DOCSLIB.ORG

Collaborative Virtual Learning Environments: Design and Evaluation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Collaborative Virtual Learning Environments: Design and Evaluation Multimed Tools Appl (2009) 44:279–304 DOI 10.1007/s11042-009-0289-5 Collaborative virtual learning environments: design and evaluation A. Konstantinidis & Th. Tsiatsos & A. Pomportsis Published online: 12 May 2009 # Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2009 Abstract E-learning systems have gone through a radical change from the initial text- based environments to more stimulating multimedia systems. Such systems are Collabo- rative Virtual Environments, which could be used in order to support collaborative e-learning scenarios. The main aim of this paper is to aid educational designers in selecting, designing and evaluating three dimensional collaborative virtual environments in order to gain the pedagogical benefits of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning. Therefore, this paper initially discusses the potential of three dimensional networked virtual environments for supporting collaborative learning. Furthermore, based on a two-step platform selection process this paper (a) presents and compares three dimensional multi- user virtual environments for supporting collaborative learning and (b) validates the most promising solution against a set of design principles for educational virtual environments. According to these principles, an educational environment has been implemented on top of the selected platform in order to support collaborative e-learning scenarios. The design of this environment is also presented. In addition, this paper presents the results of three small scale studies carried out in a tertiary education department, to assess the educational environment. This environment has been evaluated based on a hybrid evaluation methodology for uncovering usability problems, collecting further requirements for additional functionality to support collaborative virtual learning environments, and determining the appropriateness of different kinds of learning scenarios. Keywords Collaborative learning . CSCL . Virtual classroom . Collaborative virtual environment . Educational multimedia application A. Konstantinidis : T. Tsiatsos (*) : A. Pomportsis Computer Science Department, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece e-mail: [email protected] A. Konstantinidis e-mail: [email protected] A. Pomportsis e-mail: [email protected] 280 Multimed Tools Appl (2009) 44:279–304 1 Introduction Collaborative Learning (CL) is a general term used for the description of educational practices based on the simultaneous cognitive and mental effort of multiple students or/and educators. Students share a common goal, depend on each other and are mutually responsible for their success or failure. Research ([9, 11]), has proven the effectiveness of collaborative learning in some cases compared to other educational practices (e.g. competitive or personalized learning). The above researchers conclude that collaborative activities, centered on a cognitive goal and supported by experts, result in the more meaningful and efficient acquisition of knowledge. This kind of research has led to several educational theories, such as those of constructivism and social learning. Vygotsky, who is the main supporter of social learning theories, states in the basic principles of his theory that “learning and developing is a social, collaborative activity” [30]. The potential pedagogical benefits of collaborative learning, in general, are multiple and varied. Through this pedagogical approach, students can be stimulated to negotiate information such as abstract, ill-defined and not easily accessible knowledge and open-ended problems. Also, collaboration enables the discussion of complex problems from different perspectives and supports learners in the elaboration, explanation and evaluation of information in order to re- and co-construct new knowledge or to solve problems [29]. Probably, the major advantage of collaborative learning compared to other educational practices (e.g. personalized learning) is the interaction with others. According to Piaget, social-arbitrary knowledge (language, values, rules, morality, and symbol systems) can only be attained through such interactions [22]. This collaboration with other students provokes activity, makes learning more realistic and stimulates motivation. Students can ask each other questions and discuss problems from different perspectives. They can propose various answers and solutions and evaluate them on different criteria. Researchers that speak in favor of the use of computers in the collaborative activity, praise this method’s way of aiding the acquisition of higher level cognitive abilities, problem solving abilities, ease in scientific expression and the development of communication, social and higher-order thinking skills [29]. Through Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL), teacher-student interactions are more balanced and evidence also suggests a reduction in gender differences [9]. In addition, learning becomes more student-oriented; with students exhibiting higher levels of attention and motivation, lower inhibitions and more honest and candid attitudes. This student-centric approach increases the likelihood that students will absorb and remember what they learn while making personal connections with powerful ideas. Students of different personality types can enjoy and use the environment to discover aspects of their own