Antelope Creek Ranch Is a Beautiful and Versatile Property Comprised of 1,736 +/- Deeded Acres with Additional Lease Ground

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Antelope Creek Ranch Is a Beautiful and Versatile Property Comprised of 1,736 +/- Deeded Acres with Additional Lease Ground AntelopeBIG TIM BCreekER, MONT ANARanch Fly Fishing | Hunting | Ranching | Conservation BIGAntelope TIMBER, M CreekONTANA Ranch Introduction: Located approximately 6 miles west of Big Timber and 28 miles east of Livingston, Montana, the Antelope Creek Ranch is a beautiful and versatile property comprised of 1,736 +/- deeded acres with additional lease ground. With its varied terrain, diverse habitat and wildlife, and multiple land use options, the ranch provides high-quality recreational opportunities along with a viable agricultural component. With 2+/- miles of prime frontage on the Yellowstone River, the ranch features direct access to one of the best trout streams in Montana. In addition, the Antelope Creek Ranch boasts a spring creek that heads up on the property and flows for better than 1/3 of a mile through riparian river-bottom land, as well as a freestone creek and two stocked trout ponds. Improvements include a 2,400 sqft 5-bedroom, 2-bathroom home and a 1,850 sqft second home, and several outbuildings including a large horse barn and arena. Nearby outdoor recreational pursuits are boundless because the ranch is located in one of the most scenic and sporting regions of Montana. With options ranging from Jeff Shouse, Broker • Cell: 406.580.5078 fishing, wing shooting and big game hunting to farming Craig Janssen, Montana Managing Broker and running horses or cattle, the ranch is well-suited for Toll Free: 866.734.6100 Office: 406.586.6010 a variety of sporting and income-producing pursuits. The offering price is $3,900,000. www.LiveWaterProperties.com Location: The Antelope Creek Ranch is located approximately six The area around Big Timber is framed by three prominent miles west of Big Timber, 28 miles east of Livingston, 54 mountain ranges — the Absaroka/Beartooth complex to miles east of Bozeman and 80 miles west of Billings. the south and the Crazy Mountains to the north, with the snowcapped summits of certain peaks exceeding 10,000 This region of south-central Montana is characterized feet. The Yellowstone River bisects the land between the by varying geography — irrigated river valleys, timbered mountains and is fed by numerous freestone streams and foothill and bench country, vast expanses of rolling prairie spring creeks. Populations of elk, deer and moose are and rangeland and high-alpine mountainous terrain. The frequently seen in the foothills and hayfields, and grizzlies area is touted for its recreational opportunities, cultural can still be found roaming the forests and peaks. variety, historical richness and distinctive “Western” feel. Big Timber lies on the south bank of the Yellowstone Situated on the northern fringe of the Greater River and is considered the major trade center for the Yellowstone Ecosystem, Montana’s Sweet Grass County immediate area. With 1,600 residents, Big Timber was is relatively unpopulated with 3,600 people spread across founded in 1883 and serves as the county seat of Sweet approximately 1,860 square miles. Large areas of open Grass County. The town provides shopping and service- space prevail, and the landscape has largely escaped the related amenities, schools, restaurants and “watering subdivision and urban sprawl evident in some other holes,” specialty shops, car dealerships, motels and scenic parts of the state. This characteristic is attributed hotels, a regional hospital (Pioneer Medical Center) and to the fact that agriculture remains the primary a small jet-capable airport. Major shopping tasks can be economic activity, centered around large commercial accomplished in nearby Bozeman or Billings, which also cattle and sheep ranches and farming operations. provide the closest commercial jet air service. www.LiveWaterProperties.com The Property: At an elevation ranging from 4,100 to 4,500 feet, the is also used to graze aftermath in the fall and feed cattle in Antelope Creek Ranch comprises approximately 1,736 the winter. The stocking rate is estimated at 400AUMs for +/- deeded and 134+/- acres of State of Montana lease this portion of the ranch. The north agricultural operation ground. The acreage north of I-90 is leased on a year-to-year basis to a consists of river-riparian habitat, tenant who is also responsible for dryland hay fields, and both flood and repairs and maintenance. The river pivot irrigated crop land where grain bottom is comprised of open meadows and alfalfa have historically been interspersed with cattail sloughs, grown. All of the irrigated ground brushy areas and large cottonwood — approximately 274 acres — which and juniper trees, offering superb includes 179+/- acres under two pivots, is located on this wildlife habitat. The spring creek and newer trout pond part of the property. For the last few years, the crop has are situated on this end of the property. consisted entirely of alfalfa and grass hay with total yields in the 1,000 to 1,200+/- ton range. This production ground The southern part