Distress Clauses in Mortgages," but Is Fresh Substance

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Distress Clauses in Mortgages, 250 DISTRESS CLAUSES. This paper is not a re-serving of the book " Distress Clauses in Mortgages," but is fresh substance. It deals with the subject under the following headings : Part 1-Recourse Against Chattels . Part 2.-Miscellaneous. Part 3.-Eviction. PART I-RECOURSE AGAINST CHATTELS. Two Kinds of Distress Clauses . Distress clauses in mortgages and agreements for sale are of two kinds, namely : (1) Attornment clauses, to the relationship of landlord and ten- ant created by which the common law right of distress for arrears of rent is an incident, and, (2) Licenses to distrain, by which the mortgagor or purchaser specifically grants to the mortgagee or vendor, power, in case of default, to enter upon the land and by distress warrant to recover arrears under the mortgage or agreement, in the same manner as rent. Legislative Restriction . The earliest Manitoba legislation expressly restricting distress rights of mortgagees of land is sec. I of 1884, Man ., c. 27 . This is intituled "An Act respecting Distress for rent and interest upon Mortgages," and appears to be the first Distress Act passed in Mani- toba . The Journals of the Legislative Assembly show that section 1 of the Bill as introduced was as follows : " 1. From and after the first day of January, A.D. 1885, the right of (landlords and) mortgagees to distrain for (rent or) interest due upon mort- gages ; shall be limited to the goods and chattels of the (tenant or) mortgagor only, and as to such goods and chattels, only to such as are not exempt from seizure under execution ." and that in Committee of the whole House the words within brackets were deleted, and that upon the Speaker resuming the Chair the sec- tion, as so altered, was passed and received the Royal Assent . April, 1927] Distress Clauses. '25 1 Cases on the Legislation. This provision, which originated in Manitoba, was duplicated in Ontario in 1886. In Edmonds v. Phe Hamilton Provident and Loan Society;,- the majority of the Court held the section to be applicable to every case of a mortgagee distraining; whether under a license or under an attornment clause, but in Linstead v. Hamilton Provident and Loan Society,2 the late Mr. justice Killam held it to extend only to distraints under license and stated his conjecture to be that the Legislature had in mind only the usual proviso in the form of mort- gage-deed composing the .second schedule of 'The Short Forms Act. This proviso is the present covenant No. 14 in the form and, in the - short style, reads " Provided that the mortgagee may distrain for arrears of interest." This proviso is a mere contractual license to distrain and does not create the relationship of landlord and tenant. It was along with the rest ôf the form copied by the Manitoba Legislature from " An Act respecting short forms of Mortgages in Upper Canada," 1864, c . 3l . The Manitoba decision is to be preferred, because the late Mr. justice Killam sat in the Legislature in 1884 at the time of enact- anent of the Distress Act provision in question, and was one of the principal debaters on the, Bill and is accordingly to be taken to have known pretty well, what the section meant. Master-in-Chambers. Clarry, of Alberta, in Confederation Life Association v. Wood,3 pre-; ferred the Ontario decision, as did also the majority of the Court en banc in Vousden v. Hopper et al,4 but possibly this was out of' lack of knowledge of, the intimate acquaintance Mr. justice Killam . had with the section. .- Amendment of the Legislation. By 1921,'Man., c. 14, s. 1, the section under consideration was . changed to read as follows : " 2. The right of mortgagees and vendors of land under' agreements of sale to distrain for interest or for rent claimed to be due under any relationship of landlord and tenant created by the mortgage or agreement of sale shall be limited to the goods and chattels of the môrtgagor or purchaser only, and as. to such goods and chattels to such. only as are not exempt from seizure under execution." (1891) 18 O.A.R. 347. (1896) 11 Man. R. 199. °(1922) 1 W.W.R. 766. '(1911) 4 Sask. L.R. 1 ; 16. W.L.R. 294. 