Press the Man Behind the Dot Luxury
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Underserved Communities
National Endowment for the Arts FY 2016 Spring Grant Announcement Artistic Discipline/Field Listings Project details are accurate as of April 26, 2016. For the most up to date project information, please use the NEA's online grant search system. Click the grant area or artistic field below to jump to that area of the document. 1. Art Works grants Arts Education Dance Design Folk & Traditional Arts Literature Local Arts Agencies Media Arts Museums Music Opera Presenting & Multidisciplinary Works Theater & Musical Theater Visual Arts 2. State & Regional Partnership Agreements 3. Research: Art Works 4. Our Town 5. Other Some details of the projects listed are subject to change, contingent upon prior Arts Endowment approval. Information is current as of April 26, 2016. Arts Education Number of Grants: 115 Total Dollar Amount: $3,585,000 826 Boston, Inc. (aka 826 Boston) $10,000 Roxbury, MA To support Young Authors Book Program, an in-school literary arts program. High school students from underserved communities will receive one-on-one instruction from trained writers who will help them write, edit, and polish their work, which will be published in a professionally designed book and provided free to students. Visiting authors, illustrators, and graphic designers will support the student writers and book design and 826 Boston staff will collaborate with teachers to develop a standards-based curriculum that meets students' needs. Abada-Capoeira San Francisco $10,000 San Francisco, CA To support a capoeira residency and performance program for students in San Francisco area schools. Students will learn capoeira, a traditional Afro-Brazilian art form that combines ritual, self-defense, acrobatics, and music in a rhythmic dialogue of the body, mind, and spirit. -
Dilexi Gallery: Disparate Ontologies “The 1960S Dilexi Gallery, Raw and Radical, Gets Brought Back to Life” by Leah Ollman 30 July 2019
Dilexi Gallery: Disparate Ontologies “The 1960s Dilexi Gallery, raw and radical, gets brought back to life” by Leah Ollman 30 July 2019 The Landing Gallery in L.A., which is part of a retrospective on the midcentury Dilexi Gallery.(Joshua White / The Landing) Retrospective exhibitions typically trace the career of an individual artist, but the format applies equally well to the lifespan of a gallery, as evidenced by “Dilexi Gallery: Disparate Ontologies” at the L.A. gallery the Landing. Organized by independent curator Laura Whitcomb, the show is part of a six-venue pro- gram examining the evolution and character of Dilexi, which operated in San Francisco from 1958 to 1969 as well as in Los Angeles briefly in the early ‘60s. The Landing’s show, like the project as a whole (a comprehensive catalog is forthcoming), is a vibrant lesson in art history-cum-astronomy, a tale of radiant bodies, constellations and orbits. 5118 w Jefferson Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90016, 323 272 3194 The first revelatory big bang came in 1950, when music student Jim Newman met fellow Stanford freshman Walter Hopps. Friendship and collaboration ensued. Hopps launched the legendary Ferus Gallery in L.A. in 1957, and the next year Newman (with poet, artist and activist Bob Alexander) opened Dilexi above a jazz club. Newman later described the venture as “performing more of a missionary or even maybe a political function” than a commercial one. He was drawn to artists — largely Californians — whom he perceived as radical in intent and bold with materials. A New York Times critic called the gallery “a springboard for the hairy avant-garde.” Professional nonconformism seems to have been the gallery’s ethos. -
Hanne Darboven Abstract Correspondence