of the ranch consists primarily of native www.LiveWaterProperties.com pasture and grazing land, with scattered pine, fir, juniper, the bottom. Mule deer and elk use this area for bedding. aspen and cottonwood trees, brushy vegetation and sage, Another small trout pond stocked with brook trout is draws, canyons and high benches. Expansive panoramic located on Antelope Creek. This portion of the ranch is views of the mountains can be seen subject to an annual grazing lease with in all directions from the high ridges, a separate agricultural operator. The and there are numerous spectacular lease allows for grazing of yearlings, building sites with huge vistas. An cows, cow/calf pairs, bulls and horses. access road runs through a main draw Under the grazing standards set forth south of the buildings and parallel by the lease agreement, stock may to the cottonwood and aspen-lined graze no more than 50% (by weight) of Antelope Creek, and a spur ranch road runs west from this the current year’s grass resource, and carrying capacity of main road, making a loop around the highest ridge to the the range has been estimated at approximately 300 AUMs. west of the creek. The southwest corner of the ranch includes The operator is responsible for repairs and maintenance, a large tree-filled canyon with scattered spring water in and the owner controls any weed issues. www.LiveWaterProperties.com www.LiveWaterProperties.com Improvements: There are two houses on the ranch, along with several outbuildings including a large horse arena and barn. Both houses are rented on a month-to-month basis to separate tenants. The first house was originally built in 1895 and was remodeled in 2006. It has two stories with approximately 2,400 sqft of living area, five bedrooms, one bath and gas/forced air heating. The second house was built in 1996 and is one story with approximately 1,850 sqft of living space. This house has four bedrooms and 3 full baths with gas and hot water/radiant heating. The outbuildings include the following: • Metal Pole Frame Building, closed with 4 sides — built in 2006, 80ʹ x 120ʹ • Metal Pole Frame Building, closed with 4 sides — built in 2006, 36ʹ x 112ʹ • Metal Pole Frame Building, closed with 4 sides — built in 1940, 27ʹ x 100ʹ • Wood Pole Frame Building, 1 side open — built in 1996, 28ʹ x 60ʹ • Prefab Building with Vertical Walls — built in 1970, 50ʹ x 80ʹ • Frame Implement Shed — built 1960, 26ʹ x 32ʹ • 60,000 BU Grain Bins w/o aerator — built in 1960, 21ʹ / circumference of 56ʹ • 60,000 BU Grain Bins w/o aerator — built in 1940, 11ʹ / circumference of 37ʹ Both of the agricultural leases and the two residential leases can be terminated by the owner of the ranch by 30-day notice. Currently, the overall management of the ranch is facilitated through a professional ranch management firm, which oversees lease negotiation, infrastructure improvements, weed spraying, range and pasture management, and hunting activities, on behalf of the owner. www.LiveWaterProperties.com Live Water: A highlight of the Antelope Creek Ranch is its 2+/- miles is the upper 100 miles that receive the most serious interest of frontage on the Yellowstone River. Volumes have been from trout anglers. This Blue Ribbon classified section written in past and present fishing literature about this constitutes the largest continuous stretch of trout water in revered fishery. Beginning its journey in Yellowstone the state with such designation — almost a fourth of all such National Park, the river drains an enormous watershed, and defined water in Montana. its many tributaries include the finest wild trout streams. Running 680 undammed miles to its confluence with the The Yellowstone is a compelling mix of shallow riffles, Missouri River in western North Dakota, the Yellowstone has undercut banks, deep holes and runs, and expansive tail- the distinction of being the longest free-flowing river in the outs, offering a variety of trout habitat and consistent contiguous United States. The river leaves Yellowstone and success to anglers possessing a myriad of presentation enters Montana at Gardiner, then flows northeast through skills. The three main trout species in the river are the native the dramatic Paradise Valley until reaching Livingston, Yellowstone cutthroat, brown and rainbow — naturally where it makes a bend to the east and flows in that direction reproducing wild fish. Additionally, brook trout are found through the bulk of south-central and eastern Montana. in the river — generally in the immediate vicinity of feeder While trout can be found as far downstream as Billings, it creeks — as are Mountain whitefish, which are abundant. www.LiveWaterProperties.com Not only does the river have a substantial population of late spring, summer and early autumn, there is excellent trout, it also supports some impressively huge fish. One look dry fly fishing using a variety of adult-phase, imitative and at the “Wall of Fame” in Dan Bailey’s Fly Shop in Livingston attractor patterns that include midges, blue-winged olive, will confirm that the Yellowstone River has produced baetis and pale morning mayfly duns, and several genus of trophies over the years, and biologists electro-fishing the both caddis and stonefly.
