Fiscal 2021 Congressional Budget Justification

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Fiscal 2021 Congressional Budget Justification LIBRARY OF CONGRESS FISCAL 2021 BUDGET JUSTIFICATION SUBMITTED FOR USE OF THE COMMITTEES ON APPROPRIATIONS Provided by Brian Williams TABLE OF CONTENTS LIBRARY OF CONGRESS OVERVIEW FISCAL 2021 ................................................................................1 ORGANIZATION CHART ................................................................................................................................5 SUMMARY TABLES .........................................................................................................................................7 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS, SALARIES AND EXPENSES 15 OFFICE OF THE LIBRARIAN ................................................................................................................................19 Fiscal 2021 Program Changes ..................................................................................................................21 OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER ....................................................................................................27 Fiscal 2021 Program Changes ..................................................................................................................30 Chief Operating Officer .............................................................................................................................32 Financial Services Directorate ..................................................................................................................38 Integrated Support Services .....................................................................................................................43 OFFICE OF THE CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER ..............................................................................................47 Fiscal 2021 Program Changes ..................................................................................................................49 LIBRARY COLLECTIONS & SERVICES GROUP ...................................................................................................63 Fiscal 2021 Program Changes ..................................................................................................................66 LCSG – Library Services .............................................................................................................................75 LCSG – Law Library....................................................................................................................................87 OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL ..............................................................................................................95 COPYRIGHT OFFICE, SALARIES AND EXPENSES 99 Fiscal 2021 Program Changes ................................................................................................................102 COPYRIGHT BASIC ............................................................................................................................................105 COPYRIGHT LICENSING DIVISION ..................................................................................................................111 COPYRIGHT ROYALTY JUDGES ........................................................................................................................115 CONGRESSIONAL RESEARCH SERVICE, SALARIES AND EXPENSES 119 Fiscal 2021 Program Changes ................................................................................................................121 NLS FOR THE BLIND AND PRINT DISABLED, SALARIES AND EXPENSES 127 Table of Contents i REIMBURSABLE FUNDS ............................................................................................................................133 REVOLVING FUNDS.....................................................................................................................................135 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS FISCAL 2020 APPROPRIATIONS LANGUAGE .....................................139 APPENDICES ..................................................................................................................................................141 Appendix A: Information Technology Modernization Update ...................................................................................142 Appendix B: Hosting Facilities Challenge – Data Center Migration Plan Update .........................................................144 Appendix C: American Folklife Center and Veterans History Project .........................................................................146 Appendix D: Overseas Offices, Cooperative Acquisitions Program ............................................................................147 Appendix E: Acquisition of Library Materials by Source Fiscal 2015 – Fiscal 2019 .......................................................156 Appendix F: Library of Congress Mass Deacidification Project ......................................................................................... 157 Appendix G: Teaching with Primary Sources (TPS) ...................................................................................................159 Appendix H: Copyright Office – Estimated Value of Materials Transferred to the Library in Fiscal 2019 ........................163 Appendix I: Copyright Office Modernization .................................................................................................................... 165 Appendix J: Fiscal 2020 – 2025 Facility Project Plan ......................................................................................................... 