1 Hanne Darboven Abstract Correspondence Hanne Darboven Abstract Correspondence Published on the occasion of the exhibition Hanne Darboven, A Survey April 11 - May 24, 2013 Castelli “i can’t describe so i will write”: Hanne Darboven’s Abstract Correspondence Cathleen Chaffee “The simplest thing we could say would be that art—all art, abstract or not— reveals what the subject makes of its condition—the condition of language. It shows what the subject … invents to face the paradox of a condition on which we are dependent but which to a large, definitive extent we cannot control.”1 – Birgit Pelzer For many years, I have had a maxim on composition by Hanne Darboven pinned above my writing desk, a statement she repeated so often it became a kind of manifesto: “I do like to write and I don’t like to read / one plus one is one two.”2 When Darboven was alive, I repeated the adage because it was affirming and even encouraging to know that she was probably sitting at a desk in Harburg, near Hamburg laying words, numbers, and symbols down on the page, diligently completing sheaves of work. The idea that made her pick up a pen each day may opposite page have required research and been difficult to conceptualize, but writing it out, 15/2/74 - 4/3/74. NYC “TODAY”, 1974 giving it symbolic form, was just a matter of time. However, it was not just the Pen and marker on amount of writing Darboven seemed to so fluidly produce that made her inspi- a 32-page notebook 1 3 8 /4 x 5 /4 inches rational as a writer; it was her approach to the reader. -
Julian Wasser at Robert Berman/E6 Gallery
INTERNATIONAL ARTS AND CULTURE REVIEW MUCH ADO ABOUT MARCEL: JULIAN WASSER AT ROBERT BERMAN/E6 GALLERY JOHN HELD, JR. — AUGUST 24, 2015 SHARE ON: Installation view of JULIAN WASSER: DUCHAMP IN PASADENA REVISITED… (Summer 2015). image courtesy of Robert Berman/E6 Gallery. Julian Wasser: Duchamp in Pasadena Revisited… June 21 – September 23, 2015 Robert Berman/E6 Gallery 1632 Market St., San Francisco, CA 94102 Much came before and more was to follow, but a pivotal swing in the course of West Coast art history occurred during Marcel Duchamp’s first American museum retrospective at the Pasadena Art Museum in 1963. It was then he sat down to play chess with a naked Eve Babitz—an act that was documented by TIME Magazine-assigned photographer Julian Wasser. By leapfrogging the New York City institutional art establishment, California curatorial foresight provoked a future pregnant with conceptual possibilities escaping a purely “retinal” art. Julian Wasser. “Chess Match, Duchamp scratching nose,” Duchamp Retrospective, Pasadena Art Museum, 1963. Vintage gelatin silver print. 6.75 x 9.5”. Courtesy Robert Berman/E6 Gallery. The exhibition was the brainchild of Walter Hopps, previously associated with the legendary Ferus Gallery and recently installed as Acting Director of the Pasadena Art Museum. As a teenager, Hopps had cut his eyeteeth by pestering Walter Arensberg, and scavenging the collector’s library and key works of Modernism, which Duchamp’s key benefactor had assembled and relocated from New York City. It was there a younger Hopps met Duchamp for the first time. Ensconced in a position to offer Duchamp his first major retrospective, Hopps found that the normally- reluctant Duchamp was predisposed to accept his invitation, given the Arensberg connection and the relocation of important early friends Man Ray and Beatrice Wood to the Los Angeles area. -
Andy Warhol Who Later Became the Most
Jill Crotty FSEM Warhol: The Businessman and the Artist At the start of the 1960s Roy Lichtenstein, Claes Oldenburg and Robert Rauschenberg were the kings of the emerging Pop Art era. These artists transformed ordinary items of American culture into famous pieces of art. Despite their significant contributions to this time period, it was Andy Warhol who later became the most recognizable icon of the Pop Art Era. By the mid sixties Lichtenstein, Oldenburg and Rauschenberg each had their own niche in the Pop Art market, unlike Warhol who was still struggling to make sales. At one point it was up to Ivan Karp, his dealer, to “keep moving things moving forward until the artist found representation whether with Castelli or another gallery.” 1Meanwhile Lichtenstein became known for his painted comics, Oldenburg made sculptures of mass produced food and Rauschenberg did combines (mixtures of everyday three dimensional objects) and gestural paintings. 2 These pieces were marketable because of consumer desire, public recognition and aesthetic value. In later years Warhol’s most well known works such as Turquoise Marilyn (1964) contained all of these aspects. Some marketable factors were his silk screening technique, his choice of known subjects, his willingness to adapt his work, his self promotion, and his connection to art dealers. However, which factor of Warhol’s was the most marketable is heavily debated. I believe Warhol’s use of silk screening, well known subjects, and self 1 Polsky, R. (2011). The Art Prophets. (p. 15). New York: Other Press New York. 2 Schwendener, Martha. (2012) "Reinventing Venus And a Lying Puppet." New York Times, April 15. -
