2015 Cardno Ref: NZ01-14121 Wellington Water Ref: PO 0000008830 Karori Main Outfall Pipeline Management & Monitoring Plan Contact Information Document Information Cardno Limited Prepared for Wellington City Council Trading as Cardno (NZ) Limited Project Name Management & Company No: 036749 Monitoring Plan File Reference NZ0114121-PL- (Wellington / Head Office) Management & 25 Victoria Street, Petone, Lower Hutt 5012 Monitoring Plan-Karori MOP-FINAL 5 Oct 15-v5 PO Box 38-098, Wellington Mail Centre, Petone I.docx Lower Hutt 5045, New Zealand Project Reference NZ0114121 Telephone: (04) 478-0342 Date October 2015 [email protected] www.cardno.com Document Control Date Description Author Author Reviewer Initials (Signature) Version 1 08/08/2014 Draft Management Plan for Client Comment JKG 1A 21/08/2014 Draft following comment for client approval JKG 1B 09/09/2014 As above – additional client input added JKG 1C 3/10/2014 Final Draft for Submission to GWRC with final JKG client comments added 1D 22/10/2014 Final amendments as agreed with client JKG Anna Hector following additional client input 1E 25/06/2015 Final Draft for GWRC Consultation – allowed JKG Anna for fish rescue methodology to be appended.
    [Show full text]
  • Cross Country Chronicle 1 Rallywoods with Steve, 18/07/2010
    September 2010 The Official Magazine of The Cross Country Vehicle Club (Wellington) Inc PO Box 38-762, Te Puni 5045, Wellington Cross Country Chronicle www.ccvc.org.nzPage 1 Rallywoods with Steve, 18/07/2010 Terawhiti Station Cross Country Chronicle Page 2 Cross Country Vehicle Club (Wellington) Inc PO Box 38-762 Te Puni 5045 Wellington www.ccvc.org.nz The club meets at 7:30pm on the 2nd Wednesday of each month at the Petone Working Mans Club, Udy Street, Petone. Position Name Home Phone Work Phone Cellphone Email Club Officers President Ralph Dobson 526 5119 568 5562 027 494 6699 [email protected] Vice President Stewart Burrell 529 7295 576 0813 021 999 263 [email protected] Immed Past President Paul Adams 04 905 2343 027 594 1343 [email protected] Secretary Dennis McKinlay 04 234 7317 04 496 9611 021 396 966 [email protected] Treasurer David Kibblewhite 577 0680 021 765 554 [email protected] Club Captain Charles Odlin 562 8657 462 3350 021 372 990 [email protected] General Committee Members Driver Training Officer Steve Mercer 233 1121 386 0300 027 442 2898 [email protected] Entertainment Officer John Vruink 567 1142 027 443 9981 027 443 9981 [email protected] Membership Officer Mike Stephens 04 902 2559 021 260 0975 [email protected] Land Access Manager Grant Purdie 233 1207 021 612 216 021 612 216 [email protected] New Members Officer Steve O’Callaghan 235 9849 021 131 0647 [email protected] Newsletter Editor Alan Donaldson 564 3045 914 8352 021 448 127 [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • District Plan Change 33
    Abbott Allan Submitter Number: 422 Submission Number: 1 Plan Section Name: Plan Change 33 Support/Oppose: oppose Specific Provisions: General Submissions Submission: Wellington's hills are highly valued. The rural area and city hills should be protected from man built development. Quartz HIll is special and an important landform as are the coastal hills north and south of Makara. Decision Requested: 1) Quartz Hill be included in the planning maps, 2) All rural ridgetops/ hilltops be included in planning maps, 3) Quartz Hill be recognised for its important historic, geological, recreational and landscape values (a higher level of protection), 4) All areas in planning maps be protected from built development. Aberhart Rachel Submitter Number: 312 Submission Number: 1 Plan Section Name: Plan Change 33 Support/Oppose: oppose Specific Provisions: General Submissions Submission: Protect the hilltops in Wellington, especially Quartz Hill. Decision Requested: 1) Preserve and protect Quartz Hill. 2) Protect rural and natural urban ridge tops from man built development Acton Graeme Submitter Number: 107 Submission Number: 1 Plan Section Name: Plan Change 33 Support/Oppose: oppose Specific Provisions: General Submissions Submission: These changes could lead to alterations of these natural features for commercial gain. The suggestion that quartz hill, or any other prominent ridgelines or hilltops, be allowed to be altered by private companies is fundamentally anti - democratic Decision Requested: 1) That Quartz Hill be given recognition for its important historic, geological, recreational and landscape values and 2) Quartz Hill be included in the planning maps and in the proactive overlay Adrian Natalie Submitter Number: 441 Submission Number: 1 Plan Section Name: Plan Change 33 Support/Oppose: oppose Specific Provisions: General Submissions Submission: I believe the area (Quartz Hill) to be special and should be protected as it has outstanding landscapes and high amenity value.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography of Plant Checklists and Vegetation Survey Data for Wellington Conservancy (Excluding Chatham Islands)