identity and strong anchors from which classroom discussions can emerge are created [9]. In this paper we will focus on a specific category of CVEs that aims to support Collaborative Learning. We call these environments Collaborative Virtual Learning Environ- ments (CVLEs). According to [6], a collaborative learning environment is an environment in which: & The users participating have different roles and privileges. & The educational interactions in the environment transform the simple virtual space into a communication space. & The information in the environment is represented in multiple ways that can vary from simple text to three dimensional (3D) graphics. & Students are not passive users but can interact with each other and with the virtual environment. Multimed Tools Appl (2009) 44:279–304 281 & The system that supports the environment integrates multiple technologies. & The possibility of implementing multiple learning scenarios is supported. & Recognizable elements from the real world are visualized. The term Virtual Environment (VE) describes an environment produced from underlying automated rules that allow its users to modify it to some degree [4]. These rules are often referred to as the physics. In addition, inside the virtual environment users are regarded as separate beings. In other words, they are represented uniquely, usually by an anthropo- morphic character referred to as an avatar. Every interaction of the person with the world or with other users is carried out through the avatar. Concluding the definition, in a virtual world all interaction takes place in real time, the world is shared, it supports multiple simultaneous users and is usually persistent (continuing to exist even when no one is present) [4]. A Collaborative Virtual Environment (CVE) is a computer-based, distributed, virtual space or set of places. In such places, people can meet and interact with others, with agents, or with virtual objects. CVEs might vary in their representational richness from 3D graphical spaces, 2.5D and 2D environments, to text-based environments. Access to CVEs is by no means limited to desktop devices, but might well include mobile or wearable devices, public kiosks, etc. [10] From the brief presentation of the pedagogical benefits of collaborative learning in the previous paragraphs we can surmise that the most important factor in designing a CVE is the catering for communication and interaction between the participating students and educators. More specifically, CVEs have many advantages compared to tools supporting traditional teaching methods [9]. In addition to supporting real time distance learning, advantages vary from student motivation and amusement to the simplification of the development of cognitive models from complicated or abstract material. CVEs let users experience environments, which, for reasons of time, distance, scale, and safety, would not otherwise be available, especially to those with disabilities [21]. Regarding CVLEs, there are many issues to be resolved. For example, many practitioners and researchers have witnessed that totally free, unguided or unstructured collaboration does not necessarily result in productive activity or learning [18]. Other main issues that this paper is attempting to address are presented below: 1) The selection of a suitable CVE among the wide range of CVE platforms - one of the strongest arguments against the use of virtual reality for education is that the software and equipment are costly and require technical expertise and skills beyond that of most teachers [31]. This paper is proposing a selection process for a CVE platform which can be used to develop an educational environment that takes advantage of the pedagogical benefits of collaborative learning; 2) The design of a CVLE on top of the selected process - designing a CSCL environment is not just a matter of taking a technological tool, an instructional approach supporting collaboration and an approach to studying its effects and putting them all together. The challenges to instructional designers are how to create motivating goals and tasks for students to perform and how to choose educational topics and concepts where
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Metacircular Architecture for Runtime Optimisation Persistence Clément Béra
    Sista: a Metacircular Architecture for Runtime Optimisation Persistence Clément Béra To cite this version: Clément Béra. Sista: a Metacircular Architecture for Runtime Optimisation Persistence. Program- ming Languages [cs.PL]. Université de Lille 1, 2017. English. tel-01634137 HAL Id: tel-01634137 https://hal.inria.fr/tel-01634137 Submitted on 13 Nov 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Universit´edes Sciences et Technologies de Lille { Lille 1 D´epartement de formation doctorale en informatique Ecole´ doctorale SPI Lille UFR IEEA Sista: a Metacircular Architecture for Runtime Optimisation Persistence THESE` pr´esent´eeet soutenue publiquement le 15 Septembre 2017 pour l'obtention du Doctorat de l'Universit´edes Sciences et Technologies de Lille (sp´ecialit´einformatique) par Cl´ement B´era Composition du jury Pr´esident: Theo D'Hondt Rapporteur : Ga¨elThomas, Laurence Tratt Examinateur : Elisa Gonzalez Boix Directeur de th`ese: St´ephaneDucasse Co-Encadreur de th`ese: Marcus Denker Laboratoire d'Informatique Fondamentale de Lille | UMR USTL/CNRS 8022 INRIA Lille - Nord Europe Numero´ d’ordre: XXXXX i Acknowledgments I would like to thank my thesis supervisors Stéphane Ducasse and Marcus Denker for allowing me to do a Ph.D at the RMoD group, as well as helping and supporting me during the three years of my Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Tinlizzie Wysiwiki and Wikiphone: Alternative Approaches to Asynchronous and Synchronous Collaboration on the Web
