DOCSLIB.ORG

Art in the Stone Age the Dawn of Art Early Paleolithic Later Paleolithic 40,000-20,000 BCE 20,000-9000 BCE Paleolithic Period

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Art in the Stone Age the Dawn of Art Early Paleolithic Later Paleolithic 40,000-20,000 BCE 20,000-9000 BCE Paleolithic Period Art In the Stone Age The Dawn of art Early Paleolithic Later Paleolithic 40,000-20,000 BCE 20,000-9000 BCE Paleolithic Period No one knows why humans began to paint and carve images or what they meant to them. No one really knows the life our ancestor lead. However, we see that the subject of animals and female figures dominated their art during the Paleolithic period. Stone tools The development of stone tools allowed Paleolithic Diet early humans to create many new If i were an early human objects. what would i eat? ● Nuts ● Seeds ● Plans ● Fruit ● Vegetables ● Roots ● Grass ● Insects What is a Hunter and Gathers society? ● Fish ● Shellfish A hunter and gatherer society is a society where most or all food is ● Some meats obtained by forging. Early humans would collect wild plants, nuts, barriers and vegetables. Another source of food came from hunting animals. Medium- what is this object made of? Usually stone / earth materials. Ivory Technique- how is this object made? Sculpted or painted? size/ scale- how big or small is the object? Small (can be taken with Nomads.) Color-What is the color of the object? Earth Tone Texture- What is its texture? Does it appear smooth, bumpy or shinny? Many small female sculptures have been found dating from the old stone age. They range in different shapes and sizes. Some are made of mammoth tusk or bone while others are made of different types of stones. Some are relief sculptures while others are three dimensional. Venus of Willendorf , Austria, 28000-25,000 BC, Limestone The Venus of Willendorf is a small figurine made of Limestone. She was found in Willendorf, Austria in 1908. She is round in shape. The focus is on the body, particularly on the large breasts and stomach. Some believe she is wearing a reed hat on her head. Though at first glance it looks like she has no arms, they are actually resting above her breasts. Residue left on the stone suggest She once was painted red. Venus of Willendorf, Austria, 4.4 in, 25,000-28,000 BCE, Limestone What do we see? Exaggeration of human body. Large Breasts and hips. The sculpture is very small in size. The sculpture is yellowish brown in color. The figure has no face/ but there seems to be a representation of hair. Small or no feet knees facing inward. The Venus of Brassempouy is a very small ivory figurine of a female head. She was found in 2008 in a cave in Hohle Fels, in Germany Some art historians believe she is wearing a hat. Others, believe the lines on her head represent her hair. She is a rare example of a sculpture representing a female face - in contrast to the body being the main focus. Venus of Brassempouy/Head of Women, France,1.43 in 20,000-25,000 BCE,Ivory The Venus of Hohle Fels, is a type of small figurine made of mammoth ivory. She was found in 2008 in Hohle Fels, a cave near Schelklingen Germany. She is one of the oldest figurines. The focus of the figure is on the body, mostly the breasts and stomach area. Her head is very tiny! Venus of Hohle Fels Germany, 2.4 in,35,000- 40,000 BCE,Mammoth Ivory Relief sculpture The Venus of Laussel is a relief sculpture of a female nude holding what appears to be a bison horn. She is carved out of a limestone rock shelter. Residue on the stone suggest she was once painted red. There are many theories about the object she is holding, for one it was believed to be a crescent moon depicting the cycle of the moon. Now, it is believed to be a horn with markings that represent the cycles of a woman's menstrual period. Venus of Laussel/Woman Holding a Bison, France, 18.11in, 25,000- BCE, Limestone There are many similarities between the figures found, for one, they are solely female. Another, is that many are small in size. They are small enough to fit in someone's hand. Today, Historians debate that perhaps the figures would have been carried around by our nomadic ancestors. The figurines also have very exaggerated proportions. For