DOCSLIB.ORG

Food Service Privatization in Michigan's Prisons: Observations of Corrections Officers

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Food Service Privatization in Michigan's Prisons: Observations of Corrections Officers Food Service Privatization in Michigan’s Prisons: Observations of Corrections Officers March, 2016 Roland Zullo, Ph.D. Associate Research Scientist Institute for Research on Labor, Employment and the Economy University of Michigan 734-998-0156 [email protected] This research was funded by the Institute for Research on Labor, Employment and the Economy (IRLEE) at the University of Michigan. I gratefully thank the Michigan Corrections Officers (MCO) for their cooperation and assistance. The MCO recruited participants, arranged interview locations, and reimbursed participants for travel. I also thank the following staff at IRLEE for research assistance: Breana Morton-Holt, Saku Floyd, Andrew Young, James Hendrickson and Rebecca Maher. 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................... 4 Research Purpose .......................................................................................................................... 6 Data and Methods ......................................................................................................................... 6 A Controversial Inception ............................................................................................................ 7 Questionable Performance and Escalating Price ..................................................................... 10 Reading and Interpreting Officer Testimony ........................................................................... 11 Theme 1: Food Service Role and Changes with Privatization ................................................ 12 1.1 Food is Central to Prison Life .......................................................................................... 12 1.2 Food Quality and Quantity Declined ............................................................................... 13 1.3 Slower and Less Reliable Food Service ........................................................................... 16 1.4 Unsanitary Food Handling and Dirty Kitchens .............................................................. 20 Theme 2: Inmate Response ......................................................................................................... 23 2.1 Inmate Protests .................................................................................................................. 23 2.2 Competition for Kitchen Jobs .......................................................................................... 25 2.3 Theft of Food ...................................................................................................................... 27 2.4 Gang Control of Kitchens ................................................................................................. 30 2.5 Inmate Manipulation of Contractor Employees ............................................................. 32 2.6 Anatomy of a Set-Up ......................................................................................................... 35 Theme 3: Divisions and Contested Turf .................................................................................... 40 3.1 Neglecting the Mission of Custody and Security ............................................................ 40 3.2 Disputes over Access and Control of Kitchen Area ........................................................ 41 3.3 Disputes over Inmate Worker Assignments .................................................................... 43 3.4 Disputes over Meal Counts ............................................................................................... 46 Theme 4: Risks to Personnel and Inmates ................................................................................ 51 4.1 Loss of Security Back-up Support ................................................................................... 51 4.2 Inmate Access to Weapons ............................................................................................... 54 4.3 Unjust Treatment of Inmates ........................................................................................... 55 4.4 Inmate to Inmate Conflict................................................................................................. 57 4.5 Inmate Risk due to Food, Sanitation, or Equipment ...................................................... 59 4.6 Risks for Contractor Employees ...................................................................................... 61 Theme 5: Sources of Problems ................................................................................................... 64 5.1 Divided Loyalty and the Profit Motive ............................................................................ 64 2 5.2 Insufficient Contractor Employee Pay ............................................................................ 65 5.3 Contractor Employee Turnover ....................................................................................... 66 5.4 Inadequate Training .......................................................................................................... 67 5.5 Loss of Professionalism ..................................................................................................... 69 5.6 Unstable Staffing ............................................................................................................... 69 5.7 Poor Supervision of Inmate Labor .................................................................................. 71 5.8 Unresponsive Political Leadership ................................................................................... 