    TinLizzie WysiWiki and WikiPhone: Alternative approaches to asynchronous and synchronous collaboration on the Web Yoshiki Oshima, Takashi Yamamiya, Scott Wallace, and Andreas Raab [Also published in the Proc. of the 5th International Conf. on Creating, Connecting, and Collaborating through Computing (C5 2007)] VPRI Technical Report TR-2007-001 Viewpoints Research Institute, 1209 Grand Central Avenue, Glendale, CA 91201 t: (818) 332-3001 f: (818) 244-9761 TinLizzie WysiWiki and WikiPhone: Alternative approaches to asynchronous and synchronous collaboration on the Web Yoshiki Ohshimay Takashi Yamamiyay [email protected] [email protected] Scott Wallacey Andreas Raabz [email protected] [email protected] yViewpoints Research Institute zQwaq, Inc. 1209 Grand Central Ave. 460 S California Ave #304 Glendale, CA 91202 Palo Alto, CA 94306 Abstract they exhibit possible future directions for collaboration on the Web. This paper presents TinLizzie WysiWiki and WikiPhone, two systems which explore new approaches to media-rich end-user collaboration on the World Wide Web. 1 Introduction TinLizzie WysiWiki enables authoring of interactive, media-rich documents, containing graphical objects bear- The World Wide Web, or Web, has been very successful. ing user-defined scripts, on the Web. In TinLizzie WysiWiki, It seems nowadays to dictate not only many end-users' be- a user manipulates text and active objects in a WYSIWYG havior, but also the mindsets of researchers and software graphical editor in a manner similar to Squeak eToys. vendors; the perception is that a new system should run A notable aspect of TinLizzie WysiWiki is that it allows in web browsers to be successful. As a consequence, im- both synchronous and asynchronous collaboration among provement in the overall user experience in applications has multiple users.
    [Show full text]
  • CONFERENCE COMPANION ESUG 2008 - 16Th International Smalltalk Conference
    ESUG-2008 CONFERENCE COMPANION ESUG 2008 - 16th International Smalltalk Conference CONTENTS Platinum Sponsors.......................................................................................................... 3 Gold Sponsors................................................................................................................ 4 Conference Location....................................................................................................... 5 Program Overview........................................................................................................... 8 Saturday, August 23...................................................................................................... 10 Sunday, August 24......................................................................................................... 10 Monday, August 25....................................................................................................... 11 Tuesday, August 26....................................................................................................... 16 Wednesday, August 27.................................................................................................. 20 Thursday, August 28...................................................................................................... 23 Friday, August 29........................................................................................................... 27 Program Overview........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey of Technologies for Building Collaborative Virtual Environments
    The International Journal of Virtual Reality, 2009, 8(1):53-66 53 A Survey of Technologies for Building Collaborative Virtual Environments Timothy E. Wright and Greg Madey Department of Computer Science & Engineering, University of Notre Dame, United States Whereas desktop virtual reality (desktop-VR) typically uses Abstract—What viable technologies exist to enable the nothing more than a keyboard, mouse, and monitor, a Cave development of so-called desktop virtual reality (desktop-VR) Automated Virtual Environment (CAVE) might include several applications? Specifically, which of these are active and capable display walls, video projectors, a haptic input device (e.g., a of helping us to engineer a collaborative, virtual environment “wand” to provide touch capabilities), and multidimensional (CVE)? A review of the literature and numerous project websites indicates an array of both overlapping and disparate approaches sound. The computing platforms to drive these systems also to this problem. In this paper, we review and perform a risk differ: desktop-VR requires a workstation-class computer, assessment of 16 prominent desktop-VR technologies (some mainstream OS, and VR libraries, while a CAVE often runs on building-blocks, some entire platforms) in an effort to determine a multi-node cluster of servers with specialized VR libraries the most efficacious tool or tools for constructing a CVE. and drivers. At first, this may seem reasonable: different levels of immersion require different hardware and software. Index Terms—Collaborative Virtual Environment, Desktop However, the same problems are being solved by both the Virtual Reality, VRML, X3D. desktop-VR and CAVE systems, with specific issues including the management and display of a three dimensional I.