252 The Canadian Bar Review . [No. IV Distress Clauses v. Chattel Mortgages. Such is the present form of the section, and a question which arises is : Can goods upon which the mortgagor or purchaser has given a chattel mortgage be said to continue to be his goods and chattels and distrainable under the attornment clause? Distress Act section 5, first passed in this Province in 1596, pro- vides that a landlord shall not distrain for rent on goods and chattels the property of any person except the tenant or person who is liable for the rent, but that this restriction shall not apply in favour of any person whose title is derived by purchase, gift, transfer, or assign- ment from the tenant, whether absolute or in trust, or by way of mortgage or otherwise. If the effect of the section limiting distress rights under attorn- ment clauses to goods and chattels of the mortgagor or purchaser be that landlords under such clauses are not entitled to the benefits of the reservations in section 5, then such landlords will largely have to rely upon the fact that although at law ownership of mortgaged goods is in the chattel mortgagee, in the view of equity the property is in the mortgagor subject to but a charge in favour of the chattel morgtagee. The following cases directly touch the question of the respective rights of a chattel mortgagee and a mortgagee or vendor of the land upon which the goods are situate : McDermott v. Fraser,5 McDougall & Secord Ltd. v. Merchants Bank of Canada,6 In re Lake Winnipeg Navigation Company Limited, Northern Trust Company's Claim, 7 In re Larratt and Canadian Bank of Commerce," The Queensland Mortgage and Agency Company,. Limited, v. The British and Aus- tralasian Trust & Loa-it Company, Limited.9 In the Queensland case, Edmund Dalton, a sheep-rancher, had given to the plaintiff a chattel mortgage upon the sheep and after- ward, to the defendant, a land mortgage upon the ranch and the latter mortgage contained an attornment under which seizure had been made of a number of the sheep for arrears of rent under the clause. The Court of three judges which heard the case delivered opinions holding the distraint to have been without justification as against the mortgagee of the sheep. The reasoning of the Court may be sum- marized as follows : 5 (1915) 25 Man. R. 298 ; 8 W.W.R. 196 ; 119151 23 D.L.R. 430. (1920) 1 W.W.R. 364; (1919) 1 W.W.R. 830 ; 119201 51 D.L.R. 309. 1 0921) 2 C.B.R. 380. '(1923) 1 W.W.R. 875 ; 119231 1 D.L.R. 1141. °(1887) 3Q.L.J.R.4. April, 1927] Distress Clauses. 253 Registration of the chattel mortgage constituted notice of it to all persons who might afterward deal with the sheep or with mat- ters which might involve the sheep. Accordingly, the defendant `must be taken to have known that to accept from the rancher a mortgage containing a right of distress under an attornment clause would be to assist him to purport to derogate from his prior grant to- the plaintiff. The law could not, allow such derogation to be effective. Under the chattel mortgage, the plaintiff had acquired not only security upon the sheep, but also, necessarily, an implied easement in the land for their pasturage. One proposing to buy or to take a mortgage upon land in a grazing country, if he would protect him- self, should first search and see whether there are any subsisting ights of this kind. Moreover, as the attornment clause was in effect a security over already mortgaged sheep, it came within the 31 st section of The Mercantile Act of 1867, which forbade the granting of a further mortgage upon already mortgaged sheep without the consent of the subsisting mortgagee . Share-crop Attornment Clauses. The benefits of The Crop Payments Act, of Manitoba, now expressly extend to attornments at a rental -of a share of the crop. This is by virtue of an amendment passed last year, namely, 1925, Man. c. 12. Previously, there was room for doubt that this was the position. That there should be such doubt was unsatisfactory, because it frequently happens that the share-crop form of tenancy best suits a particular case, from the standpoint of the person farm- ing the land, as well as from that of the other party. Insertion of share-crop attornments is becoming more common as time goes on. One at least of the banks has its own printed farm mortgage form, the attornment in which is at a share-crop rental ; and a certain company which has extensive land holdings in the West incorpor- ated in a recent revision of its standard form of money-payment agreement for sale the following attornment clause and license to distrain, namely : "And for the better securing the payment of the moneys-payable here- under, the purchaser doth attorn and become tenant to the Company of the said land from the date hereof until the-happening of default hereunder at a yearly rental equivalent to the annual interest secured hereby, to be paid on each day herein appointed for the payment of interest, but, from and after the occurrence of such default, from year to year at a rental of one-third of all crops grown upon the said land in each year without any exemption or 254 The Canadian Bar Review.
