DOCSLIB.ORG

Religion Vs. Science?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Religion Vs. Science? UNDERSTANDING AND REFUTING HUMANISM Brother Walter . Table of Contents 1 Introduction to Humanism ..................................................................................................... 5 1.1 What is humanism? .......................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Humanism as an approach to finding knowledge, and a set of beliefs the powerful humanists hold. ........................................................................................................................... 5 1.3 Eve the 1st Humanist ........................................................................................................ 6 1.4 Early views on human autonomy ..................................................................................... 7 1.5 Protagoras and humanism hostility toward God ............................................................. 8 1.6 The Epistemological Conflict between Humanism and Christianity .............................. 11 2 Atheistic Humanism’s views of initial conditions and causes cannot provide a basis for believing order, knowledge, logic or a thinking man. .................................................................. 12 2.1 Humanism’s Universe, History and Humanistic Man .................................................... 12 2.1.1 An important clarification ....................................................................................... 12 2.1.2 Caused, but the measure of all things? Is humanism self-consistent?.................. 12 2.1.3 Problem with induction .......................................................................................... 12 2.2 Huxley’s Analogy –Atheisms failed attempt to provide a basis for order ..................... 13 2.2.1 Huxley ..................................................................................................................... 13 2.2.2 Huxley’s Analogy ..................................................................................................... 13 2.2.3 Understanding Huxley’s Analogy ............................................................................ 14 2.2.4 Problems with the Analogy ..................................................................................... 14 2.2.5 Huxley put to the test ............................................................................................. 15 2.2.6 Postulating an infinite number of universes does not help ................................... 16 2.3 Knowledge and the Humanist ........................................................................................ 16 2.3.1 On what basis does a humanist think knowledge is possible ................................. 16 2.3.2 Is man discovering or deciding truth, justice meaning and morals? ...................... 17 2.4 Important facts about knowledge .................................................................................. 17 2.4.1 Don’t be tricked. ..................................................................................................... 17 2.4.2 Concepts are not equal to the symbols the represent them ................................. 17 2.4.3 Machines do not think ............................................................................................ 17 2.4.4 Concept information is different from information in the Shannon sense ............ 18 2.4.5 Unpredictability is not the hallmark of thought or consciousness ......................... 18 2.4.6 Thinking does not imply learning ............................................................................ 18 2.4.7 Neural Networks do not think ................................................................................ 19 . 2.5 Hawking’s Failed Attempt to explain man’s ability to think .......................................... 19 2.5.1 Hawking’s statement of the problem ..................................................................... 20 2.5.2 Hawking’s attempt to give an explanation ............................................................. 20 2.5.3 Analysis of Hawking’s Explanation .......................................................................... 20 2.5.4 Additional Unwarranted Assumptions of Dr. Hawking .......................................... 21 2.6 The Anthropic Principle: An expression of a humanist longing that his beliefs about history would someday be able to account for the development of a sentient man. ............. 22 2.7 No common ground for the Christian and Humanist .................................................... 23 2.8 List of questions that may help the Humanists recognize their problems .................... 26 3 Humanisms Four Attempts at an Epistemological Method.................................................. 27 3.1.1 How Humanistic epistemology tries to start with man. ......................................... 27 3.2 Mysticism ....................................................................................................................... 27 3.2.1 Problems with Mysticism ........................................................................................ 28 3.3 Fideism ........................................................................................................................... 28 3.3.1 Issues with Fideism ................................................................................................. 29 3.4 Rationalism ..................................................................................................................... 29 3.4.1 What is Rationalism ................................................................................................ 29 3.4.2 Problems with Rationalism ..................................................................................... 31 3.5 Summary of Empiricism ................................................................................................. 32 3.5.1 Empiricism needs an enabling philosophical structure behind it ........................... 33 3.6 Humanism’s Epistemological Quagmire ........................................................................ 33 3.6.1 Problems with Humanism and Its Epistemological Methods ................................. 33 4 Humanism’s incompatibility with Operational Science ........................................................ 34 4.1 Introduction to Operational Science .............................................................................. 34 4.1.1 Definition of operational science ............................................................................ 34 4.1.2 When operational science work well and fails ....................................................... 