DOCSLIB.ORG

Coal Mines Historic Site Master Plan 2013

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Coal Mines Historic Site Master Plan 2013 COAL MINES HISTORIC SITE MASTER PLAN 2013 Acknowledgements: This draft Master plan was developed by Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority who gratefully acknowledges all the individuals, groups and organisations who have contributed. Special thanks go to current and former PAHSMA staff who contributed to this document – particularly Marita Perry, Harriet Wyatt, Eric Tierney and Jo Lyngcoln - and to the members of the PAHSMA Community Advisory Committee and the Tasman community who participated in our community consultation steering committee. Thank you for the contribution of support and assistance from Tasmania Parks and Wildlife Service in the preparation of this plan. Thank you also to members of the community who attended information sessions and provided PAHSMA with valuable comments or suggestions. All of these contributions are gratefully acknowledged. CONTENTS COAL MINES HISTORIC SITE MASTER PLAN 2013 ........................................................... 1 Acknowledgements: ....................................................................................................................................................... 2 ABBREVIATIONS .......................................................................................................................... 6 PART A: BACKGROUND TO THE COAL MINES HISTORIC SITE MASTER PLAN .. 7 1.0 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 8 1.1 About the Master Plan ............................................................................................................................................ 10 1.2 Area of Land Subject to the Master Plan ............................................................................................................ 11 1.3 Development of the Master Plan .......................................................................................................................... 15 PART B: UNDERSTANDING THE PLACE ............................................................................ 17 2.0 CONTEXT ................................................................................................................................. 18 2.1 Aboriginal History .................................................................................................................................................. 18 2.2 Convict Settlement .................................................................................................................................................. 18 2.3 Post-Convict Use ..................................................................................................................................................... 22 2.4 Site Declaration and Subsequent Management ................................................................................................ 22 2.5 Tasman Community ............................................................................................................................................... 23 2.6 Visitors ...................................................................................................................................................................... 24 3.0 SITE VALUES .......................................................................................................................... 24 3.1 Aboriginal Heritage Values .................................................................................................................................. 25 3.2 Natural and Historic Heritage Values ................................................................................................................. 26 4.0 MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK ........................................................................................ 32 4.1 Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority ............................................................................................ 32 4.2 Statutory Controls and Policies ............................................................................................................................ 32 4.3 Stakeholders ............................................................................................................................................................. 34 4.4 Resources and Funding .......................................................................................................................................... 34 4.5 Management Framework Issues ........................................................................................................................... 35 5.0 SITE DESCRIPTION AND MANAGEMENT ISSUES ................................................... 35 5.1 Aboriginal Heritage ................................................................................................................................................ 35 5.2 Historic Heritage ..................................................................................................................................................... 36 5.2.1 Cultural Landscape ........................................................................................................................................... 36 5.2.2 Historic Features ............................................................................................................................................... 37 5.2.3 Moveable Heritage ............................................................................................................................................ 40 5.3 Key Heritage Features ............................................................................................................................................ 41 5.3.1 Convict Settlement Heritage ............................................................................................................................ 41 5.4 Post Convict Settlement Heritage ........................................................................................................................ 53 5.5 Natural Environment .............................................................................................................................................. 54 5.5.1 Climate ................................................................................................................................................................ 54 5.5.2 Geology and Geomorphology ......................................................................................................................... 