Recommended publications
  • LIS > Legislative Draft > 12104240D
    VIRGINIA ACTS OF ASSEMBLY -- 2019 SESSION CHAPTER 712 An Act to amend and reenact §§ 54.1-2345 through 54.1-2354 of the Code of Virginia; to amend the Code of Virginia by adding in Title 1 a chapter numbered 6, containing sections numbered 1-600 through 1-610, by adding in Chapter 3 of Title 8.01 an article numbered 13.1, containing sections numbered 8.01-130.1 through 8.01-130.13, and an article numbered 15.1, containing sections numbered 8.01-178.1 through 8.01-178.4, by adding in Title 8.01 a chapter numbered 18.1, containing articles numbered 1 and 2, consisting of sections numbered 8.01-525.1 through 8.01-525.12, by adding in Title 32.1 a chapter numbered 20, containing sections numbered 32.1-373, 32.1-374, and 32.1-375, by adding in Title 36 a chapter numbered 12, containing sections numbered 36-171 through 36-175, by adding in Title 45.1 a chapter numbered 14.7:3, containing sections numbered 45.1-161.311:9, 45.1-161.311:10, and 45.1- 161.311:11, by adding a section numbered 54.1-2345.1, by adding in Chapter 23.3 of Title 54.1 an article numbered 2, containing sections numbered 54.1-2354.1 through 54.1-2354.5, by adding a title numbered 55.1, containing a subtitle numbered I, consisting of chapters numbered 1 through 5, containing sections numbered 55.1-100 through 55.1-506, a subtitle numbered II, consisting of chapters numbered 6 through 11, containing sections numbered 55.1-600 through 55.1-1101, a subtitle numbered III, consisting of chapters numbered 12 through 17, containing sections numbered 55.1-1200 through 55.1-1703,
    [Show full text]
  • Deed of Conveyance of Land in Kentucky Lyman Chalkley University of Kentucky
    Kentucky Law Journal Volume 1 | Issue 3 Article 2 1913 Deed of Conveyance of Land in Kentucky Lyman Chalkley University of Kentucky Follow this and additional works at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/klj Part of the Property Law and Real Estate Commons Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits you. Recommended Citation Chalkley, Lyman (1913) "Deed of Conveyance of Land in Kentucky," Kentucky Law Journal: Vol. 1 : Iss. 3 , Article 2. Available at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/klj/vol1/iss3/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Kentucky Law Journal by an authorized editor of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Kentucky Law Journal where the prospective law student may receive his preparatory work before beginning the study of law. We have strong Law Schools within our State where the proper training in law can be had, and for those who may not attend a Law School, there can be found in most every county, well trained lawyers who are willing to give of their time and learning, to properly teach such students, to enable them to meet the requirements for admission to the bar. When Kentucky builds up this branch of learning the whole educa- tional scheme will take on the appearance of modern progress. This branch of learning is the last to start. It should have been the first. It should be advanced from the rear ranks to the foremost position which is the proper place for the lawyer.
    [Show full text]
  • English Property Reform and Its American Aspects
    YALE LAW JOURNAL Vol.XXXVII NOVEMBER, 1927 No. I ENGLISH PROPERTY REFORM AND ITS AMERICAN ASPECTS P Ocy BORDWELL "In England men are rated by their income, in the United States by their principal." Such was the remark of an American officer returning from the World War. In that remark lies the explanation of much of the difference between property condi- tions in England and in the United States. Settled property is the rule in England. It is the exception in the United States. It is traditional for the Englishman to make provision for the marri- age and the fruits of the marriage before the marriage takes place. To the romantic American the adherence to this custom in international marriages has seemed coldblooded and calculat- ing. On the other hand it has been said of the Englishman that to him it would seem almost as immoral to do away with the marriage settlement as with marriage itself., And when the oldest son attains his majority or wishes to marry, provision is made for the third generation by means of a settlement. This is so much a part of English life that those who shaped the recent reform of property law in England could not have changed it if they would. Nor would they if they could. The strict family settlement may disappear and the trust for sale take its place, but in the one form or the other settled property will continue to characterize English life. The great problem in England has been how to reconcile this provision for the needs of future generations with free trade in land.