example, large breasts, hips and stomachs. This may represent fertility. Lascaux Cave in France 16,000-14,000 BCE Outline/ contour Painting in the dark? -Light- large Fire/ animal fat Torches/ moss wicks -Drawing- Charcoal/ ash mixed with water. Earth tones made with crushed materials -Brushes- made from reeds/ sticks -Pallets- Made of stone -Bone tubes to blow paint onto walls Rhinoceros Wounded Man and Disemboweled Bison Lascaux Cave, France, 16,000-14,000 BCE Animal Facing to the left. What do we see? Perhaps a bull? Animal is outlined in a darkish color. The animal is in profile, however both of the animals horns are visible. (twisted perspective) There appears to be an overlapping of other images Color- earth tones / earth pigments. red/brown/black/ yellow Cave of Forgotten Dreams https://www.youtube.com/watch? v=NfF989-rW04 For homework watch the Cave of Forgotten dreams on youtube. The documentary is 1hr 30 mins long. After watching the film, please write a short paragraph. Answer some of these questions. 1. What do you think life was like for early humans? 2. What have we learned from these caves? 3. What are your favorite series of drawings? 4. Or explain the documentary to me in your own words. Human with Feline Head, from Hohlenstein Stadel Germany 40,000-35,000 BCE, Ivory Vocabulary: Paleolithic - Paleo- old Lithos- stone (old stone) Carbon Dating-Radiocarbon dating (also referred to as carbon dating or carbon-14 dating) is a method for determining the age of an object containing organic material by using the properties of radiocarbon, a radioactive isotope of carbon. Nomadic- moving from place to place in search of food and shelter. Hunter Gathers- A hunter and gatherer society is a society where most or all food is obtained by forging. Early humans would collect wild plants, nuts, barriers and vegetables. Another source of food came from hunting animals. Prehistoric- Prehistory, pre writing Earth tones- yellow, browns, blacks, reds,. Silhouette- the shadow or outline of something Contour line- a continuous line Ancient Near East Mesopotamia the Land Between two rivers Ancient Mesopotamia and Persia Mesopotamia is the presumed locale of the Biblical Garden of Eden and the region that gave birth to three of the worlds great modern faiths. Judaism, Islam and Christianity. This region of southwestern Asia in present-day Iraq, lying between the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers. The lands surrounding, were the site of the civilizations of Akkad, Sumer, Babylonia, and Assyria. Mesopotamia is the site of the earliest developments of the Neolithic Revolution from around 10,000 BCE. It has been identified as having "inspired some of the most important developments in human history including the invention of the wheel, the planting of the first cereal crops and the development of cursive script, mathematics, astronomy and agriculture". Table with Cuneiform writing Cuneiform was the writing system that was used in ancient Mesopotamia. The name translates to Wedge Shape. The Cuneiform writing system started with more complexed pictures however as time went one these images were simplified into more abstract symbols. The writing was mostly used as a way to mark down trades and accounting. Sumar White Temple, Uruk This is what it looks like today. Presentation of Offerings to Inanna(Warka Vase) 3200-3000 BCE made of Alabaster (3 feet, ¼ inches ) Inanna Goddess of fertility Naked men bringing offerings to this Goddess. (priests? Or just nude men) nude= signifying their humility. Important animals of Mesopotamia, this is the beginning of domestication of animals. They are male, followed by female=fertility Crops that are essential to the Sumerians of Mesopotamia. The Standard of Ur,From Tomb 779,Royal Cemetery Ur, Iraq 2600-2400 BCE, wooden box inlaid with Lapis Louzi and Red Limestone lapis lazuli Is a blue stone that if found in Afghanistan. War Side Peace Side Bull-Headed Harp. From the Tomb of Pu-abi , Iraq, 2600-2400 BCE, Hammered Gold Head (15 inch in height) What do we see? Akkad Head Of An Akkadian ruler, from Nineveb (modern Kuyunjik modern day Iraq) 2250-2200 BCE Victory Stele of Naram-Sin, 2254-2218 BCE, Pink Sandstone What do we see? Old babylon Code (laws) of Hammurabi Stele. 