74 6. Interpretation and Discussion ................................................................................................ 78 6.1 Negative Reciprocating Effects ........................................................................................ 78 6.2 Limitations of the Service Contract ................................................................................. 79 6.3 Hidden and Not-So-Hidden Costs .................................................................................... 80 Appendix A: Aramark Contract Language .............................................................................. 82 3 Executive Summary Prison food service is indelibly joined with the custody and security of inmates. Meals of sufficient quality and quantity that conform to inmate dietary needs, produced in clean environs with sanitized tools, and served punctually temperate inmate behavior, set the rhythm of the prison schedule and are symbols of a just State. Effective policing in the kitchen and chow hall is vital, because these are areas where inmates work, congregate and commit prison infractions. Prior to December 1, 2013, the inmates cooking and serving food in Michigan’s prisons did so under the supervision of a State Food Service Leader. Since then, private firms have supervised food provision, first with Aramark and now Trinity. Using focus group interviews of corrections officers stationed in the chow hall, the goal of this research was to elucidate how privatizing food service affects officers, inmates, contractor personnel, and the mission of custody and security. One theme, which corroborates media accounts, was the dramatic decline in food provision standards. Inferior ingredients, unsanitary conditions, an absence of portion control, shortages and menu substitutes, and disruptions or delays were universally observed. These changes negatively affected the whole prison, and were perceived by officers as a function of the cost- reducing tactics of the contractor. A second theme was the inmate response. Protests by inmates were varied in form and intensity. Individual outbursts occurred, yet more worrisome for officers were collective protests, such as strikes or sit-downs. Inmates also conspired against the contractor by miscounting trays, stealing food and by engaging in other actions that disrupted operations. Contractor employees were largely inexperienced and inadequately trained to work in a prison environment. The authoritative vacuum created by unfit contractor employees was filled by enterprising inmates. Inmates persuaded contractor employees to smuggle in contraband and commit infractions, such as over-familiarity. Contractor employees were manipulated by inmates to form alliances against officers. In some locations gangs gained control the kitchens. A third theme was the divisions between officers and contract employees. In general, the security-minded officers report lax operational practices of contractor staff. Kitchen tools were unsecured, doors were left unlocked, the meal line was not monitored, and inmate workers went unsupervised. Contract employees objected to the removal of inmates from the kitchen, and would grant privileges to inmates that contradicted officer judgment. Officers were accused of sabotaging contractor efforts by stealing food, and were obstructed in their efforts to make security rounds and inspections. Officers even performed tasks that were the responsibility of the private contractor. For instance, to remedy unsanitary kitchen conditions, officers at some facilities supervised a cleaning crew to follow up after the contractor. On occasions when contractor employees failed to show for their shift, officers filled the food supervisor role. In most facilities, officers became obligated to monitor food portions in the serving line and tray counts in order to hold the contractor accountable
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Food in Prison: an Eighth Amendment Violation Or Permissible Punishment?
    University of South Dakota USD RED Honors Thesis Theses, Dissertations, and Student Projects Spring 2020 Food In Prison: An Eighth Amendment Violation or Permissible Punishment? Natasha M. Clark University of South Dakota Follow this and additional works at: https://red.library.usd.edu/honors-thesis Part of the Courts Commons, Food and Drug Law Commons, Human Rights Law Commons, and the Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility Commons Recommended Citation Clark, Natasha M., "Food In Prison: An Eighth Amendment Violation or Permissible Punishment?" (2020). Honors Thesis. 109. https://red.library.usd.edu/honors-thesis/109 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, and Student Projects at USD RED. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Thesis by an authorized administrator of USD RED. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FOOD IN PRISON: AN EIGHTH AMENDMENT VIOLATION OR PERMISSIBLE PUNISHMENT? By Natasha Clark A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the University Honors Program Department of Criminal Justice The University of South Dakota Graduation May 2020 The members of the Honors Thesis Committee appointed to examine the thesis of Natasha Clark find it satisfactory and recommend that it be accepted. Professor Sandy McKeown Associate Professor of Criminal Justice Director of the Committee Professor Thomas Horton Professor & Heidepriem Trial Advocacy Fellow Dr. Thomas Mrozla Assistant Professor of Criminal Justice ii ABSTRACT FOOD IN PRISON: AN EIGHTH AMENDMENT VIOLATION OR PERMISSIBLE PUNISHMENT? Natasha Clark Director: Prof. Sandy McKeown, Associate Professor of Criminal Justice This piece analyzes aspects such as; Eighth Amendment provisions, penology, case law, privatization and monopoly, and food law, that play into the constitutionality of privatized prisons using food as punishment.
