Water Levels?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Water Levels? Great Lakes Water Levels What are the factors that influence Great Lakes water levels? What is the “normal” range of Great Lakes water levels? What about Lakes Michigan-Huron? Environmental and Socio-Economic Impacts Climate Variability and the future… Water levels go up, water levels go down…. Great Lakes Cross Section Lakes Michigan Lake Lake Superior and Huron Niagara Falls St. Clair Lake Erie 601.0 ft 579.3 ft 571.0 ft Lake Ontario 245.4 ft 212 ft 925 ft 752 ft St. Lawrence River 20.6 ft 1333 ft 804 ft 379 60 223 89 236 35 150 77 28 52 33 350 Distance in Miles Great Lakes Basin Framework Study What Drives Water Level Change? Climate Precipitation + Runoff – Evaporation = NBS Seasonal changes in climate (annual) Inflows and Outflows Connecting Channel Flows between Lakes Water-Level Regulation Diversions (into and out of basin) Consumptive Uses Wind and Storm Events (short term) Source: Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory 300 Great Lakes Water Runoff Precip Evap 200 Balance 100 0 Lake water levels are climatically -100 mm onmm the Surface Lake driven by seasonal changes in -200 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec precipitation and evaporation. Month 250 Evaporation is affected by surface Net Basin Supply (P + R - E) 200 water temperature, wind speed, and 150 presence/absence of ice cover. 100 50 0 -50 mm onmm the Surface Lake Inflows/outflows via connecting -100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec channels between Lakes Month St. Marys River St. Clair/Detroit River Niagara River St. Lawrence River Hydrological Components Lake Superior Hydrologic Values 56% precipitation Long Lac/ Ogoki 1948-2006 40% runoff 154 m3/s (5400 cfs). 4% diversions ---------------------- Lake Ontario 43% evaporation 57% outflow 79% inflow 15% runoff 6% precipitation ---------------------- Lake Michigan- 93% outflow Huron 7% evaporation St. Marys River 39% precipitation 2110 m3/s 34% runoff 27% inflow ---------------------- 31% evaporation 68% outflow St. Lawrence 3 1% Chicago diversion 7060 m /s Lake Erie Niagara River 5780 m3/s 79% inflow St. Clair/Detroit River 11% precipitation 5360 m3/s 10% runoff ---------------------- 89% outflow 11% evaporation Chicago Diversion 91 m3/s (3,200 cfs) Courtesy IUGLS Diversions and Impacts Lake Superior Great Lakes +9 cm (+3.5”) Long Lac/ Ogoki Connecting Channel 0 154 m3/s (5,400 cfs). 0 Diversion in Net +9 cm (+3.5”) Diversion out Diversion within Lake Michigan- Sault St. Marie Huron Control Structures +11 cm (+4.3”) -6 cm (-2.4”) Cornwall Massena -4 cm (-1.6”) Control Structures Net +1 cm (+0.4”) Welland Canal Lake Erie 244 m3/s (8620 cfs) St. Clair River +7 cm (+2.8”) -4 cm (-1.6”) -12 cm (-4.7”) Net -9 cm (-3.5”) Chicago Diversion 91 m3/s (3,200 cfs) Courtesy IUGLS Lake Ontario Basinwide Drop in Regulation Begins GL Water Levels August 2013 Forecast Low Water Impacts Environmental Shifts in shoreline position/location (loss/gain wetlands) Loss of hydraulic connectivity (Georgian Bay wetlands/tributaries) Changes in seasonal magnitude, timing and duration Altered tributary flows and Lake circulation patterns Degradation of water quality Socio-Economic Commercial Shipping Recreational Boating/Marina Operation Coastal hazards (erosion and flooding) Public Health and Safety (water quality) Property Access Glacial Isostatic Adjustment Glacial Isostatic Adjustment (GIA) in northern Lake Huron and Lake Superior exacerbates impact of low Lake Michigan-Huron water levels. Rates are cm/100 years relative to Lake outlet elevations. IUGLS - Lake Michigan-Huron Water Levels Restoration Scenarios Long-term change in the head between Lakes Michigan-Huron and Level Rationale Lake Erie. 0 cm (0.0”) No change 10 cm (3.9”) Post 1962 dredging Possible erosion/increased 25 cm (9.8”) Plus 27-ft channel (1959- conveyance in St. Clair River due to 1962) dredging and sand mining? 