55 5.5.3 Vegetation Communities .................................................................................................................................. 57 5.5.4 Native Flora and Fauna .................................................................................................................................... 61 3 5.5.5 Exotic Fauna and Flora ..................................................................................................................................... 62 5.6 Management Infrastructure and Operations ..................................................................................................... 63 5.7 Access and Visitor Infrastructure ......................................................................................................................... 67 5.8 Visitor Services ........................................................................................................................................................ 73 5.8.1 Visitor Experience ............................................................................................................................................. 73 5.8.2 Interpretation and Education .......................................................................................................................... 74 5.8.3 Site Publicity and Marketing ........................................................................................................................... 77 PART C: MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES ................................................................................ 79 6.0 MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES ........................................................................................... 80 7.0 POLICIES AND ACTIONS ................................................................................................... 81 7.1 Research .................................................................................................................................................................... 81 7.2 Heritage Values Management .............................................................................................................................. 84 7.3 Infrastructure and Site Management ................................................................................................................... 87 7.4 Vegetation Management ........................................................................................................................................ 89 7. 5 Visitor Experience .................................................................................................................................................. 90 7.6 Community and Stakeholder Engagement ........................................................................................................ 92 7. 7 Monitoring and Review .......................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A 'Slow Pace of Life' in Australian Old-Endemic Passerine Birds Is Not Accompanied by Low Basal Metabolic Rates
    University of Wollongong Research Online Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health - Papers: part A Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health 1-1-2016 A 'slow pace of life' in Australian old-endemic passerine birds is not accompanied by low basal metabolic rates Claus Bech University of Wollongong Mark A. Chappell University of Wollongong, [email protected] Lee B. Astheimer University of Wollongong, [email protected] Gustavo A. Londoño Universidad Icesi William A. Buttemer University of Wollongong, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.uow.edu.au/smhpapers Part of the Medicine and Health Sciences Commons, and the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Bech, Claus; Chappell, Mark A.; Astheimer, Lee B.; Londoño, Gustavo A.; and Buttemer, William A., "A 'slow pace of life' in Australian old-endemic passerine birds is not accompanied by low basal metabolic rates" (2016). Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health - Papers: part A. 3841. https://ro.uow.edu.au/smhpapers/3841 Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: [email protected] A 'slow pace of life' in Australian old-endemic passerine birds is not accompanied by low basal metabolic rates Abstract Life history theory suggests that species experiencing high extrinsic mortality rates allocate more resources toward reproduction relative to self-maintenance and reach maturity earlier ('fast pace of life') than those having greater life expectancy and reproducing at a lower rate ('slow pace of life'). Among birds, many studies have shown that tropical species have a slower pace of life than temperate-breeding species.
    [Show full text]
  • Cacomantis Merulinus) Nestlings and Their Common Tailorbird (Orthotomus Sutorius) Hosts Odd Helge Tunheim1, Bård G
    Tunheim et al. Avian Res (2019) 10:5 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40657-019-0143-z Avian Research RESEARCH Open Access Development and behavior of Plaintive Cuckoo (Cacomantis merulinus) nestlings and their Common Tailorbird (Orthotomus sutorius) hosts Odd Helge Tunheim1, Bård G. Stokke1,2, Longwu Wang3, Canchao Yang4, Aiwu Jiang5, Wei Liang4, Eivin Røskaft1 and Frode Fossøy1,2* Abstract Background: Our knowledge of avian brood parasitism is primarily based on studies of a few selected species. Recently, researchers have targeted a wider range of host–parasite systems, which has allowed further evaluation of hypotheses derived from well-known study systems but also disclosed adaptations that were previously unknown. Here we present developmental and behavioral data on the previously undescribed Plaintive Cuckoo (Cacomantis merulinus) nestling and one of its hosts, the Common Tailorbird (Orthotomus sutorius). Methods: We discovered more than 80 Common Tailorbird nests within an area of 25 km2, and we recorded nestling characteristics, body mass, tarsus length and begging display every 3 days for both species. Results: Plaintive Cuckoo nestlings followed a developmental pathway that was relatively similar to that of their well-studied relative, the Common Cuckoo (Cuculus canorus). Tailorbird foster siblings were evicted from the nest rim. The cuckoo nestlings gained weight faster than host nestlings, and required 3–9 days longer time to fedge than host nestlings. Predation was high during the early stages of development, but the nestlings acquired a warning display around 11 days in the nest, after which none of the studied cuckoo nestlings were depredated. The cuckoos’ begging display, which appeared more intense than that of host nestlings, was initially vocally similar with that of the host nestlings but began to diverge from the host sound output after day 9.