Recommended publications
  • Table of Contents Chapter 1.0 the Growth Policy
    TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1.0 THE GROWTH POLICY ............................................... 1 1.1 INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................1 1.2 STATEMENT OF INTENT......................................................................................1 1.4 PREPARATION OF THE GROWTH POLICY ........................................................1 1.4.1 GETTING STARTED ..........................................................................1 1.4.2 REAFFIRMATION OF EXISTING GOALS.................................................2 1.4.3 IDENTIFICATION OF ISSUES, NEEDS AND PREFERENCES.......................3 1.4.4 POLICY DEVELOPMENT .....................................................................4 1.5 GROWTH POLICY ADMINISTRATION...............................................................5 1.5.1 IMPLEMENTATION ...........................................................................5 1.5.2 CONDITIONS FOR GROWTH POLICY REVISIONS ...................................5 1.5.3 TIMETABLE FOR REVIEW...................................................................5 1.5.4 COOPERATION WITH CITY OF BIG TIMBER ..........................................6 1.5.5 CITY-COUNTY PLANNING BOARD JURISDICTION .................................6 CHAPTER 2.0 COUNTY HISTORY AND DESCRIPTION ........................... 7 2.1 COUNTY HISTORY ..............................................................................................7 2.2 AREA DESCRIPTIONS........................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • Soil Survey of Sweet Grass County Area, Montana
    How to Use This Soil Survey Detailed Soil Maps The detailed soil maps can be useful in planning the use and management of small areas. To find information about your area of interest, you can locate the Section, Township, and Range by zooming in on the Index to Map Sheets, or you can go to the Web Soil Survey at (http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/). Note the map unit symbols that are in that area. The Contents lists the map units by symbol and name and shows the page where each map unit is described. See the Contents for sections of this publication that may address your specific needs. ii This soil survey is a publication of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly the Soil Conservation Service) has leadership for the Federal part of the National Cooperative Soil Survey. Major fieldwork for this soil survey was completed in 1997. Soil names and descriptions were approved in 1997. Unless otherwise indicated, statements in this publication refer to conditions in the survey area in 1997. This survey was made cooperatively by the Natural Resources Conservation Service and the Montana Agricultural Experiment Station. It is part of the technical assistance furnished to the Sweet Grass County Conservation District. The most current official data are available through the NRCS Soil Data Mart website at http://soildatamart.nrcs.usda.gov. Soil maps in this survey may be copied without permission.
    [Show full text]
  • Crazy Mountains Complaint
    Case 1:19-cv-00066-SPW-TJC Document 1 Filed 06/10/19 Page 1 of 114 Matthew K. Bishop Western Environmental Law Center 103 Reeder’s Alley Helena, Montana 59601 406-324-8011 [email protected] Michael A. Kauffman DRAKE LAW FIRM, P.C. 111 North Last Chance Gulch Suite 3J, Arcade Building Helena, MT 59601 406-495-8080 [email protected] Counsel for Plaintiffs IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION FRIENDS OF THE CRAZY MOUNTAINS, a public land No. organization; MONTANA CHAPTER BACKCOUNTRY HUNTERS AND COMPLAINT FOR ANGLERS, a non-profit DECLARATORY AND organization; ENHANCING INJUNCTIVE RELIEF MONTANA’S WILDLIFE AND HABITAT, a public outreach organization; SKYLINE SPORTSMEN’S ASSOCIATION, a non-profit organization, Plaintiffs, vs. 1 Case 1:19-cv-00066-SPW-TJC Document 1 Filed 06/10/19 Page 2 of 114 MARY ERICKSON, in her official capacity as Forest Supervisor for the Custer Gallatin National Forest; LEANNE MARTEN, in her official capacity as Regional Forester, Region