1780 Laws BCE If a man puts out the eye of another man, his eye shall be put out. If a married woman dies before bearing anny sons, her dowry shall be repaid to her father, but if she gives birth to sons her dowry shall belong to them. If a house builder builds a home and the home falls down and kills the family living inside, the builder must be put to death. If a man strikes a freeborn women so that she loses her unborn child, he shall pay ten shekels for her loss. If the woman is killed, his daughter must be put to death. Assyria Palace of Sargon 11 721-705 BCE Lamassu Man Headed Winged Bull from Citadel of Sargon. 721-705 BCE, carved from Monolithic piece of stone What do we see? Neo Babylon Ishtar Gate Babylon, Iraq 575 BCE Photoshop reconstruction of gate Detail of a lion found along the processional way from Ishtar Gate into the city of Babylon. The Ishtar Gate was constructed around 575 BC by King Nebuchadnezzar II of Babylon, made of fired bricks and decorated with animals made in glazed bricks.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Art in the Stone Age Terminology
    Art in the Stone Age Terminology ● Paleolithic- (Greek) ○ Paleo-Old ○ Lithos-Stone. ○ 40,000-9,000BCE ○ Characteristics, Hunter Gatherer, Caves. Migration ● Mesolithic, ○ Meso-Middle ○ Lithos- Stone Age ○ 10,000-5,000 bce ○ Characteristics, Beginnings of Cities, Dog Domestication, Transition to agricultural and animal domestication ● Neolithic, ○ Neo-New ○ Lithos-Stone ○ 8,000-2300 BCE ○ Development of Cities, Animal Husbandry Herding, Agriculture, People Began to stay in one place Mistakes in Art History The saying Goes.. “History is Written by the victors.” Niccolo Machiavelli Mercator Map Projection. https://youtu.be/KUF_Ckv8HbE http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo- way/2016/01/21/463835225/discovery-of- ancient-massacre-suggests-war-predated- settlements Radio Carbon Dating https://youtu.be/54e5Bz7m3do A process Archaeologists use among others to estimate how long ago an artifact was made. Makapansgat Face Pebble resembling a face, Makapansgat, ca. 3,000,000 bce. This pebble of one of the earliest examples of representation of the human form. Apollo 11 Cave Animal facing left, from the Apollo 11 Cave, Namibia, ca. 23,000bce. Charcoal on stone, 5”x4.25”. State Museum of Namibia, Windhoek. Scientists between 1969-1972 scientists working in the Apollo 11 Cave in Namibia found seven fragments of painted stone plaques, transportable. The approximate date of the charcoal from the archeological layer containing the Namibian plaques is 23,000bce. Hohlenstein-Stadel Human with feline (Lion?) head, from Hohlenstein-Stadel Germany, ca 40,000- 35,000BCE Appox 12” in length this artifact was carved from ivory from a mammoth tusk This object was originally thought to be of 30,000bce, was pushed back in time due to additional artifacts found later on the same excavation layer.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstracts of Reports and Posters
    Abstracts of Reports and Posters Amira Adaileh The Magdalenian site of Bad Kösen-Lengefeld The open air site of Bad Kösen-Lengefeld is located in Sachsen-Anhalt, Eastern Germany. It was discov- ered in the mid 1950´s in the immediate vicinity of the famous Magdalenian site of Saaleck. Since that time, archaeologists collected over 2000 lithic artifacts during systematical surveys. The technological and typological analyses of the lithic artifacts confirmed the assignment of Bad Kösen-Lengefeld to a late Magdalenian. Furthermore, the investigation of the surface collections brought forward information about the character of this camp site, the duration of its occupation and the pattern of raw material procure- ment. The fact that Bad Kösen-Lengefeld is located in a region with more than 100 Magdalenian sites fostered a comparison of the lithic inventory with other Magdalenian assemblages. Thus, allowing to spec- ify the position of the Lengefeld collection within the chorological context of the Magdalenian in Eastern Germany. Jehanne Affolter, Ludovic Mevel Raw material circulation in northern french alps and Jura during lateglacial interstadial : method, new data and paleohistoric implication Since fifteen years the study of the characterization and origin of flint resources used by Magdalenian and Azilian groups in northern French Alps and Jura have received significant research work. Diverse and well distributed spatially, some of these resources were used and disseminated throughout the late Upper Paleolithic. Which changes do we observe during the Magdalenian then for the Azilian? The results of petrographic analysis and techno-economic analysis to several archaeological sites allow us to assess dia- chronic changes in economic behavior of these people and discuss the significance of these results.