34 4.1.3 Operational Science is not self-contained .............................................................. 34 4.1.4 A List of Presuppositions Necessary for the Practice of Operational Science ........ 35 4.2 Operational science is not compatible with all worldviews .......................................... 35 4.3 Humanisms commitment to atheism, and man as part of nature. ............................... 37 4.4 Operational science and the humanistic scam .............................................................. 39 5 Humanism and the myth of neutrality ................................................................................. 39 5.1 The humanist approach ................................................................................................. 39 . 5.2 Myth of Neutrality and Religion ..................................................................................... 42 5.2.1 There are no “neutral” sets of axioms. ................................................................... 50 5.2.2 Only God has the correct viewpoint ....................................................................... 50 5.3 An elite group of Humanist men .................................................................................... 43 5.3.1 Humanism does not begin with man but with a select group of men ................... 43 5.3.2 Who are the modern humanists? ........................................................................... 44 5.3.3 Who are the signers of the manifestos? ................................................................. 45 5.4 The Separation of Church and State Scam ..................................................................... 46 5.4.1 Humanists claim they are neutral at first but are totalitarian when they gain control 46 5.4.2 Humanist use the separation of church and state to preclude religious people from government .................................................................................................................. 48 5.4.3 Refuting the “freedom from religion” activists ...................................................... 48 5.4.1 Humanist Accreditations, Regulations and Persecutions ....................................... 49 5.5 Christians are called to subdue the earth and occupy until Christ comes back ............ 50 5.5.1 Verses about law and government ......................................................................... 52 5.6 Christians who have taken the Humanists bait.............................................................. 53 6 Humanism, History and Evolution ........................................................................................ 54 6.1 How Humanists try to sell their ideas under the name of “science” ............................. 55 6.1.1 Humanists reject evidence that does not agree with their ideology as unscientific evidence
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Blind Mole Rat (Spalax Leucodon) Masseter Muscle: Structure, Homology, Diversification and Nomenclature A
    Folia Morphol. Vol. 78, No. 2, pp. 419–424 DOI: 10.5603/FM.a2018.0097 O R I G I N A L A R T I C L E Copyright © 2019 Via Medica ISSN 0015–5659 journals.viamedica.pl Blind mole rat (Spalax leucodon) masseter muscle: structure, homology, diversification and nomenclature A. Yoldas1, M. Demir1, R. İlgun2, M.O. Dayan3 1Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Kahramanmaras University, Kahramanmaras, Turkey 2Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Aksaray University, Aksaray, Turkey 3Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey [Received: 10 July 2018; Accepted: 23 September 2018] Background: It is well known that rodents are defined by a unique masticatory apparatus. The present study describes the design and structure of the masseter muscle of the blind mole rat (Spalax leucodon). The blind mole rat, which emer- ged 5.3–3.4 million years ago during the Late Pliocene period, is a subterranean, hypoxia-tolerant and cancer-resistant rodent. Yet, despite these impressive cha- racteristics, no information exists on their masticatory musculature. Materials and methods: Fifteen adult blind mole rats were used in this study. Dissections were performed to investigate the anatomical characteristics of the masseter muscle. Results: The muscle was comprised of three different parts: the superficial mas- seter, the deep masseter and the zygomaticomandibularis muscle. The superficial masseter originated from the facial fossa at the ventral side of the infraorbital foramen. The deep masseter was separated into anterior and posterior parts. The anterior part of the zygomaticomandibularis muscle arose from the snout and passed through the infraorbital foramen to connect on the mandible.
    [Show full text]
  • HUMANISM Religious Practices
    HUMANISM Religious Practices . Required Daily Observances . Required Weekly Observances . Required Occasional Observances/Holy Days Religious Items . Personal Religious Items . Congregate Religious Items . Searches Requirements for Membership . Requirements (Includes Rites of Conversion) . Total Membership Medical Prohibitions Dietary Standards Burial Rituals . Death . Autopsies . Mourning Practices Sacred Writings Organizational Structure . Headquarters Location . Contact Office/Person History Theology 1 Religious Practices Required Daily Observance No required daily observances. Required Weekly Observance No required weekly observances, but many Humanists find fulfillment in congregating with other Humanists on a weekly basis (especially those who characterize themselves as Religious Humanists) or other regular basis for social and intellectual engagement, discussions, book talks, lectures, and similar activities. Required Occasional Observances No required occasional observances, but some Humanists (especially those who characterize themselves as Religious Humanists) celebrate life-cycle events with baby naming, coming of age, and marriage ceremonies as well as memorial services. Even though there are no required observances, there are several days throughout the calendar year that many Humanists consider holidays. They include (but are not limited to) the following: February 12. Darwin Day: This marks the birthday of Charles Darwin, whose research and findings in the field of biology, particularly his theory of evolution by natural selection, represent a breakthrough in human knowledge that Humanists celebrate. First Thursday in May. National Day of Reason: This day acknowledges the importance of reason, as opposed to blind faith, as the best method for determining valid conclusions. June 21 - Summer Solstice. This day is also known as World Humanist Day and is a celebration of the longest day of the year.