40 cm (15.7”) Plus 1930 mining & 25-ft channel 50 cm (19.7”) All alterations since 1850 1962 last time major dredging occurred on St. Clair River 1 5A (subsequent maintenance dredging 2 lower reaches only). No compensation for St. Clair River 8 dredging (25 and 27 ft channels). IJC Recommendations - St. Clair River Recommends further investigation to restore Lake Michigan-Huron water levels Recommends that the governments undertake further investigation of options to increase water levels in Lakes Michigan-Huron by 13 to 25 cm (about 5 to 10 inches). Investigation to be funded, undertaken, and concluded as quickly as possible. Criteria and Deliverables Explore options that would provide relief during low water periods, but not exacerbate future high water levels, and Provide a comprehensive binational benefit-cost analysis and a detailed environmental impact study of potential structural options. IJC Recommendations - Lake Superior IJC Endorses Lake Superior Regulation Plan 2012. Plan 2012 delivers robust performance over a wide range of possible hydrologic conditions. Preparing supplemental Orders of Approval to implement Plan IJC Recommendations - Multi-Lake Regulation Further study of Multi-Lake Regulation is not warranted. Climate uncertainties, high cost, institutional requirements, and environmental concerns. 1973 Regulation of Great Lakes Water Levels and 1993 IJC Levels Reference Study reached similar conclusions. IJC Recommendations - Adaptive Management Endorses implementation of a comprehensive Adaptive Management approach supported by Science and Monitoring Established International Great Lakes – St. Lawrence River Adaptive Management Task Team to further develop a detailed adaptive management plan. Strengthening hydroclimate monitoring and modeling; Ongoing risk assessment; Ensuring more comprehensive information management and outreach; Improving tools and processes for decision makers; Collaborative regional adaptive management study for addressing water level extremes; and Integration of water quality and quantity modeling activities. Climate Variability and Water Levels According to the most recent climate models, the climate in the upper Great Lakes basin during the next 30-70 years is likely to be characterized by: Increase in storm severity - an increase in precipitation and more frequent and intense storms (weather variability); Increase in evaporation - an increase in lake evaporation resulting from higher surface water temperatures and wind speeds, lack of winter ice; Change in seasonal timing - increased water supply during winter/spring months accompanied by larger decreases in supply during summer/early fall resulting in slight overall annual declines. Future Great Lakes Water Levels Great Lakes water levels are anticipated to remain below long-term historic mean water levels, but generally within the range of historic water levels. Anticipate more extreme and variable water level events, i.e. anticipate both low and high water level regimes that may exceed historic thresholds, both low and high. Lower Lake Michigan-Huron water levels may continue to occur irrespective of St. Clair River compensation. St. Clair River compensation may reduce, but not eliminate potential low water-level impacts on Lakes Michigan-Huron. Adaptive management is still required to plan for (and respond to) extreme water level events whether or not St. Clair River compensation is implemented. Questions? Late Holocene Lake Levels - Lakes Michigan/Huron 178 181.0 ~160-year fluctuation 594 Measured ~30-year fluctuation 180.5 Inferred 592 Nipissing II 180.0 177 phase 590 179.5 588 179.0 1800 2000 178.5 586 Algoma 178.0 phase 584 Historical record 177.5 582 177.0 580 Historical average 176.5 (1819 - 1999) 578 176.0 175.5 576 v. 2003 175.0 574 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 Calendar year before 1950 1950 1500 1000 500 AD 0 BC 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 Year Courtesy Todd A. Thompson - Indiana Geological Survey August 2013 Forecast Lake Superior Water Level Regulation Sabin Rule (1916-1941) Rule P-5 (1941-1951) Rule of 1949 (1951-1955) 1955 Modified Rule of 1949 (1955-1979) SO-901 (“Guide” 1973- 1979) Plan 1977 (1979-1990) Plan 1977A (1990-present) Plan 2012 proposed… Plan 77A and PreProject 184.5 Lake Superior Level 184.0 183.5 183.0 182.5 Pre-Project 182.0 Water Level (m, IGLD 85) IGLD (m, Level Water Plan 77A 181.5 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 178.0 Lake Michigan-Huron Level 177.5 177.0 176.5 176.0 175.5 Water Level (m, IGLD 85) IGLD (m, Level Water 175.0 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 St. Clair River Restoration .