    [Show full text]
  • Bridging the Gap Between Machine and Language Using First-Class Building Blocks
    Bridging the Gap between Machine and Language using First-Class Building Blocks Inauguraldissertation der Philosophisch-naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultat¨ der Universitat¨ Bern vorgelegt von Toon Verwaest von Belgien Leiter der Arbeit: Prof. Dr. O. Nierstrasz Institut fur¨ Informatik und angewandte Mathematik Von der Philosophisch-naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultat¨ angenommen. Copyright © 2012 Toon Verwaest. Software Composition Group University of Bern Institute of Computer Science and Applied Mathematics Neubruckstrasse¨ 10 CH-3012 Bern http://scg.unibe.ch/ ISBN: 978-1-105-51835-5 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution–ShareAlike 3.0 License. The license is available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/. This dissertation is available at http://scg.unibe.ch. Acknowledgments My adventure in Bern started more than four years ago, in October 2007. This page is too short to capture the gratitude I have towards all those who have contributed in any way to this dissertation. First I’d like to extend my gratitude to Oscar Nierstrasz for supporting me throughout my time at the Software Composition Group. He gave me the freedom to develop my own research project, and provided invaluable sup- port in formulating my thoughts. It is thanks to his well-organized research group that developing this thesis almost seemed effortless. I thank Marcus Denker for his continued support and interest in my work. I very much enjoyed our discussions about research; especially while ex- ploring the Swiss mountains. I’d like to thank him for reviewing this thesis, writing the Koreferat, and accepting to be on the PhD committee. I thank Torsten Braun for accepting to chair the PhD defense.
    [Show full text]
  • Croquet: a Collaboration System Architecture
    Croquet: A Collaboration System Architecture David A. Smith, Alan Kay, Andreas Raab, David P. Reed VPRI Technical Report TR-2003-002 Viewpoints Research Institute, 1025 Westwood Blvd 2nd flr, Los Angeles, CA 90024 t: (310) 208-0524 VPRI Technical Report TR-2003-002 Croquet A Collaboration System Architecture David A. Smith Alan Kay 1 Andreas Raab David P. Reed 104 So. Tamilynn Cr. 1209 Grand Central Ave University of MIT Media Laboratory Cary NC, 27513 Glendale, CA 91201 Magdeburg, Germany 20 Ames Street davidasmith@ alan.kay@ andreas.raab@ Room E15-492 bellsouth.net viewpointsresearch.orG squeakland.orG CambridGe, MA 02139 [email protected] ABSTRACT1 this question was asked lonG aGo, and the strenGth of the Croquet [18] is a computer software architecture built from answer has successfully carried us for a quarter century. On the Ground up with a focus on deep collaboration between the other hand, the current environments are really just the teams of users. It is a totally open, totally free, highly thin veneer over what even lonG aGo were seriously portable extension to the Squeak [5] proGramminG system. outmoded approaches to development and desiGn. Many of Croquet is a complete development and delivery platform the really Good fundamental ideas that people had were left for doinG real collaborative work. There is no distinction on the cuttinG room floor. between the user environment and the development environment. great deal has happened in the last few decades that allows Croquet is focused on interactions inside of a 3D shared for some fundamentally new approaches that could not have space that is used for context based collaboration, where been considered at the time.