One, for the U.S. Forest Service; VICKI CHRISTIANSEN, in her official capacity as chief of the U.S. Forest Service; THE UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, a federal agency; THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, a federal department, Federal-Defendants. INTRODUCTION 1. Friends of the Crazy Mountains, the Montana Chapter of Backcountry Hunters and Anglers, Enhancing Montana’s Wildlife and Habitat, and the Skyline Sportsmen’s Association (collectively “Plaintiffs”), bring this civil action for declaratory and injunctive relief against Federal-Defendants (“the U.S. Forest Service” or “the Service”) pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings for Collaborative Science
    Proceedings for Collaborative Science American Water Resources Association Montana Section 2018 Conference October 17 - October 19, 2018 Holiday Inn West Yellowstone-- West Yellowstone, Montana Contents Thanks to Planners and Sponsors Full Meeting Agenda About the Keynote Speakers Concurrent Session and Poster Abstracts* Session 1. Ecology Session 2. Hydrology Session 3. Environmental Chemistry Session 4. Water Quality Session 5. Management and Restoration Session 6. Collaboration Session 7. Modeling Session 8. Climate Poster Session *These abstracts were not edited and appear as submitted by the author, except for some changes in font and format. 1 THANKS TO ALL WHO MAKE THIS EVENT POSSIBLE! • The AWRA Officers Emilie Erich Hoffman, President -- Montana DEQ Melissa Schaar, Vice President -- Montana DNRC Kim Snodgrass, Treasurer -- Water and Environmental Technologies Nancy Hystad, Executive Secretary -- Montana State University • Montana Water Center, Meeting Coordination Wyatt Cross, Director, and Whitney Lonsdale, Assistant Director And especially the conference presenters, field trip leaders, moderators, student judges and volunteers. Emilie Erich Hoffman Melissa Schaar Kim Snodgrass Nancy Hystad 2 3 WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 17, 2018 REGISTRATION 9:30 am – 7:00 pm REGISTRATION Preconference registration available at water.montana.edu/awra/registration/ WORKSHOP, FIELD TRIP and HYDROPHILE RUN 10:00 am - 12:00 pm Communication Workshop: Effective Presentation Training (please register) Led by MT State Professional Development Center 1:00
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Plac Registration Form
    NFS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024^4)018 (Rev. Oct. 1990) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLAC REGISTRATION FORM 1. Name of Property historic name: Harrison, Waborn (Wabe) and Sarah E., Ranch House other name/site number: 2. Location street & number: not for publication: n/a vicinity: X city/town: Greycliff state: Montana code: MT county: Sweet Grass code: 097 zip code: 59033 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the Na tional Historic Preservation Act of 1 986, as amende d, I hereby certify that this X nomination _ request for determination of eligibility meets the docijmentation standards for registering properties in th< 3 National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedurgJ.aRd-^iofea5iuiiji>trfgmii(fc!iriBrH( • set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the prc oertv X meets does not meet the National Reaister Criteria^" 1 recommend ttfa"t this ipVopertyH )e considered significant _ nationally _ statewide X locally. V^^ ^^*~.^^ X-—S- ^~~"—•—••»•.• — — - — - "miiiiii_ ^ Signature of certifying official/Title ' Date Montana State Historic Preservation Office State or Federal agency or bureau ( _ See continuation sheet for additional comments.) In my opinion, the property _ '_ meets _ does not meet the National Register criteria. Signature of commenting or other official Date State or Federal agency and bureau 4. National Park Service Certification I, heieby certify that this property is: ^/entered in the National Register _ see continuation sheet _ determined eligible for the National Register _ see continuation sheet _ determined not eligible for the National Register _ see continuation sheet _ removed from the National Register _see continuation sheet_ other (explain): ____ Harrison.