    [Show full text]
  • PRISON FOOD RECIPES and TECHNIQUES.Pdf
    PRISON FOOD RECIPES AND TECHNIQUES Prison food is notoriously terrible, and it's not like you can go out to a drive-thru when you get hungry between meal-times. But prison inmates are famous for their amazing creativity — and when they're not making shivs and other improvised weapons, they're creating some truly bizarre food items. Here are 10 food items that you could make from scratch if you pulling a long stint at the big house. Prison inmates have a lot of time on their hands, and a strict schedule to follow. But they still find ways to do some cooking, sneaking out leftovers from the cafeteria and purchasing basic items from prison commissaries. Including these delicacies: 10. Correctional Cake Used to celebrate birthdays and the release of beloved prisoners, this cake is created using Oreo cookies, peanut butter, and M&Ms. The Oreo cookies are separated, with the cookie itself crushed and molded in the presence of water to create the layers of the cake. The creamy interior of the Oreos is used as icing. Peanut butter then becomes icing for another layer, with the "cake" topped off with broken up M&Ms. 9. No Bake Cheesecake Piper Kerman worked as a drug smuggler and money launderer for a West African drug kingpin. She wrote about her time in prison in her memoir, Orange Is The New Black . In the book, Kerman gives the recipe for a common prison cheesecake, made with graham crackers, lemon juice, vanilla pudding mix, stolen margarine, and coffee creamer. 8. Fried Chicken There is not a lot of information out there as to how prisoners accomplish this in their cells, but what is out there involves wiring a heating element into a plastic trashcan.
    [Show full text]
  • The American Gulag: the Correctional Industrial Complex in America
    , j The American Gulag: The Correctional Industrial Complex in America Randall G. Shelden Department of Criminal Justice University of Nevada-Las Vegas Introduction "More than 200,000 scientists and engineers have applied themselves to solving military problems and hundreds of thousands more to innovation in other areas of modern life, but only a handful are working to control the crimes that injure or frighten millions of Americans each year. Yet the two communities have much to offer each other: Science and technology is a valuable source of knowledge and techniques for combating crime; the criminal justice system represents a vast area of challenging problems. ,,1 President's Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice, 1967. A specter is haunting America and it is not the specter of "communism" that Marx and Engels warned us about over 100 years ago. This is much more threatening. This is the specter of the "criminal justice industrial complex." It is an industry run amok. It is awash with cash and profits beyond anyone's imagination. It needs crime. It needs victims. It needs the blood of citizens, like a vampire does. As the news industry saying goes, "If it bleeds, it leads. " Crime today, as always, is often front page news. It dominates the local nightly newscasts, complete with film footage of the victims and the perpetrators. Prime time television is often similarly dominated by crime - from full-length movies to so-called "live" broadcasts of police in action catching criminals. Millions flock to the movie theaters every week to see the latest episodes of crime and violence.
    [Show full text]
  • Last State to Use Death Penalty
    Last State To Use Death Penalty HarryIsolable remains and eastwardly feastful and Bear Hispanic. never jollifies Zestful considering and post-obit when Esau Murdock disembowel face-lift her his adscripts colt. Fallen orchestrates Thurston orframe-up incages very out-of-hand. conceptually while History whose Capital Punishment in California Capital Punishment. Many prominent organizations and restore capital punishment quietly amending its protocol was permitted execution because that capital punishment from accepted his bicycle. Garrett argues, why now? But said last meal for death penalty today have access to uses a class. Arrangements will promptly comply with state. Capital Punishment The end of the recent penalty. Barr said in several of violent criminals most cases to state use death penalty, it take so much discretion of state currently administered equitably to death sentence for. Conviction and use? Florida state death penalty states. Not be executed by staff and are added or depraved manner designed to anchors on their last state to death penalty? Rescuers evacuate residents from their flooded homes in Bekasi on Feb. Supplementary Information in Federal Register documents. Statistical Brief Presents statistics on persons under sentence of death four year-end 2016. Federal executions have been exceedingly rare until recent decades. And that settle that rare are its more relate to convince a focus that mitigating factors justify a picture other hand death. The Department would then either distinct to hope its convenient system known an execution by that manner more than lethal injection or pay box the use over State however local facilities and gamble to beat the execution.