    [Show full text]
  • DRAFT Biodiversity Action Plan 2021 - 2026
    DRAFT Biodiversity Action Plan 2021 - 2026 Prepared by: Infrastructure Services & Planning and Ecology Australia Contents Acknowledgments 4 A Vision for the Future 5 Introduction 6 Summary of state and extent of biodiversity in Greater Dandenong 7 Study area 7 Flora and fauna 9 Existing landscape habitat types 10 Key threats to local biodiversity values 12 Habitat assessments 15 Habitat connectivity for icon species 16 Community consultation and engagement 18 Biodiversity legislation considerations 20 Council strategies 22 Actions 23 Protection and enhancement of existing biodiversity values 24 Improving knowledge of biodiversity values 26 Facilitating and encouraging biodiversity conservation and enhancement on private land 27 Managing threatening processes 28 Community engagement and education 30 References 32 Tables Table 1 Summary of most common reasons why biodiversity is considered important from online survey and examples of comments provided 19 Table 2 Commonwealth and Victorian biodiversity legislation 20 Plates Plate 1 City of Greater Dandenong LGA and municipality study area, including surrounding areas of biodiversity significance. 8 Plate 2 Potential connectivity sites within Greater Dandenong for all five icon species 17 DRAFT City of Greater Dandenong Biodiversity Action Plan 2021 – 2026 ii Appendices Appendix 1 Vegetation coverage across the City of Greater Dandenong pre 1750 (left) and today (right). 34 Appendix 2 Fauna species listed as threatened under the EPBC Act 1999 (DAWE 2020), FFG Act 1988 (DELWP 2019b) or the Victorian Threatened Species Advisory List recorded within the City of Greater Dandenong municipality ....................................................................................................... 35 Appendix 3 Flora species listed as threatened under the EPBC Act 1999 (DAWE 2020), FFG Act 1988 (DELWP 2019b) or the Victorian Threatened Species Advisory List recorded within the City of Greater Dandenong municipality ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on the Parasitic Ecology of Newly-Fledged Fan-Tailed Cuckoos Cacomantis Flabelliformis and Their White-Browed Scrubwren Se
    162 The Sunbird 2019, Vol 48 / Colleen Poje et al Notes on the parasitic ecology of newly-fledged Fan-tailed Cuckoos Cacomantis flabelliformis and their White-browed Scrubwren Sericornis frontalis hosts in south-east Queensland Colleen Poje1*, James A. Kennerley1,2*, Nicole M. Richardson1, Zara-Louise Cowan1, Maggie R. Grundler1,3,4, Matthew Marsh1, William E. Feeney1* 1 Environmental Futures Research Institute, Griffith University, Nathan 4111, Australia 2 Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, United Kingdom 3Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, USA 4Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, 94720, USA *Correspond with: [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] Abstract Despite brood parasitic cuckoos being the subject of much scientific attention, in large part due to the study of the adaptation-counter adaptation evolutionary “arms-races” that they have with their hosts, there is surprisingly little literature on the natural habits of newly-fledged cuckoos. Generally, it is believed that after depositing their egg in their host’s nest, adult cuckoos provide no parental care and care is only provided by the foster parents. However, intriguing records of adult cuckoos feeding newly-fledged cuckoos and provisioning by adult birds other than the cuckoo’s host parents exist. Fledged-but-dependent Fan-tailed Cuckoos Cacomantis flabelliformis have been recorded to be fed by both adult conspecifics and a variety of non-foster parent adult birds, making it an interesting species to begin investigating why these phenomena exist. Here, we followed seven fledged but dependent Fan- tailed Cuckoos over the course of three months (August – October 2017) at Lake Samsonvale in south-east Queensland, Australia, to investigate their feeding ecology and record interactions between them and other species.
    [Show full text]
  • Order CUCULIFORMES: Cuckoos Suborder CUCULI: Cuckoos Family CUCULIDAE Leach: Cuckoos Subfamily CUCULINAE Leach: Parasitic Cuckoo
    Text extracted from Gill B.J.; Bell, B.D.; Chambers, G.K.; Medway, D.G.; Palma, R.L.; Scofield, R.P.; Tennyson, A.J.D.; Worthy, T.H. 2010. Checklist of the birds of New Zealand, Norfolk and Macquarie Islands, and the Ross Dependency, Antarctica. 4th edition. Wellington, Te Papa Press and Ornithological Society of New Zealand. Pages 259-260. Order CUCULIFORMES: Cuckoos Suborder CUCULI: Cuckoos An agreed phylogeny of the cuckoos and their relatives has not yet been achieved —see Christidis & Boles (2008) for the latest review of recent studies. Family CUCULIDAE Leach: Cuckoos Subfamily CUCULINAE Leach: Parasitic Cuckoos Cuculidae Leach, 1819: Eleventh room. In Synopsis Contents British Museum 15th Edition, London: 66– Type genus Cuculus Linnaeus, 1758. Order of species follows Christidis & Boles (1994) and Mason (1997). Christidis & Boles (2008) approximately reversed the sequence of genera to Eudynamys, Scythrops, Chalcites, Cacomantis and Cuculus. We have not adopted this since the situation seems unstable and liable to further change. Genus Cuculus Linnaeus Cuculus Linnaeus, 1758: Syst. Nat., 10th edition 1: 110 – Type species (by tautonymy) Cuculus canorus Linnaeus. Heteroscenes Cabanis & Heine, 1863: Mus. Heineanum 4(1): 26 – Type species (by monotypy) Columba pallida Latham = Cuculus pallidus (Latham). Cuculus pallidus (Latham) Pallid Cuckoo Columba pallida Latham, 1802: Index Ornith. Suppl.: lx – “Nouvelle-Hollande”, restricted to New South Wales, Australia (fide Mason 1997, Zool. Cat. Australia 37.2: 228). Cuculus pallidus (Latham); Checklist Committee 1953, Checklist N.Z. Birds: 55. Cuculus (Heteroscenes) pallidus (Latham); Mason 1997, Zool. Cat. Australia 37.2: 228. No subspecies. Breeds in southern parts of Australia, including Tasmania.