    [Show full text]
  • The Conveyance of Estates in Fee by Deed : Being a Statemennt of the Principles of Law Involved in the Drafting and Interpretati
    CHAPTER II. THE CHIEF METHODS OF VOLUNTARY ALIENATION OF LAND INTER VIVOS . § 11. Formerly no writing neces - $ 15 . Deeds used though not nec sary — The feoffment. essary . 12 . The bargain and sale - When 16. Livery of seisin in the United deed necessary for. States - Conveyance gen 13 . The lease and release . erally by deed. 14 . The feoffment - When a deed 17. How title may still pass in became necessary for . ter vivos without writing . 18. Fines and recoveries . Formerly writing necessary § 11 . no — The feoffment . Owing to repeated allusions in modern statutes and opin ions to earlier law a brief view of former methods of trans ferring interests in real property will be found to be not only interesting , but of practical importance . From the Norman Conquest, 1066 , onward for a period of over four hundred and sixty years no writing of any kind was necessary for the legal transfer of a freehold es tate in possession in corporeal hereditaments . Such transfer was accomplished generally by “ the most valuable of assurances ” - the feoffment . This consists simply and solely in livery of seisin , that is the deliv ery by the feoffor to the feoffee of possession of the land : “ Some phrases in common use , which seem to imply a distinction between the feoffment and the livery are so far incorrect ." 1 Challis , Real Prop., ch . 28 . As to the conveyance of those interests in land that could not be transferred at common law by feoffment, i. e., incorporeal interests , see post $ 242 . ( 11 ) 12 THE LAW OF CONVEYANCING . § 12 § 12 . The bargain and sale — When deed necessary for.
    [Show full text]
  • Real Property Lease Assignment
    Real Property Lease Assignment Traveled and scavenging Darien never individuating acrostically when Pepillo chink his lupin. Levy still mark inoffensively while pleasurable Maison nibbed that depressants. Owen veneer plain if mnemic Redford adjudicating or staving. What should a real estate under this opinion raises a real property lease assignment or indirectly assign this website uses akismet to. The Assignment of Lease is his title document also referring to the process itself write all rights that a lessee or tenant possesses over her property are transferred to boy party. Real Property LAWS604 Lecture 4 Assignment of Leases and Covenants Nature demand a lease capital lease for an estate in send It is exist at the or external equity. In ownership of the portion of the constant subject perhaps the leases with a. In substitute case hire an assignment of intake the assignor is arrange to feeling up on property rights and population be relieved of any obligations to the property to payment. Assigning a measure in New York Caretaker. The real property under this section shall provide certain real property? It can we are you pay taxes upon assignee stating that allows for certain interests in detail what is assumed all future rent a real property lease assignment. Issues and profits coming was under most lease mortgage the place of. In short with an assignment both assignor and assignee are relevant under different lease. ASSIGNMENT OF LEASE. Recapture Clause Definition Investopedia. Unlike an ordinary assignment a bankruptcy assignment will. While most cases deal often the distinction real property lawyers are all aware that between an assignment and a sublease it is necessary to keep in sense what.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of the Statute of Uses and Its Effects on English Law Timothy L
    University of Richmond UR Scholarship Repository Honors Theses Student Research 1981 The evolution of the statute of uses and its effects on English Law Timothy L. Martin Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.richmond.edu/honors-theses Part of the History Commons, and the Law Commons Recommended Citation Martin, Timothy L., "The ve olution of the statute of uses and its effects on English Law" (1981). Honors Theses. 1064. https://scholarship.richmond.edu/honors-theses/1064 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Research at UR Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of UR Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE EVOLUTION OF THE STATUTE OF USES AND ITS EFFECTS ON ENGLISH LAW A THESIS Presented by Timothy L. Martin To Dr. John Rilling Professor of British History For Completion of the Honors History Program May 1, 1981 LtSRARV Df.iTVERSITY OF RICHMOND VIRGINIA 23173 THE DEVELOPME�\JT OF THE ENGLISH USE FROM THE CONQUEST TO THE REIGN OF HENRY VIII The Norman Conquest (1066) signified a new epoch in the evolution of the law of succession of real property in England. The introduction of the Norman brand of feudalism necessitated a revision in the primitive Anglo-Saxon mode o f succession.. 1 The feudal system was necessarily dependent upon a stable chain of land ownership, and thus, the principle of primogeniture emerged as the dominant form of land convey- ance. 2 By the end of the twelfth century it was held that, "God alone, and not man, can make an heir.113 Land pur­ chased during one's lifetime could be freely transferred, but wills and deathbed grants of property were forbidden.