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Large-Scale Mitogenomic Analysis
    Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2019 Large-scale mitogenomic analysis of the phylogeography of the Late Pleistocene cave bear Gretzinger, Joscha ; Molak, Martyna ; Reiter, Ella ; Pfrengle, Saskia ; Urban, Christian ; Neukamm, Judith ; Blant, Michel ; Conard, Nicholas J ; Cupillard, Christophe ; Dimitrijević, Vesna ; Drucker, Dorothée G ; Hofman-Kamińska, Emilia ; Kowalczyk, Rafał ; Krajcarz, Maciej T ; Krajcarz, Magdalena ; Münzel, Susanne C ; Peresani, Marco ; Romandini, Matteo ; Rufí, Isaac ; Soler, Joaquim ; Terlato, Gabriele ; Krause, Johannes ; Bocherens, Hervé ; Schuenemann, Verena J Abstract: The cave bear (Ursus spelaeus) is one of the Late Pleistocene megafauna species that faced extinction at the end of the last ice age. Although it is represented by one of the largest fossil records in Europe and has been subject to several interdisciplinary studies including palaeogenetic research, its fate remains highly controversial. Here, we used a combination of hybridisation capture and next generation sequencing to reconstruct 59 new complete cave bear mitochondrial genomes (mtDNA) from 14 sites in Western, Central and Eastern Europe. In a Bayesian phylogenetic analysis, we compared them to 64 published cave bear mtDNA sequences to reconstruct the population dynamics and phylogeography dur- ing the Late Pleistocene. We found five major mitochondrial DNA lineages resulting in a noticeably more complex biogeography of the European lineages during the last 50,000 years than previously assumed. Furthermore, our calculated effective female population sizes suggest a drastic cave bear population de- cline starting around 40,000 years ago at the onset of the Aurignacian, coinciding with the spread of anatomically modern humans in Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Musical Origins and the Stone Age Evolution of Flutes
    Musical Origins and the Stone Age Evolution of Flutes When we, modern humans, emerged from Africa and colonized Europe Jelle Atema 45,000 years ago, did we have flutes in fist and melodies in mind? Email: [email protected] Introduction Music is an intensely emotional subject and the origins of music have fascinated Postal: people for millennia, going back to early historic records. An excellent review can Boston University be found in “Dolmetsch Online” (http://www.dolmetsch.com/musictheory35. Biology Department htm). Intense debates in the late 19th and early 20th century revolved around the 5 Cummington Street origins of speech and music and which came first. Biologist Charles Darwin, befit- Boston, MA 02215 ting his important recognition of evolution by sexual selection, considered that music evolved as a courtship display similar to bird song; he also felt that speech derived from music. Musicologist Spencer posited that music derived from the emotional content of human speech. The Darwin–Spencer debate (Kivy, 1959) continues unresolved. During the same period the eminent physicist Helmholtz- following Aristotle-studied harmonics of sound and felt that music distinguished itself from speech by its “fixed degree in the scale” (Scala = stairs, i.e. discrete steps) as opposed to the sliding pitches (“glissando”) typical of human speech. As we will see, this may not be such a good distinction when analyzing very early musi- cal instruments with our contemporary bias toward scales. More recent symposia include “The origins of music” (Wallin et al., 2000) and “The music of nature and the nature of music” (Gray et al., 2001).