BIO Mariana Cánepa Luna
BIO Mariana Cánepa Luna Mariana Cánepa Luna (b.1977) is a Montevideo-born, Latitudes has participated in lectures, conversations and Barcelona-raised-and-based curator. She graduated in panel discussions including events at Garage Museum History of Art from the Universitat de Barcelona (1995– of Contemporary Art, Moscow (2019), Art Basel Cities: 2000) and studied Cinema History at DAMS, Università Buenos Aires (2019), Fundació Antoni Tàpies, Barcelona degli Studi di Bologna (1999) before completing the MA (2017), ARCOmadrid (2011, 2017), de Appel, Amsterdam Curating Contemporary Art, Royal College of Art, London (2016), Chisenhale Gallery, London (2015), Athens (2002–4). She assisted the curators of the retrospective Biennale (2015), The Common Guild, Glasgow (2013), ‘Frank Gehry, Architect’ at the Solomon R. Guggenheim Sharjah Art Foundation (2012). Museum, New York (2001), and was Fondation de France Curatorial Fellow at the Serpentine Gallery, London Latitudes has also been guest faculty at the Banff Centre (2004–5). Mariana is a regular contributor to art-agenda for Arts and Creativity in Canada (2015, 2017), tutored 3 and between 2015–19 was secretary of the foundation seasons of Barcelona Producció (2016, 2017-18 and governing Hangar Centre of Production, Research and 2019-20), the artistic production grants funded yearly by Visual Arts in Barcelona. the Barcelona City Council and has facilitated a 10-day curatorial intensive for the NUS Museum in Singapore In 2005 she co-founded the curatorial office Latitudes (2014), as well as the first Nature Addicts Fund Travelling with Max Andrews. Latitudes has worked internationally Academyduring dOCUMENTA 13 (2012). across contemporary art practices in a variety of formats and situations, including more than 50 projects Latitudes has convened and hosted 30 hour-long encompassing exhibitions, public realm commissions, presentations during ‘The Dutch Assembly’ in performances, film screenings and discursive ARCOmadrid (2012) and the three-day symposium of the programmes. -
Newsletter Outubro 10 | October10
Newsletter Outubro 10 | October10 Solo JOHN BALDESSARI Pure Beauty Curadores | Curators Enrico Lunghi, Clément Minighetti Metropolitan Museum of Art . Nova Iorque . EUA | New York . USA 20 Outubro a 9 Janeiro | 20 October to 9 January http://www.metmuseum.org Group YONAMINE A República revisitada Curadores | Curators Pedro Lapa Artistas | Artists Ângela Ferreira, Gabriel Abrantes, João Tabarra, João Fonte Santa, João Pedro Vale, Luciana Fina, Mafalda Santos, Pedro Barateiro. Galeria Diário de Notícias . Lisboa | Lisbon . Portugal 7 a 29 Outubro | 7 to 29 October Group JOHN BALDESSARI . LAWRENCE WEINER Just Love Me . Regard sur une collection privée Curadores | Curators Enrico Lunghi, Clément Minighetti Artistas | Artists Curtis Anderson, Vanessa Beecroft, Tracey Emin, Günther Förg, Rebecca Horn, Sol Lewitt, Gerhard Richter, Thomas Ruff, Nora Schattauer, Luc Tuymans, Andy Warhol, (...). MUDAM . Luxemburgo | Luxembourg 9 Outubro a 30 Janeiro 2011 | 9 October to 30 January 2011 http://www.mudam.lu Group DANIEL MALHÃO Falemos de casas: Entre o Norte e o Sul Curadores | Curators Ana Vaz Milheiro, Diogo Seixas Lopes, James Peto, Luís Santiago Baptista, Manuel Graça Dias, Max Risselada, Pedro Pacheco e Peter Cook. Trienal de Arquitectura de Lisboa . Museu Colecção Berardo . Lisboa | Lisbon . Portugal 14 Outubro a 16 Janeiro 2011 | 14 October to16 Janeiro 2011 http://www.trienaldelisboa.com Group JULIÃO SARMENTO . JUAN ARAUJO . Quando a arte fala de arquitectura: construir, desconstruir, habitar Curador | Curator Delfim Sardo Artistas | Artists Ângela Ferreira, Bruce Nauman, Damian Ortega, Dan Graham, Fernanda Fragateiro, Gordon Matta-Clark, Olafur Etiasson, Rita McBride, Robert Gober, (...). Trienal de Arquitectura de Lisboa . MNAC . Museu do Chiado . Lisboa | Lisbon . Portugal 15 Outubro a 21 Novembro | 15 October to 21 November http://www.trienaldelisboa.com Group INTERIORES Project by Pedro Gadanho Artistas | Artists Filipa César, João Paulo Feliciano, Daniel Malhão, Edgar Martins e Fernando Guerra. -