    [Show full text]
  • A Systematic Examination of the Rituals and Rights of the Last Meal
    Mercer University School of Law Mercer Law School Digital Commons Faculty Publications Faculty 2014 Cold Comfort Food: A Systematic Examination of the Rituals and Rights of the Last Meal Sarah Gerwig-Moore Mercer University School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.mercer.edu/fac_pubs Part of the Criminal Law Commons, and the Criminal Procedure Commons Recommended Citation Sarah L. Gerwig-Moore, et al., Cold Comfort Food: A Systematic Examination of the Rituals and Rights of the Last Meal, 2 Brit. J. Am. Legal Stud. 411 (2014). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty at Mercer Law School Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Mercer Law School Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. COLD (COMFORT?) FOOD: THE SIGNIFICANCE OF LAST MEAL RITUALS IN THE UNITED STATES SARAH L. GERWIG-MOORE1 Merceer University School of Law ANDREW DAVIES2 State University of New York at Albany SABRINA ATKINS3 Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz P. C ABSTRACT Last meals are a resilient ritual accompanying executions in the United States. Yet states vary considerably in the ways they administer last meals. This paper ex- plores the recent decision in Texas to abolish the tradition altogether. It seeks to understand, through consultation of historical and contemporary sources, what the ritual signifies. We then go on to analyze execution procedures in all 35 of the states that allowed executions in 2010, and show that last meal allowances are paradoxically at their most expansive in states traditionally associated with high rates of capital punishment (Texas now being the exception to that rule.) We con- clude with a discussion of the implications of last meal policies, their connections to state cultures, and the role that the last meal ritual continues to play in contem- porary execution procedures.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Food Justice and Prison Food Systems
    1 Food Justice and Prison Food Systems: Exploring the Potential for Reframing Prison Food from Punitive to Restorative by Rebekah Mende Department of Food Systems and Society Marylhurst University A thesis submitted in satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Food Systems and Society June 2015 Sean Gillon, Ph.D. – Thesis Advisor 2 3 Copyright © 2015 by Rebekah Mende 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ABSTRACT 1. Chapter One: Introduction………………………………………………………………...8 2. Chapter Two: Background and Significance.....................................................................14 2.1. Incarceration In The United States…………………….…………..…….……....14 2.2. Does Food Justice Sufficiently Engage Prison Food System Reform?.................16 2.3. Roles Of Food In Prison: Food As A Mechanism Of Power And Punishment….20 2.4. How Can Prison Food Systems Be Engaged To Create Prison Food Systems Reform?..................................................................................................................22 3. Chapter Three: Methodology and Methods………………….…………………………..24 3.1. Epistemological Statement…..………………………………………………...…24 3.2. Methodology………………….………………………………..…………..…….25 3.3. Methods…………………….………………………………………..…..……….27 4. Chapter Four: Results, Analysis, and Contribution………………………………...……29 4.1. Research question 1: What Does Food Justice Mean And How Does It Engage Prisons, If At All?..................................................................................................31 4.2. Research question 2: What Are The Roles Of Food In Prison?............................36 4.2.1. Food as nutrition………………………………..…………………..……38 4.2.2. Food as cultural significance……………………..…………….………..40 4.2.3. Food as punishment and as a tool for behavior modification……..……..43 4.3. Research question 3: How Can Prison Food Systems Be Engaged By Food Justice And Prison Reform To Create Restorative Prison Food System Reform?............46 4.3.1. Prison food’s restorative potential……………………………..………...48 4.3.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Health Care in Detention
    HEALTH CARE IN DETENTION A PRACTICAL GUIDE MISSION The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) is an impartial, neutral and independent organization whose exclusively humanitarian mission is to protect the lives and dignity of victims of armed conflict and other situations of violence and to provide them with assistance. The ICRC also endeavours to prevent suffering by promoting and strengthening humanitarian law and universal humanitarian principles. Established in 1863, the ICRC is at the origin of the Geneva Conventions and the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement. It directs and coordinates the international activities conducted by the Movement in armed conflicts and other situations of violence. HEALTH CARE IN DETENTION A PRACTICAL GUIDE Dr Cordula Wolfisberg and Dr Jonathan Beynon co-authored the first edition of this publication in September 2004 with contributions on nutrition from Ana Gerlin Hernández Bonilla. This publication was originally produced for internal ICRC use. Dr Andrew Moscrop, Dr Carole Dromer, Dr Elena Leclerc and Dr Ghirmai Yiehdego prepared this second edition, for public distribution, from 2013 to 2014. It was updated in 2016 to include the substantial revisions of the United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of prisonners adopted by the UN General Assembly in 2015. Dr Raed Aburabi, medical coordinator for the ICRC’s health care in detention team, supervised the preparation of this edition. Contributors from within the ICRC included: Manuel Duce, Isabel Marquez, Valerie Captier, Mary Murphy, Catherine Deman, Isabel Hight, Andres Casal, and Dr Robert Paterson. This guide is dedicated to all the ICRC staff members who died working to save the lives of others.