168 Appendix K: Collection Storage Modules ......................................................................................................................... 177 Appendix L: Performance Measures and Customer Service ............................................................................................. 178 Appendix M: NLS Modernization ...................................................................................................................................... 179 Appendix N: Public Recommendations (per P.L. 115-414) ............................................................................................... 181 Appendix O: Visitor Experience Initiative ......................................................................................................................... 190 Appendix P: Advertising (per P.L. 116-94, Explanatory Statement) .................................................................................. 191 Appendix Q: Non-Recur Schedule .................................................................................................................................... 193 ARCHITECT OF THE CAPITOL – LIBRARY BUILDINGS AND GROUNDS .....................................195 ii LIBRARY OF CONGRESS FISCAL 2021 BUDGET JUSTIFICATION LIBRARY OF CONGRESS OVERVIEW FISCAL 2021 The Library of Congress is submitting its fiscal 2021 appropriations request in alignment with the strategic goals set forth in the fiscal 2019-2023 Strategic Plan: Expand access, enhance services, optimize resources, and measure impact. A recently re- leased implementation roadmap serves as a guide to monitor and evaluate progress — and ultimately achieve — the four stra- tegic goals. With significant congressional support, the Library has moved forward in the past several years to modernize and optimize its operations in ways that fulfill the strategic goals and direction. The Congressional Research Service’s (CRS’s) next-generation Integrated Research and Information System (IRIS), for example, is well underway. A U.S. Copyright Office (USCO) Recor- dation system, replacing the existing paper-based process, will be pilot tested in spring 2020 as part of copyright IT modern- ization efforts. IT centralization is now complete under the Office of the Chief Information Officer (OCIO). The Library is on schedule to complete the Data Center Transformation project in fiscal 2020, transitioning data center operations from the aging primary data center in the Madison Building to a hybrid-hosting model. The new hosting model will ensure that the Library has a secure, flexible, efficient and stable foundation for its technology needs for the next generation. Modernization advancements extend beyond IT systems. Replacement of the second of four quadrants of Law Library shelv- ing, installed in 1981 and now nearly unusable, is complete, with replacement for the third quadrant (Quad B) requested in fiscal 2021. Storage modules at Ft. Meade are providing a 21st century, environmentally optimized, lower cost way to preserve more physical collections. The Library’s world-class preservation experts have examined their preservation activities and we are recommending rebalancing our preservation strategies. Master planning for the Visitor Experience, now underway, will in- corporate state-of-the-art audiovisual and interactive elements to capture the interest of contemporary audiences. The Center on Exhibits and Interpretation and the Center on Learning, Literacy and Engagement, created last year, are bringing innova- tion to the way the Library connects to users, physically and digitally. In another example, even the name change for the NLS, now known as the National Library Service for the Blind and Print Disabled, replaces outdated language and reflects modern- ization in the ways NLS serves its users. Organizational changes that support modernization and optimization are now in place. In fiscal 2020, the Library Collections
Recommended publications
  • WHTP-2009-06-National-Security-1.Pdf
    ABOUT THE AUTHOR Louis Fisher is Specialist in Constitutional Law with the Law Library of the Library of Congress. The views expressed here are personal, not institutional. Earlier in his career at the Library of Congress, Fisher worked for the Congressional Research Service from 1970 to March 3, 2006. During his service with CRS he was Senior Specialist in Separation of Powers and research director of the House Iran-Contra Committee in 1987, writing major sections of the final report. Fisher received his doctorate in political science from the New School for Social Research and has taught at a number of universities and law schools. He is the author of eighteen books, including In the Name of National Security: Unchecked Presidential Power and the Reynolds Case (2006), Presidential War Power (2d ed. 2004), Military Tribunals and Presidential Power (2005), The Politics of Executive Privilege (2004), American Constitutional Law (with Katy J. Harriger, 8th ed. 2009), Constitutional Conflicts between Congress and the Presidency (5th ed. 2005), Nazi Saboteurs on Trial: A Military Tribunal and American Law (2003), and, most recently, The Constitution and 9/11: Recurring Threats to America’s Freedoms (2008). He has received four book awards. Fisher has been invited to testify before Congress on such issues as war powers, state secrets, CIA whistle-blowing, covert spending, NSA surveillance, executive privilege, executive spending discretion, presidential reorganization authority, Congress and the Constitution, the legislative veto, the item veto, the pocket veto, recess appointments, the budget process, the Gramm-Rudman-Hollings Act, the balanced budget amendment, biennial budgeting, presidential impoundment powers, and executive lobbying.