    [Show full text]
  • California Abandons the Common Law Rule Richard W
    Hastings Law Journal Volume 24 | Issue 3 Article 7 1-1973 Reservations in Favor of Strangers to the Title: California Abandons the Common Law Rule Richard W. Lasater II Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Richard W. Lasater II, Reservations in Favor of Strangers to the Title: California Abandons the Common Law Rule, 24 Hastings L.J. 469 (1973). Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal/vol24/iss3/7 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hastings Law Journal by an authorized editor of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. RESERVATIONS IN FAVOR OF STRANGERS TO THE TITLE: CALIFORNIA ABANDONS THE COMMON LAW RULE A common practice in modem conveyancing is for A to grant Blackacre to B, reserving or excepting an interest in Blackacre for himself.1 However a problem develops when A attempts to reserve an interest in favor of a third person. The common law opposed res- ervations in favor of third persons.' The common law rule, which grew out of feudal considerations, can be stated as follows: No interest or estate in land may be created in favor of a stranger to the title by means of a reservation or exception in the conveyance thereof.3 California has traditionally recognized this common law rule pro- hibiting reservations to strangers, although this recognition has been in name only, since California has frequently circumvented the rule when its application would lead to an undesirable result.4 In Willard v.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Indenture Buckinghamshire, England 1660 MSS 1779 Box 14, Folder 1, M23 Report
    © 2013 Center for Family History and Genealogy at Brigham Young University. Land Indenture Buckinghamshire, England 1660 MSS 1779 Box 14, Folder 1, M23 Report CONDITION OF THE DOCUMENT The document was found in good condition and the entirety of the documents comprehension was not disturbed by any damage produced from age and time. On the creases there is slight water damage, but the letters are still legible. DESCRIPTION OF THE HAND This document was created the 27 April 1660. It is a land indenture between Hugh Read and Richard Blackhead. This document is written in secretary hand, or the court hand that lasted in England from 1500-1750. To the untrained eye, this writing style could be challenging, but through alphabet charts and accurate transcriptions the document will become easier to read. GLOSSARY OF TERMS (Taken courtesy of the Oxford English Dictionary) Administrators: “A person appointed to administer the estate of a deceased person in default of an executor.” Aliened: “Transferred to the ownership of another; diverted to other uses. Appurtenances: “A thing that belongs to another, a ‘belonging’; a minor property, right, or privilege, belonging to another more important, and passing in possession with it; an appendage.” Arable: “Capable of being ploughed, fit for tillage; opposed to pasture- or wood-land.” Assigns: “One who is appointed to act for another, a deputy, agent, or representative.” Assurances: “The securing of a title to property; the conveyance of lands or tenements by deed; a legal evidence of the conveyance of property.” © 2013 Center for Family History and Genealogy at Brigham Young University.
    [Show full text]
  • Document Bulletin for Weakley, TN
    Document Bulletin for Weakley, TN W County, TN is now electronically recording documents through CSC. Available documents and required fields are listed in the attached table. If this county has not been added to your drop down list and/or you would like to e-Record in this county, please contact your CSC representative. General Requirements for all documents: • Top and Bottom Margin of 3” for first page. All other margins are 1” and for top and bottom of subsequent pages. • Letter and Legal sized documents accepted. • All documents require proper signatures, seal, and notary. • eRecording hours 8:00 AM to 4:00 PM M-F Note: The Tennessee General Assembly passed a new law affecting E-Filed documents. A "certification of electronic document" page is required per amendment (SA0241) to SB0317 to be notarized and attached at the end of the document to be filed. For any L3 submitted documents this template page has been added by CSC and will need to be signed. For any L2 submitted documents a certification of electronic document (see example below) will have to be signed and sent with the original documents. Also this new certification page is considered an additional page to the submission and fees will apply. Document Type Required Indexing and Attachment ABSTRACT OF TRUST Indexing for all document types: Grantor/Grantee AFFIDAVIT Certificate of Authenticity Attachment Option AFFIDAVIT OF AFFIXATION Additional Indexing: AFFIDAVIT OF DE TITLING MANUFACTURING HOME **Consideration AFFIDAVIT OF ERRONEAOUS ASSIGNMENT +Loan Amount AFFIDAVIT OF
    [Show full text]
  • Two Perspectives on the Real Estate Title System: How to Examine a Title in Virginia William Mazel University of Richmond