Louise Lawler
Louise Lawler Louise Lawler was born in 1947 in Bronxville, New York. Lawler received her Birdcalls, 1972/1981 VITO ACCONCI audio recording and text, 7:01 minutes BFA in art from Cornell University, New York, in 1969, and moved to New York CARL ANDRE LeWitt Collection, Chester, CT City in 1970. Lawler held her first gallery show at Metro Pictures, New York, in RICHARD ARTSCHWAGER 1982. Soon after, Lawler gained international recognition for her photographic JOHN BALDESSARI ROBERT BARRY and installation-based projects. Her work has been featured in numerous interna- JOSEPH BEUYS tional exhibitions, including Documenta 12, Kassel, Germany (2007); the Whitney DANIEL BUREN Biennial, New York (1991, 2000, and 2008); and the Triennale di Milano (1999). SANDRO CHIA Solo exhibitions of her work have been organized at Portikus, Frankfurt (2003); FRANCESCO CLEMENTE the Museum für Gegenwartskunst, Basel, Switzerland (2004); the Wexner Center ENZO CUCCHI for the Arts, Ohio (2006); and Museum Ludwig, Germany (2013). In 2005, the GILBERT & GEORGE solo exhibition In and Out of Place: Louise Lawler and Andy Warhol was presented DAN GRAHAM at Dia:Beacon, which comprised a selection of photographs taken by Lawler, all HANS HAACKE of which include works by Warhol. She lives and works in New York City. NEIL JENNEY DONALD JUDD ANSELM KIEFER JOSEPH KOSUTH SOL LEWITT RICHARD LONG GORDON MATTA-CLARK MARIO MERZ SIGMAR POLKE GERHARD RICHTER ED RUSCHA JULIAN SCHNABEL CY TWOMBLY ANDY WARHOL LAWRENCE WEINER Louise Lawler Since the early 1970s, Louise Lawler has created works that expose the In 1981, Lawler decided to make an audiotape recording of her reading the economic and social conditions that affect the reception of art. -
Lawrence Weiner
Lawrence Weiner Essay by Lynne Cooke Since 1967 Lawrence Weiner’s work has been formulated by recourse to language rather than the more conventional idioms of painting or sculpture. In language, Weiner found a medium and tool for representing material relationships in the external world in as objective a manner as possible, one that could eliminate all references to authorial subjectivity—all traces of the art- ist’s hand, his skill, or his taste. “ART IS NOT A METAPHOR UPON THE RELATIONSHIP OF HUMAN BEINGS TO OBJECTS & OBJECTS TO OBJECTS IN RELATION TO HUMAN BEINGS BUT A REPRESENTATION OF AN EMPIRICAL EXISTING FACT,” he argues. “IT DOES NOT TELL THE POTENTIAL & CAPABILITIES OF AN OBJECT (MATERIAL) BUT PRESENTS A REALITY CONCERNING THAT RELATIONSHIP.”1 This often-quoted contention is spelled out in characteristically succinct spare terms: it posits the allusive and hypothetical as the negative of that which is, an objectively observable or verifiable concrete reality. By focusing on generalities rather than specifics, Weiner has been able to constitute these material relationships and conditions as abstractions. And by utilizing, wherever possible, semantic and grammatical symbols such as capitalization, brackets, parentheses, ampersands, and the plus and equal signs, or, more recently, arrows and related graphic devices, he has ar- ticulated his work in unequivocally direct terms. Clear, concise, lapidary, and affectless, such sculpture in the guise of statements is designed, in the artist’s words, to offer “a universal com- mon possibility of availability.”2 Eschewing the literary or poetic, this former philosophy stu- dent concentrates on empirically observable properties, materials, states, conditions, processes, behaviors, and functions of matter. -
Export / Import: the Promotion of Contemporary Italian Art in the United States, 1935–1969