    [Show full text]
  • The Preservation Evolution a Review of Preservation Literature, 1999–2001
    47(2) LRTS 59 The Preservation Evolution A Review of Preservation Literature, 1999–2001 JeanAnn Croft The literature representing 1999 to 2001 reveals that the preservation field is absorbed in an evolution. The literature demonstrates that trusted practices are changing to improve outcomes and further advance the preservation field. Simultaneously, in the wake of the digital revolution, preservation professionals dream about merging traditional and digital technologies in the hope that both long-term preservation and enhanced access will be achieved. This article attempts to relate the values of the discipline in order to inspire further research and persuade more work in formulating hypotheses to integrate preservation the- ory and practice. Finally, this overview of the literature will communicate the scope of the preservation problem, clarify misconceptions in the field, and docu- ment areas that warrant further investigation and refinement. he literature representing 1999 to 2001 reveals that the preservation field is Tcontinually absorbed in an evolution. This literature review examines the trends and customs of the preservation field as documented in the literature, and attempts to relate the values of the discipline in order to inspire further research and persuade more work in formulating hypotheses to integrate preservation theory and practice. Finally, this depiction of the literature will communicate the scope of the preservation problem, clarify misconceptions in the field, and document areas that warrant further investigation and refinement. Following up the preceding preservation literature reviews that have been pub- lished in this journal, this work provides a sampling of the preservation litera- ture and will not include book reviews, annual reports, preservation project announcements, technical leaflets, and strictly specialized conservation litera- ture.
    [Show full text]
  • Capitol Hill Guide Welcome
    The Van Scoyoc Companies Capitol Hill Guide Welcome Welcome to Washington and the Van Scoyoc Companies. I hope you’ll find this guide useful during your visit to Capitol Hill. Our Country’s forefathers enshrined in the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution the people’s right “peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” They considered this right of equal importance with freedom of religion and freedom of the press. Thousands of Americans visit their elected representatives in the House and the Senate each year, providing Members of Congress and the Administration with vital insights into the Country’s needs and fears and wishes for the future. Unfortunately, many Americans today don’t appreciate this right – and this privilege – they have to influence government by making their views known, either directly or through agents and associations. The Founding Fathers knew that a great nation grew out of a vigorous competition of ideas and interests, and they designed our Government to accommodate conflicts, not quash them. We at the Van Scoyoc Companies have always believed that our primary role was to help our clients find honorable and effective ways to make their arguments known to those in power. Please don’t hesitate to ask anyone in our firms for something you may need during your visit to Washington. We don’t pretend to have the answer to every question, but I guarantee you that when we don’t, we know how to find it. Regards, Contents ciate sso s I a nc c o • y V Stu’s Welcome 2 o S C c o s n n s a Map of Capitol Hill 3 u v l • t c i a n Hints for Visiting Congressional Offices 4 p g i I t n o c • l D Useful Contacts 5 e c c isions In Restaurant Map 6 Recommended Restaurants 7 This guide was created for the convenience and sole use of clients and potential clients of the Van Map of Places to Visit 8 Scoyoc Companies.