Recommended publications
  • When the Mountain Became the Escarpment.FH11
    Looking back... with Alun Hughes WHEN THE MOUNTAIN BECAME THE ESCARPMENT The Niagara Escarpment hasnt always been But Coronelli was not the first to put Niagara known by that name. Early in the 19th century it on the map. That distinction belongs to Father Louis was often referred to as the Mountain, and of course Hennepin, the Recollect priest who was the first it is still called that in Hamilton and Grimsby today. European to describe Niagara Falls from personal We in eastern Niagara have largely forgotten the observation. In his Description de la Louisiane, name, though it survives in the City of Thorolds published in 1683, five years after his visit, he speaks motto Where the Ships Climb the Mountain. of le grand Sault de Niagara, and labels it thus on the accompanying map. This is the form that So when did the name Niagara Escarpment first prevails thereafter, and it is the spelling used for Fort come into use? And what about the areas other de Niagara, established by the French at the mouth Niagara names, like Niagara Falls, Niagara River of the river in 1726. The English followed suit, and Niagara Peninsula? When did these first appear? though on many early maps (e.g. Moll 1715, I dont pretend to have definitive answers there Mitchell 1782) they use the name Great Fall of are too many sources I have not seen but I can Niagara rather than Niagara Falls. suggest some preliminary conclusions. In his Description Hennepin also refers to la The name Niagara is definitely of native origin, belle Riviere de Niagara, so the name Niagara though there is no agreement about its meaning.
    [Show full text]
  • Occasional Papers of the Museum of Zoology
    OCCASIONAL PAPERS OF THE MUSEUM OF ZOOLOGY UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN I. ON AN INCREASE IN THE NAIAD FAUNA OF SAGINAW BAY, MICHIGAN 11. THE NAIAD SPECIES OF THE GREAT LAI(ES BY CALVINGOODRICH AND HENRYVANDER SCHALIE 1. NINE species of Naiades were found by Dr. H. B. Baker to inhabit Saginaw Bay in the vicinity of Sand Point, Huron County, Michigan, when he made his study of the molluscan fauna of the region in 1908. The survey was a very thorough one and several weelis mere devoted to the work. Twenty-three years later, a much more perfunctory survey was made by the writers of this paper in the same locality, their visits to Sand Point being more in the nature of holidays than for collecting purposes. Yet their findings amounted to thirteen species in contrast to Baker's nine. Moreover, they are enabled to report that five of the nine species of the Baker list proved to be more abundant in 1931 than they were in 1908. Such an increase in ~nollnsca appears to be unusual in American species. The writers are unable to find in the litera- ture of the subject any inention of anything quite like it. In- stances have occurred where an introduced species, Bytlzinia tentaculata (Linnaeus), for example, has developed such a fecundity as to be a pest (F. C. Balier, 1902 ; Sterlqi, 1910). A circnmboreal land snail, Vallonia ~~z~l~lzella(Miiller) , is kno~\~nto have developed exceedingly large colonies that prob- ably were larger than those wliich existed before the trans- plantation of European agriculture on this continent (G.