    [Show full text]
  • Homo Aestheticus’
    Conceptual Paper Glob J Arch & Anthropol Volume 11 Issue 3 - June 2020 Copyright © All rights are reserved by Shuchi Srivastava DOI: 10.19080/GJAA.2020.11.555815 Man and Artistic Expression: Emergence of ‘Homo Aestheticus’ Shuchi Srivastava* Department of Anthropology, National Post Graduate College, University of Lucknow, India Submission: May 30, 2020; Published: June 16, 2020 *Corresponding author: Shuchi Srivastava, Assistant Professor, Department of Anthropology, National Post Graduate College, An Autonomous College of University of Lucknow, Lucknow, India Abstract Man is a member of animal kingdom like all other animals but his unique feature is culture. Cultural activities involve art and artistic expressions which are the earliest methods of emotional manifestation through sign. The present paper deals with the origin of the artistic expression of the man, i.e. the emergence of ‘Homo aestheticus’ and discussed various related aspects. It is basically a conceptual paper; history of art begins with humanity. In his artistic instincts and attainments, man expressed his vigour, his ability to establish a gainful and optimistictherefore, mainlyrelationship the secondary with his environmentsources of data to humanizehave been nature. used for Their the behaviorsstudy. Overall as artists findings was reveal one of that the man selection is artistic characteristics by nature suitableand the for the progress of the human species. Evidence from extensive analysis of cave art and home art suggests that humans have also been ‘Homo aestheticus’ since their origins. Keywords: Man; Art; Artistic expression; Homo aestheticus; Prehistoric art; Palaeolithic art; Cave art; Home art Introduction ‘Sahityasangeetkalavihinah, Sakshatpashuh Maybe it was the time when some African apelike creatures to 7 million years ago, the first human ancestors were appeared.
    [Show full text]
  • Paleolithic 3 Million + 10,000 BCE
    The Rupture “This is where we should look for the earliest origins, long before the age of metals, because it was about 300,000 years ago that the “fire pit” was starting to be utilized with some stone, wood and bone.. Silo - 2004 Paleolithic 3 Million + 10,000 BCE The term Paleolithic refers to the « Old Stone Age » The Paleolithic period begins with the first evidence of human technology (stone tools) more than three million years ago, and ends with major changes in human societies instigated by the invention of agriculture and animal domestication. Paleolithic, Lower, Middle and Upper Lower Paleolithic 3 Million + - 300,000 BCE the Lower Paleolithic, from the earliest human presence (Homo antecessor and Homo heidelbergensis) to the Holstein interglacial, c. 1.4 to 0.3 million years ago. Middle Paleolithic 300,000 – 40,000 BCE the Middle Paleolithic, marked by the presence of Neanderthals, 300,000 to 40,000 years ago Upper Paleolithic 45,000 – 12,000 BCE the Upper Paleolithic, c. 45,000 to 12,000 years ago, marked by the arrival of anatomically modern humans and extending throughout the Last Glacial Maximum The Aurignacian Period – 40,000-28,000 BCE • The Aurignacian cultural tradition is generally accepted as the first modern humans in Europe. • During this period an explosion of sudden and innovative changes take place. People begin to use musical instruments which indicates possible ceremony, ritual and dance. Plus all forms of art appears at this time which signifies the full emergence of modern symbolic expression. • The most significant development in stone tool making is the refinement of the manufacture of blades struck off conical cores or nuculi.