    [Show full text]
  • Anna Halprin's Dance-Events
    AUTONOMY AS A TEMPORARY COLLECTIVE EXPERIENCE: ANNA HALPRIN’S DANCE-EVENTS, DEWEYAN AESTHETICS, AND THE EMERGENCE OF DIALOGICAL ART IN THE SIXTIES by Tusa Shea BA, University of Victoria, 2002 MA, University of Victoria, 2005 A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History in Art Tusa Shea, 2012 University of Victoria All rights reserved. This thesis may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without the permission of the author. Library and Archives Bibliothèque et Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de l'édition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-88455-3 Our file Notre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-88455-3 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant à la Bibliothèque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par télécommunication ou par l'Internet, prêter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des thèses partout dans le loan, distrbute and sell theses monde, à des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non- support microforme, papier, électronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriété du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protege cette thèse.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Oversight Manual
    Congressional Oversight Manual Frederick M. Kaiser Specialist in American National Government Walter J. Oleszek Senior Specialist in American National Government Todd B. Tatelman Legislative Attorney June 10, 2011 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL30240 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Congressional Oversight Manual Summary The Congressional Research Service (CRS) developed the Congressional Oversight Manual over 30 years ago, following a three-day December 1978 Workshop on Congressional Oversight and Investigations. The workshop was organized by a group of House and Senate committee aides from both parties and CRS at the request of the bipartisan House leadership. The Manual was produced by CRS with the assistance of a number of House committee staffers. In subsequent years, CRS has sponsored and conducted various oversight seminars for House and Senate staff and updated the Manual as circumstances warranted. The last revision occurred in 2007. Worth noting is the bipartisan recommendation of the House members of the 1993 Joint Committee on the Organization of Congress (Rept. No. 103-413, Vol. I): [A]s a way to further enhance the oversight work of Congress, the Joint Committee would encourage the Congressional Research Service to conduct on a regular basis, as it has done in the past, oversight seminars for Members and congressional staff and to update on a regular basis its Congressional Oversight Manual. Over the years, CRS has assisted many members, committees, party leaders, and staff aides in the performance of the oversight function, that is, the review, monitoring, and supervision of the implementation of public policy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Capitol Building
    CAPITOL VISITOR CENTER TEACHERTEACHER LLESSONESSON PLANLAN The Capitol BuildiNg Introduction The Capitol is among the most architecturally impressive and symbolically important buildings in the world. The Senate and the House of Representatives have met here for more than two centuries. Begun in 1793, the Capitol has been built, burnt, rebuilt, extended, and restored; today, it stands as a monument not only to its builders but also to the American people and their government. As George Washington said, public buildings in the Capitol city “in size, form, and elegance, should look beyond the present day.”1 This activity features images of the U.S. Capitol building — architectural plans and artistic renderings from its original design and subsequent expansion. Examining these images, students engage in class discussion and individual reflection, considering how a building itself might serve as a symbol and monument. Then, they draft images that capture their own interpretation of how a Capitol building should look. While intended for 8th grade students, the lesson can be adapted for other grade levels. 1 The Writings of George Washington from the Original Manuscript Sources, 1745–1799. John C. Fitzpatrick, Editor., Philadelphia, March 8, 1792. 1 TEACHER LESSON PLAN: THE CAPITOL BUILDING CAPITOL VISITOR CENTER TEACHER LESSON PLAN Estimated Time One to two class sessions National Standards National Standards for Civics and Government Content Standards, grades 5–8 II — What are the Foundations of the American Political System (D.1) United
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Legislative History
    EGAL RESEARCH GUIDE SERIES BASIC RESEARCH GUIDE # 2 FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE HISTORY THE GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY LAW SCHOOL JACOB BURNS LAW LIBRARY Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 2 I. Compiled Legislative Histories........................................................................................... 3 II. Locating a Bill Number (S. _____ or H.R. _____ ) ............................................................ 4 A. Find the Public Law Number and Statutes at Large Citation ................................. 4 B. Find the Bill Number .............................................................................................. 5 III. Legislative Analysis ............................................................................................................ 6 A. Congressional Research Service (CRS) Reports .................................................... 6 B. CQ Weekly .............................................................................................................. 6 IV. Locating Citations to Legislative History Documents ........................................................ 6 A. Legislation 1970 to Date: Online ............................................................................ 6 B. Pre-1970 Legislation: Print ..................................................................................... 8 V. Locating Legislative History Documents ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Capitol Dome