    [Show full text]
  • Metamodal Mastery – Virtual Mediations of Transdisciplinarity In
    Beyond the Remix 1 Beyond the Remix: Clarifying Mastery In Virtual Environments Mary Leigh Morbey and Carolyn Steele York University Beyond the Remix 2 Abstract Virtual technologies are having a radical impact on university teaching and learning. A cursory survey of academic conferences on teaching and technology reveals an emphasis on sessions discussing the merits of digital dinosaurs such as learning management systems, e-chats, polling functions, and video-streamed lectures. Meanwhile, university students are remixing video and audio files, constructing 3D animations and multiple avatar-based identities, and playing high- end multiplayer video games in which they interact seamlessly with peers around the globe. More recently, we have seen the emergence of metamedia platforms. These are virtual environments which not only provide users with a dynamic, immersive experience, but also enable them to construct, embed, and archive multimedia resources, text, video, and 3D artifacts, and as well as web browsers and entire software applications. This paper focuses on the potential of metamedia in higher education to foster advanced knowledge production and transdisciplinary research in the construction and mediation of multiple complex lifeworlds. Using Second Life and Croquet as case studies for the engagement of the changing media environment in higher education contexts, we examine the potential and actual promise for tertiary education of 3D immersive technology to develop metamodal mastery – the ability to create, analyze, and synthesize data, artifacts, epistemologies, and vocabularies from a variety of fields in a variety of modes and media, within metamedia platforms. The problems and possibilities of metamodal mastery as a viable contribution also will be discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • SMPL: a Network Architecture for Collaborative Distributed Services
    SMPL: A Network Architecture for Collaborative Distributed Services Carlos A. Rocha Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering Universidad de los Andes, September 2002 Submitted to the Program in Media Arts and Sciences, School of Architecture and Planning, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Media Arts and Sciences at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology September 2005 Copyright Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2005. All rights reserved. Carlos A. Rocha Program in Media Arts and Sciences auhor' John Maeda Associate Professor of Design and Computation E. Rudge and Nancy Allen Professor of Media Arts and Sciences thesis supervisor MIT Media Laboratory Dr. Andrew B. Lippman Program in Media Arts and Sciences chkir, departmental commi tee on graduate studies MASSACHUSETTS INSTI'UTE OF TECHNOLOGY ROTCH SEP 2 6 2005 LIBRARIES ...-. rn 'S.'S--- - p w e I 41 SMPL: A Network Architecture for Collaborative Distributed Services by Carlos A. Rocha Submitted to the Program in Media Arts and Sciences, School of Architecture and Planning, on August 5, 2005, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Media Arts and Sciences Abstract This thesis proposes a network architecture, called SMPL, for the design and development of collaboration-oriented, distributed applications over the Internet. The goal of SMPL is to enable the development of applications that easily integrate the capabilities of different types of computing resources, software platforms, and data repositories across the Internet transcending the level of a single device. SMPL proposes a new abstraction of the Internet as a network composed of services, resources, and capabilities instead of just machines.
    [Show full text]
  • Krestianstvo.Org
    Krestianstvo.org Nikolay Suslov ESUG 2007 Krestianstvo - is Croquet SDK based Virtual Learning Environment Igrishe.Krestianstvo.org Obryad.Krestianstvo.org ESUG 2007 Open Croquet project's philosophy ESUG 2007 “We want to create a true collaboration environment, where the computer is not just a world unto itself, but a meeting place for many people where ideas can be expressed, explored, and transferred. “ Croquet SDK documentation ESUG 2007 “There are no boundaries in the system. We are creating an environment where anything can be created; everything can be modified, all in the 3D world. ” Croquet SDK documentation ESUG 2007 “There is no separate development environment, no user environment. It is all the same thing. We can even change and author the worlds in collaboration with others inside them while they are operating.“ Croquet SDK documentation ESUG 2007 Open Croquet SDK technology ESUG 2007 The idea of coordinating object siblings where you have one logical object but many physical manifestations of the same object on different machines, and you have to make them track each other by transactions. Dave Reed ESUG 2007 ESUG 2007 Croquet “Hello world” "1 Creating a Router." id := TObjectID readHexFrom: '35396f525945454344427a696f436c40'. dispatcher := TExampleDispatcher new. dispatcher listenOn: 8081. "fixed port" dispatcher autoCreate: false. router := TSimpleRouter new. router addUserName: 'guest' password: 'guest'. dispatcher addRouter: router id: id. "2.Creating Controller/Island" id := TObjectID readHexFrom: '35396f525945454344427a696f436c40'. address := NetNameResolver addressForName: 'localhost'. controller := TSimpleController new. controller connectTo: address port: 8081 sessionID: id. p := controller login: 'guest' password: 'guest'. p wait. "until connected" p := controller join. "receive messages" p wait. "until joined" p := controller sync.