    [Show full text]
  • A Female Figurine from the Basal Aurignacian of Hohle Fels Cave in Southwestern Germany
    Vol 459 | 14 May 2009 | doi:10.1038/nature07995 LETTERS A female figurine from the basal Aurignacian of Hohle Fels Cave in southwestern Germany Nicholas J. Conard1 Despite well over 100 years of research and debate, the origins of art dimensions. Four fragments were recovered in connection with water remain contentious1–3. In recent years, abstract depictions have screening and can be localized to a 10-l volume corresponding to a ,3- been documented at southern African sites dating to 75 kyr before cm-thick portion of a quarter metre.The pieces of the figurine lay about present (BP)4,5, and the earliest figurative art, which is often seen as 3 m below the current surface of the cave in an area about 20 m from the an important proxy for advanced symbolic communication, has cave’s entrance. All of the finds come from the southwest quadrant of a been documented in Europe as dating to between 30 and single square metre and were recovered from within 12 cm in the 40 kyr BP2. Here I report the discovery of a female mammoth-ivory vertical dimension (Fig. 2). Although, owing to their fragility and com- figurine in the basal Aurignacian deposit at Hohle Fels Cave in the plex depositional histories, many of the ivory artworks from the Swabian Jura of southwestern Germany during excavations in Swabian Jura are highly fragmentary, the Venus from Hohle Fels is 2008. This figurine was produced at least 35,000 calendar years nearly complete; only the left arm and shoulder are missing. The excel- ago, making it one of the oldest known examples of figurative art.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Archaeological Science 90 (2018) 71E91
    Journal of Archaeological Science 90 (2018) 71e91 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Archaeological Science journal homepage: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jas Bears and humans, a Neanderthal tale. Reconstructing uncommon behaviors from zooarchaeological evidence in southern Europe Matteo Romandini a, b, Gabriele Terlato b, c, Nicola Nannini b, d, Antonio Tagliacozzo e, * Stefano Benazzi a, b, Marco Peresani b, a Dipartimento di Beni Culturali, Universita di Bologna, Via degli Ariani 1, 48121 Ravenna, Italy b Universita degli Studi di Ferrara, Dipartimento di Studi Umanistici, Sezione di Scienze Preistoriche e Antropologiche, Corso Ercole I d’Este, 32, Ferrara, Italy c Area de Prehistoria, Universitat Rovira i Virgili (URV), Avinguda de Catalunya 35, 43002 Tarragona, Spain d MuSe - Museo delle Scienze, Corso del Lavoro e della Scienza 3, IT 38123, Trento, Italy e Polo Museale del Lazio, Museo Nazionale Preistorico Etnografico “L. Pigorini”, Sezione di Bioarcheologia, Piazzale G. Marconi 14, I-00144 Rome, Italy article info abstract Article history: Cave bear (Ursus spelaeus), brown bear (Ursus arctos), and Neanderthals were potential competitors for Received 6 January 2017 environmental resources (shelters and food) in Europe. In order to reinforce this view and contribute to Received in revised form the ongoing debate on late Neanderthal behavior, we present evidence from zooarchaeological and 7 November 2017 taphonomic analyses of bear bone remains discovered at Rio Secco Cave and Fumane Cave in northeast Accepted
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of Paleoanthropological Discoveries in German-Speaking Nations
    Anderson 1 Dylan Anderson Carol Pannocione German 30 September 2019 Behold, der Mann: Survey of Paleoanthropological Discoveries in German-Speaking Nations 1. Introduction The German world, with its turbulent and important history from almost 600,000 years ago to this day, is immensely important to the study of humankind; from then and now. Fossils allow us a glimpse at the early inhabitants of Europe and Germany; tools allow us to see how our ancestors would have survived; and art allows us to see the symbolic capabilities of our ancestors. 2. Fossils and Tools Understanding and researching human prehistory is difficult due to the sheer volume of information. Moreover, there are few tools to examine said prehistory, with dental, isotopic, and mitochondrial analysis being some of the more recent tools. Early tools to examine prehistory would have been fossil analysis, stratigraphy, and comparative anatomy. 2.1. Neandertal 1 Neandertal 1 are a set of bones belonging to an extinct species of hominins now known as Homo sapiens neandertalensis. This was not the first Neandertal found, nor the first Neandertal discovered in the German world, but it was the first fossil to be named as Neandertal. After being discovered in 1856, the fossil was promptly given to local German teacher and naturalist Johann Carl Fuhlrott. Fuhlrott, along with German anatomist Hermann Schaaffhausen, published a joint Anderson 2 paper in 1857 in a German society for natural history posited that the skull belonged to a new species related to humans (Schaaffhausen, 1857). Their views were the subject of intense scholarly debate. At the time, the biological sciences were dominated by German cellular biologist Rudolf Virchow, who despised the theory of evolution and claimed Neandertal 1 was a human with a serious deformation (Glick, 1988).