    [Show full text]
  • Classification of Mammals 61
    © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FORCHAPTER SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION Classification © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC 4 NOT FORof SALE MammalsOR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC. NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION. 2ND PAGES 9781284032093_CH04_0060.indd 60 8/28/13 12:08 PM CHAPTER 4: Classification of Mammals 61 © Jones Despite& Bartlett their Learning,remarkable success, LLC mammals are much less© Jones stress & onBartlett the taxonomic Learning, aspect LLCof mammalogy, but rather as diverse than are most invertebrate groups. This is probably an attempt to provide students with sufficient information NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FORattributable SALE OR to theirDISTRIBUTION far greater individual size, to the high on the various kinds of mammals to make the subsequent energy requirements of endothermy, and thus to the inabil- discussions of mammalian biology meaningful.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Atheism, Secularism, Humanism? Academy for Lifelong Learning Fall 2019 Course Leader: David Eller
    What is Atheism, Secularism, Humanism? Academy for Lifelong Learning Fall 2019 Course leader: David Eller Course Syllabus Week One: 1. Talking about Theism and Atheism: Getting the Terms Right 2. Arguments for and Against God(s) Week Two: 1. A History of Irreligion and Freethought 2. Varieties of Atheism and Secularism: Non-Belief Across Cultures Week Three: 1. Religion, Non-religion, and Morality: On Being Good without God(s) 2. Explaining Religion Scientifically: Cognitive Evolutionary Theory Week Four: 1. Separation of Church and State in the United States 2. Atheist/Secularist/Humanist Organization and Community Today Suggested Reading List David Eller, Natural Atheism (American Atheist Press, 2004) David Eller, Atheism Advanced (American Atheist Press, 2007) Other noteworthy readings on atheism, secularism, and humanism: George M. Smith Atheism: The Case Against God Richard Dawkins The God Delusion Christopher Hitchens God is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything Daniel Dennett Breaking the Spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon Victor Stenger God: The Failed Hypothesis Sam Harris The End of Faith: Religion, Terror, and the Future of Religion Michael Martin Atheism: A Philosophical Justification Kerry Walters Atheism: A Guide for the Perplexed Michel Onfray In Defense of Atheism: The Case against Christianity, Judaism, and Islam John M. Robertson A Short History of Freethought Ancient and Modern William Lane Craig and Walter Sinnott-Armstrong God? A Debate between a Christian and an Atheist Phil Zuckerman and John R. Shook, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Secularism Janet R. Jakobsen and Ann Pellegrini, eds. Secularisms Callum G. Brown The Death of Christian Britain: Understanding Secularisation 1800-2000 Talal Asad Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity Lori G.