    University of Richmond Law Review Volume 11 | Issue 3 Article 3 1977 Two Perspectives on the Real Estate Title System: How to Examine a Title in Virginia William Mazel University of Richmond Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.richmond.edu/lawreview Part of the Property Law and Real Estate Commons Recommended Citation William Mazel, Two Perspectives on the Real Estate Title System: How to Examine a Title in Virginia, 11 U. Rich. L. Rev. 471 (1977). Available at: http://scholarship.richmond.edu/lawreview/vol11/iss3/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by UR Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Richmond Law Review by an authorized administrator of UR Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TWO PERSPECTIVES ON THE REAL ESTATE TITLE SYSTEM HOW TO EXAMINE A TITLE IN VIRGINIA William Mazel* I. Introduction ..................................... 472 II. The Title Examination: Where to Begin ............ 472 III. Abstracts of Title ................................ 474 IV . D eeds ........................................... 475 V. Deeds of Bargain and Sale by the Commonwealth ... 477 VI. Corporate Deeds ................................. 478 VII. Special Commissioner's Deeds .................... 478 VIII. Receiver's Deeds ................................. 480 IX. Correction Deed ................................. 481 X. Adverse Conveyances ............................. 481 XI. Deeds of Trust ..................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chap. 20.] REQUISITES to a DEED
    Chap. 20.] REQUISITES TO A DEED. 295 CHAPTER XX. OF ALIENATION BY DEED. IN treating of deeds I shall consider, first, their general nature; and, next, the several sorts or kinds of deeds, with their respective incidents. And in explaining the former, I shall examine, first, what a deed is; secondly, its requi- sites; and, thirdly, how it may be avoided. I. First, then, a deed is a writing sealed and delivered by the parties.(a) It is sometimes called a charter, carta, from its materials; but most usually when applied to the transactions of private subjects, it is called a deed, in Latin factum, xar' e$oX-q , because it is the most solemn and authentic act that a man can possibly perform, with relation to the disposal of his property ; and therefore a man shall always be estopped by his own deed, or not permitted to aver or prove any thing in contradiction to what he has once so solemnly and deliberately avowed.(b) If a deed be made by more parties than one, there ought to be regularly as many copies of it as there are parties, and each should be cut or indented (formerly in acute angles instar dentium, like the teeth of a saw, but at present in a waving line) on the top or side, to tally or correspond with the other; which deed, so made, is called an indenture. Formerly, when deeds were more concise than at present, it was usual to write both parts on the same piece of parchment, with some word or letters of the alphabet written between them; through which the parchment was cut, either in a straight or indented line, in such manner as to leave half the word on *one part and half on the [,296] other.
    [Show full text]
  • Gfniral Statutes
    GFNIRAL STATUTES OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA, IN FOROE JANUARY, 1891. VOL.2. CowwNnro ALL TEE LAw OP & GENERAJ NATURE Now IN FORCE AND NOT IN VOL. 1, THE SAME BEING TEE CODE OF Civu PROCEDURE AND ALL REME- DIAL LAW, THE PROBATE CODE, THE PENAL CODE AND THE CEnt- JRAL PROCEDURE, THE CoNSTITuTIoNS AND ORGANIc ACTS. COMPILED AND ANNOTATED BY JNO. F. KELLY, OF TUE Sr. Pui BAR. SECOND EDITION. ST. PAUL: PUBLISHED BY THE AUTHOR 1891. A MINNESOTA STATUTES 1891 CHAPTER 55 (G. S. ch. 40). DEEDS, MORTGAGES AND OTHER CONVEYANCES. TITI 1. CONVEYANCES REGULAR. 2. CONVEYANcES DEFECTIVE. $ections. Sections. CONVEYANCES REGULAR. CONVEYANCES DEFECTIVE. 4109-4120. Conveyances, covenants, seal. 4154-4158. Legalized. 4121-4128. Execution. 4159-4163. Defective powers of attorney. 4129-4139. Recording. 4164-4177. Defective acknowledgments. 4140-4140. Proof of deeds. 4178-4182. Without witnesses. 4147-4149. Discharging mortgages. 4183-4189. With one witness. 4150-4153. Railroad lands - Record of. 4190-4195. Without seal. TITLE 1. CONVEYANCES REGULAR. SEC. 4109. Land conveyed by deed.— Conveyances of lands, or of any estate or interest therein, may be made by deed, executedby any person hav- ing authority to convey the same, or by his attorney, and acknowledged andt reCorded in tim registry of deeds for the county where the lands lie, without any other act or ceremony. G. S. ch. 40, § 1. 3 M. 119, 225; 6 M. 250. The intention of this statute was no doubt to• abolish livery of seizin, and the distinction between conveyances at common law and convey-- ances under the statute of uses, so that whatever be the frame of the assurance, if the language imparts a conveyance, it is to have that effect.
    [Show full text]