    [Show full text]
  • Selecting a Networked Virtual Environment Platform and the Design of a Collaborative E-Learning Environment A
    22nd International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications - Workshops Selecting a Networked Virtual Environment Platform and the Design of a Collaborative e-Learning Environment A. Konstantinidis1, Th. Tsiatsos1,2 1Department of Informatics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki 2Research Academic Computer Technology Institute Greece akons, tsiatsos @csd.auth.gr Abstract communication channels are available; the information in the environment is represented in multiple ways that can Our goal was to create a 3D virtual environment vary from simple text to 3D graphics; students are not which could be used to carry out online lectures and passive users but can interact with each other and with the which would offer the most popular features of current virtual environment; the system that supports the CVEs. This paper initially discusses the potential of 3D environment integrates multiple technologies; the networked virtual environments for supporting possibility of implementing multiple learning scenarios is collaborative learning and presents the assets of such supported; recognizable elements from the real world are systems. Furthermore, the paper reviews the features of visualized. In a virtual world all interaction takes place in five such software applications, through the comparison real time, the world is shared, it supports multiple of the tools and services they offer. These include tools for simultaneous users and is usually persistent (meaning that supporting communication, sharing applications, it continues to exist even without any participating users) organizing and coordinating the teaching process and for [13]. Also, virtual worlds let users experience interacting with the virtual environment through an environments which, for reasons of time, distance, scale, avatar.
    [Show full text]
  • Causeway: a Message-Oriented Distributed Debugger Terry Stanley Tyler Close Mark S
    Causeway: A message-oriented distributed debugger Terry Stanley Tyler Close Mark S. Miller Teleometry Design Hewlett Packard Labs Google Research [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Abstract debugger, or some combination. Prior distributed An increasing number of developers face the difficult task debuggers emphasize this process-oriented view of of debugging distributed asynchronous programs. This distributed computation [31]. trend has outpaced the development of adequate debugging With the emergence of the web as an application platform, tools and currently, the best option for many is an ad hoc communicating event loops are rapidly becoming the patchwork of sequential tools and printf debugging. mainstream model for distributed computation. The web This paper presents Causeway, a postmortem distributed browser runs multiple isolated JavaScript programs. Each debugger that demonstrates a novel approach to runs as an event loop, processing user interface events as understanding the behavior of a distributed program. Our well as asynchronous messages from a server [32]. With message-oriented approach borrows an effective strategy upcoming web standards, JavaScript event loops within the from sequential debugging: To find the source of browser will be able to send asynchronous messages to unintended side-effects, start with the chain of expressed each other [4, 5] and to multiple servers [6, 7]. intentions. In the communicating event loops model, there are no We show how Causeway's integrated views – describing explicit receive operations; rather, each received message both distributed and sequential computation – help users notifies a callback, spawning a sequential call-return navigate causal pathways as they pursue suspicions. We computation which executes to completion.
    [Show full text]
  • Jam Tomorrow: Collaborative Music Generation in Croquet Using Openal
    Jam Tomorrow: Collaborative Music Generation in Croquet Using OpenAL Florian Thalmann [email protected] Markus Gaelli [email protected] Institute of Computer Science and Applied Mathematics, University of Bern Neubruckstrasse¨ 10, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland Abstract posing [15] [13] [1] or collaborative open source record- ing [12]. People using such compositional or improvisa- 1 We propose a music generation software that allows tional software are restricted to working on one musical large numbers of users to collaborate. In a virtual world, piece at a time. Our idea is to develop a software that lets groups of users generate music simultaneously at different users collaborate in generating multiple musical pieces si- places in a room. This can be realized using OpenAL sound multaneously within a modern virtual world. People using sources. The generated musical pieces have to be modi- this software will have compositional and improvisational fiable while they are playing and all collaborating users possibilities. should immediately see and hear the results of such mod- In this paper, we start by presenting our conceptual ideas. ifications. We are testing these concepts within Croquet by In section 3 we explain the technology we use for our explo- implementing a software called Jam Tomorrow. rative project, Jam Tomorrow. We continue in section 4 by giving you a more detailed description of the musical con- cept and the architecture of Jam Tomorrow. In the same sec- 1. Introduction tion we describe the major problems we encountered during implementation. Finally, we conclude by discussing future work. “It’s very good jam” said the Queen.
    [Show full text]