    [Show full text]
  • The Goals of Humanism1
    SOUND THE ALARM: THE GOALS OF HUMANISM1 The watchman on the wall of an ancient city had to be alert for signs of danger. His responsibility was to inform others of what he saw. Should he detect a foreign army about to attack, he needed to sound an alarm. In our own American history, we remember the midnight ride of Paul Revere—from Charleston to Medford, and on to Concord and Lexington. So through the night rode Paul Revere And so through the night went his cry of alarm To every Middlesex village and farm.2 Likewise, we must sound an alarm regarding humanism and the dangers it presents to Christians. I wish it were possible for us to shout, as did those watchmen on ancient walls, “The enemy is coming!” But that’s not the message about humanism which we must convey. That message would imply that we are here, and that humanism is off over yonder somewhere. Our message—one which leaves us with a sinking feeling—is more comparable to the announcement that “we’ve got termites in our woodwork!” Humanism is not coming. It’s already here! It has already done much damage. It has already eaten far into the structures of our society. It kills unborn babies. It hurts youth with drugs. It dirties minds with profanity. It turns children against their parents. It robs families of their wealth. It severely damages and often destroys Christian families. If left alone, humanism will eat its way through the country until eventually it has destroyed all Christian homes and churches.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction: the Emerging Alliance of World Religions and Ecology
    Emerging Alliance of World Religions and Ecology 1 Mary Evelyn Tucker and John A. Grim Introduction: The Emerging Alliance of World Religions and Ecology HIS ISSUE OF DÆDALUS brings together for the first time diverse perspectives from the world’s religious traditions T regarding attitudes toward nature with reflections from the fields of science, public policy, and ethics. The scholars of religion in this volume identify symbolic, scriptural, and ethical dimensions within particular religions in their relations with the natural world. They examine these dimensions both historically and in response to contemporary environmental problems. Our Dædalus planning conference in October of 1999 fo- cused on climate change as a planetary environmental con- cern.1 As Bill McKibben alerted us more than a decade ago, global warming may well be signaling “the end of nature” as we have come to know it.2 It may prove to be one of our most challenging issues in the century ahead, certainly one that will need the involvement of the world’s religions in addressing its causes and alleviating its symptoms. The State of the World 2000 report cites climate change (along with population) as the critical challenge of the new century. It notes that in solving this problem, “all of society’s institutions—from organized re- ligion to corporations—have a role to play.”3 That religions have a role to play along with other institutions and academic disciplines is also the premise of this issue of Dædalus. The call for the involvement of religion begins with the lead essays by a scientist, a policy expert, and an ethicist.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientists Hope to Breed Asian 'Unicorns' – If They Can Find Them
    Scientists hope to breed Asian ‘unicorns’ – if they can find them Conservationists see only one hope for the saola: a risky captive breeding programme Jeremy Hance Thursday 10 August 2017 03.42 EDT n 1996, William Robichaud spent three weeks with Martha before she died. Robichaud I studied Martha – a beautiful, enigmatic, shy saola – with a scientist’s eye but also fell under the gracile animal’s spell as she ate out of his hand and allowed herself to be stroked. Captured by local hunters, Martha spent those final days in a Laotian village, doted on by Robichaud. Since losing Martha, Robichaud has become the coordinator of the Saola Working Group (SWG) at the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). He has dedicated his life to saving this critically endangered species – and believes the best chance to achieve that now is through a captive breeding programme. “We need to act while there is still time,” he said adding that “seldom, if ever” are captive breeding programs begun too soon for species on the edge. “More likely, too late.” We just found the saola – and now we’re very close to losing it forever. Discovery Hardly a household name, the saola was one of the most astounding biological discoveries of the 20th Century. In 1992, a group of scientists met a local hunter in Vietnam who gave them a skull of something no biologist had ever seen before. The animal – the saola or Pseudoryx nghetinhensis – was a large-bodied terrestrial mammal (80-100kg) that somehow eluded science, though not local people, well into the information age.
    [Show full text]
  • Janne Kontala – EMERGING NON-RELIGIOUS WORLDVIEW PROTOTYPES
    Janne Kontala | Emerging Non-religious Worldview Prototypes | 2016 Prototypes Worldview Non-religious Janne Kontala | Emerging Janne Kontala Emerging Non-religious Worldview Prototypes A Faith Q-sort-study on Finnish Group-affiliates 9 789517 658386 ISBN 978-951-765-838-6 Åbo Akademis förlag Domkyrkotorget 3, FI-20500 Åbo, Finland Tfn +358 (0)2 215 4793 E-post: forlaget@abo. Försäljning och distribution: Åbo Akademis bibliotek Domkyrkogatan 2-4, FI-20500 Åbo, Finland Tfn +358 (0)2 215 4190 E-post: publikationer@abo. EMERGING NON-RELIGIOUS WORLDVIEW PROTOTYPES Emerging Non-religious Worldview Prototypes A Faith Q-sort-study on Finnish Group-affiliates Janne Kontala Åbo Akademis förlag | Åbo Akademi University Press Åbo, Finland, 2016 CIP Cataloguing in Publication Kontala, Janne. Emerging non-religious worldview prototypes : a faith q-sort-study on Finnish group-affiliates / Janne Kontala. - Åbo : Åbo Akademi University Press, 2016. Diss.: Åbo Akademi University. ISBN 978-951-765-838-6 ISBN 978-951-765-838-6 ISBN 978-951-765-839-3(digital) Painosalama Oy Åbo 2016 ABSTRACT This thesis contributes to the growing body of research on non-religion by examining shared and differentiating patterns in the worldviews of Finnish non-religious group-affiliates. The organisa- tions represented in this study consist of the Union of Freethinkers, Finland’s Humanist Association, Finnish Sceptical Society, Prometheus Camps Support Federation and Capitol Area Atheists. 77 non-randomly selected individuals participated in the study, where their worldviews were analysed with Faith Q-sort, a Q-methodological application designed to assess subjectivity in the worldview domain. FQS was augmented with interviews to gain additional information about the emerging worldview prototypes.