    [Show full text]
  • Glen Haffy Conservation Area Welcome
    www.trca.on.ca Glen Haffy Conservation Area Welcome to Glen Haffy Conservation Area, a beautiful natural area located within the Humber River Watershed, Humber River Watershed Fishing at Glen Haffy at the junction of Ontario’s two most dominant The Humber River watershed covers an area of 903 square Each year, Glen Haffy raises 60,000 rainbow trout at its on-site geological features - The Niagara Escarpment and kilometres, from the headwaters on the Niagara Escarpment fish hatchery, and these fish are released into the fishing the Oak Ridges Moraine. and Oak Ridges Moraine down to Lake Ontario. The watershed ponds at Glen Haffy Conservation Area, the Glen Haffy Fly provides many benefits to the people who live within it including Fishing Club and Heart Lake Conservation Area. The proceeds Glen Haffy Conservation Area is a 189 hectare Toronto drinking water, solace, renewal and contact with nature. generated by angling fees help fund the fish rearing program. and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) property with great hiking trails you can escape into. Oak Ridges Moraine Glen Haffy Fly Fishing Club The Oak Ridges Moraine stretches as a ridge of hilly terrain for Join the Glen Haffy Fly Fishing Club, escape into 160 kilometres from the Niagara Escarpment in the west to the tranquility and enjoy: headwaters of the Trent River in the east. Rain that is collected and stored in the moraine’s vast underground layers of sand and • Access to private gated Headwaters Ponds located on 600 gravel, which are known as aquifers, eventually resurfaces as acres of prestine conservation lands Become a healthy, clean water that feeds the majority of river systems in • Use of Row Boats, Docks and Log Cabin Conservation the Greater Toronto Area.
    [Show full text]
  • AN OVERVIEW of the GEOLOGY of the GREAT LAKES BASIN by Theodore J
    AN OVERVIEW OF THE GEOLOGY OF THE GREAT LAKES BASIN by Theodore J. Bornhorst 2016 This document may be cited as: Bornhorst, T. J., 2016, An overview of the geology of the Great Lakes basin: A. E. Seaman Mineral Museum, Web Publication 1, 8p. This is version 1 of A. E. Seaman Mineral Museum Web Publication 1 which was only internally reviewed for technical accuracy. The Great Lakes Basin The Great Lakes basin, as defined by watersheds that drain into the Great Lakes (Figure 1), includes about 85 % of North America’s and 20 % of the world’s surface fresh water, a total of about 5,500 cubic miles (23,000 cubic km) of water (1). The basin covers about 94,000 square miles (240,000 square km) including about 10 % of the U.S. population and 30 % of the Canadian population (1). Lake Michigan is the only Great Lake entirely within the United States. The State of Michigan lies at the heart of the Great Lakes basin. Together the Great Lakes are the single largest surface fresh water body on Earth and have an important physical and cultural role in North America. Figure 1: The Great Lakes states and Canadian Provinces and the Great Lakes watershed (brown) (after 1). 1 Precambrian Bedrock Geology The bedrock geology of the Great Lakes basin can be subdivided into rocks of Precambrian and Phanerozoic (Figure 2). The Precambrian of the Great Lakes basin is the result of three major episodes with each followed by a long period of erosion (2, 3). Figure 2: Generalized Precambrian bedrock geologic map of the Great Lakes basin.
    [Show full text]
  • The Niagara Escarpment the Niagara Escarpment Extends from The
    The Niagara Escarpment King Road, looking south from the escarpment, ca. 1910 Source: Halton Information Network The Niagara Escarpment extends from the Niagara River to the northern tip of the Bruce Peninsula and continues through Manitoulin Island. In total, the escarpment stretches 2,300 kilometres and in some places is as much as 250 metres above sea level (Davidson 1989). A variety of landforms exist along the brow of the escarpment, and the vicinity of the escarpment itself is cut by numerous creeks. Several large valleys exist near Waterdown, Lowville, Campbellville and Limehouse. There are scenic gorges further north at the Forks of the Credit (Chapman and Putnam 1984). These physiographic elements have accumulated over red shale bedrock belonging to the Upper Ordovician Queenston formation (Davidson 1989). Contrary to previous belief, the Niagara Escarpment did not emerge as the result of a fault, but rather when much of North America was covered by warm shallow waters 5–4 million years ago. While glaciation did not create the Niagara Escarpment, glacial Lake Iroquois etched and eroded the escarpment face. Prior to Euro-Canadian contact, the Niagara Escarpment was well-utilized by First Nations peoples in the Burlington area. It provided a transportation route along which the long trek could be made northwesterly to the Bruce Peninsula. Additionally, it provided a local resource for the materials used in the production of stone tools such as arrowheads and spear points. Early settlement in the vicinity of the Niagara Escarpment was quite slow due to the complex geography of the escarpment. Farming escarpment lands proved difficult for rudimentary agricultural implements due to the abundance of underlying rock.