    [Show full text]
  • Iron, Steel and Swords Script - Page 1
    Venus Figurines There are plenty of so-called Venus figurines. My Suebian ancestoress seems to be the oldest (and ugliest) of the bunch Just for the hell of it, here is a gallery of stone-age beauties. The ceramic one mentioned in the text is here. Here is a little table of what's around (partially adopted from Wikipedia). There are several more Venus figurines around, however, and many are probably patiently waiting for that good-looking archeologist to dig them out. Check this link for plenty of additional information and pictures: Don's Map; http://www.donsmaps.com/index.html. Some of the pictures following are from this site. Name Approx. age Location Material (x 1000 years) Hidden Venus of Hohle Fels 35–40 Suebian Alb, Germany Mammoth ivory Venus of Galgenberg 30 Lower Austria Serpentine rock Venus of Dolní Vestonice 27–31 Moravia, Czech Republic Ceramic Venus of Lespugue 24–26 French Pyrenees Ivory Venus of Willendorf 24–26 Lower Austria Limestone Venus of Mal'ta 23 Irkutsk Oblast, Russia Ivory Venus of Moravany 23 Záhorie, Slovakia Mammoth ivory Venus of Brassempouy 22 Aquitaine, France Mammoth ivory Venus of Laussel 20 Dordogne, France Limestone relief Venus' of Avdeevo 20 - 21 Switzerland Black jet Venus of Monruz 11 Near Kursk; Russia ivory Venus of Catal Huyuk 7.7 Turkey Clay (?) Suebian Venus of Hohle Fels Iron, Steel and Swords script - Page 1 Venus of Galgenberg Ceramic Venus of Dolní Vestonice Iron, Steel and Swords script - Page 2 Venus of Lespugue Venus of Willendorf Venus of Malta Iron, Steel and Swords script - Page 3 Venus of Moravany Venus of Brassempouy Venus of Laussel Iron, Steel and Swords script - Page 4 Venus' of Avdeevo Venus of Monruz Iron, Steel and Swords script - Page 5 Relatively recent "Venus" from Catal Huyuk; usually perceived as (birthing) Godess (Head restored) Finally, two modern versions.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Paleolithic Art: a Creative Teaching Tool Ginger L
    Regis University ePublications at Regis University All Regis University Theses Summer 2010 Upper Paleolithic Art: a Creative Teaching tool Ginger L. Trovik Regis University Follow this and additional works at: https://epublications.regis.edu/theses Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons Recommended Citation Trovik, Ginger L., "Upper Paleolithic Art: a Creative Teaching tool" (2010). All Regis University Theses. 461. https://epublications.regis.edu/theses/461 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by ePublications at Regis University. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Regis University Theses by an authorized administrator of ePublications at Regis University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Regis University College for Professional Studies Graduate Programs Final Project/Thesis Disclaimer Use of the materials available in the Regis University Thesis Collection (“Collection”) is limited and restricted to those users who agree to comply with the following terms of use. Regis University reserves the right to deny access to the Collection to any person who violates these terms of use or who seeks to or does alter, avoid or supersede the functional conditions, restrictions and limitations of the Collection. The site may be used only for lawful purposes. The user is solely responsible for knowing and adhering to any and all applicable laws, rules, and regulations relating or pertaining to use of the Collection. All content in this Collection is owned by and subject to the exclusive control of Regis University and the authors of the materials. It is available only for research purposes and may not be used in violation of copyright laws or for unlawful purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • FROM ARTIFACT to ICON: an Analysis of the Venus Figurines in Archaeological Literature and Contemporary Culture
    Durham E-Theses From artifact to icon: an analysis of the Venus gurines in archaeological literature and contemporary culture Lander, Louise Muriel How to cite: Lander, Louise Muriel (2005) From artifact to icon: an analysis of the Venus gurines in archaeological literature and contemporary culture, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/3027/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 FROM ARTIFACT TO ICON: An Analysis of the Venus Figurines in Archaeological Literature and Contemporary Culture Volume 5 of5 Louise Muriel Lander A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Durham Department of Archaeology 2004 A copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be published without his prior written consent and information derived from it should be acknowledged.
    [Show full text]