    [Show full text]
  • Cruel and Usual a National Prisoner Survey of Prison Food and Health Care Quality
    Cruel and Usual A National Prisoner Survey of Prison Food and Health Care Quality April 2018 Incarcerated Workers Organizing Committee Research|Action Cooperative Incarcerated Workers Organizing Committee (IWOC) is a prisoner-led committee of the Industrial Workers of the World (IWW), a prison abolitionist labor union. We strive to support imprisoned IWW members and other prisoners’ ef- forts to better their working and living conditions while also working toward prison abolition as a longer term solution. www.incarceratedworkers.org Research|Action Cooperative is a collective of researchers working to serve social justice organizations, the labor move- ment and the solidarity economy. www.researchaction.net This report should be cited as: Incarcerated Workers Organizing Committee and Research|Action Cooperative. April 2018. Cruel and Usual: A National Prisoner Survey of Prison Food and Health Care Quality. Cruel and Usual: A National Prisoner Survey of Prison Food and Health Care Quality 2 Executive Summary In 2017, we surveyed 123 imprisoned IWW members from 83 prison facilities in 21 states across the United States to determine their views on prison food and health care quality. The vast majority of surveyed prisoners were men from state prisons. Overall, the prisoners describe a prison system that routinely provides inadequate food and health care that endangers their health. Unsanitary conditions, small servings of poor qual- ity food, and lack of attention to special diets are common. Disrespect by health care staff, delayed care, and denial of treatment and medications are also common. Food Quality Issues • 69% of respondents rated the food quality as poor. 56% didn’t know who their food ser- vice provider was.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Full Report
    HUMAN RIGHTS “We are in Tombs” Abuses in Egypt’s Scorpion Prison WATCH “We Are in Tombs” Abuses in Egypt’s Scorpion Prison Copyright © 2016 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 978-1-6231-34051 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch defends the rights of people worldwide. We scrupulously investigate abuses, expose the facts widely, and pressure those with power to respect rights and secure justice. Human Rights Watch is an independent, international organization that works as part of a vibrant movement to uphold human dignity and advance the cause of human rights for all. Human Rights Watch is an international organization with staff in more than 40 countries, and offices in Amsterdam, Beirut, Berlin, Brussels, Chicago, Geneva, Goma, Johannesburg, London, Los Angeles, Moscow, Nairobi, New York, Paris, San Francisco, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto, Tunis, Washington DC, and Zurich. For more information, please visit our website: http://www.hrw.org SEPTEMBER 2016 ISBN: 978-1-6231-34051 “We Are in Tombs” Abuses in Egypt’s Scorpion Prison Map .................................................................................................................................... I Summary ........................................................................................................................... 1 Recommendations ............................................................................................................ 10 To Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Farmers Behind Bars: a Critical Analysis of Prison Farm Labor in Kentucky and Beyond
    Kentucky Journal of Equine, Agriculture, & Natural Resources Law Volume 9 Issue 3 Article 6 2017 Farmers Behind Bars: A Critical Analysis of Prison Farm Labor in Kentucky and Beyond Tatum Isaacs University of Kentucky Follow this and additional works at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/kjeanrl Part of the Labor and Employment Law Commons, and the Law Enforcement and Corrections Commons Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Isaacs, Tatum (2017) "Farmers Behind Bars: A Critical Analysis of Prison Farm Labor in Kentucky and Beyond," Kentucky Journal of Equine, Agriculture, & Natural Resources Law: Vol. 9 : Iss. 3 , Article 6. Available at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/kjeanrl/vol9/iss3/6 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Kentucky Journal of Equine, Agriculture, & Natural Resources Law by an authorized editor of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FARMERs BEHIND BARS: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF PRISON FARM LABOR IN KENTucKY AND BEYOND Tatum Isaacs* Im not as nasty as Confederate fags being tattooed across my city. Maybe the South actuallyis going to rise again. Maybe for some it never really fell. Blacks are stll in shackles and graves, just for being black. Slavery has been reinterpretedas the prison system in front of people who see melanin as animalskin. Ashley Judd, Kentucky Native' I. INTRODUCTION The United States contains a mere 5 percent of the world's population, yet it boasts 25 percent of the world's inmates.