    [Show full text]
  • Dnrc Summary Report Sb330 Water Reservation Ten Year Review
    DNRC SUMMARY REPORT SB330 WATER RESERVATION TEN YEAR REVIEW June 2016 Water Resource Division Water Rights Bureau 1424 9th Avenue P.O. Box 201601 Helena, Montana 59620-1601 http://dnrc.mt.gov/divisions/water/water-rights for questions call (406) 444-6614 TABLE OF CONTENTS Project Description .............................................................................. …….. 1 Municipal Reservations ……………………………………………………………………………. 2 Yellowstone Final Order ..................................................................... 3 Lower Missouri Final Order................................................................. 5 Upper Missouri Final Order ................................................................. 6 Conservation District Reservations ……………………………………………………………. 8 Yellowstone Final Order …………………………………………………………………. 9 Lower Missouri Final Order …………………………………………………………….. 10 Upper Missouri Final Order …………………………………………………………….. 11 State & Federal Reservations ……………………………………………………………………. 11 Yellowstone Final Order …………………………………………………………………. 12 Upper Missouri Final Order ……………………………………………………………. 13 Appendix A, (Yellowstone Municipal Reservations).…………………………………. 14 Big Timber .......................................................................................…. 15 Billings ................................................................................................. 19 Broadus ............................................................................................... 23 Columbus ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Billings. Montana October 29. 1948 Mr. C. G. Kegel. Deputy U. S. Distri Ct
    Reproduced at the National Archives ~~<:;eattle. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY FOR MONTANA Billings. Montana October 29. 1948 Mr. C. G. Kegel. Deputy U. S. Distri ct Court Federal Bui lding Great Falls. Montana Re: U. s. ~~ L. Va!LCleve....._~ a1- Dear Keg: Enclosed please find original complaint and two copi es'lt.ner-eor , Please file the origina 1 complaint and issue summons, and advi se us of the date of filing and the number assigned. You will also find enclosed an or-tgdna L and two copies of a notice of application for preliminary in- I junction which should be delivered to the Marshal, asking the Marshal to serve the original summons and the original notice upon each of the defendants by delivering to them, and each of them, a copy of the summons, complaint and order. The post o1'fice address of the defendants is Melville, Montana, but I believe that they are still residing upon the Van Cleve ranch situated in the Big Timber Canyon some thirty miles north of Big Timber, Montana. Service upon the defendant corporation may be made by service upon Helen P. Van Cleve, Who is the major stockholder of said corporation and the wife of the defendant Paul L. Van Cleve, Jr. I or service may be made upon the defendant corporation by s er vLng Paul L. Van Cleve I Jr., who is the active business manager of the defendant corporation • .This is an action to obtain a declaratory judg- ment to establish the existence of a public road and trail through and upon the lands owned by the defendants.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents Chapter 1.0 the Growth Policy
    TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1.0 THE GROWTH POLICY .......................................................................... 5 1.1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 5 1.2 STATEMENT OF INTENT ...................................................................................... 5 1.3 PREPARATION OF THE GROWTH POLICY ......................................................... 5 1.3.1 GETTING STARTED ...................................................................................... 5 1.3.2 IDENTIFICATION OF ISSUES, NEEDS AND PREFERENCES .................................. 5 1.3.3 POLICY DEVELOPMENT ................................................................................. 6 1.4 GROWTH POLICY ADMINISTRATION ............................................................... 6 1.4.1 IMPLEMENTATION ....................................................................................... 6 1.4.2 CONDITIONS FOR GROWTH POLICY REVISIONS ............................................... 6 1.4.3 TIMETABLE FOR REVIEW .............................................................................. 6 1.4.4 COORDINATION WITH OTHER GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES ............................... 7 1.4.5 CITY-COUNTY PLANNING BOARD JURISDICTION ............................................. 4 CHAPTER 2.0 COUNTY HISTORY AND DESCRIPTION ................................................ 9 2.1 COUNTY HISTORY .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sweet Grass County Long Range Plan 2019
    MONTANA Focused Conservation SWEET GRASS COUNTY LONG-RANGE PLAN December 2019 1 Table of Contents Section I – Introduction……………………………………………………………………5 Section II – Natural Resources Inventory………………………………………………5 Humans………………………………………………………………………………5 General………………………………………………………………………5 History………………………………………………………………………..5 Land Cover/Land Use………………………………………………………7 Land Ownership……………………………………………………………..8 Demographics……………………………………………………………….8 Agricultural Profile…………………………………………………………..9 Physiography/Drainage…………………………………………………………...9 Geology/Soils………………………………………………………………………10 Climate………………………………………………………………………………10 Water…………………………………………………………………………………11 General………………………………………………………………………11 Irrigation……………………………………………………………………..11 Livestock Water……………………………………………………………..12 Water Quality………………………………………………………………..13 Air and Energy……………………………………………………………………...14 Non-attainment and Maintenance Areas for Air Quality Standards……14 Visibility Standards………………………………………………………….14 Utility/Power Company Coverage…………………………………………15 Wind…………………………………………………………………………..15 Plants…………………………………………………………………………………15 General……………………………………………………………………….15 Rangeland……………………………………………………………………15 Introduced Species Pasture………………………………………………..16 Riparian Areas……………………………………………………………….16 Forest…………………………………………………………………………16 Sensitive or Declining Plant Communities………………………………..17 Invasive Species…………………………………………………………….17 Animals……………………………………………………………………………….17 Animal Feeding Operations (AFOs)……………………………………….17 Fish……………………………………………………………………………18 Wildlife………………………………………………………………………...18