    THE CAPITOL DOME The Capitol in the Movies John Quincy Adams and Speakers of the House Irish Artists in the Capitol Complex Westward the Course of Empire Takes Its Way A MAGAZINE OF HISTORY PUBLISHED BY THE UNITED STATES CAPITOL HISTORICAL SOCIETYVOLUME 55, NUMBER 22018 From the Editor’s Desk Like the lantern shining within the Tholos Dr. Paula Murphy, like Peart, studies atop the Dome whenever either or both America from the British Isles. Her research chambers of Congress are in session, this into Irish and Irish-American contributions issue of The Capitol Dome sheds light in all to the Capitol complex confirms an import- directions. Two of the four articles deal pri- ant artistic legacy while revealing some sur- marily with art, one focuses on politics, and prising contributions from important but one is a fascinating exposé of how the two unsung artists. Her research on this side of can overlap. “the Pond” was supported by a USCHS In the first article, Michael Canning Capitol Fellowship. reveals how the Capitol, far from being only Another Capitol Fellow alumnus, John a palette for other artist’s creations, has been Busch, makes an ingenious case-study of an artist (actor) in its own right. Whether as the historical impact of steam navigation. a walk-on in a cameo role (as in Quiz Show), Throughout the nineteenth century, steam- or a featured performer sharing the marquee boats shared top billing with locomotives as (as in Mr. Smith Goes to Washington), the the most celebrated and recognizable motif of Capitol, Library of Congress, and other sites technological progress.
    [Show full text]
  • The Building As Completed, from Walter's Designs
    CHAPTER XVI THE BUILDING AS COMPLETED, FROM WALTER’S DESIGNS DWARD CLARK supervised the completion of the Capitol the old Senate Chamber being devoted to the court room and the west from the designs of Thomas U. Walter, leaving the building as front being used by the court officials for office and robing rooms.1 it stands to-day. The terraces on the west, north, and south are The attic story [Plate 223] is so arranged in each wing that the a part of the general landscape scheme of Frederick Law Olm- public has access from its corridors to the galleries of the House and Ested. The building consists of the central or old building, and two wings, Senate Chambers, with provision for the press and committee rooms or the Capitol extension, with the new Dome on the old building. facing the exterior walls of the building. Document rooms are also pro- The cellar [Plate 220] contained space on the central western vided on this floor. extension available for office and committee rooms. Other portions of Plates 224, 225, 225a show the eastern front of the building as the cellar are given up to the heating and ventilating apparatus, or are completed, the principal new features being the porticoes on the wings, used for storage. Beneath the center of the Dome a vault was built in which are similar to the central portico designed by Latrobe. Although the cellar to contain the remains of George Washington, but because of the original design of Thornton contemplated a central portico he did the objection of the family to his burial in the Capitol his body never not contemplate the broad flight of steps which extends to the ground rested in the contemplated spot.
    [Show full text]
  • Mass Deacidification of Library and Archive Materials
    Columbia University Libraries Mass Deacidification of Library and Archive Materials Final Report to the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation September 2009 Principal Investigator: James G. Neal Vice President for Information Services and University Librarian Columbia University 535 West 114th Street New York, New York 10027 212.854.2247 Grant Period: May 1, 2008-July 31, 2009 Reporting Period: May 1, 2008-July 31, 2009 Mass Deacidification of Library and Archive Materials Final Report to the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation Columbia University Libraries received an award of $27,500 in April 2008 from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation to support a survey and report of the need for the deacidification of newly acquired print volumes in major research libraries. The study group included members from CUR, NYU, Yale, and the Mellon Foundation. In March 2009, the Mellon Foundation approved a no-cost extension through July 31, 2009 to host the originally scheduled March planning meeting in April and to allow additional time for the university's account department to process and pay all expenses charged to the grant. The result is the attached report, Mass Deacidifcation: The Needfor a National Program. The principal investigator, Jim Neal, and Columbia's Offce of the Controller worked together to complete the Financial Report, which was signed and submitted directly from the Office of the Controller. As indicated in the Financial Report, this grant was underspent by $6,647 (including interest income of $198), primarily due to significant savings in travel costs. A check in the amount of $6,647 wil be refunded to the Mellon Foundation.