    [Show full text]
  • Cafeteria, Commissary and Cooking: Foodways and Negotiations of Power and Identity in a Women’S Prison
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 2013 Cafeteria, Commissary and Cooking: Foodways and Negotiations of Power and Identity in a Women’s Prison Amy Brooks Smoyer Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/1974 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] CAFETERIA, COMMISSARY AND COOKING: FOODWAYS AND NEGOTIATIONS OF POWER AND IDENTITY IN A WOMEN’S PRISON by AMY B. SMOYER A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Social Welfare in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The City University of New York 2013 ii © 2013 AMY BROOKS SMOYER All Rights Reserved iii This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in Social Welfare in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. ______Deborah L. Tolman. EdD_______________ ________________________ _________________________________________ Date Chair of Examining Committee ______Harriet Goodman, DSW________________ ________________________ _________________________________________ Date Executive Officer ______Mimi Abramovitz, DSW________________ ______Willie Tolliver, DSW__________________ ______Rosemary Barberet, PhD________________ Supervisory Committee THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK iv ABSTRACT CAFETERIA, COMMISSARY AND COOKING: FOODWAYS AND NEGOTIATIONS OF POWER AND IDENTITY IN A WOMEN’S PRISON by Amy B. Smoyer Adviser: Professor Deborah L. Tolman This study uses foodways theory to build knowledge about the lived experience of incarceration by analyzing women’s narratives about prison food and eating.
    [Show full text]
  • I Type This Sentence Twenty He Town of Westville Sits One-Eighth of Westville—Appeared Minutes After Eating Leftover Beneath the Southern Utterly Gulag-Ish
    Eating with the inmates of Westville Correctional Facility I type this sentence twenty he town of Westville sits one-eighth of Westville—appeared minutes after eating leftover beneath the southern utterly gulag-ish. spaghetti and clams for breakfast, a curve of Lake Michigan, The first thing you notice when Hungry Man-sized portion at nine an hour’s drive from Chi- walking into Westville, however, is a.m. It is an exertion of my free will cago, past the belching steel plants that the sta# is unflinchingly Mid- to do so. It is within my civic right of Northwest Indiana. It is every western. Their jocular disposition— as a dedicated grocery shopper and small American town that ever beginning with your pat-down keeper of leftovers, imprinted in the existed, a patchwork of green and o$cer at the security checkpoint— Charter of Man, that I am free to brown rectangles on Google Map’s is unnervingly pleasant. I remem- eat however much I want, of what I satellite view. On the two Janu- ber a coroner I met years ago who want, when I want. ary days I visited Westville Correc- had the most inappropriately mor- In prison, that right is stripped tional Facility, the winter’s second bid sense of humor—he mimed the away. Craving pizza on a Saturday polar vortex was bearing down on suicide victim on the gurney blow- night? Feel like washing it down with Middle America, plunging daytime ing his brains out, complete with cold beer? It’s not happening. Your wind chills to -!" degrees Fahren- exploding hand gestures from his right is reduced to eating portion- heit.
    [Show full text]