    Bibliography of plant checklists and vegetation survey data for Wellington Conservancy (excluding Chatham Islands) 2ND EDITION, JUNE 2001 Bibliography of plant checklists and vegetation survey data for Wellington Conservancy (excluding Chatham Islands) 2nd edition, June 2001 Prepared by John Sawyer Published by: Department of Conservation P. O. Box 5086 Wellington NEW ZEALAND This bibliography of checklists was prepared by John Sawyer, Wellington Conservancy, Department of Conservation. It was edited by Barbara Mitcalfe, Chris Horne and Pat Enright of the Wellington Botanical Society. First published 1998 as A bibliography of plant checklists and vegetation survey data sets for areas in Wellington Conservancy (excluding Chatham Islands). ISBN: 0-478-22044-8 © 2001 Department of Conservation CONTENTS Executive Summary 1 1. Introduction 2 2. How to compile a plant checklist 7 3. Checklists and survey data 8 3.1 General 8 3.2 Wellington Ecological District 8 Wellington Botanic Garden 8 Wellington City – Khandallah 9 Wellington City – Otari/Wilton’s Bush 9 Wellington – western hills and coast 9 Wellington City – Miramar peninsula 12 Wellington City – Ngaio 13 Wellington City – Karori 13 Wellington City – general 14 Matiu/Somes Island 15 Mokopuna (Leper) Island 15 Makaro (Ward) Island 16 Ngauranga Escarpment 16 Porirua City 16 Colonial Knob 17 Pauatahanui Inlet and catchment 17 Tawa 19 Plimmerton and Taupo Swamp 19 Titahi Bay (including Whitireia Park) 20 Pukerua Bay 21 Hutt Valley and surrounding hills 23 Belmont Regional Park and adjacent
    [Show full text]
  • Makara Community Emergency Hub Guide
    REVIEWED JUNE 2019 Makara Community Emergency Hub Guide This Hub is a place for the community to coordinate your efforts to help each other during and after a disaster. Objectives of the Community Emergency Hub are to: › Provide information so that your community knows how to help each other and stay safe. › Understand what is happening. Wellington Region › Solve problems using what your community has available. Emergency Managment Office › Provide a safe gathering place for members of the Logo Specificationscommunity to support one another. Single colour reproduction WELLINGTON REGION Whenever possible, the logo should be reproduced EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT in full colour. When producing the logo in one colour, OFFICE the Wellington Region Emergency Managment may be in either black or white. WELLINGTON REGION Community Emergency Hub Guide a EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT OFFICE Colour reproduction It is preferred that the logo appear in it PMS colours. When this is not possible, the logo should be printed using the specified process colours. WELLINGTON REGION EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT OFFICE PANTONE PMS 294 PMS Process Yellow WELLINGTON REGION EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT OFFICE PROCESS C100%, M58%, Y0%, K21% C0%, M0%, Y100%, K0% Typeface and minimum size restrictions The typeface for the logo cannot be altered in any way. The minimum size for reproduction of the logo is 40mm wide. It is important that the proportions of 40mm the logo remain at all times. Provision of files All required logo files will be provided by WREMO. Available file formats include .eps, .jpeg and .png About this guide This guide provides information to help you set up and run the Community Emergency Hub.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Policies of IEA Countries New Zealand
    Please note that this PDF is subject to specific restrictions that limit its use and distribution. The terms and conditions are available online at www.iea.org/about/copyright.asp Energy Policies of IEA Countries New Zealand 2010 Review Energy Policies of IEA Countries New Zealand New Zealand’s strong commitment to liberalised energy markets has delivered a relatively high level of energy security and economic prosperity for consumers. Since the previous IEA review in 2006, the government has built on the success of existing policy mechanisms and implemented a number of far-reaching changes in the electricity sector and environmental policy. But progress in some sectors, such as energy efficiency, has not been as strong as anticipated. In mid-2010, the government commenced a review of the New Zealand Energy Strategy. The result is the publication of a new energy strategy, which establishes clear long-term policy priorities and energy-savings goals. Implementing these strategies will bring many new challenges, including attainment of the government’s medium-term energy-savings targets. New Zealand enjoys the advantage of a diverse and balanced portfolio of renewable-energy resources, which contribute over 70% of electricity output – the third highest portion in IEA member countries. This resource base has the potential to deliver greater volumes of energy and the government aspires to increase this proportion to 90% of electricity generation by 2025. Meeting this target will bring many benefits but also tough challenges, such as maintaining a robust National Grid. This review analyses the energy-policy challenges facing New Zealand and provides sectoral critiques and recommendations for further policy improvements.
    [Show full text]