    [Show full text]
  • Nipigon Bay Area of Concern Status of Beneficial Use Impairments September 2010
    Nipigon Bay Area of Concern Status of Beneficial Use Impairments September 2010 Nipigon Bay is in the most northerly area of Lake Superior. The Area of Concern takes in a large portion of Nipigon Bay and the Nipigon River, the largest tributary to Lake Superior, and the communities of Red Rock and Nipigon. There are Ontario Power Generation dams on the Nipigon River for the generation of hydroelectricity. The area supports a variety of wetlands and bird populations, including one of four known pelican colonies in Ontario. The watershed forests on both sides of the Nipigon River have been allocated for forest harvesting. Environmental concerns in the Nipigon Bay Area of Concern are related to water level and flow fluctuations in Lake Nipigon and the Nipigon River from the generation of hydroelectricity. These fluctuations affect stream bank stability, sediment load and fish and wildlife habitat. Other concerns include the accumulation of wood fibre, bark and other organic material from past log drives, and effluent discharges from a linerboard mill (which closed in 2006) and the municipal sewage treatment plants in Nipigon and Red Rock. PARTNERSHIPS IN ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Nipigon Bay was designated an Area of Concern in 1987 under the Canada–United States Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement. Areas of Concern are sites on the Great Lakes system where environmental quality is significantly degraded and beneficial uses are impaired. Currently, there are 9 such designated areas on the Canadian side of the Great Lakes, 25 in the United States, and 5 that are shared by both countries. In each Area of Concern, government, community and industry partners are undertaking a coordinated effort to restore environmental quality and beneficial uses through a remedial action plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Superior Food Web MENT of C
    ATMOSPH ND ER A I C C I A N D A M E I C N O I S L T A R N A T O I I O T N A N U E .S C .D R E E PA M RT OM Lake Superior Food Web MENT OF C Sea Lamprey Walleye Burbot Lake Trout Chinook Salmon Brook Trout Rainbow Trout Lake Whitefish Bloater Yellow Perch Lake herring Rainbow Smelt Deepwater Sculpin Kiyi Ruffe Lake Sturgeon Mayfly nymphs Opossum Shrimp Raptorial waterflea Mollusks Amphipods Invasive waterflea Chironomids Zebra/Quagga mussels Native waterflea Calanoids Cyclopoids Diatoms Green algae Blue-green algae Flagellates Rotifers Foodweb based on “Impact of exotic invertebrate invaders on food web structure and function in the Great Lakes: NOAA, Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory, 4840 S. State Road, Ann Arbor, MI A network analysis approach” by Mason, Krause, and Ulanowicz, 2002 - Modifications for Lake Superior, 2009. 734-741-2235 - www.glerl.noaa.gov Lake Superior Food Web Sea Lamprey Macroinvertebrates Sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus). An aggressive, non-native parasite that Chironomids/Oligochaetes. Larval insects and worms that live on the lake fastens onto its prey and rasps out a hole with its rough tongue. bottom. Feed on detritus. Species present are a good indicator of water quality. Piscivores (Fish Eaters) Amphipods (Diporeia). The most common species of amphipod found in fish diets that began declining in the late 1990’s. Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Pacific salmon species stocked as a trophy fish and to control alewife. Opossum shrimp (Mysis relicta). An omnivore that feeds on algae and small cladocerans.