    [Show full text]
  • Madison County Sheriff's Office Continues Investigations of Thefts, Burglaries County Planning Board Drafts Pre- Construction
    OUTPOST EVENTS CALENDAR For up-to-date local events Page C1 & C4 THE LOCAL NEWS OF THE MADISON VALLEY, RUBY VALLEY AND SURROUNDING AREAS Montana’s Oldest Publishing Weekly Newspaper. Established 1873 75¢ | Volume 141, Issue 40 www.madisoniannews.com Thursday, August 1, 2013 21st Century County planning Community Learning Center board drafts pre- construction safety form Faith Moldan ers but also their neighbors and The Madisonian surrounding community. [email protected] Big Sky uses a similar form, which was instituted after Development and construc- issues occurred while respond- tion processes entail a large ing to calls. Homes either had amount of activity and plan- driveways that were inaccessi- ning. Sometimes floorplans and ble or had an incorrect address. paint colors take precedence Sometimes fire officials had no over safety considerations. idea the home was even there. Fire officials at Monday Challenges like that do not al- night’s Madison County Plan- low for speedy response time, ning Board meeting said they Madison County Planning Di- like to see property owners who rector Charity Fechter said. take care of their own property “It’s simply a matter of pub- and safety, which most property lic safety,” Fechter said. owners do. However, those who The review form needs Photo by Faith Moldan do not take care of their prop- to be revised and finalized by Incoming kindergarten students chat while working on an alphabet project. erty and safety make it difficult Fechter, the planning board and and less enticing for crews to director of emergency manage- respond to a call that may put ment, Chris Mumme.
    [Show full text]
  • SWEET GRASS CREEK Water Supply and Storage Potential Study 2006-2008
    SWEET GRASS CREEK Water Supply and Storage Potential Study 2006-2008 Montana Department of Natural Resources and Conservation DNRC Report: WR 2.D.7a SGC Sweet Grass Creek Helena, Montana March 2010 Contents Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 1 Project Area .............................................................................................................................. 1 Stream Flow Monitoring .......................................................................................................... 4 Water Supply ............................................................................................................................ 6 Potential Storage ...................................................................................................................... 9 Synoptic Flow Measurements ................................................................................................ 10 Discussion .............................................................................................................................. 13 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................ 14 Appendix A – Inflow/Outflow Hydrographs for 2006-2008 ................................................. 15 Appendix B – Daily Stream Flow Data for Sweet Grass Creek 2006-2008 .......................... 18 Appendix C – Potentially Storable Volume Graphs 2006-2008
    [Show full text]
  • Streamflow Characteristics of the Yellowstone River Basin, Montana, Through September 1982
    STREAMFLOW CHARACTERISTICS OF THE YELLOWSTONE RIVER BASIN, MONTANA, THROUGH SEPTEMBER 1982 By R. J. Omang U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 84-4063 Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT Helena, Montana May 1984 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR WILLIAM P. CLARK, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For additional information Copies of this report can be write to: purchased from: District Chief Open-File Services Section U.S. Geological Survey Western Distribution Branch 301 S. Park U.S. Geological Survey 428 Federal Building Box 25425, Federal Center Drawer 10076 Denver, CO 80225-0425 Helena, MT 59626-0076 Telephone: (303) 234-5888 CONTENTS Page Abstract ................................... 1 Introduction ................................. 1 Streamflow records .............................. 1 Station description ............................ 2 Period of record .............................. 3 Effects of regulation. ........................... 3 Tabulations of strearaflow characteristics. .................. 3 Monthly and annual mean discharge. ..................... 4 Flood frequency. .............................. 4 Low-flow frequency ............................. 4 High-flow frequency ............................ 5 Flow duration. ............................... 5 References cited ............................... 5 List of gaging stations, in downstream order ................. 6 Streamflow-gaging-station descriptions and statistical tables. ........ 8 ILLUSTRATION Figure
    [Show full text]