    [Show full text]
  • Multiple Molecular Evidences for a Living Mammalian Fossil
    Multiple molecular evidences for a living mammalian fossil Dorothe´ e Huchon†‡, Pascale Chevret§¶, Ursula Jordanʈ, C. William Kilpatrick††, Vincent Ranwez§, Paulina D. Jenkins‡‡, Ju¨ rgen Brosiusʈ, and Ju¨ rgen Schmitz‡ʈ †Department of Zoology, George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel; §Department of Paleontology, Phylogeny, and Paleobiology, Institut des Sciences de l’Evolution, cc064, Universite´Montpellier II, Place E. Bataillon, 34095 Montpellier Cedex 5, France; ʈInstitute of Experimental Pathology, University of Mu¨nster, D-48149 Mu¨nster, Germany; ††Department of Biology, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405-0086; and ‡‡Department of Zoology, The Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD, United Kingdom Edited by Francisco J. Ayala, University of California, Irvine, CA, and approved March 18, 2007 (received for review February 11, 2007) Laonastes aenigmamus is an enigmatic rodent first described in their classification as a diatomyid suggests that Laonastes is a 2005. Molecular and morphological data suggested that it is the living fossil and a ‘‘Lazarus taxon.’’ sole representative of a new mammalian family, the Laonastidae, The two research teams also disagreed on the taxonomic and a member of the Hystricognathi. However, the validity of this position of Laonastes. According to Jenkins et al. (2), Laonastes family is controversial because fossil-based phylogenetic analyses is either the most basal group of the hystricognaths (Fig. 2A)or suggest that Laonastes is a surviving member of the Diatomyidae, nested within the hystricognaths (Fig. 2B). According to Dawson a family considered to have been extinct for 11 million years. et al. (3), Laonastes and the other Diatomyidae are the sister According to these data, Laonastes and Diatomyidae are the sister clade of the family Ctenodactylidae (i.e., gundies), a family that clade of extant Ctenodactylidae (i.e., gundies) and do not belong does not belong to the Hystricognathi, but to which it is to the Hystricognathi.
    [Show full text]
  • Animal Health Requirements for Importation of Rodents, Hedgehogs, Gymnures and Tenrecs Into Denmark
    INTERNATIONAL TRADE DIVISION ANIMAL HEALTH REQUIREMENTS FOR IMPORTATION OF RODENTS, HEDGEHOGS, GYMNURES AND TENRECS INTO DENMARK. La 23,0-2111 These animal health requirements concern veterinary import requirements and certification re- quirements alone and shall apply without prejudice to other Danish and EU legislation. Rodents, hedgehogs, gymnures and tenrecs meaning animals of the Genera/Species listed below: Order Family Rodentia Sciuridae (Squirrels) (except Petaurista spp., Biswamoyopterus spp., Aeromys spp., Eupetaurus spp., Pteromys spp., Glaucomys spp., Eoglaucomys spp., Hylopetes spp., Petinomys spp., Aeretes spp., Trogopterus spp., Belomys, Pteromyscus spp., Petaurillus spp., Iomys spp.), Gliridae (Dormous’), Heteromyidae (Kangaroo rats, kangaroo mice and rock pocket mice), Geomyidae (Gophers), Spalaci- dae (Blind mole rats, bamboo rats, root rats, and zokors), Calomyscidae (Mouse-like hamsters), Ne- somyidae (Malagasy rats and mice, climbing mice, African rock mice, swamp mice, pouched rats, and the white-tailed rat), Cricetidae (Hamsters, voles, lemmings, and New World rats and mice), Muridae (mice and rats and gerbils), Dipodidae (jerboas, jumping mice, and birch mice), Pedetidae (Spring- hare), Ctenodactylidae (Gundis), Diatomyidae (Laotian rock rat), Petromuridae (Dassie Rat), Thryon- omyidae (Cane rats), Bathyergidae (Blesmols), Dasyproctidae (Agoutis and acouchis), Agoutidae (Pacas), Dinomyidae (Pacarana), Caviidae (Domestic guinea pig, wild cavies, mara and capybara), Octodontidae (Rock rats, degus, coruros, and viscacha rats), Ctenomyidae (Tuco-tucos), Echimyidae (Spiny rats), Myocastoridae (Coypu ), Capromyidae (Hutias), Chinchillidae (Chinchillas and visca- chas), Abrocomidae (Chinchilla rats). Erinaceomorpha Erinaceidae (Hedgehogs and gymnures) Afrosoricida Tenrecidae (Tenrecs) The importation of rodents, hedgehogs, gymnures and tenrecs to Denmark (excluding import to ap- proved bodies, institutes and centres as defined in Art. 2, 1, (c) of Directive 92/65/EEC) must comply with the requirements of Danish order no.