    [Show full text]
  • Danahub 2021 – Reference Library E & O E Overview the Great Lakes Region Is the Living Hub of North America, Where It
    Overview The Great Lakes region is the living hub of North America, where it supplies drinking water to tens of millions of people living on both sides of the Canada-US border. The five main lakes are: Lake Superior, Lake Michigan, Lake Huron, Lake Ontario and Lake Erie. Combined, the Great Lakes contain approximately 22% of the world’s fresh surface water supply. Geography and Stats The Great Lakes do not only comprise the five major lakes. Indeed, the region contains numerous rivers and an estimated 35,000 islands. The total surface area of the Great Lakes is 244,100 km2 – nearly the same size as the United Kingdom, and larger than the US states of New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, Rhode Island, Massachusetts, Vermont and New Hampshire combined! The total volume of the Great Lakes is 6x1015 Gallons. This amount is enough to cover the 48 neighboring American States to a uniform depth of 9.5 feet (2.9 meters)! The largest and deepest of the Great Lakes is Lake Superior. Its volume is 12,100 Km3 and its maximum depth is 1,332 ft (406 m). Its elevation is 183 m above sea level. The smallest of the Great Lakes is Lake Erie, with a maximum depth of 64 m and a volume of 484 Km3. Lake Ontario has the lowest elevation of all the Great Lakes, standing at 74 m above sea level. The majestic Niagara Falls lie between Lakes Erie and Ontario, where there is almost 100 m difference in elevation. Other Rivers and Water Bodies The Great Lakes contain many smaller lakes such as Lake St.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Roadmap to Fishing Lake Superior: Have a Super Time!
    Roadmap to Fishing Lake Superior: Have a Super Time! Want to fish Lake Superior, but aren’t sure when or where to go? This roadmap is a starting point to provide you with information on many fishing sites and times of the year when great opportunities exist. Please note this is not an exhaustive list. Eagle HarborCopper Harbor Traverse Bay Ontonagon Keweenaw Bay Black River Harbor Grand Marais Marquette Au Train-Shelter Bay St. Marys River Munising Black River Au Train- Ontonagon Eagle Harbor Copper Harbor Traverse Bay Keweenaw Bay Marquette Munising Grand Marais St. Marys River Port Harbor Shelter Bay brown trout, Chinook, cisco, coho, brown trout, Chinook, cisco, brown trout, Chinook, cisco, coho, brown trout, lake trout, lake whitefish, round coho, lake trout, lake whitefish, lake trout, lake whitefish, round coho, lake whitefish, n burbot, coho, cisco, walleye, yellow perch Feb - March whitefish, siscowet, smelt, splake, round whitefish, siscowet, smelt, whitefish, splake, steelhead, pike, yellow perch smelt, steelhead steelhead, yellow perch splake, steelhead, yellow perch yellow perch brown trout, Chinook, coho, lake brown trout, Chinook, coho, brown trout, Chinook, cisco, Chinook, cisco, coho, lake brown trout, Chinook, brown trout, Chinook, cisco, coho, Chinook, trout, lake whitefish, Chinook, coho, lake trout, coho, lake trout, round trout, lake whitefish, n pike, coho, lake trout, lake siscowet lake trout, lake whitefish, siscowet, coho, lake round whitefish, April - May lake trout, siscowet, whitefish, siscowet, smelt, sm bass,
    [Show full text]
  • Line 5 Straits of Mackinac Summary When Michigan Was Granted
    Line 5 Straits of Mackinac Summary When Michigan was granted statehood on January 26, 1837, Michigan also acquired ownership of the Great Lakes' bottomlands under the equal footing doctrine.1 However before Michigan could become a state, the United States first had to acquire title from us (Ottawa and Chippewa bands) because Anglo-American law acknowledged that we owned legal title as the aboriginal occupants of the territory we occupied. But when we agreed to cede legal title to the United States in the March 28, 1836 Treaty of Washington ("1836 Treaty", 7 Stat. 491), we reserved fishing, hunting and gathering rights. Therefore, Michigan's ownership of both the lands and Great Lakes waters within the cession area of the 1836 Treaty was burdened with preexisting trust obligations with respect to our treaty-reserved resources. First, the public trust doctrine imposes a duty (trust responsibility) upon Michigan to protect the public trust in the resources dependent upon the quality of the Great Lakes water.2 In addition, Art. IV, § 52 of Michigan's Constitution says "conservation…of the natural resources of the state are hereby declared to be of paramount public concern…" and then mandates the legislature to "provide for the protection of the air, water and other natural resources from 3 pollution, impairment and destruction." 1 The State of Michigan acquired title to these bottomlands in its sovereign capacity upon admission to the Union and holds them in trust for the benefit of the people of Michigan. Illinois Central Railroad Co. v. Illinois, 146 U.S. 387, 434-35 (1892); Nedtweg v.