    [Show full text]
  • THE TASMANIAN HERITAGE FESTIVAL COMMUNITY MILESTONES 1 MAY - 31 MAY 2013 National Trust Heritage Festival 2013 Community Milestones
    the NatioNal trust presents THE TASMANIAN HERITAGE FESTIVAL COMMUNITY MILESTONES 1 MAY - 31 MAY 2013 national trust heritage Festival 2013 COMMUNITY MILESTONES message From the miNister message From tourism tasmaNia the month-long tasmanian heritage Festival is here again. a full program provides tasmanians and visitors with an opportunity to the tasmanian heritage Festival, throughout may 2013, is sure to be another successful event for thet asmanian Branch of the National participate and to learn more about our fantastic heritage. trust, showcasing a rich tapestry of heritage experiences all around the island. The Tasmanian Heritage Festival has been running for Thanks must go to the National Trust for sustaining the momentum, rising It is important to ‘shine the spotlight’ on heritage and cultural experiences, For visitors, the many different aspects of Tasmania’s heritage provide the over 25 years. Our festival was the first heritage festival to the challenge, and providing us with another full program. Organising a not only for our local communities but also for visitors to Tasmania. stories, settings and memories they will take back, building an appreciation in Australia, with other states and territories following festival of this size is no small task. of Tasmania’s special qualities and place in history. Tasmania’s lead. The month of May is an opportunity to experience and celebrate many Thanks must also go to the wonderful volunteers and all those in the aspects of Tasmania’s heritage. Contemporary life and visitor experiences As a newcomer to the State I’ve quickly gained an appreciation of Tasmania’s The Heritage Festival is coordinated by the National heritage sector who share their piece of Tasmania’s historic heritage with of Tasmania are very much shaped by the island’s many-layered history.
    [Show full text]
  • (Orthotomus Sutorius) Parasitism by Plaintive Cuckoo
    Nahid et al. Avian Res (2016) 7:14 DOI 10.1186/s40657-016-0049-y Avian Research SHORT REPORT Open Access First record of Common Tailorbird (Orthotomus sutorius) parasitism by Plaintive Cuckoo (Cacomantis merulinus) in Bangladesh Mominul Islam Nahid1,2, Frode Fossøy1, Sajeda Begum2, Eivin Røskaft1 and Bård G. Stokke1* Abstract The Plaintive Cuckoo (Cacomantis merulinus) is a widespread brood parasite in Asia, but no data on host species utili- zation in Bangladesh exist. By searching for nests of all possible host species of the Plaintive Cuckoo at Jahangirnagar university campus, north of Dhaka, we were able to determine which hosts were used in this area. We found that the Common Tailorbird (Orthotomus sutorius) was the only potential host used by Plaintive Cuckoos, and parasitism rate was rather high (31.3 %, n 16). However, both host and cuckoo breeding success was poor (0 %, n 16) due to fre- quent nest predation. Details= on host and cuckoo egg appearance are provided. Our findings indicate= that Common Tailorbirds are common hosts of the Plaintive Cuckoo in Central Bangladesh. Keywords: Brood parasitism, Plaintive Cuckoo, Cacomantis merulinus, Common Tailorbird, Orthotomus sutorius, Bangladesh Background brood parasites, the first key information is to provide Several avian brood parasites appear to be generalists at background data on host use in various parts of their the species level, utilizing a range of host species. Such range. parasites, however, may consist of several host specific The Plaintive Cuckoo (Cacomantis merulinus) is an races (also called gentes), each utilizing one or a few interspecific obligatory brood-parasitic bird, with a host species (de Brooke and Davies 1988; Moksnes and wide range in south and south-east Asia (Becking 1981; Røskaft 1995; Davies 2000; Gibbs et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Regent Honeyeater Identification Guide