    [Show full text]
  • The Religious Humanism of Rachel Carson: on the 50Th Anniversary of the Publication of Silent Spring
    Contribution The Religious Humanism of Rachel Carson: On the 0th Anniversary of the Publication of Silent Spring Connie Lasher 1. Introduction HE year 2012 marks the fiftieth anniversary of the 192 publication Tof a book which is widely acknowledged to have initiated the modern environmental movement. That book was Silent Spring,1 and of its author, Rachel Carson, it has been said that “a few thousand words from her and the world took a new direction.”2 Fifty years after Silent Spring, a book which appeared at the end of Carson’s life, there is renewed interest in comprehending the significance of her legacy. For, as Lisa Sideris and Kathleen Dean Moore note in the Introduction to their fine anthology, Rachel Carson: Legacy and Challenge, “Carson did not set out to be an ‘environmentalist’ or an ‘environmental writer’ in the modern sense. Silent Spring, with its detailed documentation of the dangers of pesticides and explicit warnings against their indiscriminate use, was in many ways a departure from the genre of writing Carson knew and loved best.” Indeed, those of us whose lives and work have been inspired by the legacy of this humble but valiant woman recognize, with Sideris and Moore, the importance of honoring “the whole person who was Rachel Carson, the whole of her work, the wholeness of her view of the earth.” It is this legacy of wholeness, in its historical, cultural, and religious context, which the present study seeks to convey. However, is it appropriate to apply the term “religious humanism” to Carson’s life and worldview? It is, to be sure, not a term that she used to describe herself.
    [Show full text]
  • Schooling and Religion: a Secular Humanist View
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 320 283 EA 021 949 AUTHOR Bauer, Norman J. TITLE Schooling and Religion: A Secular Humanist View. PUB DATE Oct 89 NOTE 23p.; Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Studies Association (Chicago, IL, October 25-26, 1989). PUB TYPE Speeches/Conference Papers (150)-- Reports - Evaluative /Feasibility (142) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC01 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Educational Philosophy; Elementary Secondary Education; *Humanism; Religion Studies; *Religious Education; State Church Separation ABSTRACT The proper relation between religion and public schooling is addressed in this paper which reviews the secular humanist position and recommends ways to pursue the study of religion in classrooms. This dual purpose is achieved through thefollowing process: (1) reconstruction of an empirical-naturalistic image of reality (Image 1); (2) construction of an image of reflective thought, which is the product of this view of reality (Image 2);and (3) examination of the implications of the twoimages for the philosophy of education, sociopolitical order, and curricular content, organization, and implementation. The secular humanist position is not foreign to the notion of religious ideas and values. Images 1 and 2 stress the contemporary secular humanists' optimistic belief in human nature and scientific reason for the attainmentof human fulfillment. This position is compatible with the stanceheld by the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution for theintegration of religious study within public schools. (17 references) (LMI) * Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be ma.e * * from the original document. * SCHOOLING AND RELIGION: A SECULAR HUMANIST VIEW Norman J. Bauer, Ed.D. Professor of Education State University of New York Geneseo, New York U S DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Office of EducahOnal Research and Improvement "PERMISSION TO REPRODUCETHIS URIC IONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION MATERIAL HAS BEEN GRANTEDBY CENTER (ERIC) This document has been reproduced as .
    [Show full text]