    [Show full text]
  • 051205 Congress Reform
    SPECIAL PRESENTATION “A PROPOSAL TO MAKE CONGRESS WORK AGAIN: A PANEL DISCUSSION ON PROPOSED CHANGES IN THE RULES AND PROCEDURES OF THE U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES” MODERATOR: SCOTT LILLY, SENIOR FELLOW, CENTER FOR AMERICAN PROGRESS FEATURING: REP. DAVID OBEY, (D-WI), RANKING MEMBER, COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS REP. BARNEY FRANK, (D-MA), RANKING MEMBER, COMMITTEE ON FINANCIAL SERVICES REP. DAVID PRICE, (D-NC), MEMBER, COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS REP. TOM ALLEN, (D-ME), MEMBER, COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND COMMERCE NORM ORNSTEIN, RESIDENT SCHOLAR, AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE; COAUTHOR, BROKEN BRANCH 12:00 PM – 1:30 PM MONDAY, DECEMBER 05, 2005 TRANSCRIPT PROVIDED BY DC TRANSCRIPTION & MEDIA REPURPOSING JOHN PODESTA: (In progress) – Center for American Progress. And I want to welcome you here for the presentation of “A Proposal to Make Congress Work Again.” I want to begin by welcoming our panelists. We’re joined, in addition to our senior fellow, Scott Lilly, by Congressman David Obey, Congressman Barney Frank, Congressman David Price, Congressman Tom Allen, and Norm Ornstein. I think that people on both sides of the aisle will join me in saying, in addition to these senior members and Norm, these are people who care about Congress, who care about the House, who indeed care about our democracy. And I think, as the title of this panel implies, “Making Congress Work Again” – I think it is clear that things on Capitol Hill, and I think particularly in the House of Representatives, have gotten seriously off-track. That’s why I think this package that these senior members have pulled together is so vital.
    [Show full text]
  • CAROLEE SCHNEEMANN B
    CAROLEE SCHNEEMANN b. 1939, Fox Chase, PA d. 2019, New Paltz, NY EDUCATION MFA, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois BA, Bard College, Annandale-On-Hudson, New York School of Painting and Sculpture, Columbia University, New York The New School for Social Research, New York La Universidad De Puebla, Mexico SOLO EXHIBITIONS 2022 Carolee Schneemann, Barbican Museum, London, UK (forthcoming) 2021 After Carolee: Tender and Fierce, Artpace, San Antonio, TX 2020 Liebeslust und Totentanz (Love’s Joy and Dance of Death), Bündner Kunstmuseum, Chur, Switzerland Off the Walls: Gifts from Professor John R. Robertson, Blanton Museum of Art, Austin, TX American Women: The Infinite Journey, La Patinoire Royale, galerie Valérie Bach, Saint-Gilles, Belgium All of Them Witches, curated by Dan Nadal and Laurie Simmons, Jeffrey Deitch, Los Angeles, CA Don’t Let this be Easy, Walker Art Center, Minneapolis, MN Barney, Scheemann, Shiraga, Tanaka, Fergus McCaffrey, Tokyo, Japan 2019 Carolee Schneeman, les Abattoirs, Toulouse, France Up to and Including Her Limits: After Carolee Schneemann, Museum Susch, Zernez, Switzerland Exhibition of Edition Works, Michele Didier, Paris, France Carolee Schneeman, mfc-michele Didier, Paris, France 2017 Kinetic Painting, Museum fur Moderne Kunst, Frankfurt, Germany; MoMA PS 1, Long Island City, NY More Wrong Things, Hales Gallery, London, United Kingdom 2016 Further Evidence – Exhibit A, P·P·O·W, New York, NY Further Evidence – Exhibit B, Galerie Lelong, New York, NY 2015 Kinetic Painting, Museum der Moderne Salzburg, Salzburg,
    [Show full text]