    REGENT HONEYEATER IDENTIFICATION GUIDE Broad patch of bare warty Males call prominently, skin around the eye, which whereas females only is smaller in young birds occasionally make soft calls. and females. Best seen at close range or with binoculars. Plumage around the head Regent Honeyeaters are and neck is solid black 20-24 cm long, with females giving a slightly hooded smaller and having duller appearance. plumage than the males. Distinctive scalloped (not streaked) breast. Broad stripes of yellow in the wing when folded, and very prominent in flight. From below the tail is a bright yellow. From behind it’s black bordered by bright yellow feathers. COMMON MISIDENTIFICATIONS YELLOW-TUFTED HONEYEATER NEW HOLLAND HONEYEATER WHITE-CHEEKED HONEYEATER Lichenostomus melanops Phylidonyris novaehollandiae Phylidonyris niger Habitat: Box-Gum-Ironbark Habitat: Woodland with heathy Habitat: Heathlands, parks and woodlands and forest with a understorey, gardens and gardens, less commonly open shrubby understorey. parklands. woodland. Notes: Common, sedentary bird Notes: Often misidentified as a Notes: Similar to New Holland of temperate woodlands. Has a Regent Honeyeater; commonly Honeyeaters, but have a large distinctive yellow crown and ear seen in urban parks and gardens. patch of white feathers in their tuft in a black face, with a bright Distinctive white breast with black cheek and a dark eye (no white yellow throat. Underparts are streaks, several patches of white eye ring). Also have white breast plain dirty yellow, upperparts around the face, and a white eye streaked black. olive-green. ring. Tend to be in small, noisy and aggressive flocks. PAINTED HONEYEATER CRESCENT HONEYEATER Grantiella picta Phylidonyris pyrrhopterus Habitat: Box-Ironbark woodland, Habitat: Wetter habitats like particularly with fruiting mistletoe forest, dense woodland and Notes: A seasonal migrant, only coastal heathlands.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Preprint
    A continental measure of urbanness predicts avian response to local urbanization Corey T. Callaghan*1 (0000-0003-0415-2709), Richard E. Major1,2 (0000-0002-1334-9864), William K. Cornwell1,3 (0000-0003-4080-4073), Alistair G. B. Poore3 (0000-0002-3560- 3659), John H. Wilshire1, Mitchell B. Lyons1 (0000-0003-3960-3522) 1Centre for Ecosystem Science; School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences; UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia 2Australian Museum Research Institute, Australian Museum, Sydney, NSW, Australia, 3Evolution and Ecology Research Centre; School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences; UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia *Corresponding author: [email protected] NOTE: This is a pre-print, and the final published version of this manuscript can be found here: https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.04863 Acknowledgements Funding for this work was provided by the Australian Wildlife Society. Mark Ley, Simon Gorta, and Max Breckenridge were instrumental in conducting surveys in the Blue Mountains. We also are grateful to the numerous volunteers who submit their data to eBird, and the dedicated team of reviewers who ensure the quality of the database. We thank the associate editor and two anonymous reviewers for comments that improved this manuscript. Author contributions CTC, WKC, JHW, and REM conceptualized the data processing to assign urban scores. CTC, MBL, and REM designed the study. CTC performed the data analysis with insight from WKC and AGBP. All authors contributed to drafting and editing the manuscript. Data accessibility Code and data necessary to reproduce these analyses have been uploaded as supplementary material alongside this manuscript, and will be made available as a permanently archived Zenodo repository upon acceptance of the manuscript.