City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 2-2016 Export / Import: The Promotion of Contemporary Italian Art in the United States, 1935–1969 Raffaele Bedarida Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/736 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] EXPORT / IMPORT: THE PROMOTION OF CONTEMPORARY ITALIAN ART IN THE UNITED STATES, 1935-1969 by RAFFAELE BEDARIDA A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Art History in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The City University of New York 2016 © 2016 RAFFAELE BEDARIDA All Rights Reserved ii This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in Art History in satisfaction of the Dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy ___________________________________________________________ Date Professor Emily Braun Chair of Examining Committee ___________________________________________________________ Date Professor Rachel Kousser Executive Officer ________________________________ Professor Romy Golan ________________________________ Professor Antonella Pelizzari ________________________________ Professor Lucia Re THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK iii ABSTRACT EXPORT / IMPORT: THE PROMOTION OF CONTEMPORARY ITALIAN ART IN THE UNITED STATES, 1935-1969 by Raffaele Bedarida Advisor: Professor Emily Braun Export / Import examines the exportation of contemporary Italian art to the United States from 1935 to 1969 and how it refashioned Italian national identity in the process. -
For Immediate Release Ed Moses
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE ED MOSES: GESTURE January 14 – March 13, 2021 Brian Gross Fine Art is proud to announce the opening of ED MOSES: GESTURE, on January 14, 2021. This exhibition will showcase Moses’ masterful expressionist painting for which he received much acclaim throughout his career. This is BGFA’s fourteenth exhibition of Ed Moses’ work and the second since his passing in 2018. It will run through March 13th. Ed Moses (1926-2018) is one of the original artists affiliated with the legendary Ferus Gallery in Los Angeles, where he had his first show of abstract paintings in 1958. Over the following 60 years of his career, the driving force behind the creation of his work was his intuitive process of painting, in which gesture, mark making, and painterly exploration of the picture plane was of ultimate importance. This exhibition explores a range of his gestural abstractions made in the 2000’s. Included in the exhibition are paintings like Gold Bach (2002), where sensual, iridescent purple is juxtaposed with patches of deep black. The smaller scale Uno (2008) is a vibrant radiating composition of fuschia and violet that glows with intensity. In Moses’ hands, the paint is poured, scraped and washed over to create richly layered surfaces and effects. In contrast to the bold color seen in most of these works, Rever-Sa #2 and Who-BART (both 2008) are complex linear works, painted with ‘whip line’ gestures in black with positive/negative reversals. In all of these works, Ed Moses’ command of the painted surface is unequivocal. Ed Moses was born in Long Beach and received his BA and MA from the University of California, Los Angeles. -
Armory 2019 the Estate of John Altoon & Jonathan Lyndon Chase
ARMORY 2019 THE ESTATE OF JOHN ALTOON & JONATHAN LYNDON CHASE detail: Jonathan Lyndon Chase, Pulpit 6, 2018 Acrylic, marker, chalk, pastel and glitter on muslin, 84 1/2 x 78 inches Jonathan Lyndon Chase, Pulpit 6, 2018 Acrylic, marker, chalk, pastel and glitter on muslin, 84 1/2 x 78 inches detail: John Altoon, Untitled (B&W-30), 1966, ink on board, 30 x 40 inches John Altoon, Untitled (B&W-30), 1966, ink on board, 30 x 40 inches detail: Jonathan Lyndon Chase, Hands hands hands hands hands hands 2 hoodies, 2018 Acrylic, marker and glitter on muslin, 96 x 72 inches Jonathan Lyndon Chase, Hands hands hands hands hands hands 2 hoodies, 2018 Acrylic, marker and glitter on muslin, 96 x 72 inches John Altoon, Untitled (F-80), 1966, airbrush and ink on board, 30 x 40 inches John Altoon, Untitled (F-5), 1968, airbrush and ink on board, 30 x 40 inches detail: Jonathan Lyndon Chase, Run away with me, 2018 Acrylic, marker and glitter on muslin, 78 x 84 1/2 inches Jonathan Lyndon Chase, Run away with me, 2018 Acrylic, marker and glitter on muslin, 78 x 84 1/2 inches John Altoon, Untitled (ANI-65), 1968, airbrush and ink on board, 30 x 40 inches detail: Jonathan Lyndon Chase, They got a crush on him, 2019 Acrylic, marker, spray paint, oil and glitter on muslin, 72 x 60 inches Jonathan Lyndon Chase, They got a crush on him, 2019 Acrylic, marker, spray paint, oil and glitter on muslin, 72 x 60 inches detail: John Altoon, Untitled (F-74), 1966, ink on board, 30 x 40 inches John Altoon, Untitled (F-74), 1966, ink on board, 30 x 40 inches detail: Jonathan