    [Show full text]
  • Quarterly Climate Impacts and Outlook for the Great Lakes Region
    Quarterly Climate Impacts Great Lakes Region and Outlook December 2018 Great Lakes Significant Events –for September - November 2018 Extreme shifts from unseasonably warm to record cold temperatures occurred this fall season. For Cleveland, OH and Erie, PA, it was the second warmest September on record at 22°C and 21°C (70.7°F and 69.7°F), respectively. Many record warm temperatures occurred in the eastern lakes on October 8 and 9, when Erie tied its warmest October temperature on record at 32°C (89°F). Following extreme warmth early in the season, cold weather abruptly set in for November throughout the basin. The warmest temperature reached in Chicago during all of November was 11°C (52°F), the coldest mark since records began in 1871. Six counties in the central area of the upper peninsula of Michigan recorded their wettest October on record while Sault Ste. Marie, MI had its second wettest October with 19 cm (7 in) of precipitation. Toronto recorded its cloudiest November on record with an average cloud cover of 88% during daylight hours while 10 days during the month were cloudy 100% of the time. In addition, as of December 4, Chicago was having its second wettest year-to-date on record. Regional Climate Overview – for September - November 2018 Fall 2018 Temperature Precipitation and Temperature Departure from Normal September temperatures were up to 4°C (7°F) above normal, with the southern Erie basin being the warmest. October temperatures ranged from 3°C (5°F) below normal in the Superior basin to 3°C Great Lakes Water Levels (5°F) above normal in the southern Erie basin.
    [Show full text]
  • The Laurentian Great Lakes
    The Laurentian Great Lakes James T. Waples Margaret Squires Great Lakes WATER Institute Biology Department University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada Brian Eadie James Cotner NOAA/GLERL Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior University of Minnesota J. Val Klump Great Lakes WATER Institute Galen McKinley University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Atmospheric and Oceanic Services University of Wisconsin-Madison Introduction forests. In the southern areas of the basin, the climate is much warmer. The soils are deeper with layers or North America’s inland ocean, the Great Lakes mixtures of clays, carbonates, silts, sands, gravels, and (Figure 7.1), contains about 23,000 km3 (5,500 cu. boulders deposited as glacial drift or as glacial lake and mi.) of water (enough to flood the continental United river sediments. The lands are usually fertile and have States to a depth of nearly 3 m), and covers a total been extensively drained for agriculture. The original area of 244,000 km2 (94,000 sq. mi.) with 16,000 deciduous forests have given way to agriculture and km of coastline. The Great Lakes comprise the largest sprawling urban development. This variability has system of fresh, surface water lakes on earth, containing strong impacts on the characteristics of each lake. The roughly 18% of the world supply of surface freshwater. lakes are known to have significant effects on air masses Reservoirs of dissolved carbon and rates of carbon as they move in prevailing directions, as exemplified cycling in the lakes are comparable to observations in by the ‘lake effect snow’ that falls heavily in winter on the marine coastal oceans (e.g., Biddanda et al.
    [Show full text]