    [Show full text]
  • 31 July 2020 Fremantle Prison Celebrates 10 Years As Perth's Only World Heritage Listed Site. Fremantle Prison Will This Week
    31 July 2020 Fremantle Prison celebrates 10 years as Perth’s only World Heritage Listed Site. Fremantle Prison will this week celebrate the 10th anniversary of their World Heritage listing as part of the Australian Convict Sites. Inscribed on the prestigious World Heritage List on 31 July 2010, the Australian Convict Sites, which includes 11 properties from around Australia, tell an important story about the forced migration of over 168,000 men, women and children from Britain to Australia during the late 18th and 19th centuries. Fremantle Prison Heritage Conservation Manager, and current Chair of the Australian World Heritage Advisory Committee, Luke Donegan, said, “Fremantle Prison is a monument to the development of Western Australia as we know it today.” “It is the most intact convict-built cell range in the nation and was the last convict establishment constructed in Australia.” The Australian Convict Sites World Heritage Property also includes Cockatoo Island Convict Site, Sydney, NSW (1839–69); Hyde Park Barracks, Sydney, NSW (1819–48); Kingston and Arthur’s Vale Historic Area, Norfolk Island (active 1788–1814 and 1824–55); Old Government House and Domain, Parramatta Park, NSW (1788– 1856); and the Old Great North Road, Wiseman’s Ferry, NSW (1828–35). Brickendon-Woolmers Estates, Longford (1820–50s); Darlington Probation Station, Maria Island National Park (1825–32 and 1842–50); Cascades Female Factory, Mount Wellington (1828–56); Port Arthur Historic Site, Port Arthur (1830–77); and Coal Mines Historic Site, Norfolk Bay (1833–48). Fremantle Prison marks the place where the practice of forced migration through transportation ceased with the arrival of the convict ship Hougoumont in January 1868, and is an essential part of the Australian convict story.
    [Show full text]
  • Old Government House and Domain, Parramatta Park Management Plan
    OLD GOVERNMENT HOUSE AND DOMAIN, PARRAMATTA PARK MANAGEMENT PLAN 2008 A New South Wales Contributory Site: Australian Convict Sites World Heritage Nomination Cover illustration: Montage of Old Government House, Governor Brisbane’s Bath house, and the Flat Rocks in Parramatta River: Photographer: David Wallace/Parramatta Park Trust The cover of this management plan is badged with a representation of the Great Seal of NSW used between 1790 and 1832. The seal shows on its obverse (front) a design that alludes to the intended redemptive qualities of the convict settlement, and was described in the Royal Warrant granting the seal as follows: Convicts landed at Botany Bay; their fetters taken off and received by Industry, sitting on a bale of goods with her attributes, the distaff [a spindle for spinning wool or flax], bee-hive, pick axe, and spade, pointing to an oxen ploughing, the rising habitations, and a church on a hill at a distance, with a fort for their defence. Motto: Sic fortis etruria crevit [So, I think, this is how brave Etruria grew]; with this inscription round the circumference, Sigillum Nov. Camb. Aust. [Seal of New South Wales] Image source: State Library of NSW, Digital image a1328002 Crown Copyright 2008 Disclaimer Whilst every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that this document is correct at the time of printing, the State of New South Wales, its agents and employees disclaim any and all liability to any persons in respect of anything or the consequences of anything done or omitted to be done in reliance upon the whole or any part of this document.
    [Show full text]
  • Accepted Version
    ACCEPTED VERSION Patrick L. Taggart Are blood haemoglobin concentrations a reliable indicator of parasitism and individual condition in New Holland honeyeaters (Phylidonyris novaehollandiae)? Transactions of the Royal Society of South Australia, 2016; 140(1):17-27 © 2016 Royal Society of South Australia "This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Transactions of the Royal Society of South Australia on 01 Mar 2016 available online: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03721426.2016.1151970 PERMISSIONS http://authorservices.taylorandfrancis.com/sharing-your-work/ Accepted Manuscript (AM) As a Taylor & Francis author, you can post your Accepted Manuscript (AM) on your personal website at any point after publication of your article (this includes posting to Facebook, Google groups, and LinkedIn, and linking from Twitter). To encourage citation of your work we recommend that you insert a link from your posted AM to the published article on Taylor & Francis Online with the following text: “This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in [JOURNAL TITLE] on [date of publication], available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/[Article DOI].” For example: “This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in Africa Review on 17/04/2014, available online:http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/12345678.1234.123456. N.B. Using a real DOI will form a link to the Version of Record on Taylor & Francis Online. The AM is defined by the National Information Standards Organization as: “The version of a journal article that has been accepted for publication in a journal.” This means the version that has been through peer review and been accepted by a journal editor.
    [Show full text]